Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Melanie Gamache
Brandon University
030060
Leadership has traditionally focused on the actions and emotions of the leader.
Leadership training exists because leaders are not simply born and success is more than just
leadership focuses on individual leaders developing their skills using empirically proven
strategies for inspiring, supporting, and leading change within a school system. Leadership
theories, including instructional, transformational, servant, feminist, queer, distributive, and post-
colonial leadership, elicit change through tweaking of a stable system and blowing up the box
for all out school reform. Many leaders and leader-candidates identify naturally with one, two,
The leadership theories discussed in this paper are not an exhaustive list and certainly do
not aim to capture the essence of an effective leader in a box. Generally, there are two kinds of
leadership: one that puts the leader at the center of the system and one that removes the
hierarchical structure of leadership. One could imagine the seven theories on a kind of
continuum of forceful leadership direction and a leader may be effective on several places on that
continuum. It is the educational context and the leaders understanding of that context that
The instructional leadership theory occupies one end of the continuum in terms of force
and top-down direction. High expectations, a focus on academic goals measured clearly through
time and data may work best in schools needing an initial shove in the desired direction through
235). This leadership stance is successful when a clear mission for the school is articulated and a
positive culture supports change in the staff. School systems and staff that become stagnant,
LEAD LEARNER 3
toxic, or stuck may respond to change through a leaders motivation or incentives for
Slightly less directive, but still relying on the focused mission, is the transformational
leadership stance. The leader behaves admirably and supports change as a mentor or coach.
Group and individual needs are identified by the leader and through charismatic appeal, trust,
and a focus on the mission, change is supported and staff self-awareness is developed. This type
of leadership enables followers to join the mission while the leader models the way.
leadership. Still focused on an individual as a leader, this leadership theory shifts slightly away
from the hierarchical top-down approach and instead encourages the development of a
democratic learning climate. (Crippen, 2005, p. 2). Servant leadership is marked by a strong
belief in humanity; by meeting the needs of individuals on a basic level and modelling desired
behaviours, followers will be wiser, freer, and more likely to become servants themselves.
(Crippen, 2005, p. 4). These leaders inspire others to follow and enable others to act by
understanding the groups needs to be met and quietly, behind the scenes, acts as the first among
equals. (Crippen, 2005, p. 4). What marks this theory as different from transformational
leadership is the quiet, equal approach the leader takes with his or her followers. It is emotional
leadership by way of empathetic awareness, persuasion and stewardship. These are the leaders
Somewhat parallel with servant leadership, one might suggest, is feminist leadership.
Although described by Dawn Wallin as a fringe stance of leadership (2016), feminist leadership
still puts a leader at the center and through this stance, transformational social change happens
not only by recognizing social injustice, but also gender injustice (Batliwala, 2010, p. 11).
LEAD LEARNER 4
Srilatha Batiwala acknowledges that all forms of leadership involve a hierarchical significance
(p. 18) and the feminist stance is not any different. Feminist leaders have a strong sense of duty
and strive to inclusively focus on individual needs and societal concerns. Values are placed on
bringing marginalized individuals or problems to the center in order to deal with them by
empowering others. This type of leader is a doer, and through a nurturing character, feminists
collective decision-making, and above all, relationship building. (Batliwala, 2010, p. 7).
Also an advocate for social justice changes and a support for collaboration and alliance
within leadership is the queer leadership stance. Jocelyn Dumaresq concedes that no distinct
theory of queer leadership has been developed, (p. 30), while Dawn Wallin emphasized this
leadership concept also on the fringes (2016). The nature of this type of leadership, like the
feminist stance, is based in empathy, and often these types of leaders have experienced
students, (Dumaresq, 2014, pp. 2-3) in order to heal social injustices. This leadership stance
supports alliance within other groups, particularly within the school system, power is generally
generated from an individual. This power is used to create equity within the system by
disrupting the dominant discourse (Dumaresq, 2014, p. 102) and challenging societal norms.
