You are on page 1of 6

Strategic Pricing

Tackling Price Erosion in the


Medical Products Marketplace
By Lisa Thompson

$
$
uccessfully pricing products and
services is one of the biggest chal-
lenges sales and marketing profes-
sionals face in companies of all
sizes. Convincing customers that
they should pay the price is an even bigger
challenge. Consider the following questions
■ Are more customers negotiating price
than ever before?
■ Is it difficult to convince customers
of the value of your products and
services?
■ Do you use price as a last resort to
retain customers when selling on
value fails?
$
$ to help determine the success, or failure, of ■ Are you worried that customers might find out
about the price differences among them?
your company’s pricing strategy.
If you answered “yes” to many of these questions, you are not alone. Some of
the most successful companies face the same challenges. That’s the good
news. The bad news is that your company loses money every day — money
that is left on the table when you negotiate ineffectively and money that is
sent to your competitors when customers leave because you cannot meet
their needs.

Nowhere is this loss more acutely felt than in the medical products industry.
Changes in Medicare, Medicaid and managed care have decreased reim-
bursement levels for many product categories. Long-term care and acute care
customers are experiencing severe financial difficulties that are driving them
to squeeze suppliers. Customer mergers & acquisitions, coupled with the

$
widespread growth of participation in group purchasing organizations

$
(GPOs), have led to fewer and larger customers with seemingly immense pur-
chasing power that can make or break a supplier.

Unfortunately, this is the unchangeable reality of the medical products mar-


ketplace. To address this problem, it is important to understand how reactive
pricing and negotiating practices cause us to lose control of our pricing, and
to learn how to implement strategies proactively that enable us to retain as
much pricing leverage as possible in this marketplace.

Flawed Approaches Predominate Today


There are two primary flaws in the way most companies price and negotiate
with customers today: Both have a significant impact on the outcome of price
negotiations, and both, if not correctly addressed, can translate to a signifi-
cant loss in the negotiation process. Companies need to avoid:

■ Negotiating prices based on what customers say


they are willing to pay, and

■ Attaching prices to the wrong things.

Negotiating Prices Based on What


Customers Say They Are Willing to Pay
This practice actually causes customers to reduce what they will pay. Experi-
enced sales people know that different customers value similar products and
services differently. Many managers respond to this reality by trying to deter-

$
mine what customers will pay — either by asking them directly during a
negotiation or by using market research techniques to uncover it. This is a
problem for several reasons.

One problem is that some customers don’t know what they should be willing
to pay. Customers do not always understand the impact a product can have
on their bottom line, particularly when the product is innovative. Often sup-
pliers do not help customers understand value because they talk only about
features and benefits — for example, marketing and selling based on a unique
feature, such as a new hip replacement made of a special titanium alloy, or a
benefit, such as a special titanium alloy that is five times less likely to crack
than the old material. Still, a purchasing administrator may not understand
how the titanium alloy affects the hospital’s bottom line and why he should be
willing to pay more for it than for the old material. Even in mature product cat-
egories when the core product has become a commodity, customers do not
always understand how the extra services you provide affect their businesses.

