Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10006-013-0424-3
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 17 February 2013 / Accepted: 26 June 2013 / Published online: 9 July 2013
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
significantly greater in subjects with anterior disc displace- prevalence not only of TMJ symptoms but also of disc
ment without reduction than in those without anterior disc displacement and bony changes in the TMJ. Various imaging
displacement without reduction using multivariate logistic techniques can be used to evaluate the TMJ, such as
regression analysis (p=0.031; odds ratio, 1.129) (Table 3). transcranial radiography, tomography, arthrography, com-
Table 4 indicates differences in cephalometric measurements puted tomography, and MRI. In particular, MRI shows a high
among subjects with and without bony changes. While diagnostic accuracy in determining the articular disc position
univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated many related to the condyle and articular eminence [22]. This
significant differences among groups, only SN to ramus plane imaging modality also offers many advantages, such as non-
angle (GZN angle) was significantly greater in subjects with invasiveness, minimal pain, minimal risk, and freedom from
bony changes than in those without bony changes using exposure to ionizing radiation. The aim of this study was to
multiple logistic regression analysis (p=0.032; odds ratio, determine which cephalometric variables provide informa-
1.194) (Table 5). tion on TMJ internal derangement in women with anterior
open bite, using MRI as the gold standard. A causal
relationship has been reported between internal derangement
Discussion of the TMJ and an abnormal facial skeleton, which is
characterized primarily by a retrognathic mandible, mandib-
The anterior position of the disc observed in asymptomatic ular asymmetry, and occlusal instability [23]. However,
TMJs should, to some extent, be considered as a normal Brand et al. [10] found no distinct relationship between the
variation [18]. On the other hand, there have been studies morphological features of the face and internal derangement
showing that the surgical induction of anterior disc of the TMJ. These different conclusions are probably the
displacement (ADD) in rabbits results in degenerative result of differing methods of sample selection. For example,
changes of the condylar cartilage [19]. Additionally, there Schellhas et al. [8] included patients with an externally
have been several studies suggesting ADD as an etiological visible mandibular deformity. In the present study, anterior
factor of osteoarthritis and/or to be associated with disc displacement was observed mostly on the deviated side
osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease accompanied by in patients with mandibular deviation [24]. The TMJ is a
clinical pain [20]. Occlusal relationships such as skeletal unique joint which functions with both sides operating in
anterior open bite, reduced overbite, and increased overjet tandem. As different forces act on each side, cases with facial
have been shown to be associated with TMJ osteoarthrosis asymmetry showing less than 2 mm of deviation between the
[21]. To evaluate the relationship between TMJ disorders and menton and facial midline were excluded from this study.
dentofacial abnormalities, it is necessary to examine the Likewise, the adult females showed steeper mandibular and
occlusal plane angles than the male samples. [25] Consid-
ering sex-related differences, men were not included in the
Table 3 Factors related to incidence of ADDwoR of TMJ in dentofacial study. We found that the SNMP angle of patients with
deformity with anterior open bite (multivariate analysis) anterior disc displacement without reduction was greater than
that of the patients without anterior disc displacement
Odds ratio 95 % confidence interval p value
without reduction (p<0.05). The GZN angle of patients with
SN-MP angle () 1.129 0.7810.988 .031 bony changes was greater than that of the patients without
bony changes (p<0.05). No significant relationships were
400 Oral Maxillofac Surg (2014) 18:397401
identified between overbite and either anterior disc displace- evaluation of the increase in the degenerative change of the
ment without reduction or bony changes. These results TMJ and the reduction in vertical dimension of the ramus may
suggest that, potentially, the increased mandibular plane help to elucidate the relationship between these two
angle may be the cause of increased likelihood of anterior phenomena.
