Cse Sar

Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Part A: Institutional Information
1. Name and Address of the Institution:
ACS College of Engineering
207, Kambipura, Mysore Road,
Bangalore-560074,
Karnataka, India.
2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:
Visvesvaraya Technological University,
Jnana Sangama,
Belagavi 590108,
Karnataka, India.
3. Year of Establishment of the Institution:
2009-10
4. Type of Institution:
Institute of national Importance
University
Deemed university
Affiliated
Autonomous
Any other (Please specify)
Note:
1. In case of Autonomous and Deemed University, mention the year of grant of status by the
authority.
1|Page
CSE Self Assessment Report

2. In case of University Constituent Institution please indicate the academic autonomy status of the
Institution as defined in 12th Plan guidelines of UGC. Institute should apply for Tier 1 only when fully
academically autonomous.
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government
State Government
Government Aided
Self financing
Trust
Society
Section 25 Company
Any Other (Please specify)
6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:
Year of
Name of the Institution(s) Programs of Study Location
Establishment
RajaRajeswari Medical College & Hospital 2004-05 MBBS, MD, MS Bangalore
RajaRajeswari Dental College & Hospital 1991-92 BDS, MDS Bangalore
RajaRajeswari College of Engineering 2006-07 BE, M.Tech, Ph.D Bangalore
GNM, BSC,
RajaRajeswari College & School of Nursing 2004-05 Bangalore
PCBSC, MSC
Note: Add rows as needed.
2|Page

7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:
Increase
Year of Year of Accreditation
S. No. Program Name Intake in intake AICTE Approval
Start increase Status*
if any
1. B.E- Computer Applied

Science & 2009-10 60 No No
Engineering
2. B.E-Civil 2009-10 F.No.06/06/KTK Applied

60 No No
Engineering /
ENGG/2008/003
B.E-Electronics & Applied
3. 2009-10 dt.22/06/2009
Communication 60 No No
Engineering
4. B.E-Mechanical 2009-10 Applied

60 No No
Engineering
5. B.E-Aeronautical 2010-11 60 No No F.No.South- Not Eligible

Engineering West Region/1-
328729
Not Eligible
6. B.E-Bio-Medical 2010-11 60 No No /2010/EOA
Engineering
dt.23/08/2010
F.No.South- Not Eligible

B.E-Electrical & West Region/1-
7. Electronics 2011-12 60 No No 402580963
Engineering /2011/EOA
dt.01/09/2011
M.Tech / PG Courses
M.Tech Product
1. Design & 2013-14 18 No No F.No.South-West
Manufacturing Region/1-1359990619
M.Tech /2013/EOA
2. Structural 2013-14 18 No No dt.19/03/2013
Engineering
3|Page

M.Tech
3. Software 2014-15 18 No No F.No.South-West
Engineering Region/
M.Tech Digital 1-2017625631

Electronics & /2014/EOA
4. 2014-15 18 No No
Communication dt.04/06/2014
Engineering
* Write applicable one:
Applying first time
Granted provisional accreditation for two years for the period(specify period)
Granted accreditation for 5 years for the period (specify period)
Not accredited (specify visit dates, year)
Withdrawn (specify visit dates, year)
Not eligible for accreditation
Eligible but not applied
Note: Add rows as needed.
8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application
S. No. Program Name
1. B.E- Computer Science & Engineering
2. B.E- Civil Engineering
3. B.E- Electronics & Communication Engineering
4. B.E- Mechanical Engineering
4|Page

9. Total number of employees:
A. Regular* Employees (Faculty and Staff):
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Items
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M 69 69 65 65 52 52
Faculty in Engineering
F 33 33 37 37 28 28
Faculty in Maths, Science & M 9 9 9 9 13 13

Humanities teaching in
engineering Programs F 8 8 8 8 9 9
M 40 40 40 40 24 24
Non-teaching staff
F 13 13 13 13 16 16
* Means
Full time on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period of
not less than two years AND drawing consolidated salary not less than applicable
gross salary shall only be counted as a regular employee.
Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the Regulatory Authority/
Central Government and implementation as prescribed by the Central/State
Government as the case may be. In case State Government prescribes lesser
consolidated salary for a particular cadre then same will be considered as
reference while counting faculty as a regular faculty.
CAY: Current Assessment Year (July June: completed)
CAYm1: Current Assessment Year minus 1

CAYm2: Current Assessment Year minus 2
5|Page

B. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff): (Not covered in Table A):
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Items
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M
Faculty in Engineering
F
Faculty in Maths, Science & M

Humanities teaching in F Not
engineering Programs Applicable
M
Non-teaching staff
F
10. Total number of Engineering Students:
Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
Total no. of boys 211 170 178
Total no. of girls 87 110 87
Total no. of students 298 280 265
(Instruction: The data may be categorized in tabular form separately for undergraduate,
postgraduate engineering, other program, if applicable)
Note:
In case the institution is running programs other than engineering programs, a separate table
giving similar details is to be included
11. Vision of the Institution:
Engineering the future of the nation by transforming the students to be technically skilled managers,
innovative leaders and environmentally receptive citizens.
6|Page

12. Mission of the Institution:
To implement holistic approach in curriculum and pedagogy through Industry Integrated Interactions
to meet the needs of Global Engineering Environment.
To develop students with knowledge, attitude and skill of employability, entrepreneurship (Be Job
creators than job seekers), research potential and professionally ethical citizens.
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
Name: Dr.M.S.Murali
Designation: Principal
Mobile No: +91-9900028024
Email Id: principal@acsce.edu.in
NBA coordinator, if designated:
Name: R.Siva subramaniyam
Designation: Associate Professor
Mobile No: 9945535836
Email Id: rssbaby@gmail.com
7|Page

CRITERIA 1
VISION, MISSION
AND PROGRAM
EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES
8|Page

Part B
1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives
1.1 Vision and Mission
(List and articulate the vision and mission statements of the institute and department)
The Vision of the ACS College of Engineering is:
Engineering the future of the nation by transforming the students to be technically skilled managers,
innovative leaders and environmentally receptive citizens.
The Mission of the ACS College of Engineering is:
To implement holistic approach in curriculum and pedagogy through Industry Integrated Interactions
to meet the needs of Global Engineering Environment.
To develop students with knowledge, attitude and skill of employability, entrepreneurship (Be Job
creators than job seekers), research potential and professionally ethical citizens.
The Vision of the department of Computer Science and Engineering is:
To provide excellence knowledge and enrich the problem solving skills of the students in the field
of CSE with a focus to prepare the students for industry need, carry out research, recognized as
innovative leader, responsible citizen and improve the environment
The Mission of the department of CSE is:
Prepare the students with strong fundamental concepts, analytical capability, programming
and problem solving skills.
Create an ambience of education through faculty training, self learning, sound academic
practices and research endeavors.
Provide opportunities to promote organizational and leadership skills in students through
various extra- curricular and co-curricular events.
To make the students as for as possible industry ready to enhance their employability in the
industries.
To improve department industry collaboration through internship program and interaction
with professional society through seminar/workshops.
Imbibe social awareness and responsibility in students to serve the society and protect
environment
9|Page

1.2 Program Educational Objectives
The Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) of the department of CSE are given below:
PEO1: To provide the imperatives knowledge of science and engineering concepts fundamental for a
computer professional and equip the proficiency of mathematical foundations and algorithmic
principles for competent problem solving ability.
PE02: To inculcate ability in creativity & design of computer support systems and impart knowledge
and skills for analyze, design, test and implement various software applications
PE03: To exhibit leadership capability, triggering social and economical commitment and inculcate
community services and protect environment
1.3 Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated
among stakeholders
The Vision and the Mission of the Department are the fundamental bedrocks for its activities.
The entire program offered by the Department follow these.
1.3.1 Indicate how and where the Vision and Mission are published and disseminated
The Mission and Vision are published and disseminated through
College website- www.acsce.edu.in

Department page http://www.acsce.edu.in/department/computer-science-and-engineering/
HOD Chamber
Staff Rooms
Notice Boards of the department
Department Library
Department Laboratories
Department Corridor
1.3.2 State how and where the PEOs are published and disseminated
Dissemination of PEOs
The PEOs are published and disseminated through

College Website
Department page http://www.acsce.edu.in/department/computer-science-and-
engineering/
10 | P a g e

Notice Boards of the department

Surveys
Department Library
Department Laboratories
Department Corridor
HOD Chamber
Staff Rooms
1.3.3 List the stakeholders of the program

The stakeholders of the programme are
Students
Alumni
Faculty Members
Parents
Employers
1.4 State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the
program
1.4.1 Mention the process for defining Vision and Mission of the department
The process for defining Vision and Mission of the department was discussed in the department level
and it was established through a consultative process involving the stakeholders of the department,
the future scope of the department and the societal requirements as shown in
Figure 1.4.1. In establishing the vision and mission of the department, the following steps were
followed:
Step 1: Vision and Mission of the Institution are taken as basis
Step 2: Views are taken from stakeholders of the department such as students, faculty members,
parents, Employers and alumni.
Step 3: The views about the vision and mission of the department are formulated by the team of
faculty members of the department.
Step 4: The vision and mission are analyzed and reviewed to check the consistency with the vision
and mission of the department at the college level by NBA Quality Cell.
Step 5: Finally the Board of Management approve the vision and mission of the department.
11 | P a g e

Institute Vision &

Mission
SWOC
Students & Alumni
Department Vision Parents

Faculty
Department Mission
Employer
Department
Committee
NBA- Quality
Assurance Cell
Board of
Management
No
Satisfactory?
Yes
Publish Vision and

Mission
Figure 1.4.1 Process defining Department Vision & Mission
12 | P a g e

1.4.2 State the process for establishing the PEOs
(Describe the process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the PEOs are based on the
needs of the program various stakeholders.)
Figure 1.4.2 In establishing the vision and mission of the department, the following steps were
followed
The department draws upon constituents input to construct and periodically revise our PEOs. Data
are collected from constituents in various ways, some formal, systematic, and some not. We have
learned that some modes of input are much more effective than others in generating useful
information, and constantly improving our processes for gathering input from constituencies in
response to these experiences.
The Program Educational Objectives are established through a consultation process involving the
core constituents such as: Student, Alumni, Faculty, Employers and Parents. The PEOs are
established through the following process steps.
Step 1: Vision and Mission of the college are taken as basis.
Step 2: Vision and Mission of the department are taken as a basis to interact with various
stakeholders.
Step 3: The program coordinator collects the views of the stakeholders.
Step 4: On considering the views that were collected from the stakeholders, the PEOs are
formulated by the team of senior faculty members identified for the program.
Step 5: The PEOs are represented before the school level NBA-QC committee for additional
inputs to improvise the program
Step 6: Finally approves the PEOs.
13 | P a g e

Figure 1.4.2. PEO Definition & Assessment Process
14 | P a g e

1.4.2.1 The following are the various assessment process used to assess the attainment of PEOs.
BOM (Board of Management)

Lesson plan/Curriculum
NBA quality Cell
External Academic Audit
Alumni Meet
Parent Teachers Meet
Student feedback
Faculty Feedback
Employer Feedback
Workshops/ Guest Lectures/ Seminars
Data collection
Assessment Process Assessment Criteria Responsible Entity
frequency
Course content to meet

industry requirements
BOM Once in a Year College Level
and to pursue higher
studies
Lesson Plan Content Delivery Once in a semester Department
College level NBA Quality Improvements and

Once in a Semester College level
Cell suggestions
External Audit
Setting up of questions
Once in a year. Department
to attain PEOs.
LIC, ISO
Frequently Conducted
Workshops/ Guest Cutting edge
with at least 1 per Department
Lectures/ Seminars technology
semester
State of the art
CSE Association(RACE) Once in a Year Department
technology
Thrice in a semester ( I,II
Attendance Log Book Conduct of classes HOD
& III internals)
Feedback Assess Quality Once in a year/Semester College/Department
Parent Teachers Meet
Improvements and Department
Once in a semester
suggestions Coordinator
Improvements and
Alumni Meet Once in a Year College
suggestions
15 | P a g e

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department
Mission of the Department

Create an Provide
Prepare the ambience of opportunities
To make the Imbibe social
students with education to promote
students as for To improve awareness
strong through organizational
as possible department industry and
Program fundamental faculty and leadership
industry ready collaboration responsibility
Educational concepts, training, self skills in
to enhance through internship in students to
Objectives analytical learning, students
their program and serve the
(PEOs) capability, sound through
employability interaction with society and
programming academic various extra-
in the professional society protect
and problem practices and curricular and
industries. through environment
solving skills. research co-curricular
seminar/workshops
endeavors. events
To provide the
imperatives
knowledge of
science and
engineering
concepts
fundamental
for a computer
professional
and equip the 3 2
proficiency of
mathematical
foundations
and
algorithmic
principles for
competent
problem
solving ability.
16 | P a g e

To inculcate 1
ability in
creativity &
design of
computer
support
systems and
impart
knowledge and
3 2 1
skills for
analyze,
design, test and
implement
various
software
applications
To exhibit 3
leadership
capability,
triggering
social and
economical
commitment
1 2 3
and inculcate
community
services and
protect
environment
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
1.5.1. Justify the academic factors involved in achievement of the PEOs
Listed below are the factors that are involved in the attainment of the PEOs.
Curriculum and Syllabi

Lesson Plan
Course File
Assessments
17 | P a g e

Academic Audit
Feedback
Curriculum and Syllabi :

