Karur To Dindigul Vol - Iiic of III (A B C D)

CONCESSION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

(Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways)
Government of India
G-5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarka,
-
NEW DELHI 100 075
TN (DK) EXPRESSWAYS LIMITED

Madhucon House, Plot No.-1129/A, Road No.-36,
Hitec City Road, Jubilee Hills,
HYDERABAD- 500 033
FOR
(i) Design, Construction, Development, Finance, Operation and Maintenance

of Km. 305.600 (End of Karur Bypass) to Km. 373.725 (Dindigul) and
(ii) Improvement, Operation and Maintenance of Km. 292.600
( Start of Karur Eiypass ) to Km. 305.600 ( End of Karur Bypass ) on NH-7
in the State of Tamil Nadu under North - South Corridor (NHDP Phase 11) on
Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis.
Contract Package No.: NS 2/BOT/TN-4
VOLUME: IIIc of 111(a,b,c,d)

Detailed Project Report (Karur Flyover)
2othApril 2006
TN OK) EXPRESSWAYS LIMITED
INDEX
1 SL.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. I

I
-- -
1 2 i
A TITLE INDEX
- - .. -
B KARUR BYPASS
I
I i I Bearing Design 250m 3 1 10 1

I 1
SUBSTRUCTURE
*
2
1
i Abutments
-
-
11
I
29
ii Pier 30 52
SUPER STRUCTURE
1
-- -
i Cross Girder ! 53 66-

i
--
ii-Design
- - Melhodrrlgy
.. 67 - 74
r--
iii j Superstruciurs 2FOm 75 1 180

, 75 1 1 0
a Inner long Girder
I,
1 1
b Mix.
111
I
113
I
.-nI c Outer Lang Girder

I
1
d Section Pro
.- -
I
1 177 179- -
e Coordination
I I I
E MISCELLANEOUS 1
I
i Repair of Structures 180

a
ii--
1 -Special Specifications
(MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT 8 HIGHWAYS)
GOVERNEMENT OF INDIA
-._
DETIALS OF PROPOSED FLYOVER AT KARUR ROTARY
INCLUDING APPROACHES FROM KM 297+787 TO KM 298+761
IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
LEA ASSOCIATES SOUTH ASIA PVT.LTD.

B-11E-27, MOHAN COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
MATHURA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110044
.y
MAY 2005
I
Project Title:
1 DESIGN CALCULATION FOR FLYOVER AT KARUR ROTATRY AT
I CHAINAGE 298+300 ON NH-7 IN THE STATE OF
TAMILNADU (INDIA)
I
I L
Client;
(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)
r 1
DocumenUFile No.: No. Of Sheets: Revision: Date: Dec. 2003

RO I
I I I
For The Approval M. Prepared By: LOKESH TYAGl
Checked By: LOKESH WAG1 Approved By: JPDAS
LEA ASSOCIATES SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED

B-I/-27, llnd Floor, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathua Road,
-
New Delhi 110 044
22 S
O L W A D C4C'-MTIm -
3 HORIZONTAL WAD CAIARATION
FT- = I N per krClO

53-05 C
F- r &.a, KN par bsrlnp
Cafficicnt of wrtieal seismic force = 0.03
. ..
Avenge height upto mffit l e d = 6m
Height of C m h b i t = 0.8 m
Ctepthof dcckshb = 0m
a p t h o f S y w r ~ = 2.2 m
wghtafC6dsupermwtvc 7.5 m
w
P -
From IRC: 6-2000 CI-212.3
79.75 bCg/m2
F~dklal = 9.73 KN per b i n g
fmm IRC: 6-2000CI-212.4
Lnt.mlWindfwaonLkLood= 300 Kg. Pa running m
Furna = 6.7 KIN prr bmriq
M d Wind force = 450 Kg. Per running m

F T ~ Y= 18.3 KN par bsariw
Mininum dnd prurun =

(on unlaadrd Structure)
f~.hl*.l = 29.2%KN per h r i r g - -.
. -.
So, M W i n d f a K l fw = t9.28 KN prr brLp \ J~;;',,.<
~EARINGD~IGN25OU/Horirontol~Lorrd
'7'
TJ
dl.. - 005
v;<; c ..
AS per previous Code flRC:&2MH3)
Nonnal Cam Sekmlc Came Wind Case Dnign Forceo
vmax 1482.25 1157.94 1482.25 1482.26
V min 724.65 765.86 724.65 724.65
0.00 53.05 29.28 53.05

F T-
33.33 46.04 33.33 46.04
Fcono
BEARINGDESZGN250~Swnmaryof Load
4.1 D u r b o T ~ rise
m
- 50C
O.oOool17 / %
25 m
1n'L0a7
7.31 rnm
4.3 Rotetion
h
Maximum Dssd lord moment
- -
MadmumLivsmmambnt
Modulus of Elmwty L
Moment of Inertia ( I )(at ~tuppw)) *

As per IRC :83-(Part-ll) 1987
CI-916.3.5
aa -
.aU
-
1.0 Design of b i d d bstomrric Bearing as per IRC: 83 (Part R)-1987
1.1 BASIC DATA
Baarkrgbimcnrian&PllopsrHcr
Length I = mm
h d t h b= mm 9hp
Si& cover c = mm
f nttmnal layer hi = mm
Steel thk. t,= mm Yd= C
No.of Steel plate n = nos B.n%.mm= c

shore w l l =~ ~ 14 a.2614- C
Shew Moduhrs (6)= WJqrnrn Toto
v
Vertical Load (KN] btwl toad (KN) . I-LtKN)
Y, b'ma h n y H ,mm
1982.2 724.6 46.0 53.1 J0.24
-
1.) - m 8-fW langmdd -T

A,, (in mm) AM (in mn\)
Movement due to Tempe~ture 7.31 0.00
Movuntnt due to Shrinkage + Creep 2.38 0.00
-4
. i: 1.4 Rotatbmon W n g
a (radian)
, a H (dm)
A buetoDadLoad,SIbL 0.00303 0.06000
bllL to PPCJtress 0.00000 0.00000
Due to Live Load 0.00108 0.0000
Rotationdue t o Installation I m c c ~0.00000 6.06600
1.5 catmete RPptrtiu

Grade of Concrete for Pedestal 35 Mpa
Pefmissibk Oinct Compressive Stress, cr, 8.75 Mpo OK
1 . 6 P ~ ~ & P r r * l l . d b l s S t r s u I n ~ ~ ~
Length of Pedestal (Across Bridge Axis) = 860 mm dK
Breadth of Pedestal (Along Bridge Axis) = 675 mtn OK
1L
-4 A1= 5808w Id
A2 =
AUA2=
198924 nwt'
2
.--
-. -
.
6.0 Desim of Reinforced Elastomeric &wino as wr IRC:83 Part IIl-1987
6.1 k i n a Dimension
=
Length I, 560 mm Eff. length (I.)= 548 mm
B d t h b. = 375 mm Eff. b d t h (b.). 363 mm
Side cover c = 6 mm Eff. areu (A& 198924 sqmm
1nterml lap- hi = 10 mm Shape Factor(S,)= 10.92
Outer lap- h, = 5 mm Shore Hardness = 60
Steel thk. t,= 4 mm Shear Modulus(b)= 1.0 N/sqmm
No.of Steel plate n = 6 nos
Total Elastomer. (h)- 60 mm
Total Height of Bearing (t)= 84 mm
t,,=[2*t0 + (n-l)*ti + n"t.1
C
/.
6.3 Mowmatt o f k i n a
,A (in mm) A~,J(in mm)
Movement due to Temperature 7.31 0.0
Movement due to Shrinkage + C r u p of concrete 2.38 0.0
Movement due to Prestress 0.00 0.0
Total L#lgitudiwl MovMwnt 9.69 0.0
6.4 Rotation of Bc<lri~ (yd (radian) % (radian)
otation due t o Dad Load & SIDL+Prcstws 0.003034 0.000000

Rotation due to L i w Laad 0.001077656 0
Rotation duc t o Instdhtion Imccurocy 0 0
Total Rotatition 0.00411 0.00000
ad = 0.00411
4.
6.5 Chock for Bearirwr 6Q4mchv as Wr CI. 936.3.3

=
OJ Idb~ 1.493 OK
fi d)
60 mm h= OK
e) ni = 10 mm OK
d) Shape Foctor = 10.92 OK
6.6 Check for Translation as pcr CI. 916.3.4
I r-
6.7 Check for Rotation as ps CI. 916.3.5

\ : ,<:>/
I
Design of S ~ p m t m c t n n I
6.8 Check fa, Fridion as wr CI. 916.3.6

a) ~MMI= 7.451 OK
b) ad,,i,)= 3.643 Mpa OK
VmR(KN) a, ( Mpa ) 0.2+0. la, yd
724.6484 3.6428 0.56000 0.4700
6.9 C h u k for Total Shear Stress us mr CI. 916.3.7

a) c = 1.0237 pa
b) 4
' 0.4749 Mpa
C) = 0.7613 Mpa
d) Totd ~.+b*r,= 2.2599 Mp
6.10 Cheek for Stress in concrete below Boarim
rn Stress bclow b i g .ebb = 7.06 Mpa
-_- Length of Pcdtstol (Across Bridge Axis) = 860

Breadth of Pedestal (Along Bridge Axis) = 675
A1 = 580500
A2 = 198924
AVA2 = 2
Allowable Strus. a,, = 12.37 Mpa
Flyover at Karur Design of Abutment for flyover
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR COLCMN SECTJON flinrmal Case)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
. - Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD)
Load Case (N=Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic)
Permissible mid wmpressive stress in concrete (a,)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete ( a 3
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (acb)
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,3
Modular Ratio
-
13 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
Effdive cover (d'=d"441/2)
Diameter of column (d)
Bar Diameter (I))
n
Number of bars
-. Reinforcement area (&,)
Reinforcement %
-
1.4 Properties of uncracked section
Cross-sectional area of uncracked section
Moment of inertia of uncracked section
Calculated direct compressive stress (a,&)
Calculated bending compressive stress (rr,b,d)
Interaction formula :
a,.d l o
, + add / a,, r 1.O
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (
a
,,
)
Mipa the ~ectlonas cracked section
-
1.5 Proverties of cracked section
Neutral axis depth (n)
Distance of centroid of cracked section from centre of circle
n
Cross-sectional area of cracked section
Moment of inertia of cracked section about its own centroid
Effective area of cracked section
Eccentricity of load from the centroid of the effective section
Net m t r i c i t y
Effective moment of inettia of d e d section
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CG* @,I)
Stress at neutral axis
-
1.6 Check for stress
Compressive stress in c o n m e (a&)
60.95 kglm2 (Safe)
-511.03 kg/cm2 (Safe)
Tensile stress in steel (~a)
DESIGN OF ClRCZ'JA.4RCOLUMN SECTION (Wind Care)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & '"t"for HYSD)
Load Case (N =Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic)
Permissible axial compressive stress in concrete (a,)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (a,3
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (a*)
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,,)
Modular Ratio
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (d')
Effective cover (d=d"+4/2)
h
Bar Diameter (4)
Number of bars
Reinforcement area (&
Reinforcement %
1.4 Pro~ertiesof uncracked section
Calculated direct compressive stress (a,,&)
Calculated bending compressive stress ( u ~ , ~ )
iJ,,d / a, + a*,csl/ a* I1.o
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (a,,,,) -27.572 kg/cm2
Desirn the section as cracked section
-
1.5 Properties of cracked section
Neufral axis depth (n)
h Distance of centroid of cracked section h m centre of circle
Net eccentricity
Effective moment of inetria of cracked section
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CGd (yell)
-
87.69 kg/cm2 (Safe)
Compressive s t m s in concrete (ack)
Tensile stress in steel (a,d -1128.14 kglcm2 (Safe)
Abut-Reinforcement-Wind
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR COLI3lN SECTlOY (Seismic Case)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m"for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD)
Permissible axial compressive stress in wncrete (a,)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (a,)
Permissible bending compressive sbess in concrete (a,)
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,)
Modular Ratio
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
Effective cover (d'=dv++I2)
Bar Diameter (4)
h
Number of bars
.- - Reinforcement area (As,)
Reinforcement %
-
Calculated direct compressive stress (amml)
Calculated bending compressive stress ( Q , ~ , ~ ~ )
a,& / a, + a*,, / a,, I1.0
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (s,,)
Design the section as cracked section
-
1.5 Proverties of cracked section
Neutral axis depth (n) 67.19 crn
n Distance of centroid of cracked section from centre of circle 60.65 cm
Cross-sectional area of cracked section 9264.94 cm2
Moment of inertia of cracked section about its own centroid 2908557.75 cm4
Effective area of cracked section 10944 cm2
Eccentricity of load from the centroid of the effective section 51.35 cm
Net eccentricity 62.77 cm
Effective moment of inetria of cracked section 15712559.37 cm4
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CGfi(y,l) 22.87 cm
Stress at neutral axis 0.01
-
Compressive stress in wncrete (a,k) 111.14kglcm2 (safe)
Tensile stress in steel (qbt) -1899.13 kg/rm2 (Safe)
Abut-Reinforcement-Seismic LASA
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Load Case (N = Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (ad
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (a*)
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,,)
Modular Ratio 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (dm)
Effective cover (d'=d"+@)
Bar Diameter (4)
n Number of bars
Reinforcement area ( 4 3
Reinforcement %
-
Calculated direct compressive stress
Calculated bending compressive stre~s(a&,&
,,,a a +
I, I a* 5 I .O
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (
a
,,
)
-
1.5 Pro~ertiesof cracked section
A Distance of centroid of m k e d section from centre of circle
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CGa (yd)
-
42.94 kglcmZ (Safe)
Compressive stress in concrete (a&)
Tensile stress in steel (a,*) -326.94 kg/rm2 (Safe)
Abut Reinforcement-Normal LASA

DESTGN OF CRClrLAR COCITMN SECTON (Wind Case)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Permissible axial compressive stress in wncrete (a,)
Permissible bending tensile stress in wncrete (0,)
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (acb) 133.33 kg/cm2
Permissible tensile stress in steel (an) 2666.60 kg/cm2
Modular Ratio 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover ( d )
Effative cover (d'=d"+4~2)
Bar Diameter (4)
n Number of bars
-. Reinforcement area (A,J
Reinforcement %
-
1.4 Proverties of uncracked section
Calculated direct compressive stress (a,.d)
Calculated bending compressive stress (a&,&)
Resultant compressive sbess in concrete (aqal) -2.733 kglcm2
Design the section as uncracked section
-
* Distance of centroid of cracked section from centre of circle
Cross-sectional asea of cracked section
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CGdFbmI)
-
Compressive stress in wncrete (a,,) (Safe)
Tensile stress in steel (a,d (Safe)
Abut-Reinforcement-Wind
Flyover at Ksrur Design of Abutment for flyover
nESIGN OF CRCLU,.4R COLUMN SECTTOY (Seismic Case)
-
1.1 LoadDab
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
M30
Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD) t (One Span Dislodged
Load Case (N =Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic) s Condition)
Permissible axial compressive stress in wncrete (a,) 112.50 kdcm2
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (ad 10.05 ks/Crn2
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (a*) 150.00 kdcm2
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,J 3000.00 kg/cm2
Modular R h o 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear wver (d")
Effective cover (d'=d"+~$L?)
Bar Diameter (4)
n Number of bars
Reinforcement area (A,)
Reinforcement %
-
Calculated direct compressive strffs (a,,d)
Calculated bending compressive stress (a*.d)
, +,,n
u , , ~I a < 1.0
1aCb
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (aRd)
Design the section as uncracked section
-
Distanoe of centroid of cracked section from centre of circle
n
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CGd (yd)
-
26.52 kg/rm2 (Safe)
Compressive stress in concrete (rick)
Tensile stress in steel ( a d -68.01 kg/cm2 (Safe)
LASA
Wi of Abutment for Flyover
REACTION W E TO DL
. . . .
i
.---.-,'5 1 ...,.......0 ....
! , , . , , ,
,
..Mi.5 ,.~_i
--
i..-.-.?5........... ..........................
1 I . O......................
6n=.5 ......
"j
;--2~..".--j..-! ,.,-.. i,-.- ~.-i-,$%.3L.,J
EXTlW DUE TO SlDL
. 15 C
' 2 1 0 :
j._"".39 ......,.-.-"... .--y-.--
,--... c_ ?7&4-.1
i4.!~2]D.12!5 x-j
i 51
l.....
j 2 0 213:YIj_j
TdLnanmmnt = 188 437
Totd SlDL madim on abutment 52.976 Tonne
DesQn DL +SHK for abutment = 241.413
Flyover at Karur Design of Abutment for Flyover
Design of abutment & abutment foundation

Input data:-
Finished Road Level FRL = 507.572 m
Bed level BL = 499.210 m
Foundation top level = 4962f0 rn
Bearing Level = 505.188 m
SuDerStNctum Data:-
Construction of New bridge (1) or widening (0) 7 1 (enter 1 if new const~ction,0 for widening)
Superelevation = am %
Right Span of the bfidge = 22.80
Span c/c of abutments = 28-00
Left Span of the bridge = 22.80 m
Span c/c of abutments = 25.00 m
Widthof wm'ageway = 8.75 m
Overell width of Superstructure = 9.750 m
Width of crash bam'er = 0.50 m
Wdth of safety keMmtpath = 0.00m
FootpaWSafety kerb is provided on -
- 0 srde
Thickness of safety k e r w t p a t h = 0.00m
Live load considered on FP+Kerb = SO0 Kum2
h Overall Depth of PSC girder = 2.100 m
.-
Constants:-
Density of concrete -
- 2.5 T/m3
W i g h t of w r i n g c ~ e t -
- 9.2 T/m2
Grade of Concrete (~ubsfru~ture) =M 30 MPa.
Grade of Concrete (superstructure) =M 40 MPa.
DATA FOR abulment DESIGN:-

Overall Hergth of Substructum -
- 10262 mm (abutment cap/pedesta/ top to pile cap topl
Die of abutment - 2000 mm
Dia of abutment - 2000 mm
abutment Cap Width in Long Dim. - 2400 mm
abutment Cap Length in Trans Dim. - 9750 mm
Straight Depth of abutment Cap - 500 mm
Varying Depth of abutment Cap - 750 mm
Size of bearing (Elast brg assumed site) = 400 x 530 x 90 x 3 Nos
Size of Pedestals (if bearing is provided) = 700 x 830 x 250 x 3 Nos
-
-
Dia of abutment 2000 mm
Dia of abutment - 2000 mm
Total straight Height of abutment -- 9012 mm
Innut f i r /Q&S from s u ~ c t u for

m abutment (LL on one span)
25.00 M 25.00 M
Dead Load of Superstntcture in~iudingSlDL = f81,o r 0T
Class A 1 Train = 33.3 T
Cbss A 2 Train = 66-61
Class 70R wheel 1 Train = 77.5 T
Class 70R Tracked 1 Train = 64.21
Live lo& Max Reeection = 91-76 T
Live load Min Reaction -- 0.0 T
Braking force = 20.0T (20% of 1000 )
Abt-Designllnput Data LASA

Typical design calculations for RCC abutment

jHeiaht of abutment = 10.262
Analvsis & Computation of Loads:-
Deslan Data for Su~ersbucture:-
C/C Distance bet" Bearings = 22.80 m
U C Distance betn abutments = 25.00 m
Cam'ageway Wdth = 8.75 m
Overall Widh of Deck. = 9.75 m
Overall Depth of superstrucfure = 2.100 m
Desion Data forabutment :-
Overall Hegth of S u b S t ~ ~ t ~ r e = 10262 mm (8ed Block top to Footing Bottom)
Dia of abutment = 2000 mm
Dia of abutment = 2000 rnm
abutment Cap Wdth in Long Dim = 2400 mm
abutment Cap Length in Trans Di = 9750 mm
Straight Depth of abutment Cap = 500 mm
Varying Depth of abutment Cap = 750 mm
Length of Pedesfals = 700 x 830 x 250
Distance betn Pedestals = 3000 mm x Nos 3
Sire of Bearings ( mm ) = 400 x 530 x 90
Dia of abutment = 2001) mm
Dia of abutment = ZOO0 mm (cut water to ease water)
h Gmde of Concmte = 30 Wmm2 Allow-ten 67 Allow -a low T/m2
Total Height of abutment = 8672 mm
Radius of cut water/ ease water = 1000 mm
Density of Concrete = 2.50 T/ma
F m board = 6.262 m
References.
Calculation of Dead Load from Super Structure :-

25.00 0.00
Dead Load of superstructure on/! = 184.00 T 0.00 T
Kerb on LHS = 000 T 000 T
FP + rarltn9/cresh barner loading = 17.50 T 0.00 T @ O.7TIm for crash barrier
Dirt w d = 16.73 T 0.00 T
Max reaction from Vehicular Lded T
Braking force
#-
Abt-DesignIDesign of RCC Abutment "'yL*-

A) Calculation of Dead Load from Sub Structure :- -

I) From Pedestals (if anvl
Volume of I Pedestal = 0.7 x 0.83 X 0.25
= 0.14525m3
No: of Pedestal = 3 x 1
- 3 Nos
.: Total Volume = 0.14525 x 3 = 0.4358 rn3
.: Total Load = 0.43575 x 2.50 = 1.0894 T
From Circular abutment :-

Dia. Of abutment -- 2.00 m
Height of abutment - 8.67 rn Total Area of sf portim -- 3.14 m2
=
.: Total Volume =( 3.140 )X 8.67 = 27.23 m 3
.: Total Load = 27.23 x 2.5 t/m3 = 68.08 T
-
From Bed Block/ abutment Cae
Area inelevation - 0.5 x 9.75 + 5.875 x 0.75
= 9.28125 m Z
.: Total Volume = 9.28125 x 2.4
-- 22.275 m3
n .: Dead Load = 22.275 x 2.50
-4
Ootions For desIaninu abutment
I Max DL+LL on one snan+LWL+Beanm.
2 Max DL+LL on one soan+LWL+wind+Bearinq.
3 Max DL+LL on one wan+LWL+EQ+Bearina.
4 DL ofone w a n
5 DL of one wan+wind
6 DL of one wan+EQ
Brakin0 eRec( ' load on 1 span'
Braking Load 20.0 T
Height 10.7
For Elastameric Beadnu:- Fh Applied horizental bm

F= FhR+ Vr.Ltc
Vr Shear mting of Elestmeric bearings
0.2 mm.mebr of span
Ltc Movement of deck above bearing other than Mat due to applied
0.8 mm /m of span
For 25.00 m ofspan
Vr.Ltc - 6.00 tonnes
For 0.00 m of span

Vr.Ltc = 0.00 tonnes
F =FhL? + Vr.Ltc
For 25 mofspan F =FN2 + Vr.Ltc

n 16 tomes
Horizontal Eoed considered 16.00 T

moment about base of abutment( 10.7 171.7 Tm
Cenlifuual force:
Abt-DesignlDesign of RCC Abutment

The centrifugal force shaN be delrmined from the following equation (IRC-6:2000, clause-215)
C - - W v2
127 R
Where C = Centrifugal force
- W =
I
--
Loadin tons
0.0
Design
t
speed of vehicles
v
- 58.0 KMPH
R = Radius of curvature in meters
- w.0 m
C - 0.0 t
C e n t M ~ ~he l e = 0.00 t Distributed on Two abutments
per abutment
Eccentricrty of Centrifugal f0rce - Deck top Level +7.20 - Pile cap top level
- 13.56 m
Centrifugal Moment t 0.00 tm
Transv Eccentricrty
n Live Load Eccenblcitv Trans. ecc Load Moment
Tm
One Train of Class 70R 1.78 77.53 738.0
One Train of Class A 3.075 33.31 102.4 Tm
Two Trains of Class A 1.325 66.62 88.3 Tm
This ecc is opposite to the FP em.
live Load Eccentn'cltv Lona. ecc Loed Moment Load on longer Span only
One Train of Class 70R 0.00 77.53 0.0 Tm
Wind E n c t One span laid
Check for wind load (IRC 6: cl. 2f2.3) (Wind is taken on longer span for ~implicity)
Herght of deck from mid abutment 4.34 m
Height of deck abutment base 7.31 m
C . Exposed area of deck and railings
a) - 2600 ht x 25000 length
= 32 5 m2
avg ht above bed level 7.3 m
mm pressure = 2.40 KN/m2 (IRC 6: c1.212.3)
fom = 78 T
Moment at 57.0 Tm
a ,/'.
., -
b 7
,". <\
1.
+
- 4
1-21
fl---T4,'b,
;
?j - -.
A r'
I *
of RCC ~
~bt-Design/De~ign b ~ q ' ~ \ - .
,
Ama of abutment Cap

Re&
. 2400 x 500.00 =
min pmssure = 2.40 KWm2 (IRC 6: d.212.3)
Total Wnd Force 0.29 T
Moment at abutment base 2.8 Tm
avg ht abow bed level

min pressure =
Tot81 Wnd FOW
Moment at abutment base
abubnent Shaff
- 8672 x 2000 = 17.344
avg ht above bed level
min pressure =
Total Wnd Force
hbment at abutment base
Total WWid Force

n 12.6 T
Total Wind Moment at abutment bot 81.6 Tm
Wind spainsfmuing load (C!ass A In~Inl class A 20.3 m

Lengfh of CIass A train 203 rn class7m f52m
Wrnd presswe = - 63 T/m IRC 6: d.212.3
Force = 36 T
Moment el bas@= 268 Trn (Wind on LL at 1.5 m abow deck level)
F&
- 5.6 1
Mom& 81 b?tB= 41 # Trn
1 span laid
MaxmW wind m n h . (wflh 4
~ e 5 ,1
-g st mid ht of a b m f g9.38 Tm 0.00
Desgn Moment 8f a b u t m f base 7OB.M Tm 53.09 tm
Design Moment at abutment bast 108.4 Tm 53.7 Tm
s m t Force
= (O.Q(] (Seismic Zone 111)
one span wnstnrcted case

Total Hor Load =
Total Hor Moment =
AM-DesignlDesign of RCC Abutment

1 Max DL+LL on one span+Bearina /Braking

Check lor stress in abubnent
Design Axial load 434.8

20 9 Design Moment (tr) 218.9
tlve Load 91 8 Design Moment (long) 192.6
Wind farce
D L + t L ecc In Transverse Dim 218 9
Se~srnlcForces (Hor-long)
axial Mtr Mlong
Total Loads 434.8 218.9 192.6
2 Max DL+U on one swn+Besrina ~ L l m + W i n d

Check for stress In abutment

Design Moment (b) 327.4
Design Moment (long) 192.6
axial Mtr Mlong

TotalLoads 434.8 327.4 192.6
3 Max bL*tL on ane swn+8aarlnn/Braklna+EQ (LL is 50%)

Check for stress En abutment

Design Moment (tr) 218.9
I
DL.~ L 5cc
L ~nTransvetse Dim. i 218.9
Sersm~c(Hor-long) 1 20 6 - 1 1936
ax~al Mtr Mlong
Total Loads 389.0 218.9 386.i
4 DLof One S m n
Check for dress i n abutment

axial Mtr Mlong

Total Loads 326.4 80.9 192.6
6 DL vf O m Smn *wfnd

I I
anal - Mtr. Mlong
Total Loads 326 4 ' 107.s , 47.5
'. \
Abt-DesignlDesign of RCC Abutment

Daa@nd&utment for Flyover
ESSI In abutment
I I 1 Loaa I ecc I Moment
gbutment Dead ~ o a d ] 124 9 1 ;r I 09
Super ~ t r k u r e ~ o a d 2131 5 20 9
~tve Load I C 0 00 00 -
Bearangt +Bmk~ng 00 10 7 D0
1;hnd force [ I
DC+LL e m ~nTransverse Dm. 80.9
Sets-) I 18 5 111.8
axial M!T Mlong
Total Loads 326.4 80.9 132 7
A w , ~ w O m . I g nd RCC Abutment
Flyover at Karur Design of Pier for flyover
3000 1
L
- - .......--.-.-.- i.....----.-*.,,,,,........
- 3875 Y
diemeter
A) Ds&n d Cgnbhver Pombn in ffm T r a n s w D m .
C/S ama of Bed B k h / rn = 3.391 m2 (Transverse Vhw)
Cantilevered Length = 3.875171
= 3.391 x 2.40
- 8.14 m 3
Volume
Net Volune = 8.14 m 3 -
Dead load = 8.14 x 2.50 = 26.34 T
C.Gof Loed = 1.66 m
rectm~ triang part
D.Load Moment at face of abubnenf
h Load due to eoc of FP and kerb load=

DL+SIDL reection on bearing
A Net supersl~ctrereaction
Moment at abutment face
Direct bearing Due to Trans Moment

Liveload on bearing =( 30.59 T + 7.67 T ) x 1.133333 (impact far 70R)
C.G of Live Loed = 2.OQO m
Live load moment = 86.71 Tm
Z Moments = 247.1QTm
Nst Torsion in abutment cap = 20.917 Tm Maximum

~ pm. n t =~ /.7*(l
i +dh) 20.917
20.9x(l+ 7768.0
I.7 2m.o
m l s s i b l s shsses vide IW:2l- ZO@

mncmfe ISof gm& M 30.80
uC ~ C = 100 K Q / C ~ ~
a st = 2000 ~ ~ / c m *
h Modular Ratio, m = 10
n = 0.33
J = 0.89
(2 = 14.81
EffectiveDepth Reqd "&fP = /U Clear Cover
Bar Die
deff naqd: x 100000
x 240
= 86.47 cms c 116.8 cms K
0.
deff ~rovided = 125 - 5 3.2 = 116.80 cms
= M
ust x i x d
. Ast w d
As 1 = 8.0425 m 2
No of bars Reqd: =127.856 = $6 Nos
8.0425
Spacing of Bars = 240 -- 15.0 Crns
fr
SOpravide 32 mm dia bars . 150 mm c/c spacing
. . -.,.
Ast Provided 12868.0 mm2 - - - - - . ..
'
,\
7,
-
.4,_
I-
., - - 026
LASA
Design Of Abutment Cap
Tobl s b u = 88.83 + 13.91 = 11277' T
--, r = Y
Bxd
v m&*almrrrr#rmrscliwr
d m HRscfivsdrpndmmsC* 1023.93 mm
B =BW&dalrb
. .I = 112.8 x 10006 = 0.46 Nrnwn2
2400 x 1023.93
-
b = Ma0 mm
d = 1024 mm
P 0.62 K
f, = 30.00 -'
rc = 031 FUmrn2
rmex = 2.2 IrUmrn2
= V/M = 0.459 > 0.31 Mmn2
= 0.459 < 2.2 ~lk~wn' SAFE
Vsbal = V-c%W 36.6 T Slnar-RW.
= U ~ C X A ~ X ~
v8t
Aswmhg 4 12 dirdimqpo
A sv 3 452.16 mmd
U E r 200 hum2
Mar DL+U On o n span
..
Lad DO*. [ m i B&tml of Fmdo+km)

