You are on page 1of 17

J.Aqua.biol.(2010).

25(1)231-248

IMPACT OF AQUACULTURE AND INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION ON THE CHANGES OF


GROUNDWATER STATUS IN THE COASTAL REGION OF THE NELLOREDISTRICT A.P.

G. Ravanaiah and C.V.Narasimha murthy*,


Department of Zoology
Jawahar Bharati Degree and P.G. College,
Kavali-524201, Andhra Pradesh. E-mail: cvnmurthy.jb@gmail.com

* Jawahar Bharati Degree and P.G. College, Kavali - 524201, A.P.

Abstract :

Ground water pollution has become rampant in the recent past due to sea water intrusion,
industrial effluent discharge and due to agricultural activities (TWAD 1998). In the present study
an attempt is made to elucidate the impact of aquaculture and industrial pollution on the changes
of ground waterstatus in the coastal region of the Nellore district A.P For the ground water study, three
zones were selected in the villages in and around Nellore district. Each zone consists of seven
villages. Zone A is in the Nellore urban and within 0.5 km radius from the Industrial complex.
One of its sides it is having sewage canal and Pennar estuary. Zone B is within a radius of 0.5 to
1.5 km away from the complex at Sullurpeta. It is a semi urbanized Zone. Zone is within a radius
of 1.5 to 3.0 km away from the Kavali town. It is purely a rural Zone. Intensive agricultural
activities were well evidenced in this Zone. It is not at all influenced by the said pollution sources
for zone A.

The results of the physico-chemical parameters and heavy metals of all three Zones were
analysed and compared with the drinking water standards .The pH , BOD, COD, total hardness,
Ca++ and Mg++ were high during monsoon and low during summer seasons, at all the three
zones, whereas, groundwater temperature, chloride and fluoride were high during summer and
low during monsoon seasons, indicating temporal variations. In contrast, nutrients, total
alkalinity and heavy metals showed spatio-temporal variations.

From these results, it is very clear that all the observed physico-chemical characteristics and
heavy metals were many-folds higher in the groundwater at Zone A than at Zones B and rain and
industrial pollution plays a major role in the variation of characteristics of groundwater.

Key words: Aquaculture Industrial pollution, Ground - water quality, Nellore district.

Introduction: Andhra Pradesh State varies from place to place


depending on topography, lithology, climatic
Groundwater resources are very important for conditions, rainfall, etc. Apart from natural
irrigation and for human consumption (Abdul factors, human activities also affect quality of
Kalam, 2005). The availability of ground water surface and subsurface waters. Activities like
is varied with different hydro geological improper disposal of domestic and municipal
environments (Abbasi, 1998; Sivakumar, 2007). sewage, discharge of untreated industrial wastes,
The surface water in Andhra Pradesh has been agricultural activities, lack of adequate drainage
almost utilized and focus is now on the facilities etc. contribute to water pollution.
extraction of groundwater for multifaceted
demand. Chemical quality of groundwater in
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.1 Showing the characteristics of ground water at Zone A in and around Nellore Industrial Park, Nellore during July 2008 to June 2009

Month
Parameter July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apl. May June
Temp. 26.95 25.48 26.46 24.01 24.5 24.99 26.46 25.97 27.44 28.91 29.89 29.4
Turbidity 50.96 40.18 65.66 77.42 85.26 78.4 65.66 56.84 79.38 61.74 51.94 69.58
pH 8.82 8.722 8.918 9.212 9.408 9.114 8.624 8.428 8.526 8.428 8.036 8.232
BOD 52.92 61.74 76.44 100.94 184.24 92.12 129.36 108.78 67.62 81.34 92.12 69.58
COD 218.54 182.28 296.94 261.66 435.12 575.26 394.94 283.22 299.88 340.06 217.56 309.68
Total alkalinity 1109.36 1610.14 1040.76 1845.34 2359.84 1521.94 1947.26 1614.06 987.84 1187.76 916.3 858.48
Inorg. Nitrate 91.14 123.48 100.94 196.98 160.72 228.34 163.66 125.44 141.12 97.02 163.66 149.94
Inorg. Nitrite 88.2 100.94 92.12 169.54 145.04 164.64 108.78 124.46 97.02 158.76 100.94 81.34
Ammonia 62.72 51.94 69.58 64.68 71.54 65.66 42.14 29.4 37.24 41.16 45.08 22.54
Inorg.Phosphate 50.96 38.22 46.06 92.12 98.98 105.84 51.94 74.48 65.66 62.72 47.04 40.18
Sulphate 1061.928 1124.84 1827.01 3609.242 2596.412 2948.33 1609.85 1116.02 1721.37 2177.85 1979.99 1741.26
Chloride 5.5272 7.0658 6.3602 3.1948 4.3512 4.7726 11.6816 13.3966 16.4836 13.8278 22.5106 27.8614
Fluoride 6.5268 5.9486 5.7722 6.2426 5.1548 5.6742 9.6236 8.1732 6.6248 9.8294 10.4272 8.8004
Total hardness 2594.06 2015.86 1854.16 3254.58 2124.64 2839.06 1806.14 2009.06 1622.88 1222.06 1138.76 1385.72
Calcium 710.5 658.56 683.06 966.28 877.1 1062.32 761.46 804.58 781.06 827.12 884.94 858.48
Magnesium 217.56 203.84 183.26 241.08 311.64 417.48 575.26 944.72 710.5 543.9 495.88 595.84
Cu 5.1548 4.6452 3.7632 6.8404 6.8698 8.7514 8.8984 12.9948 9.9078 8.5162 7.2324 6.2916
Zn 21.4816 16.1406 22.5694 45.9914 37.7006 50.2936 94.6288 56.9086 61.9066 32.8006 46.5206 52.283
Cd 2.1266 1.9012 2.3128 1.617 1.6954 1.4994 0.7546 0.8232 0.9114 0.6076 0.1764 0.4606
Pb 2.1364 2.695 2.8714 3.4006 3.1262 2.9596 1.9992 2.1364 2.5088 1.2348 0.9114 0.4508
Hg 0.7742 0.6272 0.6958 0.4312 0.3822 0.0588 0.1274 0.3038 0.1764 0.2156 0.3626 0.2744
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Hence, in the present investigation, an attempt Results:


has been made to study the nature and extent of
groundwater pollution in the coastal region of The results of the physico-chemical parameters
Nellore district (Zones A, B & C), Nellore and heavy metals of the three Zones A, B & C of
district, Andhra Pradesh during July 2008 to the coastal region of Nellore district, Andhra
June 2009. Pradesh during July 2008 to June 2009 were
shown in Tables 1.1 to 1.7 and were compared
Materials and method: with the drinking water standards.

