Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14 Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) files this Complaint against Defendant Gene Farrell
16 I. SUMMARY
17 1. Amazon brings this action against its former employee Farrell because he started
18 work with Amazons competitor, Smartsheet, Inc. (Smartsheet), and is in breach of his
19 agreement not to compete against Amazon for a limited time following the termination of his
21 2. Farrell began work for Amazon in April 2012, joining Amazon Web Services,
22 LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amazon (AWS). In January 2016, Farrell was promoted
23 to Vice President of the AWS Enterprise Applications & EC2 Windows team.
25 computing. Before cloud computing, individuals and businesses had to purchase servers and
26
27
2 the specific computing resources they need (from companies like AWS), when they need them.
5 corporate email and calendaring, document storage and collaboration, virtual meetings, video
6 calls, and chats, and virtual desktops. AWSs product offerings are in constant development.
7 5. Farrell was deeply involved in and knows, among other things, the technical
11 Agreement), a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In the
13 disclosure restrictions. These restrictions protect Amazons trade secrets and its highly
15 its existing and prospective business relationships, and its confidential plans and strategies.
16 7. On May 18, 2017, Farrell advised Amazon that he intended to leave Amazon
17 effective May 26, 2017, to take a Head of Product job at Smartsheeta company that also
18 offers a cloud-based productivity product. Amazon informed Farrell that this role would be
20 8. As a Vice President, Farrell had access to the most critical confidential and
21 proprietary information of AWS. Farrell was involved in and privy to AWSs strategy,
22 roadmap, pipeline, customers, strengths and weakness for cloud-based productivity products,
23 including the development of new products not yet publicly launched or announced. This
24 information is not available to those outside of Amazon, and even within the company was
25 accessible only by those with a legitimate business reason for needing such information.
26
27
3 but not limited to those for project management, collaboration, and/or automation, and will
4 therefore breach the Noncompetition Agreement and threaten the disclosure of Amazons
6 10. Amazon asks this Court to enforce the terms of the Noncompetition Agreement
7 and to restrain Farrell from working for Smartsheet for 18-months from the date of his
8 departure.
9 II. PARTIES
10 11. Amazon is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
12 12. Farrell is a former Amazon employee and was at all times relevant to this
13 complaint a resident of King County, Washington. On information and belief, Farrell currently
17 because Farrell entered into the Noncompetition Agreement in Washington; he is (or was at
19 performed his contract with Amazon in Washington; and because he expressly consented to the
21 14. Venue properly lies in King County because a substantial part of the events
22 giving rise to this claim occurred in King County, defendant Farrell resides in King County,
23 and the express terms of Farrells Noncompetition Agreement with Amazon provide that venue
24 for any action brought to enforce that agreement shall be in King County, Washington.
25
26
27
2 product offerings or even develop new products competitive to AWSs products and undermine
4 21. Amazons confidential information and trade secrets are the results of significant
5 and long-term investments of money and resources, and Amazon takes extensive steps to keep
6 them confidential.
7 22. If Farrell is allowed to continue work at Smartsheet providing input into the
8 strategy of developing and marketing cloud-based productivity products, including but not
9 limited to those for project management, collaboration, and/or automation, Farrell will violate
12 harm to Amazon, including allowing Smartsheet to develop and grow its own programs and
14 24. In sum, if Farrell is allowed to violate his duties to Amazon and AWS, he can
15 provide Smartsheet a roadmap to AWSs product development and can unfairly lead
16 Smartsheet in evolving its product to better compete with AWS products and forthcoming
17 products.
18 V. CLAIMS
19 Breach of Noncompetition Agreement
20 25. Amazon incorporates herein all allegations in the preceding paragraphs of this
21 Complaint.
22 26. As a condition of his employment, Farrell entered into a valid and binding
23 Noncompetition Agreement with Amazon in which he promised that he would not, for a period
24 of 18 months following termination of his employment with Amazon, compete with Amazon
26
27
2 Agreement.
3 28. Farrell has started employment with Smartsheet and is leading Smartsheets
4 product business, including by directly or indirectly competing with Amazon for its existing or
6 29. Farrells breach of the Noncompetition Agreement will cause irreparable harm
7 to Amazon and should therefore be enjoined as expressly authorized by the terms of the
8 Noncompetition Agreement.
10 Agreement, Amazon has suffered and/or will suffer (if Farrells conduct is not enjoined)
16 (i) Enjoins Farrell from all actions in violation of, or that would interfere
17 with Amazons rights under, the Noncompetition Agreement, including but not limited to
18 enjoining Farrell from engaging in any activities that directly or indirectly support any aspect of
21 use or the use of others any confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets of Amazon
22 or its subsidiaries;
24 files, reports, work product, and/or other materials, if any, that Farrell has in his possession,
25 custody, or control that were obtained from Amazon or that constitute work product owned by
27
2 engaging in any activities that directly or indirectly support any aspect of Smartsheets cloud-
3 based project management, collaboration, or automation business, and that such period be
4 extended or equitably tolled to the extent warranted by the fact of the case;
5 (v) Prohibits Farrell, for a period of 18 months after May 26, 2017, from
6 directly or indirectly accepting or soliciting business from any prospective customer of Amazon
7 as of the date of his termination, and that such period be extended or equitably tolled to the
9 (vi) Prohibits Farrell for a period of 18 months after May 26, 2017, from
10 entering into business arrangements with any of Amazons customers, and that such period be
11 extended or equitably tolled to the extent warranted by the fact of the case; and
12 (vii) Prohibits Farrell for a period of 12 months after May 26, 2017, from
13 hiring, soliciting, or working with persons who were employed by Amazon in the 12 months
14 prior to his departure, and that such period be extended or equitably tolled to the extent
16 B. For judgment against Farrell for damages, including damages for his unjust
22
24
25
26
27
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27