You are on page 1of 4

23rd International Symposium on Transport Phenomena

Auckland, New Zealand


1922 November 2012

Experimental Study on the Critical Friction Velocity for Wind-brown Sand


with High-speed Visualization and PIV Measurement

K. Sugiyama, K. Otakeguchi, F.S. Yang, T. Tsukahara, and Y. Kawaguchi


1
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Tokyo University of Science, Yamazaki 2641, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan

Abstract saltation come to rest as the mainstream velocity decreases. In


this study, we focus attention on the threshold value of the pickup
Transport phenomena of dispersible solid particles in the air (friction) velocity for the saltation. As reported by Bagnold [1],
by turbulence are encountered in various situations. In order to the threshold value of the pickup velocity is known to depend on
obtain an empirical equation for the critical friction velocity as a the size of particles. For large particles of dp > 50 m, the
function of important parameters relating to the wind-blown sand, threshold increases with the increase of particles size. On the
we performed observation experiments on movements of each other hand, higher speed velocity is needed for smaller particles
particle using a high-speed camera and an argon laser, and than 0.08 mm to be in the saltation. This is because some
obtained turbulence statistics by PIV (particle image velocimetry). cohesive forces (such as inter-particle electrostatic force, van der
The critical friction velocity was conventionally predicted based Waals attraction, and capillary force) between particles [2,4].
on the density and the diameter of sand grains. In addition to One of general procedures to determine the critical friction
those particle parameters, we have quantitatively considered the velocity is, for instance, the manner described following.
dependency on the turbulence intensity of turbulent boundary Cabrejos & Klinzing [2,3] conducted experiments in a circular
layers. pipe, in which a layer of sand bed was eroded by the air stream
while the average velocity was higher than the critical velocity.
Nomenclature As the thickness of the sand-bed layer reduced gradually during
dp nominal mean particle diameter the running, the air velocity decelerated and hardly transported
g gravitational acceleration much sand particles. Then they estimated the critical velocity
Hb height of roughness block from the air speed at which the particles would be static. Kalman
Re Reynolds number [5] measured the flux of wind-blown sand using the wind tunnel
Tu turbulence intensity averaged in boundary layer of a rectangular cross section and estimated the critical velocity
U main-stream velocity in the same way with Cabrejos & Klinzing. These measurements
URMS turbulent intensity (root-mean-square of streamwise of the threshold value can be regarded as an indirect method.
velocity fluctuation) In this study, we carefully (and directly) observed movements
Uct critical friction velocity of each saltation particle using a high-speed camera and an argon
laser. The critical friction velocity has been predicted as the
boundary layer thickness
function of several parameters, such as, the density and the
displacement thickness
diameter of particles. Furthermore, we here have considered the
g gas (air) density
turbulence on the sand bed. To discuss the influence of character
p particle density of turbulence on the critical friction velocity, we changed
arbitrarily the magnitude of the turbulent intensity in the
Introduction boundary layer by roughness blocks composed of short square
Transport phenomena of dispersible solid particles in the air pillars.
by turbulence are encountered in various situations, such as sand
erosion, yellow sand, dust storm, and pulverized coal storage. For Outline of experiments
the aim to avoid/control scattering of particles from sand bed, the Wind Tunnel
critical friction velocity is one of the important parameters
relating to the physics of the wind-blown sand movement. Our experiments were conducted by using a rectangular wind
The wind moves the sand particles in one, or a combination, tunnel with a test section of dimensions 0.25 m 0.25 m. The
of three ways: suspension, saltation, or creep. The saltation is a experimental setup is depicted in Figure 1. The developing
movement such that sand particle jump to another place in a short section with 1000 mm length in the streamwise length was set
time. This is the most important process in the formation after the blower and rectification part, while the test section was
dynamics of a ripple and other sand features. The suspension is a of 3000 mm long. The upper wind-tunnel surface of each section
flight dynamics of a very fine grain. The surface creep is the was movable, so that the mean pressure gradient was kept at zero
rolling process on the sand bed. These types of sand movement throughout the wind tunnel. The measurement (or visualization)
are conventionally determined by the diameter of sand particles area was positioned at 1250 mm downstream (from the entrance
and flow field conditions [1]. of the test section), where the particle source, i.e., sand bed, was
The criteria in terms of a minimum friction velocity to induce set up. To avoid disturbance into the flow field, the surface of the
the particle saltation would be defined in two different ways [2- particle source was initially parallel to the bottom floor.
3]: one is as the pickup velocity, at which a particle at rest begins The maximum nominal air velocity, i.e., the air speed outside
to move as the mainstream velocity increases gradually; the other the boundary layer, in the wind tunnel is 20 m/s and its minimum
is the saltation velocity, at which flying particles in the motion of relative turbulent intensity is 0.05%. As our preliminary work
[6,7], we investigated the wind-speed threshold for sand spherical grains. Their non-uniform sizes and shapes of each
movement on a sand dune using the same wind tunnel, changing particle resulted in a wide distribution of particle size: the root-
the mainstream velocity from U = 5.1 m/s to 8.5 m/s during the mean-square of diameter is also shown in Table 1. For instance,
experiment. They reported that erosion of sand bed would occur Sand#7 has averagely large sand grains.
at U = 7.1 m/s; when the wind was as low as 5.1 m/s, no sand To investigate the dependency on the particle density, we
movement would take place; for 8.5 m/s, strong erosion was employed two kinds of glass beads that have more uniformed
induced on every place around the dune. These situations are particle size and spherical shape, but with different densities. In
consistent with a field measurement by Mikami et al. [8]. They the case labelled as Glass-H, the particles possessed a density
presented a threshold wind velocity of 7.5 m/s in the Taklimakan larger by more than 60% compared to the other test particles. The
Desert, where serious environmental damage are induced by the density of Glass-L was comparable to the silica sand.
wind-blown sand movements. In the present work, the tested air-
phase velocity of the mainstream ranged between U = 5 and 9
m/s and this magnitude was comparable to the actual situation. RMS of
Particle dp (m) p (kg/m3)
diameter (m)
Sand#7 292 2.59103 96.8
Silica
Sand#8 159 2.59103 98.2
sand
Sand#9 50.4 2.56103 45.3
Glass Glass-L 111 2.50103 20.5
beads Glass-H 108 4.20103 14.3
Table 1. Material characteristic of particles.