The various courses for each program were selected in accordance with the PSOs of
the program. The courses both regular and elective were mapped along with the achievement
of the PSO and accordingly distributed among the various semesters of the program. The
Syllabi for the courses are designed in line with the principles of outcome based education and
prime objective of attainment of the PSOs.
Lesson Plan :
A good curriculum and syllabi is effective only by a well planned teaching Learning
Process. In order to aid this, all the faculty prepare a lesson plan well before the
commencement of the classes. This includes the theory and lab courses. It involves not only
the contents of the syllabi but focus is given to content beyond syllabus. This lesson plan is
duly signed by the head of the department, discussed in the first class committee meeting and
then circulated amongst the concerned students also.
Course File :
It is a practice to maintain a course file for each theory courses. This keeps track of all
the activities carried out in the class room during the course delivery. This includes the time
table, lesson plan, record of content delivery, assessment component details, sample evaluated
answer scripts, marks of the continuous assessments tests and the performance analysis sheet
and remedial action. The performance analysis sheet and remedial actions taken sheet
provides a way for the course teacher to keep track of the students who have not performed
well and also monitor their performance in the next test. The course file also includes the
internal assessment, end semester marks and statement of grades. This course file is duly
monitored by the Head of the Department and maintained in the Department Library thus
serving as a reference for the teachers who handle the courses.
Assessments:
The students are evaluated on the basis their performance. This evaluation is done by way of
the continuous assessment tests and end semester examinations. For under graduate students
18 | P a g e

three continuous assessments and an end semester examination is conducted for every course.
The assessment marks are displayed to the students after every test and also properly
maintained. An entry of the internal marks is made in the attendance log books of every
course teacher.
Academic Audits (external):
The Academic Audit (LIC (Local Inspection Committee) and ISO Audit) comprises of
senior Professors constituted by VTU . The LIC committee offers suggestions in the question
paper and evaluation of the answer scripts. The committee thus monitors the quality of the
entire process for every course.
An NBA- Quality Assurance Cell (NBA-QC) is an integral part of the system .By assuring
that all the above mentioned are duly carried out the PEOs are achieved.
1.5.2. Explain how administrative system helps in ensuring the attainment of PEOs
The following administrative setup is put in place to ensure the attainment of PEOs NBA- QC
Program Coordinator
Course Coordinator
Department Assessment Committee Program (DCP)
Program Coordinator
Interacts and maintains liaison with key stake holders, students, faculty, Department Head and
employer.
Monitor and reviews the activities of each year in program (III/V/VII & IV/VI/VIII)
independently with course coordinators
Schedules program work plan in accordance with specifications of program objectives and
outcomes
Oversees daily operations and coordinates activities of program with interrelated activities of
other programs, departments or staff to ensure optimum efficiency and compliance with
appropriate policies, procedures and specifications given by HOD.
Conducts and interprets various surveys required to assess POs and PEOs.
Course Coordinator
Coordinates and supervise the faculty teaching the particular course in the module
19 | P a g e

Responsible for assessment of the course objectives and outcomes

Recommend and facilitate workshops, faculty development programs, meetings or conferences to
meet the course outcomes
Analyzes results of particular course and recommends the Program coordinator and/or Head of the
Department to take appropriate action
Liaise with students, faculty, program coordinator and Head of the Department to determine
priorities and policies
National Board of Accreditation Quality Assurance Cell (NBA-QC)
Supervises and guides the activities of department Committees and Teams.
Plans various development, delivery and assessment activities of PEOs and POs.
Prepare an outcome-based assessment plan (OBAP) with the same broad structure across all
programs to assessment PEOs and PO attainment.
Act as a guiding and monitoring body for all departments committees and teams.
Assumes responsibility of assessing availability of required resources and needed for
achieving PEOs and POs for each program based on the departmental Committees
recommendations.
Present the results to the management for improvements or corrective action.
Through TPO administers the survey with external stakeholders.
Obtain results of assessment of internal and external stakeholders including analysis of student
performance in tests, exams, assignments projects etc. from Assessment Committee -
Programmes (ACP).
Analyze the results of the assessment and present the same to Academic Advisory Board
(AAB).
Based on directions/decisions of Academic Advisory Board (AAB), initiate corrective actions
in revision of PEOs and POs.
Department Assessment Committee (DAC)
Assessment Committee Program consists of Program Coordinator, Module Coordinator and
faculty representatives
Chaired by Program Coordinator, the committee monitors the attainment of PO and PEOs.
Evaluates program effectiveness and proposes necessary changes
20 | P a g e

Prepares periodic reports records on program activities, progress, status or other special reports
for management key stake holders.
Motivates the faculty and students towards attending workshops, developing projects, working
models, paper publications and research
Interact with students, faculty, Program Coordinators, Module Coordinator and
outside/community agencies (through their representation)in facilitating program educational
objectives
ACP meets atleast once in 6 months to review the program and submits report to Department
Industrial Advisory Committee.
Department Assessment Committee List
S.no Name Position held Responsibilities

1 Dr C.S Pillai HOD Department In charge
2 Dr T.Senthil Kumaran NBA Coordinator NBA Incharge
3 Mr. Panchaxari Mamadapur Course outcome, Formulation of
Program Outcome, attainment
Mr. Vinoth kumar Program Specific
Outcome
4 Mr. Shiva Prasad Continuous Attainment of PO
improvement and PSO
Various Committee in charge of Department
Sl . No Committees Faculty Name
1 Time table Mrs. Jyoti Metan
2 Mentor Mr. Vinoth kumar
3 Internal Test Cell Mr. Panchaxari Mamadapur
4 Website Over all Mr. Krishna kumar
21 | P a g e

5 Departmental Website Mr. Mahantesh Mathapati
6 Symposium/ Dr. C. S Pillai

Conference/Workshop, etc
7 Professional bodies Dr. D. Sivakumar
8 Slow Learners/ Rank Holders Mr. Vinoth kumar
9 R & D In-charge Dr. Senthil Kumaran
10 PG In-charge Dr. Senthil Kumaran
11 Parent- Teachers Meeting Mrs. Kavita patil
12 1st Year Co-ordinators Mr. Mahantesh Mathapati
13 II year Class Teacher Mr. Vinoth kumar
14 III year Class Teacher Mrs. Kavita patil
15 IV year Class Teacher Mr. Shiva Prasad
16 Department Library Mrs. Sunita Chalegeri
17 Placement Mr. Shiva Prasad
18 Industrial visits Dr. C. S Pillai
19 Internship Dr. C. S Pillai
20 Newsletter Mrs. Sunita Chalegeri
21 Cultural Mrs. Usha M
22 Sports Mr. Shiva Prasad
23 Alumni Mrs. Jyoti Metan
24 Departmental Association Mr. Shiva Prasad
25 Student Seminar/ Mini Project Dr. D. Sivakumar

/Project
26 Over all Lab Coordinator Mr. Mahantesh Mathapati
22 | P a g e

27 Grievance & Redressal Cell Mr. Panchaxari Mamadapur
28 SHE Cell Mrs. Usha M
CRITERIA 2
PROGRAM
CURRICULUM AND
TEACHING
LEARNING
PROCESSES
23 | P a g e

Programme Curriculum
120
CRITERION II and Teaching-Learning
First Time
Processes
2. Programme Curriculum and Teaching-Learning Processes (120)
2.1 Programme curriculum:

2.1.1 State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University Curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure I.
Also mention the identified gaps, if any .
A. Process used to identify extent of compliance of the University Curriculum for attaining the
Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes.
The ACS College of Engineering is affiliated under Visvesvaraya Technical University, Belagavi.
So our programme curriculum is as per the scheme and syllabus of affiliated university. Generally
Curriculum maintains the balance in the composition of basic science, humanities, professional
courses and their distribution in core and elective and breadth offerings. If some components, to
attain COs/ POs, are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university then the
Institution makes additional efforts to impart such knowledge by covering aspects through
CONTENTS BEYOND SYLLABUS. We add content beyond syllabus by proper GAP analysis
process. The figure 2.1 gives the Curriculum Gap analysis and the figure 2.2 shows the process of
assessment of gap analysis.
List of Program Outcomes
PO1
Engineering Knowledge: Apply knowledge of mathematics and science,
with fundamentals of Computer Science & Engineering to be able to solve
complex engineering problems related to CSE.
PO2 Problem Analysis: Identify, Formulate, review research literature and

analyze complex engineering problems related to CSE and reaching
substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural
sciences and engineering sciences
24 | P a g e

PO3 Design/Development of solutions: Design solutions for complex

engineering problems related to CSE and design system components or
processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for
the public health and safety and the cultural societal and environmental
considerations
PO4 Conduct Investigations of Complex problems: Use researchbased

knowledge and research methods including design of experiments,
analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to
provide valid conclusions.
PO5
Modern Tool Usage: Create, Select and apply appropriate techniques,

resources and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and
modeling to computer science related complex engineering activities with
an understanding of the limitations
PO6 The Engineer and Society: Apply Reasoning informed by the contextual
knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and
the consequent responsibilities relevant to the CSE professional
engineering practice
PO7 Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the CSE

professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts
and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development
PO8 Ethics: Apply Ethical Principles and commit to professional ethics and
responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice
PO9 Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual and as

a member or leader in diverse teams and in multidisciplinary Settings
PO10 Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering

activities with the engineering community and with society at large such
as able to comprehend and with write effective reports and design
documentation, make effective presentations and give and receive clear
instructions.
PO11 Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and

understanding of the engineering management principles and apply these
to ones own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects
and in multi disciplinary environments
PO12 Life-Long Learning: Recognize the need for and have the preparation
and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning the broadest
context of technological change
25 | P a g e

List of PSOs
PS01: Foundation of mathematical concepts: To use mathematical methodologies to crack problem

using suitable mathematical analysis, data structure and suitable algorithm.
PSO2: Foundation of Computer System: the ability to interpret the fundamental concepts and
methodology of computer systems. Students can understand the functionality of hardware and
software aspects of computer systems.
PSO3: Foundations of Software development: the ability to grasp the software development lifecycle
and methodologies of software systems. Possess competent skills and knowledge of software design
process. Familiarity and practical proficiency with a broad area of programming concepts and provide
new ideas and innovations towards research
Process for Curriculum GAP ANALYSIS
Figure 2.1: Processes used to identify the curricular gaps to the attainment of the COs/POs
26 | P a g e

Figure 2.2: The process of assessment of gap analysis
B. List the curricular gaps for the attainment of defined POs and PSOs.
Recommended subjects to bridge academic and industry
Gap Identification
1. As per the University Curriculum, basics of Object Oriented Programming are introduced
in III semester. The Course Object Oriented Programming with C++ (10CS36) does not
introduce the real time applications using C++. Therefore a course on Programming skills
for real time applications using C++ was identified and an adjunct faculty from industry
was appointed.
2. As per the University curriculum, basics of Database Management System (10CS54) are
introduced in V semester. In todays world, Big Data Analytics is considered very relevant
27 | P a g e

and therefore a course on Big Data Analytics is identified for students of Vth semester and
an adjunct faculty to handle Big Data Analytics is applied.
3. As per the University Curriculum, Networks and Web Programming courses are
introduced in 6th Semester and 7th Semester. To bridge the gap between academics and
Industry, a course on Internet of Things (IoT) with awareness for hardware sensors is
introduced with an adjunct faculty from industry is appointed.
Programming skills for Real Time Applications using C++
Neural Network
Fuzzy logic
Big Data Analytics
IOT with awareness for hardware Sensors.
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of
POs and PSOs (10)
B. Delivery details of content beyond syllabus

Library/internet assignments on contemporary issues.
Additional laboratory experiments
Pre-placement Training
Training on Soft skills and value add programs
Creative /Projects
Guest lectures
Workshops/conference
Industrial Visits and internships
CAY
S.No. Gap Action Date- Resource Person % of Relevance to

taken Month- with designation students POs, PSOs
Year
1 .Net Seminar 3/02/2016 Mr. Md Ismail,software 90% PO8,9,10
Development PSO 1,3
2 Higher studies Seminar 3/03/2016 Mayank RM VISU 90% PO8,9,10
in abroad ACADEMY LTD PSO 1,3
28 | P a g e

e 3 Cloud Seminar 4/03/2016 Dr Mohan 90% PO8,9,10

n computing PSO 1,3
t 4 ERP and Technical 5/03/2016 Shivprakash B Chalgeri 100% PSO 1,2
i benefits Seminar HP IT PO8,9,10
o
n 5 Trends in IT- Guest 5/11/2015 Mr.Bharath Kumar 90% PO8,9,10
LMS and Lecturer Head-Technical PSO 1,3
i career path Operation.CMS-IT
n Services
6 Intelligent Guest 15/10/201 Dr.T.R.GopalKrishnan 90% PO8,9,10
d Systems a Lecture 5 Nair Former Seniour PSO 1,3
e transformation Scientist(ISRO) /
t in Engineering Former Vice President
a Approach Research
i 7 Industrial Guest 06/10/201 1. Mr.Sreenivasa 90% PO8,9,10
l Expectation Lecture 5 Ramanujam , TCS , PSO 1,3
from young Banglore
w Engineers 2. Mr.Gopal Singh
h Rajput, TCS , Banglore
2014-15

taken Month-Year with designation students POs, PSOs
1 Software Seminar 27/02/2015 Devanad Prasad V 90% P011,12

Testing MD Gensoft IT PSO 1,3
India
2 JAVA Seminar 9/03/2015 Mr.Pradeep 90% P011,12
Kumar Software PSO 1,3
Engineer Big Perl
Solution
Software Seminar 16/03/2015 Devanad Prasad V 100% PO8,9,10
3 Engineering MD Gensoft IT PSO 1,3
And Testing India
4 Higher Seminar 17/03/2015 Manayak RM 90% P011,12
studies in Visu Academy PSO 1,3
Abroad / LTD.
Training
5 Higher Seminar 30/03/2015 Europe Study 90% PO8,9,10
studies in Centre LTD PSO 1,3
Europe
6 Networking Conference 31/03/2015 Department of 90% P011,12
And Other CSE PSO 1,3
topic ACSCE
7 Ethical One day 13/04/2015 EIKON 90% PO8,9,10
Hacking and workshop technologies PSO 1,3
Cyber Banglore
Security
8 Microsoft Workshop 20/04/2015 Mr.Rohith EDU- 90% P011,12
29 | P a g e

