Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CUMENE PREPARATION
---_._-_.-
Cochin University OfScience And Technology
._---_.~
Cumene
...
-~
Preparation
s.o INTRODUCTION
Thus, there still exists scope to develop better catalysts which would
catalyze the isopropylation of benzene to cumene with excellent conversion
and selectivity at comparatively low temperatures, a practical value of time -
on - stream, ease of preparation, reusability and reactivation of the catalysts.
scheme 5.0.1.
Cochin University
OfScience
.
And Technoloev
b.
195
Chapter 5
OH
1. A--" ~ + H20
2. 0 +~ _.d"
4. +~
5.
.. 2
6.
7.
8. + I~
o -~o +
..._ - - - - - -
Cochin University OfScience And Technology 197
Chapter 5
The reaction is done over a wide temperature range, molar ratio and
WHSV at a time on stream (TaS) of 2 h in order to study the effect of various
parameters on the conversion and selectivity to know the condition for getting
maximum catalytic properties. ZM is the selected catalyst to check effect of
reaction parameters.
TEMPERATURE OPTIMIZATION
100
80
60
40
20
O+-'--~~:::::;~~-r---G- . . . . . . .---&---.
100 150 200 250 300
Temperature (QC)
- .-_-------
Cochin University OfScience And Technology 199
Chapter 5
Thus a temperature of 150C is selected as the optimum one as clear from the
figure 5.2. I. Further increase in temperature results in cumene and di-
substituted product. This could be due to the trans alkylation of 1,3,5-
triisopropylbenzene (TIPB) to form cumene as well as diisopropylbenzene
(DIPBl
Benzene to IPA molar ratio in the feed plays important role in the
conversion as well as selectivity. During the reaction number of moles of
IPA/h/g of catalyst was kept constant. The amount of benzene is changed. Both
conversion as well as selectivity increases with increase in the benzene: IPA
molar ratio. At low molar ratio of 4, DIPB and TIPB selectivity is higher due
to the increased alkylation of cumene to DIPB and DIPB' to TJPB. With
-------~
increase in the ratio the selectivity of higher alkyIated product decreased. The
decrease in selectivity of di- and tri- isopropyl benzenes is due to the fact that
trans-a1kylation of these products is more favored with increased benzene: IPA
molar ratio. At and above a molar ratio of 10, present systems give cumene as
the only product as seen from figure 5_2.2.
100
~ 80
60 - t - - - - . , . . . . . - - - - r - - - - , . . . . . - - - - - ,
7 10 14 20
Benzene/IPA
With higher contact times, i.e. at low WHSV, the DIPBs, which are the
primary alkylated products with cumene, got trans-alkylated leading to higher
cumene selectivity. Decreased contact time (of 8.7 & 10.4 h') diminishes the
possibility of trans alkylation of di- and tri- substituted products that resulted
decrease in cumene selectivity.
The reaction of propene with benzene takes place over Bronsted acid
sites'". First step is the dehydration of 2-propanol to propene. Proton
abstraction from Bronsted acid sites results in the formation of carbocation,
+H.
+
+~~~
0J
~ b
~OIigomers
Scheme 5.3.1 A plausible mechanism for benzene isopropylation over
Bransted acid sites
It was found" that very strong acid sites catalyze the isomerization of
isopropyl benzene to n-propylbenzene, particularly at relatively higher
temperatures. Relatively low strong acid sites concentration and the low
- - _..- -
Cochin University OfScience And Technology 205
Chapter 5
----------------------=
temperature operation avoid the formation of n-propylbenzene over present
clay systems.
the catalytic activity with the Brensted site distribution calculated from
cumene cracking studies. Figure 5.5.1 shows a perfect correlation of IPA
conversion over the Brensted acid sites.
100
80
60
40
20 -t-L~-r---,-----r-.---,------;r--..,.---r-.-----,---,
~ ~~ '\~ ~ .t 0~'\~'".t,\0~~~G~'\,.0~
Catalyst
1.6
! 90 _ E
C
0_ 60
1.2 .: ~
... "0"'--,
c;
C4ll'--
.~ ~ 08 :::s ~ lI) 0
. o+:EE
~C
o
30
. E~~.s
04 411
o ~
o +-+--+-+--+-+---+--+--+-~-+--+--+ 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Z ~ N ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Catalyst
DEACTIVATION STUDIES
100
90
~
e
80
.... 70
~
'-' 60
.:==
III
50
~ 40
~ 30
Cl
U 20
10
o -t---r--.......----r..:::>~_ _X--r-X__r_X_._X_,
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time (h)
5.8 CONCLUSIONS
-----------
Cochin University ofScience And Technology 2]0
_----------------.~-- __f'!.~nene Preparation
REFERENCES:
1. T.e. Tsa, S.B. Liu, I. Wang, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 181 (1999) 355.
(1992) 125.
4. 10. K.S.N. Reddy, B.S. Rao, V.P. Shiralkar, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 95
(1993) 53.
5. M. Sasidharan, K. R. Reddy, R. Kumar, J. Catal. 154 (1995) 2\6.
6. B. Halgery, J. Das, Appl. Catal. A. 181 (l999) 347.
7. G. Bellussi, G. Pazzuconi, C. Perego, G. Girotti, G. Terzoni, 1 Catal.
157 (1995) 227.
8. J.M. Valtierraa, O. Zaldivara, lA. Montoyab, 1 Navarreteb, l.A. De
Los Reyesc, M.A. Sancheza, Appl. Catal. A. 166 (1998) 387.
9. U. Sridevi, V.V. Bokadea, C.V.V. Sathyanarayana, B.S. Rao, C.
Pradhan, B.K.B. Rao, 1 Mol. Catal. A. 181 (2002) 257.
10. W.W. Kaeding, R.E. Holland, J. Catal. 109 (1988) 212.
11. 1. Panming, W. Qiuying, Z. Chao, X. Yanhe, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 91
(1992) 125.
12. T.F. Degnan, C.M. Smith, C.R. Venkat, Appt. Catat. A: Gen. 221
(2001) 283.
13. G. Girotti, F. Rivetti, S. Ramello, L. Carnelli, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 204-205 (2003) 571.
14. D. Das, H.K. Mishra, A.K. Dalai, K.M. Parida, Catal. Lett. 93 (2004)
185.
15. S. Siffert, L. Gaillard, B.L. Su, 1. Mol, Catat. 183 (2000) 267.
16. A. Corma, V.M. Soria, E. Schnoeveld, J. Catal. 192 (2000) 163.
17. G.A. Olah (ed), Friedel-Crafts and Related reactions, Vol. 2, WiIey,
New York, 1964.
18. P.B. Venuto, P.S. Landis, Adv. Catal. 18 (1968) 259.
19. J.F. Haw, B.R. Richardson, I.S. Oshiro, N.D. Lazo, J.A. Speed, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 2052.
20. V.B. Kazansky, Sov. Chem. Rev. 1 (1988) 1109.
***************