The sand bed as a particle-source area was irradiated by the


Figure 1. Schematic representation of experimental set up used argon laser sheet (2.53.0 W) from the upper side, and sand
for visualization to investigate the critical friction velocity. particle would be visualized. The spread angle of laser sheet was
set at 20 and its thickness was about 1 mm. Reflection of flying
particles was taken by high-speed camera that was set on side of
Roughness to Modulate Turbulence Intensity the wind tunnel. The frame rate was chosen at 500 fps with a
shutter speed of 1/1500 sec. In the experiments, each saltating
In the developing section, regularly-spaced roughness blocks
particle from the sand bed was detected with increasing the wind
were installed on the bottom surface to induce a rapid growth of
velocity gradually. By adopting such a visualization to detect the
turbulent boundary layer. We tested two types of roughness with
start of sand movement and measure the critical friction velocity
different heights and block patterns, as shown in Figure 2. Cubic
directly rather than an indirect measurement in terms of blown-
blocks of 10 mm side were regularly distributed with a pitch of
sand flux, we were enabled to extract only the saltation so that
45 mm (Case 1), while higher cuboidal blocks were used with a
the critical friction velocity for particle to fly from the sand bed
rather sparse array in the other case (Case 2). As described later,
would be determined without confusing rolling particles.
more developed turbulent boundary layer with high turbulence
After the visualization experiments, we separately measured
intensity was found in the case of the higher-block array, Case 2.
wall-normal distributions of the mean streamwise velocity and of
It might be suggested that the height Hb of the roughness block is
the turbulent intensity for the single-phase air flow under the
a dominant parameter to determine the turbulence intensity at the
condition of the critical state (that means the friction velocity was
measurement area (far downstream of the developing section).
equal to the critical value), using PIV. We used an Nd:YAG laser
and a CCD camera with a resolution of 2048 2 pixels. For more
Case1 Case2
45 mm 180 mm details regarding the PIV system, one can refer to our previous
paper [6]. The position to measure the statistics is the same with
that for the above visualization, namely, at 1250 mm, and an
Air 45 mm Air 45 mm observation area was 110 mm 110 mm in which 127 127
z z velocity vectors were obtained. The statistical result presented
x x here are the data averaged in the streamwise direction with
Developing section Developing section respect to the observation area. Note that we assumed that the
streamwise variation of statistics due to the boundary layer
Figure 2. Alignment of roughness blocks. Each block has a development would be sufficiently small to be neglected. The
constant height of 10 mm (in Case 1) or of 40 mm (in Case 2). present Reynolds number based the momentum thickness were
ranged in Re
Since a major focus in this study is placed on the proposal of
a relational expression between the turbulent-flow characteristics Result and Discussion
and the critical friction velocity. By performing experiments on
Turbulence Intensity
the two different air-phase conditions in terms of the turbulence
intensity, we would consider the dependence of U ct on the Although it is intuitively reasonable to presuppose that the
turbulent flow as well as the sand-particle characteristics. critical friction velocity should be influenced by flow condition
only near the sand-bed surface, we adopted an integral quantity
Test Particles and Measurement Methodology defined by equation (1) as an indicator of magnitude of the
turbulence contribution. This is because the turbulence intensity
Experiments to determine the critical friction velocity were
becomes zero asymptotically, since the non-slip condition is
carried out with several materials as sand particles (see Table1).
basically assumed on the wall surface. In this study, we chose the
Three different nominal diameter of silica sand were tested: they
streamwise turbulence intensity for a turbulence statistic that
have the practically-same density p and are basically of non-
dominantly would affect on the particle saltation.
Case 1 and Case 2. For Case 2, where Tu/U is large, the critical
(1) friction velocities of each particle can be clearly seen to be lower
than those for Case1. The difference in the results between Case
It is worthwhile at the outset to observe the dependences of Tu on 1 and Case 2 as well as deviations from the empirical correlations
the mainstream velocity and the roughness-block patterns. should imply the necessity of consideration of different turbulent
background flows.
Obtained values of Tu at given experimental conditions (Hb and
U) are presented in Figure 3. The discrete data plotted in the 0.4
graph were those obtained at the air-phase flow attaining the Case1 (Tu/U=0.08)
critical friction velocity for each kind of test particles. We found Case2 (Tu/U=0.1)
0.35
that Tu varied linearly with U, at least in the present range of the Bagnold (1941)
experiment. Therefore, in this work, Tu/U may be expressed as Chepil (1956)
following for each case of the roughness patterns: 0.3