The last leadership stance within the continuum of leader-centered theory is distributive
leadership. This stance is on the opposite end of the spectrum relative to instructional leadership
as the concept is not focused on a forceful, top-down approach rather a ground-up, collaborative
within the system. Through empowerment, democracy, and autonomy, the leadership changes
hands depending on individuals or professional learning communities (PLCs), who have the
LEAD LEARNER 5
expertise or plan to challenge and change the system (Harris, Leithwood, Day, Sammons, &
Hopkins, 2007, p. 338). In order for this type of leadership to be effective, strong PLCs must be
developed, expertise must exist within the system, and the model must be well planned. This
may not be an ideal model for an at-risk school but relatively stable contexts or those that have a
tighter congruence between values, norms and behaviours of principals and teachers, (Harris,
Leithwood, Day, Sammons, & Hopkins, 2007, p. 340) may find success with this leadership
stance. There is evidence to suggest that teacher involvement in decision making processes and
the contribution of strong collegial relationships, (Harris, Leithwood, Day, Sammons, &
Hopkins, 2007, p. 340) is important to school improvement and change. Because the leadership
is shared, there is not an individual who leads while others follow as in the other leadership
stances described in this section, but there does exist a hierarchy of power, which is why it is
included within this continuum of leader-focused theories. The hierarchy of power is evidenced
when some teachers are disrespected or disregarded because they do not carry the same authority
as others, meaning despite the sharing on which the model relies, there are, at specific times,
The post-colonial leadership theory is a concept Ive placed beyond this continuum
because it does not function within a hierarchical power structure and there is not a focus on
individual leadership. This stance is on the fringes, in the truest sense of the word, and that is
also what makes it such a compelling concept. The post-colonial stance is founded on the
understanding that all communities or systems are viable and sustainable on their own (Clegorne,
2014, p. 4) so in order to lead, a leader must benefit and learn as much, if not more, from the
community. This is done by the community clarifying its values and creating social change for a
more just and equitable society (Clegorne, 2014, p. 5). It is imperative that space[s] and
LEAD LEARNER 6
relationships (Clegorne, 2014, pp. 4-5) based on caring and mutual respect are necessary for
post-colonial leadership to be effective but it is up to the entire community to create that space by
recognizing the strengths of the individuals within the community, supported and empowered by
the leader. Post-colonialism calls privilege to the forefront to disband assumptions as feelings or
perceptions of inequity must be extinguished in order for all individuals within the community to
A leader may be able to implicate social change in an at-risk school using the strong,
focused style and top-down strategy of an instructional leader. I have seen a traditional school
accountable system, where students perform at, or above provincial results on standardized tests
and report feeling safe and receiving of a quality education on annual surveys such as Tell Them
From Me. Most would credit the principal an effective leader of change, myself included, at
least at first. However, if that same principal transitioned to a different school, in a different
division and community to impart the same change, he may find the staff and community do not
shift in the same way, at the same rate, or to the same extent. Certainly, there is something to be
said about the context and location of a school and community that affects the effectiveness of a
leader.
At the COSL summer institute, Dawn Wallin (2016) spoke repeatedly about the fact that
stances and theories are just that: theoretical. The descriptions of the leadership stances in the
previous section are descriptions of theories, not people. It would be foolish and nave to assume
that a leader would embody only one theory and never move out of the box but without
knowledge of other leadership theories, principals, or aspiring leaders, may never know how to
LEAD LEARNER 7
develop themselves outside of the confines of their own experience. This is often the case in
small, rural schools where school leaders are hired from a small pool of applicants and the
desperation of a division to fill a position may supersede a developed and qualified leader. Once
leaders have been successful at promoting social change within their school, it would be equally
foolish and nave to assume that the leader does not need to continue learning or to develop
professionally.
Leadership, as Ive learned from the COSL summer institute, is a product of knowing the
people, the situation, and the history of a particular school and community in addition to having
clear foresight about the desires for the future. Maria Montessori theorized that in order to be
able to teach effectively, the subjects (students) must be clearly observed and understood as
human beings capable of independent thought and moral conscience (Montessori, 1912, pp. 20-
22). This also pertains to effective leadership: in order to lead effectively, the leader must
understand his or her subjects in the school as well as the culture of the community.
