Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Greg Fasshauer
Fall 2010
Outline
Definition
A function : [0, ) R that is in C[0, ) C (0, ) and satisfies
Example
The following are completely monotone on [0, ):
(r ) = , 0,
Example
The following are completely monotone on [0, ):
(r ) = , 0,
(r ) = er , 0,
Example
The following are completely monotone on [0, ):
(r ) = , 0,
(r ) = er , 0, since for ` = 0, 1, 2, . . .
(1)` (`) (r ) = ` er 0,
Example
The following are completely monotone on [0, ):
(r ) = , 0,
(r ) = er , 0, since for ` = 0, 1, 2, . . .
(1)` (`) (r ) = ` er 0,
1
(r ) = , 0,
(1 + r )
Example
The following are completely monotone on [0, ):
(r ) = , 0,
(r ) = er , 0, since for ` = 0, 1, 2, . . .
(1)` (`) (r ) = ` er 0,
1
(r ) = , 0, since for ` = 0, 1, 2, . . .
(1 + r )
Remark
1
(r ) = er and (r ) = , 0 are reminiscent of Gaussians
(1 + r )
and inverse multiquadrics (subject to transformation r 7 r 2 ).
Remark
1
(r ) = er and (r ) = , 0 are reminiscent of Gaussians
(1 + r )
and inverse multiquadrics (subject to transformation r 7 r 2 ).
Question
Is there a connection between completely monotone functions and
strictly positive definite radial functions?
Remark
1
(r ) = er and (r ) = , 0 are reminiscent of Gaussians
(1 + r )
and inverse multiquadrics (subject to transformation r 7 r 2 ).
Question
Is there a connection between completely monotone functions and
strictly positive definite radial functions?
Possible Answer
Find an integral characterization of completely monotone functions.
Theorem (Hausdorff-Bernstein-Widder)
Theorem (Hausdorff-Bernstein-Widder)
Remark
The HBW-Theorem shows that the functions (r ) = er can be
viewed as the fundamental completely monotone functions.
Proof.
Widders proof of this theorem can be found in [Widder (1941),
p. 160], where he reduces the proof of this theorem to another
theorem by Hausdorff on completely monotone sequences.
A detailed proof can also be found in the books
[Cheney and Light (1999), Wendland (2005a)].
Remark
Note that the function is now defined via the square of the norm.
This differs from our earlier definition of radial functions.
Proof
Proof
Since we saw earlier that the Gaussians are strictly positive definite
and radial on any Rs it follows that the quadratic form is non-negative,
and therefore is positive definite on any Rs .
Since we saw earlier that the Gaussians are strictly positive definite
and radial on any Rs it follows that the quadratic form is non-negative,
and therefore is positive definite on any Rs .
Remark
One could also have used a change of variables to combine
Schoenbergs characterization of functions that are positive definite
and radial on any Rs with the HBW characterization of completely
monotone functions.
We can see from the previous proof that if the measure is not
concentrated at the origin, then is even strictly positive definite and
radial on any Rs .
We can see from the previous proof that if the measure is not
concentrated at the origin, then is even strictly positive definite and
radial on any Rs .
We can see from the previous proof that if the measure is not
concentrated at the origin, then is even strictly positive definite and
radial on any Rs .
Remark
Schoenberg only showed completely monotone and not constant =
strictly positive definite and radial. A proof that the converse also
holds can be found in [Wendland (2005a)].
Example
1 Gaussians
(r ) = er , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
Example
1 Gaussians
(r ) = er , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
The Schoenberg interpolation theorem tells us that Gaussians
2 2
(x) = (kxk2 ) = e kxk are strictly positive definite and radial on
Rs for all s.
Example
1 Gaussians
(r ) = er , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
The Schoenberg interpolation theorem tells us that Gaussians
2 2
(x) = (kxk2 ) = e kxk are strictly positive definite and radial on
Rs for all s.
2 Inverse multiquadrics
(r ) = 1/(1 + r ) , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
Example
1 Gaussians
(r ) = er , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
The Schoenberg interpolation theorem tells us that Gaussians
2 2
(x) = (kxk2 ) = e kxk are strictly positive definite and radial on
Rs for all s.
