Department of Education

NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES

2 Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue, Pasig Cit
nd

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN

Provincial Capitol Compound, City of Malolos, Bulacan

QAME Analysis Form 1: Analysis of the Monitoring/Evaluation Results

ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESU

(to be accomplished by Individual monitors)

Title of the Training Program: K to 12 Division Mass Training of Grade 6 Teachers

Learning Service Provider (Division/TEI):
BULACAN
Venue: Jesus Is Lord Colleges Foundation, Inc. Proponent: SDO Bulacan G
Learning Area: MAPEH Class Section: B
NAME OF MONITOR/IT: JONATHAN YVES P. CRUZ Date Monitored: May 15-21, 20
PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation
Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observatio

1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

AREAS FOR
STRONG POINTS Factors that helped
IMPROVEMENT
SESSION TITLES &
FACILITATORS (Based on criateria
(This may be done through a (Based on criateria selected by
selected by participants in Focus-Group Discussion) participants in FORM D)
FORM D)
Day 1: Overall 3.41
Rating: Activities were appropriate Difference of classroom Session ended on time
for adult learners assessment.
Session: 3.58

Facilitator exhibited Apply the learnings and to Facilitator asked stimulating

Facilitator: 3.68 mastery of the topic help assist my co-teacher. questions.
Day 2: Overall 3.69
Rating: Participants were engaged Strategies on how to teach it Session started on time
3.75 in activities to the learners.
Session:
Facilitator processed questions
Facilitator exhibited The different elements in
Facilitator: 3.82 and responses to deepen
mastery of the topic music. learning
Day 3: Overall 3.74
Rating: Objectives of the session The different elements in Activities were appropriate for
were achieved arts. adult learners
Session: 3.76

Facilitator observed proper More activities and performance Facilitator asked stimulating
Facilitator: 3.77 attire based on my pupils. questions
Day 4: Overall 3.71
Rating: Art appreciation and
Activities were congruent to understanding personal NONE
objectives
Session: 3.78 health.

Facilitator observed proper Strategies especially in

Facilitator: 3.79 NONE
attire doing some art activities
Day 5: Overall 3.78
Rating: Participants were engaged The importance of NONE
in activities environmental sanitation
 Participants were engaged The importance of NONE
in activities environmental sanitation
Session: 3.84

Facilitator observed proper Give more interesting

Facilitator: 3.84 NONE
attire activities
Day 6: Overall 3.86 flexible and do what must be
Rating: Topic was relevant to our done in the field of learning NONE
work and apply what we've
Session: 3.89 learned.
I learned the different
Facilitator exhibited
Facilitator: 3.91 strategies in teaching NONE
mastery of the topic MAPEH
2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training management

Day:
Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Idenfy the factors that help
STRONG POINTS
DAY OVERALL RATING
(Based on criateria selected by participants in FORM D)
DAY 1 3.41 Activities were appropriate for adult learners

DAY 2 3.69 Participants were engaged in activities

DAY 3 3.74 Objectives of the session were achieved

DAY 4 3.71 Activities were congruent to objectives

DAY 5 3.78 Participants were engaged in activities

DAY 6 3.86 Topic was relevant to our work

DAY 7

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table belo

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s

None None
IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management team for
information and immediate action.

PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE END-PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1.0 4.0 )

Identify Class Program Attainment of Provision of Support

Section/s and Management Delivery of Content
Objectives Materials
batches
MAPEH B
4 4 4 4

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback (include frequency count beside every major catego
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
I learned the different strategies in teaching MAPEH
FURTHER LEARNING: I will share the different learning strategies that I learned in the seminar.

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT: More manipulative activities for the teachers.

Submitted by: JONATHAN YVES P. CRUZ

IT Personnel
CopyGivento:On-Site QAME Team Leader
 rtment of Education
ORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
epEd Complex, Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
DIVISION OF BULACAN
ompound, City of Malolos, Bulacan

NITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS
lished by Individual monitors)

Teachers Inclusive Dates: May 15-21, 2017

SDO Bulacan Grade 6 Teachers

B
May 15-21, 2017

cipants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site monitors, answer the following questions:

ors that helped in these areas, if possible.