disc displacement without reduction, and potentially, the Given the above findings, the consequences due to the
increased ramus angle may be the cause of increased shortening of the condylar bone changes occurring subsequent
likelihood of bony changes in the TMJ. to anterior disc displacement without reduction suggest the
In our previous study, the prevalence of bony changes was possibility of increased GZN angle clockwise rotation which
40 % in closed lock cases. As disc displacement was supposed occurs in the lower jaw. More previous studies have suggested
to have occurred before the joint had degenerated, this type of that internal derangement of the TMJ is associated with altered
joint disease was considered secondary [13]. The incidence of facial morphology. Adolescents with internal derangement of
anterior disc displacement without reduction was higher in the TMJ show decreased ramus and facial heights and
patients with skeletal open bite than in volunteers (p<0.01), posterior rotation of the ramus and mandibular plane [8, 10].
and in joints that were much affected, the incidence of bony These studies indicate that facial morphology with internal
change in the TMJ was higher for patients with skeletal open derangement of the TMJ is related to the skeletal open bite
bite than for patients with closed lock (p<0.05) [17]. These tendency. In contrast to previous studies, subjects of our study
results suggest that skeletal open bite may be a factor were restricted to women with anterior open bite, who have a
associated with increased incidence of anterior disc displace- high possibility of potential internal derangement. Subdividing
ment without reduction and bony changes in the TMJ. malocclusion patients, as performed in this study, increases the
Although the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain, one ease and accuracy of investigating associations between disc
possibility is that excessive mandibular stress on the condylar displacement and dentofacial morphological changes.
heads in patients with skeletal open bite overloads the TMJ Such changes in dentofacial morphology might be associated
[15]. Measurement of differences in intra-articular pressure with mandibular morphology. A reduction in mandibular body
between patients with skeletal open bite and control subjects length and effective mandibular length has been associated with
without dentofacial abnormalities during mandibular function skeletal Class II and a retrognathic mandible, whereas posterior
should help to clarify the mechanisms involved. Chen et al. rotation of the mandibular ramus and reduction in ramus height
[13] reported that condylar degenerative changes may lead to have been associated with a reduction in total posterior facial
deformities of the jaw, in turn resulting in decreased vertical height and a steep mandibular plane. Cartilage changes have
dimension of the proximal mandibular segments. We found been shown to link retrognathic mandibular growth to TMJ
that some patients with skeletal open bite showed worn facets disc displacement in a rabbit model [26].
and no protuberances on the incisal edges. Simultaneous According to the present results, care is required in cases
with dentofacial deformity with a large angle of SN-MP or
Table 5 Factors related to incidence of Bone changes of TMJ in
GZN regarding the presence of anterior disc displacement
dentofacial deformity with anterior open bite -multivariate analysis- without reduction or bony changes. Regardless of the
existence of open bite, if patients with large SN-MP or GZN
Odds ratio 95 % confidence interval p value
can be followed longitudinally and investigated radiologically
GZN angle () 1.194 0.6900.984 .032 and clinically, the clinical relationships between TMJ disorder
and growth of the facial skeleton will be clarified.
Oral Maxillofac Surg (2014) 18:397401 401
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of morphology in women with anterior open bite. Am J Orthod
interest. Dentofacial Orthop 128:8795
13. Chen YJ, Shih TT, Wang JS, Wang HY, Shiau YY (2005) Magnetic
resonance images of the temporomandibular joints of patients with
acquired open bite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 99:734742
References 14. Gidarakou IK, Tallents RH, Kyrkanides S, Stein S, Moss ME (2004)
Comparison of skeletal and dental morphology in asymptomatic
volunteers and symptomatic patients with unilateral disk displace-
1. Emshoff R, Moriggl A, Rudisch A, Brunold S, Neunteufel N, ment with reduction. Angle Orthod 74:684689
Crismani A (2011) Cephalometric variables discriminate among 15. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP (1995) Occlusion,
magnetic resonance imaging-based structural characteristic groups of orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review.