U,ct [m/s]
Sand#7
Glass-L
(2) 0.25
Sand#8

1 0.2
Sand#9
Hb=10 mm (Case 1)
0.8 Hb=40 mm (Case 2) 0.15
20 40 100 200 400 1000
dp [m]
Tu [m/s]

0.6
Figure 5. Critical friction velocity as a function of particle
U
0.4 0.1 diameter. Also shown are empirical correlationUfunctions by
ct=A{(s-a / a)gd}
1/2

existing experimental studies [1,9]. Bagnold(1941) Hb=1


8U Chepil(1945) Hb=4
0.2 0.0 Here, we may suppose theChepil(1945)
following
functions for the friction
velocity and the turbulence intensity of the air-phase flow at the
0 critical state for the saltation, based on the parameters given
0 2 4 6 8 10 explicitly in the experiments:
U [m/s]

Figure 3. Mainstream velocity versus integrated turblence (3)


intensity for different roughness block heights. (4)
The subscript of ct represents the critical value. It must be not
adequate to include a non-local parameter in the equation which
Observation of Particle Saltation will determine the physics locally, the parameter of Hb should be
Figure 4 presents a typical picture of one flying particle at the eliminated from equations (3) and (4). Therefore, in the following
critical friction velocity. The picture was made by composion of discussion, let us consider an equation for U,ct including Tu, as
several succesive pictures taken at every 1/500 sec. In the figure, follows
a thick horizontal line represents the sand-bed surface illuminated
strongly by the laser sheet. According to the present result of (5)
careful observations, particles saltaton occurred spontaneously
For non-dimensionalization of the physical quantities, we would
from their rest satates not triggered by impingement of suspended
employ three terms in the forms of
partilces from the upstream. The saltating particles such as one
presented in Figure 4, which were caused by the excess of wind
velocity over the critical friction velocity, were found to be flown
(6)
with revealing low orbits.
y In Figure 6, the critical friction velocity U,ct is replotted
x against the particle mean diameter dp, but both are dimensionless
y
and the value of U,ct is normalized by Tu2. The multiplication by
x 10 mm
the turbulence intensity may be reasonablealthough the index
y number of 2 has no physical interpretation, since the critical
x
Particle source (sand-bed region) friction velocities obtained for Case 1 exceeded those for Case 2
in all cases. As a result, both Case 1 and Case 2 reveal a single
fitting line that describes an equation
Figure 4. Picture of a visualized particle (Glass-L) that jumpes
from the sand bed. Taken at every 1/500 sec.
(7)
Study on Critical Friction Velocity
irrespective of the magnitude of Tu/U. Moreover, an relational
Figure 5 presents the critical friction velocity U,ct for each
expression that U increases with dp0.5 is also derived from
kind of particle against the average particle size dp in the
horizontal axis. It can be seen that the silica sand particle roughly equation (7) and agrees well with the equation by Bagnold [1].
follows the empirical function proposed by Chepil [9]. Every
particle has exhibited different critical friction velocities between
105 15
Case1 (Tu /U = 0.08) Case1 (Tu /U=0.08)
Case2 (Tu /U = 0.1) Case2 (Tu /U=0.1)

