INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS I, II and III

Name of Employee : Name of Rater :

Position : TEACHER III Position : MT-II
Division / Section : DAVAO CITY Date of Review : MARCH 2017
Rating Period : MAY 2016-APRIL 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per RESULTS SCORE
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T Ave

1. Teaching 1.1 Prepared June 10% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Learning and 2016- Submitted daily lesson plan 130% and above of the required 130% of the
Process submitted April with complete parts with number of days DLL/Lesson Plan DLL submitted
(40%) 180 daily 2017 5 SMART objectives. Submitted on time or
lesson plans Objective, Content, before the
and daily Learning Resources, deadline
logs of Remarks and Reflection.
activities Submitted daily lesson plan 115-129% of the required number of Submitted
within the 4 with 5 of the six parts with days DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted one day after
rating period SMART objectives prescribe
(10%) dates
Submitted daily lesson plan 100-114% of the required number of Submitted 2
3 with 4 of the six parts days DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted days after the
prescribe
dates
Submitted daily lesson plan 51-99% of the required number of Submitted 3
2 with 3 of the six parts days DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted days after the
prescribe
dates
Submitted daily lesson plan 50% and below of the required Submitted or
1 with 1 part number of days DLL/Lesson Plan more days
Submitted after the
prescribe
dates
1.2 Facilitated June 10% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
learning in 2016- Instructional Competence 100 % and above the required number All parts of
school/class April shows an Overall Rating of of instructional supervision were the procedure
es evaluated 2017 Five (5) outstanding. observed by the school head/ master were
functional 5 teacher completely
lesson observed
plans/daily during the
logs and allotted time
innovative Instructional Competence 88%-99.99% the required number of All parts of
teaching shows an Overall Rating of instructional supervision were the procedure
strategies Four(4) Very Satisfactory observed by the school head/ master were
through an 4 teacher completely
observer observed
with the use exceeding
of 5min. the
Instructional allotted time
Supervision Instructional Competence 75%-87.99% the required number of All parts of
tool(IST) 1 shows an Overall Rating of instructional supervision were the procedure
Observation Three(3) Satisfactory observed by the school head/ master were
per grading 3 teacher completely
period.(per observed
Div. Memo. exceeding
no.744, 10min. the
s2014) allotted time
(10%) Instructional Competence 63%-74.99% the required number of All parts of
shows an Overall Rating of instructional supervision were the procedure
Two(2) Unsatisfactory observed by the school head/ master were
teacher completely
2 observed
exceeding
15min. the
allotted time

Instructional Competence 62.99% and below the required All parts of

shows an Overall Rating of number of instructional supervision the procedure
One(1) Poor were observed by the school head/ were
1 master teacher completely
observed
exceeding
20min. the
allotted time
 Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
1.3 Implemented June 10% Have made conferences Students were guided in the observation Always
positive discipline 2016- and resolve the issue of of classroom rules and guidelines was monitor the
of students April 5 students with disciplinary 130% evident in the certification from implemented
including 2017 concerns. the Grade Head/ School Guidance rules and
classroom rules, Coordinator/School Head guidelines.
guidelines, Have made conferences Students were guided in the observation Often monitor
individual and and resolve the issue with of classroom rules and guidelines was the
group tasks 4 the Grade Head of 115-129% evident in the certification implemented
within the rating students with disciplinary from the Grade Head/ School Guidance rules and
period concerns. Coordinator/School Head guidelines.
(10%) Have made conferences Students were guided in the observation Seldom
and resolve the issue with of classroom rules and guidelines was monitor the
3 the Grade Head and 100-114% evident in the certification implemented
Guidance Counselor of from the Grade Head/ School Guidance rules and
students with disciplinary Coordinator/School Head guidelines.
concerns.
Have made conferences Students were guided in the observation Sometimes
and resolve the issue with of classroom rules and guidelines was monitor the
2 the Grade Head and 51-99% evident in the certification from implemented
Guidance Counselor and the Grade Head/ School Guidance rules and
School Head for students Coordinator/School Head guidelines.
with disciplinary concerns.
Have made no Students were guided in the observation Never
conferences and did not of classroom rules and guidelines was monitor the
resolve the issue of 50%and below evident in the implemented
1 students with disciplinary certification from the Grade head/ rules and
concerns. School Guidance Coordinator/School guidelines.
Head