Tools KINECT PSO 1,3

Hyderabad
9 TCS Projects Indutrial 21/05/2015 Adarsh K Babu 100% P011,12
and software Visit TCS PSO 1,3
Development SJM Towers
2013-14

taken Month-Year with designation students POs, PSOs
Skills and Tecnical 14/08/2013 K Ravindra 90% PO1,4,7

trips in Talk PSO 1,2
1
Programming
Domain
Cyber Crime Tecnical 21/08/2013 Dr.Nandi Dharma 95% PO 2,6,9
2 and Talk Kishore(Research PSO 2,3
Malwares Scientist-11)
Object Seminar 31/08/2013 Mr.Venkat Reddy P 90% PO1,4,7
3 Thinking and S PSO 1,2
Programming
Cyber Crime Seminar 25/09/2013 Mr.Sandeep 90% PO 2,6,9
4 And Ethical PSO 2,3
Hacking
Android Workshop 1/10/2013 Mr.ragavendra 90% PO1,4,7
5
Development PSO 1,2
Industry Technical 29/03/2014 Mr.Prasanth 95% PO1,4,7
6 Exposure Talk Nambiar , SPAN PSO 1,2
Infotech
Soft Skill Workshop 07/04/2014 Mr.Karthik , Data 90% PO 2,6,9
7 development to Grid Technology PSO 2,3
11/04/2014
Android Technical 24/04/2014 Mr.Arafath 90% PO1,4,7
8 Framework Talk Abobacker , NIIT , PSO 1,2,3
Banglore
Web design Technical 28/04/2014 Mr.R.Sridhar and 90% PO1,4,7
9 Training Talk To Mr.Kiran,#DEFINE PSO 1,2
29/04/2014
30 | P a g e

C. Mapping of content beyond Syllabus with the PO's & PSO's
POs
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Topics
Pre-placement

Training
Training on

Soft skills
Creative /

Hobby Projects
Guest lectures
workshops
Industrial Visits
PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Topics
Pre-placement Training
Training on Soft skills
Creative / Hobby Projects

Guest lectures
workshops
Industrial Visits
31 | P a g e

2.2 Teaching Learning Process
2.2.1 Describe processes followed to improve quality of teaching and learning
A. Adherence to Academic calendar (Institute and Department calendar):
From the college calendar of events a department calendar of events is derived which is
specific to the department.
Lesson plan with course objectives and course outcomes are prepared by the subject handling
faculty before the commencement of the semester and is dually approved by the Head of the
department and made available to the students. Lesson plan is published in the college management
software. According to the lesson plan, work done has been inculcated in the academic file to ensure
coverage of syllabus dually monitored by Head of the department.
Maintenance of Course files:

For each course, a course file is prepared by the concerned faculty. The course file consists of
following items.
Teaching plan:
Teaching plans for each and every course are prepared by the faculty. Whole syllabus is divided into
8 units and 52 lectures as per the teaching scheme prescribed by the university.
The course objectives are defined for each course in line with the POs.
32 | P a g e

Lesson plan
Lesson plans are prepared for each lecture in the teaching plan by the faculty before the
commencement of the semester and it is duly approved after careful examination by the Head of the
Department and made available to the students.
The lesson plan encompasses the learning outcomes and the assessment of outcomes.
Question Bank:
Question banks are prepared for each topic in the course based on the course objectives
and considering the nature of the university question papers. The previous question
papers of University are also maintained in the course files.
Assignment questions list and test question papers along with key solutions are included in
the course files
B. Use of Various instructional methods and pedagogical initiatives:
Lecture method and Interactive learning:

The faculty use chalk and board and audio visual aids in teaching. Students are also
encouraged to actually interact during the lecture hour by getting the doubts clarified on the
spot. faculty using models , charts for interactive teaching
Figure 2.3 Class teaching photo
Project-based learning:
During the period of study in the 6th to 8th semester, many real time projects are given
to the students and they are guided by both faculty and Industry/Research personnel.
Computer-assisted learning:
The College has required number of computers, printers, LCD projectors, application
softwares and system softwares. These are effectively used for teaching. The students are
also encouraged to develop softwares for the solution of the assignments and tutorials. Many
final year projects are completed through the use of software.
33 | P a g e

SMART class Room
Faculty are using SMART class room to interactive session. projector is used for
demonstration ,video (NPTEL),audio of classes
C. Methodologies to support weak students and encourage bright students:

Guidelines to identify weak students
The Counselors regularly conduct meetings regarding progress of their mentees and are responsible to
identify students who scored less than 60% marks in their internals. Under the HOD direction, the
students Counselors evaluates the progress card of those students who score below 60% marks in
three or more subject and below 75% attendance are considered as academically weak students and
same is also intimated to their parents.
MENTORING SYSTEM
Identification Criteria Actions taken
Students scoring less than 60% of marks in 1. Student counselor follows their
Internal Assessment. progress regularly advising students
about attending classes, making up
classes missed, and getting additional
help.
2. Intimating parents to counsel their
wards.
3. Conduction of remedial classes
Diploma students who entered with less basics Conduction of remedial classes.
of mathematics
Students who fail in semester exams Conduction of extra classes to those who failed
in previous semester subjects.
Guidelines to identify Bright students
Identification Criteria Actions taken
FCD functions are conducted to felicitate those

students and Mementos are also distributed to
Students awarded with First Class with motivate them to continue their Excellency in
Distinction (FCD) in their Semester exams. academics. to take up mini projects&
encourage to participate in inter college
national/international fest, motivate to take
34 | P a g e

civil exams
Top three students of each class. Awarded with mementos
Students securing ranks at University level. Distribution of Gold medals
Process for Encouraging Bright Students and Assisting Weak Students
HOD
Class Course Mentor

Teacher Faculty
Academic &
Poor Academic Identification of Weak Identification of Bright Overall
Performance
Students Students Performance
Assisting Weak students Encouraging Bright Students
Assignments Remedial Classes Shared Classroom Professional Inspire Student

leadership Development Creativity
.Assign certain .to attend .Intercollegiate
topics to build their conferences fest
.Training .State & National
confidence
internship events
.Encourage Peer .Workshops .Compete in
Learning .Participating in State& National
seminars Events
.Competitive
exams
Figure 2.4 Process for Encouraging Bright Students and Assisting Weak Students
35 | P a g e

D. Quality of classroom teaching:
The following innovative teaching methods are adopted by the faculty:
Computers are used for teaching purposes and internet facility is available to students and
faculty.
Faculty members are taking advantage of sources like National Programme on Technology
Enhanced Learning (NPTEL), internet sources for effective teaching.
Smart Board, LCDs etc. are used for teaching purposes.
Online availability of various journals in the intranet.
Well structured lesson plans are prepared / revised for all theory and practical courses on a
period to period basis, scrutinized by HODs and made available in the website for students
access.
E. Conduct of Experiments:
Curriculum stipulates 2 laboratory courses per semester from 1st to 7th semester. Students
carry out more than the required number of experiments, beyond the minimum specified by the
University. All laboratory have excellent facilities, both hardware and software based. For the
experiments detailed instruction manuals are provided. The observations are checked and verified by
faculty and record books are maintained systematically. Two faculty members and one instructor are
assigned for each practical class.
F. Continuous Assessment in laboratory:
Continuous assessment system is also implemented for assessment of laboratory work. The
assessment is done on the basis of submission of laboratory records, understanding of the experiment
through oral viva voce questions and participation in performing the experiment. Neatness of the
laboratory record book is also given weightage in the assessment.
G. Student feedback of teaching learning process and actions taken:
At the end of the semester, all the students are required to fill a feedback-form apprising the
faculty using a scale of 1 (high) through 10 (low).
(Format attached)
Lecture classes are monitored by senior Professors and the HoD of the Department. They give
constructive comments to improve the quality of teaching and the teaching- learning process.
Counseling by the respective HoD for those faculty members who have secured low scores
and negative comments, if any, in the feedback. This motivates them to improve their skills
and abilities.
If required training / orientation programmes are conducted by professional experts to master
the skills of the faculty members in the nuances of teaching, thus improving the efficiency of
teaching-learning process.
36 | P a g e

2.2.2 Quality of Internal Semester Question Papers, Assignments and Evaluation
(Mention the initiatives, implementation details and Analysis of Learning levels related to quality of
Semester question papers, assignments and evaluation)
A .Process for Internal Semester Question Paper setting and evaluation and effective process
implementation:
In a semester, there are three tests. Each of the test consists of descriptive questions as well as
quizzes. The average of the best two tests is considered for final internal assessment.
Start
Defining Course Outcomes for every

course
Setting of questions of internal question

papers based on reference to prescribed
texts, model question papers,
Mapping of questions to POS, CO&, BT
Defining of scheme of evaluation for the

question paper
Evaluation of answer sheets based on

scheme
Marks scored by the student in every test

is sent to their parents
Process from step 2 to step 5 is repeated

for the three tests
37 | P a g e

Average
Averageof
ofbest
best two internal
internalmarks
marksis is
calculated
calculated
If the average obtained by the student is

less than 35 and if the student is eligible
for extra test due to valid reasons like
illness with medical certificate or cultural
and other academic activities by college
False True
Extra Test is given to the student to

secure minimum average
Final marks secured by the student is

scaled from 50 to 25 and
Teacher
Performance
Stop
Overall
Perfor
Students
38 | P a g e

Blooms Taxonomy is followed while setting the internal exam question papers where the following
strategy is applied.
The internal test consists of 50Marks of subjective questions
B. Process to ensure questions from outcomes/learning level perspectives
Each question is mapped with CO's PO's & Blooms taxonomy (BT) levels .Student who answered to
particular question is taken into consideration and average of all students marks is taken for CO -PO
attainment
C. Evidence of COs Coverage in class test/Mid-term test
Individual students blue book is evaluated and question answered by student is mapped with
CO's and PO's
Sample is shown in annexure -1 CO -PO attainment
D. Quality of assignment and its relevance to CO's
After the completion of every unit assignment questions will be given to students, and student
has to write it & submit within a week and each question is mapped with CO's .So the students will be
able to understand course outcome of particular subject.
2.2.3. Quality of Student Projects
2.2.3.1. Initiatives
The students projects are selected in line with department mission, vision and Program outcomes.
Students are provided with brief idea of various fields for selecting the project ideas.
The list of previous year projects is displayed at notice board which ensures no repetition of project
work and also encourages students to enhance the previous works.
The faculties encourage the students to carry out in house projects and support will be provided with
all necessary software and hardware.
The faculties encourage students to participate in project exhibitions. The project exhibition was aimed
to provide common platform to exhibit their innovations and their work towards excellence in latest
technology.
The faculties encourage students to publish their project work in reputed journals/conferences.
The faculties encourage students to avail the external funding schemes for their project work. (like
KSCST, VTU project funding scheme)
Evaluation scheme for final year Project
39 | P a g e

2.2.3.1.1. Implementation
A project coordinator is appointed by the Head of the department who is responsible for planning,
scheduling and execution of all the activities related to the student project work.
2.2.3.1.2. Impact analysis
New innovative ideas are born for project work

Skills or abilities of students improved.
Knowledge on various aspects of project management were developed
Confidence level of the students was boosted
Improved teamwork spirit
Implementation and deployment of the project for social benefits.
Document preparation and presentation.
More tendencies to showcase their project work in project exhibition were observed.
A. Identification of projects and allocation methodology to Faculty Members. (3)
Projects are identified to relevant context. The need for the project and the end users of the
project are verified for the current context.
The problem definition with their requirements and constraints are verified.
The knowledge, methodology, skill set and interest of the students to implement the project
are considered to undertake the projects.
Faculties of higher cadre are allocated as guides to guide the students project.
Each project team varies from two to four students.
Faculty profile should match with the domain of the students project.
Students are also given choice to choose their guide that matches their project domain.
40 | P a g e

Timeline Task Particulars

SEMESTER SEVEN
Students are invited to prepare their batch and get it
registered with the project coordinator of the
Call for project department. They will receive project batch
2nd week batch and guide identification number which is used as reference
allotment throughout the academic year.
With respect to the areas of interest of each guide the
batches will assign to a guide.
Students are instructed to submit the title of the
Call for Project
th
5 week project in consultation with their respective guide in a
Titles
given proforma to the project coordinator.
Synopsis The student submitting project titles are pre-
12th week
submission evaluated by a team of faculty.
Project title The submitted project titles are reviewed by a
finalization and committee consisting of Project coordinator, Head of
14th week
Abstract the department and some senior faculties.
submission
SEMESTER EIGHT
Students are instructed to submit Software
requirement specification and give a PowerPoint
4th week First Review
presentation for the project. (Evaluation phase I by a
team of faculty)
Students are instructed to submit Design document of
8th week Second Review the project and give a PowerPoint presentation for the
project. (Evaluation phase II by a team of faculty)
Students are instructed to submit complete project
Final report will university compliances and give a
12th week
Demonstration PowerPoint presentation for the project. (Evaluation
phase III by a team of faculty)
Project internal The marks for the project work is announced and
14th week marks processed according to the university regulations.
announcement
41 | P a g e

B. Types and relevance of the projects and their contribution towards attainment of POs.
Current academic projects are mapped to POs and PSOs.