Factors that may have Recommended Steps to Address the
contributed to the areas
for improvement Issue/s.

(This may be done through a (Indicate whether action can be immediate

Focus-Group Discussion) or long-term)

More manipulative activities Giving more manipulative activites for the

for the teachers. participant

Provide some materials Materials will be provided

Prepare individual materials Individual matereals for activity will be

for activities. prepared.

They should provide more More activities in the arts will be give.
activities in arts.

insufficient time for the topic. More time for the topic.

Give more activities and

techniques in art. More activities in the arts will be give.

NONE NONE

NONE NONE

NONE NONE
 NONE NONE

NONE NONE

NONE NONE

NONE NONE

hese incidents in the table below:

Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation

g program? Idenfy the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT & SUGGESTIONS
(Based on criateria selected by participants in FORM D)
Session ended on time

Session started on time

Activities were appropriate for adult learners

NONE

NONE

NONE

escribe these incidents in the table below:

Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation

None
ram Management team for

ed at the end of the training program)

CRITERIA (Values from 1.0 4.0 )

Program Management Training Venue Accommodations

Team
 4 4 4

y count beside every major category):

ed in the seminar.

tive activities for the teachers.

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III-Central Luzon
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN
Capitol Compound, City of Malolos
K to 12 TRAINING for GRADE 5 T
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 2
SUMMARY OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVAL
(to be accomplished by On-Site Team Leade

Title of Training Program:K to 12 Division Mass Training of Grade 6 Teachers

Learning Service Provider/Division: Schools Division of Bulacan
Region of Program: Region III- Central Luzon
Division/HEI: Schools Division of Bulacan
Venue: Jesus is Lord Colleges Foundation Inc., Bunlo, Bocaue, Bulacan
Inclusive Dates: May 8-14, 2017
Learning Area/s: English, Filipino, Science, & Technology & Livelihood Education
Participants: (No. of Participants and General Description): 504
Name of On-Site Team Leader: Mr. Virgilio L. Laggui
Mobile Number of On-Site Team Leader: 0943-261-8741

1. What is the daily overall rating of the sessions and facilitators?

Overall Session-Facilitator
Rating (Average of General General Rating for General Rating for
Day Rating for Sessions and Sessions Facilitators
Facilitators)

1 3.925 3.91 3.94

2 3.885 3.88 3.89

3 3.96 3.96 3.96

4 3.95 Page 7 of 40 3.93 3.97

 4 3.95
5 3.97
6 3.96
SITE AVERAGE FOR SESSIONS AND
FACILITATORS:
Major Observations/ Findings: The sessions were successfully delivered by well prepared facilitators who were ma
2. What is the overall rating of the daily PROGRAM MANAGEMENT of the training program?
Day Overall Rating
1 3.87
2 3.85
3 3.88
4 3.89
5 3.93
Page 8 of 40
3.93 3.97
3.96 3.98
3.93 3.99
3.942
Summary of Significan
Internet connectivity should be available at all times. Make sure th
Good job to all the persons involved. We enjoyed the first day of t
members of the TWG are courteous, efficient, responsive to needs
The seminar ran smoothly. The program/management executed th
satisfied with today`s management of the training, with very hospi
Shalom... Congratulations to DepEd Bulacan. Please provide us eas
room should be provided in the next training.
We commend the action done by the management in providing be
comfortable inside the session room.Thank you. Good managemen
management team were very accommodating. They made us felt w
hospitable and friendly staffs, foods served were nutritious and wi
for the new air conditioning unit . The rooms became more condu
Please serve cold water, that will be more refreshing than juice in t
discussions and participation during group activities. Please provid
Keep up the good work
Already improved. Approachable staff. Always available when need
maintain the good service. Organizers planned and organized the
participants. Continue providing trainings that will promote quality
provide us easy access to wifi connections so we can connect faste
Continue to conduct seminars and training for the betterment of t
The program was well-organized. Thumbs up for for the TWG, it's j
made easy. All the materials needed were provided. Well ventilate
staff are kind and very approachable. Thanks JIL... for the nice acco
 The program was well-organized. Thumbs up for for the TWG, it's j
made easy. All the materials needed were provided. Well ventilate
5 3.93 staff are kind and very approachable. Thanks JIL... for the nice acco

