Superior Court Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING APPEAL ON MAY 25, 2017 - Filed On June 1, 2017

A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CASE
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-371-1566
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CIVIL DIVISION
In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
PETITIONERS
Case No. 1219 MDA 2016
Lower Court Case No. 16-05815
v. Lancaster City Police, et.el.,

DEFENDANTS
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ON MAY 25, 2017
On this 1st day of June, 2017, I Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant, hereby request a
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ON MAY 25, 2017
Signed by Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq., PROTHONOTARY.
Date: JUNE 1, 2017
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-371-1566
1219 MDA 2016 Motion For Reconsideration Page No. 1 of 38 Thursday June 1, 2017
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
BRIEF The following is an excerpt from the original PRELIMINARY

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF.
[Brief In Support of Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief

Summation: Due to the actions and criminal activity of the foregoing, see Part I, Parties and
Complaints, it is reasonable to prove that every aspect of the Complainants life, Stan J.
Caterbone, is subject to undo influence; harassment; torture; obstruction; etc. thus resulting in
irreparable harm and injury. This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here, and in Part
II, Finding of Facts, and all previous filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one
endgame - death or suicide. There is no life action or activity that is immune from this horrendous
HATE CRIME. The precedent and landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the
Complainant has never done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right
regarding International Signal & Control back in 1987; as well as many other proclamations and
forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported that many Targeted Individuals and Victims of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to death and/or suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large
is guilty of creating; abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and
federal law enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is landmark.
The Complainant seeks a temporary injunction until a permanent resolution to these issues can be
constructed.
Irreparable Harm: The irreparable harm and injure that has resulted from the above
circumstances includes but is not limited to the following:
1. Loss of personal property and real estate.
2. Loss of opportunity to secure personal property, business assets, and court related assets,
information, and evidence; including when sleeping (rape drug rohypnol).
3. Loss of protection from law enforcement at every level; local, state, and federal.
4. Loss of relationships including family; friends; and professional.
5. Loss of time and loss of life as a normal person would know it.
6. Loss of freedom of movement in Downtown Lancaster Entertainment Venues and Constant
and Never Ending Threats of Physical Harm, Harassment, Over-Charging on Cost of Goods,
intimidation, discrimination, and barring from entering public places and entertainment
venues, violations of intellectual property rights, and obstruction of justice.
7. Loss of freedom of movement; complainant has been denied every opportunity to secure
his personal and business assets at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania making
it impossible to travel or leave for any amount of time without fear of harm.
8. Loss of freedom of movement may constitute false imprisonment and may invoke the
federal habeas corpus laws of freedom.
9. Loss of female companionship, and under constant mocking for it.
10.Loss of business opportunities.
11.Loss of accounts receivables.
12.Loss of professional and personal reputation; especially with specific regards to honesty
and integrity.
13. Civil and Criminal Conspiracy to manufacture mental illness symptoms and illnesses.
Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief:

There are six essential prerequisites that a party must establish prior to obtaining a Preliminary
Emergency Injunction For Relief:
1) that the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be
adequately compensated by damages;
2) that greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than from granting it, and,
concomitantly, that issuance of an injunction will not substantially harm other interested parties in
the proceedings;
3) that a preliminary injunction will properly restore the parties to their status as it existed
immediately prior to the alleged wrongful conduct;
4) that the activity it seeks to restrain is actionable, that its right to relief is clear, and that the
wrong is manifest, or, in other words, that it is likely to prevail on the merits;
5) that the injunction it seeks is reasonably suited to abate the offending activity; and,
6) that a preliminary injunction will not adversely affect the public interest
Relief Sought By Plaintiff: The Complainant seeks immediate relief from the above in the form
of sanctions and fines for those guilty of extortion and embezzlement and those withholding
accounts receivables. Complainant seeks immediate relief from the law enforcement agencies
that continue abuse of process. Complainant seeks immediate relief from public officials for
obstructing justice and due process. Complainant seeks relief, in as much as the courts are able,
with regards to the harassment and torture from those known of such crimes. The Complainant
seeks relief from stalking and harassing neighbors and requires law enforcement to make sure
households can identify all occupants and prove they are entitled to the lease and or deed. The
Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant his PRO SE BILLINGS INVOICE.
The Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant SUMMARY JUDGMENT in all
cases filed before the LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS in retaliation for
the ARROGANCE OF BOTH THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY AND THE
JUDICIAL SYSTEM FOR THE SYSTEMIC ABUSE OF PROCESS AND THE EXTREME NATURE
OF THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WHICH IN ITSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PUTTING
THE COMPLAINANT'S LIFE IN HARMS WAY ON A DAILY BASIS.
Date June 27, 2016]
ARGUMENT
May I suggest that you review the USCA THIRD CIRCUIT CASE 17-1904 IN IT'S
ENTIRETY. I FILED THE SAME PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION IN THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA A FEW
BLOCKS FROM YOU IN CASE NO. 16-2513. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
YVETTE KANE TRANSFERED THAT INJUNCTION TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT IN CASE NO.
17-0867 AND I HAVE APPEALED IT TO THE USCA THIRD CIRCUIT CASE NO. 17-1904.
I WOULD HOPE THAT THE ORDER OF MAY 25, 2017 DENYING MY APPEAL IS NOT
IN ADDITION TO BEING COLLUSION TO COMMIT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND DUE
PROCESS:
1. RETALIATION FOR MY AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF FORMER PENNSYLVANIA