Each project is evaluated with internal marks and are graded according to their project quality
and with their contribution towards attainment of POs.
C. Process for monitoring and evaluation.
Project students should meet their respective guide weekly once and asked to explain their
progress they have done in their project in that week.
They should submit project progress report weekly once and to get approved by the respective
guide.
The project guides will evaluate the report submitted by the students and help them to go with
project work.
Project guide will each assess each student in team and make them work in right way.
The following committee members are responsible for making the regulations for evaluation and for complete
evaluation process
Dr B S Pradeep
Dr. C.S.Pillai
Dr.senthil kumaran
and respective Giudes
Phase 1
Sl.No. Performance Indicator Marks

1 Title & Feasibility (10)
2 Abstract & Depth of Knowledge (10)
3 Presentation (10)
Phase 2

1 Design and analysis (15)
2 Implementation strategy (07)
3 Expected Result (03)
4 Presentation (10)
42 | P a g e

Phase 3
1 Implementation /Execution 15
2 Results 05
2 Final report (10)
4 Overall presentation 05
D. Process to assess individual and team performance
Project progress seminars are conducted once in every month by the team of their respective
guide, a professor cadre faculty, an Associative professor and an Assistant professor.
The project seminar should be given by all the project team members according to the division
of project.
Each student in the project team is assessed to their skill set to deliver the seminar, explain the
concept and way to make project assess team to understand their work.
Each individual and team performance is purely based on this project seminar presentation
and the viva voice and progress work they show to their guide.
E. Quality of completed projects/working prototypes
Final project demo for the working prototype and the report are evaluated by a team of their
respective guide, a professor cadre faculty, an Associate professor and an Assistant professor.
The projects are evaluated and are awarded internal assessment marks for maximum 100 and
are graded according to the project contribution towards attainment of POs and PSOs.
Best Project Evaluation scheme

Innovations recognize the need for lifelong learning,
Contemporary issues, organization of the report,
Listening to and answering questions,
Publications and internal and external marks,
Project exhibition results
43 | P a g e

Best three Projects (2015-2016)
SL Guide Relevance to POs &PSOs

Project Title Name
No. Name
PO6,7,10,11
Analysis Of Scale Mr.Akash
1 effects in peer-to-peer Dalmia Mr. Mahantesh PSO: 1,2,3
Networks Mr.Rakesh J
Path reconstruction in 6,7,10,9

Mr.Rajat Kuma
2 WSN using compressive
Mr.Saurabh R .
Mrs.Usha
PSO 1,2,,3
sensing
Secure data aggregation
Ms.Apeksha 6,7,8,9
techniques for WSN in Mrs.Kavitha
3 the presence of collusion Ms.Bhargavi PSO 1,2,,3
attack

Relevance to POs
SL No. Project Title Name Guide Name
& PSOs
Privacy Presenting Mr.Nitin

Multi Keyword Po:6,7,10,11
Mrs. Sunitha
1 Ranked Search Over
Mr.Ragavendra PSO:1, 2,3
Encrypted Cloud
Data
Dynamic Resource Ms.Meghashree
Allocation Using
Virtual Machine for
Cloud Computing Po: 6,7,8,9
Mr.Shiva Prasad
2 Environment Energy
Ms.Nischita PSO 1,2,,3
Efficient Reliable
Routing Residual
Energy In Wireless
Adhoc Network
Ms.Gayathri
Captcha as
Graphical Password- PO: 6,7,9,10
Ms.Usha
3 A New Security
Ms.Pooja PSO : 1,2,3
Primitive Based on
AI Problems
44 | P a g e


Relevance to POs
&PSOs
Gunashree S
Umme salma PO: 6,7,8,9
1 Collaborating in Multi Dr. Selvarani
Sangeetha R
cloud Computing PSO: 1,2,3
Pushpanjali
Ajay Kumar
Intrusion Deyection Amit B S

Tech using K Means Ajagayya G Mrs. Jyoti PO: 6,7,10,9
2
Fuzzy Nural N/w & Amey chittar Metan PSO : 1,2,3
SVM classifier
Jagadeshwari
Security Analysis Of Adarsh B S
single Sign on PO: 6,7,10,9
3 Mohan R Mr Shiva Prasad
mechanism for
Shashiprasad PSO : 1,2,3
distributed computer
Network Praveen Kumar

Relevance to POs
&PSOs
Mohan N
TAM : a Tried authentication PO : 6,7,10,11
1 of Multicast protocol for Manoj Aithal Nagarajan
PSO : 1,2,3
Adhoc n/w Mahesh S
Satish P
Yashwini PO: 6,7,8,9

2 Secure Authentication M . Selvi
scheme in wireless N/w Smitha M R PSO : 1,2,3
Rakesh Kumar
Chaithra
The Digital Merauder's Map : Lochana PO: 6,7,8,9
3 A WiFi Forensic Poisoning Dr. Brahmanand
Menaka R PSO: 1,2,3
Tool
Gauthami V
45 | P a g e

F. Evidences of Papers Published/Awards received by projects.
Student will present their paper related to project in conference/journal etc
2015-16
Sl no Event Student name Title
1 National Apeksha kulkarni Secure data aggregation technique for wireless

Conference sensor networks in the presence of collusion
SPCN-16 Bhargavi G attack
2 National Akash Dalmia Novel Method for data aggregation in WSN

Conference
SPCN-16 Rakesh Jangid
2014-15
Sl Event Student name Title

No
1. National 1.Raghavendra Privacy-Preserving Multi-Keyword Ranked
Conference Rao C.S& NItin Search Over Encrypted Cloud Data
SPCN-15
2. National Rachana.R Privacy Preserving Through Shared Authority
Conference In Cloud Computing
SPCN-15
3. National Deeksha S P A Survey On Publish/Subscribe System
Conference
SPCN-15
4. National Ms. Gayathri & Captcha as Graphical Password A new Security
Confernce pooja Perimitive Based on AI problem
SPCN-15
5. National Ms. Nischita & Dynamic Resource Allocation Using Virtual
Conference Ms. Meghashre Machine for Cloud Computing Environment Energy
SPCN-15 Efficient Reliable Routing Residual Energy In
Wireless Adhoc Network
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction
MOUs with Industries
46 | P a g e

MOUs was done with industries to emphasize on

(a) Internship
(b) Project Workshop for Students
(c) Industrial Visits
(d) Students specific Training
(e) Faculty Development Program
Sl.no Company Name Date
1. Eduwizw Private Limited 16/03/2016
2. CMS IT Services Private Limited 05/11/2015
3. Data Grid Technologies Pvt.. Ltd., 03/04/2014

Bangalore 560070
4. SEED Infotech Limited 16/09/2013
S.NO Name Year Internship Topic Company
1 Afshan Hussain
SMS GATEWAY
2 Gousia Nisba
2015-16 INTEGRATION
3 Jaya Apoorva INTO ERP
4 Sharmilaa S
Eduwize
5 Assif Imran
SMS GATEWAY
6 Prashanth Shan 2015-16
INTEGRATION
7 Rakesh Kumar
INTO ERP
8 Thanush B N
47 | P a g e

Table 2.1: student list attended for internship under MOU students have done their internship under
Eduwize Pvt Ltd
2.2.4.2. Implementation
Many invited talks and seminars from industry resource persons are arranged and department invites
the participant from various department and also participants from other colleges.
2.2.5 Initiatives related to Industry Internship / summer training
The students are encouraged to take internship program during their semester break. Faculty
members give their guidelines, suggestions and scope and contact details of an internship.
They also help the students by interacting with the industrial experts, provide the students
recommendation letters and other necessary supports. The alumni coordinator constantly
interacts with alumni those who are working in the industries and request them to provide
necessary guidelines and supports for their juniors internship.
A. Industry training/tours for Students
Type of Event: IISc Visit for First year Students

Event Duration: Open Day (05/03/2016)
Venue: Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
Type of Event: TCS Industrial Visit

Event Duration:11/09/2014
Venue: Tata Consultancy services Anathrao circle branch, Bangalore
48 | P a g e

Industrial Visit to TCS
B. Industrial /Internship/summer Training of More than two week and Post training
Assessment
S.NO Name Year Internship Topic Company
1 Deeksha S P
2 Gayathri A V
3 Pooja S 2014-15
ANDRAID Technospacio
4. Madan K S APPLICATION & Pvt. Ltd.,
DEVELOPMENT Bangalore
5. Nithin Gujjar
2014-15
6. Pradeep Kumar K
7. Raghavendra Rao C S
8 Afshan Hussain
SMS GATEWAY
9 Gousia Nisba
2015-16 INTEGRATION
10 Jaya Apoorva INTO ERP
11 Sharmilaa S
Eduwize
12 Assif Imran
SMS GATEWAY
13 Prashanth Shan 2015-16
INTEGRATION
14 Rakesh Kumar
INTO ERP
15 Thanush B N
C . Impact Analysis of industrial training
a. Gain Valuable Work Experience

b. Have an Edge in the Job Market
49 | P a g e

c. Transition into a Job

d. Decide if this is the Right Career for You
e. Networking Opportunities
f. Apply Classroom Knowledge
g. Gain Confidence
D. Student Feedback on Initiative
After Each visit we will take student feedback on programme /industrial visit on initiative
taken. feedback is considered to do further improvement for the same .
50 | P a g e

CRITERIA 3
COURSE OUTCOMES
AND PROGRAM
OUTCOMES
51 | P a g e

3 COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES
3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
List of PSOs
PS01: Foundation of mathematical concepts: To use mathematical methodologies to crack problem

using suitable mathematical analysis, data structure and suitable algorithm.
PSO2: Foundation of Computer System: the ability to interpret the fundamental concepts and
methodology of computer systems. Students can understand the functionality of hardware and
software aspects of computer systems.
PSO3: Foundations of Software development: the ability to grasp the software development lifecycle
and methodologies of software systems. Possess competent skills and knowledge of software design
process. Familiarity and practical proficiency with a broad area of programming concepts and provide
new ideas and innovations towards research
List of Program Outcomes
PO1
Engineering Knowledge: Apply knowledge of mathematics and science,
with fundamentals of Computer Science & Engineering to be able to solve
complex engineering problems related to CSE.
PO2 Problem Analysis: Identify, Formulate, review research literature and

analyze complex engineering problems related to CSE and reaching
substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural
sciences and engineering sciences
PO3 Design/Development of solutions: Design solutions for complex
engineering problems related to CSE and design system components or
processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for
the public health and safety and the cultural societal and environmental
considerations
PO4 Conduct Investigations of Complex problems: Use researchbased

knowledge and research methods including design of experiments,
analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to
provide valid conclusions.
52 | P a g e

PO5 Modern Tool Usage: Create, Select and apply appropriate techniques,
resources and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and
modeling to computer science related complex engineering activities with
an understanding of the limitations
PO6 The Engineer and Society: Apply Reasoning informed by the contextual
knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and
the consequent responsibilities relevant to the CSE professional
engineering practice
PO7 Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the CSE

professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts
and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development
PO8 Ethics: Apply Ethical Principles and commit to professional ethics and
responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice
PO9 Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual and as

a member or leader in diverse teams and in multidisciplinary Settings
PO10 Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering

activities with the engineering community and with society at large such
as able to comprehend and with write effective reports and design
documentation, make effective presentations and give and receive clear
instructions.
PO11 Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and

understanding of the engineering management principles and apply these
to ones own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects
and in multi disciplinary environments
PO12 Life-Long Learning: Recognize the need for and have the preparation
and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning the broadest
context of technological change
53 | P a g e

Correlation between POs PSOs
POs PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
PO-1 3
PO-2 2
PO-3 2
PO-4 2
PO-5 2 2
PO-6 1
PO-7 2
PO-8 2 3
PO-9 2 3
PO-10 2 2
PO-11 2 3
PO-12 3 3 3
54 | P a g e

3.1.1Course Outcomes (COs)
S.No Subject Course Outcomes
1 COMPUTER CONCEPTS AND C CO1: Able to have fundamental knowledge on

PROGRAMMING:10CCP13/10CCP23 basics of computers hardware and number
systems. Able to understand the basic
terminology used in computer programming
CO2: Able to write, compile and debug programs

in C language.
Able to use different data types in a computer

program.
CO3: Able to design programs involving

decision structures, loops and functions. Able to
understand the dynamics of memory by the use of
pointers.
CO4: Able to use different data structures and

create/update basic data files.
2 LOGIC DESIGN:10CS33 CO1:Ability to understand the basic gates, SOP

and POS simplifications
CO2: Analyze the working of Multiplexers,
Demultiplexers, PAL, PLA.
CO3:Ability to understand the working of Flip-

Flops, Registers, Counters
CO4: Ability to Design of Synchronous and

Asynchronous Sequential Circuit and D/A
Converters and A/D Converter.
3 OBJECT ORIENTED CO1: Gain the basic knowledge on Object

PROGRAMMINGS WITH C++: Oriented concepts.
10CS36
CO2: Ability to develop applications using
Object Oriented Programming Concepts.
CO3: Ability to implement features of object

oriented programming to solve real world
55 | P a g e

problems.
CO4:Students get good understanding in the

fundamentals of object oriented programming
which includes class scope, constructors ,
destructors and overloading concepts
4 UNIX SHELL PROGRAMMING: CO1:Identify and use UNIX/Linux utilities to

10CS44 create and manage simple file processing
operations, organize directory structures with
appropriate security, and develop shell scripts
to perform more complex tasks.
CO2: Effectively use the UNIX/Linux system to

accomplish typical personal, office, technical,
and software development tasks.
CO3: Monitor system performance and network

activities. Effectively use software development
tools including libraries, preprocessors,
compilers, linkers, and make files.
CO4: Comprehend technical documentation,

prepare simple readable user documentation and
adhere to style guidelines.
5 COMPUTER ORGANIZATION: CO1:Ability to understand the organization of

10CS46 computer and machine instructions and programs
CO2:Ability to understand Input / Output

Organization
CO3: Analyze the working of the memory

system and basic processing unit.
CO4: Ability to solve problems of multicores,

multiprocessors and clusters.
6 OPERATING SYSTEMS: 10CS53 CO1:To understand the role and responsibilities

of OS in the computer system.
CO 2: To explain how the OS deals with process

management, memory management and
56 | P a g e

secondary storage management.
CO 3: To analyze process synchronization and

deadlocks.
CO 4: To apply the knowledge about OS, for the

Linux operating system case study.
7 DATABASE MANAGEMENT CO1: Able to apply the concepts and design

SYSTEMS: 10CS54 database for given information system.
CO2: Develop database programming skills in

SQL.
CO3: Apply the concepts of Normalization and

design database which possess no anomalies.
CO4: Able to write application programs

considering the issues like concurrency control,
recovery and security.
8 COMPUTER NETWORKS - II: CO1:To understand packet switching networks