the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral J Orofac Pain 9:7390
Radiol Endod 112:118125 16. Gokalp H (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of
2. Moon BS, Yang IH, Ahn SJ (2011) Dentofacial characteristics of positional relationship between the disk and condyle in asymptomatic
women with oversized mandible and temporomandibular joint young adult mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 73:550555
internal derangement. Angle Orthod 81:469477 17. Yura S, Ooi K, Kadowaki S, Totsuka IN (2010) Magnetic resonance
3. Ahn SJ, Kim TW, Nahm DS (2004) Cephalometric keys to internal imaging of the temporomandibular joint in patients with skeletal
derangement of temporomandibular joint in women with Class II open bite and subjects with no dentofacial abnormalities. Br J Oral
malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:486494 Maxillofac Surg 48:459461
4. Fernndez SJ, Gmez GJM, Hoyo JA (1998) Relationship between 18. Westesson PL, Eriksson L, Kurita K (1989) Reliability of a negative
condylar position, dentofacial deformity and temporomandibular clinical temporomandibular joint examination: prevalence of disk
joint dysfunction: an MRI and CT prospective study. J displacement in asymptomatic temporomandibular joints. Oral Surg
Craniomaxillofac Surg 26:3542 Oral Med Oral Pathol 68:551554
5. Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Thilander B 19. Sharawy M, Ali AM, Choi WS (2003) Experimental induction of
(1990) A longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and anterior disk displacement of the rabbit craniomandibular joint: an
symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in children and adoles- immuno-electron microscopic study of collagen and proteoglycan
cents. Eur J Orthod 12:399407 occurrence in the condylar cartilage. J Oral Pathol Med 32:176184
6. Tallents RH, Catania J, Sommers E (1991) Temporomandibular 20. Campos MI, Campos PS, Cangussu MC, Guimaraes RC, Line SR
joint findings in pediatric populations and young adults: a critical (2008) Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and
review. Angle Orthod 61:716 pain in temporomandibular joints with and without degenerative
7. Dibbets JM, van der Weele LT (1996) Signs and symptoms of changes of the condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:529535
temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and craniofacial form. Am J 21. Wilkes CH (1989) Internal derangements of the temporomandibular
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:7378 joint. Pathological variations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
8. Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Wilkes CH (1993) Pediatric internal 115:469477
derangements of the temporomandibular joint: effect on facial 22. Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Hayakawa K, Miller TL, Goske MJ,
development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:5159 Wood BP (1985) Internal derangements of the temporomandiblar
9. Schellhas KP, Piper MA, Omile MR (1990) Facial skeleton joint: findings in the pediatric age group. Radiology 154:125128
remodeling due to temporomandibular joint degeneration: an 23. Link JJ, Nickerson JW Jr (1992) Temporomandibular joint internal
imaging study of 100 patients. Am J Neuroradiol 11:541551 derangements in an orthognathic surgery population. The International
10. Brand JW, Nielson KJ, Tallents RH, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Owen Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 7:161169
WL (1995) Lateral cephalometric analysis of skeletal patterns in 24. Ahn SJ, Kim TW, Nahn DS (2004) Cephalometric keys to internal
patients with and without internal derangement of the temporo- derangement of temporomandibular joint in women with Class II
mandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:121128 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:486495
11. Gidarakou IK, Tallents RH, Kyrkanides S, Stein S, Moss ME (2003) 25. Moldez MA, Sato K, Sugawara J, Mitani H (2006) Linear and
Comparison of skeletal and dental morphology in asymptomatic angular filipino cephalometric norms according to age and sex.
volunteers and symptomatic patients with bilateral degenerative Angle Orthod 76:800805
joint disease. Angle Orthod 73:7178 26. Bryndahl F, Warfvinge L, Eriksson L, Isberg A (2011) Cartilage
12. Byun ES, Ahn SJ, Kim TW (2005) Relationship between internal changes link retrognathic mandibular growth to TMJ disc displace-
derangement of the temporomandibular joint and dentofacial ment in a rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:621627
Copyright of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is the property of Springer Science & Business
Media B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.