ATTORNEY GENERAL KATHLEEN KANE, WHICH I AM LISTED AS HER AMICUS IN
THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT IN CASE NO.
3575 EDA 2016; WHERE BRIEFS ARE DUE JUNE 16, 2017
2. RETALIATION FOR MY TAKING THE LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT CASE TO THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 16-6822 LAST YEAR.
SEE ATTACHED.
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-371-1566
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASES

14.J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
15.U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
16.U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 17-1904 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., The appeal of the
Preliminary Injunction For Emergency Relief Case No. 17-0868; Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
17.U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-01233 Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No.
17-0867 Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-
02982;
18.U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION
FOR HABEUS CORPUS
19.Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
20.Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
21.Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
22.Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re
Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
23.U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ON MAY 25, 2017 has been served on this 1st day of JUNE, 2017,
2016 in paper format to the following:
MR. BARRY HANDWERGER

ZIMMERMAN, PFANNEBECKER, NUFFORT & ALBERT, LLP
22 South Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717)299-0711
ned@zpnalaw.com
Date: JUNE 1, 2017
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-371-1566
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
LANDMARK ABUSE OF PROCESS AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CASE by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 371-1566
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE : Case No. 17-1904

APPELLANT : Lower Court Case No. 17-cv-867
: Middle District Case No. 16-2513
:
ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
I Stanley J. Caterbone, APPEALANT , and appearing Pro Se, do hereby on this 27 th

day of May 2017 do hereby file this ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL according to the
ORDER dated May 22, 2017. The Appeal was taken to the ORDER dated April 12, 2017
by the Honorable Edward G. Smith. This ARGUMENT must not exceed 5 pages as per the
ORDER of May 22, 2017. I, Stanley J. Caterbone hereby file a Motion to Leave to File In
Excess of 5 Pages.
Dated May 30, 2017
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-371-1566
17-1904 ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL Page No. 1 of 24 Tuesday May 30, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 17-1904 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., The appeal of the
Preliminary Injunction For Emergency Relief Case No. 17-0868; Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-01233 Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No.
17-0867 Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-
02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 APPEALLANT for
Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 APPEALLANT for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, APPEALLANT for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No.
1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re
Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page No. 9
2 of 38
33
24 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL

The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program
Of The Lancaster City Police Department
On August 22, 2016 Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq., wrote As was stated above,
organized stalking methods were used extensively by communist East Germanys Stasi (state
police) as a means of maintaining political control over its citizens. Although this is supposedly
illegal in the US, the same covert tactics are quietly used by Americas local and federal law
enforcement, and intelligence agencies, to supprss political and domestic dissent, silence whistle
blowers, and get revenge against persons who have angered someone with connections to the
public and private agencies involved. Such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases,
orchestrated) by federal agencies; however such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for
personal and corporate vendettas by current and former corrupt employees of law
enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and their clients. Common
implementations of community policing include: (1) relying on community based crime prevention
by utilizing civilian education, neighborhood watch, and a variety of other techniques, as
opposed to relying solely on police patrols; (2) restructuring the patrol from an emergency
response based system to emphasizing proactive techniques such as foot patrol; (3) increased
officer accountability to civilians they are supposed to serve; and (4) decentralizing police
authority, allowing more discretion amongst lower ranking officers, and more initiative
expected from them.
I am a Federal Whistleblower and in 1987 I met with Executives of an International Arms