10CS64 and routing in packet switching networks with
different routing algorithms.
CO2:To describe traffic management at packet

level, flow level and flow aggregate levels of
packet switching networks.
CO3:To explain the architecture of TCP/IP and

protocols associated with TCP/IP and to analyze
the network applications, network management
and security issues
CO4: To apply the knowledge about QoS, VPNs,

and tunneling and overlay networks and to
understand mobile networking and wireless
sensor networking.
9 UNIX SYSTEM CO1: Learn architecture of UNIX O.S,

PROGRAMMING:10CS62 understanding of Kernel and Shell. UNIX system
documentation
57 | P a g e

CO2:Apply Unix commands, piping, quoting,

escaping and redirections to solve a common
problem and ability to use of the vi text editor to
create and modify files
CO3: Ability to use wild cards and formulate

regular expressions for pattern matching and
grep, sed and awk to solve common problems
and generate report..
CO4Create and demonstrate shell scripts using

basic constructs and use shell debugging
mechanisms to improve shell program efficiency
and detect and correct errors
10 ADVANCED COMPUTER CO1: Foundation for readers to study hardware

ARCHITECTURES: 10CS74 and software..
CO2: Design of scalable computer system.
CO3:Internal data forwarding, software

interlocking, hardware score boarding
CO4:Hazards avoidance, branch handling and

instruction issuing techniques
CO5:We will learn verity of hardware and

software techniques that allow us to take
advantage of instruction level parallelism to fully
utilize the potential of the functional units
CO6:How to use simpler compiler technology to

enhance a processor ability to exploit ILP.
11 INFORMATION AND NETWORK CO1:Analyze the possible security attacks in

SECURITY: 10CS835 complex real time systems and their effective
counter measures
CO2:Identify the security issue in the network

and resolve it
CO3:Explain and analyze the basic

58 | P a g e

Cryptographic algorithm for security
CO4:Evaluate security mechanism using

rigorous approaches
3.1.2 CO-PO MATRICES OF COURSES
LOGIC DESIGN:10CS33
COs POs
CO1:Ability to 3 2 2
understand the
basic gates, SOP
and POS
simplifications
CO2: Analyze the 3
working of
Multiplexers,
Demultiplexers,
PAL,PLA.
CO3:Ability to 3 3 2 2
understand the
working of Flip-
Flops, Registers,
Counters
2 2 2
CO4: Ability to
Design of
Synchronous and
Asynchronous
Sequential Circuit
and D/A
Converters and
A/D Converter.
COMPUTER ORGANIZATION: 10CS46

COs POs
CO1:Ability to 3 2 2 1
understand the
organization of
computer and machine
instructions and
59 | P a g e

programs
CO2:Ability to 2 2 2 2 2 2
understand Input /
Output Organization
CO3: Analyze the 2 2 2 2 3 2
working of the memory
system and basic
processing unit.
CO4: Ability to solve 3 3 3 2 2 2
problems of multicores,
multiprocessors and
clusters.
DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: 10CS54

COs POs
CO1: Able to apply the 1 2 2 3
concepts and design
database for given
information system.
CO2: Develop 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3
database programming
skills in SQL.
CO3: Apply the 1 2 2 3 2
concepts of
Normalization and
design database which
possess no anomalies.
CO4: Able to write 1 1 3 2 2 2
application programs
considering the issues
like concurrency
control, recovery
and security.
UNIX SYSTEM PROGRAMMING:10CS62

COs POs
Learn architecture of 2 1 2 3 2 1 2
UNIX O.S,
understanding of
Kernel and Shell.
UNIX system
documentation
60 | P a g e

Apply Unix commands, 1 3 2 1 2 3

piping, quoting,
escaping and
redirections to solve a
common problem and
ability to use of the vi
text editor to create and
modify files
Ability to use wild 2 2 3 1 3 3
cards and formulate
regular expressions for
pattern matching and
grep,sed and awk to
solve common
problems and generate
report..
Create and demonstrate 1 3 3 2 2 3 1
shell scripts using basic
constructs and use
shell debugging
mechanisms to improve
shell program
efficiency and detect
and correct errors
COMPUTER NETWORKS - II: 10CS64

COs POs
CO1: To understand 2 3 2
packet switching
networks and routing in
packet switching
networks with
different routing
algorithms.
CO2: To describe 2 2 1 2 1 2
traffic management at
packet level, flow level
and flow aggregate
levels of packet
switching networks.
CO3:To explain the 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 3
architecture of TCP/IP
and protocols
associated with TCP/IP
61 | P a g e

and to analyze the

network applications,
network management
and security issues
CO4: To apply the 1 2 2 3
knowledge about QoS,
VPNs, tunneling and
overlay networks and
to understand
mobile networking and
wireless sensor
networking.
Java & J2EE: 10CS753

COs POs
CO1: Understand 3 2
OOPs concepts, Java
programming
constructs and JVM
and byte codes
CO2:Able to write 3 2 1 3
Simple java programs
using Classes,
Inheritance, Exception
handling and applets
CO3:Develop programs 3 3 3 2 2
using thread concepts
and swings
CO4:Develop simple 3 2 2 2
Java applications with
JDBC connective
CO5:Demonstrate the 2 3 3 2 2 2 3
advanced J2EE
concepts using
Servelets, Java RMI
and EJB
62 | P a g e

INFORMATION AND NETWORK SECURITY: 10CS835

COs POs
CO1:Analyze the 3 3 2
possible security
attacks in complex real
time systems and their
effective counter
measures
CO2:Identify the 2 3 2 3 2
security issue in the
network and resolve it
CO3:Explain and 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 3
analyze the basic
Cryptographic
algorithm for security
CO4:Evaluate security 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3
mechanism using
rigorous approaches
CO-PSO MATRICES OF COURSES
LOGIC DESIGN:10CS33
COs PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
CO1:Ability to understand the basic gates, SOP and POS simplifications 3 2 1

CO2: Analyze the working of Multiplexers, Demultiplexers, 3 2
PAL,PLA.
CO3:Ability to understand the working of Flip-Flops, Registers, 3 2
Counters
CO4: Ability to Design of Synchronous and Asynchronous Sequential 3 2
Circuit and D/A Converters and A/D Converter.
COMPUTER ORGANIZATION: 10CS46

COs PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
CO1:Ability to understand the organization of computer and machine 3 2 1

instructions and programs
CO2:Ability to understand Input / Output Organization 2 3
CO3: Analyze the working of the memory system and basic processing 2 3
unit.
CO4: Ability to solve problems of multicores, multiprocessors and 3 2
clusters.
63 | P a g e

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: 10CS54

COs PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
CO1: Able to apply the concepts and design database for given 3 3
information system.
CO2: Develop database programming skills in SQL. 2 3
CO3: Apply the concepts of Normalization and design database which 3 2
possess no anomalies.
CO4:Able to write application programs considering the issues like 1 3
concurrency control, recovery and security.
UNIX SYSTEM PROGRAMMING:10CS62

COs PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Learn architecture of UNIX O.S, understanding of Kernel and Shell.

1 2 1
UNIX system documentation
Apply Unix commands, piping, quoting, escaping and redirections to
solve a common problem and ability to use of the vi text editor to create 3 3 2
and modify files
Ability to use wild cards and formulate regular expressions for pattern
matching and grep,sed and awk to solve common problems and generate 1 1 3
report..
Create and demonstrate shell scripts using basic constructs and use shell
debugging mechanisms to improve shell program efficiency and detect 2 2 2
and correct errors
Java & J2EE: 10CS753

COs PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
CO1: Understand OOPs concepts, Java programming constructs and 1 3

JVM and byte codes
CO2:Able to write Simple java programs using Classes, Inheritance, 1 3
Exception handling and applets
CO3:Develop programs using thread concepts and swings 2 3
CO4:Develop simple Java applications with JDBC connective 1 3
CO5:Demonstrate the advanced J2EE concepts using Servelets, Java 1 3
RMI and EJB
64 | P a g e

INFORMATION AND NETWORK SECURITY: 10CS835

COs PSOs
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
CO1:Analyze the possible security attacks in complex real time systems 3 3 1

and their effective
counter measures
CO2:Identify the security issue in the network and resolve it 3 3 2
CO3:Explain and analyze the basic Cryptographic algorithm for 2 2 3
security
CO4:Evaluate security mechanism using rigorous approaches 1 1 3
3.1.3 Program level course-PO matrix
Courses PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
LOGIC 3 3 2 2 2
DESIGN:10CS33
Computer Organization: 2 3 2 2 2 2
10CS46
DATABASE 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS: 10CS54
UNIX SYSTEM 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 1
PROGRAMMING
:10CS62
Java & J2EE: 10CS753 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 1
INFORMATION AND 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2
NETWORK
SECURITY: 10CS835
65 | P a g e

3.1.3 Program level course-PSO matrix
Courses PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
LOGIC 3 2 1
DESIGN:10CS33
Computer 3 3 1
Organization:
10CS46
DATABASE 2 3
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS: 10CS54
UNIX SYSTEM 2 2 3
PROGRAMMING
:10CS62
Java & J2EE: 1 3

10CS753
INFORMATION 2 2 2
AND NETWORK
SECURITY:
10CS835
3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes
3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
Course Outcome is based
66 | P a g e

67 | P a g e

Direct Assessment methods are formative as well as summative
These rubrics can be used by students in, revising, and judging their own work and progress.
Assignments The assignment, Quiz and class test are a qualitative

performance assessment tool designed to assess students'
Quiz
knowledge of engineering practices, framework, and
Class test problem solving. An analytic rubric was developed to assess
students' knowledge with respect to the learning outcomes
associated with the scenario tool.
Group discussion/ This is designed to assess students analytical capacity along

Brainstorming with the capability to communicate with others.
Midterm exams Midterm and semester End examination are metric for
assessing whether all the POs are attained or not.
End semester exam (theory +
Examination is more focused on attainment of course
practical)
outcomes and program outcomes using a descriptive exam.
Lab practical This is mainly to assess students practical knowledge with

their designing capabilities.
Course Evaluation At the end of every semester, students give feedback for the
course taught to them. In this feedback survey students tell
how effective course was in order to achieve POs.
Indirect Assessment methods
Programme outcomes At the end of every academic year annual report is

assessment report developed where the statistics of students who have
participated in professional bodies/ student chapters
/workshops/seminars/conferences/paper presentations /
internships /industry visit etc. is prepared. This statement is
68 | P a g e

considered to indirectly assess the POs
Alumni Survey Collect variety of information about program satisfaction,

from graduates end. after every 2 years
Employer Survey Provide information about our graduates skills and

capability. after every 2 years
Student exit survey To evaluate the success of program in providing students

with opportunities to achieve the program outcome- every
year
CO Assessment Methodology and Tools (Direct Assessment)

CO Assessment Tool Assessment Who will do it Who will Review it
Frequency
End of course survey Semester end Faculty Department Quality
Assurance Cell
Rubrics (PO specific) As per need Faculty Department Quality
Assurance Cell
Faculty evaluation reports Semester end Faculty Department Quality

Assurance Cell
Internal assessment and Home Every 2 months Faculty Department Quality

assignments Assurance Cell
Semester end performance End of semester Faculty Department Quality

report Assurance Cell
Examinations End of semester Faculty Department Quality

Assurance Cell
Projects As per need Faculty Department Quality

Assurance Cell
Department performance report Annually HOD Department Quality

Assurance Cell
69 | P a g e

3.2.2 Record the attainment of course outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment
levels
The Course Outcomes attainment is measured through direct assessment through Internal Assessment
Attainment Level 1 :60% students scoring more than 60% marks
COS Attainment
CO1 59%
CO2 91%
CO3 91%
CO4 93%
Average 84%
Attainment Level 2 :70% students scoring more than 70% marks
COS Attainment
CO1 49%
CO2 71%
CO3 80%
CO4 87%
Average 72%
70 | P a g e

71 | P a g e

72 | P a g e

73 | P a g e

74 | P a g e

75 | P a g e

3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
76 | P a g e

3.3.1 Describe the assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the
program outcomes and program specific outcomes
PO Assessment Methodology and Tools (Indirect Assessment)
Events Assessment Assessment Tool Who will do Who will

Frequency it Review it
End of course survey Semester end Survey Faculty Department
Quality
Assurance Cell
Rubrics (PO specific) As per need Rubrics Faculty Department
Quality
Assurance Cell
Faculty evaluation Semester end Attainment of Faculty Department
reports Performance Quality
Indicators and Assurance Cell
77 | P a g e

evaluated against
student performance
Department Annually Report of analysis Department Department
performance report Quality
Assurance Cell
Exiting student Annually Interviews and focus Department Department
survey group discussion Quality
Assurance Cell
Alumni survey Annually Survey and Group Department Department
discussion Quality
Assurance Cell
Student Advisory 1-2 year Focus Group Faculty Department
Committee Discussions Quality
Assurance Cell
Employer Every 2 years Survey Department
Satisfaction Quality
Assurance Cell
PSO Assessment Methodology and Tools (Indirect Assessment)
Events Assessment Assessment Tool Who will do Who will

Frequency it Review it
End of course survey Semester end Survey Faculty Department
Quality
Assurance Cell
Department Annually Report of analysis Faculty Department
performance report Quality
Assurance Cell
Exiting student Annually Interviews and focus Department Department
survey group discussion Quality
Assurance Cell
78 | P a g e

Alumni survey Annually Survey and Group Department Department

discussion Quality
Assurance Cell
Student Advisory 1-2 year Focus Group Faculty Department
Committee Discussions Quality
Assurance Cell
Employer Every 2 years Survey Department
Satisfaction Quality
Assurance Cell
3.3.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO and PSO
Courses PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Electronic 3 2 2 2 2 1
Circuits:10cs32
Logic Design:10cs33 3 3 2 2 2
Discrete Mathematical 3 2 2 2 2
Structures:10cs34
Data Structures With 3 2 1

C:10cs35
Object Oriented 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1
Programmings With
C++: 10cs36
Data Structures With 2 2 3 2 2 2

