Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q: What are the different schools of thought or theories in Criminal Law and describe each briefly. To what
theory does our Revised Penal Code belong?
A: Two schools of thought in Criminal Law
(a) CLASSICAL THEORY - which simply means that the basis of criminal liabilities is human free will, and
the purpose of the penalty is retribution which must be proportional to the gravity of the offense;
(b) POSITIVIST THEORY - which considers man as a social being and his acts are attributable not just to
his will but to other forces of society. As such, punishment is not the solution, as he is not entirely to be
blamed; law and jurisprudence should not be the yardstick in the imposition of sanction, instead the
underlying reasons would be inquired into.
We follow the classical school of thought although some provisions of eminently positivist in tendencies, like
punishment of impossible crime, Juvenile circumstances, are incorporated in our Code.
Q: What are the Constitutional Limitations on the Power of Congress to enact penal laws?
A:
1. Equal protection
2. Due Process
3. Non-imposition of cruel and unusual punishment or excessive fines
4. Bill of attainder
5. Ex post facto law
Q: A special law punishes a certain act as a crime, but it is silent as to the civil liability of one who violates
the same. May the court pronounce that a person is civilly liable to the offended party, considering that the
special law is silent on this point?
A: Yes. Article 100 states that every person criminally liable for a felony is also civilly liable. That article shall be
applied suppletorily to avoid an injustice that would be caused to the private offended party, if he would not be
indemnified for the damages or injuries sustained by him.
Q: Is mere knowledge, acquiescence to, or approval of the act, without cooperation at least, agreement to
cooperate enough to constitute a conspiracy?
A: No, there must be an intentional participation in the crime with a view to further the common felonious objective
(Taer v. CA, 1990).
Q: Is conspiracy possible even when participants are not known to each other?
A: When several persons who do not know each other simultaneously attack the victim, the act of one is the act of all,
regardless of the degree of injury inflicted by any one of them. All will be liable for the consequences. Do not
think that participants are always known to each other.
Q: Multiple Offenders
A:
Habitual Delinquency Recidivism Habituality/ Reiteracion/
Art. 62 (5) Art. 14 (9) Repetition
Art. 14 (10)
Crimes Specified: Sufficient that the offender have Necessary that the offender
committed (a) less serious or serious been previously convicted by shall have served out his
physical injuries final judgment for another crime sentence for the first offense
(b) robbery embraced in the same title of the
(c) theft Code on the date of his trial
(d) estafa
(e) falsification
Period of time Within 10 years from his last No period of time
the crimes are release or conviction
committed
CRIMINAL LAW - 5 - UP COLLEGE OF LAW PRE-WEEK NOTES
Number of Guilty the third time or oftener The second conviction for an The previous and subsequent
crimes offense embraced in the same offenses must NOT be
committed title of this Code embraced in the same title of
the Code
Their effects An additional penalty shall be If not offset by any mitigating Not always an aggravating
imposed circumstance, increase the circumstance
penalty only to the maximum
Q: What is meant by plurality of crimes?
A: It is the successive execution, by the same individual, of different criminal acts upon any of which no
conviction has yet been declared.
Q: What are the two kinds of complex crimes and what are their requisites?
A:
a) Compound Crime - A single act results in two or more grave or less grave felonies
REQUISITES:
(1) That only a single act is performed by the offender
(2) That the single acts produces
(i) 2 or more grave felonies, or
(ii) 1 or more grave and 1 or more less grave felonies, or
(iii) 2 or more less grave felonies
b) Complex Crime Proper - An offense is a necessary means for committing the other; BASIS is the
singleness of the impulse; necessary indispensable
REQUISITES:
(1) That at least two offenses are committed
(2) That one or some of the offenses must be necessary to commit the other
(3) That both or all the offenses must be punished under the same statute.
Q: What are the five circumstances affecting criminal liability and how do they affect it?
A:
Q: What are the six types of justifying circumstances and what are the elements of each?
A:
NB: If first condition is present, but the second is NOT because the offender acted with culpa,
the offender will be entitled to a privileged mitigating circumstance.
the penalty would be reduced by one or two degrees.