Selection of Sites for Ground Water study: 1.1 Ground water temperature : At Zone A,
the groundwater temperature was varied from
For the ground water study, three zones were 24.0C to 29.9C. Minimum (24C) of it was
selected in the villages in and around Nellore recorded during October and the maximum
district. Each zone consists of seven villages. (29.9C) during May. At Zone B, it was varied
from 26 to 30.5C. Minimum (26. C) of it was
Zone A: recorded during November and the maximum
(30.5C) during May. At Zone C, it was varied
Zone A lies within the industrial complex. One from 26.5 to 30.5C. Minimum (27C) of it was
of its sides it is having sewage canal. The Pennar recorded during February and the maximum
estuary borders another edge of it. It is also (30.5C) during June (Graph 1.1).
receives one earthened wastewater discharge
canal and two pipelines from the Nellore 1.2. Turbidity: At Zone A, turbidity of the
industries. Solid waste dumps are seen groundwater was varied from 40.2 to 85.3 NTU.
commonly in this zone. It is centralized by the Minimum turbidity (40.2 NTU) was registered
National High way (NH 5) road. This zone is an during August and the maximum (85.3 NTU)
urbanized one. No agricultural lands are during November. At Zone B, it was varied from
available at this zone. 1.84 to 35.28 NTU. Minimum turbidity (7.84
NTU) was registered during May and the
Zone B: maximum (35.28 NTU) during December. At
Zone C, it was varied from 1.96 to 11.76 NTU.
Zone B is within a radius of 0.5 to 1.5 km away Minimum turbidity (1.96 NTU) was registered
from the complex at Sullurpeta. It is a semi during May and the maximum (11.76 NTU)
urbanized zone. during November (Graph 1.2).

Zone C: 1.3. pH (Hydrogen ion Concentration): p H at


Zone A was varied from 8.04 to 9.40. Minimum
Zone C is 1.5 to 3.0 km away from the Kavali (8.2) pH was recorded during May and the
town. It is purely a rural Zone. Intensive maximum (9.40) during November. At Zone B,
agricultural activities were well evidenced in pH was varied from 7.54 to 8.91. Minimum
this Zone. It is not at all influenced by the said (7.54)pH was recorded during July and the
pollution sources for zone A. maximum (8.91) during December. At Zone C,
pH was varied from 7.15 to 8.33. Minimum
Water samples that were collected at monthly (7.15)pH was recorded during April and the
intervals during July 2008 to June 2009 from maximum (8.33) during October (Graph 1.3).
the three Zones A, B and C and analysed by
adopting standard methods for the examination 1.4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) : At
of water as prescribed by Strickland and Parsons Zone A, BOD values were varied from 52.9 to
(1972); Trivedy and Goel (1986); NEERI 184.2 mgl-1 . Minimum (52.9 mgl-1) BOD was
(1988); APHA (1989) and TWAD (1998). recorded during July and the maximum (184.2
mgl-1 ) during November. At Zone B, it was
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.2 Showing the characteristics of ground water at Zone B in and around Nellore Industrial Park, Nellore during July 2008 to June 2009.

Month
Parameter July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apl. May June
Temp. 26.95 27.44 27.93 26.46 25.97 26.95 27.93 28.42 29.4 28.91 30.38 29.89
Turbidity 11.76 17.64 20.58 28.42 31.36 35.28 12.74 14.7 13.72 9.8 7.84 10.78
pH 7.546 7.742 7.938 8.722 8.526 8.918 8.82 8.232 8.428 8.526 8.134 8.232
BOD 12.74 17.64 11.76 45.08 36.26 28.42 19.6 15.68 12.74 4.9 6.86 1.96
COD 56.84 42.14 65.66 99.96 97.02 140.14 26.46 55.86 35.28 5.88 10.78 15.68
Total 515.48 339.08 487.06 1060.36 1143.66 1316.14 435.12 553.7 826.14 883.96 496.86 476.28
alkalinity
Inorg. 26.46 54.88 32.34 95.06 120.54 115.64 25.48 17.64 30.38 10.78 5.88 8.82
Nitrate
Inorg. 23.52 17.64 35.28 85.26 57.82 64.68 17.64 17.15 11.564 3.724 7.448 9.114
Nitrite
Ammonia 1.0878 0.9506 1.4308 2.0874 2.3128 1.9208 1.4406 1.2054 1.4994 1.029 0.8526 0.6174
Inorg. 3.7632 5.8506 10.3488 22.1872 26.1856 18.571 12.3676 14.3472 15.729 8.7318 6.4386 10.1136
Phosphate
Sulphate 555.856 612.108 694.33 1242.934 960.204 1062.516 218.932 458.248 386.414 182.574 145.53 199.724
Chloride 2.6656 3.5378 2.2932 1.8326 1.5876 1.1074 3.6162 4.0376 4.7432 5.8114 6.0858 7.7126
Fluoride 0.8036 0.9506 0.7056 0.5488 0.4606 0.8232 1.2642 1.8032 2.1364 1.9894 1.6072 1.2054
Total 858.48 714.42 610.54 1028.02 1432.76 1779.68 1198.54 808.5 753.62 786.94 634.06 691.88
hardness
Calcium 231.28 301.84 397.88 442.96 459.62 414.54 213.64 190.12 159.74 147.98 100.94 132.3
Magnesium 180.32 165.62 198.94 301.84 280.28 240.1 108.78 91.14 76.44 33.32 54.88 59.78
Cu 0.9506 1.0976 0.8428 0.9114 1.2936 1.3818 2.8322 2.1266 2.4108 3.7828 3.0478 3.4692
Zn 8.7906 10.3488 9.2218 11.3876 7.2716 3.8024 12.789 16.5326 20.5114 27.097 31.5266 37.8868
Cd 0.0882 0.1274 BDL 0.0686 0.1176 0.1764 0.3136 0.2744 0.441 0.2156 0.3528 0.1764
Pb 0.0686 0.0882 0.1078 0.0588 0.1372 0.1274 0.2646 0.1764 0.2254 0.3234 0.3038 0.2842
Hg 0.00784 0.00588 BDL 0.00882 0.0098 0.01176 0.03528 0.02156 0.06664 0.08428 0.04312 0.01666
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