C/C++ Lab: 10csl37
Electronic Circuits & 2 3 2 2 2

Logic Design
Laboratory: 10csl38
Graph Theory And 3 2 1 1 2 2

Combinatorics: 10cs42
Design And 2 3 3 2 1 1
79 | P a g e

Analysis Of Algorithms:
10cs43
Unix Shell 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 1
Programming: 10cs44
Microprocessor: 10cs45 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
Computer Organization: 2 3 2 2 2 2
10cs46
Design And Analysis Of 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1

Algorithms Laboratory:
10csl47
Microprocessors 3 3 3 2 2 2 2
Laboratory: 10csl48
Software Engineering: 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
10is51
System Software: 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2
10cs52
Operating Systems: 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
10cs53
Database Management 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
Systems: 10cs54
Computer Networks - I: 2 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2
10cs55
Formal Languages And 2 2 2

Automata Theory:
10cs56
Database Applications 2 3 2 2 1
Laboratory:10csl57
Ss & Os Lab: 10csl58 2 2 3 2 2 1
Management And 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2
Entrepreneurship:
80 | P a g e

10al61
Unix System 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 1
Programming:10cs62
Compiler Design: 1 1 1 1 2
10cs63
Computer Networks - Ii: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2

10cs64
Computer Graphics And 2 2 2 1 2

Visualization: 10cs65
1
Object Oriented 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Modeling And Design:
10cs71
Embedded Computing 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
Systems:10cs72
Programming The Web: 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 1

10cs73
Advanced Computer 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1
Architectures: 10cs74
Advanced DBMS 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10cs751
Digital Signal 3 2 2 1 1
Processing: 10cs752
Java & J2EE: 10CS753 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 1
Multimedia Computing: 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2
10cs754
Data Warehousing And 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1

Data Mining: 10cs755
Neural Networks: 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2
10cs756
81 | P a g e

Digital Image 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1
Processing: 10cs762
Game Theory: 10cs763 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Artificial Intelligence: 1 2 2 1 1 1
10cs764
Storage Area Networks: 1 1 1 1 1 2 1

10cs765
Networks Lab: 10csl77 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
Software Architectures: 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10is81
System Modeling & 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 2

Simulation: 10cs82
Web 2.0 And Rich 2 2 1 2 1 1 1

Internet Applications:
10cs832
Vlsi Design And 2 2 2 2 2 1

Algorithms: 10cs833
Network Management 3 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2
Systems: 10cs834
Information And 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2
Network Security:
10cs835
Microcontroller-Based 2 3 3 2 2 1
Systems: 10cs836
Adhoc Networks: 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
10cs841
Software Testing: 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
10cs842
Arm Based System 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Design: 10cs843
82 | P a g e

Services Oriented 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
Architecture: 10cs844
Clouds, Grids, And 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2

Clusters: 10cs845
Multi-Core Architecture 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2
And Programming:
10cs846
Direct Attainment
(80%)
1.60 1.64 1.63 1.26 1.30 1.14 1.10 1.02 1.17 1.36 1.17 1.13
Indirect Attainment 0.22 0.35 0.33 0.37 0.34 0.28 0.36 0.4 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.3
(20%)
83 | P a g e

CRITERIA 4
STUDENTS
PERFORMANCE
84 | P a g e

CRITERION Students Performance 150

4
4. STUDENTS PERFORMANCE
Item
(Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts with CAY CAYm1 CAYm2(2
(2015- (2014-18) 013-17)
explicit headings, wherever applicable) 19)
60 60 60
Sanctioned intake of the program (N)
56 37 41
Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of
students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of
students migrated to this program (N1)
NA 02 00
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via
lateral entry (N2)
3 3 3
Separate division students, if applicable (N3)
59 42 44
Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3)
Number of students who have successfully

graduated without backlogs in any
semester/year of study
N1 + N2 + N3
Year of (Without Backlog means no compartment
entry (As defined or failures in any semester/year of study)
above) I Year II Year III Year IV Year
56+0+3=59 - - - -
CAY(2015-19)
CAYm1(2014-18)
37+2+3=42 6
CAYm2(2013-17)
41+0+3=44 19 15 14 -
28+1+1=30 09 07 04 04 -
CAYm3
(LYG)(2012-16)
CAYm4
21+1+0=22 09 05 04 04
(LYGm1)(2011-15)
85 | P a g e

CAYm5
41+0+0=41 17 09 09 09
(LYGm2)(2010-14)
13 04 04 04
CAYm6(LYG
m3)(2009-10)
Number of students who have successfully

N1 + N2 + graduated
Year of entry
N3
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
(As defined
above)
56+0+3=59 - - - -
CAY(2015-19)
CAYm1(2014-18)
37+2+3=42 20 - - -
CAYm2(2013-17)
41+0+3=44 38 31 31
28+1+1=30 25 21 22 22
CAYm3 (LYG)(2012-16)
CAYm4 (LYGm1)(2011-15)
21+1+0=22 19 19 23 25
CAYm5 (LYGm2)(2010-14)
41+0+0=41 38 33 37 38
24 20 18 18
CAYm6(LYGm3)(2009
-10)
86 | P a g e

Enrolment Ratio
Ratio Marks
Year of entry
56/60=93.3% 20
CAY (2015-16)
38/60=63.3% 14
CAYm1(2014-15)
41/60=68.3% 14
CAYm2(2013-2014)
21/60=35% 0
CAYm3 (LYG) (2012-13)
CAYm4 (LYGm1)(2011- 21/60=35% 0

12)
14
CAYm5(LYGm2) (2010- 41/60=68.3%
11)
CAYm6(LYGm3)(2009- 25/60=41.6% 0
10)
Enrolment Ratio
Enrolment Ratio= N1/N
Item
(Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period Marks
of assessment)
>=90% students enrolled 20
Otherwise 0
87 | P a g e

Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program

Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study
SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/ (Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and
separate division, if applicable)
Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 Average SI
Latest Year of Latest Year of Latest Year of

Graduation, LYG
Item (CAYm3) Graduation minus 1, Graduation minus 2,
LYGm1 (CAYm4) LYGm2 (CAYm5)
2010-14
2011-15 2012-16
41 28 30
Number of students admitted in the corresponding
First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry
and separate division, if applicable
09 04 04
Number of students who have graduated without
backlogs in the stipulated period
0.219 0.0142 0.133

Success Index (SI)
0.164
Average SI
Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25*0.164=4.116
Success rate in stipulated period (15)
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the

stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number of students admitted
in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral
entry and separate division, if applicable)
88 | P a g e

Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three
batches Success rate = 15 Average SI
Item LYG (CAYm3) LYGm1(CAYm4) LYGm2(CAYm5)

(2010-14) (2011-15) (2012-16)
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year +

41 28 30
admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if
applicable
Number of students who have graduated in the

36 24 22
stipulated period
Success Index (SI)

0.878 0.857 0.
Average Success Index

0.823
Item LYG (CAYm3) LYGm1(CAYm4) LYGm2(CAYm5)
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year +

25 41 25+3
admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if
applicable
Number of students who have graduated in the

18 36 24
stipulated period
Success Index (SI)

18/25=0.72 36/41=0.878 24/28=0.857
Average Success Index

(0.72+0.878+0.857)/3=0.818
Success rate of students who successfully graduated= 15*0.823=12.35
Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 40 as
both
4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be applicable simultaneously.
89 | P a g e

Academic Performance in Third Year
Academic Performance = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10
point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Third
Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the
examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year.
Academic Performance CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
(2013-17) (2012-16) (2011-15)

6.63 6.25 6.60
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students (X)
34 22 23
Total no. of successful students (Y)
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z)

34 22 23
API = x* (Y/Z) 6.63 6.25 6.60
6.49
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3
Academic Performance=1.5*6.49=9.74
Academic Performance in Second Year (15)
Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point
scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10))
x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.

90 | P a g e
Academic Performance CAY CAYm1 CAYm2(

2012-16)
(2014-18) (2013-17)
5.98 5.81
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students (X)
Total no. of successful students (Y)

32 21
41 25
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z)
API = X* (Y/Z) AP 1 4.511 4.88
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3
Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship
Assessment Points = 40 average placement
2012 2011- 2010-11

Item -13 12
22 25 38
Total No. of Final Year Students (N)
3 9 13
No. of students placed in companies or Government
Sector (x) - 4 5
No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid
qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or National
Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)
0 0 0
No. of students turned entrepreneur in
engineering/technology (z)
3 13 18
x+y+z=
0.136 0.52 0.473
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N

0.376
Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3
Assessment Point=40*0.376=15.0533

91 | P a g e
Professional Activities (20)
Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5)
2013-14 NIL
2014-15 NIL
2015-16 NIL
2016-17 19/08/2016, Technical Talk by CSI
Student chapter. Guest name :
Mr.Venkat Reddy from Infosys
Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. (5)
(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of
the editors, publishers, etc.)
2013-14 NIL
2014-15 NEWSLETTER-15 published
2015-16 NEWSLETTER-16 published
Refer to Attachment

92 | P a g e
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study
Sl. Name of Year Event Organisation Awards

No the if any
Student
1 Mohan N 2012 Paper IIPM 1 Prize

Presentation(Dhristhi)
2 Akshay P 2012 Paper IIPM 2 Prize

V Presentation(Dhristhi)
2010- 3 Akshay P 2012 Add Buzz(Dhristhi) IIPM 2 Prize
V
2014 4 Akshay P
V
2012 Management
Game(Dhristhi)
IIPM 2 Prize
5 Raghu 2012 Statewide TATA -

Ram G.K Engineering IT Quiz Consultancy
Services
6 Akshay P 2012 Statewide TATA -

V Engineering IT Quiz Consultancy
Services
7 Nagadeep 2012 Statewide TATA -

K. V Engineering IT Quiz Consultancy
Services
8 Akshay P 2012 National Level iSecLABz in -

V Hacking association
Championship with E-Cell
IIT-
Kharagpur

93 | P a g e
9 Raghu 2012 National Level iSecLABz in

Ram G.K Hacking association
Championship with E-Cell
IIT-
Kharagpur

No the if any
Student
1 Gayathri 2012 Statewide TATA
2011- Engineering IT Quiz Consultancy

Services
2 Lokesh K 2012 Conference Bangalore

2015 S Cyber
Security
4 Vinayaka 2012 Conference Bangalore

AR Cyber
Security

No the if any
Student
1 Abhishek 2012 Management IIPM 1 Prize

M Game(Dhristhi)
2 Abhishek 2012 Quiz (Dhristhi) IIPM 1 Prize

M
2012- 3 Abhishek
M
2012 Add Buzz(Dhristhi) IIPM 1 Prize
2016 4 Abhishek
M
2012 Paper
Presentation(Agamya)
YDIT -
5 Abhishek 2012 Statewide TATA

M Engineering IT Quiz Consultancy

94 | P a g e
Services
6 Shalini D 2013 Anthakshari ACSCE 2 Prize

N
7 Shalini D 2014 Throw ball RRGI 2 Prize

N
8 Shalini D 2014 Certificate of VTU -

N Participation(VTU
inter college Athletic
Meet 2014-15)
9 Mubeena 2015 Workshop(App iOS

Taj Design Prototype) Finishing
School
Workshop
c/o VTU,
Nagarabhavi
10 Rajath 2016 Sponsored Projected KSCST

Kumar
(Android Application
to Track Gears Using
IoT)

95 | P a g e
CRITERIA 5
FACULTY
INFORMATION AND
CONTRIBUTIONS

96 | P a g e
CRITERION 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200
Academic year (2016-17)
S. Name of the Qualification Designati Date Distribution of teaching load (%) Academic Research Sponsor Cons Speci
No Faculty on of ed ultanc alizati
Member (All the Joinin Researc y and on
designatio g the h( Produ
Degree
(Startin
Universi
ty
Year of
Graduatio n since institu 1st UG PG Faculty Recieving
Ph.D during the
Ph.D
Guidanc
Research
Paper Funded ct
g from n joining the tion year Assessment Years e Publicatio Researc Devel
In Other
Highest institution ns h) opme
Program Progr
degree) ) nt
am
Univer
Phd sity of 1994 CSE
Dr. Kerala
IISc., Physi
T.R.Gopalak Mtec 29/10 100
1 Bangal 1979 Professor - 13 150 - - cal
rishna Nair h /2015 %
ore Engg.
Univer
Physi
sity of 1977
Msc cs
Kerala
Magad
h
Ph.D 2008 CSE
Univer
sity
Dr. B.S.
Mtec 01/07
2 Pradeep VTU 2005 Professor 100% 5 68 CSE
h /2016
Manga
lore
B.E 2001 CSE
Univer
sity
Anna
Univer
Ph.D
Dr. Senthil sity, 2014 NW
Asso. 01/08
3 Kumaran .T Chenn 100% 5 10
Prof. /2014
ai
Bharat
M.E 2001 CSE
hiar CSE Self Assessment Report 97 | P a g e
Univer
sity,
Coimb
atore
Bharat
hiar
Univer
B.E 1998 CSE
sity,
Coimb
atore
Vinaya
ka
Missio
ns Image
Ph.D Univer 2014 Proce
sity,sal ssing
em
Dr.C Asso. 23/07

4 100% 5 10
.S.Pillai satyab Prof. /2012
ama
univers
M.E 2005 CSE
ity,
Chenn
ai
madras
B.E Univer 2002 CSE
sity
Anna
CSE
Ph.D Univer 2016
sity
Annam
Dr. D. alai CSE
M.E 2007 Asso. 01/07
5 Sivakuma Univer 100% 6
Prof. /2016
r sity
Bharat
hiyar
BE 1999 EEE
Univer
sity
CSE Self Assessment Report 98 | P a g e

