Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-- -- - - - - -- - -
6'17 #i 5 I
1948
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government PrinUng Office, Washington 25. D. C. Yearly subscription, $3; (oreign , $4.50:
single copy price varies acco,ding to size. - - - - - - - - - Price 15 cents
AERONAUTIC SYMBOLS
1. FUNDAMENTAL AND DERIVED UNITS
Metric English
Symbol
Abbrevia- Abbrevia-
- Unit Unit
Length ______
-
meter ___________ _______
tion tion
2. GENERAL SYMBOLS
w Weight=mg ,. Kinematic viscosity
u Standard acceleration of gravity=9.80665 m/s2 p Density (mass per unit volume)
or 32.1740 ftJsec 2 Standard density of dry air, 0.12497 kg-m-'-s2 at 15 C
and 760 mm; or 0.002378 Ib-ft-4 sec2
m Mass=W Specific weight of "standard" air, 1.2255 kg/ms or
g
I Moment of inertia=mk'. (Indicate axis of 0.07651 lb/cu ft
radius of gyration k by proper subscript.)
Coefficient of viscosity
3. AERODYNAMIC SYMBOLS
.
. ..
'.
"
. ,'...
\ '.
:. .:' .
National Advisory COlnlnittee for Aeronautics
Headquarters, 1724 F Street NW, Washington 25, D. C.
Cr eated by act of ongress approyed 1{arch 3, 1915 , for th e up ervision and direction of the scientific study
of the problems of flight (U . S. Code, t itle 50, sec. 15 1) . It memb ership wa inc-rea ed to 17 by act approved
ll ay 25 , 1948. (Public Law 549, Olh COllgl'e s) . The members are appointed by the President, and se rve as
uch without comp ensation.
J ERO~ ", C . H UNSA KER, Sc. D., Cambridge, i(ass., Chairman
AI~ I,XAND lm \Y ETMORE, C. D., Secr etary, Smith~olliall lll :lti t ution , Vice Chai1'lnan
HON. JOliN R. ALISON, Assi. tant Scc- r etar y of Commer ce. EDWARD i\1. P OIER., i\Iajor Gener al, Un i ted t ates Air Forcc,
DI, 'I' LI'" \Y. BRONK, PH. D., PrC"iclenl, J ohns H opk i n Un i vC'r sity . A s;;i8tan t C hief of Air taff-4.
h:A RI. T. CO~11'1' ON, PII. D. Chairman, Research and D cve lopm en t J OHK D. PRI CE, Vicc Admiral , nited tates I avy, D eputy
Board, National :\lili b\l'y Establi shment. C hicf of .Naval Operat ion ( Air).
EDWARD r. CONDON, PH . D., Dircctor, Xalional Bureau o f AR'rJl UR E . R AY,\l O ' I) , ;\L S., Vice Presid ent , Bngincerin g,
tandards . Dou g las Aircraft Co., In c.
JA~IES 11. DOOUTTI~ E, Sf' . D. , Vice President, SI1('\I Union Oil FRANCIS \V. R E I C IIEI~ I)EHFER, c. D. , Chi f , nited States
Corp . W eather Bureau.
R. M. H AZ Jm, B. i)., Director of Engineering, All ison ])idsion, H ON. D E I~O, \Y . R ENTZE I~ , Administrato r of Civil Aer onautic ,
Gener al Motors Corp. D epartm en t of Commer ce .
\YI LLl.HI LI'l'TLEWOOD, 11. K , Vice President, Engineering, H OYT S. VANDEN BERG, General , C hief of taff, nited State Air
American Airlines, Inc. For ce.
THEODOHJ; C. 1,0 'NQUEST, H ear Admiral, Un i ted States Navy, TH EODORE P. WRI GWI', Sc . D ., Vicc Pre ' iden t for Re.'car ch,
As, istant Chief for Research and Devclopment, Burcau of Corn el l niver si ty.
Aeronautics.
H UG II L. DRYDEN, PII. D., Director oj Aeronautical Research JO liN F. Vr CTORY, LL.M. , Executive ecrelary
JOliN \Y. CROWLEY, JR. , B. S., , Issoeiate Director of Aeronautical Research E. H . C HAMBER IAN, Executive Officer
H ENRY J. E. H ElD, Eng. D., Director, L ang ley A er onautical Laboratory, Lan g ley Field, Va.
S~I I'l'1I J. DEFRANCE, B. S., Dir('ctor, Ames Aeronaut,ical Laboratory, yIoffett Fi eld , Calif.