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

1.4 Monitored June 5% Conducted interventions Daily attendance of students has been Submitted of
the checking of 2016-
such as ADM, DLP, etc. and carried out (100%) form 2 on or
attendance and it April 5 other similar programs before the
was 100% 2017 -Has Zero dropout in all deadline
systematically
classes handled
carried out
Conducted home visitations Attendance checking was carried out or Submitted 1
through the
to parents of SARDO have submitted only 9 out of 10 Form 2 day after
submission of
4 -Has 1 Dropout of all deadline
Form 2 and Daily
classes handled
attendance of
Conducted school Attendance checking was 100-114% Submitted 2
students. Has
conferences to parents of carried or have submitted only 8 out of days after
Zero dropout
3 SARDO 10 Form 2 deadline
rate. (5%)
-Has 2 Dropouts of all
classes handled
 Identified Students At Risk Attendance checking was carried but Submitted 3
of Dropping out(SARDO) have submitted only 7 out of 10 form2 days after
2 but no action taken deadline
- Have 3 dropouts of all
classes handled
Have no intervention at all Attendance checking was carried out or Submitted 4
-Have 4 or more dropouts have submitted only 6 and below out days or more
1 of all classes handled of 10 Form2 after
deadline

1.5 Monitored June 5% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

safe, positive 2016- Overall (1) physical Monitored attendance, diversity
and motivating April atmosphere,(2) cleanliness appreciation, etc for 100% of school
environment, 2017 and orderliness of days.
overall physical classroom,(3)toilet (4) Organized /Structured Classroom
atmosphere 5 assigned area, (5) proper setting allows for planned teacher- Always
conducive for waste disposal were learner and learner-learner interaction
learning, maintained where cleanliness and orderliness
cleanliness and inside and outside the classroom was
orderliness of observed as (5 )excellent
classrooms Only 4 of the five areas The classroom was observed as (4)
including proper 4 were maintained Very Good Often
waste disposal
daily and was Only 3 of the five areas The classroom was observed as (3)
observed to have 3 were maintained Good Seldom
at least Good(3) Only 2 of the five areas The classroom was observed as (2)
rating every 2 were maintained Basic Sometimes
month within the Only 1 of the five areas The classroom was observed as (1)
rating period 1 were maintained Below Basic Never
(10%)

2.PUPILS 2.1.A Monitored, June 5% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

/Students evaluated, and 2016- Monitoring and Evaluation Evidences showed that the teacher Updated within
Outcomes maintained April of students progress was purposely plans assessments through the rating
(30%) students 2017 5 systematically carried out, submitted (1)Formative/Summative period
progress as without error or revisions Assessment Plans,(2) TQs (3) TOS,
evident in the and (4) Class Record every per
submission of subject/ grading period
reports such as Monitoring and Evaluation Evidences showed that the teacher with one week
(1) Formative / of students progress was submitted only 3 out of 4 indicators lapses
Summative 4 systematically carried out per subject/grading period
Assessment but with one error or
Plans,(2) TQs revision
(3)TOS, and (4)
Class Record Monitoring and Evaluation Evidences showed that the teacher with two weeks
every quarter 3 of students progress was submitted only 2 out of 4 indicators lapses
with in rating the systematically carried out per subject/grading period
period. but with two errors or
(5%) revisions
Monitoring and Evaluation Evidences showed that the teacher with three
2 of students progress was submitted only 1 out of 4 indicators weeks lapses
carried out but with three per subject/grading period
errors or revisions
Monitoring and Evaluation No Evidences showed per grading with four weeks
1 of students progress was period or more lapses
carried out, but with four
errors or revisions