varied from 1.96 to 45.08 mgl-1 . Minimum maximum (85.2 M ) during October. At Zone
(1.96mgl-1 ) BOD was recorded during June and C, minimum (1.17 M) of it was recorded
the maximum (45.08 mgl-1 ) during October. At during August and the maximum (19.81 M
Zone C, it was varied from 0.94 to 5.15 mgl-1. during March (Graph 1.8).
Minimum (0.94 mgl-1) BOD was recorded
during May and the maximum (5.15 mgl-1) 1.9. Ammonia : At Zone A, ammonia was
during December (Graph 1.4). varied from 22.54 to 71.5 M. Minimum (22.54
M ) of it was recorded during June and the
1.5. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) : At maximum (71.5 M) during November. At Zone
Zone A, COD values were varied from 182.2 to B, it was varied from 0.617 to 2.313 M
572.2 mgl-1 . Minimum (182.2 mgl-1) COD was Minimum (0.617 M ) of it was recorded during
recorded during August and the maximum June and the maximum (2.313 M ) during
(572.2 mgl-1) during December. At Zone B, the November. At Zone C, it was varied from 0.617
variation was from 5.88 to 140.1mgl-1. to 2.33 M . Minimum (0.617 M of it was
Minimum (5.88 mgl-1) COD was recorded recorded during August and the maximum (2.33
during April and the maximum (140.1 mgl-1) M) during February (Graph 1.9).
during December. At Zone C, the variation was
from 0.46 to 3.01 mgl-1. Minimum (0.46 mgl-1) 1.10. Inorganic Phosphate : At Zone A,
COD was recorded during May and the minimum (38.22 M) inorganic phosphate
maximum (3.01 mgl-1) during December (Graph concentration was recorded during August and
1. 5). the maximum (105.54 M) during December. At
Zone B, minimum (3.76 M) of it was recorded
1.6. Total Alk ali nit y :Minimum (858.4 mgl-1) during July and the maximum (26.186 M )
and maximum (2359.8 mgl-1) total alkalinity during November. At Zone C, minimum (0.372
values were observed during June and M) of it was recorded during May and the
November months, respectively, at Zone A. maximum (4.17 M ) during November (Graph
Minimum (339.08 mgl-1) and maximum 1.10).
(1316.1mgl-1 ) values of total alk ali nit y were
observed during August and December months, 1.11. Sulphate : Sulphate values at Zone A
respectively, at Zone B. Minimum (130.3 mgl-1) were observed to be minimum (1061.92 mgl-1)
and maximum (810.4 mgl-1) values of total during July and the maximum (3609.24 mgl-1)
alkalinity were observed during August and during October. At Zone B, it was observed to
March months, respectively, at Zone C (Graph be minimum (145.53mgl-1 during May and the
1.6). maximum (1242.93 mgl-1 ) during October. At
Zone C, it was observed to be minimum (28.71
-1
1.7. Inorganic Nitrate : At Zone A, minimum mgl ) during June and the maximum (180.81
(91.1 M) of inorganic nitrate was recorded mgl-1 ) during December (Graph 1.11).
during July and the maximum (228.3 M)
during December. At Zone B, minimum (5.88 1.12. Chloride : Chloride concentration was
M) of it was recorded during May and the minimum (3.195 ) during October and the
maximum (120.54 M) during November. At maximum (27.86 ) during June, at Zone A. It
Zone C, minimum (2.94 M) of it was recorded was minimum (1.10 ) during December and
during July and the maximum (100.94 M) the maximum (7.71 ) during June, at Zone B.
during February (Graph 1.7). It was minimum (1.68) during October and
the maximum (4.98 ) during April, at Zone C
1.8. Inorganic Nitrite : At Zone A, minimum (Graph 1.12).
(81.34 M ) of inorganic nitrite was recorded
during June and the maximum (169.54 M 1.13. Fluoride : At Zone A, minimum (5.15
during October. At Zone B, minimum (3.72 M mgl-1 ) and maximum (10.42 mgl-1 ) fluoride
of it was recorded during April and the concentrations were recorded during November
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.3. Showing the characteristics of ground water at Zone C in and around Nellore Industrial Park, Nellore during July 2008 to June 2009

Month
Parameter
J A S O N D J F M A M J
Groundwater 29.4 28.42 28.91 27.93 27.44 27.44 26.95 26.46 27.44 28.42 29.4 30.38
temp.
Turbidity 5.88 8.82 6.86 9.8 11.76 8.82 4.9 3.92 2.94 3.92 1.96 2.94

pH 7.644 7.84 8.134 8.33 7.938 8.134 7.742 7.448 7.546 7.154 7.448 7.252

BOD 2.1168 2.8812 1.9404 4.5766 3.871 5.1548 3.0968 2.0678 1.9404 1.6366 0.9408 1.4308

COD 1.9894 2.0384 2.3912 2.9008 2.8126 3.0184 2.1756 1.617 1.2054 0.9408 0.4606 0.6664

Total alkalinity 153.86 130.34 146.02 217.56 259.7 281.26 447.86 557.62 810.46 359.66 273.42 260.68

Inorg. Nitrate 2.94 17.64 26.46 32.34 15.68 24.5 95.06 100.94 57.82 45.08 53.9 48.02

Inorg. Nitrite 4.802 1.176 3.724 11.76 8.428 10.192 25.48 18.326 19.8156 12.8674 14.9646 10.6722

Ammonia 0.9604 0.6174 0.7546 0.931 1.0486 1.0878 2.0384 2.3324 1.9306 1.1956 1.3524 1.617

Inorg. Phosphate 2.597 2.1364 2.6656 3.1262 4.1748 3.8906 1.2544 1.6366 1.519 1.0388 0.3724 0.7742

Sulphate 55.566 63.014 69.482 125.734 147.784 180.81 91.336 66.346 48.51 40.082 32.144 28.714
Chloride 2.6166 2.9204 2.0286 1.6856 1.7738 2.0776 3.6162 3.1458 3.8612 4.9784 4.5766 4.1748
Fluoride 0.1176 0.1862 0.2254 0.0882 BDL 0.049 0.3136 0.2646 0.5194 0.6076 0.8526 0.5782
Total hardness 550.76 488.04 524.3 658.56 722.26 788.9 314.58 291.06 281.26 119.56 183.26 198.94
Calcium 87.22 100.94 126.42 183.26 211.68 198.94 142.1 123.48 104.86 50.96 23.52 66.64
Magnesium 69.58 81.34 93.1 120.54 153.86 169.54 103.88 72.52 53.9 28.42 32.34 13.72

Cu 0.37 0.48 0.7 0.66 0.54 0.43 0.87 1.23 1.05 1.08 0.75 0.84

Zn 4.6452 2.2736 5.5762 8.7416 6.4386 4.8804 11.6816 10.1528 12.2402 15.2488 16.9932 13.8866

