You are on page 1of 54

Application of Information Systems in

Supply chain management of Agora

I|Page
Executive Summary
RAHIMAFROOZ group is one of the largest conglomerates in the country with businesses in
pharmaceuticals, agriculture, consumer products etc. However, AGORA is a business unit of
RAHIMAFROOZ logistics. AGORA is the largest retail company in Bangladesh currently
holding a share of 35% of the retail industry. Inaugurated in 2008, AGORA now has over 46
outlets and 1600 employees spread across the country.

AGORA enjoys a higher amount of market share than its competitors such as Agora and
Meena bazaar. Agora and Meena Bazar entered this industry earlier mostly because of visionary
leadership and innovative strategies employed by the company. Even though Meena Bazaar,
Agora hold several advantages over AGORA. None of these companies have been able to
emulate the success of AGORAs business model and market positioning. AGORAs brief
history is fraught with challenges, successes, and ups and down.

The organization structure of AGORA is conventional. One of the advantages AGORA has
over its competitors is the procurement department which is responsible for directly sourcing
vegetables, meat, fruits and grains directly from wholesale markets. Other participants in the
market rely on vendors for fresh produce requirements, which make quality control extremely
difficult.
Contents
CHAPTER1: Introduction..................................................................................................... 5
1.1. Background of the Study.......................................................................................... 5
1.2. Objectives of the study:............................................................................................ 5
1.3. Limitations of the study............................................................................................ 7
CHAPTER 2: Literature Review........................................................................................... 9
CHAPTER 3: Research Methodology & Sample Design....................................................11
3.1 Methods................................................................................................................... 11
3.2 Sources of Data....................................................................................................... 11
3.3 Data Collection Techniques...................................................................................... 11
3.4 Sampling.................................................................................................................. 12
3.4 Sample Size............................................................................................................. 13
3.6 Data Analysis Software............................................................................................ 13
3.7 Data Analysis Tools/ Techniques.............................................................................. 13
CHAPTER4: Data analysis and Findings...........................................................................15
Supply Support practice (SSP)....................................................................................... 15
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)..................................................................19
Information System (IS)................................................................................................. 22
Quality Service (QS)...................................................................................................... 26
Risk and Reward (RR).................................................................................................... 29
Supply Chain Integration (SCI)....................................................................................... 31
Flexibility Performance (FP)........................................................................................... 34
Resource Performance (RP)........................................................................................... 38
Output Performance (OP).............................................................................................. 41
CHAPTER 5: Findings & recommendation........................................................................46
Recommendation........................................................................................................... 46
Reference...................................................................................................................... 48
WEBSITEs:................................................................................................................... 48
Books:......................................................................................................................... 48
APPENDICES.................................................................................................................. 50
Appendix 1:................................................................................................................ 50
Appendix 2:................................................................................................................ 52
About AGORA
Products in AGORA are separated into three master categories; Vegetable, Fruits, Meat and
Grains, Company Goods and Non Food divergence. The company has tens of thousands of stock
keeping units in their portfolio. To make sense of all of these SKUs, each article has its own
unique number and description.
Moreover, each master category is further subdivided into category, subcategory and type
category. These subdivisions great aid the decision making of management and help them to
make sense of thousands of disparate SKUs.

The present ordering and inventory system requires each of AGORAs outlets to send a sales
transfer order based on present days sales to the head office. The procurement department at
the head office then compiles all the demand data from the outlets and instructs the
field procurement teams to purchase the demanded products from the suppliers. Procurement
teams, after purchasing all the required products, deliver them to AGORAs three
distribution centers located at strategic positions across Bangladesh. The management at the
distribution center in turn generates and provides a Goods Received note to the procurement
department acknowledging the transfer of goods.

From this point on, the distribution centers sort the products according to each outlets demand
as presented by the sales transfer order.
After sorting the products according to outlet demand, the distribution centers deliver the
demanded products to all AGORA outlets.
Lastly, each outlet generates and delivers a Goods Received note to the relevant distribution
centre acknowledging the receipt of goods.