dealer named International Signal and Control, PLC., or ISC, headquartered in my hometown of
Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I at the time was a shareholder and I was solicited to finance some
problematic operations through the financial firm that I had founded, Financial Management
Group, Ltd., In 1991 they were indicted for the third largest fraud in the United States, a $Billion
Dollar Fraud, when they merged with Great Britain's largest Defense Contractor, Ferranti
International, Plc., in 1987. In 1987 I was arrested for literally stealing my own files from my own
office and faced 4 felonies and 3 misdemeanors with prison terms in the tens of years. After the
merger was completed in December of 1987, all of my charges were dismissed by the Lancaster
County District Attorney's Office in March of 1988. ISC Board Member, Bobby Ray Inman, who
was former Secretary of the Navy and former Director of the National Security Agency, or NSA
was nominated to be Secretary of Defense for Bill Clinton. He later had to withdraw his name after
allegations of ISC began to surface. In 1991 Ted Koppel and the Financial Times of London
broadcast 3 different segments disclosing that ISC was essentially a black ops program of the NSA
and CIA and tried desperately to derail the nomination for Director of the CIA, Robert Gates, who
they allege was involved in the early stages of the program. He was named Director of the CIA
and later served as Secretary of Defense for George W. Bush and now President Barrack Obama.
ISC responsible for developing the Cluster Bomb, and Saddam Hussein was a loyal customer.
In the late 1980's and early 1990 I was a contractor for several government agencies,
including DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency of the Department of Defense.
My company Advanced Media Group had conducted business all over the world, including some 15
or more foreign countries. DARPA IS WIDELY KNOWN AS A DEVELOPER OF MIND CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES AND HOLDS PATENTS. DARPA is also credited for developing the internet. I was
an expert in optical publishing and my company was one of only 4 or 5 that had the capability to
manufacture CD-ROM's in the domestic United States.
Now, I am a prisoner of the state and have been since 1987, and that the
activities surrounding the my life has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. I
have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct
energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S.
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.10
3 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic
telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and
weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of
the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et.
al., or 05-cv-2288/U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT Case No. 07-4474-4475.
On March 8, 2016 I was detained by some (8) NSA Security Police, handcuffed, and
interrogated for about 2 hours at NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. In 2005 I was
detained by (2) DIA, or Defense Intelligence Agency of the Department of Defense, in Austin
Texas and interrogated for almost 2 hours. Both incidents I was sent on my way without any
explanation as to WHY?
Unfortunately while I have made many in person complaints to just about every
law enforcement agency, including several meetings with FBI in Philadelphia and
Harrisburg, the pleas for help and assistance have yielded nothing but more attacks to
my person, property, electronics, home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and
lastly his mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. I
have already made claims of COINTELPRO-like tactics in my filings in the U.S.C.A. Case
No. 16-4014; 16-2513 US District Court MIDDLE District, and this case 17-0867, against
these same said actors and perpetrators.
In 2016 I am AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the

Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v. Kane which included perjury charges during the alleged leaking of grand jury information.
Kathleen Kane took on the Good Old Boy network regarding judicial reform in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the long standing public corruption
ring that was evident from local law enforcement to Supreme Court Justices, and everyone in
between. Briefs are due on June 16, 2017.
In 2015 I filed an AMICUS BRIEF on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert in Case No. 14-
02559 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I took the case to the U.S.
Supreme Court in Case No. 16-6822. Lisa Michelle Lambert was convicted in 1992 of the murder
of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on
Amazon.com. I is in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS

HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster,
Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work
of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being
harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep
individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency
devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons. I again reintroduced
the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania Capitol
trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still does to this day.
In 2006 I began my role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as
"FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full
service financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic
vision for his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.11
4 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. I has been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial
Board of Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource
Bank acquisition and the subprime failures.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant I filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current
litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United
States Third District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights,
anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to
this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common
Pleas of Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to
withhold the Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center
& Marriot. We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel
Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County
Convention Center is finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after
submission of an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey,
Chief Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for

wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for
several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a
Day Trading project that lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher

Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan
was developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the
Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the
former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to

counter the effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the
U.S. Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K
Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit
organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We
had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The
24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable
organizations and faith based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to
schools, non profit organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational
support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.12
5 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was
controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to
computerized their accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided
consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of
Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the
Informations Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26
Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay
Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I
was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout
the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with revenues in
excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for
saving the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts,
the company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We
were responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and
procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance
measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company
was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public
contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in
order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the
entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its
previous years, and record revenues.
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador
Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was
founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together
and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-
face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under
President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to
administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to
discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments
technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the
article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine
DISC, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers
deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all
types of applications involving telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S.
domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with
commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I
performed services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of
Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM,
Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I
also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive
mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier
provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering
maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell
American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and
the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and
perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.13
6 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as
executive producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be
delivered in a digital format; the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the
technology, and created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which
would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording
industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station
Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown
when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the
country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients
included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones,
Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was
the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace
technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with
us in delivering the Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was
to include the commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the
recording industry simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie.
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo
for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the
Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a
portable medium, a compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was
funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from
$3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received
solicitations from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that
wanted to raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could
raise equity funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage
Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of
their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured
refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing
the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions
with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a
number of other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen
Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt.
30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than
local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services
organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a
stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new
firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability
insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate
headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in
Pennsylvania, and
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.14
7 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and
our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at
about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for
the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were
dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed
a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all
of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was
signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver
while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2
years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified
Agent for the National Football League Players Association.
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the
International Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing
membership 3to 4 times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally
syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major
fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden
Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the
professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a
wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists,
estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial
planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National
Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of
Citi Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help
advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the
investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American
Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the
company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the
investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most
investment advisers.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no
medical reports or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there
was never a psychiatric evaluation for the same said purposes. I am receiving a net
monthly benefit of $1379.00 and have been since April of 2008 and was declared
disabled in December of 2005, the same said month that I reported that I became the
victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other related symptoms and illnesses.
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.15
8 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
Dated May 30, 2017
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-371-1566
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUMENT
2016 Motion
IN For
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF APPEAL Page
PageNo.
No.16
9 of
of24
33
38 Thursday
Tuesday May
June30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 17
19 of 38
10 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 18
20 of 38
11 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 19
21 of 38
12 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 20
22 of 38
13 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 21
23 of 38
14 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 22
24 of 38
15 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 23
25 of 38
16 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 24
26 of 38
17 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-0867
17-1904
1219 MDAMOTION FORINRECONSIDERATION
ARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 MotionIN
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL PageNo.
APPEALPage
Page 64 25
66
65 of 106
27
18 102
107
of 38
33
24 Monday
FridayApril
Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday April27,
May
June 10,
7, 2017
30,
1,
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-0867
17-1904
ARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 MotionIN
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL PageNo.
APPEALPage
Page 65 26
67
66 of 106
28
19 102
107
of 38
33
24 Monday
FridayApril
Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday April27,
May
June 10,
7, 2017
30,
1,
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-0867
17-1904
ARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 MotionIN
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL PageNo.
APPEALPage
Page 66 27
68
67 of 106
29
20 102
107
of 38
33
24 Monday
FridayApril
Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday April27,
May
June 10,
7, 2017
30,
1,
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 28
30 of 38
21 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 29
31 of 38
22 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 30
32 of 38
23 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
A LANDMARK ABUSE
A LANDMARK
OF PROCESS
HUMAN
ANDRIGHTS
OBSTRUCTION
TORTURE
OFCASE
JUSTICE
AND CASE
OBSTRUCTION
by Stan J.OF
Caterbone,
JUSTICEPro
CASE
Se
17-1904
1219 MDAARGUEMENT
ARGUMENT
2016 Motion
ININ
For
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Reconsideration
OF
OFAPPEAL
APPEALPage
Page No. 31
33 of 38
24 33
24 Thursday
Saturday
Tuesday May
June27,
30,
1, 2017
DOCUMENT DIVIDER

Superior Court Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING APPEAL ON MAY 25, 2017 - Filed On June 1, 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Superior Court Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING APPEAL ON MAY 25, 2017 - Filed On June 1, 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS TORTURE CASE AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CASE

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

v. Lancaster City Police, et.el.,

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Date: JUNE 1, 2017

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

BRIEF The following is an excerpt from the original PRELIMINARY

[Brief In Support of Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief

Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Relief:

Date June 27, 2016]

1. RETALIATION FOR MY AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF FORMER PENNSYLVANIA

ACTIVE COURT CASES

MR. BARRY HANDWERGER

Date: JUNE 1, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE : Case No. 17-1904

ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL

I Stanley J. Caterbone, APPEALANT , and appearing Pro Se, do hereby on this 27 th

Dated May 30, 2017

ACTIVE COURT CASES

ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL

I am a Federal Whistleblower and in 1987 I met with Executives of an International Arms

In 2016 I am AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the

In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS

In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for

In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher

In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to

Dated May 30, 2017

You might also like