P. ssn w
r
YY*. UT' 21w.36 kNm
&=*l- 444730 W h
IC
C a h n face to storti*) of sbppirg In X dirfction
C o h n face t o Hart,*) of slopping In Y direchon ck&fu-bm+sh
-
kl presnre IK
Avg Effective Cover = 0095 m MI" Pressure K
A v q e Effective depth d = 1.505 m c h k ln XX d*r&
6ros WingPrcroln = 376 k~lm' L31c Way ShMr
&DSS Baring F w s w e : M+ DO kN/mZ Rndlrgmcunem )K
)K
<reelalong W d ~ r u t
I
Direction of Tmff LC
-.
v. w,m&w
II= w . 1w
-
.
HY' wd*i@ =
n' z 1.226 rn (Depth ef -lad X3x4) ,.:v/bld'=
b= I 131 m (Eff bapm of section at X3X4) bZ
T)ESTGN OF ClRCULAR COLC'MK SECTION (Normal Case)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("mufor Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD)
Load Case (N = Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (ad
Permissible bendig compressive stress in concrete (u*)
Permissible tensile stress in steel (0,J
Modular Ratio
-
13 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
Effective mver (d'=d"+41/2)
Bar Diameter (+)
n Number of bars
% Reinforcement area (&J
Reinforcement %
-
Calculated direct compressive stress (om,&
Calculated bending compressive stress (ecb.ul)
em,d/ua+OCb,d/cTC,, 5 1.0
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (a,&)
Desipn the section as cracked section
-
1.5 Prowrties of cracked section
n Cross-sectional area of cracked section
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of n e w axis below CGa (y4)

7
Compressive stress in concrete (ack) 80.69 kg/cm2 (Safe)

Tensile stress in steel (ed -615.15 kg/cm2 (safe)
LASA
DESIGN OF C1RCI:CAR COLUMN SECTION { W N CASE 1
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m"for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD)
Load Case (N = Normal. W = Wind, S = Seismic)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (a,)
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (a*) 133.33 k9/m2
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,3 2666.60 k#m2
Modular Ratio 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (8)
Effective cover (d'=d"W)
Bar Diameter (4)
Number of bars
Reinforcement area (A,J
Reinforcement %
-
Moment of inertia of unmked section
Calculated direct compressive stress (u,,d)
Calculated bending compressive stress (ah,d) 57.577 kg/cm2
u,,,Ia,+a~,,/q,~ 1.0
Resultant compressive stress in concrete ( c ~ , , ~ )
h. -
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neuhd axis below CGd b,)
-
11851 k g h 2 (Safe)
Compressive stress in concrete (acb)
Tensile stress in steel (IT& -1400.54 kg/cm2 (Safe)
LASA
DESIGN OF CIRCGLAR COLUMN SECTION (SEISMIC CASE 1

1.1 LoadData
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Permissible axial compressive stress in concrete (G,)
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (0,)
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (acb)
Permissible tensile stress in steel ( a 3
Modular Ratio
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
Effective cover (d'=dW+/2)
Bar Diameter (4)
n Number of bars
r,
Reinforcement area (A,,)
Reinforcement %
-
1.4 Prowerties of uncracked section
Calcdated direct compressive stress (G,,,~)
Calculated bending compressive stress (a&,&)
a,,dIa,+a,b,4/a,b 5 1.0
Resultant compressive s W s s in concrete (aaal)

Desieo the section as cracked section
4
-, -
n Cross-sectional m of cracked section
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CGd (yd)
-
132.23 kglcm2 (Safe)
Compressive stress in concrete (a&)
Tensile stress in steel (crSb) -1815.20 kglcm2 (Safe)
LASA
DESIGN 0FCtRCt:LAR COLUMN SECTION (Normal Case)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment @I)
-
1.2 Material Data
Grade of Con& M30
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & "t"for HYSD) t (One Span Dislodged
Load Case (N= Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic) n Condition)
Permissible axial compressive stress in concrete (a,) 75.00 kdcm2
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (o,) 6.70 kg/cm2
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (qb) 100.00 kg/cm2
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,J 2000.00 kg/cm2
Modular Ratio 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
EfFective cover (d'=d''w2)
Bar Diameter (4)
.n Number of bars
Reinforcement area (A,d
Reinforcement %
-
Cross-sectional area of unmcked section
Calculated direct compressive stress (a,,,)
Calculated bending compressive stress (o~~,,~)
a w , d / a , + u ~ , d / u ~ 51.0
Resultant compressive stress in concrete (aqd)
L .
7

Eccentricity of load from the centroid of the effktive section
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neutral axis blow CGeR(yd)
7
1.6 Checkforstress
Compressive stress in concrete (a&) 90.44 kg/cm2 (Safe)
Tensile stress in steel (u,d -1395.71 kg/cm2 (Safe)
LASA
DESTGN OF CTRCULr-2R COLITlMN SECTION CwlNn CASE)
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD) t (One Span Dislodged
Load Case (N= Normal, W = Wind, S = Seismic) w Condition)
Permissible axial compressive stress in concrete (a,) 100.00 kg/cm2
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (a,) 8.93 kg/cm2
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (a*) 133.33 kg/cm2
Permissible tensile stress in steel (a,,) 2666.60 kg/cm2
Modular Ratio 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
Effective cover (d'=d1'+/2)
Bar Diameter (4)
Number of bars
Reinforcement area (4,)
Reinforcement %
-
Calculated direct compressive stress (rr,,&)
Calculated bending compressive stress (ad,3
%,,I/ 0, + Scb,,~ / acb 1-0
Resultant compmsive stress in concrete (a,,,,)
Desien the section as cracked section
-
1.5 Promrties of cracked section
Distance of centroid of cracked section fmm centre of circle
h Cross-sectional area of cracked section
Eff'ective area of cracked section
Net eccentricity
Calculated distance of neutral axis below CG# (y,,)
-
62.92 kg/cm2 (Safe)
Compressive stress in concrete (a,d
Tensile stress in steel (a,d -740.86 kglcm2 (Safe)
LASA
DESTGF' OF CTRCTLAR COLtlMN SECTION (SEISMIC CASEL
-
1.1 Load Data
Axial Force (P)
Moment (M)
-
1.2 Material Data
.- * Grade of Concrete
Grade of steel ("m"for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD) t (One Span Dislodged
Load Case (N =Normal, W =Wind, S = Seismic) s Condition)
Permissible axial compressive stress in concrete (0,) 1 12.50 kg/cm2
Permissible bending tensile stress in concrete (0,) 10.05 kglcm2
Permissible bending compressive stress in concrete (crcb)
Permissible tensile stress in steel (ad
Modular Ratio 10
-
1.3 Geometric data
Clear cover (d")
Effective wver (a=-d"++12)
Bar Diameter (4)
+4 Number of bars
* Reinforcement area (&J
Reinforcement %
-
1.4 Properties of uncracked section
Moment of inertia of unuacked section
Calculated direct compressive stress (aw,&
Calculated bending compressive stress (a*,d)
am,d/ o", + G * , ~1 a* s 1.o
Resultant compressive stress in concrete ( D , ~ )
W i n the section as cracked section
-
fi Cross-sectional area of cracked section
Net eccentricity
EKective moment of inetria of cracked section
Calculated distanceof neutral axis below CGd (yo,)
-
Compressive stress in concrete (o,~) 9138 kg/cm2 (Safe)
Tensile stress in steel (qb3 -1418.97 kg/cm2 (Safe)
COL-REINFISeismic Case LASA

Flyover at K a ~ r W i n of Pier for flywer
Carriagcway Livc Load
Parmeters
Lsft Sidc Span (C/Cof Exp. Gap) " m e m
Mi Side Span (t/C of Exp. Gap)
-. Irf) Sde Dirt. Be-n Exp 6ap 8 Bearing
zsw m
m
Right Slde Dist. &tween Exp 6ap 6 Bearing - m
Left Sidr Span (WC of k i n g ) - Zrsu m
R i i Side Span (C/Cof Beanng) - 22 81? m
The span on either side of the pier is 35.0 m PSC T - Girder
The line sketch for the spans and the pier is shown below.
Tht ~ p p ShPH
n tmomm&te the full train of live had.
The reaction at C is given by R1
The longitudiml eccentricity of the span - 1.10 m
-
The braking force is calculated as per Cl:214.2 of IRC:6 2000.
H e m Breking bnce = 20 O
h of the first train load.
The span is of enough length to acwmmodate the full train of Live Load.
The Braking Force is given beow:

- .I
Tater Load on me span = 1000 kn
Total Braking Fone - 200.0 kn
Braking F a r on one pler - 400.0 kn
i 1.m
The ruution at C is given by R1
R1 z 554 x 14.81 / 22.8 kn
The longitudinaleccentricity o f the span -- 1.10 m
- 395.84 kn m-
9 Bmkina Force
-
The braking force is calculated as per Cb214.2 of 1RC:6 2000.
Hence Braking force = 20 %of the first train load.
Total Span Length - 25.00 m

(CCd Ewp ff.)
The span is of enough length to accommodab the full train of Live Load.
The Braking Force is given below:
The Braking Force is given below:
LASA
PIER-DESIGW MOM
Flyovsr at Karur Deaign of Pibr for Wwr
Maximum Reretion Clsc

5mma
M Slde Span (CIC of Exp.Gap)
night Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap)
MSldeDist.BawecnFXpGap&&ving
*-a%' Right S i e Dist. EWwem Exp Gap & Bearing
laSidc Spen (CIC of Baring)
RigLt Side S p n (CKof BePring)
To fmd the maximum R d w we place the train of loads in such a way that
CG of the load system is at the center line of the pier.
Maximum Reaction
R1 = 490~(22.8-(2.66+0.67-1.1))1(2.8)Im
RI + R2 - 917.6 kn
Longitudinal Moment (RZ-Rl)* l .l - 36.8 Lorn
Flyover at Karur W i n of Pier for Wver
Maximum Reaction
RI - 282 x ( 22.8 - ( 1.44 +3.38 - 1.1 ) f 1 (22.8) kn
Total Reaction is R l +
R1+ R2 = 235.99 + 220.47 kn
For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall get doubled of that of Class A 1 Lane.
R 1 + R2 = 2 x 456.46
Design of P ifor ffyolrsr
RACTtON DUE TO DL
15
.......... , , . . . . .c. . . . . . . ' ." ,.' 3. S. . .
-.........2.5-....................................................................
L C . , 21595 ;
2
1 8.. :.
--..---..-- 2 a !LP?.sP.-j
i,..- .......
3 m
R . .
: .-..,-.--
.
Z .
i a...--..L-..?;l:W .-.- i
j
!
...-. 41 ....-... A- .-.-,.. 2 .-".* i--.... 0......-..i 215.96
'
.C
.I ...... ..-.I
i
i S L2 t -.-.-.- 0 i 215.333
Total D l re&ion = 376.874
Total SIDL rasdion on Par = 105.952 Tonne
fatal krd for pkr desitgn = 482.826

Hatf load = 241.413
DL in one span conatrucbd cam 188.437 Tonne
Flyover at Karur Design of Pier for ROB
Desim of Pier & Pier foundation

Input data:-
Finished Road Level FRL - -
Bed level BL - -
Foundation top level - -
Bearing Level - -
$uDerslnrcturs Data:-
Construction of New bridge (1) or widening (0) ? 1 (enter 1 if new construction, 0 O widening)
Superelevation -- 2.50 %
Right Span of the bndge - 22.80
Span c/c of piers - 25.00
Left Span of the bridge - 22.80 m
Span c/c of piers - 25.00 m
Width of carriageway - 8.75 m
Overall width of Superstrvctutw = 9.750 m
Wdth of crash barrier - 0.50 m
Width of safety kerbhotpath -- 0.00 m
Faotpath/Safety kerf,is provided on - 0 srde
Thickness of safety k e m f p a t h - 0.00 m
Live loed considered on FP+Keh - 500 Kg/m2
m Overall Depth of PSC girder -- 2.100 m
+' Constantsr-
Den* of concrete - 2.5 ~/m
Weight of wearing coat -
- 0.2 ~/m
Grade of Concrete (substtucture) =M 30 MPa.
Grade of Concrete kuperstructure) =M 40 MPa.
DATA FOR PIER DESIGN:-

Overall Heigth of Subshrctum - mm (Pier capfpedesfal top to pile cap top)
Dia of Pier - mm
Die of Pier - mm
Pier Cap Width in Long Dirn. - mm
Pier Cap Length in Trans Dirn. - mm 17.00
Sfmight Depth of Pier Cap - rnrn
Varying Depth of Pier Cap - mm
Size of bearing (Etas. brg assumed size) = x 530 x 90 x 3 Nos
Size of Pedestals (if bearing is provided) = x 830 x 250 x 3 Nos
Dia of Pier - mm
Dia of Pier - mm
Total straighf Height of Pier - mm
Inout loads from summtrutture for Pier (LL on one span)

25.00 M 25.00 M
ma# Laad or Su-m InCwnQSlDL
Class A 1 Train
Class A 2 Train
Class 70R wheel 7 Train
Class 70R Tracked 1 Train
Live toed Max Reaction
Live loed Min Reaction
Braking force
- -
PIER-DESIGNIINPUT-DATA LASA
Typical design calculations for RCC Pier

JHeiahtof pier = 10.580
Analvsis & Corn~ufation
of Loads:-
Desian Data for Su~ersfrycture:-
C/C Distance bet" Bearings = 22.80 m
C/C Distance betn Piers = 25.00 m
Camageway Width = 8.75 m
Overall Mlidth of Deck. = 9.75 m
Overall Depth of supershctum = 2.100 m
Desian Data for Pier :-
O v e n Helgth
~ of Substructum = 10580 mm (Bed Block top to Faating Bottom)
Dia of Pier = 2006 mm
Dia of Pier = Zoo0 mm
Pier Cap W m m Long Dirn. = 3400 mm
Pier Cap Length in Trans Dirn. = 7300 mm
Straight Depth of Pier Cap = 500 mm
Varying Depth of Pier Cap = 750 mm
Length of Pedestals = 700 x 830 x 250
Distance betn Pedestals = 3000 mm x Nos 3
Size of Bearings ( mm) = 400 x 530 x 90
Dia of Pier = 2000 mm
Dia of Pier = 2000 rnm (cut water to ease wakd
e Grade of Concmte = 30 Wmm2 Allow- ten 67 Allow co 1~WOT/m2
L Total Height of Pier = 8990 mm
Radius of cut water/ ease water = loo0 mm
Density of Concrete = 2.50 T/m"
Free board = 6.253 m
References.
I.R.C :-6 - 2000 - ~ o a d s8 Stresses. 1 25.00
- -
l.R.C :-21 2000 Pennissibk Stresses
C --
h
CalculatSon of Dead Load from S u ~ e Structure

r :-
25.00 25-00
Dead Load of supefSt~ctumon/! = 184.0 T 184.00 T
Kerb on LHS = ,>{I,. T 0.00 T
FP + railins/crashbenier loading = 17.50 T 17.50 T @ O.TTlm forpash barrier
FP LL of 590 kgm2 0.00 T
Max reaction from Vehicular Laad
Braking force -
, .
Flyover at Karur Design of P e r for flyover
A)
From Pedesf2ils (if anY)
Volume of 1 Pedestal = 0.7 x 0.83 % 0.25
= 0.14525 m 3
No: of Pedesfal = 3 x 2 - 6 Nos
.: Total Volume = 0.14525 x 6 = 0.8715 m3
.: Total Load = 0.8715 x 2.50 = 2.1788 T
From Circular Pier :-

Die. Of pier -- .2.00 m
Height of Pier - 8.99 m Totel Area of st portion - 3.14 m2
.: Total Volume
.: Total Load
-
FM Bed Block / Piel CQ
- 0.5 x
Area inelevation
.: Total Volume
.: Dead Loed
mans Fw desfminuPier
1 m x D L + L L on o m smn*L CVL+&&nQ -
2 Max ClL+LL on one snav+LWL+wfnd+B~rim.
3 /ray l;)L*U on 010 s p ~ n + L W L + E Q + B ~ a n n q
4 ~~ofonesrxln
5 DL of one sm+wind
6 DL of one w n + E Q
Bdina dbc?
Braking Lo&
For Ela~torne~cBeannu:- Fh Applied horizental fom

I== FhR+vr.Ltc
Vr Shear rating of ElastomeriC bearings
0.2 mm/meter of span
Lic Movement of deck above beadng other man that due to applied
0.8 mm /m of spen
For 25.00 m of span
4
,-
4-.
vr.Ltc - 6.00 tonnes
rn For 25.00 m of span
vr.Ltc
-- 6.00 tonnes
F =FN2 + Vr.Ltc
FO~ 25 mofspan F =FhR + Vr,Ltc - 16 tonnes
For 25 mof span F =Fm + Vr.Uc = 16 fonnes
Horizontal loed wnsidemd 16.00 T

moment ebout base of Pietfhb 11.0 176.7 Tm
PIER-DESIGNIDesign of Pier
Cenfrifuqral force:
The centrifugal force shall be detrmined h m the following equation (IRC-6:2000, clause-215)
C - - W v2
127 R
Where C = Centrifugal force
W - Load in tons
- 91.8 t
v - Design speed of vehicles
- 0.0 KMPH
R - Radius of curvature in meters
- SM.b m
C - 0.00 t
CentMugalf~me = 0.00 t Distributed on Two pian
per pier
Eccentricity of Centrifugal force -- -

Deck top Level +l.2O Pile cap top level
- 13.88 m
Centrifugal Moment a 0.00 fm
Live Load Eccentn'citv Trans. ecc Load Moment FP side

This ecc is opposite to the FP ecc.
Live Load Eccentricitv Lonq. em Load Moment Load on longer Span only
2 span* LL One span laid
Check for wind load (IRC 6: el. 212.3) (Wind is taken on longer span for simplicrty)
Height of deck from mid pier 4.50 m
Height of deck pier base 7.30 m
8) Exposed area of deck and railings
- 2600 htx 25000 length
- 65 m2
avg ht above bed level -
, ,>
-- 7.3 m
min pmssure = . ., 1 , . 2.40 KMm2 (IRC 6: c1.212.3)
fom =
-.
- .
,-*
-7
'.,
15.6 T
Momemat~ ' r - 6 e s e,,
#.
,'j
', ~.,
-
'--.
-7
113.9 Tm
\-:, , J ,,: ;: 1
I .;1 ' .J>> :<
.
. ., '
%
. -..;,:,:--
.. ..
u.../-:.
/+- .-;
-, hp(' - --
-.----
i -.
1 LaSA
of Pier
pl~~-CjESlGNlOe~ign t
Area of Pier Cap

Re& 3400 x 500 - 1.7 m2
mln pressure = 2.40 KWm2 (IRC 6: c1.212.3)
Total Wind F m 0.41 T
Moment at pier base 4.1 Tm
Tri= 2700 x 750 -- 2.025 m2

mm pmssum = 2.40 KMn2 (IRC 6: c1.212.3)
Total Mlind Force 0.49 T
Pier Shan
-
- 8990 x 2000 = 17.98
mm pressure = 2.40 KWm2 (IRC 6: c1.212.3)
Total Wind F o m 4.32 T
Total Wind Force 20.8 T

Total Mnd Moment at pier bot 142.2 Tm
Wnd against moving load (Class A train) class A 20.3 m

Lengih of Class A train 20.3 m class 701 15.2 m
Wndpmssum = T/m IRC 6: c1.2 12.3
Force -- 0.3
6.1 T
Moment at base = 53.6 Tm (Wind on LL at 1.5 m ebove deck level)
Minimum wind laad (with LL)
Min. pressure -- Q45 T/m
-- 25.0 m
length
Force -- 11.3 T
Moment et base = 82.2 Tm
Maximum wind moments. (with LL) 1 span laid
Design Moment at mid ht of pier 178.67 Tm 0.00
Design Moment at pier base 195.76 Tm 85.19 tm
Design Moment at pier base 195.8 Tm 85.2 Tm
(Seismic Zone 111)
.- L
..
Factor = 0.06
Bearina Level = 505.1793 m
seismic times at pile cap level
one constructed case

Total H or Load = 32.2 T 30.09 T
Total H or Moment = 326.0 tm 180.81 Trn
- -
LASA
PIER-DESIGNIDesign of Pier
Design of Pier for flyover
1 Max DL+LL on one s~an+BearinaBraking

Check for stress in Pier
Design Axial load

Design Moment (tr)
Design Moment (long)
axial Mtr Mlong

Total Loads 628.2 325.2 277.7
2 Max DL+LL on one span4Bearina Wraking+Wind

Cheek tar stress in Pier
I I I Load I ecc I Moment
Pier M a d Load 1 133.4 1 0 3 1 D O Design Axial load
Super Structuretoad 403 0 00 Design Moment (tr)
Llva Coal 41 8 1.1 100 9 Design Moment (long)
?earl
1
no -
' 5 0- 11 0 - 17G7 -
V i ~ n dforce 195 8
IDL+LL ecc In Transverse Dim. 1 325.2 1
$ selsrnrc F o G 5 (Hnr-long) 1
axial Mtr Mlorm
Total Loads 628 2 521.0 277.7
3 Max DL+LL on one span+Bear)naIBrakinp+Eq (LL is 50%)

Check lor stress in Pier
Design Axlal load

Design Moment (tr)
axla! Mtr Mlong

Total Loads 582.3 325.2 553 2
4 DLof OneSwn
- Check for sbesa In Pler
I I Load em Moment
Phr Dexl Load 1334 00 00 Design Axlal load
Super StructureLoad 201 5 245 7 Design Moment (tr)
C . Z - - "' . I , 1.1
axtal Mlr Mlona

Total Loads 334.9 kW.0 422.5
5 DL of One S ~ a n
+wind
C k k for rtress in Pler
Design Axial load

Design Moment (W)
axial Mtr MIona

Total Loads
F I y m at Karur Design of Pier for flyover
8 DL of One S ~ a +EQ
n
Check for atmcs In Pler
Pler Deed Load Design Axial load

245.7 Design Moment (tr)
Llvs Load h i g n Moment (long)
I10
1
DL+LL ecc in Transverse Dim. 80 9
'~ersrn~cjr~or-long)1 30.1 180.8
ax1a1 Mtr Mlong
Total Loads 334 9 80.9 426 5
LASA
Desian of Pier cap
A
I A - . - .
/ -.. -!.................................. -.,-,-.-.-.-.-.--. * ...- -......-

___+ 2000 !
1 2650 48
+ 2000 ---+ - 2650
&meter
A) Design of Cantilever Portion in the Transverse Diiecti(m.
U S area of Bed Block/m = 2.319 m 2 (Transwrse View)
Cantilevered Length = 2.650 m
Volume = 2.319 x 3.40 - 7.88 m 3
Net Volune = 7.88 m3 -
Dead load = 7.88 x 2.50 = 19.71 T
C.G of Load = 1,74 m
-PPCt mengp.rt
Load Moment at face of Pier
0. = 74.92 + 7.46
= 22.38 Tm
Load due to ecc of FP and kert) load= 161.875 Tm/ 36 = 13-T
n DL+SIDL reaction MI beering = f34.33 T (reaction from hu spans)
Net supershudre &ion = 134.33 + 13.49 = 161.31 T
. %
Moment at pier face = 161.31 x 2.00 = 322.63 Tm
Dired bearing Due to Trans M m t

Liveload on bearing =( 30.59 T + 4.54 T ) x I. 133333 (impad for 70R)
C.G of Live Load = 2.000 m
Live load moment = 79.62 Tm
Z Mortt8t?b = 424.62 Tm
Net Tmihm in Pier cap = 0 Tm Maximum

~ Moment
i . = ~ / 1 . 7 1+dh)
1
0.0 x ( 1 + 1168.0
1.7 3406.0
0.00 Tm
Design Moment = 424.62 + 000 = 424.62 Tm
pennissibible ShesseS vide /=:21- 2004

concrete is of grede M 30.00
a& = 100 ~ g / ~ m ~
a st = 2000 ~ ~ / c m '
Modular Ratio , m = 10
n n = 0.33
i = 0.89
Q = 14.8f
clear Cover 50 mm
Effectrve Depth Reqd "deff
Bar Dia 32 rnrn
deff reqd: ,r 1OOOOO
340
= 91.82 CinS c 116.8 ems 0.K
= 725 - 5 - 3.2 = 116.80 a?lS
deff pmvided
Ast reqd = -
M
ost x l x d
. . Ast regd = 424.62 x l d w = ZO&4S6Crn2
D2000.00 x 99 x 116.W
AS1
NO of bars Repd: -
= 8.0425 Crn2
= 204.496
8.0425
= Nos m
Spacing of Bers = -
340 - 13.1
-m s
26
SO provide 32 mm dia bars. 130 mm cfc spacing
Ast Provided
--
LASA
Design of Pier for flyover
Check fof S h w st d M fnun pier fcce.

Load CG from CL of pier= 1500 mm
Defffrwn pier face + pier width12 = 2168 mm
Hence, at deff from pier face the live load shear will not be there.
Load beyond deff of the per is assumed to be prqportronal to the pedestal

part lyrng beyond Deff
Width of pedestal 830 mm
Pedestal portion beyond Deff 1247 mm
LL Supstr Rwn
1 750, Tdal Applied load 39.81 + 134 = 174 f
Proportion of applred loads 174.1 x ,900 = 188 8
830
. - . .I
i 2000
2650
-
I CL OF PIER DL of Canti!eeverbeyond deff
6.3 +
Total Shear at Deff from Pier

i.6 x 0.0=
--
=
2.6 =
0.00 T
1978 T
Shear due to Torsion
3.4
Total Shear =197.77 + 0.00 = 197.77 T

Shear stress. r = V Vide cl - 304.7.1.1 of I.R.C:-21-2000 1
6; d
V = The design shear across the section
d = Effective depth of the section at deff= 919.4215 mm
B = Breadth of slab
. .r = 1978 x f 0000 = 0.63 ~ m m "
3400 r 97g.12
Maximum Permiw'bkt Shear Stress :- ( '
b = 3400 mm
rmax = 2.2 wmm2

= V/bd = 0.633 > 0.31 mrn2 Sheer mint?. reqd
-- 0.633 c 2.2 m m z SAFE
Vsteel ~-~c*b*d=
= 100.9 T Sheer reinff. Reqd.
Spacing = U X X A ~ ~ X ~
vst
Assuming 4 legged 1 Z Z dia StrstrmpS
A sv = 452.16 mm
usc = 200 m m 2
Spacing of stirrups
- 824.4 mm
Provide 4 legged 1 dia stimps at
PIER-DESIGNIPier Cap
Design of Piir for byavn
Flyover at KINr
[h*
, ,- . .
of Open Foundation 1 sc*mkrorr.m
0 F d a t i m Dimension
-.arn
B(y)=
Bc=
I.w rn
;,:,7? m
r P i u Lead L k t ~
P =
k =4 -
b -k -
( a t Top of Fodoiion)
-23 kN
3212.13 kNm
-1.a kNm
Hr- 0 kN
Y - 481.8!J1 k N
b l m n face t o s t o r t ~ qof slopp~ngin X dirrction

Colmn face to s t d i q of slopping in Y dwection
A* Effcct~wbw
A v q l c EffeCt~u&pth d :
- 0 095 m
I755 rn Ck.tkkXXIln
OI
6rwr b ~ q R L a u n =
Gross @enr~ng Ressure - 382.213 W m f
573.32 M m 2 PcfibirqnOmnr
sealrbngwl
Motrrklr Lkcd tkckhvy*
6r.L uf bnntr ; 13- flq Shw
&a& Steel = Rend,- m

-
R: 5trel tn ohrg 0
C k c l r )a na r-, Qi
t
-
J'
k=
A * v a g r Cherburdcn Pressure:
+ 63.0 W/m2
;y
C.8 2m
-Rrcnre
PIA : 1701 kN/m2 pl = P/r\ - M d Z r . &/z= M8 k~/m'
MdZr: 35 4 k ~ / m ' p2 = PIA MTIZ,. ML/& = 130.6 kN/mZ
I&/& = 69 9 k ~ / m ' pa = P/A M T ~ Z TY / 4= , -- 2n.4 k ~ / d

-
pa :PIA M r l Z r + &I4 = 204.6 w/m2
PIER-DESIGNKJpan Fwndabon
h?- fm:
M*rwW.l)(l#
Pt
R= I5U.7 Ma'
Pa' wo w m '
U=I 2m v
USA
Design of Pbr lw Wa
This ssctionof tk fmtirq at ssc X1X2 will be t q e z o i d d . Its lnmurt of

d cDmidainJ n to bc o e a q k of e f f d i e
r d s t a u a n b.c a l ~ l l o t hy
w ~ d t h8'.
d = t-&-bV8 : 3038 m
R= 1.481 N/m2
d*: ( M I R ~ =' ~ 11m nun
Eff cew= 105 mm OY
1745 mm
hvhm
1
~:
(p3*fln/2=
h= 1345m
283.4 W m I
,,,,, +..------------.- kt-
A2 =
Vol =[A1 .
(pX3. pX4)%/2 ;
A2 + s q r t ( A l A Z ) W =
260.2 kN/m
365.4 kN
v'. 365.4 k N
M= 242.2 lcNrn
0'. 1.279 m @cpm d racrirn at v3V4)
d= 1.184 m (Eff bcpth o f sertiand Y3Y41
bl = 5.510 m
b2=
tm 8 = 0.356
LCW o ~ I ~ ~ / ~ ~ ( A I + z * ~ ~ ~ A I A ~ ~ ~ A =Z ] / { A ~ ~ A ~ A Z ~ A ~ )
v' = 3 2 5 5 685752 kN (Vol of pr. Oiagrrm)
M= 4870 597063 kNm
Tki. Mion of tks footing at s u XlXZ will b8 tmpzZoi&l. Its momtnl of

mnmc.em be dubtsd & &irg it t o bo h a q k of eff-
wdth 8'.
8'. b&-bye= 3.038 m

1.481 Wmmz
-
R=
A. = 15521 mmz
d-= (M!R~Y= 1041 rnnr
Eff cow3 85 m n OK Bar d~o= 1 0 mm
dm= 1765 nun 5pac1q = UIT mm

A, prondrd= 2~ mmz OU
A, Mln= 17368 mm2
R o v ~ d s120 @ 12% r/c Alwg XX dlnctnrn
in W d~mctim =
do in X* direcfii =
LC'=
g
A m=
.
sc' =
2yec' + LC/] =
Min A w ;
PIER-DESIGN- Feu-
Design of superstructure
CALCULAflON OF DEAD LOAD OF SUPERSTRUCTURE