Cd 0.00784 0.0098 0.00588 0.00392 0.00686 0.00294 BDL 0.0049 BDL 0.00294 0.00098 0.04508

Pb 0.00588 BDL BDL 0.00294 0.0049 0.00098 0.0637 0.03528 0.098 0.06272 0.08134 0.04508

Hg BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

and May months, respectively. At Zone B, it was July and the maximum (1.23 j gl-1) during
minimum (0.46 mgl-1) and maximum (2.136 February (Graph 1.17).
mgl-1 ) during November and March months,
respectively. At Zone C, it was below detectable 1.18. Zinc : Minimum (16.14 gl -1) and
limit (BDL) and maximum (0.853 mgl-1 ) during maximum (94.62 gl-1) concentrations of zinc
November and May months, respectively (Graph were observed during August and January
1.13). months, respectively, at Zone A. Minimum (3.80
(gl -1) and maximum (37.88 gl-1 ) values of Zn
1.14. Total Hardness : Total hardness was were observed during December and June
registered minimum (1138.76 mgl-1) during May months, respectively, at Zone B. Minimum (2.27
and the maximum (3254.6 mgl-1 ) during gl-1 ) and maximum (16.99 gl-1 ) values of zinc
October, at Zone A. It was minimum (610.54 were observed during August and May months,
mgl-1 ) during September and the maximum respectively, at Zone C (Graph 1.18).
(1779.68 mgl-1) during December, at Zone 3. It
was minimum (119.56 mgl-1 ) during April and 1.19. Cadmium : At Zone A, minimum (0.176
the maximum (788.9 mgl-1) during December, at gl-1 ) concentration of cadmium was recorded
Zone C (Graph 1.14). during May and the maximum (2.312 gl-1)
during September . At Zone B, Cd was BDL
1.15. Calcium : At Zone A, calcium during September and it was maximum (0.441
concentration was recorded to be minimum gl-1 ) during March. At Zone C, Cd was BDL
(658.56 mgl-1) during August and the maximum during January and March and it was maximum
-1 -1
(1062.32 mgl ) during December. At Zone B, It (0.0098 gl ) during August (Graph 1.19).
was minimum (100.94 mgl-1) during May and
the maximum (459.62 mgl-1 ) during November. 1.20. Lead : At Zone A, minimum (0.458 gl-1)
At Zone C, it was minimum (23.52 mgl-1 ) during concentration of lead was recorded during June
May and the maximum (211.68 mgl-1) during and the maximum (3.4006 gl-1 ) during October.
November (Graph 1. 15). At Zone B, minimum (0.068 gl-1 ) Pb was
recorded during July and the maximum (0.323
1.16. Magnesium : gl-1 ) during April. At Zone C, it was BDL
during August and September and it was
At Zone A, minimum (188.26 mgl-1) magnesium maximum (0.098 gl-1 ) during March (Graph
concentration was recorded during September 1.20).
and the maximum (944.72 mgl-1 ) during
February. At Zone B, minimum (33.32 mgl-1 ) of 1.21. Mercury : At Zone A, minimum (0.0588
it was recorded during April and the maximum gl-1 ) concentration of mercury was recorded
-1 -
(301.84 mgl ) during October. At Zone C, during December and the maximum (0.774 gl
minimum (13.72 mgl-1 ) of it was recorded 1
) during July. At Zone B, it was BDL during
during June and the maximum (169.54 mgl-1) September and was maximum (0.084 gl-1
during December (Graph 1.16). during April. At Zone C, it was not detected
throughout the study period (Graph 1.21).
1.17. Copper : At Zone A, copper values in the
groundwater were varied from 3.763 to 12.99 Discussion:
gl-1 . Minimum (3.763 gl-1) Cu was recorded
during August and the maximum (12.99 gl-1) Groundwater Pollution in Andhra Pradesh :
during February. At Zone B, the variation was
from 0.8428 to 3.78 gl-1 . Minimum (0.8428 The factors controlling the groundwater
gl-1 ) Cu was recorded during September and pollution include the nature of soil, reactions of
the maximum (3.78 gl-1) during April. At Zone the pollutants in the top soil, saturated and
C, the variation was from 0.37 to 1.23 gl-1. unsaturated zones, and the effects of specific
Minimum (0.37 gl-1 ) Cu was recorded during gravity
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.4 Correlation co-efficient (r) physico-chemical characteristics of ground water at Zone A during July 2008 to June 2009.

Rain Air GW Turbi pH BOD COD Alkali No3 No2 Nh4 PO4 SO 4 Cl Fl Hard Cs Mg Cu Zn Cd Pb Hg
Fall Temp. Temp. dity 5 6 7 nity 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Ness 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
1 2 3 4 8 16
1 1.000

2 -0.837 1.000

3 -0.603 0.839 1.000

4 0.729 -0.582 -0.330 1.000

5 0.744 -0.760 -0.883 0.510 1.000

6 0.527 -0.604 -0.424 0.510 0.442 1.000

7 0.848 -0.726 -0.307 0.686 0.434 0.497 1.000

8 0.579 -0.771 -0.786 0.316 0.680 0.809 0.383 1.000

9 0.737 -0.596 -0.370 0.551 0.317 0.384 0.585 0.379 1.000

10 0.605 -0.584 -0.506 0.459 0.522 0.451 0.535 0.558 0.513 1.000

11 0.625 -0.472 -0.635 0.228 0.838 0.252 0.237 0.401 0.177 0.360 1.000

12 0.817 -0.783 -0.643 0.707 0.673 0.571 0.679 0.591 0.636 0.836 0.439 1.000

13 0.672 -0.460 -0.382 0.700 0.538 0.383 0.488 0.343 0.713 0.778 0.463 0.727 1.000

14 -0.527 0.664 0.863 -0.144 -0.884 -0.247 -0.228 -0.612 -0.096 -0.486 -0.846 - 0.514 -0.313 1.000

15 -0.613 0.536 0.770 -0.334 -0.832 -0.077 -0.192 -0.349 -0.134 -0.170 -0.703 - 0.445 -0.239 0.734 1.000

16 0.559 -0.656 -0.833 0.269 0.782 0.100 0.218 0.485 0.436 0.478 0.628 0.610 0.464 -0.779 -0.681 1.000

17 0.669 -0.417 -0.166 0.599 0.230 0.334 0.618 0.201 0.839 0.702 0.123 0.753 0.806 -0.005 -0.003 0.346 1.000

18 -0.288 0.047 0.359 0.083 -0.589 0.090 0.118 -0.141 0.024 -0.046 -0.816 0.030 -0.273 0.602 0.547 -0.438 0.130 1.000

19 0.030 -0.296 0.007 0.218 -0.261 0.275 0.303 0.166 0.229 0.320 -0.527 0.398 -0.023 0.229 0.343 -0.096 0.332 0.893 1.000

20 0.191 -0.341 0.063 0.374 -0.226 0.365 0.382 0.210 0.467 0.046 -0.465 0.148 0.081 0.334 0.448 -0.122 0.284 0.642 0.646 1.000

21 0.313 -0.356 -0.678 0.000 0.767 -0.068 -0.023 0.268 -0.169 0.032 0.799 0.154 0.048 -0.833 -0.860 0.647 -0.290 -0.757 -0.580 -0.601 1.000

22 0.588 -0.750 -0.928 0.360 0.879 0.293 0.240 0.607 0.271 0.432 0.746 0.593 0.390 -0.892 -0.846 0.762 0.076 -0.448 -0.101 -0.174 0.760 1.000

23 -0.409 0.342 -0.128 -0.507 0.193 -0.319 -0.657 -0.133 -0.581 -0.408 0.439 - 0.411 -0.333 -0.352 -0.384 0.197 -0.609 -0.663 -0.717 -0.760 0.689 0.211 1.000
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