2 Inverse multiquadrics
(r ) = 1/(1 + r ) , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
The Schoenberg interpolation theorem tells us that inverse
multiquadrics (x) = (kxk2 ) = 1/(1 + kxk2 ) are strictly positive
definite and radial on Rs for all s.
Example
1 Gaussians
(r ) = er , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
The Schoenberg interpolation theorem tells us that Gaussians
2 2
(x) = (kxk2 ) = e kxk are strictly positive definite and radial on
Rs for all s.
2 Inverse multiquadrics
(r ) = 1/(1 + r ) , > 0, is completely monotone on [0, ) and not
constant.
The Schoenberg interpolation theorem tells us that inverse
multiquadrics (x) = (kxk2 ) = 1/(1 + kxk2 ) are strictly positive
definite and radial on Rs for all s.
Remark
Not only is the test for complete monotonicity simpler than the Fourier
transform, but we also are able to verify strict positive definiteness of
the inverse multiquadrics without any dependence of s on .
fasshauer@iit.edu MATH 590 Chapter 5 17
Completely Monotone Functions
Remark
For radial (or isotropic) strictly positive definite functions
complete monotonicity is a simple test.
Remark
For radial (or isotropic) strictly positive definite functions
complete monotonicity is a simple test.
As long as we have translation invariant (or stationary) strictly
positive definite functions we can use Fourier transforms.
Remark
For radial (or isotropic) strictly positive definite functions
complete monotonicity is a simple test.
As long as we have translation invariant (or stationary) strictly
positive definite functions we can use Fourier transforms.
If we dont have either property, then we need to use the definition
of general positive definite kernels:
Definition
A complex-valued continuous function K : Rs Rs C is called
positive definite on Rs if
N X
X N
cj ck K (x j , x k ) 0 (1)
j=1 k =1
Outline
Remark
(r1 )+(r2 )
Since convexity of means that ( r1 +r 2 )
2
2 , or simply
00 (r ) 0 if 00 exists, a multiply monotone function is in essence just a
completely monotone function whose monotonicity is truncated.
Example
The truncated power function
` (r ) = (1 r )`+
Example
The truncated power function
` (r ) = (1 r )`+
Remark
We mentioned in Chapter 4 that the truncated power functions lead to
radial functions that are strictly positive definite on Rs provided
` bs/2c + 1.
We now want to come up with a multiple monotonicity criterion that will
let us come to this conclusion much easier.
Example
If we define the integral operator I by
Z
(If )(r ) = f (t)dt, r 0, (2)
r
Example
If we define the integral operator I by
Z
(If )(r ) = f (t)dt, r 0, (2)
r
Example
If we define the integral operator I by
Z
(If )(r ) = f (t)dt, r 0, (2)
r
Remark
The operator I plays an important role in the construction of compactly
supported radial basis functions.
Proof.
To see that a function of the form
Z
(r ) = (1 rt)k+1 d(t),
0
Proof.
To see that a function of the form
Z
(r ) = (1 rt)k+1 d(t),
0
Remark
For k the Williamson characterization corresponds to the HBW
characterization of completely monotone functions (and is equivalent
provided we extend Williamsons work to include continuity at the
origin).
Theorem (Micchelli)
Remark
1 This theorem allows us to verify the strict positive definiteness of
truncated power functions without the use of Fourier transforms.
Remark
1 This theorem allows us to verify the strict positive definiteness of
truncated power functions without the use of Fourier transforms.
2 As for the Bochner functions B (x) = eixy , Gaussians and the
Poisson radial functions earlier, use of a point evaluation measure
with mass concentrated at t = > 0, shows that we can view the
truncated power functions with different support sizes
(r ) = (1 r )k+1 as the fundamental compactly supported
positive definite radial functions since any such function is given
by an infinite linear combination from { } .
Mismatch I
Mismatch I
Mismatch I
Mismatch I
(r ) = (1 r )`+ .
(r ) = (1 r )`+ .
(r ) = (1 r 2 )`+
is not strictly positive definite and radial on Rs for any s since it is not
even strictly positive definite and radial on R (and therefore even much
less so on any higher-dimensional space).