UnttWt. Weight
No. D
KN
1.0 Welght of Beams (uniform portion at Span)
2.0 Welght of Beams (varying portion)
3.0 Weight of Beams (uniform portion at Support)
4.0 Weight of Deck Slab (dc of Brg.)
5.0 Weight of Deck Slab (Cantilever overhang portion)
6.0 Welght of Draln
7.0 Weight of wearing coat (cJc of Brg.)
8.0 Weight of Crash Barrier
9.0 Weight of Kerb
10.0 Weight of Intermediate Cross Glrder
11.0 Weight of End Cross Girder
rn Total weight of (DL + SIDL) one Span 5855.0 KN

d Say 5855 KN
Number Bearing in one Span =
Load on one Bearing =
END CROSS GIRDER
The end cross girder Is design as a continuous deep beam for bearing replacement condin, oont[nuous over knife supports at
the Jack locations. The center line of the jack location are taken to be 650mm from the the center line of bearing. The reaction
of main girder due to (DL + SIDL) are applM as bad at the girder locatlon as shown below. The value of KFY Is adjusted In
such a wav that the reactiis in su~wrtsA.0.C.D.E and F are same.
Number Jack In one Span =

Load on one lack =
X-END-GIRDEWLoad Calculation LASA

F&werAt u r u r Qtury Design of Superstructure
DESIGN OF END CROSS GIRDER
f Maximum Hogging Moment (DL + SIDL) 0.0 KNm

Maximum Sagging Moment (DL+SIDL+PLL+LL) 64.6 KNm
Maximum Shear Force 732 KN
Permissible stress of Reinforcement 200 ~ / m m ~
Depth of Cross Girder 1.7 m
C/c distance between longitudinal girder 3.000 m
Width of Cross Girder 0.4 rn
Grade of Concrete 35 Mpa
1.0 Design as deep beam as per Clause 29, IS 456 - 2000
1.2 Genera/asper C% 29.1
Effective Span
Smaller of the following
(i) c/c distance bebveen support
(ii) 1.15 times the clear span
I -
- 2.990 m
D -- 1.7 m
110 -
- 1.759 > 2.5 (for continuous beam)
Hence as per Clause 29.1 of IS 456 - 2000 the component shall not be design as deep beam.
1.2 Lever Ann
Lever Ann jd =
,-3-
1.3 &/w/ation of R e r h m e n t
rn
Rein-t
1.3.1PaslPasltive
Required Ast = M / (a, * jd) -- 241 mm'
Minimum Reinforcement required = 0.2/100 * 400 * 1700 -- 1360 mm2
Reinforcement required
Provide 4 nos 20 $ + 1 nos 16 4
Provided Ast
- -
LASA
ff utawl&uR-
Y
Minimum Side Face reinforoement rquhed = 0.12/100 * 400 * 1700 * 0.6
-- 489.60 mm2
Reinforoement pmvidd - 2306 m2
[Rd:DesgrofmxGlrderkskadeet]
OK
L4.
m .
-
=,z Max.mbkshear - 1.7 wmmL

OK
t,= Permissible shear sbiess d come& , -- 0,298 wmL
- 0.222
Het~leShear ninb. Required
Provided spadng
11,= V, .s/05.d
Rwlde 2legged 16 4cUa bars Q 150 c/c

Design of Superstructure
DESIGN OF END CROSS GIRDER AS BRACKET
- Max vertical reaction V

Depth of Cross Girder h
-
-
732
1.7
KN
m
Width of Cross Girder b -- 0.4 rn
Grade of Concrete - 35 Mpa
Yeild stress of Reinforcement - 415 ~/mm>
2.0 Design of End Cross Girder as Bracket [Ref. "Concrete Bridge Practice: Analysis, Design
and Economics" By Dr. V.K. Raina]
a, -- 0.650 m
Effective depth d' - 1.6025 m
a, 1 d' - 0.406 m
<1
The cantilever portion of the beam shall be design as bracket
n
v, - 2223 mm'
= 0.85 f, p
- 415 NlmmL
fsy
F
- 1.4 [for Convete placed monolithiallyaaoss interface]
&=Maxof
(0(4 + A3 - 2849 mm'
(ill (2/3*& + A3 - 2104 ltIm'
(iii) (0.04 f,' / )f, *dl b -- 1730 mm'
Hence A, required
RsvWe 8 tms. 25 + + 8 nos. 20 0
-4
A,,=Maxof
L -
T-7 (i) 0.5*&
(ii) 1/3*&
Hence & requid -- 1113 m'
Provide 14 m. lO+ + 6 m. 16 4
-4 -- ~ 0 mm'
6
OK
So, provide 7 nos. of 10 mm db bars an both faces equally spaoed.
Provided A,
Design of Supemtructure
DESIGN OF END CROSS GIRDER
Maximum Hogging Moment (DL + SIDL) KNm

Maximum Sagging Moment (DL+SIDL+PLL+LL) KNm
Maximum Shear Force KN
Permissible stress of Reinfo~ement ~/rnm'
Depth of Cross Girder m
C/c distance between longitudinal girder m
Width of Cross Girder rn
Grade of Concrete MPa
1.0 Design as deep beam as per Clause 29, IS 456 2000 -

1.1 Genera/ as per CI, 29.1
Effective Span
(i) c/c distance between support
I - 2.990 m
D - 1.7 m
I/D -- 1.759 > 2.5 (for continuous beam)
-
Hence as per Clause 29.1 of I S 456 2000 the component shall not be design as deep beam.
Lever Arm jd =
1
1.3 Calculatr'onof Reihikcement

h
Required Ast = M / (a, * jd)

Minimum Reinforcement required =
Reinfo~ementrequired
Provide 4 nos 20 4 + 1 nos 16 4
Provided Ast
X -END-GIRDER/DeepBeam
d
jd
i
,
Required Ast = M / (a, * jd)
Minimum Mnfarcement required =
wnforcementrequired
-*no.-
x 4
Mlnimum Slde Face reinforcement required = 0.12/100*400*1700*0.6
- 489.60 mm2
Reinforoement pravided -- 2306 mm2
[Ref:~dEr~dX~asbadretl
OK
l.4--
T ~ =Max.pemriSSlbleshear
-- 1.7 N/mm2
OK
fc= Permissfbleshear stress of amek -- 0.298 ~/mm'
- 0.222
Henae Shear rebif. Required
Provided spacing
A, = V, .s/q.d
Provide 2 legged 16 +dia bars6 150 Jc

DESIGN OF END CROSS GlRDER AS BRACKET
Max vertical reaction V -- 732 KN

Depth of Cross Girder h - 1.7 m
W i i of Cross Girder b - 0.4 m
Grade of Concrete -- 35 Mpa
Yeikl stress of Reinforcement - 415 ~/rnrn'
2.0 Design of End Cross Girder as Bracket [Ref. "Concrete Bridge Practice: Analysis, Design
and Economics" By Dr. V.K. Raina]
a,
- 0.650 m
Effective depth d' - 1.6025 m
a, 1 d' - 0.406 m
<1
n The cantilever portion of the beam shall be design as bracket
fw
- 415 WmmL
P
-- 1.4 [for Concrete placed rnodithically acroa interface]
- -
LASA
&=Max&
(1) (4 + P3
(ii) (2/3*& + 4)
(iii) (0.04 f,' / f,) *dmb
8 nos. 20 $
- 6446 mm'
OK
A,,=Maxob
n (i) 0.5*Af
w (ii) 1/3*&
Provide 14 m. 10 0 + 6 nos. 16 4
- 2306 nun'
-4
OK
So, provide 7 nos. of 10 mm dia bars on both faces equally spaoed.
CFbovefJt ?@fur Design of Superstructure
DESIGN OF INTERMEDIATE CROSS GIRDER
Maximum Hogging Moment KNm

Maximum Sagging Moment KNm
Maximum Shear Force KN
Permissible stress of Reinforcement ~ / m m ~
Depth of Cross Girder m
CJc distance between longitudinal girder m
Width of Cross Girder m
Grade of Concrete MP~
1.0 Design as deep beam as per Clause 29, IS 456 2000 -
Effective Span
(i) C/C distance between support
I - 3.000 m
D -
- 1.7 rn
I/D
- - 1.765 < 2.5 (for continuous beam)
Hence as per Clause 29.1 of I S 456 - 2000 the component shall be design as deep beam.
Lever Arm Z = 0.2 * (I + 1.5*0) -

- 1.11 m
1.3 Cshthtkm ofReintb.tzement asper CL 29.3
2.3.1 Positive Reinibmement as per Cl, 29.3.3

1
Required Ast = M / a* * Z
h
Minimum Reinforcement required = 0.2/100 * 300 * 1700 = 1020 mm2
Reinforcement required -- 1020 mm2
Provide 3 nos 20 + + 2 nos 16 4
Provided Ast -- 1345 mm2

OK
Reinforcement shall be placed at the bottom within a-depth of (0.25 D - 0.05 1)
- - 0.275 m
:: .
Development length = 0.8*b
4
X-INT-GIRDER/Design LASA
FCyoverJt mrur Qtary Design of Srcperssiucture
4) = nominal diameter of the bar. -

- 20 mm
=st = stress in bar. -
- 200 ~ / m m ~
TM = design bond stress as given in 26.2.1.1 in IS:-456 - 2000
- 1.7 bl/mrn2
For deformed bar the value of r shall be increased by 60 010. - 2.72 hl/mrn2
b - 367.6 rnm
0.8*b - 294 mm
Length of embedment beyound the face of each support - 300 rnm
1.3.2 Negah'ye Reyntb.m?mentasper C/.29.3.2
Required Ast = M / a, *Z - 2152 mmL
Minimum Reinforcement required = 0.2/100* 300 * 1700 = 1020 mm2

n
2 Reinforcement required - 2152 mm2
Distribution of Reinforcement
The distribution reinforcement over the support of a deep beam is placed in two zones
ZQna
It is the zone of depth "0.2 * D" ,adjacent to the tension face,and contains a proportion of the
tensile steel given by
0.5 * ( I / D - 0.5 ) - 0.63
where, 1 = clear span

D = o v e d depth
A, required in Zone I - 1360.7 mm2

5
Provide 3 nos 20 0 + 3 nos 16 4

A
Provided Ast - 1546 mm2
OK
Reinforcement shall be placed at the top within a depth of (0.2D) - 0.34 m
zm!cu
It is the zone measuring "0.3 D" on either side of the mid depth of the beam, which shall contain the
remainder of the tension steel evenly distributed.
A, required in Zone I1 - 791.1 mrn2
Provide 6 nos 10 I$ + lm 16 4
on each face
%
Provided Ast - 1345 mm2

OK
Reinforcement shall be placed in the middle of (0.3D * 2) - 1.02 m

Minimrrn SIQ Face required = O.ly100 * 300 * 1700 * 0.6
r ,
= Max. pennisslble shear - 1.7 N/mmL
OK
'Tc= PennissiMesheardnssofamrete - O.ZS9 N/mZ
LLnr arm =LA = h / 4 . ( A l ~ P q r t ( A l A 2 ~ 3 A 2 ) / { A I * q r t ( A l A 2 ~ A 2 ) 2)
v': 2 6 4 6 . 6 W 161
M= ~ 7 9 8 . n 4 w 4kNm
gset X W will bc m o . & l . Its m

Thig sxtim of the f d ~at m of
ruistmce cun be mlcubtcd by carsidering it to be o m k of effective
4 wldth 8'.
4. =
L - 8.1 m
14291 mm'
Bar d l 6 a mrn
Spcclrrg = mm
A, pmvidcd; rnmz OK
4. Min; mmz
Prov~dcT20 @ lXNnm Alng W d~rectim
[almd-.I*-W
Ovcrhorg;
Al: (p3*p4pu2=
h: 1.545 m
202.2 W l m
--t
--;
I +
hr
1
p3 r 151.3 pz= m9
i+T
A2 = (pX3 + pX4).LIP =
Vol :[A1 + A2 + qflAIAZ)~h/3 =
183.3 W/m
297.7 kN
lnw cm = L A . = h / 4 * ( A l r T ~ A I A 2 ~ 3 A 2 ) I ( A l * r p ~ A l A Z p A 2= )
pY3= 141.9
0.760m
B.l l m
+
pY4 = 4 S
b'= 297.7 k N
M= 226.2 M -
V=U' m/dgta@= 242.5 W
u(F--
0' ; 1.226 m (D@ af sectla at V3Y4) t, = vlbld' = D.M3 ~/rnm'
n b:
bl =
1.131 m (Eff brpth of sectionat VW4)
5.010 m
r,= 0225 Wmr' Ow
-,
u K-
tong= 0.276
r* -&
Dwhwg=
A1 : (p3 p4YV2 =
h= 3.05 m
r r t l ~ YlWr
818.9 W m
l
& p3T-{; .-
pVl = 1327
-.---
4-
+
A2 = ($43 * p X 4 Y U 2 = b68.1 M m pY2 I 3...3
Vol of p.da:[Al A2 qrt(AlAt)rh/3 = 2263.9 kN LI.1
M:
z
~ W V ( A l + r ~ A W ~ 3 ~ I ( A l ~ A I A= 2 ) . A ~
2263 887466 kN (Vol d pr. Dugrat)
3335 542667 kNm kOc*TO b
Thhs section o t the tooting a t Sez X W will be rrapczo163I It5 morncm ot
ruishmcc cm k mku!utrdby corsiderlngu t to be a rcctangk of effective
- 1.473 m
23 n --+-
width 8'.
'6 = bqL-bV8 = 3.025 m B= 81 m

R: 1.481 N..rrm2
d4=
Eff m w -
(M/RB'~= 863 MI
85 mm d
A. z
hdia; w
12B3 mz
m
- X dp= 1515 mm
*.
Spcirq =
A,
pwridd:
M~nz
tilo
1 4 ~m2
3
W
m
14726 mm2
a
Provide R 0 8 lYkun c/c Along XX d~rrctim
& . & , m - ~ , , ~
Doin XX d i d i o n = 1.434 m
do an XX direction = 1.339 m
LC'. 3.535 m
sc' : 3 . 1 ~ m5
4= ~ [ d
LC'].: 14420 m
A- = 19.573 m2
Do inYY d i m i o n :
4 m XX direction =
LC' :
ec'.
b. ~[sc'+Lc']:
Arm =
Min A m = 19.673 m2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The 25.OM PSC T-Girder with cast-in-situ deck slab have been adopted for three
Flyovers Chainages (298+300) at NH-7 Clane Proposed carriageway with 3x25.0m span
arrangement having 3nos. Post-Tensioned PSC Girders @ 3.0m c/c The proposed span
arrangement has been provided as per smooth flow of traffic .
2.1 SPAN ARRANGEMENT, TOTAL LENGTH
No, of Spans
Span length (clc of exp. joints)
Span length (clc of bearing)
Total Length
2.2 GEOMETRY
Carriageway Width
Overall width
Width of Crash Barrier
Width of safety kerb
Cross slope 2.5% (Unidirectional)
Railings Crash Barrier
F 2.3 STRUCTURE TYPE WITH DIMENSIONS
SUPERSTRUCTURE
Superstructure PSC T Girder
Bearing Elastomeric pad type

Thickness of wearing course 65mm (40mm asphaltic wearing with
topping of 25mm mastic asphalt
Cantilever portion of Deck 1.875m
Depth of Superstructure including deck 2.10rn
CIC distance between main girders 3.00m
Distance between CIL of EJ to CIL of bearing 1.I

Om
Expansion Joint .. Strip seal t y b ,.

- -
DESION PHILOSOSHY mu DESIGN OF FLYOVERPSGT GRMR SUFERSTROCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
Type of Pier RCC single Circular pier
Type of Abutment R.C.Csingle Circular pier
FOUNDATION
Foundation
2.5 MATERIAL
Grade of Concrete for PSC Girder M40
Grade of Concrete for deck slab M35
Grade of Concrete for K C leveling course M15
Grade of Sbuchrral Steel S415
Type of Cables used for Prestressing 19T13 conforming toCL 2 of IS :
14268 ( lour reluxation strands ) with
bright metal seathing
Maximum size of aggregates to be used
Minimum Cement contents 31Okglm3 for PCC
380kgh3 for RCC
400kglm3 for PSC
Water cement ratio
0.45 for RCC
0.40 forPSC
Differential Shilnkage and Creep
Creep fadw = 0.43 .--

I .
EMBANKMENT
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR DESIGN OF FLYOVER PSC-T GIRDER SUPERSTRUCTURE
The Reinforced earth wall has been provided behind the abutment, Therefore no active earth
pressure acting on abutment
3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS
3.1 Codes 8 Standards
The design of various components of the Flyover, in general are based on provisions of
IRCIIS Codes. Wherever IRC code is silent, reference is made to other Indianllnternational
codes and standards. The list of IRC Codes (latest revisions) given below will serve as a
guide for the design of structures.
IRC: 5-1998 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,
Section I- General Features of Design.
IRC: 6-2000 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,
Section-ll - Loads and Stresses.
IRC: 21-2000 Standard Specifcatins and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,
Section-Ill - Cement Concrete.
IRC: 18-2000 Design Criteria for Prestressed Concrete Road Bridges ( Post
Tensioned Concrete ).
IRC: 782000 Design Criteria for Foundation & substructure for Road Bridges.
IRC: 83 (Part-Ill) Design Criteria for Bearings for Road Bridges
IS: 291 1 Design Criteria for Piles for Road Bridges
4. LOADING
4.1 Dead Load (DL)
Unit weight for Dead loads calculation shall be considered by adopting unit weights as per IRC:6-
2000.
m
4.2 Super Imposed Dead toad (SIDL)
Wearing coat
For calculation of load due to wearing, thickness of wearing coat 65mm has been taken.
Safety kerb
750 mm width of safety kerb and 250mm depth has taken for calculation of load due to safety
kerb.
Crash barrier
For calculation of weight of Crash barrier the cross sectional area af 0.361~12 has been
considered. /=-?:,-,,.-
)LC v-,
- I
1 i: . fi, I I
,-, 2 .'L , --- 4
p ,., " I
t,\w- ;,:*,/ - -
\I.-
DESlGN PHILOSOPHY FOR DESIGN OF FLYOVER PSC-T GIRDER SUPERSTRUCTURE
4.3 Live Load (LL)
Carriageway Live load
1 lane of Class 70R Wheel in combination with single lane of Class-A conforming to IRC 6-2000
has been considered in analysis and design for three lane carriageway.
Pedestrian live load of 500 Kg/m2shall be considered for safety kerb.
4.4 Temperature Loading ( femoerature Gradient )
The Climatic condition is assumed to be cc Moderate N. The tempereture variation of +/-

deg. Shall be considered. The temperature gradient to be considered is shown below.
Coefficient of thermal expansion is considered as 11.7x10*/~as per IRC: 6-2000.
Poisson's Ratio = 0.2 and Modulus of Elasticity is taken as per Table 9 of IRC: 21-2000.
i 4.5 Seismic Load
n As per IRC :6 - 2000 Project Corridor fall in Seismic zone Ill. For calculation of force due to
seismic the following parameters has been taken.
Zone factor 0.04 (Refer table 5 of IRC :6-2000)
Soil foundation factor 1.0 (Refer table 6 of IRC :6-2000)
Importance factor 1.5 (Refer Clause 222.5 of IRC :6-2000)
4.6 Centrifugal force
The force generated by Centrifugal action of moving vehicle caculated as. per IRC :6 -
2000.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR DESIGN OF FLYOER PSGT GIRDER SUPERSTRUCTURE
5.1 Method of Analysis for Longitudinal Girders
The analysis of the T - Girder for longitudinal flexure shall be carried out using grillage model on
STAAD Pro on the following basis:
o For the design of the longitudinal Sections, moments and shear force shall be determined
at an interval of every Ll8 and at d' effective from support.
o Members along the longitudinal Direction shall be along the longitudinal beam and at the
ends.
Transverse members of the grillage other than the cross - diaphragm shall be modelled
as slab elements.
5.2 Method of Analysis for Cross Diaphragm

n
The analysis of the Cross Diaphragm shall be carried out using grillage model on STAAD Pro on
-. the following basis:
o The intermediate cross diaphragm shall be designed as continuous beam supported on

the longitudinal girders.
a The end cross diaphragm also designed for the jack up condition.
5.3 Section Properties
The effective flange width calculation for determination of sectional properties for the longitudinal
and cross diaphragm shall be done in accordance with IRC: 21 2000
5.4 Method of analysis for deck slab

.. -d
The deck slab shall be designed as a continuous one way slab(- 1.Om width) supported on
n longitudinal girders with cantilever overhang beyond the girders. Live load effects shall be taken
based on effective width method.
6.0 Basic design Consideration relating to Pre stressing
It is proposed to use 19T13 cables conforming to Class 2 of IS14268 ( low relaxation

strands ) with galvanized sheathing for pre stressing.
Value of friction and webble coefficent ( p and k ) for pre stressing strands shall be
considered as v = 0.20 and k = 0.0030 (Refer Table -5 of IRC: 18-2000)
Relaxation loss shall be computed considering reluxation loss of 2.5% at 0.7 UTS
and 0% at 0.5 UTS for intermediate values, linear interpolation shall be done. (Refer
Table 4 A of IRC: 18-2000)
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR DESIGN OF FLYOVER PSGT GIRDER SUPERSTRUCTURE
Ultimate resistance of T-Girder in flexure shall be checked against yielding of steel
and against crushing of concrete as per cl -13 of IRC : 18-2000.
Maximum jack up pressure shall be considered at 85% of ultimate force.
For calculation of maximum shear stress as CI 14.1.5 of IRC-18-2000, depth db has

been taken as 0.8d or der which ever is greater.
Section cracked or uncracked in flexure has been decided on the basis of whether
the maximum ultimate capacity in shear is governed by the cracked or uncracked
capacity. Where uncracked capacity governs the relief due to prestressed force shall
be added to the shear capacity of the section obtained based on CL 14.1.5 of IRC :
18-2000.
The stress shall be checked for 20% higher time dependent losses like creep,
shrinkage, relaxation etc. as per CL 7.2.4 if IRC : 18-2000.
Duct diameter ( internal ) is considered as 90 mm. Clear cover protecting cable from
the nearest concrete surface is kept as 75 mm as per IRC : 18 - 2000.
6.1 Proposed Sequence of Prestressing
Cast the girder in situ in span either on staging or casting truss..
Prestress Stage I Cables after 14 days, after a concrete has attained a strength of
35 Mpa..
Position the beams on permanent bearings
Erect staging and shuttering for RC top slab supported from bottom bulb of girders.
Caste the top RC slab together with cross diaphragm.
Stress Stage 1I cables after 42days of Girder casting, after concrete has attained a
strength of 40 Mpa.
Caste the crash barrier on either side. - After 63 days
Lay wearing coat. - After 63 days
7.0 DURABILITY AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATION
7.1 Design for replacement of bearing
The end cross diaphragm shall be designed for the jack up position for replacement of
bearings.
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR DESGN OF FLYOVER PSGT GIRDER SUPERSTRUCTURE
7.2 Steel and Concrete cover
HYSD bars (Grade Fe 415) conforming to IS :I786 shall be provided. For pre stressing
19T13 cables conforming toCL 2 of IS : 14268 ( low reluxation strands ) with bright
metal seathing shall be used.
The minimum cover to reinforcement shall be determined from the recommendations

of IRC: 21-2000 taking into account the local environmental conditions. The increase in
detailed cover compared with the nominal cover as specified in the above code allows
for assessed variation in construction tolerance. Following clear cover shall be adopted
for various components:
Element Clear Cover to reinforcement

PSC Superstructure 50mm
Crash Barrier 50mm
7.3 Drainage Provisions
Drainage spouts shall be placed not greater than 6m center to centre. Down take pipes
will be provided to dispose the water below soffit of the super structure.
7.4 Expansion Joints
Strip seal type of expansion joint is proposed for PSC T-Girder type superstructure.
7.5 Emergency cable strands
In addition to design requirements, additional cables 1 strands symmetrically placed in

structure, capable of generating pre stressing force of about 4 % of total design pre
stressing force in the structure shall be provided. Only those cables which are required to
make up the defficiency shall be stressed and the remiender pulled out and the duct hole
shall be grouted.
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR SUB STRUCTURE & FOVNDATfON
This note pertains to the design of Sub-structure i.e. Pier, Pier Cap, Abutment Cap 4 Stem,
Dirt wall and Foundation (Pile).
For the design of Pier the vurious forces that are considered are as follows:
Dead Load from the Super-structure

Super-Imposed D a d Load from the Super-structure
Carriageway Live Load
Foot-Path Live Load (if any)
Seismic Load
Centrifugal force
Braking
The various load combinations are computed and STAAD Model also has been drawn and
analysis has been done. By using an In-house Excel Worksheet and the loads at pier base are
taken and design has been done.
For the design of Pier Cap it is checked f o r Corbel and Cantilever and accordigly designed
in an In-house Excel Worksheet.
The design of Abutment Cap 6 Stem, Dirt wall has also been designed in an In-house Excel
Worksheet.
For the design of pile Foundation, the load a t the top of pile Cap has been computed and
then by using In-house excel worksheet design has been done.
Flyover at Karur Design of superstructure
CABLE PROFILE :
Outer Girder
A Total of 3 cables of type 19K13 ( 19 strands of 12.7 rnrn nominal dia each ) and proposed as
1 Dummy cable are shown in attached cable profile.
-
In cable 2 and 3 all 19 strands are placed and stressed to a jacking force of 0.75 UTS.
In cable 1, 12 strands are placed and only 10 strands stressed to a jacking force of 0.75 UTS. In case of
emergency remaining cables can be stressed to 0.75 UTS, thus satisfying the requirement of 4% cables
for emergency as stipulated oin CL 22 of IRC 18.
Cables are proposed to be stressed in two stage.
Radius of circular curves at bends is maintained greeter than 10.6m thus satisfying the clause 20
of IRC 18. Which states that R should be >= 1.5+700'13( dia )I1000 = 10.6m. The minimum spacing of
cables is maintained 180 mrn, hence clear cover is more than diameter of duct.
CABLE VERTICAL PROFILE :
Span = 22.8 m End cross girder width 0.4 rn

Cable no :
ltern Unit 1 2 1 3 1 0 1 5
Coordinate at XI = rn 0 I 0 II 0 1 0 1 0
P
support y
P
,- rn 1. l 0.7 1 0.3 1.5 1.9
Coordinate at X2 = m 9.4 5.2 1 1 9.4 1E-04 1
end of curve y, = m 0.2 0.2 1 0.2 -
0.380 0.380
X = rn 1.2 1.2 [ 1.2 1.2 1.2
V = mrn 60 60 1 60 60 60
Coordinate at
start of cuwe
-=
y,
----
X3 = m
rn
10.6
0.14
6.4
0.14
2.2
0.74
10.6
0.32
1.200
0.32
Coordinate at
Curve Radious > 10.6. hence OK
FRICTION-INNER-FINALlCable arangernent LASA

Flyover rt Karur W i n of superstructure
1 I Cable no :
Ilclem 1 Unit 2 1 3
Coordinate at X2 = rn 7.6 3.4

L
middledcu~ z,= mm 0 -60 Slope > 6. hem^ OK
I Coordinate at x 3 =
skirtof &=
m
Jmm
]
1
I
8.2
120
1
1
1
4
-120 *
S l m 6. H.IICOW
I coordineteat
start of CU~W
&=
Lx
m
1 mm 1
9.4
180 1
5.2
-180 SW>6.-Ou
I
---A+-
--
I-Z~~~I~G'G
- -- -- : 3
--
cam-no*
-0-
, ---d
4.0 CHECK FOR ULTIMATE C A P A m IN FLEXURE A T VARIOUS SECIZONS

(Refer Clause 13.0of I R C : 18 - 2000)
Span Length (c/c of Brg.) = 22.0
MOMENT A T DIFFERENT SECKON
LOAOIN6S
d' away f m
U8 1 V4 3U8 V2
slpp#t 1 -
2m 2.B5m 5.7~1 8.- , 11.4m
a) Failure by Yielding of Steel (&A = 0.9*db*ASgf,
Location d' away from

U8 W4 3V8 W2
Suppofi
3730 1 4477 8977 9339
_I_/-
1.721 1.919 1.937
1670 1670 1670 1670
4. A r m of H~ghTens~leSteel (mm2)
------ A5 4737.6 4737.6 4737.6 4737.6 4737.6
5. UWmote Stmqth by p l d af
11963 12257 13309 136M 13792
stad (KN.m) wd+A
6. Wldth (effectwe) of web (m) b 0.65 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
7. Flange W ~ d t hof Tee (m)
6. Th~cknessof Fhnge of Tee beom
Bf
t
2.806 2.806 2 806 --
2 806
0 25
2.806
0.25
9. Vlt~motrStrength by CNshlng
-of C o n c h (KN.m)
(btL 36798 27594 30696 31767 32143
10. OLs~gnUlt. Strcngth (KN.m) % 11963 12257 13309 13648 13792
11. STATUS OK OK OK OK OK
LASA
F. Horizontal & Vertical Component of Prestress Force
Stage o f No. o f P, .cosO P,.cose. Yd Ps.sin9

section Cable No. YWd (m) 9 (drp)
Prestressing Cables (,) W-ml (KN)
1 0 5E-08 1.165 5.711 0.0 0.0 0.0

2 1 0.53 1.247 5.469 628.3 783.3 , 60.2
-
1
-
3
SUPPORT .
SECTION
1 D 5.26E-06 1.279 6.795 1 0.0 0.0 0.0
-
Total S t a a I I I
1
Y
4206.6 I
2UM.3 I
378.7
-,
-CG o f Tendons from bottom
Total Stage 2
- 1 I 1
0.4T75
628.3 1 783.3 1 60.2
I I CG of Tendons from bottom 1 1 1 .2466 1
2 1 0.526316 1.008 5.469 636.4 641.8 60.9362

1 2 1 0.427 5.492 2225.8 950.9 214.0172
1/8t h 1 3 1 0.140 0.000 2130.9 298.3 0
SPAN
SECTION
1 D
Total Stopc 1
- --
5.26E-06 0.983 6.795 0.0
435b.6
0.0
1249.2
4.95E-07
214.0
Total S t a p 2 I I I
C6 o f Tendons from bottom 1 0.4651
5.0 CHECK FOR SHEAR & TORSIONAL STRESSES A T VARIOUS SECTIONS

Perm. direct shear stress :Vt 4.7 Mpa (Table6 of IRC 18 - 2000)
Perm. shear stress :Vtu 4.75 Mpa -
(Table 7 of IRC 10 2000)
Total loss in Prestress KN
SHEAR A T DIFFERENT S C I l O N
1st Stage DL (KN) 208.5 183.6 118.8 61.2 0.0

2nd Stage DL (KN) 207.6 196.3 118.9 65.4 0.0
SIDL (KN) 91.1 126 110 64.2 45.4
k
PedestrianLL(KN) 0 0-
0 0 0
Carriageway U (KN) 349 310 235 235 155
V, = 1.25'DL + 2.QSIDL + 2.5*U