Sathya
bama CSE
Ph.D 2014
univers
ity
Dr. V Sathya 01/08 100
6 Prof. 30
Ramesh Mtec bama /2016 %
2008 CSE
h univers
ity
B.Tec N.B.K.
2003 IT
h R.I.S.T
Pursuin
VTU g
Ph.D Belgau (register WSN
Mrs. m ed
01/08
7 Kavita 2015) Asst. Prof 100% 3
/2011
K.Patil VTU
M.Te
Belgau 2008 CSE
ch
m
B.E GUG 2000 ECE
Pursuin
VTU g
m ed
2013) 23/07
Mrs. Jyoti
8 VTU Asst. Prof /2012 100% 4
Metan M.Te
Belgau 2009 CSE
ch
m
Pune
B.E Univer 2002 CSE
sity
Pursuin
VTU g
Mr. m ed 01/08
Mahantes
9 2015) Asst. Prof /2013 100% 3
h
VTU
Mathapati M.Te
Belgau 2010 CSE
ch
m
B.E VTU 2004 CSE

Belgau
m
Ph.D --- ---- ---
VTU,
M.Te I&CS
Belgau 2005
Mr. ch E
m 01/08
Panchaxar
Karnat
10 i Asst. Prof /2013 100% 1
Mamadap aka
ur Univer
B.E 2001 ECE
sity
Dharw
ad
Ph.D 26-
--- ---- ------
06-
VTU, 2009
M.Te
Belgau 2013 to 1- CSE
ch
m 08-
11 Mrs. Usha Asst.Prof 100% 1
2011
VTU, rejoin
B.E Belgau 2007 ed CSE
m 1-08-
2013
Ph.D ----- ----- ---
VTU,
M.Te 01/08 CSE
Mr.Shiva Belgau 2012
ch
12 Prasad K m Asst. Prof /2013 100% 1
H VTU,
CSE
B.E Belgau 2007
m
Pursuin
VTU g
Mrs. m ed 23/07
13 Sunita 2015) Asst. Prof /2014 100% 3
chalageri VTU
M.Te
Belgau 2005 CSE
ch
m
B.E GUG 1997 CSE
14 Mr. Ph.D --- ---- Asst. Prof 11/09 100 1 ----

Krishnaku Anna /2013 %
mar A Univer
M.Te
sity, 2013 CSE
ch
Chenn
ai.
Anna
Univer
B.E sity, 2006 CSE
Chenn
ai.
Ph.D --- ---- ------
Anna
Univer
M.E 2012 21/07 CSE
Mr. sity,Ch
15 S.Vinoth ennai Asst. Prof /2015 100% 2
Kumar Anna
Univer
B.E 2007 CSE
sity,Ch
ennai
Ph.D --- ---- -----
VTU
M.Te
Mr. Belgau 2010 CSE
ch Asst. Prof 01/08
16 Chandrase m 100%
/2016
kar V VTU
B.E Belgau 2007 ISE
m
Ph.D --- ---- ---
M.Te
Mr. Hari VTU 2010 CSE
ch Asst. Prof 06/08
17 Prasad K 100%
Belgau /2016
S
B.E m 2007 CSE

Academic Year (2015-16)
S. Name of the Qualification Designa Date of Distribution of Academic Research Spons Consulta Specializ
No Faculty tion Joining teaching load (%) ored ncy and ation
Member Degre University Year of (All the the 1st UG PG Faculty Ph.D Researc Resear Product
e Graduatio designat institutio Recievi Guida h Paper ch( Develop
yea
(Starti n ng nce Publicat
ng ion n r In Ot Ph.D ions Funde ment
from since Pr her during d
Highe joining o Pro the Resear
st gr gra Assess
the a m
ch)
degree ment
) instituti m Years
on)
University
Dr. Phd 1994 CSE
of Kerala 1
T.R.Gopalak Mtec IISc., Profess 29/10/20 0 Physical
1 1979 - 150 -
rishna Nair h Bangalore or 15 0 Engg.
University %
1977 Physics
Msc of Kerala
Anna
Ph.D
University, 2014 NW
Chennai
Dr. Senthil Bharathiar
Asso. 01/08/20 100
2 Kumaran .T M.E University, 2001 5 10 CSE
Prof. 14 %
Coimbatore
Bharathiar
B.E University, 1998 CSE
Coimbatore
Vinayaka
1 Image
Missions
Dr.C Ph.D 2014 Asso. 23/07/20 0 Processin
3 University, 5 10
.S.Pillai Prof. 12 0 g
salem
%
M.E satyabama 2005 CSE

university,
Chennai
Madras
B.E 2002 CSE
University
(register
PhD VTU N/W
ed
2013) 1
Dr. M G R Asso. 12/09/2 0
4 Mrs. Selvi M.T 1
University, 2007 Pro 011 0 CSE
ech
Chennai %
Anna
BE University, 2004 CSE
Chennai.
Rayalase
PhD ema Pursuin ----
university g
Dr. M G
Mr. S. R
M.T Asso. 12/09/20 100 CSE
5 Vijayanad Universit 2008
ech Prof. 09 %
y,
Chennai
Madras
CSE
BE Universit 2004
y
Mrs. PhD --- - -----
Lavanya Dr. M G R
MTe
University, 2006 Asst. 12/09/20 10 CSE
6 Balachandra ch
Chennai Prof 09 0%
n Madras
BE 2004 ECE
University
PhD ------ --- ----
Dr. M G
Mr. R 1
MTe
Kumaraku Universit 2011 Asst. 02/02/2 0 CS
7 ch
rban y, Prof 015 0
Chennai %
Kamaraja
BsC 2004 CS&IT
r

Universit
y
Pursuin
g
VTU
Ph.D (register 1 WSN
Mrs. Belgaum 01/08/20
ed Asst. 0
8 Kavita 11 1
2015) Prof 0
K.Patil
M.T VTU %
2008 CSE
ech Belgaum
B.E GUG 2000 CSE
Pursuin
g
VTU
Ph.D (register WSN
Belgaum 1
ed 23/07/20
Mrs. Jyoti Asst. 0
9 2013) 12 4
Metan Prof 0
M.T VTU
2009 % CSE
ech Belgaum
Pune
B.E 2002 CSE
University
Pursuin
g
VTU
Ph.D (register WSN
Mr. Belgaum 1
ed 01/08/20
Mahantes Asst. 0
10 2015) 13 2
h Prof 0
M.T VTU
Mathapati 2010 % CSE
ech Belgaum
VTU
B.E 2004 CSE
Belgaum
Ph.D --- ---- ----
Mr.
M.T VTU,Belga 01/08/20 1
Panchaxar 2005 CSE
ech um Asst. 0
11 i 13 2
Karnataka Prof 0
Mamadap
ur B.E University 2001 % CSE
Dharwad
Ph.D
--- ---- 1 ----
01/08/20
Asst. 0
12 Mrs. Usha M.T VTU,Belga 13 2
2013 Prof 0 CSE
ech um
%
B.E VTU,Belga 2007 CSE

um
Ph.D ----
01/08/20 1
Mr.Shiva M.T VTU,Belga
2012 Asst. 0 CSE
13 Prasad K ech um 13 2
Prof 0
H VTU,Belga
B.E 2007 % CSE
um
Pursuin
g
VTU
Ph.D (register 1 WSN
Mrs. Belgaum 23/07/20
ed Asst. 0
14 Sunita 14 2
2015) Prof 0
chalageri
M.T VTU %
2005 CSE
ech Belgaum
B.E GUG 1997 CSE
Ph.D --- ---- ----
Anna
Mr. M.E University, 2013 11/09/20 SE
Asst. 100
15 Krishnaku Chennai. 13 2
Prof %
mar A Anna
Chennai.
Pursuin
St. Peter g
Data
Ph.D University, (register
mining
Chennai ed
02/02/20
Mr. E. 2013) Asst. 10
16 15 2
Prasanna Anna Prof 0%
M.E University, 2012 CSE
Chennai
Madras
B.E 2004 CSE
University
Ph.D --- ---- ----
Anna
21/07/20 1
Mr. M.E University, 2012 CSE
Asst. 0
17 S.Vinoth Chennai 15 2
Prof 0
Kumar Anna
%
Chennai

Academic Year (2014-15)
Name of the Qualification Designa Date of Distribution of Academic Research Spons Consulta Specializ
Faculty tion Joining teaching load (%) ored ncy and ation
Member (All the the Resear Product
designat institutio ch( Develop
ion n Funde ment
S. Degree University Year of since 1st UG P Faculty Ph.D Resear d
(Starting Graduatio joining Recievi Guidan ch Resear
No ye G
from n ng ce Paper
Highest the ar In Other Ph.D Publica ch)
degree) instituti Pro Progr during tions
on) gra am the
m Assess
ment
Years
Phd JNTU 2010 CSE
Manipal
MIT Academ 2003 IT
Profess 01/11/20 10
1 Dr.Selvarani y 0% - 1 38
or 13
GCT
BE Coimbat 1991 ECE
ore
Anna
Ph.D Universi
2014 NW
ty,
Chennai
Bharathi 01/08/20 10
Dr. . Senthil ar Asso.
2 14 0 - 9
Kumaran .T Universi Prof.
M.E 2001 % CSE
ty,
Coimbat
ore
Bharathi
B.E 1998 CSE
ar

Universi
ty,
Coimbat
ore
Vinayak
a
Mission
Image
s
Ph.D 2014 Processin
Universi
g
ty,salem
10
Dr.C Asso. 23/07/20
3 0 9
.S.Pillai satyaba Prof. 12
%
ma
M.E universit 2005 CSE
y,
Chennai
Madras
B.E Universi 2002 CSE
ty
Madras
Universi
M.E 2002 CSE
Mr. Sivaram ty 10
Asso.Pr 01/08/20
4 Vishnu 0
of 14
Kumar Madras %
Universi
B.E 1998 ECE
ty
(register
PhD VTU N/W
ed
2013) 10
Asso. 12/09/2
5 Mrs. Selvi Dr. M G 0 1
Pro 011
R %
M.Tech Universi 2007 CSE
ty,
Chennai

Anna
Universi
BE ty, 2004 CSE
Chennai
.
Rayal
aseem
PhD a Pursuin ----
univer g
sity
Dr. M
Mr. S. GR 10
Asso. 12/09/20
6 Vijayanad Unive 0
M.Tech 2008 Prof. 09 CSE
rsity, %
Chen
nai
Madr
as
BE 2004 CSE
Unive
rsity
PhD --- - -----
Dr. M G
Mrs. R
Lavanya MTech Universi 2006 10 CSE
Asst. 12/09/20
7 Balachandra ty, 0
Prof 09
n Chennai %
Madras
BE Universi 2004 ECE
ty
PhD ------ --- ----
Dr. M G
Mr. R
Kumaraku MTech Universi 2011 CS
10
rban ty, Asst. 02/02/2
8 0
Mr. Chennai Prof 015 %
Kumaraku Kamaraj
rban ar
BsC 2004 CS&IT
Universi
ty

Ph.D -- -- ---
Mrs. VTU 01/08/20 10
Asst.
9 Kavita M.Tech Belgau 2008 11 0 2 CSE
Prof
K.Patil m %
B.E GUG 2000 CSE
Pursuin
VTU g
m ed
2013) 23/07/20 10
Mrs. Jyoti Asst. Asst.
10 VTU 12 0 2
Metan Prof Prof
M.Tech Belgau 2009 % CSE
m
Pune
ty
Ph.D -- -- ---
VTU
Mr. 01/08/20
M.Tech Belgau 2010 10 CSE
Mahantes Asst.
11 m 13 0
h Prof
VTU %
Mathapati
B.E Belgau 2004 CSE
m
Ph.D --- ---- ----
VTU,Be
M.Tech 2005 CSE
Mr. lgaum
Panchaxar Karnata 01/08/20 10
Asst.
12 i ka 13 0
Prof
Mamadap Universi %
ur B.E 2001 CSE
ty
Dharwa
d
Ph.D
--- ---- ----
01/08/20 10
VTU,Be Asst.
13 Mrs. Usha M.Tech 2013 13 0 1 CSE
lgaum Prof
%
VTU,Be
B.E 2007 CSE
lgaum
14 Mr.Shiva Ph.D Asst. 01/08/20 10 - ----

Prasad K VTU,Be Prof 13 0
M.Tech 2012 CSE
H lgaum %
VTU,Be
B.E 2007 CSE
lgaum
Ph.D -- -- ---
Mrs. VTU 23/07/20 10
Asst.
15 Sunita M.Tech Belgau 2005 14 0 1 CSE
Prof
chalageri m %
B.E GUG 1997 CSE
Ph.D --- ---- ----
Anna
Universi
M.E ty, 2013 SE
Mr. Chennai 11/09/20 10
Asst.
16 Krishnaku . 13 0 1
Prof
mar A Anna %
Universi
B.E ty, 2006 CSE
Chennai
.
Pursuin
St. Peter
g
Universi Data
Ph.D (register
ty, mining
ed
Chennai
2013)
02/02/20 10
Mr. E. Anna Asst.
17 15 0 -
Prasanna Universi Prof
M.E 2012 % CSE
ty,Chen
nai
Madras
ty

Academic year (2013-14)
S. Name of the Qualification Designa Date of Distribution of Academic Research Spons Consulta Specializ
No Faculty tion Joining teaching load (%) ored ncy and ation
Member (All the the Resear Product
designat institutio ch( Develop
ion n Funde ment
Degree University Year of since 1st UG P Faculty Ph.D Resear d
(Starting Graduatio joining Recievi Guidan ch Resear
ye G
from n ng ce Paper
Highest the ar Ph.D Publica ch)
degree) instituti during tions
on) the
In Othe Assess
Prog r ment
ram Prog Years
ram
Phd JNTU CSE
Manipal
MIT Academ 2003 IT
Profess 01/11/20 100
1 Dr.Selvarani y - 1 38
or 13 %
GCT
BE Coimbat 1991 ECE
ore
Vinayak
a
Pursuin Image
Mission
Mr. Ph.D g Asso. 23/07/20 100 Processin
2 s 9
C.S.Pillai Prof. 12 % g
Universi
ty,salem
M.E satyaba 2005 CSE

ma
universit
y,
Chennai
Madras
ty
PhD VTU N/W
Dr. M G
R
M.Tech Universi M.Tech CSE
ty, Asso. 12/09/20 100
3 Mrs. Selvi 1
Chennai Pro 11 %
Anna
Universi
BE BE CSE
ty,
Chennai
Rayal
aseem
PhD a Pursuin ----
univer g
sity
Dr. M
GR
Mr.Vijayana Asso. 12/09/20 100
4 Unive
nd M.Tech 2008 Prof. 09 % CSE
rsity,
Chen
nai
Madr
as
BE 2004 CSE
Unive
rsity
PhD --- PhD -----
Mrs. Dr. M G
Lavanya R
Asst. 12/09/20 50 50
5 Balachandra MTech Universi MTech CSE
Prof 09 % %
n ty,
Chennai
BE Madras BE ECE