Our training on K to 12 was well planned. Thank you for providing

our teaching skills. Excellent in all aspects, a little bit in the food se
6 3.89 management did its best most especially the facilitators. The progr
PMT, Division Team, JILCF management and staff. God will reward y

AVERAGE FOR
OPERATIONS 3.885
Major Observations/ Findings: Daily evaluation of Program Management Team helped identify flaws in the daily
to eradicate recurrence of such flaws.

3. Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program Provider/Management?

CRITICAL INCIDENT/S BASED ON STAR Training Provider Venue of Training

NONE

Major Observations/Findings: Pre-emptive planning and structuring helped prevent incurrence of critical incide

4. ANALYSIS OF THE END-PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1.

Training
Site/Venue
Attainment of
Program Management Delivery of Content
Objectives
(include class
sections)
SCIENCE (A) 4.00 4.00 4.00
SCIENCE (B) 3.98 4.00 4.00
SCIENCE (C) 4.00 4.00 4.00
MATH (A) 4.00 4.00 4.00
MATH (B) 3.99 3.93 3.98
MATH (C) 3.99 4.00 3.99
EPP (A) 3.96 3.98 3.98
EPP (B) 4.00 4.00 4.00
EPP (C) 4.00 4.00 4.00
SITE AVERAGE*: 3.972
*Average of ALL 7 criteria within a training site/venue
Page 9 of 40
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback (include frequency count beside every m
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING:
The mastery on the assigned topics demonstrated by the discussants or resource speakers helped us (th
12 Grade 5 curriculum. Discussants were all excellent in motivating the participants to participate activ
of participants.

FURTHER LEARNING:
We appreciated the use of ICT, indeed we can't do away with it since we are dealing with 21st century le
discuss their lessons.

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT:

The Project Management Team/ Division Technical Work Group planned very well the training. It was m
Job well done by the all the members of K to 12 Team of DepEd Bulacan!

5. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:

None.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

None.

Submitted by: Mr. Virgilio L. Laggui

Noted by:

Gregorio C. Quinto, Jr. Marcos M. dela Cru

CID Chief SGOD Chief

Copy Given to: Regional QAME Team Leader

Page 10 of 40
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III-Central Luzon
CHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN
Capitol Compound, City of Malolos
AINING for GRADE 5 TEACHERS
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 2
OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
be accomplished by On-Site Team Leader)

Grade 6 Teachers

Summary of Comments and Suggestions

The training suits best to the needs of participants. Just continue the good job. You did a great job.
Topics were relevant to our work. Activities were congruent to objectives. Activities were appropriate
for adult learners. Participants were engaged in activities.The trainors involved in the training are well
prepared. Facilitators exhibited mastery of the topics. Facilitators expressed ideas clearly. They
maintained positive learning environment.

The trainers showed mastery of the topics they presented. The discussants presented their topics lively.
The facilitators were well prepared and well versed with the topics assigned to them. We think there
is nothing to improve because the discussants are at their best. They should maintain their enthusiasm.
Continue to provide us with good speakers. The trainings suit best to the needs of participants. The 2nd
day of training was a fruitful one. Keep it up, Kudos to the speakers!

The discussant delivered their topics very comprehensively. They were all excellent in motivating the
participants to participate actively in the different activities.. Congrats for the job well done. Continue
what had been started. We're very fortunate to have combination of good team of discussants and very
lively participants inside the session room... Keep it up!

