You are on page 1of 3

The 2016 Conference on

Fundamental and Applied


Science
for Advanced Technology
Manuscript Evaluation Form

1. How important are the results presented in this manuscript? Please circle on the appropriate
score!

Score 4 3 2 1
Grade Critically Highly Suitable Less
important important important
Description Highly Findings are Important The results are
innovative, of interest to findings, of limited
attract the majority of attract the importance
interest of vast reader. A interest of and interest.
majority or significant reader on Requires
reader in step towards specific field additional data
various field next research

2. Does the results obtained by experiment/ theoretical works verify the hypothesis and
conclusion? Please circle on the appropriate score.

Score Description
4 Hypothesis is in accordance with the results. Conclusion is
supported by the data obtained
2 Hypothesis is partially in accordance with the results.
Conclusion is partially supported by the data obtained
0 Hypothesis is not in accordance with the results. Conclusion is
not supported by the data obtained

The 2016 ConFAST secretariat


Faculty of Science, Universitas Ahmad
Dahlan
Jln. Prof. Dr. Soepomo, S.H., Janturan, UH,
Yogyakarta
Telp: +62-274-563515 ext 3114, Fax: +62-
274-564604
Email: confast@uad.ac.id website:
http://confast.org
The 2016 Conference on
Fundamental and Applied
Science
for Advanced Technology
3. Is the length of the manuscript appropriate to its content? Minimum (maximum) length is 4
pages or approximately 3000 words (6 pages or approximately 5000 words). Please circle on
the appropriate score!

Yes (score: 4) No (score: 0)

4. Should the manuscript be accepted for publication? Please circle on the appropriate score!

1. Acceptable without change 2. Acceptable after minor revision


3. Reject, might be accepted after major 4. Reject
revision

5. Please provide your comment in the following! the ideal comments will cover the following
points:

- Summary

Overall this paper describes the use of Cobit 5 in Business Continuity Planning (BCP). The
way author matching between BCP factors and Cobit 5 might be useful for body of
knowledge as very limited papers had conducted similar studies. Unfortunately however
this paper did not pose any problem statement as most research article did. Thus it will be
more helpful if writer able to propose a problem statement that answered at the end of the
article. Secondly this paper needs to revise the in-text citation. This paper had 14 references
in the references list but none of them were cited in the body paper. Having a correct in-text
citation is important to track back the original idea therefore it is necessary to put it in the
article. It seems that this article is conducted through literature review and not a field
research. However this is not explained in the article. Adding a methodology section would
help reader in understanding this article better. Writer should also aware the use
abbreviation in the paper, it should be spell out on its first appearance (see big IF on the last
paragraph)

The 2016 ConFAST secretariat


Faculty of Science, Universitas Ahmad
Dahlan
Jln. Prof. Dr. Soepomo, S.H., Janturan, UH,
Yogyakarta
Telp: +62-274-563515 ext 3114, Fax: +62-
274-564604
Email: confast@uad.ac.id website:
http://confast.org
The 2016 Conference on
Fundamental and Applied
Science
for Advanced Technology
- Major issues
1. No problem statement
2. No methodology

- Minor issues
1. No in-text citation even though there is some references at the end
2. Should be carefully put abbreviation

The 2016 ConFAST secretariat


Faculty of Science, Universitas Ahmad
Dahlan
Jln. Prof. Dr. Soepomo, S.H., Janturan, UH,
Yogyakarta
Telp: +62-274-563515 ext 3114, Fax: +62-
274-564604
Email: confast@uad.ac.id website:
http://confast.org