Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction.
Two different words have been used that imply beliefs about
causation of differences between females and males, i.e. sex and
gender. Gender difference in learning mathematics continued to
attract researcher in recent days. Women education was started very
late in many countries. Differences in the educational opportunities
available for male and female are clearly illustrated by literacy rates of
different societies. Gender equity in mathematics education is always a
complex issue. Although boys and girls take the same course and
textbooks in mathematics in the school, there is difference in
achievement pattern. The literacy rates clearly show the effect of
gender difference in education. Literacy rate for women is 15% where
as male literacy is 40% in Nepal. This kind of difference shows unequal
access to educational opportunities. Lack of equity in education has
been a serious problem in developing countries like Nepal. Variables
such as social systems, culture customs, economic condition and
traditions effect gender equity. In most cases, the trend of sending
girls to schools has been affected by the notion of making them literate
in the first place whereas boys have special focus in educational
activities in part of the family. They are supposed to carry on the social
tradition and expected to generate livelihood. This situation is
attributed to the fact that boys are invaluable and indispensable assets
in the family and society. However, at the present times, number of
*
Lecturer. Mahendra Ratan Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal
school going girls have analyed context of student achievement
statistically.
The pattern of achievement is one of the significant aspects in
educational researches. Student achievement as such is determined by
various factors. International studies, time and again have analysed
contexts of student achievement statistically.
2. Some International Gender related Studies
Differences between females and males in mathematics have
long been observed and discussed among educators and researchers.
A number of researchers investigated the grade or age trend of gender
differences and similarities in mathematics. A consistent conclusion
over the past two to three decades has been the generally similar
achievement between females and males in mathematics in the early
grades (Zhang, Wilson & Manon, 1999; Wilson and Zhang, 1998;
Willingham and Cole, 1997; Cleary, 1992; Hyde, Fennema & Lamon,
1990).
Begley’s findings that a gender gap exists in math achievement
(Begley, 1988; Fan & Chen, 1997; Holden, 1998; Leahey & Guo,
2001; Manning, 1998; Sadker & Sadker, 1994; Shields, 1991; Yun
Dai, 2001). Findings from the Condition of Education 1997 (1998)
indicate that elementary age students have a very small, if any,
gender gap. Instead, the gap increases around the age of thirteen and
continues to expand through the high school and college ages.
Willingham and Cole (1997), in a summary of recent literature on
gender and performance, indicate a general agreement that there is
little overall gender difference in mathematics test scores in
elementary school, some differences appear in middle school, and
average differences favoring males are more common in high school,
particularly on problem-solving.
Data from Project TALENT in the 1960s and NAEP in the 1980s
support the grade trend that the greater gain by males on problem
solving and reasoning occurred in high school, particularly in grades 11
and 12. With regard to gender gaps in mathematics achievement, two
recent meta-analyses of previous studies on this topic have produced
congruent conclusions (Friedman 1989; Hyde, Fennema & Lamon,
1990).
Gender gaps favouring males in mathematics achievement are
relatively small or negligible in early school years, but increase at
higher grades. In general, gender gaps tend to be larger among the
more able students than among students of average ability. Males also
tend to have an advantage over females on test items that measure
problem-solving skills.
Two quantitative syntheses (Steinkamp & Maehr, 1983, 1984)
found gender gaps favouring males in mathematics were larger in
school level. The differences were also larger among junior high school
students than among those in elementary or high school. Benbow and
Stanley (1980, 1983) believe that females do not perform as well as
males in mathematics because females have inferior innate ability in
spatial visualization. This view is challenged by the socialization
theory, according to which gender differences in academic outcomes
are due to influences of the environment--home, school and
community.
A comprehensive review of research on gender differences in
spatial ability (Linn & Petersen, 1986) found that no conclusive
evidence existed to support either argument. On the other hand,
overwhelming evidence indicates that gender differences in
mathematics and science achievement are decreasing over time
(Frazier-Kouassi et al. 1992; Oakes, 1990; Fennema 1985), which is
consistent with the socialization theory.
Astin (1974) finds that boys are more likely than girls to have
informal, mathematically related experiences such as playing with
scientific toys, participating in mathematical games, and reading
mathematics books. Boys also have more problem-solving experiences
outside the mathematics classroom (Kimball 1989).
In a meta-analysis of gender differences in attitudes about
mathematics, Hyde et al. (1990b) report that the magnitude of these
differences diminished over the previous two decades. However, males
still report more encouragement from their parents and teachers than
do their female peers. In addition, males stereotype mathematics as a
“masculine” domain much more than females, though neither gender
holds strongly stereotypical views.
4. Conclusion
5. References