The sessions are alive and the activities are exciting. The topics are very helpful. The seminar is very
informative and helpful in our teaching career. The speakers have mastery of their topics. Excellent
speakers. Knowledgeable discussants. The participants should demonstrate discipline all the times and
accept the challenges of the changes in the curriculum wholeheartedly. Job well done. ..speakers are all
Page 11before
great. Great Job! There must be clearer instructions of 40every activity.
 The sessions are alive and the activities are exciting. The topics are very helpful. The seminar is very
informative and helpful in our teaching career. The speakers have mastery of their topics. Excellent
speakers. Knowledgeable discussants. The participants should demonstrate discipline all the times and
accept the challenges of the changes in the curriculum wholeheartedly. Job well done. ..speakers are all
great. Great Job! There must be clearer instructions before every activity.

Good job to everyone. The targets of today's activity were achieved. We really enjoyed the seminar
wherein we learned a lot. Trainers are all approachable and delivered their topics well. Everything went
smoothly on the fifth day. The facilitators processed questions well and gave the participants clear
understanding about the topics. Keep it up. Maintain the good flow of sessions. The program was well
executed by the facilitators.

Training enhanced our skills in using ICT however project making should be planned. We
would like to extend our sincerest thanks to the team. The members of the program
management were well prepared most especially the facilitators. Continue helping and
enriching teachers like us, may your tribe increase. The program was perfect. Keep up the
good work!

by well prepared facilitators who were masters of their respective topics.

the training program?

Summary of Significant Comments and Suggestions

uld be available at all times. Make sure that the room is big enough for the participants.
ns involved. We enjoyed the first day of training. Equipment are serviceable.Comfort rooms are clean. The
e courteous, efficient, responsive to needs of participants.

y. The program/management executed their tasks well. The flow of the program was well-organized. We are
nagement of the training, with very hospitable staff. Thanks for the warm accommodation. Clean comfort rooms.
s to DepEd Bulacan. Please provide us easy access to wifi connections so we can connect faster. Hopefully, a larger
d in the next training.

done by the management in providing better source of ventillation for all of us. By doing so, we felt more
ession room.Thank you. Good management, all the materials needed were promptly provided. The members of the
very accommodating. They made us felt we're important the way we were treated as participants. Good job. Very
taffs, foods served were nutritious and with variety...that seldom happened in the past. Mabuhay po kayo. Thanks
ing unit . The rooms became more conducive to learning. Congrats, all activities were accomplished as planned.
that will be more refreshing than juice in tetra pack. Wider spaces should be provided to elicit attention during
tion during group activities. Please provide us easy access to wifi connections so we can connect faster. Mahusay..

oachable staff. Always available when needed. We are satisfied with the program management and operations. Just
e. Organizers planned and organized the training well. Provide a wider and more comfortable venue for the
oviding trainings that will promote quality education. The management made the seminar more systematic ..Please
o wifi connections so we can connect faster. Hopefully, a larger room would be provided in the next training.
minars and training for the betterment of teachers and students. Nothing in particular.

ganized. Thumbs up for for the TWG, it's job well done. Thru efficient internet connection online evaluation was
ials needed were provided. Well ventilated venue. Keep up the good work Bulacan K-12 Team.... All members of the
pproachable. Thanks JIL... for the nice accommodation.
Page 12 of 40
was well planned. Thank you for providing new aircon units. The whole day activities were very helpful in improving
ent in all aspects, a little bit in the food served please try having other menu like vegetables. The program
most especially the facilitators. The program was perfect. No further suggestions. Congratulations to all facilitators,
F management and staff. God will reward you for this. Thank you and Godbless!

nt Team helped identify flaws in the daily operation. Appropriate interventions were identified and implemented

ng Program Provider/Management?

Action Taken by the Program Management Status

lped prevent incurrence of critical incidents.

d at the end of the training program)

ATING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1.0 4.0 )

Program Training
Provision of Support Materials Management Accommodations
Venue
Team

4.00 4.00 3.99 4.00

4.00 4.00 3.97 3.86
3.96 4.00 3.97 3.95
3.97 4.00 3.96 3.94
3.92 4.00 3.89 3.88
3.89 4.00 3.92 3.91
3.95 3.98 3.81 3.75
4.00 4.00 3.99 4.00
4.00 4.00 3.97 4.00

Page 13 of 40
e frequency count beside every major category):

ts or resource speakers helped us (the participants) understand the contents, standards of the K to
the participants to participate actively in the different activities. The trainings suit best to the needs

e we are dealing with 21st century learners. Teachers should really have focus with the manner they

anned very well the training. It was manifested by smooth daily flow of activities from Day 1 to Day 7.
acan!