II | P a g e
CHAPTER1: Introduction

1.1. Background of the Study


RAHIMAFROOZ group is one of the largest conglomerates in Bangladesh with interests and
stakes in varied fields. Previously, RAHIMAFROOZ was called Imperial Chemical Industries
(ICI). RAHIMAFROOZ was founded after Bangladeshi investors in ICI managed to obtain
majority stakes in ICIs Bangladeshi operations. AGORA, a concern of RAHIMAFROOZ group
established in 2008 is an integral part of the overall RAHIMAFROOZ group. It represents and
exemplifies RAHIMAFROOZs commitment to bring about a better Bangladesh and be a
catalyst to change the lives of millions of individuals for the better. AGORA, with its 46 retails
stores, situated in strategic positions around Bangladesh is the largest retail chain in the
country with over 35% markets share of the growing 1500 crore taka retail industry.

This study will look into the varied strategies developed and implemented by AGORA to
achieve its Supply chain management relations & dominant position in the marketplace.
Some of the strategies were developed as a result of market dynamics, while others were
developed as a result of desperation. An in depth study of strategies used by retail chains have
not been done in Bangladesh previously. The increasing importance of understanding supplier
relation to sustain in market place with best quality and its growing penetration into many
aspects of peoples lives demands a thorough study on this subject matter.

This paper is organized as follows. Chapter 2 presents SCM with a brief description from the
view of SCM philosophy. Chapter 3 provides the methodology of the paper. The strategy used
when designing a questionnaire form in terms of understanding and the attitudes of main partners
of Agora with special emphasis on their relationship to their suppliers and clients, was
explained. Chapter 4 presents the survey results which were analyzed by using SPSS software.
Chapter 5 includes the conclusion part of this study consists of some recommendations to further
this research in the future.

1.2. Objectives of the study:


Our purposes were to learn through practical application, about supply chain management and
their implementation in Agora super-shop.

Hence, some other objectives are stated below:

To figure out their perception regarding Supply Chain Management.


To know about their implementation procedure of Supply Chain Management.
To figure out the advantages of Supply Chain Management.
To figure out the obstacles in implementing Supply Chain Management.
To know about Counteraction against obstacles while implementing Supply Chain
Management.

III | P a g e
1.3. Limitations of the study
Though we put our best effort to fulfil our determined objectives, still there were some
limitations we had to go through-

Books on this issues are very few in number


Very limited time which it needs much time for preparing term paper
We were not allowed to go out for data collection during pick hours.
No momentary allocation
The area on this term paper is very big but we had to finish the work within a very short
phase.
As our sample size was small, our findings might not be fully accurate.
IV | P a g e
CHAPTER 2: Literature Review
Supply Chain Management
The whole chain from producing a raw material to selling the product to the firm i.e. retail
merchant is ascribed as a supply chain. Several companies take part in an organization for
creating a product and transmitting it to the end user. Chopra and Meindl (2007) described the
supply chain as consisting of the parties who are involved in satisfying the customer demands.
The members of supply chain are not limited to the manufacturers and suppliers. Warehouses,
retailers, transporters and customers are all players of supply chain. The sample of La Londe and
Masters (1994) defined the supply chain more clearly as one firm producing a raw material and
selling it to the second firm which then uses raw material and turns it to a component. The third
firm buys this component from the second firm and assembles the component into a product sold
to the fourth firm which might be a wholesale distributor. This firm distributes the product to the
retail merchants who finally sell this product to the end users (customers). The set of firms which
pass these materials forward can be referred to as a supply chain.

Mentzer et al. (2001) listed several activities which should be established by firms to behave
consistently with the SCM philosophy. In this research, the focused activities are;
integrated behavior, mutually sharing information, cooperation and partners building and
maintaining long-term relationships. Integrated behavior and cooperation with clients and
suppliers are highly recommended to meet mutual expectations in the long-term (Mentzer et
al., 2001). Partners building and maintaining long-term relationships are required for
increasing the effectiveness of SCM (Mentzer et al., 2001). Lee (2004) suggested that
collaborative relationships should be developed with suppliers and customers so that
companies work together to design or redesign processes, components and products as well as
preparing backup plans.
Thomas and Griffin (1996) explained that Supply Chain Management (SCM) is the
management of material and information flow both in and between fRahimafroozlities, such
as vendors, manufacturing and assembly plants and distribution centers.

