Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Attention is not a single concept, but the name for a variety of psychological
phenomena1. While most research has been involved with visual and auditory
attention, we can as well attend to smells, tastes, sensations and proprioceptive
information. Memory is intimately related to attention. We seem to remember what
we have attended to. Although the subject may not be explicitly able to recall, at
conscious level, that some particular information was presented, unattended
stimuli has an effect, by biasing or priming, subsequent responses. If a stimulus is
apparently unattended it seems to have to be unconscious.
Posner (1993) divides work on attention into three phases. First, in the 1950s and
1960s, research centred on human performance, and on the concept of the human
as a single channel processor. In the 1970s and early 1980s the field of study had
become Cognition and research was most concerned with looking for and studying
internal representations, automatic and controlled processes and strategies for
focusing and dividing attention. By the mid 1980s, Cognitive neuroscience was
the name of the game and psychologists were account taking account of biology,
neuropsychological patients and computing.
Welford (1952) carried out an experiment which showed that, when two signals are
presented in rapid succession and the subject must make a speed response to both,
reaction time to the second stimulus depends on the stimulus onset asynchrony
(SOA) between the presentation of the first and the second stimulus. He introduced
the concept of the bottleneck, where the processing of the first stimulus must
be completed before processing of the next stimulus can begin 3.
2 The Mysteries of Attention, p 41, State University of New York Press, 1993
On the other hand, when the speaker switched gender (and pitch), or when speech
was replaced with 400-Hz tone, listeners almost always noticed and remarked on it.
Cherry concluded that certain statistical properties (of the rejected message are)
identified, but that detailed aspects, such as language, individual words, or
semantic content are unnoticed.
In this model, although information enters the system in parallel, it is held only
temporarily in the buffer memory. Unless information is selected to pass through
the filter for further processing, that information is lost. (...) This means that
selection from the parallel inputs is made at early levels of processing and is
therefore an early selection model5.
4 Ibidem, p.15
5 Ibidem, p.17
Selective attention helps us to protect from overloaded our information-processing
system. If attention needed to be divided between both ears to monitor both
messages at once, then the filter was said to be able to switch rapidly between
channels on the basis of the spatial location or physical characteristics of
information in the sensory buffer.
According to Broadbent, we only seem to be able to do two tasks at the same time,
when those tasks can proceed momentarily without attention, allowing time for
rapid switching between them.
Later, his theory was challenged by Moray (1959), who found that listeners often
recognized their own name when it was presented on the unshadowed and, in
theory, unattended ear. This was quite contradictory to the notion of selective filter
that allowed input to the serial, limited capacity channel only of the basis of
physical attributes. Moray concluded that there must be some parallel semantic
processing prior to conscious identification. Anne Treisman (1960) showed that,
even if a subject is attending to the stream of events on one channel, there may be
information breakthrough from unattended channel. Other theories suggested that
the selective bottleneck between pre-attentive parallel processing and serial
attentive processing could move according to different circumstances and task
demands.
Recovering
Repetitive presentation of the same stimulus, for example, may temporary inhibit
receptivity to that stimulus, a phenomenon called as habituation. On the other
hand, receptivity to all or broad class of stimuli may be affected because the
individuals general state, or arousal, has been altered. These two causes of
changes in receptivity may loosely be identified as the phasic and tonic aspects of
alertness, respectively.
Kahneman (1973) suggested that processing resources (or effort) are mobilized in
response to task demands, and that there is a fixed allocation of effort for each task.
Time pressure increases processing demands. Davies found that the level of
7 Ibidem
8 Ibidem, p. 418
performance improves from morning to afternoon testing for an auditory
simultaneous-discrimination task. For successive-discrimination task, however,
performance deteriorated from morning to afternoon. In addition, the sensitivity
decline over time on task for the successive-discrimination task occurred both in the
morning and in the afternoon.
Divided attention
Visual search is an active interrogation of the visual world during which people
detect and use meaningful patterns of relationships to decide where to look first and
in what sequence to seek for further information. People also actively look for some
things rather than others. There are two types of active control: knowing where to
look and the control of what to look for.
9 Johnson, Addie, Attention. Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications, 2004, p. 163
Johnson and Dark (1986) looked at theories of selective attention and
divided them into cause theories and effect theories. p 6.
attend
top-down process
vision
audition
Beginnings
During the Second World War people realized how limited are their ability to act on
multiple signals arriving on different channels.