Marcos M. dela Cruz

SGOD Chief

Page 14 of 40
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 3
SUMMARY OF REGIONAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION
(To be accomplished by the Regional Team Leader)
Title of Training Program:
Region of Program:
Inclusive Dates of Program:
Name of Regional Team Leader:
Mobile Number of Regional Team Leader:
1.What is the general rating of the SESSIONS and FACILITATORS in the training program?

Enter All
training venues Overall Session-Facilitator General Rating General Rating
(inclusive of all Rating
batches)

DAY 1 DAY 2

Bulacan-Cluster 1
(JILCF Inc., Bunlo,
Bocaue, Bulacan)
3.942 -- --

Sessions -- 3.91 3.88

Facilitators -- 3.94 3.89
2 -- --

Sessions --

Facilitators --

3 -- --

Sessions --

Facilitators --

4 -- --

Sessions --

Facilitators --

5 -- --
 Sessions --

Facilitators --

REGIONAL AVERAGE* for Sessions-Facilitators: -- --

*The average rating for sessions and facilitators in ALL venues and batches in your region

Major Observations/Findings (identify SDO/HEI of the training): _______________________________________________________________

2.What is the general rating of the daily PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONS of the training?
General Rating General Rating
Venue of Training
(include ALL Overall Rating
batches) DAY 1 DAY 2

Bulacan-Cluster 1
(JILCF Inc., Bunlo,
Bocaue, Bulacan)
3.885 3.87 3.85

REGIONAL AVERAGE FOR OPERATIONS*: -- --

*Average of Overall Ratings for Operations for ALL venues and batches in your region

Major Observations/Findings (include SDO/HEI of the training):

3.Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program Provider/ Management?
CRITICAL INCIDENT/S BASED ON STAR Training Provider
Action Taken by the Program Management
Status
Major Observations/Findings (identify SDO/HEI of the training): _______________________________________________________________

4.ANALYSIS OF THE END-PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1

Training Venue
Attainment of Delivery of
(include batch Program Management Objectives Content
number)

Bulacan-Cluster 1
(JILCF Inc., Bunlo,
Bocaue, Bulacan)

REGIONAL AVERAGE*
*Average rating for all training venues (inclusive of ALL batches) in the region covering ALL 7 criteria

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback in Program Evaluation for all training venues an

FURTHER LEARNING

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

5.RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM:

6.RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

Submitted by: ____________________________________________ Copy Given to: NEAP Central Office, The Program Managemen
ing program?

Summary of
General Rating General Rating General Rating General Rating Comments and
Suggestions

DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY 6

-- -- -- --

3.96 3.93 3.96 3.93

3.96 3.97 3.98 3.99
-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- --

-- -- -- --
 -- -- -- --

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IONS of the training?

General Rating General Rating General Rating General Rating Summary of
Significant
DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY 6 Comments and
Suggestions

3.88 3.89 3.93 3.89

-- -- -- --

gram Provider/ Management?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

t the end of the training program)

TING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1.0 4.0 )

Program
Provision of Management Training Venue Accommodations
Support Materials Team

on covering ALL 7 criteria

luation for all training venues and batches (include frequency count of responses beside every major category):
ntral Office, The Program Management, The Regional Director
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ry major category):
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue, Pasig City

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN

Provincial Capitol Compound, City of Malolos, Bulacan

MTOT ON-SITE MONITORING Form

BASIC INFORMATION (Monitor)

NAME: ____________________________________ GENDER: ______________
MOBILE #: _________________________________ EMAIL ADDRESS: ___________________