I';DWA IW H . SIl ARP, Sc. D ., Dircclor, L c wi s Fli gh t Propubion Laboratory, C lel'el allcl Airport, C leveland, Ohio
LANGI.EY AERONAU1' If'AI, LABORATOI{Y, LE\I' JS FLI GIIT PROPULSION LABOHATORY, AM~~s AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY,
Lallgley FicIci, Y a. Cleyeland Airport, C leyeland , Ohio :vI offe tt Field, Calif.
Conduct, tmde,' unified control , for all agencies, of scientific "esearch on the f undame ntal problems of flight
Collection, classification, compilation, and dissemination of scientifi c and technical infor mation on aeronautics
u
REPORT No. 914
S M M ARY however, LhaL cenl rifugal force has liLLIe 01' no e(TeaL on
A tudy was made to determine the e.tfect oj Totation on the mode hape. If Lhi opinion i conect, a sLaLic (nom'oLa ing)
dynamic- tre distribution in vibmting cantileveT beams. The vibration survcy of a blade would 1'e ul t in Lhe location of
Tesult oj a mathematical analysi aTe pTesented togetheT with the high- tre position for the variou naLural mode of
experimental Tesults obtained by means oj troboscopic p hoto- vibration. Furthcrmore, only one static urvey would b
graph and train gage. The theoretical analysis was con- neces aty for a particular type of blade, becau e geometri-
fined to unijo1'1n cantilever beams; the experimental work wa cally imilar blado h ave the arne mode shap e and would
extended to include a tapered cantilever beam to imulate an ther efor e have geometrically imilar high-strB po iLions.
aircrajt propeller blade. Calculations were made on a non- In an effor t to improve the checking of engine-propeller
dimensional basis jor cond- and thiTd-mode vibration; the combina tion and to provide a mean of predicLing vibration
experiments were conducted on b ams oj various lengths , mate- trouble in high- peed tW'bine and compre SOl' , an invesLiga-
1'ial , and cro s sections jor econd-mode vibration. From this t ion wa conducted at the ACA Cleveland laboratory
investigation it was concluded that high vibratoTy-stTess positions during 1945 and 1946 to determine the effect of centrifuO'al
are una.tfected by the addition oj centrijugaljoTce. NonTotating force on the mode hap e and the tress distribuLion of a
vibmtion surveys oj blades ther~fore are valuable in predicting roLating blade v ibra ting at resonance.
high vibmtory-stress locations undeT operating condition The vibration of uniform b eams in a centrifugal-force
field wa m athematically investigated employing a numerical
I TROD CTIO N
m ethod given by M yklestad (reference 3) for the determina-
R onant vibration cau e many of the failure enC01111 tere 1 tion of natural frequencies and mode shape of uch beam .
in aircraft propeller blade and in currently u eel high-speed The problem wa experimentally studied by ubjecting
com pre or and turbine blades. The h[O'h tres e that cau e beams of variou length and materials to rotational peed
Lho e fai lures are brought about by the coinciden e of one of lip to 101 5 rpm while vibrating in eeond mod c. In add ition
Lhe exci ting forces present with one of the natural fl'equ ncies Lo beam of uniform cro ection, a beam of varying cross
of the blade . Considerable progress has been made on the ection, made to simulate a propeller blade, was also stud ied .
tu Jy of re onant vibration with (;he introduction of train Mode shape were obtained from photographs taken using
gage fol' m easuring stre in rotating parts. This method a stroboscopic ligh t ource and stress-eli tribution curves
of mea uring vibratory tre s in propeller blade ha become were obtained with train gage. The result of the strain-
Lhe tandard procedure for determining afe engine-propeller O'age data taken on the tapered beam (nomotaLing) were
combinations. The r e ul t obtained in this manner, how- compared wi th imilar data obtained on a propeller blade to
ever, have orne times proved un atisfactory becau e mi - determine the similari Ly in properties of the taper d beam
leading data have re ulted from the improper location of the and of a propeller blade.
train gage. Many prop 11 r-blade fatigu e failures have
M ATH EM ATI CAL P ROCEDURE AND RESULTS
occurr ed on endurance te t tands although the engin e-
propeller combination had been pronounced safe on the basis A convenient method of determining frequencie and
of 1'C ul t obtained with train-gagc vibration survey. uch mode shapes of rotating beam, such as propeller blades,
Jailures indicate a n eed for a better method of locating strain helicopter ro tor , and turbine blade, is given in reference 3.
