Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
This example problem on the course is to calculate the eddy current distri-
bution, loss in the melt (the liquid metal in the bath) and coil impedance of
the induction heating bath shown in Figure 1.6. The bath has rotational
symmetry around its vertical axis, but is supplied by a "racetrack'' style
coil, making it a 3-dimensional problem. . One of the objectives is to com-
pare the results with a steel bath and a ceramic (non-conducting) bath.
potentials are used, although these are set automatically dependent on the
material. The electric scalar potential is also solved in the conducting
regions to ensure current continuity. The results are written to a binary data-
base .op3 file, and the .res file contains the log of the analysis.
The same model is also run in the transient simulation module ELEKTRA-
TR
Script
Bath cylinder
Click on OK
Select the Pick Select the face of Cylinder1 at Z=3 and, using
faces ... the context sensitive menu, select Shell (or
use Operations => Shell from the menus)
icon
Click on OK.
Melt cylinder
Click on OK
Select the Select Cylinder2 and, using the context sensi-
Pick tive menu, select Cell properties (or use
cells... icon Properties => Cell properties from the
menus)
Click on OK
Select the Pick Select the side and base outer faces of the bath
faces ... (3 faces in total)
icon
Click on OK
Properties => Face properties ...
Click on OK
The outer boundary of the model will be spherical and will be 4 times
larger than the radius of the largest dimension in the model. In the far-field,
default boundary conditions are used.
Before defining the model symmetry and boundary conditions, the type of
simulation to be performed should be defined, as not all symmetries are
valid for some analysis modules.
Using the pull down menu, set the Shape of background to Sphere and the
value of R in Spherical Scale Factors to 4. Set the Reflection in coor-
dinate planes to be Tangential magnetic for the YZ and ZX planes
Click on OK
The model body can now be created. This will add the background region
of air, enforce the symmetry and the layering.
Two views of the model body showing the overall model and the layering in
the bath
The racetrack conductor is created with its local Y-axis equivalent to the
global Z-axis. Consequently, it is necessary to access 3 of the tabs used in
defining the racetrack conductor before accepting the definition.
Select the The cross-section of the coil is 0.25 x 2.25 and it is positioned such that its
Racetrack closest distance to the wall of the bath is 0.5. Its base is at the same height as
the base of the melt.
icon
The Current density is 2 x 106 and the Tolerance for the Biot-Savart cal-
culation is 1 mT. Set the Drive label to d1. This will be used when the
model is later run in transient mode. In Local coordinate system 2, set the
origin to (0,0,0) and all three Euler angles to 90 (degrees)
Click on OK
Surface meshing Creation of the finite element mesh is performed in two stages. All surfaces
of the model are meshed with triangles initially. After the surface mesh is
complete, the volume mesh of tetrahedra can be created.
Click on OK
Volume meshing Using the surface mesh on the faces of each cell, the volume mesh for each
cell is generated in turn.
Material The analysis will initially be run using a steel bath assuming properties of
properties relative permeability = 5 and electrical conductivity = 2.2 x 106 S/m. At a
frequency of 1 Hz, this gives a skin depth of about 0.15 metres. However,
the wall thickness of the bath is 0.25 metres - so not much flux (and hence
induced current) is expected to penetrate to the melt.
Highlight the material called bath and set the Relative permeability to 5
and the Conductivity to 2.2 x 106.
Analysis data The only data that needs to be changed from default values for the ELE-
KTRA-SS analysis is the frequency of operation.
Highlight the 50.0, set the New frequency value to 1 and click on Replace
Click on OK
Create the OP3 The file name for the analysis database is bath.op3 and the model has been
file constructed in SI units (length unit is metres, current density is in A / sq.
m). The title is optional
Click on OK
Adding a second An alternative material for the bath will also be examined. The steel bath
case will be replaced by a high temperature ceramic material. In an ELEKTRA
analysis, only magnetic and conducting properties of the material are used
- that is, dielectric properties are ignored. This is generally a reasonable
assumption when the wavelength of the electromagnetic field is much
longer than the dimensions of the structure. Consequently, the non-con-
ducting, non-magnetic ceramic will have identical properties to air as far as
ELEKTRA is concerned.
Highlight the Material called bath and click on the Set to air button
The second case can be added to the existing database bath.op3. Adding
multiple cases to a database where the mesh remains unchanged is useful
for reducing the data storage requirements. The mesh is only stored once.
Monitoring progress
The program reports when major stages of the analysis are complete and
the amount of CPU and elapsed time used at each stage.
Whilst the analysis is being carried out, a window will be visible showing
progress of the analysis. A second advantage of multiple cases in the same
database can be seen. The Biot-Savart field calculations to compute the
right hand side of the equations remain unchanged between the two cases.