A. Check for Limiting Shew d d c r l n g 10%urtra shcor (As pcr CI. 14.1.5 of IRC: 18-2000)
w
1
Loccrtion d' m~
from U8 U4 3U8 U2 Remarks
Shear Forces Supwrt
1. Ultimate Shear, V, (KN) 1575 1502 1105 874 478
2. Effective Width, b (m) 0.59 0.415 0.24 0.24 0.24 b=(bw-213.4)
---
-
3. Depth , db(m)
4. r=V,/(b.db)/lOOO
.
(MPa)
Status
-- ----
1.680
159
OK
1.721
2.10
OK
1.869
2.46
OK
1.919
1.90
OK
1.937
1.03
OK
db= D - y d
B. Check for Ultimate Shear Capacity & Provision of Shear Reinforcefnent -
Lbwr~on d' away

from U8 U4 W 8 U2 Rernorks
Shear Fblrrs SPW -
1. Vltimetc Shear Camcity of W o n rmcrmckd in Flexure ((3. 14.1.2, IRC:18-200b)
a) Effectwe W~dth.b (m) 0 59 0.415 0.24 1 0.24 ' 0.24
b) Overall Depth. d (m) 2.1 2.1 2.1 1 2.1 21
c) Max~rnurnPr~ncrpalTens~leStress, f+ Ref. dl 14.1.2, IRC:18
1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52
= 0.24(f ck)' pa)
d) Hor~zontalComponent of p r e s t w s
4173.1 4278.3 4354.8 4449.4 4445.5
(KN)
e) Comp. Stress due to prestress, ,f
2-13 2.83 2.88 2.95 2'94
Prestmss force after
-,-----
f) Effect of Vert~calPrestress. V
,, all lasses considered
369.3 232.44 632.69 53.39 0.00
(KN)
g) Shear Capac~ty.V
,, = 818.7
-6-
(KN)
0.67"b.d.(f 1Z+0.8f~f+loS -
1631.9
--
1834.8
2204.1
1399.4 813.6 818.9
872.3 818.7
Ref. 1.0 of this note
FRICTION-INNER-FINAWu LASA
PGBI
Design d s u p e ~ d u m
(")NoMlrnrVlsd:
Yd (m] = Vrrtieal Ordimte of thbk frmsoffit of dcck
0 (dq) = h b t i v e arrgk of &viatiin in radian from jacking ud
P. = Forcc at the critical r r c t i o after
~ transfer (i,e after slip ot anchorage) (KN)
C. Force in Cables a t nodal points after Friction i Slip Losses

I
b
Component (*)
I Cable No. / 1 I 2
Nodal Points of the Cable
I 3 F 4 1 5
3
I Component (*)
I Cable No.
1 I 2
I 3 1 4 I 5
Nodal Po~ntsof the Cable

Component (*) Cable No. ,
1 2 3 4 5
cx (m) 0 .ooO 5.224 6.425 9.43 1 11.631

X0 (rad) 0.00000 0.00000 0.09586 0.33472 0.33472
Z= ( exp -
2 1.00000 0.97626 0.94789 0.88068 0.87181
P, = Po Z (KN) 2617.73 2555.57 2481.30 2305.
PX' 2202.14 2264.29 2338.56 2305.38 2282.16
.'
h
Nodal Points o f the Cable

Component (*) Cable No.
1 2 3 I 4 5
Ex (m) 0.000 9.466 9.526 10.740 11.740
ce (rad) 0.00000 0.00000 0.11859 0.70150 0.70150
Z, ( exp )-bze*k~x) D - ----
1.00000 0.95739 0.92916 0.79869 0.79503
P, = Po * Z (KN) - 0.01
1
0.01
0.79
0.01
0.80
0.01
0.80
0.01
0.80
1 px'
Span Length = 22.8

b. Force in Cable at chosen sections after Friction & Slip Lo-
Support 1/8th span 114th span 3/8th span
Cable No. Notation Mid span
Section section section sectlon
0 L,' 0.35 2.85 5.7 8.55 11.4
FRICTION-INNER-FINAUPZ
LASA
C ) Notations Used :
Zx (m) = Cumulative Length of Cable from jacking end in metres
18 (rad) = Cumulative angle of deviation in radian from jacking end
Po = Force a t Jacking end before transfer (KN)
P,= Force a t the nodal points before transfer (KN)
P: = Force a t the nodal points after transfer (KN)

=:L Cumulative Length of Cable from jacking end (in metres) a t various sections (m)
Pf = Force a t the critical sections before transfer (i,e before slip a t anchorage) (KN)
-
-
a
-
P. = Force a t the critical sections after transfer (i,e after slip a t o n c h ~ ~ K N )

'%\
E. Elongation
- Calculation -
Grip Lenqth 0.6 rn
-
---
1 2 3 4 5
Px 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IElongation (mm) 1 85.9
Elongation (mm) 80.8

Px 2617.73 2603.27 1 2537.99 2358.05 2289.64
Ex (m) 3 0.000 1.204 2.206 5.211 11.611
Elonaation fmm) 78.6
llonption (mm) I 1 82.1 J

Flyover at Karur Design of Superstructure
3.0 CALCVLAITONS FOR FRICITON AND SLIP LOSSES

A. Basic Rcstressing b o t a
1) Nomiwl Diameter mm
2) Nominal A m sq.mm
3) Nominal Mass Kg/m
\ 4) Yield Strength MPa
5) Tens~kStrength MPa
6) Minimum B 4 1 n gLoad KN
7) Young's Modulus of Elasticity Gpa ( Refer Table 1. TRC:18 )
8) Jacking Force a t Transfer (% of Breaking Laad) % ( Refer Clause 8.IRC:lB )
9) Slip at Jacking end mm ( Refer Clausell.5,IRC:l8 )
10) Caff ~cicntof Friction per radian (Refer Table 5, IRC:l8 )
I t ) Wobble Frlctlon Coefficient per metre (Refer Table 5, IRC:18 )
12) R b t ~ o ofn prestressing s t u l at 70%uts Mpo (Refer Tabk 6, IRC:18)
13) Relaxation of prestressing steel ot 50%uts MPa
14) Age of concrete for 1st Stage prlstrcssing days
15) Age of concrete for 2nd Stage gopvstrusing dw
16) Dia of Prestwsing buct mm
17) Concrete &ode Wa
18) Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (28 days) MF
B. M a i l s of Prestressing Cables
C
El, Rise in mbh ut mL Jacking end E3, E f f c c t i Cover
~ t o 6bk
2. Risz in cdk a t tk end of c u d portion
1 Lb
C
ffan o f Cabk
a;:
~ b wmon.
n PI
I?.Clr43CI
CI s 3
Flyover at Karur Design Of Superstructure
The following calculations pertain to the design of single span PSC Post Tensioned T-
Beam with Cast in situ Solid slab. The span arrangement is as shown in the attached
sketch.
The proposed arrangement of PSC girders has been shown in the following pages.
The beams are supported on bearings and the prestressing is canied out. Then the Deck
slab and cross girders are cast. The spans for the beams on bearings is 22.80 m .
The Dead load of beam and slab are taken to be acting on the individual section and
fi the SIDL and live load are taken to be acting on the composite section. The distribution
of the same is calculated by grillage analysis, using STAAD-Pro.
The bending moment and shear forces are calculated at different sections and the beam
is checked for stresses at different stage of casting and prestressing. The stresses for
temperature are taken with 50% Live Load.
Girder Section is also checked for shear based on the ultimate theory and also for
ultimate moments, as per recommendations of IRC-18.
PROPOSED SEQWNCE OF CONSTRUCTTON AND PRESTRESSmG
1 Cast the beams in situ in span either on staging or casting truss.
2 Prestress Stage I Cables after 14 days, after a concrete has attained a strength of 30 Mpa.
-?
3 Position the beams on permanent bearings
4 Erect staging and shuttering for RC top slab supported from bottom bulb of girders.
5 Cast the top RC Slab together with diaphrams.

7 --_
6 Stress Stage I1 cables after 42days of Girder casting, after concrete has attained
a strength of 40 Mpa
,
' -' :\
7 Cast the crash barrier on either side.
8 Lay Wearing Coat.
- -
Cg$
LASA
SUMMARY OF UCmA EXTREME FIBRE STRESS (Considering 20% Extra time Dependent Loss)
4
--A-
stage Top of Slab Top d girder Bottom Allowable Stre#e
max +ve max -ve max +ve max-ve max +va max-ve T6mpwsvStag
After 1st stage p f e s h ? ~ -3.57 -101.52 1206.35 680.43 Cornp 2C
Before 2nd stage prestress 3.71 -81.50 1134.77 644.41 Tension 1
After 2nd stage prestress 93.76 -39.72 1276.98 641.83

Before messing of Gr. I11 cables -11.50 -44.93 489.56 234.31 942.38 504.22 -Stage
After 3rd stage pmstress -11.50 -44.93 489.56 234.31 942.39 504.22 Normal Case
Before S h i i of Bearing -11.50 -44.93 489.56 234.31 942.39 504.22 Slab Comp 11
ARw shiftof Bearing -11.50 44.93 489.56 234.31 942.39 504.22 Girder Cornp 1:
Before SIDL -11.25 -44.75 489.62 234.48 941.68 503.83 Tension
Sb-ea at service 64.10 20.74 542.86 247.93 737.67 381.18
After considering hyperstatic 64.10 20.74 542.86 247.93 737.67 381.18 Temperature Case
Stress at service (with LL sag) 207.55 92.06 633.23 296.23 557.41 167.55 Slab Comp 1:
Stress with U(sag) + diff shr 160.61 30.59 821.73 470.15 475.66 85.80 Girder Comp I!
Stress with diff shr w/o LL 17.16 40.73 731.36 421.85 655.92 284.45 Tension
*stress at service (everything but temp) without LL 17.16 -40.73 731.36 421.85 655.92 284.45
'
L- Sbess with SO%U(sag)+bemp rise 571.46 97.24 769.82 415.79 625.03 296.28
Stress with SO%LL+temp fall 0.58 -243.76 869.00 580.21 474.60 145.85
I- unit 1 2 3 4 s
-
Chamage of Sectlon fmm left sumrt rn Zoo0 2.850
,Total Loss in Prestms T 66.12 71.48 75.38 80.20 80.00

L
FlyowrtKanrr tkripaaf-
CmPlderln 20% Extra Tfme

Item Unit 1 3 3 4 5
,thahaqcd%y3bnfmmleRarppart rn . ZOO0 Zasb 5.m lUOb
Detatls of Sation property UndMdual Eiearn ?3!!&an)

r I
Areadthesechon rnJ 1.2616 0.80R8 0.80B8 0.80B8 - 0.8080
Depth of ttrc s?blan rn 1.85QO 1.8500 1.R500 1.8SW 1.8500
CG orsecb~nh . boltan~ m 0.933 0.94~ 0 , 9 6 8 0.~68 0.9468
Inertia el sedan m4 0.3829 0.3183 0.31R3 0.3183 0.3183
m"
Tag Sexion MadutoS
Botbm SecMn Modulus my
0.4323
0.3470
D 3524
0.332
0.3524
0.3362
0.2524
0,3362
O 35.2,:
0.33b2 I
m i l s af Saebian pmpertv (Om- Sedan) 114 dav d d dab1
Area d the sxtlon m.' 1.9631 1.51133 1.5103 1.5103 1.5103

DCpthdmeswtign m 2,lWO 2.1000 2.1000 2.1000 2.1000
CG 01 -on fmm bdltQm m 1.3255 1.4244 1.4744 1.4244 1.4244
Inertla of seEtlon rn' O.Rri7O 0.7191 0.7191 0.7191 0.7191
Top Section Modulus mJ 1.09.37 1.06-14 1 . 0 ~ 1 . 0 ~ 1.m
Bdawn Sml MModdS m' 0.6393 0.5048 0.50-1E 0.5048 P.WC1
-61s d SsEtlon pmparN (Canpwits SwHanI
CG ofseCtlan hm M V x n
In- of section
Top section Modulus
Flyover at Kawr Design of Superstructure
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
Chairwe of Section from left support rn 2.m ZBSO 5.780 AfSb 11-
No of Tendons of 19T13 2.00 2.00 ' 2.00 2.00 2.00

Flesmsing Force (PI) T 420.60 435.66 446.29 459.H 457.37
CG of Tendons from Bottom rn 0.4775 0.2867 0.1578 0.1400 0.!41#!
E a m t r W y of Tendons m 0.4868 0.6601 0.7890 0.8068 0.8068
Presbessing Factor (TOP) -0.3335 -0.6366 -1,0024 -1.0529 -1.0529
,Pres!reSqq F a r (Pcrttom) - LO189 3.2001 3.5835 3.6365 3.6365 -
-
LASA
4 5
Chainaqe of Sedion fmn left support rn ZOQQ Zt60 5.700 11550 1

-
From 14 to 42 day
due to GR I Tendons
Stress Due to C+S+R

Top ~/m' 5.95 12.16 20.02 22.20 22.01
Bottom Tjm2- -3.01 -61.10 -71.59 -76.69 -76.00
'Stress befowmeswng of GR II cables at42 day
I
Top ~ / m *
Bottom ~ l m '
2.38
644.41
-57.89
1085.35
-81.50
1134.77
-33.59
1115.55
3.71
1071.17
S I n s at CG of Tendon GR I f/rn2 478.70 408.1R 1031.02 1028.59 W.39

Stress at CG of Tendon GR II ~jm' 211.79 462.19- 65043 832.24 886.53
A v c m r p SbeFs at CG of Tendon GRI ~jm' s25.58
Avcraqe S b e a at CG or Tendon GRn ~]m' , 623.51
G W P lea WheCkl T 6.B2

-(O.OOOs714 OoO37~*2..OOOOOS2314789'Q,W10~*195D0000*1..2'925.58110M)
Flyover at Karur Design of Superstrudure
Itan -Unftr 1 Z 3 4 5
C b h e of Stdon fmm left supgcrl rn 2- ZfBU . 5.m &!SO 11.4-00
~DetaihdStapeXlp~npatter42day
lIDof T~ndonsof lQT13
P r ~ n mrce g (P21
CG of Tcndons from Bottdm
-
,
i Ecccntnctty of Tendons
Prestre~s~nq F a c m Uop)
YarCIc Shaeninp LO.J

Elastic Shwtening Loss of Gr IT T OM 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Elastic Shortening Loss of Gr Itendons due to
Gr I1 tendons T 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80
PZ-elon [Ill T 62.34 63.15 64.07 65.90 66.69
Check for Elon I) EF 0.W
Stress due to P2eloss(II)
Top ~/m' 90.12 89.12 41.02 -10.14 1 -36.16
Botrom ~/m' 5.09 66.51 119.28 175.25 296.81
r ~ e s due
s to Elon of Gr Itendons due to Gr lI tendons-
2.42 3.81 4.00 4.00
I
-12.17 -13.63 -13.83 -13.83
33.65 -36.66 -39.72 -28.45

BottDml TI^' 641.83 1139.69 1240.41 1276.98 1264.15
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
Chainape of Section from left surrwrt rn -

.
2 Z#U 5.700 8.556 1
-
StressduetoC+S+R
.
Top ~ / m ' 1.36 1.20 0.86 0.42 0.17
EbtWn ~ / m ' -0.43 0.41 -0.23 0.02 0.35
Saess kfore stredno or GR lIl caMes at 42 day

Top of Deck Slab ~/m' - 1 1 -18.37 -J2.89 41.84 44.93
Tm of Ghder ~/m' 23431 256.57 352.95 491.83 489.S
bttm f/n? M4.22 942.33 896.59 857.36 $13.45
Skes at CG of Tendon I ~ / m ? 434.56 836.10 8R.05 825.92 7R8.94

Y r w at CG of Tendon U - 1/mJ 322.34 938.56 681.31 754.92 757.42
813.45
.5t?ess Bt CC.dTf@wl III ~ / d 504.22 . 962.38 898.59 857.36 i
:.v,-.irqt= 5tres at C b . r t Tyrdorr G91 ~/m' 7R1.45
s C L o' Tendm LR!I
Average S r r ~ s at ~frn' 636.17
Avmarp 5mzs at St d Tmbm GQrII ~!m? 03.20
1
R e l m o n Factw for Gr, I1
AS per IRC 18 : 2000 Tabte 4B 0.740
~ mrd soan
.~ela*?ttlnrlLvss of 1;r. TI L + b l at
p ~ p c k 'OC Crwv Iw5 of Gr I1 Cab15

=!O MO387-0 0W387)*0.526315 ?3P4736B4'0.[#Ilfl753*199MX1M)*I5*636.16 0.m
'~darratmFactor far Gr. I

,= .W16 - 0.74 a 0,162
Rela fa: ion Loss of Gr. I Cables at mtd span
t h m Iw Crwp L o a of Gr I: Cables
=IO.C003874 000337) "7.OOa00526315f84W 0018753w195D0Q00*12*781.45353 Om
m ,---
LASA
p-lng Faetor
Gr. I 'np 6.27 4.41 -0.n 4.w -0.54
Gr. IBottom 1.# 2.42 3.17 3.21 3.21
Gr. I1 Top 0 .+I 0.27 0.02 4.25 -0.38
Gr. I1 Ronm 0.63 1.49 2.02 2.511 2.85
Gr. m Too 0.00 0.00 0.Dl 0.00 0.00
I
Gr. UI bttom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.M
Etastlc m r n p loss due to Gr Ill Tendons

~ 1 x an5 t r I11 T 0.m 0 . 0.~) a.00 0.M
tlm rn Gr. II T 0 .M1 0.00 0.WJ 0.00 0.00
~105sIn Gr. 1 T 0.00 0 00 0 DO 0.00 (1.00
P3-EloSS T 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 0.00 0.00

Stress due to P3-Eloss
~ n p TI^^ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottwn f/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
*stress due to Eloss of & I1

Top ~/m' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stress due to Elom of Gr I

TOP ~/m' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
mom ~/m' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1
rwa m Elass I
Top of Deck Sbb ~ / m ~-11.M -18.37 -32.89 41.84 4.93
Top of Girder ~/m' 234.31 256.57 352.95 441.83 489.56
Bottom ~/m* 5D4.22 942.39 898.59 857.36 813.45
Stress at CG of Tendon I ~/m' 434.56 836.10 852.05 825.92 788.94

Stress at CG of Tendon I1
Average Wess at CG of Tendon GRI

Averwe Sbess at CG of Tendon GRJI ~/m' 636.17
- 4 9 9 m s er Ct arT-n GRm ~!m' 839.29 ,
osa
LASA
,Check for loss due to E l m c Sllortcninq
Gr t 0.00 0.0
Gr n 0.w oa
Grm 0.OD 0.0
PratP!dng FBcta I
Sr. I T w 4 . 7 -0.91 -0.9 4-54
Gr. 1 Bomm I .R4 2.92 3.17 3.21 3.21
Gr. I1 Tr)p 0.44 0.27 0.02 -0.25 -0.38
Gr. TI BoKm 0.63 1.49 2.02 2.58 2 85
t r , 1II Top 4 . -0.60 -0.68 4.68 -0.68
3
Gr. m Wttom .48~ 2.58 3.48 3.49 3.44
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
U~ainaqeof m n from left support m ZPda ZsSo - 5.700 &!SU it-

Losses fnwn 42th to 42th day
SbesresduetoC+S+R
Top ~ l r n ~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom M
T rn2 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
'51ress befwe shR of Bearlm
TwdaedtSrsb 7fd -11.51) -1.437 -32.89 41.84 4.93
Tap ofC;lrder ~ / m ' 234.21 E6.57 352.95 411,83 ' 489.56
&onim flm' 504.22 94942.39 898.59 857.35 813.45
hess at CG of Tendon I ~/rn' 134.56 836.10 R51.05 825.92 7w94
s CG of Tendon I1
S ~ e s at ~/m' 372.35 5#.56 M1.31 751.'32 7R.42
Stress at CG ufTendon In ~/m' 504.22 942.39 89B.59 857.36 813.45
Averqe S M at CG of Tendon GRI ~/m? 7R1.45 -
Average SbesE at CG of Tendon GRII ~/m? 635.17
Average 5tff54 Bt CG d Tendon GRm ~[mj H39.29
Relaxation F a m Gr III
0.m
C M k f o r s a x a t h n l o ~ of
r Gr IlI
= c I . W O ' ~ ~ - ( ~ . ~ - ~ ( O . Q O ~ ( O ~l~~.OO+~E~*~~~~~.DQ .3Z)~*~O. .~ W~ 1 * 1 ~ 2
Check For Creep LWE. of Gr III Cables
=J&[037-0.0003R7)'0'0.00 tH753*195~'l.2*839BYlMM 0.M
0.m
Relaxat~onLoss of Gr. ll CWw
- d Chprk for CrwP Loss af Gr I 1 Bbk
=jl? D00387-0 W0387)"0.526315789473684*(1.M1187a1t95WOW)'1.2*636.16 0.00
-
LASA
1tem Unit 1 2 3 4 5
,Ulainage of Section from left support rn ZOBO 28S4l UOO LS- IMOQ
PPlamtlon F e Gr E
0.m
Relamth Lea af Er. ICables
=o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ D ~ I z . D o o D o s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J * ~ ~
Chwk !or C r e w L a @F Gr I Cahles
=to ~ G W - 0a m j ~ 7 ) = 2 . ~ 1 ~ ~ o n 6 3 i m o . w 1 ~ m ~ i ~ ~
0.m
-1.~18~.4~1,
oma ant due to sift of Bearinas ~ r n 0.m I 0.00 0.m o,oo 0.m s
r,, !
Stress due to Sh~ftof Beanngs
TOP TI^^ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
~otfom TI^^ 0.00 om 0.00 0.00 o.00
S t r e s s after shift of bearings

Top of Deck Slab ~ / r n ~ -11.50 -18.37 -32.89 f 1.84 44.93
Top of Girder T/rn2 234.31 256.57 352.95 441.83 489.56
Bottom ~/m' 504.22 942.39 898.59 857.36 . 813.45
L o s s s s from 42 to 42 day
,Creep Loss of Gr. UI Tendons I T ' 0.m 1 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 0.00
Shrinkage Loss of Gr. III Tendons T I 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
=(O 0001810.000181)*0*0.0018753*19500000*1.2
Relaxation Loss of Gr. III Tendons I T 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 , 0.00
Creep Loss of Gr. II Tendons 1 T 1e.ab 1ooo 000 0.W OW

Srnnkasr bss of Gr, ll Tendom I T ] -,I, I 0 0'3 fl on 0 00 0 (50
=(O OCCI 1Rl-U OWlBl )*0.5?6*0.W118753*f95~*112
r;r!~yar~onLO?< d GI. Ii rerrdom 1 1 1 -0.37 1 636 6.34 6.33 1 4.31
r
'Swessesdueto~+s+ R
I
Top of Deck Slab ~/rn' 0.25 0.27 0.26 0.22 0.18

Top of G~rder ~ / r n ~ 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.08 0.06
Bottom ~/rn' -0.39 4.71 4 84 -0.94 4,86
Wess before SIDL
Top of Dedt Slab ~/m' -11.25 -18.10 -32.63 41.61 44.75
TopofGirder T/& 234.48 256.73 353.08 441.92 489.62
Bottom ~!m' 503.83 941.68 897.76 856.43 812.58
Stress at CG of Tendon I ~]m' 434.31 035.53 651.30 825.06 nB.14

Stress at CG of Tendon JJ ~lrn' 3221.34 568.32 680.86 7-23 756.72
9 m s a t C G c(Tendon El m 503.83 94L,M 8-97.76 856.43 812-58
k v e r a !~3 e s at CG of Tendon GIU ~/m' , 780.3
kveraw Sbess at CG of Tendon GRII f/m" 635.73 .
A v e r y e Sbrffs at CG ofTendon GRm Tfm2 838.52
LASA
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 1 s
Chainage of Sedion hwt left support m 2.000 2S5fk 5.70Q a550 lUOO
0.m
ChedcfwdarellanbssofGrIll
=0.~*[1~0.7-{(83B.5~[D*3.09.03)~}~2LZ.~100*~D.75*349.03)*Q.MID*~2
Checx for Creep Lo55 of Gr IT1 C a b l ~
-=:0.000387-0W ~ H 7 ~ 1 ' 0 * 0 . 0 0 t 8 7 5 3 ~ 1 9 ~ * l . 2 * 8 3 8 . ~ 1 7 / 1 O W
Rclmatfwr Factor Cr II
0.00
= O R 5 -0.71- 0 0.110 1
Relavaron Lo= d Gr. !ICa
m
Checl4 fur Crccu Loss oZGr IT Cables
RelmaMtn Factor Gr I
-
-0.752 - 0.74 0.1616 0 s -
Rela*anon Loss af tr. I Cabler
bOS0
C t w i fw C m a Loss of Gr 1 r_ab(es
I
SIDL applisd at 42th day Trn 21.70 77.10 6R.m 68-70 84.30
Srress d m to 51rtL
Top ~lm' 19.84 25.46 57.03 64.54 79.20
~/m' -33.95 -53.68 -121134 -136.M -166.98
Stress at CG of Gr I Tendons T/mZ -21.73 42.88 -106.92 -122.71 -150.57

Stress at CG of Gr I1 Tendons T/rn2 -2.02 -15.68 -58.05 -92.51 -129.47
StressatCGofGrlIlTendons ~/m' -33.96 -53.68 -12024 -136.08 -166.98
Gain due to SIDL T -0.51 -1.09 -2.83 -3.40 -4.27

stress due to gain
Top ~/m' 1 4.38 -1.30 -1.68 -2.19
80ttom ~/rn' 0.93 3.03 8.56 10.55 13.41
LASA
Flyover at Karur
*
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
Chainacre of W o n from left support m 2.000 . ZU50 5.700 h!WO l%4&@
Creep loss of Gr. II I T [ '4.w- 4.30 4.a 4.30 1 4.W

loss of Gr.
Shr~nkaq~ II ) .:!5
7' I
4.1R 4 18 4 ,fl 4.18
=I0 ClUD 1 8 1 ] ~ 0 . S 2 G 3 1 5 ~ ~ * O O 0 0 I 8 71.2
~*1~~*
, R ~ l a x a l l o nl o p of Gr. I1 I T 1 .?.I4 -6.94 -6.72 -6.49 -6.0'3
-stressdue to C+S+R
Top ~/m' 12.27 20.66 28.61 31.72 31.84
Battom ~/m' -89.63 -153.36 -175.63 -188.97 -188.98
-
Sbes during Wee at infinity
Top of Deck Slab ~/m' 20.74 27.64 51.71 52.96 64.10
Top of Girder T/m2 247.93 272.33 392.00 486.33 542.86
Bottom T/rn2 381.18 737.67 610.44 541.93 470.02
S w s s at CG of Tendon I ~lm' 346.79 665.56 591.81 97.72 475.54

Stress at CG of Tendon Il f/m' 201.39 484.02 523,45 52B.22 402.62
5tmss st CG dTendon id 381.18 737.67 610.M 541.93 470.02-
Aver- Stress at CG of Tendon GR1 ~im' 551.56 -
A w m Stress at CG of Tendon GRII ~{n' 48068
Average S m s al CG ortendm GRm ~fm' 57H.91
P . ~ l W ~ oFaaor
n for Gr m =
=2 + ( 1- 0.000-O.QOD) 3.0m
Rclawat~antors or 5r Ln Cables at mid !pm
.=3,rsoo*(l+o,r-(o.m/(o.m=
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ I o ~ z P ~ ~ ~ I ~ E ~ o L ~ o . ~ s * ~ ~ ~ . o ~ ~ ~ . ~ I - ~
Check for Gmp Ill Ghlcs
Lor;s of t r
L~(13.0#3B7)'0.WIMl*0.~1 8 7 5 3 ' 1 9 ~ * l . Z m R B . 9 1 r / I W o 0,W
R~~ Factor fur Gr II =
= 2 + ( 1- D.7404.000-0.110) 2.SO
Relamtlan Lnss or Gr. II Cables at mid span
= 7 I50*11-k0.740W f ( 0 . S 2 6 3 1 5 7 8 9 ~ 7 3 ~ 4 ~ . O 3 ~ ) ~ 2 ) 1 2 2 ~ 1 0 0 * ~ O O ~ , O 3 ~ ~ . R W 1 S 7 829 4 7 3 t i & 4 N 1
Check for Cree~L m s of Gr !I Cables
l . 3 0
1-
1Rdmatim Factor Tw Gr I =
2414.74 lo:16 t e ;Q- aorw
Relaxatrnn Loss of C;r. I C.a h k.at mid %mr!
2.048
1
-=2 05+l:1-(0.7.1((0.0~.0).0 01/2.owooi263m*~19.0911~03~~.5110~)*10.7~349.03~+1100~0~315784~1.~

Check for Creep loss of Gr E Cabl~s
=[000iI387)'O S5315~4473584~D.D018753*195(#WWCL2*B1.%~100[) 1l3.73
- -
LASA
-
-Stress at sRJiee w t h thW Lwd t';agsiw)
Top of Owk 9ab T / d 92.06 113.13 161.62 M5.53 207.55
TopolGirder ~ / m ' 296.23 326.19 461.24 582.45 633.23
5 2 4 167.55
Moment~ueto Live Load (Saggind
Stren at Service with Live Load (Sagging) includhq h w e d a t l c effects and rRfferentialsettlement
,A Top of Oedt Stab ~ f m ' 92,W 113.13 161.62 205.53 207.55
Top of Girder 7]m' 196.23 326.19 461.24 5R2.45 633.23
i
Bottom T]m' 259.11 59.41 378.68 22024 167.55
RTea due to Mffwenbd Shtlnkaw Ek Creep

P Tm 190.79 1W.79 190.3 190.- 190.751
e m 0.65 0.55 (1.55 0.55 0.55
T q ofW gab ~ / r n ' 61-46 46.99 4.94 46.94 46.99
TopofGIdm ~ i r d 173.92 1R8.50 1RR.M 1M.9 188.50
h t k a ~~
~ / d -96.73 -81.75 -81.75 -81.75 41.75
Smsr at service with differential shrinkage and difkrerrtial veep effect (with Live Load)
Top of Deck Slab ~ / m ' 30.59 66.19 114.68 158.- 160.61
TopofGirder T/rn2 470.15 514.68 649.74 ff0.94 821.73
at service with differential shrinkage and diirentiai creep effect (without Uve Load)
I Top of Deck Slab ~ / m '
TopOTGmr T/m2
&Xb.m TI^'
-40.73
421.85
284.45
$;: 1 4.77
510.49 (
6.02
674.83
655.92 I 528.69 I 460.18
17.16
73131
3B8.27
<
~ u n d a r ~ L k l r w d [ ~ ) w f t h T e h m R ~
v b 50% bvr L M ~(sag] + DfferenIjal shrlnkqpe and creep
5hc5f at ~ ~ e r wn-h ,
M Top of m.k Slab Tim -5.07 23.45 59-73 82.30 m.88
TopofGlrder Tim' 44600 487.?S 615.12 722.8Q 776.54
E&mm f/m' 233.41 555.79 412.81 29933 237.04 -
-
m due m ~enm[~tselmgen s ~ r e a e s ) -
TwofD~kgab ~lm' 102.31 4flZ.V 4R2.57 W2.57 482.9
Too of Glrder ~ { m ' -30.22 -6.72 -6.72 -6.72 -6.72
~attwn ~ / dm.n 59,21 59.24 9.24 59.~4 t
LASA ' '