O'aO'es on propeller blades. Th e train gage can be properly This method involve ubstituting a cries of point rna es
located if the location of th e high vibratory-stres po ition and massless spring for the beam. The point masses are
can be determined. o selected tha the ma distribution of the substituLe
Th e addition of entrifugal force cau se a con iderabl ystem r epresents an approximation of the rna distribution
change in the natural frequ n ie of a propeller blad . of th e actual beam. imilarly, the pl'ings are elected to
R efer nce 1 tate and theoretical calculations in reference r epro ent an approximation of the ela tic di tribution of he
2 imply that eentrifugal force also changes the mode hape beam . Angular and linear deflections of each substi tu te
and h igh- tress po ition of a vibrating blaele. Briti h pring, under the influence of unit loading and unit mom ent,
invesLigators (Morri and H ead , and Piper) maintain, are used as influ nce coefficients in the calculaLion. The
1
2 REPORT O . 914- N"'-TIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AEHONAUTI CS
m eth od of calc ulaLion is an alogous lo Lh e more commonly shown in rlgur e 2. A d l' fkc Lion curve of a ean t ilev er b eam
kl10wn Holzer m ethod of analy zin g Lorsional vibraLion but with no rota tion, as calculated from the th eor etical equn tion
i som ewha t more compli ca ted , p articularly wh en the of reference 4 , i ploLted on th e ame fig we. Fig u.re 3 hows
cfTect of cen trifugal for ce i in trodu ced. The calculation is the same typ e of plo L for third-mod e vibration. Th e
m ad e b y ass umil1"" a n aL ural fr equ en cy and computin g th e 1Iyklc Lad calculation for thi fig m e was mad e wi t h
a ngula r ancl lin ear deflec Lions, poillt by point, pro ceedin g w/p = 0.1 60. T h e Lwo raLios, 0.292 (fig . 2) a nd 0.160 (nO". 3) ,
from th e free end of the beam to th e fixeel end. The a umed r r pre ent a ng ulnr vclo ci ti es approximately 100 p er cenL above
freq uency is an act ual n a tural fr equ ency if the calc ulated th e r ota tive p eecls en counter ed in operaLion and wer e e-
deflection m eet th e end condi tions at the fix ed end. vVi th lec ted to emphasiz e any errect rotation mi gh t h av e on the
kill, th e conect fr equen cy clln b e determined after Lwo or lo cation of cri t ical points in th e defl ec tion Cill've .
three calcula tiorr ' Fig ure 2 indica tes tha L no shift of criLical poinL occm s
bec ause of ro tation.. The mall hiH in ant inode po itions
~ 100
J in fig ure 3 i attribu ted to ins uffi.cient mass- pring combina-
t.,2 1. I I I
S imple- b e am the ory (r e rerence 4)
I I /
1- 0 tions for acc w'acy at this high er modc of v ibraLion.
~ '" 5 0 1- 0 My k lestad method (re rere nce 3) V
~g. ./
Q..O
~
c-'B 0 ~
~ / 1- 0 i a lcu la ted ~ith iimp/~ - bea;' the~ry
:g ~ a t (~/p G. o. (rererence 4 )
() III
,.9! q,-50 ~ ./ \- 0 Co lc u lated w i th My k les tod method
---.::::::::::: --e; l - - a1' wjp G. 160 (ref'erence 3)
~~
~'f.. /
0 -100
o 20 40 60 80 1m // V ~ /
Distance rram f ixed end, p e rce nt [7 "'\: /
FW UHE I. Com pari son of cnlculatC'd second-ITl ode dr fl ('ci 1011 curn's for nonrotatln g uniform
:/ \ j
canti l('\"('1" beam . ~ /'
~ ~!f"
~
20 4 0. 60 80 100
Dis t ance rrom fix ed end, percent
F II'l' RE 2. "ffcct of ccntrifuga l for cc on sccond-mod e de fl cct ion cun'C of u n iform ca ntilc,'cr
bea m.
(a) Rota tional speecl , 10 15 rpm ; frequency, 57.9 cycles p I' seco nd.
(b) Rota tional speecl , 536 rpm ; rrequellcy, 44.7 cyclcs per second.
F IG t;HE 6.- Cantilc\el beam enclosed in plastic box to eliminat rolational aeroclyna mi c FIGURE
(c) Rotational Sl ecd , 0 rpm; frequency, 38.6 cycles pel' s cond o
.
7.-Stroboscopie photographs of uniform calltilc\-er steel beam fixecl at center of
clamping eflect. rotation and dbrating- in second mod a at variOlls s peeds or rotalion.