It is very important to take into consideration the responsiveness of the supply chain while
designing the supply chain which is basically enabled by sustained information flow (Chopra and
Meindl, 2007). In addition, information flow has a direct impact on the scheduling, inventory
control and delivery plans which are fundamental elements for the coordination of members in a
supply chain (Lee et al., 1997). The supply chain strategy of many companies depends on getting
quicker response rate at consumer flow, since it has tremendous effect to optimize the companys
performance. So, a supply chain management strategy should be developed to attain the ultimate
goals of the company; providing a competitive advantage. In this paper, the existence of effective
collaboration within and beyond the boundaries of a company which is essential to convert
competitive advantage into profitability was sought.
V|Pa ge
CHAPTER 3: Research Methodology & Sample Design

This chapter examines the research methodology which generally means the selected methods of
achieving the research objectives. To be more precise, it primarily focuses on the method(s) of
data collection along with the justification of using the method(s). It also includes basic
parameters to be chosen related to the selected method(s). In addition to that, the instruments for
gathering data also fall within the definition of methodology of a research

3.1 Methods
Assessing and identifying the Supply Chain Management of Agora is a matter of
qualitative judgment.For the purpose of this study, two methods are used namely

i. Content Analysis

ii. Questionnaire Survey

Content Analysis: This includes collecting related information and data from allrelevant books,
documents, published and unpublished research works available, online articles, notes etc

Questionnaire Survey: This survey is intended to gather primary data about the Supply Chain
Management of Agora with a semi-structured questionnaire.

3.2 Sources of Data


The data for this study have been collected both from primary and secondary sources. Secondary
data are drawn from the existing literatures like books, newspaper reports, previous research
works, seminar papers, reports, online etc. Primary data have been collected through
questionnaire survey. The respondents included the production Manager, Assistant manager, and
head of sales department and sales operator who are directly related with Supply chain
operations of Agora.

3.3 Data Collection Techniques


To collect data, in-depth interviews are conducted through close ended semi structured
questionnaire.
3.4 Sampling
Branch managers and operation officers are directly related with supply chain operations. They
well know about their supply chain and how they manage their suppliers. So we took them as our
sample.

VI | P a g e
3.4 Sample Size
Our tram paper is about Supply chain management of Agora super shop. We have to take our
respondents from employees who are directly related with Supply chain including Branch
manager of Chittagong (Nurul Islam Rupok), Head of sales dept. (Natasha Rahman), Branch
manager of comilla (Susanta Babu Sutradhar), Assistant manager of Comilla branch (Md.
Shafiqur Rahman) and Sales Operator (Md. Abdul Hannan). We took five supply chain
experts from different branches of Agora in Bangladesh. They help us through giving raw
information about their supply chain management system. They also told us how they face
problems to manage their suppliers to meet customer satisfaction.

3.6 Data Analysis Software


The collected data have been analysed through SPSS software to arrange raw data and converted
it to information.

3.7 Data Analysis Tools/ Techniques


There are some tools which are used in analysis. These are various figures, tables, charts
(Histogram, Pie chart, Bar chart). These instruments are used in the analysis with the information
we got.

We follow the qualitative survey system. Though our sample size is very few, our data is more
relievable.
VII | P a g e
CHAPTER4: Data analysis and Findings

SECTION C: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Supply Support practice (SSP)


Supply support practices are management methods, practices and procedures employed in
determining requirements of goods and services and their acquisition, receipt, storage, issuance,
and final disposal. Supply support is an important element of integrated logistics support.

SSP1. Few dependable suppliers

Rely on few dependable suppliers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 80.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
VIII | P a g e
SSP2. Consider quality as number one criterion in selecting suppliers

Consider quality as number one supplier selection criterion


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 40.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 80.0
Extremely agree 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

SSP3. Establish long term relationship with its suppliers

Establish long term relationship with its suppliers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 60.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

IX | P a g e
SSP4. Helps its suppliers to improve their product quality

Help suppliers to improve product quality


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely disagree 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 40.0
Most likely agree 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

X|Page
Analyse (SSP1 to SSP4):

By analysing question SSP1, we found that Agora depends on more dependable suppliers as
maximum participants disagree (40%) with the statement their organization rely on few
dependable suppliers.