Consequently, these values can be recovered from the first calculation, sav-
ing computer time.
Post Processing
Initially the basic model will be displayed, then the conductor will be
removed to enable the fields and currents on the bath to be seen more
clearly.
View the magnitude of the current density (JMOD) over the surface of the
model.
Select the 3D Using the pull-right arrow, set the Field com-
display icon ponent to Jmod
Click on OK
This display can be further enhanced by adding vectors of the induced cur-
rent onto the display.
Select the 3D Select the Vectors button and using the pull-
display icon right button set the Vector to J with a Scaling
factor of 2 x 10-7
Click on OK
To examine the imaginary part of the solution the user requests results at
TIME=90 i.e. 90 around the a.c. time cycle.
Alternatively, the variables RJX, RJY, RJZ, IJX, IJY and IJZ are available,
which are the real and imaginary components of Jx, Jy and Jz respectively.
Click on OK
Select the This will leave the same settings for the con-
Refresh icon tour component and the vectors
It can be seen from these 2 displays that the largest eddy current densities
are in the steel and not much current is flowing in the melt.
To view the eddy current in the melt, the scale of the contour display can
be changed or the bath material can be removed. The second of these
options is used
Click on OK
Select the Accept the default setting. This gives the time
Energy, average energy over one cycle
power and
force icon
The value of energy that is calculated is the time average stored energy and
power, over the whole problem space (including symmetry replications).
Both take the form W = A + B cos ( 2t + C ) and the time-average part is (A).
Then the inductance can be calculated from:
2W e
Induc tan ce = -----------2- Henrys, where We is the stored energy in the system.
I rms
The peak mmf applied to the coil is 1.125 x 106 Ampere-turns, specified by
the user in the Modeller (X-section = 2.25 x 0.25, density = 2 x 106). We
shall assume this is produced by a coil of 90 turns carrying 12500 Amps
(peak).
The expression for the inductance can be calculated within the software
simply by setting up a new variable and using the system variable energy
which was calculated above.
Select User Double click on Constants => Type variable name and type #inductance.
variable Tab to the Expression field and enter 2*energy/(12500/sqrt(2))**2. Tab to
calculator Description and enter Inductance for steel.
button
o
Click on Load and Refresh
In this simulation, the eddy currents in the melt are much larger so the scale
of the vectors needs to be reduced.
Any of the previous calculations can be repeated for the second case. For
example, Figure 1.8 shows the calculation for the inductance.
The inductance has increased by 35%. The bath and melt are acting simi-
larly to the secondary winding of a transformer. When the bath is made of
steel the eddy current reaction field is stronger than when the eddy currents
are only induced in the melt for the ceramic bath case.
The induction heating model with the ceramic bath will be simulated dur-
ing the first 2 cycles of the AC excitation to examine these switch on
effects.
ELEKTRA-TR ELEKTRA-TR has 2 options for time-stepping through the transient anal-
data ysis - a fixed time-step or an adaptive time-step. In this simple example, a
fixed time-step will be used. Adaptive time-stepping allows the user to
select the accuracy to which the solution will be calculated. The time-step
will be reduced or increased to achieve the required level of accuracy.
Repeat this process for values 0.5, 1.25, 1.5 and 2.0
Click on OK
The ELEKTRA-TR data is now complete.
Click on OK
If the model was re-loaded from the .opc file, it has returned the material
properties of the bath to steel. Adding a case to an existing .op3 database
does not create a new .opc file. Repeat the instructions to set the bath mate-
rial to air as shown in Adding a second case on page -18.
Drive function The drive function specifies how the excitation of a coil, circuit component
or boundary condition varies with time. The Drive Label of the coil was
set to d1 which will be assigned as a sinusoidal drive at 1 Hz with 0 degrees
phase lag.
Click on OK
Running the The analysis could use the same bath.op3 database as for the steady state
Analysis AC simulations. However, for this exercise, a new database will be cre-
ated. Repeat the instructions Create the OP3 file on page -17 to make a
new database called bath_transient.op3.
Figure 1.10 through Figure 1.13 show the eddy currents in the melt at 0.25,
0.5, 1.25 and 1.5 seconds respectively. Since this is a sinusoidal drive, 0.25
and 1.25 seconds correspond to the in-phase and 0.5 and 1.5 seconds to the
quadrature parts of the solution - that is, the real and imaginary parts of the
complex ELEKTRA-SS solution. It can be seen that the current density
patterns at 0.25 and 1.25 are very similar, and 0.5 and 1.5 are also very sim-
ilar. Also the 0.5 and 1.5 patterns are very similar to the imaginary part of
the case 2 ELEKTRA-SS solution in bath.op3 (see page -27). This indi-
cates that there are very few switch-on transients and the ceramic induction
heating bath is close to steady state performance even in the first cycle.