Itcm Unft 1 ' 2 3
-
C)la~ofSectlonfmmIERw~ - m LOW , MSd 5.m
Sln?ssatStlvbewlth509bUlleLoad(sg)+Temp~
Topd Dedr Slab T/& 97.24 506.02 542.30 564s 571.46
T o p o f h h T/& 415.79 481.03 608.40 716.17 769.82
Iktbm, TI& W.18 625.03 472.05 358.57 m
.28
...-
--.I-
I
L 4
-
.UI
.
I-
I *-I I 'L
I , r
.
I. r
I, ,r r
..t
"
" I
I'
I
...
.1 I
. L <
" L 4
" I
. I
..
- 2
I I,
I I,
3 11
II I
.
I U I
11 11 1
1 1 1 1
..,.
1 I,
D I,
m ,
I .I
I . ,
I I,
-
I
I
D li
1 3,
1 31
II
I,
,I,,
..
I
I
*
I,
.
.. ..
11 11
I I,
M U .
C I,
tl r
..
m 8 ,
..I 4 ,
I a,
n a:
- .. .....
q ,r
1 I, I
Y I,
I 0.
1 m,
1
.
1
..
1 I,
II "
U .
..
.) I?
II . SU ,
I S
..
I , I
n 3,
I I,
1 I,
7,
n tl
t,
*
n vI.
I I
7 . k
n r
.
....,
7 . L s7
m c 3
a,
" I
..I
L ,
.
I ,
" I
I,
I I
W lb
1 ',
I9 ,t ,
T
PSC BEAM AND RC SLAB STRUCTURE OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED SPAN( 1 X 25.00 m);
(OUTER GIRDER)
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
MEMBER NO
Chainage of Section from left support rn 2.000 2.850 5.700 8.5500 11.400
Details of Stage I prestrasiag after 14 day

Prestressing Force (Pl) (Hor) T 4213.60 435.66 446.29 459.64 457.37
CG of Tendons from Bottom m 0.478 0.2867 0.1578 0.1400 0.1400
Prestressing Force (PI) (Ver) T 37.87 21.40 68.41 0.00 0.00
Details of Stage I1 prestressing after 42 day

Prestressing Force (P2) (Hor) T 62.83 63.64 64.57 65.50 67.19
Prestressing Force (P2) (Ver) T 6.02 6.09 6.18 6.27 0.00
LASA
- -
Prestressins lurce (1'3) (Flor) T 0.00 00 0.00

CCi of Tendons from Boltom m 0.00CI( 1000 0.0000
Prestrmsing Force (P7)(Ver) T 0.00 ] 0.00 1 a.no I 0,Oo 0.00
Daad Load - 1st stage

Moments Tm 57.37 70.37 117.64 146.44 158.81
, Shear T 20.85 18.36 11.88 6.12 0.00
.
Shuttering l ~ d
h3arnents I Tm I 14.07 1 20.83 1 35.92 1 44.98 1 48,OO
-
Dead Load 2nd stage
Moments I Tm 50.31 1 62.43 1 110.76 137.03 148.06
Shear 1 T 20.76 1 19.63 1 11.89 6.54 0.00
Shift of Rearing
I
-
Moments Tm 0.00 I 0.0 00 0.00
Shear T 0.00 I 0.0 00 0.00
[Shear T 1 9.11 42 4.54

Torsion Tm
Hvperstatfe Effects
Moments 1 ~ m 10 1 0
1
1 0 I 0
1
Shear E T E 0 I o o I o I
Torsion
Live Load (Saegin@ (max Moment Case & max Positive Shear case)
Moments 1Tm 78.00 I
91.00 117.00 1 162.40 152.70
Shear I T 34.91: 0 23.! .SO 15.50
Torsion ITm
LASA. . . -
I"? b
Live Load (max Negative Shear case)

3.00
-
Momcnrs
Shear
Trn
T
!
Differential Wlemcnt
Moments 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stress due to Temp (Rise) (Eigen stresses) w
I
Free body moment - 0
Moment Due to Continuity effect Tm 0 0 0 1 0 I 0
Moment Due to Continuity effect Tm 0 0 0 0 0
Stress due to Temp (Fall) (Eipea Stresses) 1

top of deck slab ~ / m 5.65
~ -267.2 1 -267.2 1 -267.21 -267.2 1
top of girder TI^' 300.70 92.46 92.46 92.46 92.46
-
bottom ~ / m ' 176.04 -91.19 -91.19 -91.19 -91.19
4 .": 8
- +
u ,: 0
LASA
Stress Check for outer girder (with 20 O h extra long term losses)
d Basic Design Data
Stressing and casting sequence
1st stage prestressing 14 day

2nd stage prestressing 42 day
Casting of Deck Slab 28 day
3rd stage prestressing 42 day
Shift of Bearing 42 day
SIDL 42 day
Age of deck slab at time of 3rd stage 14 day
fdcfor Slab 35 Mpa
fckfor Girder 40 M p a
Modulus of Elasticity (Conc) 14th Day 3. LbE+OG
Modulus of Elasticity (Conc) 42st Day 3.16E+06
Modulus of Elasticity (Conc) 28th Day 3.16E+06
Modulus of Elasticity (Conc) of Deck at time of 3rd
stage prestress
Modulus of Elasticity (Strands)
Type of cables 19 TI3

Area of 1strand 9.87E-05 m2
Area of one cable 1.88E-03 rn2
no of tendons stressed in 1st stage 2.00
no of tendons stressed in 2nd stage 0.53
no of tendons stressed in 3rd stage 0.00
Jacking Force 0.75 UTS
No of Sections to be checked 5
Prestressing force per cable (lJT!j) 349.03 T
Increase Factors for losses

Elastic Shortening loss 1.o
Relaxation loss 1.2 ( Refer Clause 7.2.4, IRC:18 )
Shrinkage loss 1.2 ( Refer Clause 7.2.4, IRC:18 )
Creep loss 1.2 ( Refer Clause 7.2.4, IRC:18 )
Factor for Shrinkage loss

14th day
42th day
42th day
42th day
42th day
Infinity
Factor for Creep Losf

14th day
42th day
42th day
- 42th day
42th day
Infinity
Factor fbr Relaxation Loss

lOOOhr relaxation
Strain due to differential shrinkage and creep

Reduction factor due to creep
PSC-STRESS-INNERIdesdats LASA
Design of End Anchorage -

As per dause 17 of IRC: 18 2000
Size of Anchor Block

C/C spacing of Cable
Width of web bulb
Minimum loss after f r i o n and slip
Max force in one cable
Grade of Concrete of Girder
First Stage Prestressing after the casting of Girder
Ultimate Cable force P,
Type of reinforcement
1.0 Permissible Bearing Stress behind Anchorages

34.0 Mpa
Smaller of (i) and (ii)

(i) fb = 0.48 fG sqtt (AJA,)
(ii)f,, = 0.8 fa
fbfrom (i)
fbfrom (ii)
Hence fb -- 24634.0 K N / ~ '
Max force in table after friction and slip loss - 2078 KN
fb developed = 29591 K N / ~ '
Hence Not OK
H e n e allowable stress behind anchorage has been suitably increased by
reinforcement. CEB-FIRmdel mde has been used t o calculate the increase in
bearing stress.
According to the above code, increase in permissible stress

AF = 1.3 * U/S * A, * (fH -(ql-&)*fd*(1-(8*Msdu)/(u/~ * Nsju)) '\
Using 16 4 spirals with 300 m m ID and im-mm siJ-Tl
END-ANCH
Flyover at Karur
Where,
u = perimeter of hoop = pi*(0.3 + 0.016)
s = hoop spacing
4 = Cross sectional area of hoop reinforcement
,f = design strength of hoop = 0.87 * 415
= 320 * 320
A, = Area of concrete within hoop reinforcement
= pi/4 * 0.3"2
fd = 0.8 * f,j / 1.5
,,M = Maximum moment in hoop reinforcement zone
Increase in permissible stress = AF / Al =:
Required permissible stress = =
Hence OK
From Table 8 of IRC-18, F, / P, = -

Fm = -
-
Allowable stress in steel = 0.87fy = 0.87*415 -
Ast required = 391.38* 1000 / 361.05 -
Provide Nos. 1
Dia.
legged 1
Provide 3 nos 2 legged T16 in the form of spiral as mentioned above
Area of Steel provided 1206 mm2
OK
This reinfomment shall be provided in a zone 0.F Yo =
2Yo = 400 mm 40mmhom-
Therefore revised spacing of the spiral shall be 50 mm L r
r.- c
END-ANCH
Flyover at K m Design of Superstructure
Design of Shear Conneetor AS per dause 611.4.2of IRC: 22
Shear Force due to

Dead Load
-.
h
Shift of Bearing
Super Imposed Dead Load
Live Load
Hyperstatic
Differentialkk Settlement
Effective width of transformed section
Depth of Deck slab
Depth of Girder
Distance of C.G. of bottom fiber
M.O.I. of the composite section
Type of reinforcement
Width of top flange of the girder
VL = Longitudinal Shear per unit length

V = Vertical Shear
A, = Area of transformed section on one side of interface
Y = Distance of centroid of the area under consideration from NA of composite d o n
I= Moment of Ineftia of the section
Provide 4 leclged u$@ 280 c/c
A, = The cross section area of anchorage connector = 2513 mrn'
f, = The ultimate tensile strength of steel - 415 Mpa
Q, = Ultimate Shear capacity = A, * f, * 1u3 -- 1043 KN
Minimum reinforcement
(i) 0.15 O h of the contact area
(ii)130 mm2
Therefore min reinforcement
1' "
Y W
I
--
SHEAR-CONNECTOR LASA
---- /-
Provision of Untensioned Reinforcement in Beams
a) I n Web 0.18% of Area

= 0.18/100 * 300 * loo0
Area d Ft&Wwm& provided
Minimum reinforcement in Beam

= 0.15/100 * 0.8088 * loo0
fhwkk 22 nos. 10 4
UNTENTIONED-REINF
INTRODUCTION
The following calculations pertain to the design of single span PSC Post Tensioned T-
Beam with Cast in situ Solid slab. The span arrangement is as shown in the attached
sketch.
The ptoposed arrangement of PSC girders has been shown in the following pages.
---
The beams are supported on bearings and the prestressing is carried out. Then the Deck
slab and cross girders are cast. The spans for the beams on bearings is 22.8 m .
The Dead load of beam and slab are taken to be acting on the individual seetion and the
SIDL and live load are taken to be acting on the composite section. The distribution of
the same is cdculated by grillage analysis, using STAAD-Pro.
.*
T
The bending moment and shear forces are calculated at different sections and the beam
is checked for stresses at different stage of casting and prestressing. The stresses for
temperature are taken with 50% Live Load.
Girder Section is also checked for shear based on the ultimate theory and also for
ultimate moments, as per recommendations of IRC- 18.
LASA
PROPOSED SEOUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION AND PRESTRESSING
1 Cast the beams in situ in span on staging .
2 Stress Cables first stage after a concrete has attained a strength of 35 Mpa.
3 Position the beams on permanent bearings
4 Erect staging and shuttering for RC top slab supported from bottom bulb of girders.
5 Cast the top RC Slab together with diaphrarns.
6 Stress Cables second stage after a deck slab has attained a strength of 35 Mpa.
7 Cast the crash barrier on either side.

n
"r 8 Lay Wearing Coat.
SUMMARY OF EXTRA EXTREME FIBRE SlRESS (Conslderlng 20% E r h a Hme Dependent Lass)
Top Of glrdcr llmoln Alkrrabk-

m +V t IMI-Ve mx+n m-ve TemponryStme
-17.51 -162.33 L2&.3!5 870.85 Comp 2000
-2ndstagew-= 4.65 -149.04 1133.24 825.12 Tension 200
' -2ndstagepresess
Before Etressing of Gr. III cables
93.53
427.32
-164.41
118.22
1653.31
1125.49
961.22
797.05 -Shpc
-wStagem 427.32 118.22 1125.49 797.05 Nomal Case
Befwe ShR of Bearing 427.32 118.22 1125.49 797.05 4ab C m p 1155
After shiR of Bearing 427.32 110.22 1125.49 797.05 Girder CMlp 1320
Before SIDL 427.38 118.22 1122.84 796.03 Tension 0
Sbes at servim 473.66 136.86 798.94 611.98
After considering hype- 473.66 136.86 798.94 611.98 Temperature Case
!i% atsservice (with U sag) 629.96 196.38 545.98 142.56 SbbGornp 1328
!itresi with LL (sag) + d i i shr 823.58 376.12 462.12 58.70 Girder CMnp 1518
!~FSS with diff shr wfo U 667.28 316.59 715.08 512.09 Tension 0
Stress at service (everything but temp) without LL 667.28 316.59 715.08 512.09
!3Es with 50%LL(sag)+temp It$e 165.77 .42.65 950.04 707.68
S k s with 50ahLL+temp fall 1233.92 688.53 977.41 661.93
s
1
-
OlahapcdSsctlonhom left support m

Ulit I
ZUO
I1 2
2.OSO
3
L7m
4
E.5!m 11-
,
rota1Lorr In Reaea i T 95.85 1 97.47 101.85 107.16 107.~5
Ff$nwut lCprur Design of Superslruclure
C o m l M n p 20% E x b a Tim bspcnbsclt Loss ~t

l tam Unit ' i 2 3 4 5
Wnijge of Sedm fmm leR s um m ZZSU zmtl 5.7W %W 11.-
1
-k d Ssction p r o m [IndMdual Bsrm Section)
' r
Area of ttre section m7 1.2616 0.8088 0.8088 0.8aE8
Qepthdthesectlon rn 1,8500 1.R500 1.8500 1.85QQ l.fl5M3
CG of sechan lrwn bottom rn 0.9643 0.968 0.9468 0.9468 0.968
I
Inerba of sc?ction m4 0.3823 0.3183 0.3183 0.3183 0.3183
TW Sect)on Mod* m' 0,4323 0 3521 0.3524 0.3514 0 3574
~ o t t ~ection
~n ~odu~m my 0.3~70 0.3362 0.3362 0.3362 0.3362
(Details d W o n p ~ e r t (Comudta
y Sedan) (14 day old slab)
ma of the section vm
'
1.5980 1.5980 t.5W
7.1000 Z.1MXI 2.1000 2.11#)0
1.S980
2.1000 1
Depth of the seMan
CGctfsffhonkumWttOm m 1.3533 1.45% 1 . 4 1.49% 1+4W6
Inartia of W o n m4 0.88211 0.7447 0.7447 0.7447 0.7447
f ap Se~tlonModulus Ill' 1.i624 1.1539 1.1!3;3s 1.1539 1.1539
W t o m Sectl~nModulus m' 0.6524 0.5;19.0.5114 0,5119 0.5119-
Area of the seclion

Depth of the w o n
CG of s m n worn bottDm
Inertia of secHon I
I a ~ t s l l sof Stage I prcrbhJdna aRer 14th d q

Fljperat Il@mr Design ofSuperstructure
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
-
Chainage of Section from left support m 2250 l!A!XJ 5.700 8550 2 f . a .
-
No uf Tendom of 1QTl3 2.DO 2.00 2,M) 2.00 2.00
R e i t ~ s i n gFarce ( P I ) T 431.36 435,66 446.29 459.64 457.37
Ct of Tendms fmm BottDm m 0.3173 0.2867 0.1578 0.1400 0.1486
EmntTldly of Tendom m 0.6471 0.661?1 0.7WD 0.8M3 n.H059
pmtm!W Factw Fop) - 0 . ~ ~ 2-0.t136s -1.0325 - 1 . ~ ~ 2 9 -1.0579
,Pres@esstrq Factm (BotMml 2.4225 3.2000 3.5836 3.6365 3.6365
I
Strrss a m E I M c Shorten~noloss I
~/m' -162.33 -69.67 -100.94 -55.12 -17.51
Top
Ekytbm ~/m' 870.85 1145.65 1205.35 1191.b3 1145.94
I
SIRS at CG of Tendon GR I ~ / r n ~ 693.67 957.28 1093.94 1096.82 1057.89
Aup lstrea fw each ~lm* 825.47 1025.61 1095.38 1077.36 0.00

Segment length rn 0.60 2.85 2.85 2.85 -11.40
length m 9.15
nw~StreasalCGdTe~ I nd I roso.u
1050.3366
for loa due to e W c sbtmhw T 12.15
050.34. I I ~ s M ) ~ ~ ~ *2~1.tlc)18m=l
~ F ~ o M ) o ~
F f ~ e r a'I@sur
t Design ofsupemtrudufe
Item Unit 1 2 3 ' 4 5
+Chairmeof Section hwn left s u m m 22M 2850 5.m SSW ll.400
Total loss (C+S+R)
Stress Due to C+S+R

Top ~ / m ~13.29 12.24 20.17 22.36 22.16
BottMn ~ / m ' 1 -45.73 -61.56 -72.11 -77.21 -76.52
tress before stressing of GR I1 cables at 42 day

Top
Bottom I T/m2
T/m2
-149.04
825.12
-57.42
1084.09
-80.77
1133.24
-32.76
1113.92
4.65
1069.42
,
Stress at CG of Tendon GR I ~/m' ' 658.06 907.17 1029.71 1027.14 988.84
Sm at CG of Tendon GR I1 T/m2 38.79 572.94 767.92 937.20 988.84
~ v stress
g for each segment T/m2 782.61 968.44 1028.42 1007.99 0.00
Segment length m 0.60 2.85 2.85 2.85 -11.40
lenqth m 9.15
[~verageStress at CG of Tendon GRI 1 ~/m' 1 946.86 (
Avg shes for each segment ~ / r n ~ 465.86 670.43 852.56 963.02 0.00
Segment lensth m 0.60 2.85 2.85 2.85 -11.40
lenqth m 9.15
Awraqe !3ess at CG of Tendon GRlI 1 r/m2 1 737.97
PSC -STRESS-OUTER/pscbeam
af~eratlYpmr Design of Superstmdure
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
mawoe d Section trdm IeR 9 ~ ~ P r t m 22SU 2.- alaa a550 11.400
-1s of Stme I1 pmbtsslng m r 42-day

No of Tendons of 19T13 084 0.84 ' 084 0.M 0.84 1
Prestresino Force (P2) f 162,43 162 33 165.30 167,67 172.0
CG of Tendons from Bottom m 0.M56 OR?W 6.5567 0.2851 0140
Eccer@Ycitvor Tenduns rn 0 DIR? 0 1184 0901 06617 O.8Oiti
~ n g (Tm)
P e h - ~ ~ Factor 0 6105 0 9005 0.1715 -0.W12 -1.0579
PresO~~~
FadOr
n q (Mtt017t) O.Wl0 1.5RR7 2.3969 3.2WB 3.6365
Elasbc Shorten~ngLoss of Gr Itendons due to I

Gr I1 tendons T 9.46 9.46 9.46 9.46 9.46
P2-el- (11) T 160.46 160.96 163.33 165.70 170.02
ih*lrfor E~OSS -0@4 0.43
stress due to PZ-~\OSS(II)
97.96 144.94 21.15 -106.24 -179.02
r
Top T/m2
Bottom ~ l r n ~ 159.01 255.72 391.49 531.04 618.29
Stress due to loss of Gr Itendons due to Gr 1'1tendons

- 1
TOP T/m2 6.66 6.02 9.48 9.96 9.96

Bottom TI^^ -22.91 -3026 -33.89 -34.39 -34.39
Shes after M n g of Gr. I1 Tendons
Top ~ l m ' -44.41 93.53 -50.14 -129.05 -164.41
Battom ~ ! m ~961.22 1309.55 1490.84 1610.57 1653.31
Smss at CG of Tendon I ~/m' 788.76

~ [ m 479.82
~
1121.08
765.04
1359.42
1027.13
1478.92
042.48 1
Avg sbess f w each segment T/m2 954.92 1240.25 1419.17 1497.34 0.00
Segment length m 0.60 2.85 2.85 2.85 -11.40
Ien4th m 9.15
I I
~ ~ ~ i n ~ v e t a p e ~ a t C G b~ ~i mw l d 410.48
o n ~ ~ 1 1
Avg stress for each segment ~ l m ' 622.43 896.08 1184.80 1429.12 0.00
Segment length 0.60 2.85 2.85 2.85 -11.40
lenuth
Fbwn at Qtur Design ofSuperslructure
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
Chainage of Section from left s u ~ ~ o r t m 2.250 ZA50 5.700 8.550 l.lm
S h u t b h g Load Moments I Trn 1 14.07 1 20.83 1 35.92 1 44.98 1 4800

Ihad (fur casllnq of Deck Slab)
Stress due to stt~~tter~nq
Top T/m 32.55 59.11 101 92 l27.63 13620
Wnrn ~ / m ' -35.44 -61.96 -1W.85 -133,80 -142.78
D a d Load M ~ Stape - Ttn ~60 40 1 74.77

~ ' 136.75, 162.94 174.83
Strtr5 t0 deaf! lo&d
Top T/d 139.72 2LZ.16 371.01 462.35 496.08
Wm ~lrn' -152.14 2 -388.93 -4R4.68 -520.04
Stress at CG of GR I Tendons ~/m' -102.08 -155.06 -324.12 -413.02 -443.16

Stress a t CG of GR 11 Tendons ~/m' -12.42 -27.82 -160.25 -338.74 -443-16
Fain due to dead load of D e d ~

Slab T -2.48 -3.86 -9.06 -12.85 -14.56
Stress due to Galn
Top ~/m* -1.59 -2.04 -7.31 -12.17 -15.34
Bottom ~/m' 5.84 11.91 . 30.60 45.31 . 5296
!&es due to rdease of huttwtnq I d
I
Shes5 affer d e m e or sbutWrh0 load
Top of Deck Slab ~fm' -11.90 -18.M -31.13 -38 9B 41.60
TopofGlrder f/m' 318.35 351.70 396.41 424.88 927.05
- Battwn ~/m' 801.06 1077.77 1095.83 1125.25 1137.20
Flyover at Xpmr Design of Superstmcture
- Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
Chainaqe of Section from left s u ~ ~ o r t m 2.2% Z@JO 57W BSSO ilADD
Losses from 42 b 42 day
rinkage loss of Gr ITendons
Stresses due to C + S + R
Top Tim2 0.39 0.43 0.98 1.52 1.88
I
Bottom T/rn2 4.00 -6.09 -8.13 -10.26 -11.72
~beforesbasimofGRmcaMtsat42dqr . , -
Top of Deck Slab T/m -11.51 -1763 -30.15 -37.46 -39.71
Top nfG!rd~r T/mZ 118.22 351.35 3%30 427.00 427.32
Botmm ~ { m ' 797.05 107 1.68 1067.70 1115.00 1125.49
Strers at CG of Tendon I T/m' 680.64 W.03 1028.73 1QS2.18 107265

Stress at CG of Tendon Il _ - - T/m2 472.10 749.13 879.64 1WII.66 1072.65
!%R?SS at CG dTmdm LII - / 197.05 1071.68 1M7.70 1115.W lL25.49
Av~rage5tr-5 a~ i5 u4 Terdr~nGRT ~ l m ' 932.05
Average Stress at CG o l T cndon GQII Tfm' 852.45
,AV~~;MC!5hm at CG of Tmdun GRUF Tfm' 1058.91
RelaxaPon Factor for Gr. 11

,Asppr IRC 18 , ?000 TaMe 48 0.7 40
Relaxanon LOSSof Gr. 11 Cdb1s at mid spsn
~O5L6315789*l12
=~.f40*(1-(0.7~D.0~(0,E42110526315789'3r19.O3~~~D.2).2.5~lbay~.~~.O3IvUI)84Zf
'cnecl. fw Creep Loss of Gr Il Cables
=i0.000387-0.OW13&7)'D.8421 1C~52631~119a0.0D18353*195000DO*13C8RR4CD.MHJ
~ k l p t a t b nFactw fm Fr. I 1 I
= .W16- 0.74 = I0.162
Relaxation Loxs of Gr. 1 C s b b at mid span
= O . :62'( l-[O.f-(160.453!(0.84LLlDR63 1RS9349.03~~~/0,2~*2,S~100*[OOTS~M99Q3~*I148421
10526315789*l.2
Check for Crwp L a a of (;r T I Cabler
*I=:O.NKl387-0.'JF113P7)': '0.00 18753' 1 9 ~ * 1 3 f 9 B t C 4 9 / 1 ~ 0.W
-np Fa*
1:r. I T?D 4.39 -0.3 -0.50 -0.51 -0.51
Gr. I Bottom 2.08 2.91 3.16 , 9.19 3.19
Gf. TI Ton 0.0s 0.08 -0.15 -0.39 -0.51
Gr. ll Rattom 1.23 1.85 2.38 2.91 3.19
~ r m. Top 0.GP 0.M 0.00 0.00 O.Cl0
Gr. Dl Botmm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.W 0.00
Elasbc shortmmg I m due tD Gr II?Tmdam

E l 0 5 ~nGr I11 'I 0,bo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Eloss In Gr. I1 f OD0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
elm In Gr. I T D.OO 0.00 0 00 DOE) 0.W
P3-Ekm I T 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Stms due to P 3 - E l m
TOP T/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom Tim2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stress due to E l w of Gr KI
Top ~/m' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom Tlm' , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
S m d u e t o EimdGr t
TOP Tim2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom ~/m' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stresses after Eloss

Top of Deck Slab ~ / m ~ -11.51 -17.63 -30.15 -37.46 -39.71
Top of Girder ~/rn' 118.22 351.35 396.30 425.00 427.32
~ l m ' 797.05 . 1071.68 1087.70 1 1115.00 . 1125.49 1
a t CG of Tendon I / MNI.64 9613.03 1 1028.33 1 1052.78 1072.65
stressat CG d Tendon n,_ - ~lm' 472.10 749.13 879.64 1008.66 1072.65
,Wess at CG of Tendan IIt ~/m' 797.65 lD7i.68 1087.70 Ill5.00 ll25.49
Adcrao? Stress at CG of Tendon GRI T/til 9P2.05
AwnsC Stress at CG nf Tcndon GRII - 7)m' 852.45
AvMage CG d T M o n G m Tjm' 135F sl
rt r3
2
- - EJ J
LASA
Item Unlt 1 2 3 4 5
I
Chainaoe of SectIan from leftsupport m 225Q 2850 L7W lSS0 IZ-
lrw~easeIn Average stress at cg of Tendon Gr

4rn2
Imm'A-maegm* G
m T rn2 0.m
C k k for loss d w ta Flashc Shortentnq

Gr I 0.w
Gr ll 0.W
Gr Ill 0.Oa .. -
IPmstmdnq Factur
Gr. l T ~ p -0.39 -0.39 -0.50 -0.51 -051
Gr. I BotbMn 2-05 2.91 3.16 3.10 3.19
~ r II
. TOO 0.09 0.08 -0.1s -0.39 -0.51
~ r n. 6ottom l .lo 1.85 2.3R 2.91 3.19
Gr. 111TOP -0.M -0.63 -0.63 4.63 -0.63
tr. 111 m r n 2.56 3,47 3.47 . 3.47 3.47
F f p e r at lypmr Design 01
Supemtmcture
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
,Chainage of Section from left support m 2250 2850 5.7m 8550 11AMJ
Losses from 42th to 42th day
Stresses due to C + S + R
TOP, TI^' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom ~lm' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0LKl 0.00 -
S~IFS at ffi of Tendon I1

S t E S ar CG Qf Tendm m
A w m Sbess at CG of Tendon GRI ~;m: , o82.05
nvmagr! ~ b e s sat CG of Tendon GW ~/m' er;! <:$
Awtaqe Stress at CG of Tendon GRIII , ~/m' 1~.1!~0.~1
o.m
Check far d a m n loss 07 3 III
t
=0.000=(1-(0.7-I[0.00/(0'349.03))X0.2-25/100*(0.~349.03)=0,D0001-13
C h c k far Crrpp L
a of 6r [II Cables
=~U.000387-0.OM3A7)*OoOO001S~53*19~l.twlO58.912/1WO 0.0
d - O . m
Wauatlwr buf Gr. U
r C w p Loss of Gr 11 Cahtm
C h ~ for
=:n ~3B7-0.0003$7)'0.Wt.? 1 i 0 $ 2 6 3 1 5 7 8 9 * 0 . ~ 1 8 ~ v 1 9 ~ * 1 . 2 ' B f 2 . 40.00
1
- - 125
LASA
Fryover at Qncs Design of Superstmcfure
-
Ihm Unit i 1 3 ' 4 5
.minape of Secttu~from left support m 22SO 2AKU S.7W 8.550 1

1m
Rebmtion Factor Gr I
0.m
I Cables
Retirri3tlOn LOSSofGI.
=o.c7rro-(l<o.7-((-o.DO)R-349.03~)1m2*2+5/lwIO.fS*349.03)*2=~.2
Check for CRIJ LC% of Gr I C a w s
=(Q.W[1387-D.OOC307)'Zf0.OC119753'19~*l+Z'L982.W9/1W[, 0.00
'
' ~ o m e n due
t to Shift OF Bcarinqs Trn 0.W 0.00 0.Cm ' 0.M ' 0-W
5tress rlw :3 5919a; 3earrnps
Tap Tjm' 0.W 0. W 0.W 0.00 0.M)
T,I~~\.W 0.w w
0. 0.00 0.00
-5 alter shift of bearings

Top of Deck Slab ~/m' -11.51 -17.63 -30.15 -37.46 -39.71
T o G r d m 118.22 351.35 396.30 425.00 427.32
Bottom ~lrn' 797.05 1071.68 1087.70 1115.00 1125.49
Losses from 42 to 42 day
Creep Lass of GF.IIITendons T I - 0,DO 0,MI 0.00 D.00

P-
Shnnkaqr! Loss of GI. In Tr?ndons T 1 .I 1 ~ 1 0.n~ 0 PO D.00 D.00
=[O.@@Cl81-0.W0181!*010 M)18753*19~12
Relauamr Loss a' Gr. 111Tendons I T - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cree~Loss of Gr. I1 Tendons 1