From SSP2, we found they consider quality as number one criterion in selecting suppliers. As
maximum participants agree (40%) with the statement Consider quality as number one criterion
in selecting suppliers.

From SSP3, we found their answer is neutral with the statement Establish long term relationship
with its suppliers. As 40% most likely agree and same percent most likely disagree with the
statement.

From SSP4, we found they help their suppliers to improve their product quality. As maximum
participants most likely agree (60%) with the statement Helps its suppliers to improve their
product quality

Customer Relationship Management (CRM)


Customer relationship management (CRM) is a term that refers to practices, strategies and
technologies that companies use to manage and analyse customer interactions and data
throughout the customer lifecycle, with the goal of improving business relationships with
customers, assisting in customer retention and driving sales growth.

CRM1. Interacts with customers to set its reliability, responsiveness, and other standards

Interacts with customers to sets its reliability, responsiveness


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely disagree 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely disagree 3 60.0 60.0 80.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XI | P a g e
CRM2. Frequently measures and evaluates customer satisfaction

Frequently measures and evaluates customer satisfaction


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Most likely agree 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

CRM3. Frequently evaluates the formal and informal complaints of its customers

Frequently evaluates formal and informal complaints of customers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 60.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XII | P a g e
Analyze (CRM1 to CRM3):

From CRM1, we found Agora doesnt interact directly with customers to set its reliability,
responsiveness and others standards.

From CRM2, we found they frequently measures and evaluate customer satisfaction. As
maximum participants most likely agree (60%) with the statement Frequently measures and
evaluates customer satisfaction.

From CRM3, we found their answer is neutral with the statement Frequently evaluates the
formal and informal complaints of its customers. As 40% most likely agree and same percent
most likely disagree with the statement

Information System (IS)


A combination of hardware, software, infrastructure and trained personnel organized to
fRahimafroozlitate planning, control, coordination, and decision making in an organization.

IS1. Shares its business units proprietary information with its trading partners

Share business units proprietary information with its trading partners


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 80.0
Most likely agree 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XIII | P a g e
IS2. Exchanged information that helps establishment of business planning

Exchanged information helps to establish business plan


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Extremely agree 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XIV | P a g e
IS3. Information exchange between your organization and its trading partners is adequate

Adequate exchange of information with trading partners


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Most likely agree 1 20.0 20.0 60.0
Extremely agree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

Analyse (IS1 to IS3):

From IS1, we found Agora doesnt share its business units proprietary information with its
trading partners.

From IS2, we found that their exchanged information helps establishment of business planning.

From IS3, we found their answer is neutral with the statement Information exchange between
your organization and its trading partners is adequate. As 40% most likely agree and same
percent most likely disagree with the statement

XV | P a g e
Quality Service (QS)
Quality service is an assessment of how well a delivered service conforms to the client's
expectations. Service business operators often assess the service quality provided to their
customers in order to improve their service, to quickly identify problems, and to better assess
client satisfaction.

QS1. Continuous quality improvement program

Maintain continuous quality improvement program


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely agree 4 80.0 80.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

QS2. Produces only what has been ordered by customers (pull production system)

Produce only what has been ordered by customers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely disagree 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XVI | P a g e
QS3. Organizations goods are stored at appropriate distribution points close to customers in
the supply chain

Goods are stored at appropriate distribution points


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 60.0
Extremely agree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

Analyse (QS1 to QS3):

From QS1, we found Agora continuously improve their quality. As maximum participants
most likely agree (80%) with the statement Continuous quality improvement program.

From QS2, we found they doesnt produces only what has been ordered by customers (pull
production system)

XVII | P a g e
From QS3, we found their organizations goods are stored at appropriate distribution points close
to customers in the supply chain. As maximum participants extremely agree (40%) with the
statement organizations goods are stored at appropriate distribution points close to customers
in the supply chain

Risk and Reward (RR)


Risk and reward are related factors in the business world. Any company that chooses to enter the
marketplace faces risks, whether financial or operational. Reward is the benefit achieved when
companies mitigate their risk and earn income from their operations.

RR1. Supply chain members help each other finance capital equipment

Supply chain members help each other finance capital equipment


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

RR2. Supply chain members share risks and rewards

Supply chain members share risk and reward


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely disagree 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XVIII | P a g e
Analyse (RR1 to RR2):

From RR1, we found Agoras Supply chain members dont help each other finance capital
equipment.