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

2.2 Conducted June 10% Evidences showed that the 130% and above of the students who Conducted 2
remediation / 2016- teacher have conducted were under remediation have weeks before
Intervention April remediation with the improved their performance with a the time frame
programs to 2017 following MOVs passing grade in the Remedial Class of every quarter
improve at least 5 (1)Approve Letter,(2) Mark. (fifth week of
75% of students Attendance Sheet (3)Lesson every quarter)
needing Plan (4) Learning Activity
academic Sheet / assessment tool (5)
assistance .Or Certification from School
Enrichment Head/ School Guidance
activities for Evidences showed that the 115-129%of the students who were Conducted one
students who 4 teacher submitted only 4 under remediation have improved week before the
excel in class. out of 5 indicators their performance with a passing time frame of
(10%) grade in the Remedial Class Mark every quarter
Evidences showed that the 100-114% of the students who were Conducted
3 teacher submitted only 3 under remediation have improved within the time
out of 5 indicators their performance with a passing frame in every
grade in the Remedial Class Mark quarter
Evidences showed that the 85-99% of the students and below Conducted 1
teacher submitted only 2 who were under remediation have week after the
2 out of 5 indicators improved their performance with a time frame in
passing grade in the Remedial Class every quarter
Mark
Evidences showed that the 75-84% and below of the students conducted 2
teacher submitted only 1 and below who were under weeks or more
1 out of 5 indicators remediation have improved their after the time
performance with a passing grade in frame in every
the Remedial Class Mark quarter
2.3 Attained the June 10% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
required NAT 2016- 5% and above increase in 77.97% Submitted
MPS of at least April MPS Grading
70.95% for the 2017 sheets with
SY 2016-2017 . 5 proficiency
(10%) level one
week before
the set date
of submission
of grades
4% increase in MPS 74.46% Submitted
Grading
sheets with
4 proficiency 3
days before
the set date
of submission
of grades
3% increase in MPS 70.95% Submitted
Grading
sheets with
3 proficiency
level on the
set date of
submission of
grades
2% increase in MPS 67.43% Submitted
Grading
sheets with
proficiency
2 level 3 days
after the set
date of
submission of
grades
1% increase in 67.42% and below Submitted
MPS/maintained previous - based on the EFA Target as prescribed Grading
SYs NAT result ,or in the Division Target sheets with
decreased proficiency
1 one week or
more after
the set date
of submission
of grades
 2.4 Attained the June 5% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
required GSA for 2016- Achieved 90-100 GSA 130% of the students passed the Submitted
grade level and April 5 (Outstanding) of all subject at the end of the school year grading Sheet
learning areas, at 2017 students handled ,Class Record
least 75% before the
(Efficiency) of the deadline
students Achieved 85-89 GSA (Very 115-129% of the students passed the Submitted
achieved 4 Satisfactory ) of all students subject at the end of the school year grading Sheet
80%(quality) and handled ,Class Record
above during the
proficiency. deadline
(5%) Achieved 80-84 GSA 100-114% of the students passed the Submitted
3 (Satisfactory) of all students subject at the end of the school year grading Sheet
handled ,Class Record
a day after
the deadline
Achieved 75-79 GSA (Fairly 51-99% of the students passed the Submitted
2 Satisfactory)) of all students subject at the end of the school year grading Sheet
handled ,Class Record
two days after
the deadline
Achieved 74 GSA (Did Not 50% and below passed the subject at Submitted
1 Meet Expectations of all the end of the school year grading Sheet
students handled ,Class Record
more than
two days after
the deadline

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

3.COMMUNI 3.1 Conducted at June 4% Conducted parent Conducted 5 or more PTA meeting and Conducted
TY least 4 parent 2016-
conference with complete parent conferences. conferences
INVOLVEME conferences to April 5 components (Identification 90% parents attendance for four
NT (10%) students needing 2017
of needs /problems, quarters
academic and Causes ,recommendation,
behavioral help. and agreement)
(4%)
Conducted parent Conducted 3-4 PTA meeting and parent 3 out of 4
conference with conferences. parent-
4 documents lacking one 80% parents attendance teachers
components conference
conducted
Conducted parent Conducted 2-3 PTA meeting and 2 out of 4
conference with document parent conferences parent-
3 lacking two components 70% parents attendance teachers
conference
conducted
 Conducted parent Conducted 1 PTA meeting and parent 1 out of 4
conference with document conferences parent-
2 lacking three components 60% parents attendance teachers
conference
conducted
Have not conducted at all Have not conducted at all No parent-
1 teachers
conference
conducted