0.W T 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 --
Shrinkage Loss of Gr. I1 Tendons 1
10.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
=~0.000181-0.000181)*0.842*0.0018753*19500000*1.2
Relaxation Loss of Gr, Il Tendons ! T 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.23 0.29
Stresesdue toC + S + R
Top of Deck Slab ~/m' 0.14 0.15 0.27 0.38 0.43
Top of Girder f/m2 0.00 -0.05 0.00 0.04 0.06
morn ~1t-n' -1.03 -1.55 -2.01 -2.46 -2.65 _
-
shes before mc
Top of Deck Slab ~1t-n' -11.37 -17.48 -29.88 -37.08 -39.29
Top of Girder T/mZ 118.22 351.30 396.30 425.04 427.38
- - Battom T/m2 796.03 1070.U 1085.69 11U.54 1122.84
5tress at CG of Tendon I T/m7 679.m 95B.72 1026.90 1060.51 1070.21

Slress at CG of Tendon I1 f/m7 471.56 748.25 878.24 1006.59 1070.21
.Stress at CG of Tendon IU ~/rn' 796.03 iC1'7U.13 1085.69 1112.54 1122.84
Aueraqe Stress a t CG of Tendon GRI lim' 980.28
Averaqe Stress a t CG of Tendon GRIl ~lm' 8:O.W
Average Stres!i at CG orTendon GRlIl ~/m' lr?5E.Q5 -
4 e;.
B F.2 'el
PSCJTRESS-OUTEWpsc beam LASA - -
~fyuuerat mrur Design of Superstnrchrre
Unit 1 2 3 4 5
,Chainageof Section from left support rn 2JSQ ZllMI 5.706 8550 iiAOO
Factor Gr E
)~dalgtion l I
0.000
Check for relamtlon Im of Gr It1
=0.OGVk(1-(0.7-(~1056.95/(0~~9.a3)3)/0,2*25f
lW[0.759349.03P0.W'1.2
meek 'or Creep Loss of Gr 111Labier
=!o.aW3B7.0.00r?387jgO*OOO01S7S38195~ 0.00
Rdambn Factw Gr 11
-
= 0.05 . 0.74 0 0.110 -
Relamtion L u i s of Gr. I1 C a b k
=O.1:G*;l-[O.t~O.WJ(O.W21 l0~fi31n89'H9.a3))l/a.2)82.5f1~~D.~349.031*O.84211OR~t~'1.2
Cnecb. tor Creep Loss of Gr [I G h l s
, = [D.000387-3.000387]*nnB.rZL 1 0 1 i Z 6 3 1 ~ 0 . M 1 1 B f S 3 * 1 9 5 ~ * 1 . 2 n B 5 0 . 0.W
~
Relaxation Factor Gr I
- -
=O.S52 0.74 0.1616 0 = - 0.050
Relaxanon Loss of Gr IC a b k
=o ~5a.r r-ro.7-c(-a OO~]?*349.03))~0.2c2.SJ100*~ODfS~349r03?*2~l.2
Check for Crew Loss of Gr I Cable
=lo 000387-0m 3 t ~ 7 ~ = ~ = 0 . 0 0 1 ~ 7 n * i19 s 3m * m . 2 ~ a00
RDL_app!icd 8 t 42th day Tm 131.80 - 39.70 61.40 8D90 80.50
<trt-% duP Po SiOL
Top T/& 26.90 34.41 53.21 70.11 59.76
t3dtm-n ~/m' 48.74 -77.55 -119.94 -158.03 -157.25
Stress at CG of Gr I Tendons ~/m' -37.32 -62.26 -106.93 -142.82 -142.11

Stress at CG of Gr LI Tendons I ~/rn~ -16.85 -33.39 -74.04 -127.05 -142.11
Stress at U; of Gr U1 Tendons - ~jm' 48.74 -77.55 -119.94 -158.03 , -157.25 -
Gain due to SIDL T -1.03 -1.77
-
-3.19
-
4.54 4.67
srm5 f ue to qarn
Top~/m' -0.32 -0.53 -1.34 -2.18 -2.40
Bottom ~/rn' 1.99 4.79 9.53 14.15 14.92
-
LASA
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 5
-
Chainage of Section from left s u ~ & rn 2.259 2850 5.700 LSW 1lMO
' ~ n a p ,Shrhka#a & R s l a d o n b8sses trmn 4 2 day upba inClnlty

Oeep lm5 ofr;i :I? 1 T oat! 1 0.W 0.M 0.00 0 00
Shr~nkaoetm n i br. TU 1 T 'IL~I octn O M D 00 0 00
=(Q 3@C18 1)'O.O~Ol*O.M118753'1950000D* 1.2
Relaxa'lor. loss af Sr nl I T O.DDI 0.00 000 . 0.00 0.00
T
Cree~loss of Gr. I1 I T I B ~ 8.77 1 8.77 8.77 8.77
Shrinkage loss of Gr. I1 I T ( 6.69 6.69 6.69 6.69 6.69
=!O 000181)*0 B42110526315789*0.0018753*19500000*112
Relaxahon loss of Gr. I1 1 T 1 3.26 3.39 1 3.96 4.53 5.58 1
'stress due to C+S+R

Top
Bottom
Tim'
~!rn' -I3729 -198.43 -231.71
39.49
-255.54
42.27
-262.87
I
---
S t r w dunnq Semce at lnfinrty
Top of Deck Slab T/rn2 34.97 36.58 54.20 70.34 70.34
Top of Girder ~/m' 136.86 366.00 428.35 470.18 473.66
Bottom Tim2 511.98 798.94 743.58 713.12 717.63
5- at CG of Tendon I 731.84 716.69 694.74 699.17

Stress at CG of Tendon I1 605.[)8 648.72 675.69 699.17
Lm zff of Tendan UI n
7
s
g 94 743.58 713.12 717.63
RveraqC Stress at CG of Tendon GRI
Av~raqeSt- at CG of Tendon GRII ~/m' 617 83
Averape Stress at CG ofTendon G N t I ~]m' 770 11
Relaxatbn Factw for &El =

= 2 + ( 1- 0.COao.mo) 3 .m
Relmatron Loss of Gr. III Cables at mid span
t0P(0075.399903~=0.0DW1*1.2
=3.O(?D':I-(0.7-(O.~~a.00'319.03~)~/0.2~*2.5f
' ~ h for
~ Creep
k Loss of Gr I11 Cahlcs
=(O.~M387~'O.OMCll'0.#18753' 195~t373d.l10/1~ 0.00
-
5 Rdaxaawl Factw fw Gr ll =
= 2 +. I - 0.749-0.000-0.110
kelaxabm Larr oi Gr JI Cab!; at mid w n
2.150
10526315789*1-2
=2.150*[1-(0 ?-(0.00/(0.842110526315789*349.03~~~0,2~~2.5~100~(O.7PY19~O3~+Q.W2~
' C ~ W for Crracp LoY, d Gr Il Cab:-
= ~0.130~387)'5).84~11~52631~~f~~0,M118753*19~~~1.2~617.~~~~1~~ 8.W .
,
Relaxation Factor for Gr I =
- -
= 2+1-0.74 - 0.1616 0 0.0561 ZbS11
Reiax;itmn Loss of Gr. I Cables at mid span
=~.cls~~1-co.~-trco.oo.o,.o~~.0~~~-~~~.03~~~~0~~~~.~1i~*~o.m~03~-~=i.~
Chec.: tcrr CreeD Lms of Fr I Cables
=(0.OD0387)'D.84211~57631RB9'0.00LB~~195~13L689.524~1DD[] 23.42
,. -
LASA
Fbmer at 'I@mr Design of Superstructure
Item
Chainage of Section from left support

Unit
m 2
.a
1 2
2.850
3
5.700
4
8.550
5
11.40~
I
'
Moment Due to Liie b a d ISaaainnl Tm 102.8 1285 2223 271.9 2W.4
Stresses due to Live Load (Sagging)
Top of Deck Slab T/m2 89.48 , 112.23 192.65 235.64 255.14
Top of Girder ~ / m 59.52
~ 68.75 118.02 144.36 156.30
Worn Tim2 -162.17 -252.96 434.23 -531.12 -575.07-
-
Stress at service with Live Load (Sagging)
Top of Deck Slab ~/rn~ 124.45 148.80 246.85 305.98 325.48
Top of Girder T/m2 196.38 434.75 546.37 614.53 629.96
Bottom TjrnZ 449.81 , 545.98 309.34 182.00 _ 14L56
5lrea at %w wtth Llve b a d [Saqplm) inctuding hypemtic fie& and dlMntral mlement
Top ofDeck Slab ~ / m ' 174.45 148.80 246.85 305.98 325.48
Top of Gh'def T/rn2 196.38 434.75 96.37 614.53 629.96
Battom ~ / m ' 449.81 545.98 3W.34 182.00 142.56
ress due to Differential Shrinkage & Creep

Tm 214.64 214.64 214.64
m 0.62
-54.43
, 0.52
40.84
0.52
-40.84
Top of Deck Slab T/m2
Top of Girder ~ / m 179.74
~ 193.62 193.62
Bottom ~!m' -99.88 -83.86 -83.86
Stress at servlce with differential !jhrlnkage and dMererVtbl creep Me13(wRh Uva b a d )
Topof Deck Slab ~ / m ? 70.02 107.96 ' 206.01 265.13 284.64
T m of Girder ~ / r n ' 376.12 618.37 739.94 808.15 823.58
BDttom f{m7 349 92 462.11 225.49 98.14 58.70
/Stress at s m c e with dtfferenbal shrinkage and d m l creep effect (without Livp Load)
Top of Deck Slab T/m2 -19.46 1 -4.27 !
13.36 29.50 29.50
Top of Qrdw ~ / m ' 316.59 1 559.62 ( 621.97 663.80 667.28
m m r~d 512.09 1 715.08 1 659.72 629.26 633.78
~ u n d a r ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ * r t t h T ~ R b c I
Grress a\ k r v l c e wtl- 50% uve Load (saq, + Dlffxenhal ShrlnkW? and creep 1
Top ot Wk Stab Ttm 25.28 51.85 109.68 147.32 1!5T.W
Top uf Gtnler ~lrn"446.36 5Q3.04 CIR0.40 73597 745.43
morn ~ / m ' 431.01 588.60 442.60 363.70 34624
,Sb.ess due to Temp (Rise) (Eigm s b f f s e s )

TOP cf Q P C ~ sbb XI^' -10.26 -227.11 -227,lI -2n.11 -227.11
Top of Girder ~ f m " -389.01 -579.66 -579,M - m . W -m.&
kbt
n flm' 334.41 361.44 361.44 3 6 1 . ~ 361.44 I I
Itcm Untt I 2 3 4 5
thalnaqe d Sectton fmm left svppaR m 2250 2.850 5.m LS5U 1Lm
sbensatScniaewRh50%LkLord(sag)+Temp~
Topol&& SLab ~ / m * 15.02 -17526 -117.43 -79.79 -70.04
Tapd Clrder T/& 42.65 14.33 101.32 156.31 165.77
T/m2 815.42 950.04 &M.OI RSJ4 707.68
Sbgs d w to Temp (Fall) (Emm Stress%)

Top af Deck Slab l/m' 57.32 223.20 22320 223.20 223.20
TopofGlrdcr ~/m' 342.17 488.49 4BP.49 488.49 458.49
Tim' , 388.01 .
-
Bottwn 230.92 39B.81 380.81 3%3.@1
+ T r n fa-
Top of- Sbb T/m2 82.60 275.05 332.88 370.52 380.27
Top of- Tld m.53 1082.48 1169.47 1224.46 1233.92
Tim2 661.93 977.41 83141 7S251 735.05 - -
iao
V 4 D W A R A - SURAT SECTION OF NH-B
Sinin due to m W shrlnksge

3 4.30E-04
4 4.10E-04
5 3.90E-04
6 3.70E-04
7 3.50E-04
8 3.33E-04
9 3.17E-04
10 3.00E-04
11 2.88E-04
12 2.75E-04
13 2.63E-04
14 2.50E-04
15 2.43E-04
16 2.36E-04
17 2.29E-04
18 2.21E-04
19 2.14E-04
20 2.07E-04
21 2.OOE-04
22 1.99E-04
23 1.97E-04
24 1.96E-04
25 1.94E-94
26 1.93E-W
27 1.91E-04
28 1.40E-04
29 1.89E-04
30 1.89E-04
31 1.88E-04
32 1.87E-04
33 1.87E-04
34 1.86E-04
35 1.85E-04
36 1.85E-04
37 1.84E-04
38 1.84E-04
39 1.83E-04
40 1.82E-04
41 1.82E-04
42 1.81E-04 ;,;-, -
43 1.80E-04
44 1.80E-04 /?' ,:
45 1.79E-04
48 1.78E-04
47 1.78E-04
48 1.77E-04
49 1.7E-04
50 1.76E-04
51 1.75E-04
52 1.75E-04
53 1.74E-04
54 1.73E-04
55 1.73E-04
56 1.72E-04
VADODARA - SURAT SECTION OF W - 8
-- k
Creep strain per 1Ompa
n 3 24.62
3.4 40.00 9.40E-04
4 43.47 9.02E-04
50.00 8.30E-04
5 54.46 7.81E-04
60.00 7.20504
6 61.87 6.99E-04
7 67.31 6.40E-04
70.00 6.10E-04
8 71.52 5.95E-04
9 74.91 5.61E-04
75.00 5.60E-04
10 77.72 5.33E-04
80.00 5.10E-04
11 80.10 5.09E-04
12 82.15 4.95E-04
13 83.95 4.82E-04
14 85.54 4.71E-04
15 86.96 4.61E-04
16 88.24 4.52E-04
LASA - - ?,?2
W.
-
VADODARA SURAf SECTION OF NH-8
LASA
-
133
VADODARA - SURAT SECnON OF NH-8 of-
~bcwerat Wrur Design of Superstructure
PSC BEAM AND RC SLAB STRUCTURE OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED SPAN( 1 X 25 m);

(OUTER GIRDER)
Item Unit 1 2 3 4 I
-
MEMBER NO ------
11.400 8.590
Chninage of Section From 1cR support m 2.250 1.R50 5.70fl
Details of Section property (Individual Beam Section)

Area of the section 0.8088 0.8088
D e ~ t hof the section m 1.850 1.850 1.8500 1.8500 1.8500
CG of section from bottom m 0.964 0.9468 0.9468 0.9468 0.9468
Inertia of section rn4 0.383 0.3183 0.3183 0.3183 0.3183
Details of Stage I p m t maing after 14 dav

Prestressing Force (PI) (Hor) T 431.36 435.66 446.29 459.64 457.37
Prestressing Force (PI) (Ver) T 21.33 21.40 68.41 0.00 0.00
LASA
Fbover at ?@fur Design of Superstructure
Details of Stage III prestressing after 42th day

I
Prestressing Force (P3) (Hor) T 0.W 0.1 .00 0.00 0.00

CG of Tendons from Bottom m 0.0000 0.0( HMO 0.0000 0.0000
Prestressing Force (P3) (Ver) T 0.00 0.L" I v.OO 0.00 0.00
9
Moments Tm 57.44 70.45 117.80 [ 146.62 159.03
Shear T 20.88 18.39 11.89-[ 6.13 0.00
Moments 1 35.92 1 44.98 1 48-00
Dead Load - 2nd Jtage

Moments Tm 60.40 74.77 130.75 162.94 174.83
h -
Shear T 24.70 23.20 14.86 7.73 0.00
7
Shift of lkaring - -
Moments ------
Tm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
, Shear T 0.M fl.m 0.00 , 0.00 --
SlDL
Shear T 13.60 12.9Q 7 5.92 1.04

Torcion Tm
Hy perstatic Effects
Moments Tm 0 0 I 0
Shear T 0 0 I 0
Torsion
9
-4 Moments Tm 105.80 129.50 1 222.30 271.90 294.40
h Shear T 47.70 46.10 1 37.30 27.90 20.10
-- [Torsion Tm 1
LASA
F&mer at Karur Design of Superstructure
Live Load (max Negative Shear case)

r 1 0.00 ( 0.00 1 0.00
Moments Tm
Shear T 1
Differential settlement
Moments Tm .--- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.W 0.00
I Shear . T 0.00 o.no OBO 0.00 0.00
Stress due to Temp (Rise)(Eigen smses)

top of deck slab T!m2 1 - t t T . I 1 , -227.1 11 -227.1 1 -227.1 1
top of girder ~ i r n ' -3X'E.rl l -57't.htr -579.66 1 -579.66 -579.66
I bottom ~ i m ' 3r4.41 3hl.44 361.44 1 361.44 361.44
Free body moment 0 7

Moment Due to Continuity effect 5 - - - - - -
Tm 0 0 0 0 0
Moment Due to Continuity effect Tm 0 0 0 0 0
top of deck slab ~ / r n ~7 . 2 223.20 1 223.20 223.20 223.20

top of girder ~ / r n ~342.1- 488.19 ( 488.49 488.49 488.49
bottom ~ / r n ~230.92 388.81 1 388.81 388.81 388.81
LASA
---
SbsChedcfwoutergirder (wtth 20 % e x h long tam ksses)
Stressing and casting sequence
1st stage w i n g day

2nd SWP P=tr-ing &Y
QWng d Deck Slab day
3rd stage m n g day
Shift of Bearing day
SIDL day
Age of deck slab at time of 3rd stage 14 day
fdcfor Slab 35 Mpa
f& for Girder 40 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity (Cow) 14th Day 3.16E+05
Modulus of Elastidty (Conc) 4% Day 3.16E+M
Modulus of Ebstidty (Conc) 28th Day 3.16+06
Modulus of ElastkHy (Conc) d Deck at tkne of 3rd
stag@-
- FtPdurusofUasbkity(Stra~)
Type d cables
Area of 1 strand
AreaofoneczlMe
wdtrendorrs*hIststage
a o a Q ~ . s $ c s s e hr2ndstage
d
no of tendons stresed in 3rd stage
Jacking Force
No of Secbiom to be checked
P=-=m fom per Cable ('Jm
~fiovtratQtuf Design of Supmlrrldrac
ItnerasreFactOrstor~
In
Elastic Shortening Iws
Rebwtlonk ( Refer Clause 7.2.4, IRC18 )
Shrin- loss ( Refer Cbuse 7.2.4, IRC18 )
I .L ( R e Clause 7.2.4, IRC18 )
,- Creeploas
F a c t m 4 b r ~ ~ k r r
14th day
42th day
42th day
42th day
42th day
Infinity
-
Fador*--
14th day
42th day
4mday
4
- .r
r
42th day
42thday
Strdn due b&fhmWshrinkage and creep

l3#alamliroDes!~6D~
3.0 CAlCULATIONS FOR FRICITON ANb SLIP LOSSES

A. &sic R u t t n s s i r g Data
1) Nominal D~amctcr D
2) Nomirvll A sq.mm
3) N o r n i ~Mass
l Pu Kg/m
4) Yield Strength FY MPa
5) Temile Strength Fu MPa
6) Minimum B w k i n g h d Pn KN
7) Young's Modulus of E b i c i t y EP~ Gpa (Refer Table 1. IRC:l8 )
8) Jacklng Force at Tmwfer (%of W i n g Lwd) Pi '/. (Refer Clause 8. IRC:l8 )
9) Slip a t Jacking end s mm (Refer Clause11.5, IRC:18 )
10) Coefficient o f Friction Ir per radlon ( Refer Toble 5. IRC:18 )
11) Wobble Friction Gaff ~cient It per metre (Refer Table 5. IRC:18 )
12) Relaxation of p l u t n s s i n g steel a t 70%u t ~ Re1 Mpa (Refer Toble 6.1RC:lB)
13) Relaxat~onof p r u t m s i n g steel a t WX uts Re2 MPa
14) Age o f concrete f o r 1st Stage p r o m u s i n g t d ~
15) Age of concrete for 2nd Stage prestrrosing td2 days
16) Dia of Prestressing Duct qd mm
17) Concrete SMde Fcu MPa
18) Modulus of Elanicily of Concrete (28 days) EC MPa
B. Details of Rcsmssing Cables
El. Rim in mbk at tk Jacking end E3, Effective Cowr to Cabk

2, Rise in cable at tk end of mrwd portion
CABLE PROFILE :
Outer Girder
A Total of 3 cables of type 19K13 ( 19 strands of 12.7 mm nominal dia each ) and proposed as
1 Dummy cable are shown in attached cable profile.
In cable 2 and 3 all 19 strands are placed and stressed to a jacking force of 0.75 UTS.
In cable 1 only 19 strands are placed and only 17 strands stressed to a jacking force of 0.75 UTS. In case of
emergency remaining cables can be stressed to 0.75 UTS, thus satisfying the requirement of 4% cables
for emergency as stipulated oin CL 22 of IRC 18.
Cables are proposed to be stressed in two stage.
Radius of circular curves at bends is maintainedgreater than 10.6m thus satisfying the clause 20
of IRC 18.Which states that R should be >= I.5+70OS13(dia )I1000 = 10.6m. The minimum spacing of
cables is maintained 180 mm, hence clear cover is more than diameter of duct.
CABLE VERTICAL PROFILE :

h
Span = 22.8 m End ciws girder width 0.4 m
Curve Radious > 10.6,hence OK
FRICTION-OUTEWCable arangement LASA

- *
I Cable no :
1Item Un~t 2 3
Coordinate at XI = m 8.4 2.2
end of curve 2. = mm 0 0
' Slope > 6, H.n#,OK

- - -
--I
Cowdinate at Xs ' m 8.2 4
start of CUM z1= mm 120 -120 Slom 3 6. HUBGOOK Sropo z 6, Hence OK
1 36b0.320
0 200 (
, ~.Q*20&0 140 ' LUqo 1 ~ ~ 0 . 1 4 0
- - -0-1
--9 -14.000 -12.000 -10.000 -8.m 4.000 4.000 -2.000 0.m 1
m I Cable Profile ( Vertical )
- -
'
.t"l.'
- -- I
a>,'
1 .
Cablen- no_: 3
.
-
--- 1
- 4
>'
Cable--no '4
I-
Fhuuer at lyllmr Design ofsupemtructure
4.0 CHECK FOR ULlTMAlT CAPACIIY IN FLEXURE A T VARIOUS SECTIONS

(Refer Clause 13.0 of IRC : 18 - 2000)
Span Length (c/c of k g . ) = 22.8
MOMENT A T DIFFERENT SCFIm
a) Failure by Yielding of Steel (M,& = O.S9db&*f,
A
b) Faihm by crushing of concrete =)
(br0..
176Cb*dbhfd+2/3*0.8*(&-b)*(db- t / 2 ) * ~ dr
f
lacaidon d' away fmm

V8 U4 3U8 V2
Ult. Moments support
1. Dcsign Ultimate Moment (Kn-m)
2. Depth of the bcom from maximum
& 4754
-
5847
-
9892
-
12285
-
13143
comp. Edge to the c.g of tendon (m) db 1.680 1.680 1.834 1.921 1.960
db = D - Y ~
3. Ultimate Tensile Strength o f steel
f~ 1670 1670 1670 1670 1670
(Mpa)
4. Area of High Tensile Steel (mm2) AS 1 5329.8 5329.8 5329.8 5329.8 5329.8
5. Ultimate Strength by yield o f I
13458 13458 14695 15390 15701
Steel (KN.m)
1 - 7
-
0.65
-
(&I+),
0.3
-
0.3
-
0.3
-
0.3
7. Flange Width of Tee (m) Bf 3.157 3.157 3.157 3.157 3.157
9
8. Thickness of Flange of Tee b a t n -
3
---- - t 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
of Concrete [KN.m)
w+)=
35165 33707 29655 33154 36674
lo. Design Ult. Strength (KN.m) & 134% 13458 14695 15390 15701
- -- - - -
OK OK OK
] B I OK OK *
. -
LASA
F5over at Karur Design of Superstructure
tal & Vertical Component of Prestress Force
Section
Stage of
sns+mssing(
Cable No.
No. o f
C a b l e s
y, (m)
I 1 0 (drg)
P,.cosO
( K M
P , . u r s ~ . Y~
w.ml
P,.sinB
KNlI
1 3 1 0.140 0.000 2094.9 293.3 0.0

SUPPORT
SECTION
2 D ---
6.795 ---
5.26E-06 1.234 0.0 0.0 0.0
Toto/ Stup I
CG o f Tendons from bottom
-
- 213.3 4313.6
0.3173
1368.6
Total Stoa 2 1 6 1624.3 1 1438.4 1 155.5

C6 of Tendo& from bottom I I 0.8856 1
1/8th
SPAN
SECTION
I 1 CG of Tendons from bottom I I 0.2867 I
Total Stage 2
C6 of Tendons from bottom
-7 5629.3
0.8284
1349,7
I 1 I 0 5.26E-08 #DIV/OI 1 0.000 1 #DIV/O! I #DIV/O! I #DIV/O!
_ I -
SPAN 5.26E-06 0.826 6.795 0.0 0.0 0.0
SECTfON Toto/ Stap 1 3462.9 7tM.1 484.1
CG of Tendons from bottom 0.1578
SPAN 2 I D 5.26E-06 0.488 6.795 0.0 0.0 0.O

SEGTION TOWStage 1 4596.4 643.5 0.0
CG of Tendons from bottom 0.1400
Total Sf49t 2
Ct o f Tendons from bottom
-, [ 1 1676.7
0.2851
1 470.0 ( 160.5
I 1~ 6 o Tendons
f from bottom 1 I 0.1400 I
I 1 CG o f Tendons from bottom I
FIUC T W O UTERIP3
Design of Sqm!rurbrre
C)No)atlonrUrd:
Yd (m) = Vertical Ordimte o f CaML frwn soff it of dcck
(dsg) = Cwnuhtive angk of deviation in radian from jackity end
Pa = Force at tk critical sect- after tmnsfer (i,e aft= slip at anchomge) (KN)
C. Force in Cables at nodal points after Friction & Slip losses

Component (*) Cable Nu.
1 I 2 1 3 I 4 I 5
CB (rad) 0.00000 ' 0.00000 1.57079 1.57079 1.57079

Z= ( exp )-(vmkzx)
P, = Po * Z (KN)
0 1.00000 0.99541
0.00
--- 0.67195
0.00
0.67195
0.00
0.67195
0.00
pX1 -
-413.03 -413.03 -413.03 -413.03 -413.03
I1Component (") Cable No.

