Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sergio Diaz
Ph.D. Student
Mayo 2, 2017
Outline
1 Introduction
2 Problem
3 Previous Work
4 Proposed Algorithm
5 ICI Algorithm
6 Results
Introduction to WSN
Problem Statement
Previous Work
Problem: Interference generated by other devices.
1 CSMA/CA
Nodes determine if the channel is clear before they transmit a packet.
If the channel is busy, the nodes wait for a backoff period.
If the channel is still busy after 4 re-attempts, then the packet is dropped.
2 Link Quality Characterization
Objective: To characterize the behavior of the wireless link by measuring different
parameters.
3 Interference Identification
Objective:
To determine whether there is interference or not.
To identify the source of interference: microwave oven, Wi-fi device or
Bluetooth appliance.
Proposed Algorithm
Algorithm: ICI - Interference Characterization and Identification
for WSN
Interference Characterization:
To characterize the behavior of the wireless link
We used 2 metrics: Latency and Packet Loss
Interference Identification:
To identify the percentage of interference in a wireless link
To locate the source of interference
Close to the transmitter or the receiver?
Network Setup
We tested 2 different scenarios
Interference close to receiver
Interference close to
transmitter
The source of interference
generates a squared modulated
signal with different duty cycles.
Interference Characterization
Behavior of Packet Loss
Int. close to RX:
Packet loss increases
almost linearly with the
percentage of interference.
Because the TX sends the
packets even in the
presence of interference.
Int. close to TX:
Flat behavior
Packets do not collide with
the interference signal
since the TX implements
CSMA/CA
Interference Characterization
Using Latency and Packet Loss,
we characterize the wireless link
using the LP metric (Eq1).
It is the linear normalized
combination of Latency and
Percentage of packet.
Interference Characterization
We analyze the LP metric by
means of the empirical
cumulative distribution function
ecdf: It is the fraction of
samples smaller than or equal to
x.
Interference Identification
To identify the percentage of
interference in a wireless link
We used 2 statistical distances
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
distance (KS distance)
It is the maximum value of
the absolute difference
between two ecdf.
Cram
er-von Mises distance
(CM distance)
It is proportional to the
area between two ecdf
curves
Interference Identification
Summarizing...
1 We have found the
characterizacion curves.
2 We can determine the
statistical distance from a
characterization curve to
another.
3 Then, if 2 characterization
curves are close to each other
(KS-CM distance), that
means that they have the
same percentage of
interference.
Interference Identification
Location of the source of
interference.
We define the coefficient
It expresses the ratio of packet
loss to latency
If >= 1 it means that the set
of samples have high packet loss
and low latency, thus, the int. is
close to the RX.
If < 1 it means that the set of
samples have high latency and
low packet loss, thus, the int. is
close to the TX.