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

3.2 Conducted at June 2% Accomplishments of set Conducted 6 or more Home visitation Organized
least 4 Home 2016- visits with complete and students were given intervention and facilitated
visitation to April documentation (5 out of 5 and showed a passing grade in the on the
students needing 2017 MOVs-Communication remedial class mark prescribed
academic 5 Letter/Approved Project dates
monitoring and Proposal or Project
follow up within Implementation Program
the rating period /Attendance
(2%) sheet/Financial
Report/Certificate of
appearance/Narrative of
Accomplishment/Report
with picture )
Accomplishments of set Conducted 4-5 Home visitation and Organized
visits with partial students were given intervention and and facilitated
4 documentation showed a passing grade in the remedial one day after
(4 out of 5 MOVs) class mark prescribed
dates
Accomplishments of set Conducted 2-3 Home visitation and Organized
visits with partial students were given intervention and and facilitated
3 documentation showed a passing grade in the remedial two days
(3 out of 5 MOVs) class mark after
prescribed
dates
Accomplishments of set Conducted 1 Home visitation and Organized
visits with partial students were given intervention and and facilitated
2 documentation showed a passing grade in the remedial Three days
(2 out of 5 MOVs) class mark after
prescribed
dates
Accomplishments of set Have not conducted at all Organized
visits with partial and facilitated
1 documentation Four days
(1 out of 5 MOVs or no after
MOVs at all) prescribed
dates
 3.3 Initiated 1 June 2% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
project / Events / 2016- Accomplishments of 130% and above initiated projects /
Activities with April Initiated events / activities conducted
external funding 2017 projects/events/activities Organized
or sponsorship 5 with external and facilitated
within the target funding/sponsorship have on the
date. (2%) complete documentation prescribed
(Activity proposal, dates
Attendance sheet,
Accomplishment Report ,
Certificate of Completion,
Letter and Pictures
Have partial 115-129% initiated projects / events / Organized
documentation with (5 out activities conducted and facilitated
4 of 6 MOVs) one week
after the
prescribed
dates
Have partial 100-114% initiated projects / events / Organized
documentation with 4 out activities conducted and facilitated
3 of 6 MOVs) two weeks
after the
prescribed
dates
Have partial 51-99% initiated projects / events / Organized
documentation with 3 out activities conducted and facilitated
2 of 6 MOVs three weeks
after the
prescribed
dates
Have partial 50% and below initiated projects / Organized
documentation with 2 and events / activities conducted and facilitated
1 below MOVs four weeks or
more after
the
prescribed
dates

4.PROFESSI 4.1 Conducted 1 June 2% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

ONAL action research 2016-
Action Research conducted Submitted the
GROWTH based on April with full documentation Conducted one action research full paper on
(10%) students need 2017
5 and recognized by the or before
analysis using Master Teacher/School December
only 1-5 Action
Head
Research
Template. (2%)
 Action Research conducted Submitted the
4 with full documentation Submitted Action Research proposal full paper on
recognized by the Master or before
Teacher/School Head. January
Action Research conducted Parts are missing or not fully discussed. Submitted the
3 with full documentation Submitted Action Research problem. full paper on
recognized by the other or before
teacher. February
Identified Parts are missing or not fully discussed. Submitted the
2 classroom/learning Submitted intention to conduct full paper on
problems with research research with in the rating period or before
proposals. March
No action research. No paper at all. No paper
1 Have not conducted at all. No intention/plan to conduct Action submitted
Research. within the
year

4.2 Attended at May 4% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

least 4 2016-
seminars/training April Attended at the Attended at least four (4) Arrived at the
at the school, 2017 International or National seminars/trainings /workshop venue on or
cluster and 5 level (seminars relevant to before the
division level, the assigned task/subject activity started
region, and or expertise)
national level Attended at 1 regional level Attended at least three (3) Arrived at the
within the rating 4 / 2 division level seminars/trainings /workshop venue 5 minutes
period after the activity
(4%) started
Attended at 1 division level Attended at least two (2) Arrived at the
/ (2 district level) / (3 seminars/trainings /workshop venue 10
3 school level ) minutes after
the activity
started
Attended at 1 district level Attended at least one (1) Arrived at the
/ (2 school level) seminars/trainings /workshop venue 15
2 minutes after the
activity started
Attended at the school Have not attended at all Arrived at the
level venue 20
1 minutes and
beyond after the
activity started
 4.3. Submitted June 2% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
100% of the 2016- Reports submitted are Submitted and accomplished 130% and Submitted on
required forms April 5 100% free from errors above the required forms and reports. or before the
and reports, as 2017 deadline
prescribed by the Required forms and reports Submitted and accomplished 115-129% Submitted
school (2%) 4 were accomplished with and above the required forms and one day after
one error reports the deadline
Required forms and reports Submitted and accomplished 100-114% Submitted
3 were accomplished with and above the required forms and two days after
two errors reports the deadline
Required forms and reports Submitted and accomplished 51-99% Submitted
2 were accomplished with and above the required forms and three days
three errors reports after the
deadline
Required forms and reports Submitted and accomplished 50% and Submitted
1 were accomplished with 4 below of the required forms and four days or
or more errors reports more after
the deadline