From RR2, we found that they doesnt share risk and reward with their supply chain members.

SECTION D: SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION

Supply Chain Integration (SCI)


Supply chain refers the complex network of relationships that organizations maintain with
trading partners to procure manufacture and deliver products or services

SCI1. Supply chain establish more frequent contact with each other

More frequent contact with supply chain members


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely disagree 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 40.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 80.0
Extremely agree 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XIX | P a g e
SCI2. Participates in the marketing efforts of its customers

Participate in the marketing efforts of its customers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely agree 4 80.0 80.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XX | P a g e
SCI3. Participates in the sourcing decisions of its suppliers

Participate in the sourcing decisions of its suppliers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely disagree 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely disagree 2 40.0 40.0 60.0
Most likely agree 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

Analyse (SCI1 to SCI3):

From SCI1, we found Agora establishes more frequent contact with each other in supply
chain. As maximum participants most likely agree (40%) with the statement . Supply chain
establishes more frequent contact with each other.

From SC2, we found they Participates in the marketing efforts of its customers.

From SCI3, we found their answer is neutral with the statement Participates in the sourcing
decisions of its suppliers. As 40% most likely agree and same percent most likely disagree with
the statement

SECTION D: SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE

Flexibility Performance (FP)


Flexibility is defined as the range of motion of your joints or the ability of your joints to move
freely. It also refers to the mobility of your muscles, which allows for more movement around
the joints.
XXI | P a g e
FP1. Ability to respond to and accommodate demand variations, such as seasonality

Ability to respond to demand variations


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely better 4 80.0 80.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

FP2. Ability to respond to and accommodate the periods of poor manufacturing performance
such as machine breakdown

Ability to respond to poor manufacturing performance


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely worse 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Neutral 4 80.0 80.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XXII | P a g e
FP3. Ability to respond to and accommodate the periods of poor delivery performance

Analyse (FP1 to FP3):

From FP1, we found their ability increases to respond and accommodate demand variations
because of their supply chain.

From FP2, we found their ability doesnt increase to respond to and accommodate the periods of
poor manufacturing performance such as machine breakdown

From FP3, we found their ability doesnt increase to respond and accommodate the periods of
poor delivery performance

XXIII | P a g e
Resource Performance (RP)
Resource performance refers how efficiency and effectively resource are used to deliver customer
demand.

RP1. Total cost of resources used

Total cost and resources used


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely better 5 100.0 100.0 100.0

RP2. Total cost of distribution, including transportation and handling cost

Total cost of distribution


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Neutral 2 40.0 40.0 40.0
Most likely better 3 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XXIV | P a g e
RP3. Return on investment

Return on investment
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely worse 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Neutral 3 60.0 60.0 80.0
Most likely better 1 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XXV | P a g e
Analyse (RP1 to RP3):

From RP1, we found Agora uses total cost of resources.

From RP2, we found their total cost of distribution, including transportation and handling cost is
much better because of supply chain management.

From RP3, we found their Return on investment is not much better as they expected.

Output Performance (OP)


Output performance is the amount of energy, work, goods, or services produced by a machine,
factory, company, or an individual in a period.

OP1. Sales performance

Sales performance
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Neutral 1 20.0 20.0 20.0
Most likely high 4 80.0 80.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0
XXVI | P a g e
OP2. Order fill rate

OP3. On time deliveries

On time deliveries
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely high 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Extremely high 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XXVII | P a g e
OP4. Customer response time

Customer response time


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Extremely low 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Most likely low 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

OP5. Customer complaints

Customer Complaints
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid Most likely low 3 60.0 60.0 60.0
Most likely high 2 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 5 100.0 100.0

XXVIII | P a g e
Analyse (OP1 to OP5):

From OP1, we found their supply chain management increases their sales performance. As
maximum participants reply most likely high (80%) with the statement sales performance

From OP2, we found their supply chain management increases their order fill rate. As maximum
participants reply most likely high (80%) with the statement order fill rate

From OP3, we found their supply chain management increases their performance to deliver
timely. As maximum participants reply most likely high (60%) with the statement On time
deliveries