and viscosity, rate of movement of pollutants Gnanasundar and Elango (1998) have observed
and the type of effluent (Dogra et al., 1998). that the most dominating anion in shallow dug
wells as chloride, possibly explained that the
In the present study, turbidity, pH, BOD, COD, polluted Buckingham Canal had high influence
total hardness, Ca++ and Mg++ were high during on the groundwater of aquifer with salt water;
monsoon and low during summer seasons, at all sea water intrusion existing between 200-300m
the three zones, whereas, groundwater from the coast at South Chennai. Tripathy and
temperature, chloride and fluoride were high Panigrahy (1998) have also observed that
during summer and low during monsoon saltwater in the groundwater around salt pans at
seasons, indicating temporal variations. In Chilka Lake, Orissa.
contrast, nutrients, total alkalinity and heavy
metals showed spatio-temporal variations. Moore (1999) has also stated that the increased
groundwater usage in the coastal aquifers caused
From these results, it is very clear that all the infiltration of seawater, which results in an
observed physico-chemical characteristics and increased rate of salinization of subterranean
heavy metals were many-folds higher in the estuaries( Reddy and Mohanthy, 2003).
groundwater at Zone A than at Zones B and C.
In the present study, it has also been inferred In the present study, the changes in physico-
that the rain plays a major role in the variation of chemical characteristics of groundwater
characteristics of groundwater, between zones as observed at Zone A compared to Zones B and C
well as between seasons. could be attributed to the following reasons: It is
well evident from the present study that Pennar
In the present study, the seawater intrusion could estuary is a highly organically polluted water
be confirmed by the excessive levels of body. The higher levels of observed parameters
turbidity, CI- ,SO4 , Mg++, total alk ali nit y and at Zone A possibly could be due to the estuarine
total hardness, which are indicating the brackish water intrusion, since it is in its bank. The
nature of water. Strong positive correlation estuarine water may have intruded into the wells
between them also confirms it. Mala (1997) and of Zone A due to its nearness and making it unfit
Ramanathan (1999) were also made similar for drinking and even for domestic and industrial
observations. purposes. This is well evidenced in the water of
the Pennar estuary, as well as in the groundwater
Higher values of chloride in groundwater at Zone A; exhibiting all the observed
indicate the admixture of mineralized water or parameters at higher concentrations.
pollution (Narayana and Suresh, 1989). Due to
its close proximity to the sea, intrusion of CI - The wells on the banks of the polluted estuary
and SO4 is expected in the ground waters receive direct underground recharge. Similar
(Kumarasamy et al., 1997). Chloride and observations were also made by Rao et al.,
magnesium indicate saltwater dominance in a (1993) in the ground water around Bandi River,
water medium. The type and concentration of near Pali, Rajasthan; recharge up to 500m away
salts depend on the environment, movement and from the river bank. Jacob (1996) and Jacob et
sources of groundwater (Tripathy and al., (1994) have also made similar observations
Panigrahy, 1998). Once the seawater has around hosiery industrial polluted river Noyyal,
intruded in summer, it is difficult to push back Tiruppur. In the present study, it can be
the high density salt water wedge. So, in the presumed that the polluted estuarine water was
monsoon period, the input of fresh rainwater intruded into the groundwater aquifer and make
dilutes sea water. The steady increase of these it maximum contaminated.
parameters concentrated towards sea levels can
be ascribed to groundwater movement and The other possible reason for the groundwater
dissolution of salts (Rao and Rao, 1995). contamination at Zone A is wastewater
discharging canals or effluent receiving canals.
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.5 Correlation co-efficient (r) for physico-chemical characteristics of ground water at Zone B during July 2008 to June 2009.

Rain Air GW Turbi Alkali Hard


Fall Temp. Temp. dity pH BOD COD nity No3 No2 Nh4 PO4 SO 4 Cl Fl Ness Cs Mg Cu Zn Cd Pb Hg
5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
1 2 3 4 8 16
1 1.000

2 -0.837 1.000

3 -0.632 0.722 1.000

4 0.907 -0.823 -0.770 1.000

5 0.658 -0.630 -0.129 0.454 1.000

6 0.688 -0.786 -0.816 0.837 0.476 1.000

7 0.860 -0.809 -0.782 0.949 0.337 0.796 1.000

8 0.859 -0.621 -0.467 0.761 0.679 0.642 0.709 1.000

9 0.912 -0.788 -0.806 0.964 0.440 0.881 0.894 0.773 1.000

10 0.763 -0.719 -0.780 0.911 0.427 0.917 0.901 0.704 0.886 1.000

11 0.805 -0.853 -0.748 0.861 0.578 0.893 0.808 0.780 0.867 0.853 1.000

12 0.728 -0.767 -0.512 0.778 0.704 0.797 0.673 0.783 0.775 0.744 0.889 1.000

13 0.746 -0.695 -0.833 0.927 0.249 0.881 0.933 0.660 0.902 0.958 0.813 0.672 1.000

14 -0.677 0.793 0.902 -0.814 -0.171 -0.789 -0.869 -0.494 -0.790 -0.798 - 0.811 -0.512 -0.854 1.000

15 -0.589 0.429 0.772 -0.678 0.062 -0.628 -0.667 -0.222 -0.679 -0.743 - 0.502 -0.321 -0.740 0.685 1.000

16 0.959 -0.859 -0.630 0.773 0.670 0.663 0.757 0.745 0.800 0.651 0.732 0.659 0.586 -0.638 -0.429 1.000

17 0.739 -0.724 -0.870 0.923 0.232 0.827 0.871 0.557 0.884 0.899 0.821 0.643 0.933 -0.886 -0.827 0.588 1.000

18 0.711 -0.677 -0.900 0.881 0.160 0.877 0.879 0.535 0.882 0.933 0.806 0.612 0.956 -0.889 -0.876 0.581 0.959 1.000

19 -0.400 0.476 0.789 -0.653 0.262 -0.628 -0.740 -0.190 -0.625 -0.680 - 0.547 -0.267 -0.813 0.860 0.746 -0.267 -0.805 -0.856 1.000

20 -0.585 0.763 0.884 -0.709 -0.064 -0.680 -0.774 -0.343 -0.693 -0.647 - 0.695 -0.372 -0.744 0.968 0.615 -0.582 -0.801 -0.793 0.849 1.000

21 -0.349 0.187 0.716 -0.486 0.184 -0.474 -0.491 -0.229 -0.518 -0.576 - 0.250 -0.143 -0.624 0.468 0.821 -0.280 -0.650 -0.687 0.588 0.421 1.000

22 -0.351 0.446 0.805 -0.626 0.273 -0.629 -0.728 -0.189 -0.606 -0.680 - 0.492 -0.243 -0.820 0.813 0.733 -0.248 -0.770 -0.840 0.977 0.810 0.670 1.000

23 -0.359 0.370 0.608 -0.520 0.223 -0.512 -0.595 0.003 -0.519 -0.556 - 0.256 -0.201 -0.606 0.525 0.842 -0.343 -0.609 -0.694 0.736 0.510 0.680 0.750 1.000
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

