Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
B.K. College of pharmacy, Nagzira Road, Sakoli, Dist- Bhandara (M.S) India;
2
I.S.F. College of pharmacy, G.T. road moga, Ghal kalan, Punjab, India;
ABSTRACT
In the present study, an attempt has been made to improve the physiochemical stability of
nifedipine by complexation using weak cation-exchange resins, indion 204 and indion 264 to eliminate
light decomposition tendency of drug. Tablets were prepared by Indion 204: drug complex using
optimized ratio with different diluents. Irradiation test for drug degradation was carried out by
comparing pure nifedipine drug, methanolic drug solution, resinates and prepared tablets formulation to
determine differences in the effectiveness of artificial light and natural indirect sunlight sources. The
tested resinate of nifedipine and optimized formulation was likely to be photostable up to at least 10
weeks of continuous artificial and natural day light exposure. In-vitro drug release studies showed more
than 90% drug release within 30 min and exhibited similar dissolution profile with commercial tablets.
Indion 204 was found to be better complexing agent for reducing the photosensitivity and to design
stable nifedipine tablets.
KEYWORDS
Nifedipine, Photostability, Indion 204, Indion 264 and Ion-exchange resin
1
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
3
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
50
process results in more surface area for ion-
exchanged. Hence the batch process is suitable for 40
Table 2
Effect of pH on Drug Loading. Figure 1
Percent of nifedipine loaded on resinate ratio
% Drug content per gram of resinate (MeanSD, n=3)
pH Ratio (mean S.D., n=3)
Increase in the amount of complexing agent
Indion 204 Indion 264 increases the amount of drug adsorbed as number
1 37.25 0.28 34.45 0.48 of sites increases, but the drug content per gram of
2 40.2 0.61 37.5 0.25 the complex decreases. Thus resinate prepared by
4 1:2 44.10 0.49 40.10 0.60 batch method using indion in drug: resin ratio of
1:2 at pH 6 gave optimum drug loading. In-vitro
6 48.12 0.15 46.50 0.65
release profile of complex is shown in Figure 2.
8 42.06 1.42 41.06 0.12 Studies showed that drug-Indion 204 complexes
better release than drug- indion 264 complexes.
The loading of nifedipine on cation- While more than 90% of drug release from indion
exchange resin is an equilibrium process, which 204 and indion 264 in just 30 min and 40 min
depends upon the presence of the cations in the respectively. Reichenberg (1953) in his study
solution. This is dictated by the pH of solution, discussed release of drug from ion-exchange
which may affect the amount of ionized drug resins. He described release of two types (1) Film
5
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
120
diffusion, which is dependent on ingoing ion
100
concentration, and (2) particle diffusion which is
Figure-3
X-ray powder diffraction pattern of a) pure nifedipine b) indion 204 resin c) physical
mixture of drug-resin d) drug-resin complex (resinate)
6
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
The x-ray powder diffraction showed crystalline peak characteristics of drug were masked and
characteristic amorphous characteristics of the complex were prevalent confirming the complexation
(fig.3). The characteristics hump shown by a typically amorphous structure of resin was also not seen in
drug resinates and the physical mixture of two (drug and resin) showed mixed pattern. Studies have
shown that the molecules of entrapped drug changes from the crystalline to amorphous state.
Photostability of nifedipine was determined after exposure to indirect natural light and continuous
artificial light. Studies has shown that natural and 20 W tungsten artificial light have similar effects in
the photodecomposition.
Table 2
Time methanolic
Nifedipine Formulated Protected
solution of Resinate 204 Resinate 264
drug tablet marketed tablet
nifedipine
Artif Natu Artifi Natur Artifi Natu Artifi Natu Artifi Natu Artific
Natural
icial ral cial al cial ral cial ral cial ral ial
light
light light light light light light light light light light light
7
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
Nifedipine methanolic solution exposed to for that artificial light can not be used alone in
natural indirect sunlight was completely photodecomposition studies. Photodegradaition of
photodecomposed in 15 min. The result shows that nifedipine methanolic solution and nifedipine
the efficacy of natural indirect sunlight in powder after artificial light and natural irradiation
photodecomposition of nifedipine is more than are shown in Table 2. Photodegradation of
artificial light due to the fact that the intensity of nifedipine powder measured as the loss percentage
natural light. Therefore, these results are evidence of nifedipine, exceeded 8.0 % and 17.0%, in
8
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
9
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
Figure-4
IR spectra of pure nifedipine, physical mixture of resin-drug and resinates of nifedipine after
irradiation and non-irradiation
Results of angle of repose, bulk and tapped density, Carr's index and Hausner's ratio are depicted
in Table 3. The results showed that resinates exhibits good flow and good packing. When the %
10
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
The formulated tablets were evaluated for observed in the dissolution characteristics of the
disintegration time, weight uniformity, % tablets formulated and marketed. All dissolution
friability, and content uniformity as shown in parameters indicated rapid and higher dissolution
Table 4. The formulated tablets in all the cases of nifedipine from formulated tablets than market
possessed good mechanical strength with tablets. Dissolution efficiency (DE30) values were
sufficient hardness. The friability values of all the calculated as suggested by Khan20.
formulations were within the limit i. e less than Dissolution efficiency (DE30) and
1.0%. All the tablets from each formulation passes disintegration time of formulation F2 and F3 was
weight variation test, as the % weight variation found to be poor than F1. Figure 3 shows that
was within the pharmacopoeial limit. In-vitro formulated and conventional tablets showed
disintegration times as per IP were determined for dissolution and percent cumulative drug release at
all formulations. It was found that tablets prepared the end of 55 minute was 98 %. The formulation
with MCC as diluent, disintegrated faster than F1of nifedipine with microcrystalline cellulose as
lactose and maize starch. This is because the filler was found to be optimum as it shows lowest
tablets comprising water-soluble filler tends to disintegration time with desired dissolution rate.
dissolve rather than disintegrate. The dissolution This study indicates that nifedipine tablet prepared
parameters of formulated and marketed tablets are from drug: Indion 204 (1: 2) complex might be
summarized in table 4. No variations were suitable for commercial supply dosage form.
11
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
Figure 3
In-vitro drug release from nifedipine tablets (Mean SD, n = 3)
cumulative % drug release
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (Minute)
Folrmulation-F1 Marketed tablet
Table 4
Physical properties and dissolution characteristics of nifedipine tablet formulated and marketed
samples
Weight
Disintegration % Content T50 DE30 K
Formulation Uniformit
time (s) Friability Uniformity (%) (min-1)
y
F1 3121.2 241.22.36 0.68 98.850.73 14.5 40.18 0.02358
Market Sample
(Uncoated 319.20.5 3011.42 0.75 98.71.2 12.5 39.62 0.0230
tablets)
12
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
13
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010
14
www.ijpbs.net Pharmaceutics