5. SUPPORT 5.1 Submitted 10 June 3% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

TO DTRs/CSC Form 2016-
Without error / erasures 10 DTRs/Form 48 were submitted On the first
ADMINISTR 48 (in a School April and / or lacking (June-March) day of the
ATIVE Year) every 3rd 2017
5 attachments succeeding
FUNCTION day of the month
(10%) succeeding
With 1 error / erasure and 10 DTRs/Form 48 were submitted On the
month without
/or lacking attachments (June-March) second day of
error and with
4 the
complete
succeeding
attachments
month
(3%)
With 2 errors/erasures and 10 DTRs/Form 48 were submitted On the third
/ or lacking attachments (June-March) day of the
3 /with 1 EFLF succeeding
month
With 3 errors/erasures and 9 DTRs/Form 48 were submitted (June- On the fourth
/ or lacking attachments March) day of the
2 succeeding
month
With 4 or more 8 and below DTRs/Form 48 were On the fifth
1 errors/erasures and / or submitted (June-March) day of the
lacking attachments succeeding
month
5.2 Complied 180 June 4% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
days of 2016- Incurred no Reported 130% and above days to Arrived 15
attendance April tardiness/undertime school/mandated meetings/special minutes
without tardiness 2017 5 activities before the
and/or official time
undertime and Incurred 1 tardy or 1 under Reported 115-129% days to Arrived 10-14
reports on time time for personal reasons school/mandated meetings/special minutes
(4%) 4 activities before the
official time
Incurred 2 tardiness/under Reported 100-114 % to Arrived 9-5
time (or combination) for school/mandated meetings/special minutes
3 personal reasons activities before the
official time
Incurred 3-5 tardiness/ Reported 51-99% to school/mandated Arrived 4-3
undertime (or combination) meetings/special activities minutes
2 for personal reasons before the
official time
Incurred 6 or more Reported 50% and below days to Arrived on the
1 tardiness/ undertime (or school/mandated meetings/special exact time
combination) for personal activities
reasons

5.3 Worn June 2% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

complete set of 2016- Wear complete prescribed 100% of the required days in a quarter Five times a
prescribed April 5
uniform/dress code week
uniform (ID, 2017
One element 95-99% of the required days in a Four times a
Blouse/Polo,
4 missing(e.g.no ID) quarter week
Slacks/Skirt,
Two elements missing 90-94% of the required days in a Thrice a week
Footwear) during
3 quarter
required days
3 or more elements missing 85-89% of the required days in a Twice a week
2 quarter
Not wearing prescribed 84% or less of the required days in a Once a week
1
uniform quarter
6. SPECIAL 6.1 Subject June 5% Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
TASK Coordinatorship 2016- 130% and above 130 % and above the required number Within a year
ASSIGNMEN - School April monitored/supervised any of monitored/supervised any activities
T (IF WITH Inspectorate 2017 5 activities related to with full documentation report on
PLUS - SBM _________ with full completion.
FACTOR THE Coordinator documentation report on
FOLLOWING -GSP/BSP Coor. completion.
PERCENTAG -Nutrition Coor. 115-129% _______ 115-129% the required number of Within a year
E WILL BE -Kawan/Langkay 4 accomplishment with monitored/supervised any activities
ADAPTED Coor. partial with partial documentation report on
ACCORDING -School Guidance completion.
LY: -DRRM Coor. 100-114% ________ 100-114% the required number of Within a year
KRA- 3 -7.5% -LIS/E-BEIS Coor. 3 initiated only with no initiated only with no documentation
KRA- 4- 7.5% -Brigada Eskwela documentation report report
KRA- 5-10% -Culture/Arts 51-99% _____ initiated only 51-99% the required number of Within a year
KRA -6- 5% Coor. 2 without completion report initiated only without completion
-Star Coordinator report
-School Clinic 1 No completion report No report submitted Within a year
Incharge
-CPP Coor.
-GAD Coordinator
-School Physical
Facilities Coor.
-School Librarian
-Biometric
Incharge

OVERALL
RATING
FOR
ACCOMPLI
SHMENTS

__________________ _________________________ _____________________

MT II / Rater Ratee PRINCIPAL II
APPROVING AUTHORITY