From OP4, we found their supply chain management decreases their customer response time. As
maximum participants reply most likely low (60%) with the statement customer response time

From OP5, We found their supply chain management decreases their Customer complaints. As
maximum participants reply most likely low (60%) with the statement Customer complaints

XXIX | P a g e
CHAPTER 5: Findings & recommendation

AGORA has a valuable business prospect, but it needs to overcome many obstacles to fortify its
place in the industry. It has entered too many unrelated markets without proper expertise and
preparation, it struggles with high employee turnover, its management information system is in
shambles, it is operating at a loss due to increasingly compounding interest payments to banks
for the funds acquired during its initial expansion phase, it operates without standardized
business process, its employees often lack job descriptions, it suffers from system and real time
stock mismatch, it has started many new product categories that are lacking in product depth and
product line, and lastly it suffers from poor image in the market even though the present quality
of service offered by the company is way above industry standards. AGORA can truly
become a world class organization if it overcomes all these hurdles in the near future.

Recommendation

Instead of maintaining good relation separately with every supplier, an overall integration
will fetch a way more fruitful output.
Keeping regular touch with potential suppliers and involving their selves on new product
launching would be an effective competitive advantage.
Treating potential suppliers as partner will create a sense of ownership on everyone
which will reflect on entire affluence.
People in Bangladesh basically follow renowned actor or actresses as fashion trend. Whereas,
AGORA introduced new faces to their advertisement in billboard. Rather doing that
AGORA should introduce popular character for their billboard advertising modeling. It
will help them to grab a new customer base.
There are some disadvantages of sales promotion as it makes customers and traders more
price sensitive not only for the promoted brands but also for other brands as well in the same
product category. So discount offer should always give once a year not more than that.
Otherwise customer may used to with these offers.
Online shopping is considered to be a very helpful way of buying products through the
internet especially during the holidays. AGORA can also open online store so that people
can give order for purchase in sitting home.
XXX | P a g e
Reference

WEBSITEs:

1. BusinessDictionary.com, Available from:


http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/supply-support.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/information-system.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/service-quality.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/output.html
nd
[Accessed: 2 January 2016]
2. TechTarget, Available from: http://searchcrm.techtarget.com/definition/CRM [Accessed:
nd
2 January 2016]
3. eHow, Available from: http://www.ehow.com/facts_5397680_risk-reward-business.html
nd
[Accessed: 2 January 2016]
4. eresource, Available from: http://www.eresourceerp.com/What-does-supply-chain-
nd
integration-mean.html [Accessed: 2 January 2016]
5. Study.com, Available from: http://study.com/academy/lesson/flexibility-in-fitness-
nd
definition-stretches-exercises.html [Accessed: 2 January 2016]
6. Unknown. (2014, June 28). Company Profile. Retrieved from
RAHIMAFROOZ Limited: http://www.Rahimafrooz-bd.com/corporate.php
nd
[Accessed: 2 January 2016]

Books:

1. Chopra, S., and Meindl, P. (2007). Supply Chain Management: strategy, planning, and
operation, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, NJ.
2. Cox, A., and Townsend, M. (1998). Strategic Procurement in Construction, Thomas
Telford, London.
XXXI | P a g e
APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Table given below shows the details about the participants of the study

Name of the Participants Position & Other Information


Nurul Islam Rupok Regional Sales Manager
RAHIMAFROOZ
Logistics Limited Novo
tower, Level-8 Mobile:
01730028490
E-mail: rupok@Rahimafroozlogistics.net
Natasha Rahman Head of Sales Department
Agora,Chittagong Branch
Goalpahar, Chittagong
Mobile: 01922510159
E-mail: natasharahman07@gmail.com
Susanta Babu Sutradhar Branch Manager
Staff ID : L9735
Shwapno, Comilla Branch
Badurtala, Comilla
Mobile: 01936005168
E-mail: sbs@Agora.net

Md. Shafiqur Rahman Assistant Branch Manager


Staff ID: L9906
Agora, Comilla Branch
Badurtala, Comilla
Mobile: 01676130063
E-mail: mdshafiq@Agora.net
Md. Abdul Hannan Sales Operator
Staff ID: L9908
Agora, Comilla Branch
Badurtala, Comilla
Mobile: 01821930814
E-mail: abdulhannan413@gmail.com
XXXII | P a g e
Appendix 2: Questionnaire

Survey Questionnaire

Dear Sir/Madam,

We are the students of Comilla University of Dept. of management studies under BBA program,
are undergoing to prepare a term paper on The supply chain management of any organization.
We, therefore request you to fill up the questionnaire to enable us to complete the term paper.

