Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic 34
Module 34.1
Learning Objectives
Contents
1. Introduction to nutrigenomics
2. Scientific disciplines contributing to nutrigenomics
3. The new technologies
4. Sophisticated bioinformatics approaches
5. Transgenic mouse models and cellular models
6. Detecting the two hits
7. The second strategy - systems biology approach
8. Goals of nutrigenomics research
Key Messages
The basics of genetics, genomics and gene regulation with relation to diet;
The basic approaches: Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, Epigenetics;
New genomics technologies;
General approaches: Hypothesis-driven approach, systems biology approach;
The concepts of nutrigenetics (genetic susceptibility, SNPs, polygenic (complex) diseases,
"personalized" diet).
321
322
The sum total of association and laboratory studies show Applied wisely, it will promote an
that diet and the chemicals in diet, influence physiological increased understanding of how
processes. This is achieved by altering the expression (or nutrition influences metabolic
structure) of a subset of genes in the human genome. pathways and homeostatic control;
how this regulation is disturbed in
Dietary chemicals have been shown to alter gene expression the early phase of a diet-related
in a number of ways. For example, they may: disease and to what extent
act as ligands for transcription factor receptors, individual sensitizing genotypes
be metabolized by primary or secondary metabolic contribute to such diseases.
pathways thereby altering concentrations of substrates Ultimately, nutrigenomics will allow
or intermediates or effective dietary-intervention
serve as signaling molecules. strategies to recover normal
homeostasis and to prevent diet-
Fig. 4
related diseases (1).
2. Scientific disciplines
contributing to
nutrigenomics
Nutrigenomics is an integrative
science that seeks to provide a
genetic and molecular
understanding for how common
dietary chemicals affect the balance
between health and disease by
altering the expression and/or
structure of an individuals genetic
makeup.
In the past decade, nutrition
research has undergone an
important shift in focus from
epidemiology and physiology to
improved knowledge in its
molecular and genetic basis.
This is mainly a result of three factors that have led to a growing realization that the effects of
nutrition on health and disease cannot be understood without a profound understanding of how
nutrients act at the molecular level (1):
the completion of several large genome projects has markedly altered the research agenda by
drawing attention to the importance of genes in human nutrition, and has provided a wealth of
new genetic information to be explored;
there has been a growing recognition that micronutrients and macronutrients can be potent
dietary signals that influence the metabolic programming of cells and have an important role in
the control of homeostasis;
nutrition researchers have increasingly started to recognize that genetic predisposition can be
an important contributor to the main causes of mortality that are linked to diet, such as
cardiovascular disease, diabetes type II and cancers.
323
324
Fig. 8
325
650000
(A)
600000
550000
inst
500000
7
450000
400000
3
5
350000
300000 6
4
250000
8
200000
150000
2
100000 1
50000
0
Time--> 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00
8000
75
6000
4000 158
360
189
2000 139
99 229
244
207
281 303 375 446
332 399
0
m/z-->
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
326
To raise nutrigenomics above the level of purely descriptive data, we must understand how food
components regulate gene or protein expression. For this purpose, mutant mice (particularly
knockout mice) have become an invaluable tool. Using knockout mice, we can unambiguously
establish how a particular transcription factor mediates the effect of a specific nutrient: a goal that
is impossible to achieve in human studies. In combination with cell-culture studies, the use of
327
Similarly, retinoic-acid receptor knockout mice have provided insights into the molecular
mechanism of vitamin A action. These mice mimic the symptoms of vitamin A deficiency and are,
therefore, important tools for the study of the genomic effects of vitamin A. The increasing number
of available knockout (or knockdown) mice should allow us to investigate many more nutrient
signalling pathways.
6. Detecting the two hits: pro-inflammatory and metabolic stress (from (1))
Fig.14 Detecting the two hits: pro-inflammatory and metabolic stress (1)
Cells are regularly exposed to stress, which mainly consists of inflammatory stress and metabolic
stress. Inflammatory stress is exerted by cytokines that are released in large quantities by immune
cells in response to invading microorganisms.
Cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 induce the
hepatic acute-phase response which consists of local and systemic reactions and is accompanied by
up regulated or down regulated synthesis and/or activation of liver-enriched transcription factors.
Cytokines promote the synthesis of acute phase proteins, in part by down regulating nuclear
receptors, such as peroxisome proliferator activated receptor- (PPAR-), which suppress the
expression of genes encoding acute-phase proteins such as serum amyloid protein and C-reactive
protein.
328
329
This will allow the discovery of dietary target genes and the characterization of the mechanisms
that underline dietary sensing. Nutritional systems biology will take advantage of the combination
of -omics, to identify molecular biomarkers. These biomarkers will allow early dietary
intervention to reverse the onset of diet-related diseases and to regain homeostasis.
Functional genomics and proteomics approaches, in conjunction with metabolic control analysis
are increasingly used to study the metabolic status of cells in an effort to understand the metabolic
effects of specific perturbations at the gene and protein level.
Systems biology aims to understand phenotypic variation and build comprehensive models of
cellular organization and function. It also seeks to elucidate the interaction and functions of
cellular, organ and even organism-wide systems. The optimism for using systems biology in nutrition
research relates to the implementation of metabolomics, which allows the extensive, sensitive and
rapid measurement of metabolic profiles in blood or organ samples.
We do not know the function of most of the 35,000 - 40,000 genes, >100,000 proteins and several
thousand metabolites in humans. We are also dealing with complex genotypes of polygenic diseases.
The integration of all these data will require both intellectual and financial investments in
analytical platforms, dataware housing, laboratory information-management systems, new database
structures, algorithms and so on.
330
References
1. M. Mller and S. Kersten (2003) Nutrigenomics: Goals And Strategies. Nature Reviews - Genetics:
4, 315-322.
2. J. Mathers (2005) The Science Of Nutrigenomics. In: NUTRIGENOMICS - Report of a workshop
hosted by The Nuffield Trust and organized by the Public Health Genetics Unit on 5 February
2004. Compiled by H. Burton and A. Stewart. The Nuffield Trust, 6-8.
3. N. Fogg-Johnson and J. Kaput (2003) Nutrigenomics: An Emerging Scientific Discipline. Food
Technology: 57, 4, 60-67.
4. R. Jaenisch and A. Bird (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome
integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genetics Suppl.: 33 245254.
331