In the present study area, effluents from various It is also evident from the present study that at
industries at Nellore industrial park are let out Zone B also exhibited elevated concentrations of
through three canals; one being earthened canal observed characteristics of groundwater,
and others being cement pipelines. These canals particularly during rainy season; it is also
run through the villages before they empty into observed that Zone B is getting polluted recently
the Pennar estuary. The eartherned canal and due to Nellore industrial park effluents. At Zone
leakages in the cement pipes on their way may C, it seems that industry has no impact, all the
pollute the nearby groundwater by direct parameters being in lesser concentrations. Slight
seepage into the aquifer. higher concentrations of nutrients and total
alkalinity and their variations at Zone C
Another possible source for the groundwater probably could be due to intensive agricultural
contamination in this zone is the solid waste practices in the surroundings. Govardhan (1990)
dumping. The dumping of residual sludge from from his observations in Nalgonda District, A.P
effluent treatment plants from different has stated that the greater quantity of various
industries into low-lying areas over the years has pollutants due to increased human activities in
also polluted the groundwater. Since this area is terms of cultivation practices, dumping of
an urban area, municipal solid waste disposal fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides and also due
sites are also responsible for groundwater to water logging excessive irrigation and
pollution. These refused dumps have caused intensive farm practices. Guin and Rajkumar
leaching into some parts of the aquifer, (1993) in Calcutta and Das and Mehta (1996) in
particularly during the rainy season. coastal alluvial areas of Orissa had also made
similar observations.
The other possible reasons for the groundwater
contamination of the area might be sewage and The presence of heavy metal ions in
stagnant ponds. These also seep into the groundwater indicate that soil zone has become
groundwater in course of time. Since at Zone A, saturated in respect of these ions. The positive
sewage canal is passing, through the seepage correlation between metals indicates the
and it may be one of the reasons for the possible association of these metals in ground
groundwater pollution. Since the soil is sandy waters (Jacob et al., 1994). In the present study,
with low water holding capacity and high higher concentration of heavy metals was
permeability, the seepage rate is very high due to observed only at Zone A, not at Zones B and C.
large hydraulic conductivity. After infiltration This explanation is in agreement with
through the unsaturated zone, pollutants reach Govardhan (1990) that the greater amount of
the water table and migrate through adhesion heavy metals might be the result of disturbed
and hydraulic dispersion (Thangarajan, 1999). localized ecosystem by means of various
Similar observations were also made by anthropogenic factors like dumping of various
Narayana and Suresh (1989) in Mangalore city; industrial discharged water, impact of intensive
Kumarasamy et al., (1997) in coastal basin in agricultural practices, water logging excessive
Visakhapatnam; Gill and Arora (1997) in irrigation and irrational application of pesticides,
Ludhiana city, Punjab; Dhembare et al., (1998) fungicides and herbicides, which aided in the
in Pravara area, Maharashtra; Sharma and Dogra enrichment of the groundwater.
(1998) in Faridabad, Haryana and Gonsalves and
D'Souza (1999) in Calangute, Goa. Another possible explanation for this is metal
rich polluted estuarine water , intrusion and
Since the Zones B and C are free from the atmospheric wash-outs and road run off due to
pollution sources that are evident at Zone A and vehicular pollution, as National Highway is
are quite away from the industrial zone, the passing through the middle of the zone. Heavy
extent of groundwater pollution decreases in the metals in the groundwater were also reported
order of Zone A > Zone B > Zone C. around Cooum river (Jacob et al., 1994 and
Sukumar and Sadagopan, 1990); Visakhapatnam
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.6 Correlation co-efficient (r) for physico-chemical characteristics of ground water at Zone C during July 2008 to June 2009.

Rain Air GW Turbi Hard


Fall Temp. Temp. dity pH BOD COD Alk No3 No2 Nh4 PO4 SO4 Cl Fl Ness Cs Mg Cu Zn Cd Pb Hg
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
1 2 3 4 16
1 1

2 -0.686 1

3 -0.209 0.766 1

4 0.7426 -0.670 -0.278 1

5 0.6088 -0.677 -0.279 0.799 1

6 0.8051 -0.878 -0.505 0.820 0.782 1

7 0.6920 -0.852 -0.473 0.888 0.897 0.886 1

8 -0. 319 -0.116 -0.552 -0.490 -0.377 -0.181 -0.311 1

9 -0.506 -0.038 -0.468 -0.586 -0.410 -0.276 -0.366 0.677 1

10 -0.315 -0.169 -0.510 -0.510 -0.325 -0.095 -0.275 0.785 0.867 1

11 -0.427 -0.052 -0.430 -0.620 -0.511 -0.285 -0.402 0.817 0.904 0.874 1

12 0.833 -0.752 -0.330 0.909 0.793 0.817 0.910 -0.330 -0.585 -0.452 -0.502 1

13 0.896 -0.920 -0.531 0.801 0.758 0.9504 0.877 -0.162 -0.256 -0.074 -0.241 0.862 1

14 -0.640 0.692 0.280 -0.857 -0.89 -0.741 -0.920 0.3908 0.473 0.447 0.456 -0.913 -0.754 1

15 -0.603 0.760 0.413 -0.865 -0.753 -0.787 -0.936 0.3196 0.410 0.387 0.366 -0.901 -0.761 0.9153 1

16 0.818 -0.723 -0.245 0.898 0.874 0.842 0.923 -0.428 -0.606 -0.475 -0.551 0.965 0.858 -0.940 -0.892 1

17 0.741 -0.948 -0.612 0.817 0.783 0.900 0.9165 -0.046 -0.167 -0.038 -0.132 0.870 0.928 -0.839 -0.850 0.839 1

18 0.817 -0.927 -0.565 0.843 0.834 0.913 0.942 -0.193 -0.276 -0.134 -0.284 0.894 0.966 -0.837 -0.838 0.900 0.941 1

19 -0.591 0.215 -0.307 -0.655 -0.598 -0.491 -0.557 0.7410 0.820 0.685 0.771 -0.626 -0.471 0.603 0.554 -0.752 -0.343 -0.521 1

20 -0.466 0.486 0.163 -0.763 -0.686 -0.567 -0.777 0.4598 0.590 0.660 0.568 -0.776 -0.524 0.816 0.874 -0.814 -0.583 -0.655 0.695 1

21 -0.094 0.374 0.629 -0.160 -0.323 -0.251 -0.325 -0.263 -0.110 -0.265 0.009 -0.218 -0.299 0.160 0.159 -0.196 -0.233 -0.388 -0.034 0.103 1

22 -0.573 0.4195 -0.022 -0.817 -0.686 -0.587 -0.764 0.731 0.624 0.747 0.671 -0.782 -0.565 0.838 0.838 -0.813 -0.577 -0.625 0.692 0.855 -0.090 1

23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Table 1.7. Showing the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the physico-chemical characteristics of the ground
water at different Zones in Nellore (Dt) during July 2008 to June 2009.