1 2
1 3 I 4 I 5

I
1 I 2 I 3 1
I
4 5
cx (m)
CB (rad) I 2
0.000
0.OaMO
5.224
0.00000
6.425
0.09586
9.431
0.33472
Z= ( w p )-("re*kzx) 1.00000 0.97626 0.94789 0.88068
P,=P,*Z(KN) 2617.73 2555.57 2481.30 2305.38
P,' 2202.14 2264.29 2338.56 2305.38

i
- %
LASA

Component (*) Cable No. , 1
1 2 3 4 5
ZX (4 0.000 9.466 9.526 10.726 11.726
Z8 (rad) 0.00000 0.00000 0.11859 0.11859 0.11859
Z= ( exp )-(Q+kr*) 0 1.00000 0.95739 0.92916 0.92405 0.91981
P, P, * Z (KN) 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
P', 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Span Length = 22.8

0 . Force in Cable at chosen sections after Friction & Slip Losses
n
I
117
- -r $ r
LASA
. -
LASA
F&ruer at Wrur Design of Superstructure
(*) Notations Used :

C x (m) = Cumulative Length of a b l e from jacking end in metres
C0 (rad) = Cumulative angle of deviation in mdian from jacking end
Po = Force at Jacking end before transfer (KN)
P, = Force a t the nodal points before transfer (KN)
:P = Force a t the nodal points after transfer (ICN)

Cumulative Length of Cable from jacking end (in metres) a t various sections (m)
Pf = Fclrce o t the critical s t i o n s before trunsfer (i,tbefore slip6=mge) (IN)
P, = ~orceat the critical wctions after tmrtsftr (i,c after sti* i~nchorage)(~W)
E . Elongation Calculation GripLength= 0.6 m
Elongation (mm) 80.8

px 2617.73 2603.27 2537.99 1 2358.05 2289.64
Cx (ml 3 0.000 1.204 2.206 1 5.211 11.611
I~Iongation(mm) ( I 83.4
LASA
@over at l@mr Design of Superslructure
5.0 CHECK FOR SHEAR & TORSIONAL STRESSES A T VARIOUS SECTIONS

Perm. direct shear stress ; Vt 4.7 Mpa (Table 6 of IRC 18 - 2000)
Perm. shear stress ;Vtu 4.75 Mpa (Table 7 of IRC 18 - 2000)
Total loss in Prestress KN
SHEAR AT DIFFERENT SECTION

d' away from
LOAD I M S V8 V4 3U8 U2
----- - supPo*
---- 2.25 285 5.7 8.55 11.4
1st Stage DL (KN)

-
-. - 208.8
- - -
183.9
-32
110.9 61.3 0.0
2nd Stage bL (KT) - 1421.6 -. -
sIDL (KN) Lz
- 77 2 -. -
Pedestr~anLL (KN)
477
- --0 -
1(11
9
373 279 201
-
Carriageway U (KN) '
h
Total loss in Prestress (KN) 958.5 74 7 10181.5 !C716 10785
I
I
V., = 1.25*DL + 2.0nSIDL + 2.5*LL

A. Check for Umitimg Shear considering 10%extra shear (As per CI. 14.1.5 of IRC: 18-2000)
~aatibn d ' a * a ~
froill V8 V4 3U8 1 Remarks 1
8. Check for Ultimate Shear Capacity & Provision of Shear Reinforcement ..I
I W ~ b n d' away
fnrm
1
V8
I I !
U2 Remarks
s
shear ~ o r c e s
a) Effect~veWldth, b (m)
] hmrt
'1. Ultimate Shear Capacity of Section uncrcrckcd in Flucum (CI. 14.1.2. IRC:18-2000)
[ 0.59 0.415 0.24 0 24 0.24
I
1
b) Overall Depth, d (m) 21I 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
C)Max~mumPrlnc~palTens~leStress, f+ 1.52 Ref. CI 14.1.2, IRC:18
1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52
= 0.24(fck)05 (Mpa)
d) Hor~zontalComponent of prestress
(KN) - 4979.4
2.43
5011.3
3.14
- 5097.4
3.19 3.26
- 5215.1
3.26 Prestress force after

(MP~
f) Effect of Vert~calPrestress, V, all losses cons~dered
297.9 299.24 684.00 13096 0.00
(KN)
g) Shear Capacity, V
, = 1902.5 1443.6 839.3 844.6 845.3
FRICTION O U T W V U
@overat Kgtur Design of Superssrructure
2. Ultimate Shcar Capacity of Section crocked in F l u r e (CI. 14.1.3, IRC:18-2000)

a) Effective Width, b (m) 0.59 0.415 0.24 0.24 0.24 b=(bw-2/3*0)
b) Depth ,db (m) 1.680 1 1.680 1.834 1.921 1.960
c) Effective eccentricity , e(m) 0.861 1 1.020 1.189 1.276 1.315
d) Prestressing factor (l/~+e./&)(m'~) --
1.837 2.619 2.948 3.118 --3.194
Prestress force after
e) Strcss due to prestress. fpt(KN/mZ) 9149 13125 15029 16218
all losses considered
f) Distance of extreme fibre from
1.353 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45
centroid, y, (m)
Ref. 1.0 of this note
g) Second Moment of Area, I(m4) 0.8829 0.7447 0.7447 0.7447 0.7447
h) Cracking Moment, M t (KN.m) =

6301.7 6573.4 7353.1 7840.2 8019.3
Ref. CI 14.1.3, IRC:18 -
(0.37 (f,k)O 5+0.8*f,+).~y 2000
i)Ult. Shear Force, Volt (KN) 2034.3 1930.4 1421.3 989.2 523.3 Ref. 4.0 of this note
j) B. Moment corresponding to Ult.
4754.0 5846.8 9892.4 12285.0 13143.3
Shear Force, Mu,+ (KN.m)
k) Shtar Capacity, Vcr (KN) =
2696.7 2170.4 1056.6 631.4 319.4
0.037bcdb*(f J'.~+MJM*V
I) Design Shear Capacity. Ve (KN) 2M0.4 1742.8 1056.6 631.4 319.4 Lesser of V, dc V,,
LASA
Fijmerot Xgmr *ram Design of PSC T-Glrdcr Supersbvctnre
3.0 CALCULATIONS O f BM and SF far SHUTITRING LOAD CINNER and OUTER GIRDER1
F@werat ICprur (Rpta?y Design of PSC T-Girder Superstmctum
2.0 CALCUlAnONS OF DEAD LOAD BM &SF for Ovrm S;rRDER
2.1 DFAD LOAD CALCUb ATION
A. Weight of Plecast Girrdsr (DL Stape -1)
1:O Self weight of beam =0.8838* 25
2.0 Web thikening at near ends
bdm widening at the Suppmt
2.1 Wt. due to exba widening (uni) =(1.4241-0.8838)*25 -

- 13.5 KN/m
2.2 Wt. due to extra widening (vary)

-- 13.5 to 0 KN/m
n
3.0 Weight of uoss girder to be cwt with LGirder
i
3.1 Intermediate Cross Girder =(1*2.1 - 0.8838 -(1-0.65)*0.25)*0.3*25= 8.5 KN
3.2 End Cross Girder =(1*2.1 - 1.4241 -(I-0.65)*0.25)/2*0.4*25= 2.9 KN
6.D r o f m S ; l b b & X - G i & ( b L m - 2 )

1.0 Weight of Dedc Slab =(1.5+2.5)*0.25*25 -
2.0 Weight of Inner X-Girder =(3-1)*(2.1-0.25)*0.3*25 12 -

3.0 Weight of End XGirder =(3-1)*(2.1-0.25)*0.4*25 12 -
DLLBMMSF/Ou ter LASA

1.0 Self weight of beam = O . m * 25
2 0 Web thikening at new ends
=(1.2616-0.B0gs)*25 . -
2.1 Wt. due to exba widening (uni)
2.2 Wt. due to eha widening (vary)

t?
i 3.0 WelgM of crc#5 girder to be cast wllh L-GIrder
3.1 Intermediate CFoss Gkder =(1*1.85 - 0.8088 -(1-0.65)*0.25)*0.3*25=
3.2 End C m Girder =(1*1.85 - 1.2616 -(1-0.65)*0.25)/2*0.4*25=
rrc DL #--ax- - 2)
1.0 MkbiUd t&k Sbb =3*0.25*25 -
2.0 Weight of Inner XGirder =(3-1)*(1.85-0.25)*0.3*25 -
=(3-1)*(1.85-0.25)*0.4*25 =
3.0 WeigM of End X-Girder
LASA
F l j m at Kamr %?a? Design of PSC T-C;iderSupersimcture
1.2 ClaLCULAnONS OF BENDING MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE FOR INNER GIRDER
1.2.1 pL Staae 1Loadinq
Support Reaction R, = 293.0 KN
Support Reaction RI = 302.4 KN

Fbover at Kurur Qtuly Design of Superstructure
LOAD CASE :- 70-RWHEEL

Effective length of girder= ??.8ni (Centre to centre of bearing )
IMPACT FACTOR = 4.5
6 t 22.8 - 0.15625rn
--
Therefore multiplying factor -

- 1.1 5625
1 SI'WHARY OF REKDTYG HOMEVT 14 (IlTER GIRDER ( W m ) 1
IARY OF SHEAR FORCE W OUTER GIRDER O\W
LOAD CASE :- 70-R WHEEL

- -. -- -
w l ~ ~ , 4 f i 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * 0 ) i ~ ~ t Y h T R G 1- R n E R ~ l i ~ m l
i
Fbover at ?@mr (RPtmy Design of Superstructure
Summary of Bending Moments (KNm)in Inner Girder
Summary of Shear Forces (KN) in Inner Girder
ME~xirnurn
Load C shear Force
SlDL 45.4
FPLL 0
70R(W ) Outer side 219
70R(W ) at Centre 156
n
, Summary of Bending Moments (KNm) in End cross Girder
Summary of Shear Forces (KN) in End cross Girder
M
Load t shw -
SlDL 17.712
FPLL 0
70R(W ) at Centre
SUM-BM-SF-LONG-GIRDkrgirder LASA
Section Properties of Lonqitudinal Members (Inner Girder)
C/C spacing of Bearing

C/C spacing of Longitudinal Girder
C/C spacing of Cross Girder
Distance between C/L of Brg. and C/L of Exp. Joint
Cantilever length
Depth of L-Girder
Thickness of Deck slab
Thickness of Deck slab at Exp. Joint
Grade of Concrete of Deck Slab
-
Inner L Girder at the Span
Member no:-IKnGSP
I
0.225 beff = 1015 + b, = 4.860 m [ CI. 305.15.2 IRC 21 ]
WC Spacing of L-girder = 3.000 m
IrnA;$ *>5.
0.2s
Deck Slab
Modulus of Elasticity of Girder -
-
=
36050 MPa
33721.7MPa
%don Properties of Composite Section

Area za
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y = ~ A . Y I) ZA
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (a) =~IO+A.#).~.Y~
Section Properties of Girder

Area ZA
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =z(A.~)I CA
-!- Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (u) = z(Io+A.#)-~LY~
T-SEC-PROP/Long-Inner USA
Design of Superslruciure
-
Inner L Girder at the Support
Member no:-INTLGSU
1
4.560 m [U.305.15.2 IRC 21 ]
C/C Spacing of L-girder = 3.000 m
Modulus of Elasticity of Deck Slab = 33721.7 MPa

Modulus of Elasticity of Girder - 36050 MPa
I
0.65
Section Properbes of Composite Section

Area rn = 1.9631 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y = ~ A . Y I) z4 = 1.3255 m
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (h)= Z(IO+A. J ) - a y 2 = 0.8470 m4

Area ZA
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y = ~ A . Y I) ~4
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (h)= ~ I O + A . # ) - ~ Y ~
T-SEC-PROP/Long-lnne LASA
SALEM - U R U R SECTION OF NH-7 Design of Sup-R)
BACK UP CALCULATION FOR SlDL FOR STAAD ANALYSIS
i! A
(Outer Ql* )
3
u3
b
"I (Inner girder]
FL.4Y VIEW
J
Wearinp Coat Load
Wearing coat thickness =
Density of W.C =
Load intensity =
For outer girder
Eff width for outer girder =
Loadl m run for outer glmr =
For inner girder
Eff mdth for ouler girder = 3m
Loadl m run for inner girer = 6.6 KNlm
Crash barrier Load
Area of crash barrier = 0.39 m2
Load /m run = 9.36 KNlm
LASA
SALEM - KARUR SECTION OF NH-7 Design c# S u p w s b v m
LASA
-
SALEM KARUR SECTION OF NH-7
Ffjvwa t Kamr Qtary Design of Superstructure
Section Propenlies of Longitudinal Members (Outer Girder)
C/C spacing of Bearing

Distance between C/L of Brg. and C/L of Exp. Joint
Cantilever length
Depth of L-Girder
Grade of Concrete of Deck Slab
-
Outer L Girder at the Span
Member no:-ENOLGSP
h
* *f 3.375 rn
beff = 1015 + b,., = 4.860 m [ CI. 305.15.2 IRC 21 ]

Modulus of Elasticity of Oeck Slab = 33721.7MPa

0.65
Section Properties of Composite Section

Area ZA
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y = ~ A . Y )I M
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (h)= z(Io+A.~~-uv~

Area CA
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =c(A.Y) I 'EA
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (12)= %IO+A.#)-~.Y~
T SEC PROP/Long-Outer .\<

-
Outer L Girder at the Support
Member no:-ENMGSU
4 3 m m
'o 0 befi = 1015 + b = 4.560 m [ a. 305.15.2 IRC 21 ]

Modulus of Elasticity of Deck Slab = 33721.7 MPa

I
&
- - -
Composite M a n
Glrder Only
z
C
----
.
--
2.05082
1.26156
2.77535 4.3682
1.21657
0.271
1.2896 0.2a
4.63875
1.55605
CA uv Lny' XI, ~(I,+A~'I
Section Properties of Composite Section

Area ZA
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =x(~.y)lz4
Moment of inertia of end intermediategirder (IZ)= ~ I O + A .J)-av2
Area ~h
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =WAY)I EA
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (b)= ~IO+A.~)-ZA.Y~
LASA
Section Pro~ertiesof Transverse Members

Distance betweenC/L of Brg. and U L of Exp. Joint
Cantilever length
Depth of CmssGirder
Web thiinea of Inner Crws Glrder
Web thickness of External Cross Girder
Inner Cross Girder

Member no:-INTCG 82 TO 84 92 TO 94 102 TO 104
beff = 1015 + b, [ CI. 305.15.2 IRC 21 ]

= 0.720 m
Area
Distance of q from bottom fibre (y)
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (It)
End Crass Girder
Member no: -EN- 67 TO 69 117 TO 119
beff = 1015 + b,. [ CI. 305.15.2 IRC 21 ]

= 0.820 m
Area
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y)
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (It)
Slab at Exp Joint
Member no: -SLAB1 71 TO 74 127 TO 130
0.6900 m
"~ ~ t & - . - - A 0.400 A
Area
Moment of inertia (13
Torsional moment of inertia (I,)
T-SEC-PROP/Transverse Memb LASA

Cantilever Slab (End of Intermediate Cross Girder)

Member no:-SLAB2 91 94 99 102 107 110
( 0.720 m ,
L
' " +z-t=-.-. 0.29 A
Area
Moment of inertia (I,)
Cantilever Slab (End of End Cross Girder)
Member no:-SLAB3 75 78 123 126
Area
Torsional moment of inertia (IJ
i Slab in b%tw-n Cross Girder
Member no: -SLAW 83 TO 86 95 TO 98 103 TO 106 115 TO 118
< 2.850rn >

" ~=t?-.-. '&'
0.250 A
Area
Slab at the end of Intermediate L Girder -

Member no:-SLAB5 29 4 2
3.000 m
- %,
Area
- I $
.--_.-.-.-.-. -.--
A 0.2w
n Distance of cg from bottom fibre (y)

Moment of inertia (I,)
Torsional moment of inertia (IJ
Slab at the end of End L - Girder
Member no:-SLAB6 15 18 43 $6
3.375 rn
._._.________
Area
__-.
"" "
T-SEC-PROP/Transverse Memb LASA

rl
CALCULATION OF LOADDWE TO TEMPERATURE GRADIENT IN INNER GIRDER

Ai Span At Support
Total Height of the girder

C.G. of Girder from bottom
M.O.I. of the Section
Area of the Section
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete
Section Modulus at the top of Slab

Section Modulus at the top of Girder
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder
1.0 COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO RISE IN TEMPERATURE
I -
r c nnP rfl A n/Inner Girder
A
Design of Superslnclrrre
1.1 STRESSES AT SPAN-SECTION

1
Stresses
due Stress due
Restrained
--
2 0.100 1479.9
3
4 777.0 0.650 776.97 J -1 423.31
i
2274.45 1 634.21 1
1.2 STRESSES AT SUPPORT SECTION
I - .. - - - - -
Stresses 1
I
I
I i ( 1
Assuming due Sfress due
Y to re'ease
segment /
Height e Moment End
Restrained 1 to release Final Stress
of Moment
Lnrpa
1
LASA
J
Design ofSupemtrucrure
2.0 COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO FALL IN TEMPERATURE
I
2.1 STRESSES AT SPAN SECTION
I Stresses
I
Stress Force to release Final Stress
I Restrained
rce
m K N / ~ ~K N / ~ ~
0.307 -481.17 104.63 -2672.1
,-
-259.0 38.47 924.6

1.000 --25.49
32.4 0.36 -0.12 0.467 -0.071 1145.15 /
5 -296.0 1 0.475 -1 4.06 1.533 1 -1.138
4 1 0.250 1 -2441.9 1 0.650 -222.45 1.610 1 -1.215 1145.15 I 3 8 4 r ' -911.9
-1329.95 1 1 -197.06
TEMP- LOAD/lnner-Girder LASA

A.
Design of Supetslmcture
. I Stresses
Segment
-I
Height Stress
I
b Force Y
from top
I
e Moment
1
1
Assuming
End
Restrained
Stress due '
I
'
Of Axial
Force
Stress due
to release Final Stress
of Moment
I m KN/m2 m KN A- m m KNm K N / K N / ~~ ~
-392 1.9 3.000 -1567.82 0.088-. 0.797
-259.0 -
- - 1 .OOOo.00 0.250 0.636 0.00
0.225 -259.O 'Jxlo -
-25.49 0.314 0.571 -14.57 -258.99
-- 1454.72
- - 4 7 -0:025 32.4 0.650
-- - -0.26-- 0.467 0.419 -0.1 1 -- 32.37 1454.72
5 - 0.200 -296.0 0.650 -1 9.24 1 533 -0.648 12.46 .-- -295.99
-.
-244 1.91
1454.72 1
I 454.72-1 2747.55
I
I
4 0.250 -2441060.650 -222.45 1 -610 -0.724 161.10 1760.4

-1835.27 1 -1090.99 J
LASA
,4
Design of Supemtructure
CALCULATION OF LOAD DUE TO TEMPERATURE GRADIENT IN OUTER GIRDER

At Span At Support
Total Height of the girder

C.G. of Girder from bottom
M.O.I. of the Section
Area of the Section
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete
Section Modulus at the top of Slab

Section Modulus at the top of Girder
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder
1.0 COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO RISE IN TEMPERATURE
.,
Section of Girder at Section of Girder atFSuppwl
I ' r
I
,
\'
. ' 5\ i
- -
-
1, /
'\*' 8
h.
.I
I **
1.1 SI'RESSFS AT SPAN SECTION
I Stresses
Assuming Stress due
-
.
-I6585 76
1 479.95
--- 88757 - -31 47.49
37.88 1 1.800 ? -0.897 ] -33.97 776.97 -3147.49 , 5984.94 i 3614.4
.2545.69 ] [ 2012.05
! ="+
1
- 1
1
Stresses
1
1 Assuming
1
due Stress due
to re'ease
" ;*"I
Height Stress b to release Final Stress
1
'OrCe
Segment Reszd of
,
m KN/~' m KN K N ~ K N / ~ , -
1 -.-
0.150 6585.8 3.375-2041.63 0.059 0.827 - 1 1687.46 1 6585.76 -- -2017.83 -4670.48
---- -102.6
0.100 1479.9 3 3 7 5 39-1[7196 275.66 1479.95 -2017.83 -3352.18 -3890.1
2
3 0.150 1
1
888.0 1 .OOO 66.60 - 0.300 &: 3951 887.97 -201 7.83
4 0.150 777.0 0.650 , 37.88 0.437 0.448 16.98 776.97 -2017.83 I 5084.96 3844.1 ,
1 2545.69 1 2019.1 1
LASA
'I:
2.0 COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO FALL IN TEMPERATURE
I
2.1 STRESSES AT SPAN SECTION
1
I Height 1 Stress I Assuming
End
St"Ss
Stresses
1
due Stress due 1
to re'ease to release Final Stress
Segment
m 1 XNrn
1
4 2504.85 3825.18 3888.1

-2025.92 1 1 -1285.97 ( <
TEMP- LOAD/Outer-Girder LASA

1 Stresses I
I
Stress aue
Segment
1 Height e Moment
Assuming
to release
Of
Stress due
to release Final Stress
of Moment
m KN m
3.375 -1763.79 1 0.088 ' 0.797 -1406.1 1 -392 1.86 1610.06 2884.99 --
R Kg I -259.0
-259.0
1::
,
-25.49 1 0.314
, - 0.00
I -14.57
-258.99
-258.99 I
1610.06
1610.06
2070.66
-
LASA
%-
CABLE COOROINATES
Y and Z Coordinates at distance ' x ' from centre of cable in mm Span 25
LASA
USA
CABLE COORDINAES
y Coordinates at distance 'x' fronr crrrhv of cable in mm
USA
416 Laning of Karur-Madurai Sect~onof NH-7
Consultancy Services for Feasibility study and Preparat~onof DPR
Clause
-
SECTION 2800 REPAIR OF STRUCTURES
2809 DISMANTLING OF CONCRETE WEARING COAT
Rename the clause as:
Dismantling of Existing ConcretelBituminous Wearing Coat, Expansion

Joints
2809.1 Commencement of dismantling
Add as sub para (i) as below
(i) The concrete wearing coat as well as the bituminous overlay shall be
removed from the existing bridges.
Renumber the sub para (i), (ii), (iii) as (ii), (iii) & (iv)
2809.2 This Clause shall read as follows:
The removal operations shall be carried out mechanically using pavement

breakers and compressors. Removal shall be done carefully to avoid damage to
any part ol' the existing structure. In dclicate Locations for example around spouts,
which will continue to serve as rain water spouts, removal shall be done by
manual methods. After removal, the concrete deck surface shall be closely
inspected for identifyins any distress such as cracks. pockets of loose or
honeycombed concrete etc. The deck surface shall be thorou_rhlycleaned with
special errnns to remove any loose material, Expansion joints and spouts shall be
removed carefully so that deck concrete is not damaged.
2809.3 Precautions during dismantling work
Add the following at the end.
Dismantlcd macerial shall not he stacked on the deck nor shall i t be thrown below
the bridge. 11 shall be neatly piled at points designated try the Engineer with all
lifts and lead upto 1IK)Om. Materials. which can hc used or auctioned, shall he
stored in near piles at locations desimated hy the Engineer wit11all lifis and lead
upto 2000m.
2812 Measurement for Payment
Add the following to the end of the Clause.
g) Dismantling of wearing coat shall be measured in cubic metre of volume of the

wearing coat dismantled.
2813 Rate
Add the following to the end of the Clause.
The contract unit rate for dismantling the wearing coat shall include the cost of all
materials, labour, tools and plant, traffic management, signage, safety precautions
<-cT.>,
.- -
.#.\
,f\
Technical Spec~ficat~ons . ,--- Rehablhlat~onof Exlst~ngBr~dges

Contract Package NS 80
416 Laning of Karur-Madurai Section of NH-7
Consultancy Services for Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR
Clause
and other incidental expenses including removal of existing expansion joints for
the satisfactory completion of the work as per these specifications.
The following new clauses shall be added.
2814 DISMANTLING OF DAMAGED STRUCTURES AND/OR PART OF

EXISTING STRUCTURES
The work shall be executed in accordance with Standard Specifications section

200 clause 202. All damaged concrete brick worWstone work in coping wing
walls, returns, piers and abutment and caps shall be thoroughly inspected to
identify the extent of dismantling. The decision of the Engineer shall be final.
Care shall be taken to avoid damage to any part of the existing structure.
Dismantling work for part of deck slab railing and kerbs shall be done carefully
such that the existing reinforcement, which will project into the new work, is not
damaged or lost. Reinforcement shall be cleaned thoroughly.
Dismantled material shall not be stacked on the deck nor shall it be thrown below
the bridge. It shall be neatly piled at points designated by the Engineer with all
lifts and lead upto 1000m. Materials, which can be used or auctioned, shall be
stored in neat piles at locations designated by the Engineer with all lifts and lead
upto 2000m.
Water shall be sprayed to reduce the dust while the dismantling work is in
progress. Dismantling work shall not be camed out at night, during storms or
heavy rain.
Goggles and gas masks shall be worn at the time of dismantling. Leather gloves
shall be worn by the workers. Screens made of G.I. sheets shall be placed
wherever necessary to prevent the disintegrated pieces from flying.
Damage caused to any component of the bridge structure during removal

J operations shall be restored by the Contractor at his cost. The service lines, if any,
shall be disconnectedldiverted before dismantling work commences.
/-
2814.1 Dismantling of existing railings, kerbs, footpath slabs, approach slabs and
damaged concrete in wing wallslreturns, piers and abutments
Railing, kerbs, concrete (P.C.C.) parapet erected in place of damaged railing,

footpath slabs, approach slabs and damaged concrete in wing walls/returns, piers
and abutments of the existing structures shall be dismantled as shown in drawing
or as directed by the Engineer.
2814.2 Dismantling of existing deck slab
The depth of cutting ofthe existing deck slab shall be as shown in the drawings.
Dismantling shall be done in accordance with Standard Specification section
200.
Technical Specifications Rehabilitation of Existing Bridges

Contract Package NS 80 2
4/6 Laning of Karur-Madurai Section of NH-7
Consultancy Services for Feasibility mudy and Preparation of DPR
Clause
2814.3 Dismantling of existing damaged stonelbrick masonry in pier, abutment,

wing walls/returns, parapet, etc.
Damaged stonehricks masonry in pier, abutment, wing wallslreturns and all

stonelbrick parapets shall be dismantled as shown in drawings or as directed by
the Engineer.
2814.4 Dismantling of existing wing wall for construction of adjacent one lane
bridge - a) StonelBrick masonry, b) Concrete
Part of existing stonebrick masonry/concrete wing wall shall be dismantled for

construction of adjacent 1 lane bridge as shown in drawings and Specification
clause 2814 above or as directed by the Engineer.
Measurement for Payment
The work of dismantling structures shall be paid for in units by talung

measurements before and after as applicable
i) Railing and kerb together linear metre
ii) Footpath slab square metre
ii) Approach slab cubic metre
iii) Dismantling bricWstone masonry1
concrete (plain & reinforced) cubic metre
Rate
The contract unit rate for the various items of dismantling shall be paid in full for
carrying out the required operations including full compensation for all labour,
materials, tools, equipment, safeguards and incidentals necessary to complete the
work. These will also include excavation and backfilling where necessary to the
required compaction and for handling, salvaging, piling and disposing of the
dismantled materials within all lifts and up to a lead of 1000m
2815 PROVIDING NEW WEARING COAT WITH PROFILE CORRECTIVE

COURSE FOR NEW CROSS CAMBER 1/60
In order to have a cross slope of 1/60 in all existing bridges whether the cross-
section is retained or widened, profile corrective course of Semi-Dense
Bituminous Concrete (SDBC) shall be laid over the stmctural deck slab after the
top has been exposed by removing the existing wearing coat (refer to clause
2809). The existing wearing coat will be basically of PCC with or without surface
reinforcement, but can also have top bituminous overlay, which had been
provided subsequently as a leveling course.
The profile corrective course of SDBC of variable thickness has to be laid over
the existing carriageway. For T girder bridges, which are not being widened, the
maximum thickness of profile corrective course will be at the existing Centre
Line. For slab bridges, which are being widened, the maximum thickness of
profile corrective course will be at the kerb toward the central verge because of
unidirectional camber.
Clause
Slab bridges are being widened with slab extensions. The top of extended slab
will have a cross slope of 1/60 and no profile corrective course will be required
for the widenedtextended portion of the slab bridge.
A tack coat confirming to standard specification clause 503 shall be applied over
the exposed surface of deck slab before the application of SDBC. In addition,
tack coat has to be provided on new concrete surface of widened portion.
The SDBC shall follow standard specification clause 508.
Bituminous concrete confirming to standard specification clause 509 shall be laid

as component of wearing coat over the SDBC in the existing bridge portion and
directly over concrete on the new widened concrete slab. Tack coat has to be
provided on new concrete surface.
The Mastic Asphalt (MORTH specification clause no. 515) shall be overlaid as
the other component of wearing coat on the bituminous concrete.
The profile corrective course (PCC) shall be measured in cubic metres, as running
continuously through. The tack coat shall not be measured. The work of wearing
coat shall be measured in square metres.
Rate
The contract unit rate for profile corrective course shall include the cost of tack
coat and shall also cover cost of all materials, labour, tools, plant and equipment
required for mixing, transporting and placing in position, vibrating and
compacting and finishing as per this section or as directed by the Engineer,
including all incidental expenses, sampling and testing, quality assurance and
supervision.
2816 REINSTATING THE EXISTING DAMAGED HANDRAILS, KERBS, etc
For repair of kerb, raillrailing post etc., cement sand mortar (1:3) shall be applied.
Missing reinforcement if any shall be compensated before application of mortar.
Damaged rails of the railing shall be replaced by rails of same size and
reinforcement as given in MORTH drawings. Both the above operations shall be
done as per relevant provisions of MORTH specification clause 2703.3 &
2703.4
The measurement shall be done in linear metres of railings repaired.
Rate
The contract unit rate shall include the cost of all labour, materials, tools and
plant, scaffolding and all incidental expenses, sampling and testing and
supervision as described in these specifications.
- . .,. - .
I..
,. .. ,
.. ., I<-.-i
. . . I
. ..-d
' '1
,
, I : /
Technical Specificnr~nna . . ' % : Rehabnitation of Exlsting Bridges
Clause
2817 PROVISION OF NEW DRAINAGE SPOUTS AND REPAIR OF

EXISTING DRAINAGE SPOUTS
a) Provision of new drainage spouts:
For all existing bridges that are being widened and changed to uni-directional
camber drainage spouts shall be provided as shown in the drawings.
The work of new drainage spout shall be executed in accordance with Standard
Specification Section 2700 Clause 2705
Measurement for payment

The measurement for provision of new drainage spouts shall be done in number
of drainage spouts provided.
Rate
The contract unit rate for each drainage spout shall include the cost of all labour,
material, tools and plant required for completing the work as per the
specifications. It shall also include the cost of closure of existing drainage spouts
and providing flow drainpipes with all fixtures up to the point of ground drains
wherever shown on the drawings.
b) Closure and sealing of existing drainage spouts:
The work shall be done aAer the wearing coat is removed. The grating shall be
dismantled and the existing spouts shall be removed carefully with minimum
damage to surrounding concrete.
The pocket formed shall be sufficiently large to ensure good flow and compaction
of concrete in the hole. The area around the spout covered by the grating shall be
provided with PMC sluny.
Before commencing application of PMC sluny brush topping, the prepared

concrete substrata shall be thoroughly soaked with clean water. Before priming it
should be ensured that any free surface water is removed. The material shall be
applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Suitable steel rods
shall be placed vertically in the drainage spout and then concreting shall be done
in the hole. And then the steel shall be embedded in the concrete poured over the
grating area.
The specifications for polymer modified cementitious topping & mortar shall be
as per of Special Specifications A-3 (1.7)
Measurement for payment

The closure of drainage spouts shall not be measured.
Rate
The rate for such closing shalI be deemed to have been included in the cost of
new drainage spouts provided in the widened portion.
Techn[c,~lSpcc~ficar~anr -- k M i l i t a t ran nf Etsrlng Bndge*

/
,
Con~nztPacknp SS RT1
416 Laning of Kanu-Madurai Sectlon of NH-7
Cansultancy Services for Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR
Clause
c) Extension of existing drainage spouts
For bridges that are not being widened, the existing drainage spouts are to be
retained with minor repairs. The work shall be carried out as shown in the
drawing. The concrete surrounding the spout in the sofflt of the slab shall be
chipped out. An extension collar of specified size shall be attached to the existing
pipe as shown in the drawing. The chipped out area shall then be filled with 1:4
cement sand mortar over which a lOmm thck layer of PMC repair mortar shall
be applied.
Drainage spout repair shall be measured in numbers.
Rate
The contract unit rate for each drainage spout shall include the cost of all labour,
material, tools and plant required for completing the work as per these
Specifications. It shall also include the cost of providing flow drainpipes in girder
bridges with all fixtures up to the point of ground drains wherever shown on the
drawings.
2818 REPAIR TO HONEYCOMBED, SPALLED CONCRETE
Honey combed, spalled concrete should be cleaned and cleared (plaster removed)
before the start of repair operation. If necessary, should be cleaned vigorously
with wire brush.
The work shall be executed in accordance with standard Specification Section

2800 and special Specification A 3 (1.4 & 1.5).
Measurement for application of PMC mortar for specified thickness shall be per
square metre of surface area of application.
Rate
The contract unit rate for application of PMC mortar for specified thickness
including cement mortar 1:4 wherever required, shall include cost of all materials,
labour, tools and plant, placing in position, testing and other incidental expenses
including surface preparation for the satisfactory completion of the work as per
these specifications and as shown in the drawings.
2819 SEALING OF CRACKS IN CONCRETE
The work is to seal all cracks in slab, girders and substructures.
The work shall be executed in accordance with Standard Specification Section

2800 Clause 2803,2804 and Special Specification A-3 (1.1 & 1.2).
h
Techn~calSpec~fical~ons Rehab~btatlonof Ex~st~ng
Brldges
.) ,
416 Laning of Kmr-Madurai Section af NH-7
Consultancy Servicesf o r Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR
Clause
Fine Crack: Measurement for sealing of fine crack by application of PMC

mortar for specified thickness along with application of PMC sluny for proper
bondage of old concrete and PMC mortar shall be linear metre of crack.
Wide crack: Measurement for sealing of cracks and injection shall be made by
weight of cement consumed in kg for cement grouting.
For provision of nipples required for grouting, the payment shall be for number of
nipples inserted.
Rate
Fine crack:The contract unit rate for application of PMC mortar for specified
thickness shall include cost of all materials, labour, tools and plant, placing in
position, testing and other incidental expenses including surface preparation for
the satisfactory completion of the work as per these specifications and as shown
in the drawings.
Wide crack: The contract unit rate for sealing of cracks and injection of cement
grout shall include cost of all materials, labour, tools and plant, placing in
position, testing, curing and other incidental expenses for the satisfactory
completion of the work as per these specifications.
Injection nipples are being paid separately.
2820 VOIDS IN SOFFIT OF GIRDER
Portions of the sofits of the girder wherever voids an anticipated shall be

chipped off so that films forming external soflit surface are removed exposing the
reinforcement. Loose concrete sticking with the reinfomcment shall be removed
using appropriate tool and equipment. Polymer modi lied concrete 1lcmm thick
shall be applied and after thal cement plaster 1 :? shall he applied so as to have the
entire sofflt in one straight line.
The work shall be executed in accordance with Special Specification A-3 (1.3)
Measurements for reshaping of soffit of girder with PMC and Cement Plaster
(1:4) shall be square metre of surface area of application.
Rate
The conlract unit raze for application of PMC mortar for specified thickness shall
include cost OF all materials, lahour, tools and plant. placing in position, testing
and other incidental expenses including surface preparation for the salisfactory
completion of'the work as per these specifications and as shown in the drawines.
. --
. ,.
. .
(.
, ,.
.--- .,' '
.
.
\;.
.-,, I
-- . I:;
, ' 8
Technical Specifications I\, . , Rehnh~lil:>!~nn
o f F;r;~a~ng
Br!dtcs
."1.'1 7
Contract Package NS 80 ' :-., ,.' ,/,: . .
- -
L-
416 Laning of Kanu-Madurai Section of NH-7
Consultancy Sewlces for Feasibility audy and Preparation of DPR
Clause
2821 SEALING OF WIDE CRACKS AT JUNCTION OF WING WALL AND
ABUTMENT WITH BRICK BATS AND FINISHING WITH 1:3 CEMENT
MORTAR
Wide cracks of different degree/extent due to separation of masonry/PCC

substructure such as wing wall abutments etc. shall be sealed by cement grout
aAer filling the gap followed by the application of sealing material. The work
shall be executed in conformity with Standard Specification Section 2800
Clause 2806 and Special Specification A-3 (1.2). Gaps shall be sealed by filling
sized stonesibrick bats and finishing with cement plaster (1:3).
Measurements for sealing of cracks and injection shall be made by weight of

cement consumed in kg for cement grouting. For provision of nipples required for
grouting, the payment shall be for number of nipples inserted.
Rate
The contract unit rate for sealing of gap, cracks and injection of cement grout
shall include cost of all material including the gap filling material, labour, tools
and plant, placing in position, testing, curing and other incidental expenses for the
satisfactory completion of the work as per these specifications.
The work is to repair spalls or loss of cover in abutment, pier substructure and
gaps. This shall be executed in accordance with standard Specilication Section
2807 and special Specification A 3 (1.6 (a) & (b)) and 1.7

Measurement for guniting shall be square metre of area of application.
Rate
The contract unit rate for guniting shall cover cost of all materids. I a b t ~ rtooIs.
,
plant. placing in position. testing. curing and surface preparation and other
incidental expenses for thc satisfactory completion of work as per specification. It
shall also include the cost of the provision of steel weld mesh as per specification.
2823 PROVIDING AND INSERTING NIPPLES FOR CEMENT INJECTIONS
The work shall include providing and inserting nipples with approved fixing
compound after drilling holes, and after operation, cutting and removing nipples
and sealing the holes.
Measurement for Payment for making provision of nipples required for grouting
shall be for number of nipples inserted.
"'
8
. .
-.,. ..-,
Rehabilitation of Existing Bridge
-r,.L,;.-l C-ificaIifinr
.L .
,
':
,
:?'
. .
.
Contnct Packap NS 80
- -
4/6 Laning of Karur-Madurai Section of NH-7
Consultancy Senrims for Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR
Clause
Rate
The rate will include cost of cement nipples, admixture fixing compound, all
material and labour in drilling fvring and cutting after the job and removal and
sealing the holes including the cost of drilling equipment, cost of drill, bits and
spares wastage etc.
2824 CASTING OF APPROACH SLAB WITH M-30 GRADE CONCRETE
Approach slabs are to be provided for the new widened camageway of bridges.
In addition, approach slabs, which are cracked or otherwise damaged, shall be
recast.
The work shall be executed in accordance with Standard Specification Section

2700 Clause 2704. The approach slab shall be laid over lean concrete as per
drawing. The base shall be consolidated by ramming with water.
The measurement shall be in cubic metre.
Rate
The contract unit rate for approach slab shall include the cost of all labour,
material, tools and plant and other cost necessary for completion of the work as
per these Specifications. The rate for base shall include cost of all labour,
material, tools and plant required, including preparation of surface and
consolidation complete in all respects
2825 EXPANDED METAL SHEET
Expanded metal sheet of size 75 mm x 200 rnm, 3.25 nun wide and 3.15 mm
thick @ 2.141 kg1sq.m shall be provided over the steel plate placed at the
expansion joint and welded.