Predicted U,ct /(gdp)0.5


U,ct (Tu ) /gdp

104 10
2

103 1 5
1
Glass-H

102 -3 0
10 10-2 10-1
dp/ 0 5 10 15
0.5
Measured U,ct /(gdp)
Figure 6. Critical friction velocity multiplied by squared mean
turblent intensity versus dimensionless particle diameter. Figure 7. Comparison between measured and predicted values for
critical friction velocity.
Next, the density ratio between solid and air phases would be
considered. In the present work, the same-size particles with References
different densities were limited to the glass particles of Glass-L
and Glass-H. Hence, a high-order function could not be proposed [1] Bagnold, R.A., The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes,
with respect to p/g from the present experiment. Cabrejos & Dover publications, Inc., (1956).
Clinzing [3] carried out experiments to determine pickup velocity [2] Cabrejos, F.J. and Klinzing, G.E., Incipient Motion of Solid
of a wide variety of materials and proposed the equation of Particles in Horizontal Pneumatic Conveying, Powder Tech.,
72, 1992, 5161.
[3] Cabrejos, F.J. and Klinzing, G.E., Pickup and Saltation
(8)
Mechanisms of Solid Particles in Horizontal Pneumatic
Transport, Powder Tech., 79, 1994, 173186.
From equations (7) and (8), we obtain
[4] Hayden, K.S., Park, K., and Curtis, J.S., Effect of Particle
Characteristics on Particle Pickup Velocity, Powder Tech.,
131, 2003, 714.
(9)
[5] Kalman, H., Satran, A., Meir, D., and Rabinovich, E., Pickup
(Critical) Velocity of Particles, Powder Tech, 160, 2005,
Then, U,ct can be predicted if the coefficient is known. In order
103113.
to determine a priori, U,ct calculated using equation (9) were [6] Tsukahara, T., Sakamonot, Y., Aoshima, D., Yamamoto, M.,
compared with those obtained directly by the experiments. Figure and Kawaguchi, Y., Visualization and Laser Measurements
7 shows the result of comparison with = 0.065. A symbol on the Flow Field and Sand Movement on Sand Dunes with
each symbol represents different kind of particlesclose to the Porous Fences, Exp. Fluids, 52, 2012, 877890.
solid line in the figure implies a good prediction in terms of the [7] Sakamoto, Y., Shimazu, S., Tsukahara, T., Yamamoto, M.,
critical friction velocity. Actually, the predictions are found to be and Kawaguchi, Y., Control of Sand Movement on Model
Dune by Fence Installation: Experimental Study by
in good agreement with the experimental results in most of cases.
Visualization and LDV. Proc. of the Sixth Int. Symp. on
It is worth to note that the critical friction velocity for Glass-H, Multiphase Flow, Heat Mass Transfer and Energy
whose density is about twice as high as the others, can be also Conversion, Xian, China, Jul. 1115, 2009, ET-01 (CD-
predicted well. This demonstrates the validity of equation (8). ROM).
[8] Mikami, M. et al. Aeolian Dust Experiment on Climate
Conclusions Impact: an Overview of JapanChina Joint Project ADEC.
Global Planet Change, 52, 2006, 142172.
We measured the critical friction velocity for the wind-blown [9] Chepil, W.S., Influence of Moisture on Erodibility of Soil by
sand saltation in turbulent boundary layers over flat sand bed, by Wind, Soil Science Soc. of America J., 20, 1956, 288292.
means of visualization using an argon laser sheet, and a high-
speed camera. Several experiments were performed to determine
the dependencies of the critical friction velocity on the turbulence
contribution, the particle diameter, and the particle density. We
chose the streamwise turbulence intensity (measured by PIV
separately) integrated in the wall-normal direction as the
indicator of contribution of turbulence. The equation we would
propose in this paper is given in equation (9). Although further
experiments for the validation of the empirical equation in a wide
range of parameters pertaining to the air flow and the particle, we
successfully took into account interaction with the turbulence
(intensity) affecting the critical friction velocity.

You might also like