PROGRAM DETAILS
REGION: DIVISION:
CLASS/GROUP SECTION/S MONITORED:
START DATE OF PROGRAM: END DATE OF PROGRAM:
VENUE:
DATE MONITORED:
I. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS
SCHEDULE & PARTICIPANTS STRONGLY STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
MANAGEMENT AGREE DISAGREE
1. Maximum of sixty (60) participants per
classroom
2. Program started on time
3. Program ended on time
4. Attendance was systematically
monitored
5. Ground rules were clear

6. Compliance of ground rules was Monitored

7. Modifications in activities and schedule
were consulted with participants
8. Modifications in activities and schedule
were given ahead of time
STRONGLY STRONGLY
TRAINING SITE/VENUE AGREE DISAGREE
AGREE DISAGREE
1. Adequately lit
2. Well ventilated
3. Adequate soundproofing
4. Comfortable temperature
5. With sufficient space
6. Clean
7. Equipment were serviceable
8. Clean comfort rooms
9. Medical care was available e.g.
common medicines, first aid.
STRONGLY STRONGLY
ACCOMMODATIONS AGREE DISAGREE
AGREE DISAGREE
1. With sufficient space
2. Clean
3. Clean comfort rooms
4. Facilities were in good working order
5. Internet access was usable

STRONGLY STRONGLY
MEALS AGREE DISAGREE
AGREE DISAGREE
1. Satisfactory quality
2. Sufficient quantity
3. Generally healthy
4. Good variety
5. Served on time
STRONGLY STRONGLY
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM AGREE DISAGREE
AGREE DISAGREE
1. Available when needed
2. Courteous
3. Efficient
4. Responsive to needs of participants
5. Conducted daily debriefing sessions
6. Resolved/addressed issues raised in
debriefing sessions
II. SESSIONS AND TRAINERS
STRONGLY STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
AGREE DISAGREE
1. Trainers used approved resource
package (session guide, slide presentation,
videos, etc.)

2. Training/learning materials were adequate

3.Training/learning materials were
given on time
4. Supplies were available
5. Supplies were in good condition

III. QAME SYSTEM

STRONGLY STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
AGREE DISAGREE
1. A quality assurance and monitoring and
evaluation system was in place.
2. Data gathered was used to inform the
management.
3. Issues discussed in debriefing sessions
were resolved/addressed.
IV. Critical Incidents
If you have encountered any remarkable event/situation (either positive or negative) that needs to be detailed here, please
accomplish the STAR Form.

V. Commendable Points/Areas for Improvement

1. Schedule and Participants Management

2. Training Site/Venue
3. Accommodations
4. Meals
5. Program Management Team
6. Sessions and Trainers
7. QAME System
 SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN
Capitol Compound, City of Malolos

K to 12 DIVISION MASS TRAINING OF GRADE 6 TEACHERS

DISTRIBUTION of TRAINING SUPPLIES
Learning Area: Group:

Quantitie Date Received by: Date

ITEMS Remarks
s Received (Print Name pls.) Returned
. Training Kit
-ID, Ballpen,
Notebook & Meal
Tickects
. Teaching Guide
. Learner's Material
. Curriculum Guide
Training Matrix
.
(Tarp)
. Coupon Bonds
. Yellow Pad Paper
. Manila Paper
. Colored Paper
. Glue/Paste
. Scissors*
Stapler & Staple
.
Wire*
. Scotch Tape*
. Crayons*
. Water Color*
. Permanent Pen*
. Training Certificates
Evaluation for
. Discussant by
Participant*
. QAME 1 Analysis
. MTOT-On Site
. Others, Pls. specify
Note:
*This item should be returned to the Incharge of Supplies.