The leadership stances I have included on the leadership continuum share the
characteristic of individually focused leadership. This is completely different from the post-
colonial theory of leadership which does not recognize leaders and followers. The individual-
focused stances assume that the service and direction provided by the leader would benefit all the
followers in the system. To assume that service is inherently benign, beneficial, and even
heroic, (Clegorne, 2014, p. 4) is a colonial assumption. History has taught us over and over
again that the systematic assimilation and social obliteration of a culture is never heroic and the
detriment caused by such interaction is felt for generations. Schools and communities have
culture and values and, under this same pretence, an individual leaders forceful, directive, top-
down service is not automatically heroic. Paulo Freire in his book Pedagogy of the Oppressed
LEAD LEARNER 8
notes that dialogue cannot be reduced to the act of one persons depositing ideas in another,
norideas to be consumed by the discussants. (1970, p. 158). This means that the benefit or
necessity of the change the leader is trying to inspire a matter of perspective and cannot be
Fringe stances (i.e. feminist and queer), which typically are characterized by individuals
who have a history of being supressed and marginalized may make one question why the roles
are suddenly reversed? If feminists and queers have felt for centuries that they do not have an
equitable voice or ability to take action, why would that kind of leadership value a model where
an individual, with firm ideals and bias, creates followers and inadvertently marginalized
groups? This kind of leadership still demonstrates a centralized, colonizing approach that can
lead to the marginalization of followers, despite the fact that the feminist and queer stances are
effective leadership that was common was a leaders ability to listen well. Listening in order to
understand anothers perspective is important in inspiring others to join, enabling others to act
towards a shared vision, and encouraging the heart of the school and community. When leaders,
or people with authority, truly listen, the hierarchy of power changes; it becomes more level.
Freire wrote about the power of dialogue and conversation and emphasized the transformational
potential for the world when in praxis, a combination of reflection and action derived through
dialogue (1970, p. 157). In praxis, the oppressed became aware of their situation and could then
make necessary changes. For effective leadership, especially under the post-colonial stance, to
happen, leaders and members of the school and community must dialogue and effectively listen
to understand the reality of the situational present and work together to make changes that
LEAD LEARNER 9
benefit the school and community without the expense of eradicating culture or values important
to the oppressed. The key in Freires work was that the oppressors and the oppressed needed to
leave personal bias and judgement outside of the dialogue, in essence, to level the playing field
and focus on listening, reflecting, and finally taking action for change.
Effective leadership, as described here may be difficult to imagine in practice, but that
may be because leadership often is observed as silent, systematic, strategic, and individually-
focused. When leadership becomes shared in a way that sustains the ways, norms, and values of
a particular group of people, building upon the strengths, bonds, and community that already
Personal Reflection
Prior to the COSL institute, I believed that my observations and experience with
leadership over the past 10 years as a secondary teacher had taught me about the kind of leader I
want to become and the kind I want to avoid at all costs. What I now believe is that leadership is
fluid; it evolves and is dependent upon factors that are out of my control like the location and
The leadership stance that initially resonated with me was servant leadership, mostly
because it described many of the traits that I felt I already possess and believe make a good
educator, leader, and parent. Without really knowing this theory of leadership, I was already
practicing it. When Wallin described the feminist stance, I wasnt particularly drawn to it. In
fact, I even critiqued the fringe theories as being less of a leadership stance and more a lens
through which a leader might flavour his/her directives. Upon delving into the research of
feminist and post-colonial theory, I felt more drawn to both. I appreciate leaders who recognize
LEAD LEARNER 10
and build upon the strengths of others, rather than trying to change them, because that has been
my focus as an instructional coach. I appreciate the feminist theory in that there are parallels to
servant leadership, mainly focusing on individual or group concerns, and using inclusivity and
participation to meet the needs of those in the school and community without needing to take the
credit for it (Batliwala, 2010, p. 18). Again, in my experience as a teacher leader in my school, I
believe I already embody these characteristics. What bothered me about both the servant leader
and the feminist leader, however, was the notion of individual-focused leadership, which is why I
The individuals that I work with on a daily basis as a teacher and instructional coach are
students, teachers, support staff, and the four members of our administration team. My principal
often asks me to fix the instructional delivery or social dynamic of a teacher by instructing and
modelling my own teaching or relationship building style, especially when we first began to
work together. He has clear traits of an instructional leader and I have emphasized that I cannot
fix anyone, nor does anyone need to be fixed. Because my principal is also my mentor, and
handyman. Instead, I observe, I talk with, and I listen intently to the teacher Im asked to work
with to help them reflect on their own values and style in order to understand where they are
coming from. Doing this empowers teachers to recognize their own strengths and shortcomings
so we can work together to learn how to overcome his or her self-identified deficiencies.