Another problem is that even if customers do understand the value of your


products, they may be reluctant to share that information if they think it will
affect the price. Many suppliers have trained customers to negotiate on price
by lowering prices every time a customer demands tomers learn that some paid a lower price for the
it. As a result, many customers demand a better same thing, which included the commodity product
deal, even if they think that your first offer repre- plus the availability of the services. They demand
sents good value for the money. If they feel another the lower prices as well, feeling that you have
client is getting a better deal still, they will ask why unfairly exploited them by charging them higher
they aren’t getting it too. prices simply because they needed the service
more than another customer did.
Finally, allowing your sales force to use price as a
deal closer disregards their potential to sell on In addition, offering the service as a free add-on
value. Effective marketing and sales strategies can leads customers to treat it as if it costs nothing to
change what customers are willing to pay if they offer. If you offer free emergency delivery, your cus-
help customers see the value of your entire prod- tomers may decide they don’t need to plan their
uct and service package. Meeting a customer’s orders. If you offer free training, they may hire less
price demand is a sure way to book a quick sale. experienced people and rely on you to answer all of
But a value-based sales effort requires an invest- their questions. Even if you can get a higher price
ment of time. A salesperson must understand how for your core commodity, your profits will be
their customer’s business works in order to show devoured by the growing cost of the services you
the customer how they can help them do business have taught customers to expect.
more profitably. They also need to learn who in the
buying organization actually makes the price-value As soon as managers realize this phenomenon is
tradeoffs. Is it really purchasing, or someone else occurring, the business goal shifts from maintain
behind the scenes? Any salesperson measured on prices to maintain share. In many cases, suppliers
achieving revenue, rather than profit goals, would do add value to customers but rarely spend time
be foolish to waste time selling value when two of understanding the dollar value of these services
three sales based on price can be closed in the and activities and rarely, if ever, attach a price to
$
same timeframe. them. Usually, the services are simply “thrown in”
as part of the package for customers who pur-
Attaching Prices to the Wrong Things chase the commodity. While this may help to
When medical product markets mature, a technol- achieve your goal of maintaining share, it does so
ogy that was once viewed as innovative becomes a at great cost to your company. Fortunately, there
commodity. As customers begin demanding lower are better ways to set prices and negotiate them
product prices, claiming parity among competing with customers.
products, suppliers begin looking for innovative
ways to differentiate themselves. Attempting to Strategic Solutions
add value to customers beyond the core tech- In order to avoid confronting the problems out-
nology, suppliers begin offering such services as lined above, medical product manufacturers must
educational programs, 24-hour repair, consulting understand what drives value for various cus-
services, quality control assurance and testing, JIT tomers and use that information to develop a more
delivery and many others. Although this strategy effective pricing strategy and appropriate tactics
could be successful, problems arise when compa- for customer negotiations. This strategy includes:
nies do not understand how to price these product-
service packages. ■ Using metrics for pricing commensurate
with value received.
In most cases, negotiators simply include the added
services to maintain the prices of the core com- ■ Reconfiguring product and service
modity product. This is usually ineffective because packages to meet customer’s needs.
not all customers have the same business model,
and as a result, they receive different amounts of ■ Communicating the value of every
value from the same product and service package. aspect of the product and service
If you think of your product and service package as package.
an indivisible bundle, the customers who receive
the least value from the added services will contin- Using Metrics for Pricing
ue to demand the commodity price. Unless your Commensurate with Received Value
company is willing to lose share, you resort to low- Determining what to price is one issue, determining
ering price. What happens then is that other cus- how to price is another. What you should price are
the aspects of your customer package that drive value,
whether they are products or services. Jack Welch
employed this strategy effectively at GE in the late
$
not all of them will receive the same value from a par-
ticular service or feature. Managers, in an attempt to
solve this problem, usually offer customers a relatively
1980s. He transformed GE’s strategy from product cen- fixed package of products and services and negotiate
tered to customer solutions centered by competing the price to reflect differences in value. The problem
aggressively on the core offering and adding valuable with this strategy is that when customers learn that
services which customers paid for. He did this so effec- they can pay different prices for the same package,
tively, that several services were spun off into profit- they cease making price and value tradeoffs when pur-
generating businesses for GE, such as GE Capital. In chasing and simply begin demanding the lowest price
business-to-business markets, with few exceptions, for the products and services they need.
customers have difficulty acknowledging the value of
things that do not have a price attached. The fact that different customers derive different value
for the same package is a fact that cannot be changed.
How products and services are priced should be driven However, a more effective solution to this problem is to
by how customers derive value from using them. Con- offer flexible packages with fixed prices associated with
sider the case of a pharmaceutical gas manufacturer each package. As one example, a nourishment product
that was considering traditional pricing metrics for the manufacturer sells to hospitals in a variety of geo-
product at launch, that is, leasing equipment to hospi- graphic locations. These products are often the only
tals and charging them per canister of gas purchased. source of food for some patients, which makes the
After interviewing customers (hospitals) to understand availability and reliability of product delivery of para-
how purchase decisions were made and what drove mount importance. This is not a problem in large cities
value, the manufacturer realized that smaller patients since there are many local distributors with stock on
consumed smaller amounts of the gas per hour of ther- hand. In smaller towns and rural locations, the avail-
apy than larger patients did. However, the severity of ability of quick emergency delivery is crucial. Ready
the illness and, in turn, the value of the therapy, was availability from a variety of distribution sources is so
unrelated to the size of the patient. Management later important that, in many cases, rural customers are will-
decided that a much better pricing metric was minutes ing to pay more to a manufacturer who can promise
of usage because the value of the gas increases or delivery when needed. It is also more costly for manu-
decreases based on the amount of time that the patient facturers to deliver to these locations. Given the high
requires the therapy. A high price per canister may value to customers and the high cost for manufacturers,
have eliminated hospitals requiring only small amounts it makes sense for the manufacturer to charge a lower
of the gas, while a low price per canister may have left price for the product itself with different prices associat-
significant amounts of money on the negotiating table ed with different delivery options. This way, a customer
with hospitals treating patients who require more
gas. Pricing based on minutes of usage allowed
customers who receive high value to receive a
higher price and customers who receive low value
to receive a low price.