Section A: General information


A1 What is your name?

----------------------------------------------
A2 Age? 22-30 1
31-44 2
Up to 44 3
A3 Gender Male 1
Female 2
A4 Name of your organization?
----------------------------------------------
A5 What is your position in the company?

Please indicate your field of responsibility? ----------------------------------------------

XXXIII | P a g e
SECTION C: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Please indicate your level of agreement on the following statements based on your experience
working in this company. The rating is from 1=Extremely Disagree to 5=Extremely Agree
Code: Supply Support practice(SSP); Customer Relationship Management(CRM); Information
System(IS); Quality Service (QS); Risk and Reward(RR)

code Extremely Extremely


Disagree 1 Agree 5

SSP1 Your organisation rely on few dependable suppliers 1 2 3 4 5


SSP2 Your organisation consider quality as number one 1 2 3 4 5
criterion in selecting suppliers
SSP3 Your organisation strive to establish long term 1 2 3 4 5
relationship with its suppliers
SSP4 Your organisation helps its suppliers to improve their 1 2 3 4 5
product quality
CRM1 Your organisation frequently interacts with customers to 1 2 3 4 5
set its reliability, responsiveness, and other standards
CRM2 Your organisation frequently measures and evaluates 1 2 3 4 5
customer satisfaction
CRM3 Your organization frequently evaluates the formal and 1 2 3 4 5
informal complaints of its customers
IS1 Your organisation shares its business units proprietary 1 2 3 4 5
information with its trading partners
IS2 Your organisation and its trading partners exchange 1 2 3 4 5
information that helps establishment of business planning
IS3 Information exchange between your organization and its 1 2 3 4 5
trading partners is adequate
QS1 Your organisation has continuous quality improvement 1 2 3 4 5
program
QS2 Your organisation produces only what has been ordered by 1 2 3 4 5
customers (pull production system)
QS3 Your organizations goods are stored at appropriate 1 2 3 4 5
distribution points close to customers in the supply chain
RR1 Your supply chain members help each other finance capital 1 2 3 4 5
equipment
RR2 Your supply chain members share risks and rewards 1 2 3 4 5

XXXIV | P a g e
SECTION D: SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION
Please indicate your level of agreement on the following statements based on your experience
working in this company. The rating is from 1=Extremely Disagree to 5=Extremely Agree
Code: Supply Chain Integration(SCI)
code Extremely Extremely
Disagree 1 Agree 5
SCI1 Your supply chain establish more frequent contact with each 1 2 3 4 5
other
SCI2 Your firm participates in the marketing efforts of its 1 2 3 4 5
customers
SCI3 Your firm participates in the sourcing decisions of its 1 2 3 4 5
suppliers

SECTION D: SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE


Please indicate your level of agreement on the following statements based on your experience
working in this company. The rating is from 1=Extremely WORSE/LOW to 5=Extremely
BETTER/HIGH
Code: Flexibility Performance(FP); Resource Performance(RP); Output Performance(OP)

code Extremely Extremely


Worse/low Better/high
1 7

FP1 Ability to respond to and accommodate demand variations, 1 2 3 4 5


such as seasonality.
FP2 Ability to respond to and accommodate the periods of poor 1 2 3 4 5
manufacturing performance such as machine breakdown
FP3 Ability to respond to and accommodate the periods of poor 1 2 3 4 5
delivery performance
RP1 Total cost of resources used 1 2 3 4 5
RP2 Total cost of distribution, including transportation and 1 2 3 4 5
handling cost
RP3 Return on investment 1 2 3 4 5
OP1 Sales 1 2 3 4 5
OP2 Order fill rate 1 2 3 4 5
OP3 On time deliveries 1 2 3 4 5
OP4 Customer response time 1 2 3 4 5
OP5 Customer complaints 1 2 3 4 5

XXXV | P a g e

You might also like