This provision of expanded metal sheet shall not be measured and shall be
deemed to have been included in the cost of provision of expansion joints.
Rate
The contract unit rate shall include provision, placing in position of the sheet as
per drawing and specifications, and welding also.
Technical Specifications Rehabilitalion of Existing Brldges

Contract Package NS 80 9
416 Laning of Km-Madurai Section of NH-7
Clause
SPECIAL SPECIFICATIONS
A-3 REPAIR PROCEDURE, UPGRADATION AND MATERIAL

SPECIFICATION.
Various types of distress in concrete superstructure and substructure manifesting in

the formation of horizontal cracks, vertical cracks and spalling are generally
observed. The constructional inadequacy in the form of honeycombing and spalling
of soffit concrete near drainage spout outlet are also found.
Apart from these, the bridges are to be provided with uni-directional camber, crash
barriers in lieu of railing and new expansion joints specially when the slab bridges are
widened.
For various types of defects, the repair methodology, its procedure and the material
specification and the specification and procedure for providing new expansion joint,
crash bamer and wearing coat are outlined in the succeeding Para.
1 . FINE CRACKS
There can be fine visible cracks in bridges. If the cracks are 0.5mrn wide or less, these
cracks are to be repaired with PMC mortar. The location of the cracks can be seen
during repair and widening works. In order to avoid increase in corrosion,
rectification of the cracks by cutting grooves in the concrete and sealing the grooves
with PMC repair mortar after cleaning and applying PMC sluny on the freshly cut
surfaces at all locations is recommended.
Procedure
The size of the groove, which should be cut along the whole length of visible cracks,
shall be 20 x 1Omrn. Depth of the groove is lOmm while the width of the groove is
20mm, which however, should be symmetrically placed along the crack. In case
reinforcement is met within a depth of 6- the depth should be limited to the depth
of the reinforcement from the surface. It is preferable to cut the groove
pergendicularly to the surface but a deviation of 15 degrees in either direction may be
permitted.
After cutting the groove it shall be cleaned properly to ensure a dust free clean
surface and a coating of PMC sluny be applied over the freshly cut surfaces.
The PMC repair mortar shall be used to fill the 20 x lOmm groove while the slurry
coating is still wet, after a lapse of 30 minutes from the time of application of the
slurry, the PMC repair mortar shall be applied and compacted to ensure complete
filling of the groove. The filling up of the groove shall be finished flush with the
existing concrete surface. After the finishing operation, the filled up groove should
be properly covered with impermeable sheet whose edges are to be sealed by taping.
Curing of the finished surface will be the same as that stated for curing of PMC repair
mortar (See C1.1.7). Care should be taken to cut the groove with sharp edge
instrument to avoid damage to the structure.
9
-',
Tcchn~c~l I-. ,
Spet~ficat~c~m ; I / Rehabtliiat~onof Ex~stingBridges
4/61 Laning of Karur-Madurai Sect~onof NH-7
Clause
Material Specrfication
Specification of PMC material is provided at 1.1.7.
1.2 WIDE CRACKS
Wide cracks having width more than 0.5 rnm have been found in some of the bridge
components. Moreover, these wide cracks are also found in MasonryIPCC
substructure, such as wing walls, abutments and piers. While locating them and to
repair specially the wing walls, it is to be decided whether the old wing wall will be
functional after widening, if so they need to be repaired.
The basic repair methodology consists of injection of cement grout in the wide cracks
after most of the visible gaps have been sealed by applying sealing mortars. The
repair should be in conformation with clause 2806 of MORTH specification.
However, the general procedure is briefly described.
Procedure
The wide gaps should be chased so that grooves are formed which may be 10 x 5 m m
in size. After cleaning the surface with wire brush and compressed air, 15mm dia
nipples are to be fixed in 150 - 200mm deep holes with suitable sealing material.
The nipples should have maximum spacing 500 - 600mm. The chased groove also
should be filled up with suitable sealing material. Neat cement along with soluble
glass (Sodium Nitrate) forms excellent quick setting sealing compounds.
Grouting of cement sluny should be done by mechanical pumps. The details of

procedure should be in conformity with clause 2806 of MORTH specification except
for sub clause 2806.6.
Material Specrfcation
Material specification should be in accordance with clause 2806.1 of MORTH

specification.
1.3 REPAIR OF VOIDS IN GIRDER SOFFIT
In case of voids in the girder soffits are identified, the repair technique shall be as
folloats. T h e repair shall be done by law permeability polymer modified cement
repair mortar. The thickness ofthe PMC repair mortar shall be limited to 15 mm. For
repairing voids more than I 5 mm. the lowcr!inner layer should be filled with cement-
sand mortar F :4 prior to application of PMC repair mortar.
Portions of the soffits of the girders to be repaired are to be chipped off, so that the
film forming the external soffit surface are removed exposing the reinforcement. All
loose concrete sticking with !he reinforcement shall be removed using appropriate
tools and equipment.
Depending on the depth of voids, cement sand mortar 1:4 is to be applied, before the
application of PMC mortar 15mm thick so that the soffit of the girder is in a straight
line i.e., the soffit should not have protrusion or depressions.
All concrete film in the soffit of girders and weak concrete sticking to the
reinforcement w i l ? b # p a y e d by using appropriate tools and equipment. Where the
I
Techn~calSpeclficat~ons of Existlng Brldges

R~Rah~lltatlon
Consultancy S e ~ c e sfor Feasibility study and Preparat~onof DPR
Clause
reinforcement bars are exposed, the brealung shall continue so as to expose half the
diameter prior to &her treatment.
Reinforcemenl Preparation
All exposed reinforcement shall be cleaned in accordance with the following:
a) Where exposed reinforcement is sound and does not show any signs of heavy
corrosion or pitting other than typical rusting, it shall be mechanically
cleaned to remove rust and loose mill scale.
b) Where exposed reinforcement shows signs of heavy corrosion deterioration,

it shall be cleaned by grit blasting or by proprietary rust removing compound.
Reinforcement Priming
Within one hour of preparing and cleaning, the reinforcement shall be coated with a
primer. The primer shall be PMC sluny using Tapecrete P1.51 as polymer latex or
approved equivalent polymer latex.
The primer shall be brush applied on to the cleaned reinforcement ensuring that the
full surface area is in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation.
Concrete Suflace Priming for Bond
Before commencing to apply PMC repair mortar or the inner cement sand mortar, the
prepared concrete substrata shall be thoroughly soaked with clean water. Free surface
water shall be removed before priming. The primer shall be PMC slurry using MIS
CICO Technologies Ltd.'s Tapecrete P 151 polymer Iatex or approved equivalent.
The priming agent shall be well worked into the irregularities according to the
manufacturer's recommendations.
The repair material should be applied before the priming agent sets. The area coated
as one time must be restricted to allow for this provision and any area, which
becomes set shall be recoated as per manufacturer's instruction.
Cementitious Repair Mortar
The repair mortar shall be high build polymer modified cementitious repair mortar.
The PMC repair mortar shall be of appropriate general specification for use in vertical
and overhead application.
The total thickness of mortar shall be applied in one layer not exceeding 15mm
without sagging or slumping. The material shall be applied in accordance with the
manufacturer's recommendations.
The mixing shall be carried out using forces action mixes or with slow speed drive
mixer (400 - 500 rpm) fitted with a spiral paddle. In no circumstances shall water be
used in the PMC repair mortar mix. Re-mixing and re-tampering shall not be
permitted.
The material shall be applied by gloved hand or trowel to the prepared and primed
surface of the s u b s t y l y ~ eand be well worked inside paying particular attention to
Techn~calSpecf~cat~ons ab~litatlonof Ex~stingBridges

Contract Package NS 80 --
Clause
paclung behind and between the reinforcement. In order to make up the total height
of the girder up to the original soffit level, the balance portion of the girder depth
shall be made up with 1:4 cement sand plaster. Refer to Para 1.7.1 for specifications
of PMC mortar i.e., special specification 1.7
1.4 SPALLING OR HONEYCOMBING IN DECK SLAB WITH LIGHT

EXPOSURE OF REINFORCEMENT
(Less than half the diameter of reinforcement visible or discolouration of soffit)
For some bridges, spalling and honeycombing have been observed specially near the
drainage waterspout. The basic repair for this defect is to provide a 5 to 8 mrn thick
PMC repair mortar layer after removing the loose concrete, plaster etc. The peripheral
edge may be cut upto lOmm deep and the material removed to give a proper
demarcation line. If such spalling or honeycombing is observed in the cantilevered
portion of deck of girder bridges, a drip course covered with PMC repair mortar may
be provided to stop the back flow of rainwater.
Procedure
The honeycombed/spalled surface after removing plaster, if any, should be cleaned

vigorously with steel wire brush. PMC slurry coat should be provided on the
prepared surface after the surface has been pre-wetted with water. The surface should
be moist but without any free water. For hrther details refer to "Concrete surface
priming for Bond" and "Cementitious Repair Mortar" under Para 1.7 ante.
A drip course 10 x 12 rnrn size is to be formed at the outer edge of the soffit of the
cantilevered deck slab. PMC repair mortar Smm thick shall be applied on the drip
course. Refer to Para 1.7 for details of specification of PMC materials.
1.5 SPALLING OR HONEYCOMBING IN DECK SLAB WITH HEAVY

EXPOSURE OF REINFORCEMENT
(More than haff the diameter of reinforcement visible)
This type of distress has been observed in couple of bridges. The large spalling might
have been initiated due to honeycombing, a bad construction defect. In many cases,
inadequate length of drainage spout has been responsible for wetting the locality with
drained rainwater and in addition due to the growth of vegetation. This happens
particularly in pier caps.
The repair technique suggested is the application of Cement Sand mortar 1:4, before
the application of PMC mortar 15mm thick so that the soffit is in a straight line.
Procedurefor Repair
All concrete film in the soffit and weak concrete sticking to the reinforcement shall be
removed by using appropriate tools and equipment. Where the reinforcement bars are
exposed, the breaking shall continue so as to expose half the diameter prior to fkther
treatment. PMC sluny shall be applied over the prepared surface. Afier application of
PMC slurry, the repair shall be carried out as per section 1.3
. 8
,
,'
-
I -
=!
Techniul Sgcr!ficxinn?
Contad Packape NS RO
.1
----- -
\yO
1s PC.'-+
Rehabtlttat~onof Ex~stingBridges
A * , )r
416 Laning of Kmr-Madurai Section of NH-7
Clause
1.6 PIER AND ABUTMENT SUBSTRUCTURE AFFECTED BY WEATHERING
AND LOSS OF POINTINGlPLASTER
Generally, there are no cases where these defects have been identified. However,
during the construction period, if the defects are noticed, the following methodology
shall be used for repairing the same.
Case (a) Weathering
Bmic Principles
Guniting or shotcreting of affected portion of masonry of abutment and pier is being

suggested in such cases. (Guniting and shotcreting are the two different names for the
same operation)
The purpose of guniting of the bridge is to increase its life from general weathering
and for counteracting weathering effects also. There are distinct weathering signs in
the old masonry/cement concrete substructure portion.
The guniting thickness for vertical faces of substructure should be at least 40mm and
should be strengthened by providing a steel weld mesh 50 x 50 x 10 gauge all along
vertical faces of substructure.
Procedure
The steel wire mesh has to be placed in position keeping the mesh within 10 - 15rnm
from the surface, which will be curved for the cutwater portion. Suitable fixing pins
are to be inserted between the masonry mortar joint so that the mesh can be kept in
proper position. The inserts can even be spaced quite apart but ensuring that the weld
mesh is not disturbed during guniting, which is also termed as shotcreting.
Depending on the expertise of the guniting personnel, the thickness of 40rnm may be
built in one layer but it must be ensured that no void is created behind the gunite built
up thickness. The presence of void can be found by hollow hammering sound after
the gunite has attained strength say after 3 days.
Material Specification
For details and specification of gunite refer to clause 1.8
Case @) Loss of Pointing/Plaster
For loss of pointingfplaster cement mortar 1:3 will be used on exposed surface after
removal of old plaster/pointing and preparation of surface thereof.
- ..
Rehabilitation of Existing Bridges

Technical Specifications
Contract Package NS 80 t 3
Consultancy Senices for Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR
Clause
1.7 SPECIFICATION FOR MATERIALS AND MIX FORMULATIONS FOR
PMC MATERIAL SYSTEM
The acrylic polymer latex to be used for system shall be TAPECRETE P 151
manufactured by MIS CICO Technologies Ltd. Equivalent products of M/s FOSROC
and M/s SIKA are also acceptable.
1.7.1 Specification for Acrylic Polymer Latex
The polymer latex, which is to be used, should consist of water based acrylic and
copolymer dispersion and special purpose chemicals. (TAPECRETE Pl5l of MIS
FRC Composites (I) Pvt. Ltd. or any approved equivalent may be used for this
+
purpose). The polymer solid contents shall be 30 1 percent. The particles shall be
nearly spherical shape with a diameter of 0.35 -+ 0.05 micrometer. The manufacturer
shall certify to the above requirements about solid content and grain size. In order to
keep control over the quality, the manufacturer shall provide infrared absorption
spectrum analysis for the materials (polymer latex) to be supplied to them.
The integral waterproofing compound which is to be used for underlying layer of

cement sand mortar shall conform to IS: 2645 No. 1 manufactured by M/s Structural
Waterproofing Co. Pvt. Ltd, or approved equipment.
Portland Cement conforming to IS: 8112 shall be used for production of polymer
modified cement repair mortar and polymer modified cementitious coating system,
which is to be used as a bonding medium with concrete substrate.
Tapecrete P151, an acrylic polymer latex shall be used as the polymer for modifying
and improving the properties of cement. The same product is to be used for various
purposes such as in a sluny form with cement to form a bonding/priming medium and
with sand to firm PMC repair mortar. However, no additional water is to be added to
PMC slurry or PMC repair mortar as the water which is present in the latex is
sufficient for cement hydration and for this reason the latex cement ratio remains
constant for all applications.
The sand, which is to be used for constituting the PMC repair mortar, should be Silica
sand as the basic material, which is categorized in two groups:
a) Coarse Silica Sand

b) Fine Silica
The grading of the above groups should follow the limits provided below: -
IS Sieve No. Percentage Passing by weight

Coarse Fine Combined
10 mm 100 100 100
4.75mm 95 - 100 100 98 - 100
2.36mm 90 - 100 100 80 - 100
1.18mm 40 - 60 100 70 - 80
600 micron 0 - 10 90 - 100 45 - 55
300 micron 0-4 40 - 60 10-30
150 micron 0-3 0 - 10 0-5
75 micron 3 max 0-3 3 max
1 L n
/<
Techn~calSpec~ficat~ons /.- Rehablhtat~onof Exlst~ngBr~dges
12, - 15
Contract Pukage NS 80
I .
, . ,
'
,
. \'.
4.
' .- ..-.
1
'9;
416 Laning of Karur-Madural Section of NH-7
fm Fcsrblllty nu+ and Prepm~iono r DPR
Canmlmcy WICPX
Clause
In the event of using local sand, the sand to be used must satisfy the limits of
deleterious materials and the requirements of soundness as given in Clause. 3.2.1 and
3.6 of IS: 383 respectively. Confirmatory tests shall be conducted by the contractor
and sample kept for comparison by the Public Works Department.
Cement - Sand Mortar
For repair of spallings, where the depth of spalling exceeds 15mm cement-sand
mortar 1:4layer have been recommended after the application of PMC repair mortar,
15rnm thick.
The composition of the cement sand mortar shall be as follows:
COMPOSITION PARTS BY WEIGHT

Cement 100
Sand 400
CICO No. 1 or equivalent 3
Water Variable
The amount of water will depend on the environment condition and is therefore
variable.
In case where two layers of cement-sand mortar are to be used, the second layer shall
be provided after a lapse of 24 hours from the time of application of the first layer.
Conventional practice or surface preparation for good bonding shall be adopted for all
layers.
Conventional curing of the cement sand mortar layer by application of water spray
should be followed for at least 2 days.
Miu Formafions
PMC SLURRY
Component Parts by Weight
Cement 100
Tapecrete P 151 or equivalent 50
PMC BRUSH TOP COATING

Cement 100
Tapecrete P 1 5 1 50
Fine Silica Sand 100
PMC REPAIR MORTAR

Cement 100
Tapecrete P 151 50
Coarse Silica Sand 150
Fine Silica Sand 150
PMC FILLER
Cement 100
Tapecrete P 151 50
Concrete Sand 350
ConsultancyServices for Feasibility dudy and Preparation of DPR
Clause
Curing of PMC Work
This specification describes the curing procedures to be followed for various PMC
systems.
The curing procedures outlined apply to normal weather conditions. Take precautions
to avoid drying. PMC work should be carried out a temperature below 35C.
Under unusual weather conditions e.g. high humidity andlor high wind velocity or
imposed constraints special curing procedures shall be followed. Approval, therefore,
shall be obtained from the Engineer-in-charge.
Air-drying shall be considered to take place only during unfavourable uninterrupted

weather conditions existing throughout the recommended drying period. Some
judgement shall be made in this respect and if conditions are deemed unfavourable
for drying to occur, then drying must be prolonged for the full-recommended period
afier the weather clears.
Curing of PMC Repair Mortar and Filler
As PMC work proceeds, precautions shall be taken to prevent rapid drying of the
PMC repair mortar and PMC filler. This is usually accomplished by covering the
filled surfaces with an impermeable sheet shortly after the work has been done. The
edges of the impermeable sheet should be suitably taped.
The sheet shall be kept in place until further work is camed on over the filler or in the
case where the filler will be exposed to heavy abuse, the sheet shall be kept in place
for 24 hours.
No foot traffic or further work shall be allowed over the filler until 12 hours from the
time of the completion of the work.
All the areas repaired using cementitious materials specified above shall be fully
cured in accordance with good practice for PMC application as given under general
specifications for PMC material systems.
No curing compound shall be used as a curing membrane. Care shall be taken to

ensure complete coverage particularly around the interface with the host concrete.
For the first day the repaired concrete patch shall be protected from harsh
environment by laying a polythene sheet over it taping down the edges.
Curing PMC Brush top Coatings and PMC Slurry
In unexposed and exposed areas the initial air-drying of 2 to 12 hours shall be

followed by moist curing for 24 hours by spraying or another approved curing
method. No curing compound is to be used.
Following moist curing, the coating shall be allowed to air dry for at least 3 days prior
to the application of finishing coat.
-
J
[- +*-
' -1
' ., ' *. -
Techn~calS p e c ~ d c a t ~ o ~
\..*dTy
17
Rehabd~tatlonof Ex~st~ng
Bridges
4!6 Laning of Karur-Mahmi Smmn of UH-7
Consultancy %tv~ccs far Feasilrilny sully an!] Preprailan a1 3PR
Clause
1.8 SPECIFICATION FOR GUNITING (SHOTCRETLNG)
The gunite is a mixture of cement, sand and water. It comprises 100 pacts by weight
of cement, 300 parts by weight quartz sand, 35-50 parts by weight water and 2 parts
by weight approved quick setting compound. In general, dry mix shotcrete shall be
used.
Ordinary Portland cement conforming to IS: 269 shall be used for guniting.
Sand for guniting shall comply with the requirements stipulated in IS: 383. In general,
sand should neither be too coarse to increase the rebound nor too fine to increase the
slump. Sand should preferably have a moisture content between 3 and 6%.
The grading of sand shall lie within the limits given below:
IS Sieve Designation OO
/ Passing the Sieve
4.75 mm 95 - 100
2.36mm 65 - 90
1.18mrn 45 - 75
600 microns 30 - 50
300 microns 10-22
150 microns 2 -8
For thick sections it may be advantageous to incorporate coarse aggregate in the mix
provided adequate guniting equipment is available. Coarse sgwgate, when used
shall conform to grading given in Table 1 of IS 9012. The percentage of coarse
aggregate may normally be kept as 20 to 40% of the total a g e g a t e and the mix shall
be suitably designed. Waterlcement ratio for guniting shall fall within the range 0.35
to 0.50 by mass, wet enough to reduce the rebound. Drying shrinkage may be
between 0.06% and 0.1%. The quick setting compound shall be added at the nozzle
with water just before guniting.
The cement and sand shall be batched and mixed and conveyed through a hosepipe
with the help of compressed air. A separate line shall bring the water under pressure.
The cement, sand water mix shall be passed through and intimately mixed in a special
manifold and then projected at high velocity to the surface being repaired. The
density of gunite shall not be less than 2000 kglcum. The strength of gunite shall not
be less than 25 Mpa. For effective guniting the nozzle shall be kept 60 to 150 cm
away from the surface, preferably normal to that surface. While enclosing
reinforcement bars during repairs the nozzle shall be held closer at a slight angle and
the mix shall be wetter than the normal.
Test panels simulating actual field conditions shall be fabricated for conducting pre-
ct.mHructi~ntesting. The procedure for testing the cubes or cylinders taken from the
panels stipulated in clause 6 of IS: 9012 shall be followed. It should be ensured from
tests that a strength of about 30 MPa at 28 days is available for the moaar/concrete
mix.
The defective concrete shall be cut out to the full depth till sound concrete surface is
reached. Under no circumstances should the thickness of concrete to be removed be
less than clear cover to the main reinforcement. No square shoulders shall be left at
the perimeter of the cut-off portion and all edges shall be tapered. Thereafter, all
loose and foreign materids *houid be removed and the surface be sand-blasted to
- - ,'
< -
\
\
<
1 % .
1,
Technlcal Speclficat~ons I . ' ! Rehab~l~tahon

of Exlstlng Bridges
Contract Package NS 80 , ' C, 18
A
%
,\ ' /
\.<
/'
,
+
- __-,
4/6 Laning of Karur-Madurai Seclion of MI-7
Clause
make it rough to receive shotcrete after applying a coat of bonding epoxy as per
recommendation of the manufacturer @ 1.0 kg per 1.5 sqm of surface area.
The exposed reinforcement shall be thoroughly cleaned free of rust etc. by wire
brushing. Wherever the reinforcements have been corroded the same shall be
removed ad replaced by additional reinforcement. Before application of gunite a
coat of neat cement slurry should be applied on the surface of the reinforcement.
Sufficient clearance shall be provided around the reinforcement to permit encasement
with sound gunite. Care shall be taken to avoid sand pockets behind the
reinforcements.
A thickness of 25 to 40mm of gunite can normally be deposited in one operation. It

would always be necessary to apply guniting on a damp concrete surface.
Where required, welded wire fabrics 5 cm x 5 cm x No. 10 gauge shall be provided in

the first layer of guniting. The fabric shall be tied properly. In case the damage to the
concrete member is too deep, the specifications for guniting as well as requirement of
placement of wire mesh has to be decided as per field conditions.
The stipulations given in IS: 9012 regarding applications of gunite should be followed
so as to keep the rebound to the minimum. The quality of guniting and workmanship
shall be such that the percentage of rebound mentioned in IS: 9012 can be adhered to.
In no circumstances shall the rebound material be reused in the work. It would be
desirable that green gunite is moistened as curing requirement for at least 7 days.
Guniting work shall not be done during windy or rainy conditions.
Technical Specifications Rehabilltationof Existmg Bndges

I Contract Package NS 80 19

Karur To Dindigul Vol - Iiic of III (A B C D)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Karur To Dindigul Vol - Iiic of III (A B C D)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONCESSION AGREEMENT

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

TN (DK) EXPRESSWAYS LIMITED

(i) Design, Construction, Development, Finance, Operation and Maintenance

Contract Package No.: NS 2/BOT/TN-4

VOLUME: IIIc of 111(a,b,c,d)

1 SL.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. I

I i I Bearing Design 250m 3 1 10 1

i Cross Girder ! 53 66-

iii j Superstruciurs 2FOm 75 1 180

.-nI c Outer Lang Girder

i Repair of Structures 180

LEA ASSOCIATES SOUTH ASIA PVT.LTD.

DocumenUFile No.: No. Of Sheets: Revision: Date: Dec. 2003

For The Approval M. Prepared By: LOKESH TYAGl

Checked By: LOKESH WAG1 Approved By: JPDAS

LEA ASSOCIATES SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED

FT- = I N per krClO

Cafficicnt of wrtieal seismic force = 0.03

M d Wind force = 450 Kg. Per running m

Mininum dnd prurun =

f~.hl*.l = 29.2%KN per h r i r g - -.

vmax 1482.25 1157.94 1482.25 1482.26

V min 724.65 765.86 724.65 724.65

0.00 53.05 29.28 53.05

Moment of Inertia ( I )(at ~tuppw)) *

1.1 BASIC DATA

No.of Steel plate n = nos B.n%.mm= c

1.) - m 8-fW langmdd -T

1.5 catmete RPptrtiu

6.4 Rotation of Bc<lri~ (yd (radian) % (radian)

otation due t o Dad Load & SIDL+Prcstws 0.003034 0.000000

6.5 Chock for Bearirwr 6Q4mchv as Wr CI. 936.3.3

6.7 Check for Rotation as ps CI. 916.3.5

6.8 Check fa, Fridion as wr CI. 916.3.6

724.6484 3.6428 0.56000 0.4700

6.9 C h u k for Total Shear Stress us mr CI. 916.3.7

-_- Length of Pcdtstol (Across Bridge Axis) = 860

DESIGN OF CIRCULAR COLCMN SECTJON flinrmal Case)

Stress at neutral axis

DESIGN OF ClRCZ'JA.4RCOLUMN SECTION (Wind Care)

Desirn the section as cracked section

DESIGN OF CIRCULAR COLI3lN SECTlOY (Seismic Case)

Abut Reinforcement-Normal LASA

DESTGN OF CRClrLAR COCITMN SECTON (Wind Case)

Resultant compressive sbess in concrete (aqal) -2.733 kglcm2

Design the section as uncracked section

nESIGN OF CRCLU,.4R COLUMN SECTTOY (Seismic Case)

;--2~..".--j..-! ,.,-.. i,-.- ~.-i-,$%.3L.,J

EXTlW DUE TO SlDL

Design of abutment & abutment foundation

DATA FOR abulment DESIGN:-

Innut f i r /Q&S from s u ~ c t u for

Abt-Designllnput Data LASA

Typical design calculations for RCC abutment

Calculation of Dead Load from Super Structure :-

Abt-DesignIDesign of RCC Abutment "'yL*-

A) Calculation of Dead Load from Sub Structure :- -

From Circular abutment :-

For Elastameric Beadnu:- Fh Applied horizental bm

Vr.Ltc - 6.00 tonnes

For 0.00 m of span

For 25 mofspan F =FN2 + Vr.Ltc