Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h
Example: Flanged Walls h/d < 0.25 0.25 < h/d < 4.0 h/d >4.0
Effective flange width on either side of web shall be smaller of actual Rectangular cross-sections
flange width, distance to a movement joint, or: 0.15
Flange in compression: 6t T-shaped and I-shaped sections
Flange in tension: 0.40
Unreinforced masonry: 6t Shear stiffness
Reinforced masonry: 0.75 times floor-to-floor wall height 0.35
Partially grouted walls
Analysis: distinction between 6t and 0.75 times floor-to-floor wall total cross-sectional area of face shells plus area of
height in compression is not important. Assumed effective width only grouted cells
results in a small shift of neutral axis.
Some people suggest increasing tension flange width by 1.5 for shear
capacity design and ductility checks. Reinforcement just outside
effective width can be participating.
Seismic Design of Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls
A Guide for Practicing Engineers
NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 9
k k
Ph 3 Ph Ph 3 Ph
Net area
3Em I n Av Ev 3Em I n Av Ev
Net moment
6t=48in.
0.157in Em 0.616in Em
of inertia
56in.
Shear area
Plan
Seismic Design of Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls Seismic Design of Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls
A Guide for Practicing Engineers A Guide for Practicing Engineers
NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 9 NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 9
Frame Models
RR = 1
RR = 4
RR = 1
RR = 5
RR = 5
For seismic, the diaphragm load would
Required: Distribution of force be distributed the same (assuming a
assuming: uniform mass distribution), but when
flexible diaphragm wall weights were added in, the forces
could be different.
rigid diaphragm.
0.2 kip/ft
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
RR = 4
RR = 1
50 ft 50 ft
Wall 3
Wall 2
RR = 5
Wall 1
1 The moment is generally
2 3.9 k 12.2 k 3.9 k
taken through chord forces,
3
which are simply the moment
Total divided by the width of the 3.9 6.1
x diaphragm. In masonry
Center of stiffness = 350/10 = 35 ft V (k)
structures, the chord forces 19.5 ft
-3.9
are often take by bond -6.1
Wall RR d (ft) RR(d) RR(d2) Fv Ft Ftotal beams. 38 38
1 4 -140 4900 3.9
2 5 75 1125 12.2
3 1 65 4225 3.9 M (k-ft)
Total 10 10250 0.0 20
-55
W14x68
W14x68
load from the diaphragm to the Face W16x40
shell bedding
End cells fully grouted
lateral force resisting system.
L 4x4x5/16 L 4x4x5/16
w
Moment Resisting Frame Braced Frame Masonry Shear Wall
k = 83.2 kip/in k = 296 kip/in k = 1470 kip/in
v v
Lateral force resisting systems at 24 ft o.c. Diaphragm assumed to be
concrete slab, E=3120ksi, =0.17, variable thickness, load of 1 kip/ft.
L/3 L/3 L/2 Diaphragm
Lateral Force
vL/2 vL/2 vL Resisting System
http://skghoshassociates.com/SKGAblog/viewpost.php?id=19
Shear Walls 38 Shear Walls 39
Diaphragm Behavior
Shear Walls 40