1) Im with the opinion that to established the matter as a new construction instead of

upgrading works require an opinion from the recognised authorize person / body
within the job frame work. None of the case through my research manage to
distinguish between this two.

However, whether the matter fall under Sec 13 or not, TNB still did not enter LO
1250 with proper procedure as stated in Sec 11. Section 13 emphasize that stated
...dengan menyebabkan seberapa sedikit kerosakan yang mungkin dan membayar
pampasan penuh mengikut Sec 16 kepada semua orang yang berkepentingan........

TNB may only manage to identified ....orang berkepentingan through procedure in

Section 11.

2) By referring to the report prepared by the Jurukur

3) By referring to the report prepared by the Jurukur

4) ... I dont get the question Datuk.

5) The fact of encroachment is there-back dated rental to the land is liable to the be paid
by TNB

6) The person who declared the Statutory Declaration is still alive and it is solemnized
before a commissioner of oath