You are on page 1of 4

GET

FILE='C:\Users\NB\Desktop\Metode Kuantitatif\Multivariate_Data_Analysis_7e_Datasets_and_Documentation\HBAT_200.sav'.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
GLM x19 x20 BY x2
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=x2(BONFERRONI GH)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(x2)
/PRINT=DESCRIPTIVE OPOWER HOMOGENEITY
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=x2.

General Linear Model

[DataSet1] C:\Users\NB\Desktop\Metode Kuantitatif\Multivariate_Data_Analysis_7e_Datasets_and_Documentation\HBAT_200.sav

Warnings

Post hoc tests are not performed for X2 - Industry Type because there are fewer than
three groups.

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N
X2 - Industry Type 0 Magazine
industry 100
1 Newsprint 100
industry

Descriptive Statistics

X2 - Industry Type Mean Std. Deviation N


X19 - Satisfaction Magazine industry 7.044 1.2069 100
Newsprint industry 6.860 1.2738 100
Total 6.952 1.2411 200
X20 - Likely to Magazine industry 6.958 1.1031 100
Recommend
Newsprint industry 6.947 1.0678 100
Total 6.953 1.0829 200

Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matricesa


Box's M .941
Tests the null hypothesis that the observed covariance matrices of the dependent
variables are equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + x2

Page 1
Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matricesa
F .310
df1 3
df2 7.057E6
Sig. .818
Tests the null hypothesis that the observed covariance matrices of the dependent
variables are equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + x2

Multivariate Testsc

Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.


Intercept Pillai's Trace .977 4.202E3 a
2.000 197.000 .000
Wilks' Lambda .023 4.202E3 a
2.000 197.000 .000
Hotelling's Trace 42.663 4.202E3 a
2.000 197.000 .000
Roy's Largest Root 42.663 4.202E3 a
2.000 197.000 .000
x2 Pillai's Trace .012 1.180 a 2.000 197.000 .309
Wilks' Lambda .988 1.180 a
2.000 197.000 .309
Hotelling's Trace .012 1.180 a 2.000 197.000 .309
Roy's Largest Root .012 1.180 a
2.000 197.000 .309
a. Exact statistic
b. Computed using alpha = .05
c. Design: Intercept + x2

Multivariate Testsc

Noncent. Observed
Effect Parameter Power b
Intercept Pillai's Trace 8404.621 1.000
Wilks' Lambda 8404.621 1.000
Hotelling's Trace 8404.621 1.000
Roy's Largest Root 8404.621 1.000
x2 Pillai's Trace 2.360 .257
Wilks' Lambda 2.360 .257
Hotelling's Trace 2.360 .257
Roy's Largest Root 2.360 .257
a. Exact statistic
b. Computed using alpha = .05
c. Design: Intercept + x2

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

F df1 df2 Sig.


X19 - Satisfaction .232 1 198 .631
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal
across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + x2

Page 2
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

F df1 df2 Sig.


X20 - Likely to
Recommend .030 1 198 .863
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal
across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + x2

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Type III Sum


Source Dependent Variable of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model X19 - Satisfaction 1.693 a 1 1.693 1.099 .296
X20 - Likely to
Recommend .006 c 1 .006 .005 .943
Intercept X19 - Satisfaction 9666.061 1 9666.061 6.278E3 .000
X20 - Likely to
Recommend 9667.451 1 9667.451 8.203E3 .000
x2 X19 - Satisfaction 1.693 1 1.693 1.099 .296
X20 - Likely to
Recommend .006 1 .006 .005 .943
Error X19 - Satisfaction 304.846 198 1.540
X20 - Likely to
Recommend 233.353 198 1.179
Total X19 - Satisfaction 9972.600 200
X20 - Likely to
Recommend 9900.810 200
Corrected Total X19 - Satisfaction 306.539 199
X20 - Likely to
Recommend 233.359 199
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = .000)
b. Computed using alpha = .05
c. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.005)

Page 3
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Noncent. Observed
Source Dependent Variable Parameter Power b
Corrected Model X19 - Satisfaction 1.099 .181
X20 - Likely to
Recommend .005 .051
Intercept X19 - Satisfaction 6278.178 1.000
X20 - Likely to
Recommend 8202.842 1.000
x2 X19 - Satisfaction 1.099 .181
X20 - Likely to
Recommend .005 .051
Error X19 - Satisfaction
X20 - Likely to
Recommend
Total X19 - Satisfaction
X20 - Likely to
Recommend
Corrected Total X19 - Satisfaction
X20 - Likely to
Recommend
a. R Squared = .006 (Adjusted R Squared = .000)
b. Computed using alpha = .05
c. R Squared = .000 (Adjusted R Squared = -.005)

Estimated Marginal Means


X2 - Industry Type

95% Confidence Interval


Dependent Variable X2 - Industry Type Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
X19 - Satisfaction Magazine industry 7.044 .124 6.799 7.289
Newsprint industry 6.860 .124 6.615 7.105
X20 - Likely to Magazine industry 6.958 .109 6.744 7.172
Recommend
Newsprint industry 6.947 .109 6.733 7.161

Page 4

You might also like