My own personal strengths that correspond with servant, feminist, and post-colonial
leadership include a sense of duty to support others, nurturing as opposed to directing, and
believing and finding value in all people rather than changing them. I possess a strong belief in
humanity and humans as inherently good people who want to do the right thing, which, to some
LEAD LEARNER 11
makes me nave. I have experienced working with students who have felt that no one believed in
them, had essentially thrown them away as no good or rotten. Talking and listening as one
realize, and help students realize, their gifts. I have seen complete turn-around in students, who
have taught me about my own privilege and humility when it comes to learning, understanding,
and interacting with other. I understand now that this is the foundation of post-colonial
leadership.
My gift, which was uncovered only through my practice of serving others to develop
their own style and gifts, is optimistically finding the good in people. I believe my natural sense
of humility, kindness, and empathy have shaped my role as a post-colonial, feminist, servant
Because I naturally support from behind instead of lead out in front, my ability to inspire
others to join is less developed. Also to be an effective leader, I must develop confidence in my
abilities to serve and meet the needs of others and confidence in my practice of leading with
equitable power. This confidence really can only be acquired through success and yet the type of
leader that I want to be will not necessarily create results immediately the way an instructional
leadership might. In order to develop confidence, I must continue to revisit my own core values
and the values of others that I work with, to remind myself that my work is encouraging for
others and that I am a catalyst for change in way that is not pushy, intimidating, or that produces
followers.
My goal for personal and professional development is to align my leadership style more
closely to the post-colonial stance. I intend to develop my leadership style through professional
development workshops, professional reading, and attaining my masters degree in order to meet
LEAD LEARNER 12
my professional growth plan objectives of inspiring others using their gifts and values as well as
develop confidence. I also plan to reflect on my actions, interpretations, and learning more
regularly in order to set goals for myself in a similar form as the TIPS method used during the
COSL summer institute. Thinking as reflection is something I do regularly already, but I do not
feel simply thinking is enough for me. Writing it out and then discussing my realizations with a
trusted colleague are what solidifies those concepts for me. By sharing my professional goals
and reflections, I am more likely to make changes in myself that will last and, in turn, develop
my leadership skills.
students and developing my leadership style through them. I intend to practice inspiring their
learning through conversation and reflection so they may recognize their own strengths, values,
and personal areas of challenge so together they can take control of their learning and develop
their own understanding and interpretation. While my role of instructional coach will not be a
formal position for the upcoming school year, I will still support my colleagues professionally
also through conversation and reflection. Through this process, I intend to support my own
References
Batliwala, S. (2010, May). Feminist leadership for social transformation: Clearing the
http://www.dsa.vt.edu/aspirations/symposium/pdf/CL29_Clegorne_Post_Coloni
al_Perspective.pdf
Crippen, C. (2005, December 5). The democratic school: First to serve, then to lead.
Dumaresq, J. (2014). Leading from the closet: Toward a new theory of educational
fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), pp.
221-239. doi:10.1080/15700760500244793
Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007, August 17).
9048-4
LEAD LEARNER 14
& S. Thornton, The curriculum studies reader (pp. 19-31). New York:
Routledge.
Institute. Winnipeg.