1
2
= (1 t 2 )` cos(rt)dt
0
1
2
= (1 t 2 )` cos(rt)dt
0
J`+ 1 (r )
= 2` (` + 1) 2
.
`+ 21
r
Here we used
p the compact support of and the fact that
J 1 (r ) = 2/r cos r .
2
1
2
= (1 t 2 )` cos(rt)dt
0
J`+ 1 (r )
= 2` (` + 1) 2
.
`+ 21
r
Here we used
p the compact support of and the fact that
J 1 (r ) = 2/r cos r .
2
The function F1 is oscillatory, and therefore cannot be strictly
positive definite by one of our earlier theorems.
Mismatch II
Mismatch II
Mismatch II
This is clear since we have already seen a number of functions that are
strictly positive definite and radial, but not monotone at all namely
the oscillatory Laguerre-Gaussians and the Poisson radial functions.
Additional insights
It is interesting to combine the Schoenberg Theorem and Williamsons characterization .
Additional insights
It is interesting to combine the Schoenberg Theorem and Williamsons characterization .
If one starts with the strictly positive definite radial Gaussian
2r 2
(r ) = e ,
is completely monotone.
Additional insights
It is interesting to combine the Schoenberg Theorem and Williamsons characterization .
If one starts with the strictly positive definite radial Gaussian
2r 2
(r ) = e ,
is completely monotone.
Now, any function that is completely monotone is also multiply
monotone of any order, so that we can use Williamsons
characterization to conclude that the function
2r
(r ) = e
Remark
We are a long way from having a complete characterization of
(radial) functions for which the scattered data interpolation
problem has a unique solution.
Remark
We are a long way from having a complete characterization of
(radial) functions for which the scattered data interpolation
problem has a unique solution.
As we will see later, such an (as of now unknown) characterization
will involve also functions which are not strictly positive definite.
Remark
We are a long way from having a complete characterization of
(radial) functions for which the scattered data interpolation
problem has a unique solution.
As we will see later, such an (as of now unknown) characterization
will involve also functions which are not strictly positive definite.
For example, we will mention a result of Micchellis according to
which conditionally positive definite functions of order one can be
used for the scattered data interpolation problem.
Remark
We are a long way from having a complete characterization of
(radial) functions for which the scattered data interpolation
problem has a unique solution.
As we will see later, such an (as of now unknown) characterization
will involve also functions which are not strictly positive definite.
For example, we will mention a result of Micchellis according to
which conditionally positive definite functions of order one can be
used for the scattered data interpolation problem.
Furthermore, all of the results dealt with so far involve radial basis
functions that are centered at the given data sites. There are only
limited results addressing the situation in which the centers for the
basis functions and the data sites may differ.
References I
Buhmann, M. D. (2003).
Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations.
Cambridge University Press.
Cheney, E. W. and Light, W. A. (1999).
A Course in Approximation Theory.
Brooks/Cole (Pacific Grove, CA).
Fasshauer, G. E. (2007).
Meshfree Approximation Methods with M ATLAB.
World Scientific Publishers.
Feller, W. (1966).
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Application, Vol. 2.
Wiley & Sons, New York.
Iske, A. (2004).
Multiresolution Methods in Scattered Data Modelling.
Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 37, Springer Verlag
(Berlin).
References II
Wendland, H. (2005a).
Scattered Data Approximation.
Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
Widder, D. V. (1941).
The Laplace Transform.
Princeton University Press (Princeton).
Askey, R. (1973).
Radial characteristic functions.
TSR #1262, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Buhmann, M. D. (1993a).
New developments in the theory of radial basis function interpolation.
in Multivariate Approximation: From CAGD to Wavelets, Kurt Jetter and Florencio
Utreras (eds.), World Scientific Publishing (Singapore), pp. 3575.
References III
Micchelli, C. A. (1986).
Interpolation of scattered data: distance matrices and conditionally positive
definite functions.
Constr. Approx. 2, pp. 1122.
Schoenberg, I. J. (1938a).
Metric spaces and completely monotone functions.
Ann. of Math. 39, pp. 811841.
Williamson, R. E. (1956).
Multiply monotone functions and their Laplace transform.
Duke Math. J. 23, pp. 189207.