In-charge of Training Supplies

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III-Central Luzon
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN
Capitol Compound, City of Malolos
K to 12 DIVISION MASS TRAINING OF GR
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 2
SUMMARY OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVAL
(to be accomplished by On-Site Team Leade

Title of Training Program: K to 12 DIVISION MASS TRAINING OF GRADE 6 TEACHERS

Learning Service Provider/Division: Schools Division of Bulacan
Region of Program: Region III- Central Luzon
Division/HEI: Schools Division of Bulacan
Venue: Jesus is Lord Colleges Foundation Inc., Bunlo, Bocaue, Bulacan
Inclusive Dates: May 8-14, 2017
Learning Area/s: TLE, Science, Filipino and English
Participants: (No. of Participants and General Description): 715
Name of On-Site Team Leader: Dr. Gregorio C. Quinto, Jr. and Mr. Marcos M. Dela Cruz
Mobile Number of On-Site Team Leader: 09157568571

1. What is the daily overall rating of the sessions and facilitators?

Overall Session-Facilitator
Rating (Average of General General Rating for General Rating for
Day Rating for Sessions and Sessions Facilitators
Facilitators)

1 3.72 3.7 3.74

2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
SITE AVERAGE FOR SESSIONS AND
FACILITATORS:

Page 35 of 40
Major Observations/ Findings: The sessions were successfully delivered by well prepared facilitators who were ma

2. What is the overall rating of the daily PROGRAM MANAGEMENT of the training program?

Day Overall Rating Summary of Significan

Supportive ICT coordinators, Thanks to you. . Keep up the good wo
were well accommodated. The plenary hall is spacious, with many
1 3.65 big screen on stage because the slides are still readable even at the
was well prepared.The food was good. More accessible internet co

2
3
4
5
6
AVERAGE FOR
OPERATIONS

Major Observations/ Findings: Daily evaluation of Program Management Team helped identify flaws in the daily
to eradicate recurrence of such flaws.

3. Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program Provider/Management?

CRITICAL INCIDENT/S BASED ON STAR Training Provider Venue of Training

NONE

Major Observations/Findings: Pre-emptive planning and structuring helped prevent incurrence of critical incide

4. ANALYSIS OF THE END-PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1.

Training
Site/Venue
Attainment of
Program Management Delivery of Content
Objectives
(include class
sections)
SCIENCE (A)
SCIENCE (B)

Page 36 of 40
SCIENCE (C)
MATH (A)
MATH (B)
MATH (C)
EPP (A)
EPP (B)
EPP (C)
SITE AVERAGE*: 0.000
*Average of ALL 7 criteria within a training site/venue
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback (include frequency count beside every m
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING:

FURTHER LEARNING:

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT:

5. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:

6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

Submitted by:

Gregorio C. Quinto, Jr. Marcos M. dela Cru

CID Chief SGOD Chief

Copy Given to: Regional QAME Team Leader

Page 37 of 40
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III-Central Luzon
CHOOLS DIVISION OF BULACAN
Capitol Compound, City of Malolos
MASS TRAINING OF GRADE 6 TEACHERS
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 2
OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
be accomplished by On-Site Team Leader)

OF GRADE 6 TEACHERS

arcos M. Dela Cruz

Summary of Comments and Suggestions

Program management was carried out with efficiency, Commendations are to be given since Day 1 K to
12 seminar went on smoothly, great speaker very knowledgeable, I commend that the seminar is good
enough to enhance our skills as teachers.

Page 38 of 40
by well prepared facilitators who were masters of their respective topics.

the training program?

Summary of Significant Comments and Suggestions

ors, Thanks to you. . Keep up the good work. Well-prepared team. The program was well organized and participants
d. The plenary hall is spacious, with many electric fans but we understand that the weather is really hot. We like the
use the slides are still readable even at the back.The sound system was also loud and clear. The management team
od was good. More accessible internet connections.

nt Team helped identify flaws in the daily operation. Appropriate interventions were identified and implemented

ng Program Provider/Management?

Action Taken by the Program Management Status

lped prevent incurrence of critical incidents.

d at the end of the training program)

ATING PER CRITERIA (Values from 1.0 4.0 )

Program Training
Provision of Support Materials Management Accommodations
Venue
Team

Page 39 of 40
e frequency count beside every major category):

Marcos M. dela Cruz

SGOD Chief

Page 40 of 40