Other types of pricing metrics include per usage


fees or flat fee pricing. Since many medical product
suppliers are being pressured to participate in
risk-sharing arrangements, pay-for-performance is
an effective pricing metric in many cases. The bot-
tom line is to choose a metric that tracks with
value in order to capture a fair share of that value
you create for customers.

Reconfiguring Product and Service


Packages to Meet Customer’s Needs
Once appropriate pricing metrics are determined,
product and service packages must be configured
to meet the needs of various types of buyers. Since
customers compete differently in their markets,
who prefers a low price can receive one only if he’s will- thought following regulatory approval. Once a market
ing to wait for delivery. For those who value immediate has been established, making drastic changes from the
delivery, a higher price is attached (Figure 1). prevailing price levels in the industry can be very chal-
lenging. However, even for mature product categories,
This change may involve a significant cultural shift in the EVE™ tool is no less powerful or useful in communi-
the way suppliers negotiate because it requires the sup- cating the value of a product and service package and
plier to stop thinking of their product and service pack- slowing the further erosion of price in the industry.
age as an indivisible bundle, and instead offer several
combinations of products and services. This approach EVE™ can be a powerful tool during customer negotia-
enables the right product to be offered to the right cus- tions because it is realistic. It forces you to acknowl-
tomer at the right price. Additionally, it sends an impor- edge your advantages and disadvantages relative to
tant message to your customers: negotiations are not your next best competitor and to translate those differ-
about how skillfully you negotiate. They are about mak- ences into real dollars for customers. It also it redirects
ing price and value tradeoffs. the customer negotiation. Customers often focus solely
on how much it costs them to acquire your products
Communicating the Value of Every Aspect and services. Discussing economic value with them
of the Product and Service Package allows you to show customers how much its costs
Understanding what drives value for various customers them NOT to do business with you. Unfortunately, it is
is a necessary first step in developing a successful com- not enough simply to communicate value to customers,
munication and negotiation strategy. Here, value refers you must convince them to pay for it. This is accom-
to economic value — the effect, in dollars, that your plished by pricing every aspect of your customer pack-
company has on a customer’s bottom line relative to age, communicating the value of each, and forcing cus-
the customer’s next-best competitive alternative. This tomers to make tradeoffs among them in order to find
means understanding how your entire product and ser- the price-value combination for them.
vice bundle either saves cost for a customer or drives
additional revenue. The Economic Value Estimation™ Strategic pricing is not simply about “getting the right
(EVE™) tool provides an effective and realistic way to price.” It is about orchestrating the entire marketing
understand customer value (Figure 2). function to create value that can profitably be captured
in the price. Although developing a sound pricing strat-
Unfortunately, most medical product suppliers forego a egy is the cornerstone of profitability, it is only a first
perfect opportunity to collect economic value informa- step. Executing that strategy successfully in the field
tion concurrently during product clinical trials. Most requires that the strategy be developed in conjunction
companies set prices and launch products as an after- with a realistic implementation plan. While the trends
and dynamics of the medical markets in
which you compete are unchangeable, with a
solid strategy as a foundation and the suc-
cessful tools for implementation, you can
ensure that you capture a fair share of the
value you create for your customers.

Lisa Thompson is a director at Strategic Pricing


Group, Inc. (SPG, Marlborough, Massachusetts)
where she also serves as the healthcare practice
manager. At SPG, Lisa uses her knowledge of sever-
al industries including high tech, media and adver-
tising and healthcare to meet clients’ requests. She
has extensive experience in all aspects of the
healthcare field. Lisa serves on the board of direc-
tors for the ODWIN Learning Center in Boston, a
non-profit organization that trains lower-income
adults for successful careers in the healthcare indus-
try. She holds an MBA from the F.W. Olin Graduate
School of Business at Babson College and has expe-
rience in the areas of marketing, sales, and sales
management. Contact her at 508-481-9775, ex.239,
or at lthompson@spgboston.com.

Reprinted with permission from the Spring 2000 issue of MIIR (Medical Industry Information Report).
© Nicholas Communications, Inc. 28570 Marguerite Parkway, Suite 211, Mission Viejo, CA 92692. Phone: 949-365-8021; www.miirmagazine.com
65 Boston Post Road West Marlborough, MA 01752
T: 508.481.9775 F: 508.303.2241 E: spgboston.com

You might also like