Q: What are the mitigating circumstances and the corresponding requisites for each?
A:
A. Incomplete justification or exemption (Par 1, Art. 13)
Confession
1) offender spontaneously confessed his guilt
2) confession was made in open, competent court
3) confession of guilt was made prior to the presentation of prosecutions evidence
Q: What is the most indispensable requisite in case of incomplete self-defense, defense of relatives, defense
of stranger?
A: UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION must always be present.
Q: How is gravity of offense determined for the mitigating circumstance of vindication to apply?
A: The question whether or not a certain personal offense is grave must be decided by the court, having in mind:
the social standing of the person,
the place and
the time when the insult was made.
Q: May vindication of a grave offense and passion or obfuscation be counted separately and independently?
A: No.
CRIMINAL LAW - 9 - UP COLLEGE OF LAW PRE-WEEK NOTES
Q: Is it important that a warrant of arrest has not yet been issued for the mitigating circumstance of voluntary
surrender to apply?
A: No, whether or not a warrant of arrest had been issued immaterial and irrelevant.
Time
Nocturnity (Par. 6, Art. 14)
1) facilitated the commission of the crime
2) especially sought by offender to ensure commission
3) taken advantage for impunity
4) accomplished between sundown and sunrise
Motivation
Price, reward or promise (Par. 11, Art. 14)
1) at least two principals direct and inducement
2) price, reward or promise made before and in consideration of crime
Personal circumstances of offender
Recidivism (Par. 9, Art. 14)
1) offender is on trial for an offense
2) previously convicted by final judgment of another crime
3) both the first and the second offenses are in same title of RPC
4) offender is convicted of the new offense
Means
Advantage of public positions (Par. 1, Art. 14)
1) offender is a public officer
2) commission of crime not possible without powers, resources, influence of position
6 months & 1
Prohibition to enter w/in 25-250 km radius
Destierro day
from the designated place
to 6 years
1 month & 1 Suspension of right to hold
Arresto mayor day office and
to 6 months right of suffrage
Q: What happens if the culprit is captured but he evades again the service of his sentence?
A: The period of prescription that ran during the evasion is not forfeited. The period of prescription that has run in his
favor should be taken into account.
Q: What happens in cases where our government has extradition treaty with another country but the crime is
not included in the treaty?
A: It would interrupt the running of the prescriptive period.
Q: What are the two ways of committing espionage under the RPC?
A:
1. By entering, without authority therefor, a warship, fort, or naval or military establishment or reservation to
obtain any information, plans, photographs or other data of a confidential nature relative to the defense of
the Philippines
2. By disclosing to the representative of a foreign nation the contents of the articles, data or information
referred to in paragraph 1, which he had in his possession by reason of the public office he holds
Q: In delay in the delivery of detained persons to the proper judicial authorities, is warrant of arrest
necessary?
A: No, in fact, the crime is only committed when the arrest is without a warrant. At the beginning, the detention is
legal since it is in the pursuance of a lawful arrest. Detention becomes arbitrary when the:
applicable period lapses
without the arresting officer filing a formal charge with the proper court.
Criminal Violate the offended partys Deprive the offended party of Accuse the offended party of a crime
intent constitutional freedom against his personal liberty he did not commit, deliver him to the
warrantless arrest proper authority, and file the
necessary charges to incriminate
him
CRIMINAL LAW - 16 - UP COLLEGE OF LAW PRE-WEEK NOTES
Q: What are the three acts punishable in violation of domicile? What are their common elements?
A:
Acts punishable:
1. By entering any dwelling against the will of the owner thereof
2. By searching papers or other effects found therein without the previous consent of such owner
3. By refusing to leave the premises, after having surreptitiously entered said dwelling and after having been
asked to leave the same
Elements common to three acts:
1. That the offender is a public officer or employee
2. That he is not authorized by judicial order to enter the dwelling and/or to make a search therein for papers
and other effects
Q: What are the two criteria used determine whether the article on rohibition, Interruption and Dissolution of
Peaceful Meetings would be violated?