:;;)7 3- 50- -2
4 REPORT O . 914- KATIONAL ADYISORY CO MMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS
I
in thc transparent plastic box to eliminate any effcct of ~ "
~ ... ~ , , l , l l 1 tIl I I I I I I I J
W,'! . _. ---.--- '.
(30 /
/
-
40 1-
7
{;
o
-40
-- .........
"r---...
c-........... ........
/"
L (a) Hotational speed, 1015 rpm; freq uenc y, 57.9 cycles p r second .
(b) notational speed, 536 rpm; frequency , 44. i cycles per second.
(c) n otational speed, 0 rpm ; frequ ency, 3 .6 cycles p r second.
F JGURf: .9.-. troboscopic photographs of uniform cantilever steel beam enclosed in trailS'
::J (a) parent plastic box fixed at ccnter of rotation and Yibratillg in second mode at yarious
~ -80 s peeds of rotation.
t-o 80
'b
~
t:
",
.,"
"-
80
40
/
/ 40
0 /
b":
y. V
-- ""- i',...
........
t---n
o / /
....
t 0 - 40 /
~
"
<) I----.. /
~
Q. -40 " t---.... /' -80 /
c:- r----... V '"
V) V
(b) Q)
(a)
1-80 .t:
()
111
'"
'()
c: 80
<::: Q)
41
'b 0 - 0
C:l Q) -.....::::.
80 / ~ 40 ~ f<>...
/ J7 " 1'--.
40
'!..
0
i-..
0 / "" N
/ co
o
- t--..
'-...
I----..
.........
r-... V
/
/
III
<J
'-
<lJ
Q.
oj
- 40
en -80
<lJ L
L
/
- --
./::
-80
o
(e )
20
" 40 - ...-/""
60 80 JOO
en (b)
..
(derived from the formula given in r efer ence 5}.
II
' .
wbere
80 /
I /
60~~--~---+---+--~--~--~--+---+---+--+~~
o Experimental points
- -- f = ,; f ;/ + a.55!}! (experim ental .-
! 40
/
/ /
o
~ /'
l5a~-~-+--+--+--~--+--+--4-~~~,,~:~:~-+-~
40
---- -........ '" ~ /'
/ I
r--- I ~
y
- -
(a )
G / ' ,
~52r--+--+--+--~--+--+--4--4~,~~-+--+--~
i
QJ 1/.'
II
~
-
~ j: '1' 80 /1
] .. ~,.. f--+--+--+--+---4
48~-r--r--r--r--r--+~-." (I)
/
~
'I-: 40 /
g
~ 44:~-+--1--1--~-~~-4-~-~~-+--+--+--4
1/' o
'\- 0
/
~ V ~l. - J...,..
" 1'---- ./
/
~ Jr~'
(1)40
1----- V
o 40'~-+--~/'~~+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-~ c: (b )
~-80
Jl ~.V ()
~
~
36:-~__~~-L__~~~~~~L-~~-L__~~~~
o 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
80 /
Rotational speed, rpm
/
FIG{TRE ll.- Yariation of secondmode natural freq uency with rotational speed for uniform /
can tile \'cr stee l beam. >16 inch deep, inch aero 5, and 171 ~ ~6 in ches long wit.h fixed end
40
at cenCcr of rotation,
1
/
o ----t--... /
In order to eliminate any coincidence im'olving t be material 40 """,,- /
constants or dimension , a bras beam of different length and
(e)
'" I'-..... V
cross ection wa used in the second part of th e experiment.
troboscopic photograph of thi beam are prese nted ill
-80
o 20 40 ---6 0 80 /00
DiSTance "from fixed end. percent
figure 12 , D efl ection mea urement made from enlarge- (a) Rotational spced, 998 rpm.
m~nt of gme 12 arc plotted in figure 13 and can be com- (b) Rotational speed, 525 rpm.
(c) Hotationa l peed, 0 rpm.
pared \\-i th the defle ction ClLl'Ve of the uniform cantilever
FIGURE 13.- Experimcntal deflection curves of uniform eantile'" r bra b m fixed at center
teel beam hown in figu re T he identi cal l1atLu'e of t he or rotation and dbrating in second mode while rotatin g at \-arious speeds.
6 REPORT NO . 9 14- NATIONAL ADVI SORY COMMI'fTEE F OR AER O AUT ICS
.....
