The fear which installed in the sense of how to control the desires of the woman, for these

being unlimited, equal to the power of the creator, it was previously thought in an
intelligent way. This intelligent way was revoked, the clause which follows, and this is also
its interpretation, the desires of the woman can only be regulated by love, but this would
also generate incomprehension, in a way that, for the understanding, its the natural
fluxes, the saudade [to miss] comes and the saudade goes: it follows the path of
pain. The desires are never alone, because theres nothing alone on nature: the will
and the pleasure would always be over the table, discussing the sexual problems:
the only point they would reach is the extraction of the judgement. And the sex is
something that never existed, except for the concept of moral.

The Nature disconsiders such understanding, just as the firmament is called

heaven. In a way that the image that follows is an interpretation. In a way thats
about a judgement that will be never fulfilled, of which reactive effect is its own
destruction. The essentialities of the woman will not be destroyed, as the earth will not
be transformed into ground.

What the human being called Unity is about an interdimension.

The Love will never be treated as an object of the contract.

The Nature thanks the broken of the virtue, it was never natural.

The addiction is the judge of the pleasure

66 what is the man and what is the woman, a receptacle of a juridical ordainment, or
personal observants of themselves?

Its a human puzzle, its that girl that you ate than you threw out because you didnt like:
Man and woman it`s a conditioning, an obligation, a result, a purpose: and this is all thats
known about man and woman.

For this, marriage doesnt exist, because both dont belong to each other, they do not
possess one another. For this, love is a funny answer, a joke, which one cannot take
seriously.

Its as the one in the flesh must be understood, as the fingers and the hand, that, if theyre
together, both will belong to the body: but theyll be separated by an institution.

This is not natural.

The Love is not a store of social increments, where that which one dresses is a common
well, love is undressed.

66.

The four essentialities of nature were so configured as:

THE SEX THE CONTACT THE DESIRE THE SMELL THE TASTE THE
PLEASURE THE WILL.

The desire the sin

The pleasure the suffering

The will an obligation

About the sex, the contact is superficial. One must question itself, the contact and its
unidimensionality, the bodies. Example: God and Virgin Mary, what kind of contact was
that[?]

Desire, understood as sin, the betrayal: who desires, desires another body: this is the
concept of Unidimension: and, for this, every desire is sex. For such understanding,
desire was that which was forbidden.

In the same way, how must it be understood the contact in Christ? Could it be understood
as a sexual contact? Is it possible to touch Christ and be touched by him? And will he be
present when we touch in someone else? Will he be touching too?

The pleasure is understood as the will which sex is not present: for this, the pleasure with
God is not sexual. In a way that God had no pleasure with Mary: at the same time,
misunderstands that there was no desire: the smell was stepped away of the desires for
a most simple question: if someone didnt like the smell of Christ: he could have a bad
smell. You would answer, Christ has no smell at all, and Id reply, Thats why theres no
desire in Christ.

In the Nature, that which has no smell has no flavor .. And if it has no flavor, it has no
taste.

The taste: the will. Example: Eve, what did she felt when she touched the apple? What
was the smell, what the taste, what the flavor? That was tasty, for this, she offered to
Adam. And for this, she committed a sin. The nature was judged by its essentialities.
The woman is already born possessed, to dispossess her its the question. So, come
back, follow the story and also the Judgement of the Desire , which is the official
jurisprudence of the Law against the moral, that, which defends the prostitution. Its not
about a matter of freedom: as it was already said, this one is about a separation.
Questions quite simple: if youre going to masturbate on the bathroom, take someone
with you: you will see that the pleasure is different. The only one who hides its the sex:
And when this happens, love will be absent.

The jurisprudence of the law approaches complex questions such as posse and property.
its realization: whats its impact over the woman and over the nature, and the
consequences for man, for virtue and all its concept of beauty.

Dispossess the Nature, and shell dispossess you.

The love happened. But it was looked for another explanation: It was a Creation