Parameter. Groups SS DF MS F-VALUE P-VALUE


Temp. BM 57.19716 11 5.199741414 6.112615823 0.000161134
BZ 16.50021 2 8.250102778 9.698503207 0.000954973
Turbidity BM 1846.529 11 167.8662788 3.06116492 0.012270065
BZ 23557.81 2 11778.90583 214.7970015 3.66792E-15
pH BM 3.261892 11 0.296535626 3.145613584 0.01065386
BZ 5.942208 2 2.971104111 31.51710831 3.47631E-07
BOD BM 7514.236 11 683.1123797 1.771922288 0.122082353
BZ 56331.94 2 28165.968 73.05958425 1.9269E-10
COD BM 68303.22 11 6209.383851 1.706137015 0.137825887
BZ 688607.5 2 344303.7486 94.60348792 1.56624E-11
Total BM 1793426 11 163038.6875 1.587227092 0.171495442
alkalinity
BZ 7354833 2 3677416.525 35.80067545 1.20933E-07
Inorg. NO3 BM 20040.56 11 1821.869099 1.43695137 0.225444538
BZ 81402.28 2 40701.13841 32.10195322 2.99125E-07
Inorg. NO2 BM 10252.82 11 932.0748149 2.256399198 0.050192463
BZ 79859.86 2 39929.93247 96.66377222 1.26635E-11
NH3 BM 987.6366 11 89.7851418 0.989393151 0.484660457
BZ 19177.29 2 9588.646477 105.6627072 5.23681E-12
Inorg. Po4 BM 3387.886 11 307.9896077 2.135335457 0.062566205
BZ 26712.24 2 13356.11929 92.59986178 1.93361E-11
SO4 BM 4372861 11 397532.8452 2.323164012 0.044482856
BZ 22903218 2 11451609.12 66.92268701 4.43625E-10
Cl BM 421.0304 11 38.27548669 2.734873374 0.021437113
BZ 512.1546 2 256.0773131 18.29732515 2.09032E-05
Fl BM 23.01445 11 2.092222669 2.370659827 0.040835898
BZ 357.9047 2 178.9523644 202.7677014 6.69818E-15
Total hardness BM 4443646 11 403967.7819 4.222824939 0.001971921
BZ 15203937 2 7601968.274 79.46619174 8.58954E-11
Ca BM 224660 11 20423.63358 2.92385588 0.015481024
BZ 3313744 2 1656871.756 237.1984499 1.29578E-15
Mg BM 133852.5 11 12168.41109 0.449822008 0.914524391
BZ 937321.6 2 468660.8207 17.32469012 3.03042E-05
Cu BM 41.25953 11 3.750866469 1.931693048 0.09092343
BZ 307.9919 2 153.9959486 79.30778279 8.75674E-11
Zn BM 3162.745 11 287.5223072 1.863180128 0.10316476
BZ 8500.08 2 4250.039811 27.54078387 1.02375E-06
Cd BM 1.348296 11 0.122572386 0.629588779 0.784849453
BZ 10.58643 2 5.293214694 27.18841231 1.13259E-06
Pb BM 2.504716 11 0.227701418 0.717854188 0.710139738
BZ 35.26236 2 17.63118223 55.58427402 2.50168E-09
Hg BM 0.168713 11 0.015337578 0.824702974 0.618146196
BZ 1.01878 2 0.509389864 27.38993912 1.06888E-06
BM = Between months BZ = Between Zones

Standards (1982), World Health Organisation


(Rao and Rao, 1989); Hubly (Hegde and (1984), Indian Council of Medical Research
Puranik, 1992); around Noyyal river, Tiruppur (1989) and CHEECO, the present study clearly
(Jacob, 1996); around a phosphatic fertilizer indicates that all the parameters at Zone A and
plant at Paradip (Pradhan et al., 1998) and some parameters at Zone B, particularly in rainy
around oil installations at Rudrasagar, Assam season, were above the permissible limits.
(Sharma et al., 1995). Whereas, at Zone C, the characteristics were
within the prescribed limits. In the present
When compared with the drinking water study, it has been observed that the values are in
standards prescribed by Buaero of Indian
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

graph 1.2 Turbidity Graph 1.3 98 pH


10
90 9
Graph 1.1 Ground water temp. 80 8
35 70 7

Turbidity(NTU)
30 60
Ground water tempC)

6
50

pH
25 5
40 4
20
30 3
15
20 2
10 10 1
5 0 0
0 J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
J A S O N D J F M A M J

Graph 1.4 BOD Graph 1.5 COD


200
180 700
160 600
140
BOD(mgl-1 )

120 C OD (m gl- 1) 500


Zone A
100 400
80
Zone B
300 Zone C
60
40 200
20 100
0
0
J A S O N D J F M A M J
J A S O N D J F MA M J

Graph 1.8 Inorg.Nitrite


1.7 Inorganic Nitrate 180
Graph 1.6 Total alkalinity 250
160
2500
In org .N itrite(M) 140
In org an ic Ni tra te (M)

200
120
Total alk al ini ty(mgl -1)

2000
100
150
1500 80
100 60
1000 40
50 20
500 0
0 J A S O N D J F M A M J
0 J A S O N D J F M A M J
J A S O N D J F M A M J

Graph 1.10 Inorg.Phosphate


Graph 1.9 Ammonia 120
80
70 100
Inorg.Phosphate(M)

60
Ammonia(M)

80
50 Zone A
40 60 Zone B
30
Zone C
20 40
10
20
0
J A S O N D J F M A M J
0
J A S O N D J F M A M J

Graphs 1.1-1.10 . Showing the physico-chemical characteristics of the ground water at zones A,B
&C during July 2008 to June 2009.
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

conformity with the works of Mala (1997) and Arora, V., Jha, V., Bandopadhya, P., and Kumar, S.
Ramanathan et. al., (1999). (2006). Analytical evaluation of potential
pollution from trace elements in various of
mashed coal in Kedla and Rajrappa washeries. J.
Instn. Engrs., 86 (March): pp. 21 25.
Since there is no prospect of any augmentation
Das, S. and Mehta, B.C. (1996). Groundwater
of water supply from surface source, heavy management in coastal alluvial areas of Orissa.
reliance is bound to be placed on groundwater in J. IPHE, 3: pp. 11-24.
this area. Hence, people have to depend only on Dhembare, A.J. Pondhe, G.M. and Singh, C.R.
groundwater for their drinking as well as (1998). Groundwater characteristics and their
domestic purposes. The higher levels of significance with special reference to public
physico-chemical characteristics may also leads health in Pravara area, Maharashtra. Poll Res.,
to the health hazards of the consumers. Water 17(1): pp. 87-90
related public disorders and the associated Dogra, R., Madhuri Sharma and Harish Arora.
water-borne diseases due to unhygienic (1998). Industrialization and deteriorating water
quality in Paniput city. Haryana, India. Environ.
condition of water were observed by Jacob
Poll. Control J., Jan-Feb: pp. 41-44.
(1996) around Noyyal river, is also true in the Gill, G.S. and Harish Arora (1997). A victim of
case of present study where, the surrounding rapid industrialization Ludhiana city, Punjab,
people of Nellore industrial park area are India: Case study. Environ. Poll. Control J.,
suffering from many health disorders. Nov.Dec. :26-28.
Gnanasundar, D. and Elango, L. (1998).
If the effluents continue to be discharge at the Groundwater quality of a coastal urban aquifer.
present level, the groundwater pollution will Indian J. Environ. Protec., 18(10): pp. 752-757.
continue to increase both in volume and Gonsalves, D.V. and Joe D Souza. (1999). Impact
of the tourism industry on groundwater in
concentration. Therefore, from the above
Calangute, Goa. Ecol. Env. & Cons., 5(1): pp.
mentioned facts, it appears reasonable to assume
19-24.
that the groundwater in the coastal region of Govardhan (1990). Groundwater pollution hazardous
Nellore district, Andhra Pradesh is no more on to human life-A case study of Nalgonda District.
the safer side and if proper remedial or Indian J. Environ. Protec. 10(1): pp. 54-61.
alternative measures are not taken immediately, Guin, D. and Rajkumar. (1993). uncontrolled
the whole system of this area may get crippled abstraction of groundwater in urban areas and its
in the near future. So, a consorted action on the environmental impact; Indian scenario. J. IPHE,
part of enforcing agencies as well as the 3: pp. 33-39.
industrialists is the need of the hour to protect Hegde, S.N and Puranik, S.C. (1992). Trace
this area from further deterioration. elements in ground waters of Hubli city,
Karnataka , India. Curr. Sci., 63(1): pp. 43-44.
Jacob, C.T., (1996). Impact of industries on the
Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful groundwater quality of Tiruppur and its ethical
to UGC for the financial assistance in the form implications. Ph.D. Thesis. University of
of Major research project grant Madras, India, p. 24.
Jacob,C.T., Jayapaul Azaraiah, Paul Appasamy and
References: Gunnar Jacks (1999). Ethical implication of
industrial pollution on the groundwater quality at
Abbasi, S.A. (1996). Water very special, very Tiruppur, Tamilnadu, India. In: Bioethics in
precious. J. IPHE. 2: pp. 1-11 India (eds. Azaraih, J., Azaraih, H. & Macer, and
Abdul Kalam, A.P.J. (2005). Integrated water D.R.J.). Eubios Ethics Institute, Christchurch,
mission. Yojana. (June): pp. 2 5. New Zealand, pp. 288 -293.
APHA, AWWA WPCF (1989). Standard Methods Kumaraswamy, N., Kiran Kumar, K. and Venkata
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Rao, M.V. (1997). Groundwater quality of a
(Lenorre S. Clesceri, Arnold E. and Green Berg, coastal basin in Visakhapatnam - A case study.
th
eds.). 17 edn. American Public Health Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 39 (2) : pp. 109-144.
Association, Washington, D.C. 2000 J. Kumaraswamy, N., Kiran Kumar, K. and Venkata
Rao, M.V. (1997). Groundwater quality of a
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