A: Two criteria to determine whether this article would be violated:
Dangerous tendency rule applicable in times of national unrest such as to prevent coup detat.
Clear and present danger rule applied in times of peace. Stricter rule.
Q: What happens when the act is NOT directed to the religious belief itself and there is no intention of
causing so serious a disturbance as to interrupt a religious ceremony?
A: The crime committed is only UNJUST VEXATION (People v Nanoy).
Q: What is a charivari?
A: It includes a medley of discordant voices, a mock serenade of discordant noises made on kettles, tin, horns, etc.
designed to annoy or insult
Q: What crime is committed when a public officer involved is not a custodian of the prisoner at the time the
prisoner was made to escape?
A: He is liable under Art. 156 i.e. delivery of persons in jail, and not under Art. 223 for Infidelity in the custody of a
prisoner.
Q: What happens when a prisoner returns within 48 hours after a disorder in jail?
A: He is given credit or deduction from the remaining period of their sentence equivalent to 1/5 of the original term of
the sentence.
Q: May forgery can be committed through the use of genuine paper bills?
A: Yes, in People v Galano, genuine paper bills that have been withdrawn from circulation were used by giving them
the appearance of some other true and genuine document.
Q: In the falsification of public or official documents, is the idea of gain or the intent to cause damage
necessary?
A: No, because the principal thing punished is the violation of public faith and destruction of the truth as therein
solemnly proclaimed. The existence of a wrongful intent to injure a third person is not necessary when the falsified
document is a public document (Siquian vs People). This is also true with respect to commercial documents, because
as to this kind of document, a credit is sought to be protected (Reyes).
Q: May a drug dependent who is found guilty of the use of dangerous drugs voluntarily submit himself for
treatment and rehabilitation?
A: Yes. The drug dependent may, by himself/herself or through his/her parent, spouse, guardian or relative within the
fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity, apply to the Board or its duly recognized representative, for treatment and
rehabilitation of the drug dependency. Upon such application, the Board shall bring forth the matter to the Court which
shall order that the applicant be examined for drug dependency (Section 54, Article VIII, RA 9165).
Q: How will a drug dependent who is under the voluntary submission program and is finally discharged from
confinement in the Center be exempt from criminal liability?
A:
1. He/she has complied with the rules and regulations of the center, the applicable rules and regulations of
the Board, including the after-care and follow-up program for at least eighteen (18) months following
temporary discharge from confinement in the Center
2. He/she has never been charged or convicted of any offense punishable under this Act, the Dangerous
Drugs Act of 1972 or Republic Act No. 6425, as amended; the Revised Penal Code, as amended; or
any special penal laws
3. He/she has no record of escape from a Center
4. He/she poses no serious danger to himself/herself, his/her family or the community by his/her
exemption from criminal liability (Section 55, Article VIII, RA 916)
Q: Is trial or authoritative judicial declaration necessary before a prosecution of a case for violation of Art.
202 necessary?
A: Yes, Before a criminal action against a judge for violation of Articles 204 and 205 can be entertained, there must
be a trial or authoritative judicial declaration that his decision or order is really unjust which may result from either an
action of certiorari or prohibition in a higher court (De Vera v. Pelayo, 2000).
Q: What is the distinction between the Forfeiture Law and other Graft Laws?
A: Forfeiture law punishes the conveyance of the ill-gotten wealth to other people to avoid forfeiture, and not the act
of having ill-gotten wealth per se, which is what the other laws punish.
Q: When can kidnapping be appreciated separately from homicide/murder of the person detained?
A: In People vs. Ramos - Where the person kidnapped is killed in the course of the detention, regardless of whether
the killing was purposely sought or was merely an afterthought, the kidnapping and murder or homicide can no longer
be complexed under Art. 48, nor be treated as separate crimes, but shall be punished as a special complex crime
under the last paragraph of Art. 267, as amended by R.A. 7659.
Q: What are the qualifying circumstances in case of kidnapping and serious illegal detention?
A:
1. Purpose is to extort ransom.
2. When the victim is killed or dies as a consequence of the detention.
3. When the victim is raped.
4. When victim is subjected to torture of dehumanizing acts.