/
/
S -10 Th e tap ered cantilrver steel beam U ed in thi ex--perime nt
e
QJ
Q
o
(b ) --- :---- /
V
/ \Va so chosen as to r epresen t a typ ical var ia t ion in cross-
section momen t of in ertia along a prop eller blade . In order
to cleten n ine th e degr ee of approximation of the tap er ed
beam to a propeller blade, str a in-gaD"e meaS LU'emen ts wer e
made alon o' th e m aximum camber li ne of a hollow steel
prop eller blade Yibr ating in second mode. Th ese tre
80 / m eas Lll'em ents are plotted in fig m e 16 togeth er wit h th e
/ . tr es distrib ution of the tap ered can tilev r steel bea m .
40
V
---
DIS CUSSIO N
/
o / A comparison of th,e curve pr e entecl in fig ure 17 , based on
/ experimen tal an cl calculated r es ults, ind ica te that the intro-
(e)
- 40 duction of centri fugal for ce h a no effect on the maximum
o 20 40 60 {JO / 00
Disfance from fixecl end, p erc en t dynamic-str es locations in a vi br ating can tilever b eam fi...xed
(a) RotaLional speed. 1010 rpm. at th center of r otation wi thin t he inve t igated peecl r ange.
(b) HotaLional s peed, 5O:l q )m . The general sha.p c of the deflection CLU've, in pa rticular t hc
(c) HotaLional speed, 0 rpm.
location of node po itions, is al 0 unaffected by r ota tion
FroURE 15.-Experi mcntal deflection curves or tapered ca nti lc,"c'!' s teel bea m fixed at center
of rotat ion and ,"f ibraLing in second mode while rotating ::1L various s pec(s.
although r elative amplit ud es YRry; that is, the ampli t ud e of
an tinode loops r ela.tive to tip ampli tud e decr ease wi th
phy ical constan t of th e material or t he d imen ion h aye no increa ing rota.tion al p eed. B ecau e nod e and maXimLUl1-
effect on th e ela tic CUl've of a vibrating uniform cantilever dynami c- tr e location ar e invarian t, sta tic-bending-
b am . Thi conclusion i valid for both sta tionary and ro- vibration SUl"vey of beams that will b e sub eq uen tly sub j ected
tating beams. to vibratory force in a cen trifugal-force field will locate cr itical
D efl ection CUTves for the taper ed can tilever ted b eam ,,-er e ar ea for strain-gage locatio n in rotary testing. This
EFFECT OF CENTRIF GAL FORCE ON THE ELASTIC CURVE OF A VIBRA'l' ING CAN'r ILEVER BEAM 7
100
o Experimental pOin ts
I - o Calculated with simple-beam theory
I J / l. Node po iLions a nd maximum-yibraLory-sLres 10caLiODS
o 20 40 60 80 /00
REFERENCES
Distance from fixed end, percent
(a) Angular freq uency ratio, o.
(b) Angular frequ !lcy ratio, 0.292. 1. Theodor en, T.: Propeller Vibration and the Effect of t he Centrifu-
gal Force. NACA T N No. 516,1935.
FIGURE l7.-Comparison of theoretical and ex perimental cur ves showing secondmode
deflections of uniforrn cant.ilc,"or beam (or t.wo rotatio ns. 2. Ramb erg, Wal ter, and Levy, Sam: Calculation of Stre ses and
Natu ral F requencie for a Rota t in g Propeller Blade Vibra ting
Fl exurally. R es . Paper 114, Ja t. Bill". t anclarcl Jour. Res.,
proceduTe will decr ease the po ibility of misleading lata
vo l. 21, no. 5, Nov. 193 , pp. 639- 669.
because of improperly located str ain gage 3. Mykle tad, N. 0.: Vibration Analy i . McGraw-Hill Book Co.,
Inc., 1944, pp. 210--21 4.
CO CLUSIO S 4. Timo henko, S.: Vibration Problems in Engineerin g. D. Van
Nostran d Co ., In c., 2d ed., 1937, pp. 331- 345.
'""0 important conclusion may b e drawn on the ba i of 5. D en H ar tog, J . P . ; M echanical Vibration. McCraw-Hi ll Book
th tudy of beams vibrating in a centrifugal-force field: Co., I nc., 2d ed ., 1940, p . 310.
' .....
z
Positive directions of axe a and angles (forces and moments) are shown by arrows
5. NUMERICAL RELATIONS
1 hp=76.04 kg-m/s=550 ft-Ib/sec 1 Ib=0,4536 kg
1 metric horsepower=O.9863 hp 1 kg=2.2046 lb
1 mph=0.4470 mps
1 mi=1,609.35 m=5,280 It
1 mps=2.2369 mph
1 m=3.2808 ft