Graph 1.12 Chloride Graph 1.13 Fluoride


Graph 1.11 Sulphate 12
30
4000
10
3500 25

Fl uori de(mgl-1)
8

Chloride(mgl-1)
3000 20
Sulphate(M)

2500 6
15
2000
4
1500 10

1000
2
5
500 0
0
0
J A S O N D J F M A M J
J A S O N D J F M A M J
J A S O N D J F M A M J

Graph 1.15 Calcium


Graph 1.14 Total Hardnes s
1200
3500
3000 1000
Total Hardne ss(mg l-1)

Zone A
Calcium(mgl-1)

2500 800
Zone B
2000
600 Zone C
1500
400
1000
500 200

0 0
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J

Graph 1.17 Copper


Graph 1.18 Zinc
Graph 1.16 Magnes ium 14 100
1000
900 90
12
800 80
Magnesium(g/g)

10 70
C op pe r( g/g)

700
60
zinc(g/g)

600 8
50
500 6 40
400
30
300 4
20
200
2 10
100 0
0 0
J A S O N D J F M A M J
J A S O N D J F M A M J J AS O N D J F M A M J

Graph 1.19 Cadmium Graph 1.20 Lead


2.5 4
3.5
2
3
Cadmium(g/g)

2.5
Lead (g/g)

1.5
2
1 1.5
0.5 1
0.5
0 0
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J

Graphs 1.11 - 1.21 . Showing the physico-chemical characterstics of the ground water at zones A,B
&C during july 2008 to june 2009
J.Aqua.biol.(2010).25(1)231-248

transport modeling In: Proc. Intl. Sem. Appl.


coastal basin in Visakhapatnam - A case study. Hydrogeochem., Annamalai University, India,
Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 39 (2) : pp. 109-144. pp. 168-183.
coastal basin in Visakhapatnam - A case study. Reddy, G.P. and Mohanty, D.R. (2003). Impact of
Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 39 (2) : pp. 109-144. Aquaculture on Environment. Yojana. (June): pp.
Mala, V. (1997). Study on the environmental hydro 23 25.
geochemistry and sediment logical aspects Sharma, M. and Rajeev Dogra. (1998). Impact of
between Puduchathiram to Chidambaram area, industrialization on groundwater quality,
Cuddalore District, east coast of India, M. Phil., Faridabad, Haryana-Case study. Environ. Poll.
Thesis, and Annamalai University, India. pp. 94. Control. J., mar-April: pp. 44-49.
Moore, W. S. (1999). The subterranean estuary: A Sivakumar, S. (2007). Quality of ground water in the
reaction zone of groundwater and seawater. Mar. outskirts of Kanchipuram. Eco. News, 13(2): pp.
Chem., 65: pp. 111-125. 19 20.
Narayana, A. C. and Suresh, G. C. (1989). Chemical Strickland, J.D.H. and Parsons, T.R. (1972). A
quality of groundwater of Mangalore city, Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Bull.
Karnataka. Indian J. Environ Hlth., 31 (3): pp. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 167: pp. 310.
228-236. Sukumaran, G.B. and Sadagopan, V. (1990). Impact
NEERI (1988). Water and Wastewater Analysis, of river Cooum on the adjoining groundwater in
Course Manual. National Environmental the city of Madras, Tamilnadu. Bull. Envi. Sci.,
Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, India. VIII: pp. 13-20.
Pradhan, S.K., Patnaik, K and Rout, S. P. (1998). Thangarajan, M. (1999). Quantification of pollutant
Groundwater quality An assessment around a migration in the groundwater regime through
phosphatic fertilizer plant at Paradip. Indian J. mathematical modeling. Curr. Sci., 76(1): pp.
Environ. Protec., 18 (10): pp. 769-772. 73-81.
Ramanathan, A.L., Chidambaram, S., Anandhan, P., Tripathy, J.K. and Panigrahy, R.C. (1998).
Manivannan, R., Mala, V. and Ganesh, N. Groundwater quality studies around the salt
(1999). Abnormalities of certain dissolved pans, south west of Chilka Lake, Orissa. poll.
major ions in ground waters of the coastal tract Res., 17(2): pp. 157-161.
from Puduchatiram to Chidambaram, east coast Trivedhy, R.K. and Goel, P.K. (1986). Chemical and
of India. In: Proc. Intl. Sem. Appl. Biological methods for water pollution studies.
Hydrogeochem., Annamalai University, India. Environmental publications, India, pp. 167-171.
pp. 57-75. TWAD. (1998). Water and Wastewater Analysis
Rao, C.S. and Rao, N.V.S. (1995). Groundwater in a Lab Manual. Research Developing and Training
residential colony. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., Centre. Tamilnadu Water supply and Drainage ,
37(4): pp. 295-300 Chennai, India.
Rao, V.V.S.G., Dhar, R.S., Jayachand, T. and WHO (1992). Revision of WHO guidelines for
Khoker, C.S. (1999). Groundwater drinking water quality. Report. Find Task Group
contamination around Mathura Oil Refinery, Meeting, Genera, Switzerland. pp. 21-25.
Mathura, U.P: An assessment through mass

You might also like