Attention is taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form of one
out of what seems several simultaneously possible object or trains of
thought. Focalization, concentration of consciousness are of its essence. It
implies withdrawal of some things in order to deal effectively with others
Automatic processing is a fast parallel, fairly effortless process, that is not limited by
short-term memory (STM) capacity, is not under direct subject control, and is
responsible for the performance of well-developed skilled behaviors. Automatic
processing typically develops when subjects process stimuli consistent over many
trials. For example, practice at dialing a specific phone number several hundred
times will develop automatic processes to produce that phone number. Dialing that
number becomes fast and fairly effortless, can be done while engaged in other
activities, and can even occur unintentionally (dialing ones number while
attempting to dial another number with the same starting sequence.
Attentional Paradigms
Selective Attention
The process of selective attention is one in which `the organism selectively attends
to some stimuli, or aspects of stimuli, in preference to others`. (Kahneman, 1973,
p.3). This concept presupposes that there is some bottleneck, or capacity limitation,
in the processing system and that subjects have the ability to give preference to
certain stimuli so that they pass through this bottleneck easily and at the expense
of other stimuli. Probably the best-known real life example of selective attention is
listening to a single voice in a room full of people talking at the same time. There
are many variants of selective attention. Attention tasks are classified according to
what they require the subject to select: inputs (or stimuli) from a particular source;
targets of a particular type; a particular attribute of objects; outputs (or responses)
in a particular category.
There is growing agreement that these varieties of selective attention are governed
by different rules and are to be explained by different mechanisms 11. Berlyne
pioneered in the study of collative properties, such as novelty, complexity, and
incongruity, which cause some stimuli to be more arousing than others. Berlyne was
mainly concerned with involuntary attention.
In voluntary attention the subject attends to stimuli because they are relevant to a
task that he has chosen to perform, not because of their arousing quality.
One of the classic dilemmas of psychology concerns the division of attention among
concurrent streams of mental activity. The bottleneck is defined as a stage of
internal processing which can only operate one stimulus or one response
Divided attention
Divided attention occurs when we are required to perform two (or more) tasks at the same time and attention is required for the
performance of both (all) the tasks12. Examples include driving a car whilst carrying on a conversation with a passenger and eating
dinner whilst watching the news. When people are required to do more than one task at a time, performance on at least one of the
tasks often declines. It is generally agreed that humans have a limited capacity to process information and when several tasks are
performed at the same time, that capacity can be exceeded.
When an individual performs a task, different mental operations need to take place in order to carry out the task or mental activity for
example, responding, rehearsing and perceiving. Theories of perceptual attention treat the perceptual system as a limited resource
to be allocated amongst these tasks as performance would require some of the individual?s limited processing resources. An
individual?s inability at times to effectively time-share attention may be attributed to the fact that the resources are limited. However,
on the other hand, different activities may demand different types of resources, therefore resulting in less competition for the limited
resources and more successful time-sharing.
their ability to schedule tasks so that they do not interfere with one another
12http://www.wits.ac.za/academic/humanities/umthombo/psychology/ergonomics/se
ctions/attention/7482/divided_attention.html
their ability to effectively switch between tasks in order to complete them in parallel. This ability may further be affected
by:
o Confusion ? this results when elements of the tasks become confused due to their similarity, e.g. trying to listen
to two speakers at once who are delivering similar messages.
o Co-operation ? similarity of tasks can result in co-operation or integration of the two tasks into one, e.g. a piano
and a drum being played sharing a common rhythm.
Single resource theoryand the multiple resource theory. The single resource theory proposes that there is a single
undifferentiated pool of resources available to all tasks and mental activities.
Multiple resource theory proposes that instead of one pool of resources, there are several different, dichotomous
dimensions of resources.
In addition to the explanations offered by these theories, it is essential to note that individual differences will influence
time-sharing effectiveness. These individual difference will include such the expertise/skill of the performer (on one or both
tasks) through practise or a natural ability.
Focused Attention
Focused attention studies examine the ability of subjects to reject irrelevant messages. A clasic
example involving the need to ignore irrelevant inputs is a cocktail party situation in which a
guest tries to listen to one conversation and ignore all others.
Much research in attention assumes that there is a limited poop af attentional resourses, or
capacity, that can bi distributed across tasks. According to simple capacity models, if the subject
has 100 units of capacity and is required to perform two tasks each requiring 75 units,
performance should decline when shifting from performing the task individually to performing
the simultaneously.
Automatic-control processing theory assumes attentional capacity limitations are the result of
competition between control processes. Hence combining tasks in which control capacity is
exceeded should result in reduced performance.
The experiments indicate that subjects find continual control processing very effortful, and
reduction in effort result in performance decrements.
Alcohol
Such factor as motivation, personality, perception or experiential factors play an important role
in vigilance behavior.
Attention in learning , Tom Trabasso carte albastra p 2
acetylcholine