Universi
ty
Ph.D -- -- --
VTU 01/08/20
Mrs. Kavita Asst. 100
6 M.Tech Belgau 2008 11 CSE
K.Patil Prof %
m
B.E GUG 2000 CSE
Pursuin
VTU g
m ed
2013) 23/07/20
Mrs. Jyoti Asst. 100
7 VTU 12 1
Metan Prof %
M.Tech Belgau 2009 CSE
m
Pune
ty
Ph.D --- --- --
VTU
Mr. M.Tech Belgau 2010 01/08/20 CSE
Asst. 100
8 Mahantesh m 13 2
Prof %
Mathapati VTU
B.E Belgau 2004 CSE
m
Ph.D --- ---- ----
VTU,Be
M.Tech 2005 CSE
lgaum
Mr. Karnata 01/08/20
Asst. 100
9 Panchaxari ka 13
Prof %
Mamadapur Universi
B.E 2001 CSE
ty
Dharwa
d
Ph.D
--- ---- ----
01/08/20
Asst. 100
10 Mrs. Usha VTU,Be 13
M.Tech 2013 Prof % CSE
lgaum
B.E VTU,Be 2007 CSE

lgaum
Ph.D ----
VTU,Be 01/08/20
Mr. Shiva M.Tech 2012 Asst. 100 CSE
11 lgaum 13 -
Prasad Prof %
VTU,Be
B.E 2007 CSE
lgaum
Ph.D --- ---- ----
Anna
Universi
M.E ty, 2013 SE
Chennai 11/09/20
Mr.Krishna Asst. 50 50
12 . 13 1
Kumar Prof % %
Anna
Universi
B.E ty, 2006 CSE
Chennai
.
Note: Please provide cumulative information for all the shifts for three assessment years in above format in Annexure II.
5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)
S:F ratio = N/F; N=No. of students= 3x where x is (approved intake + 20% lateral entry intake+ separate
division, if any)
F = No. of faculty = (a + b c) for every assessment year
a: Total number of full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of the this program
b: Total number of full-time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) serving this program from
other Program(s)
c: Total number of full time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) of this program serving
other program(s)

Regular Faculty means:
Full time on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period of not less than two years
AND drawing consolidated salary not less than applicable gross salary shall only be counted as a regular
employee.
Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the AICTE/Central Government and implementation as
prescribed by the State Government. In case State Government prescribes lesser consolidated salary for a
particular cadre then same will be considered as reference while counting faculty as a regular faculty.
Year x N F SFR=N/F
3x72 216 12 18
CAY
2015-16
3x72 216 12 18
CAYm1
2014-15
3x72 216 12 18
CAYm2
2013-14
Average SFR for three assessment years 18
Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR between 15:1 to 20:1,
and zero for average SFR higher than 20:1.
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)

F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio
based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty
ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1 Student-Faculty
ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors

Year
Required Available Required Available Required Available
F1 F2 F3
CAY-2015-16 1 1 3 2 8 9
CAYm1-2014-15 1 1 3 3 8 8
CAYm2-2013-14 1 1 3 3 8 8
Average
RF1=1 AF1=1 RF2=3 AF2=2.33 RF3=8 AF3=8.3
Numbers CadreRatio Mark
=((AF1/RF1)+((AF2/RF2)*0.6)+((AF3/RF3)*0.4)*12.5
=(1/1)+(2.3/3*0.6)+(8.3/8*0.4)*12.5
=24

5.3. Faculty Qualification
FQ =2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty with
M.Tech., F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:15 Faculty Student ratio (no. of faculty and no. of
students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
X Y F FQ=2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)]

CAY(2015-16) 2 10 12 16.67
CAYm1(2014- 2 10 12 16.67
15)
CAYm2(2013- 1 11 12 15.83
14)
16.39
Average Assessment
5.4. Faculty Retention

No. of regular faculty members in CAYm2(2013-14)=12 CAYm1(2014-15)=17 CAY(2015-16)=17
CAY(2015-16) CAYm1(2014-15) CAYm2(2013-

Item Marks 14)
>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the 25 25 25

period of assessment 25
keeping CAYm2 as base year

>=75% of required Faculty members retained during the



<50% of required Faculty members retained during the

Retained %
CAY(2015-16) 11 92%
CAYm1(2014-15) 12 100%
CAYm2(2013-14) 12 100%
Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning

(Odd Semester 2016-17)
S.no Date Event Event Title Expert
Mr. Venkata Reddy P S
Technical
1 19-08-2016 Web Mining Technology Lead,
Talk
Infosys, Bangalore

(Even Semester 2015-16)

1 21.4. 2016 National Signal Processing Computing, Mr.H.N.Nandi Dharma Kishore
Conference Networks and Power Engineering
(SPCN16)
2 31-03-2016 Workshop Role Of Industry & Institute 1. Dr. Seetharamu S, Director (Retd.),
Interaction Central Power Research Institute
(Ministry of Power, GoI)
2. Dr. Shanmukha N, Professor, R.V.
College of Engineering
3 08-03-2016 Memorandum Mr. Basavaraj Biradar
MOU
of Understanding Eduwize, Bangalore
4 Technical Mr. Shivaprakash B Chalageri
05-03-2016 ERP and its benefits
Seminar HP IT,
5 04-03-2016 Guest lecture Cloud computing Dr.Mohan
Prof & H.O.D
ISE,SJBIT Bangalore
6 03-03-2016 Seminar Higher studies in abroad/training Mr. Mayank RM
Visu Academy Ltd
7 03-02-2016 Guest Lecture DotNet Programming Mr.Md.Ismail,

Software Developer,
and Technology, Mangamana Palya Main Road,
Bommanahalli,
Bagalore-560068.
8 11.01.2016 Workshop Basics of Computer & Ms-office Dept.of CSE Staff Members
& (Hardware/Internet/Word/Excel/
12.01.2016 PowerPoint)


1 05.11.2015 Department Department of CSE
Association RACE
Inauguration
2 05.11.2015 Releasing Of Department of CSE
News Letter
News Letter
3 Mr. Bharath Kumar
Guest Head-Technical
05.11.2015 Trends in it-Ims and Career Path
Lecturer Operation.
CMS-IT Services (Pvt. Ltd) ,Bangalore.
4 CMS-IT
05.11.2015 MOU
Services (Pvt. Ltd) Bangalore
5 15.10.2015 Intelligent Systems a Dr.T.R.Gopalakrishnan Nair M.Tech.,Ph.D.
Guest Lecture Transformation in Engineering Former Seniour Scientist(ISRO)/Former Vice
Approach President Research
6 06.10.2015 1. Mr.Sreenivasa
Ramanujam,
Industrial Expectation From Young TCS, Bangalore
Guest Lecture
Engineers 2. Mr.Gopal Singh
Rajput,
TCS, Bangalore
7 Department of CSE
29.08.2015 Symposium Praxis2k15


1 21-05-2015 Mr. Adarsh K Babu
Industrial Tcs Projects And Software
TCS SJM Towers, Anand Rao Circle,sheshadri
Visit Development
Road, Bangalore
2 20-04-2015 Mr.Rohith
Workshop Microsoft Tools
Edu_kinect Hyderabad
3 One Day Ethical Hacking And Cyber Eikon Technologies
13-04-2015
Workshop Security Bangalore
4 Department Of CSE
31-03-2015 Conference Networking And Other Topic ACSCE
5 30-03-2015 Europe Study Centre Ltd.

Seminar Higher Studies In Europe
6 17-03-2015 Mayank
Seminar Higher Studies In Abroad/Training RM
Gensoft IT India
7 Devanad Prasad V, Md
16-03-2015 Seminar Software Engineering And Testing Gensoft It India
8 Mr. Pradeep Kumar

09-03-2015 Seminar Java Software Engineering
Big Perl Solution
9 Devanad Prasad V, Md
27-02-2015 Seminar Software Testing Gensoft It India


1 20-09-2014 Mr. Prasanna Elumalai,
SDLC With Web Designing
Seminar Team Leader, In-Solution Global Pvt. Ltd.,
Bangalore

1 28.04.2014 to Workshop Web Design Training Mr.R.Sridhar and Mr.Kiran
29.04.2014
2 Building Mobile Application Mr.Arafath Abobacker,
24.04.2014 Technical Talk
using Android Framework NIIT,
3 07.04.2014 Mr.Karthik,
To Workshop NSDC Programme Data Grid Technology
11.04.2014
4 Mr.Prasanth Nambiar, SPAN , Infotech.
29.03.2014 Technical Talk Indian Industry & Technology

1 1.10.2013 Mr.Raghavendra,
Workshop Android Development
Kaiten Software

2 Mr.Srinidhi Srinivas,
25.09.2013 Technical Talk Cyber Crime and Ethical Hacking
VP Digital Forensic and Training
3 31.08.2013 Technical Talk Object Thinking and Mr.Venkat Reddy P.S.,
Programming Infosys
4 29.03.2014 Technical Talk Indian Industry & Technology Mr.Prasanth Nambiar, SPAN , Infotech.
5 21.08.2013 Technical Talk Cyber Crime and Malwares Dr.Nandi Dharma Kishore
(Reaserch Scientist II)
McAfee
6 14.08.2013 Workshop Skill and Tips in Programming K.Ravindra,
Domain Ekalavaya Universities
5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs
A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 Points
Participation>5 days Faculty development program: 5 points
Name of the Faculty Max. 5 per Faculty
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Dr.C.S.Pillai 5 3 -
Dr. . Senthil Kumaran.T 5 3 -
Mrs. Kavita K.Patil 5 5 -
Mrs. Jyoti Metan 5 5 -

Mr. Mahantesh Mathapati 5 5 -

Mr. Panchaxari Mamadapur 5 5 -
Mrs. Usha 5 5 -
Mr. Shiva Prasad K H 5 5 -
Mrs. Sunita chalageri 5 3 -
Mr. Krishnakumar A 5 3 -
Mr. S.Vinoth Kumar 5 0 -
Sum 55 42 0
12 12 12
RF= Number of Faculty
required to comply
Asssessment=(3 X(Sum/0.5*RF) 27.5 21 0 5.7.
with 15:1 Student-Faculty ratio Resear
as per 5.1 ch and
Develo
Average assessment over three years (Marks limited to 15) 16.17
pment
5.7.1.
Acade
mic Research
Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving Ph.D. during the
assessment period.
Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6)
Sl.No Name of Faculty No of Publication

1. Dr. B. S. Pradeep 68
2. Dr. T.R.Gopalakrishna Nair 150
3. Dr. R Selvarani 39
4. Dr. Senthil Kumaran .T 12
5. Dr.C. .S.Pillai 10

6. Dr. D. Sivakumar 06
7. Dr. Ramesh 30
8. Mrs. Kavita K Patil 03
9. Mrs. Jyothi Metan 05
10. Mr. Mahantesh Mathapati 05
11. Mr. Panchaxari Mamadapur 02
12. Mrs. Usha 02
13. Mr.Shiva Prasad K H 02
14. Mrs. Sunita chalageri 03
15. Mr. Krishna Kumar 02
16. Mr. E. Prasanna 03
17. Mr. S Vinod Kumar 02
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)
All relevant details shall be mentioned.
S.No Name Department VTU Other University Total no. of

Candidates
No. of No. of No. of No. of Registered Awarded
Candidates Ph. D Candidates Ph. D
Registered awarded Registered awarded
1 TR Gopalakrishnan 07 06 Nil NIL 13 06
Nair
2 Dr. Pradeep CSE 02 NIL 03 NIL 05 NIL
3 Dr.T.Senthil CSE 03 NIL 02 NIL 05 NIL
Kumaran
4 Dr.C.S.Pillai CSE 02 NIL NIL NIL 02 NIL
5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)

Funded research: NIL

(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years): Amount > 20 Lacs 5 Marks
Amount >= 16 Lacs and <= 20 lacs 4 Marks Amount >= 12 Lacs and 16 lacs 3 Marks Amount >= 8 Lacs and < 12 lacs 2
Marks Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 8 lacs 1 Mark Amount < 4 Lacs 0 Mark
Sl. Name of the Teacher / Project Title Year of Funding Agency Total Amount
No. Principal Investigator Sanction Sanctioned
1 Mrs. USHA .M & Android Karnataka State Council for 3,000
DR.T.SENTHILKUMARAN Application To Track 2016 Science and Technology(KSCST)
Gears Using Internet Approval-2016
Of Things (IOT)
5.7.3. Development activities (10)
Product Development:
Research laboratories:
S.No Licensed Software Description

1 Microsoft e- Licensed
2 Window Server
3 MS Office
4 SQL Server
5 Windows XP
6 Linux ,NS2
7 Ardino Board
8 Mat Lab
Instructional materials

S.No Details
1 Smart Class(Multimedia Projector)
2 Lab Manual
3 NPTEL videos
4 Assignments
5 PPT
Working models/charts/monograms etc.
S.No Details
1. Animations
2. Lab Description Charts
3. Lab Manuals
5.7.4. Consultancy (from Industry) (5)

CMS IT Eduwize,Blr Data Grid Technologies PVT.
5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System

(FPADS) (30) :


5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)
S.No Name of the Visiting Faculty

1 Mr. Chandrasekar V
2 Mr. Hari Prasad

CRITERIA 6
FACILITIES AND
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT

6. Facilities and Technical Support
6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories and technical man power (30)
Sl. Lab Name of Number Name of the Weekly Technical man power support
No No the of important utilization Name of the Designation Qualification
technical staff
Laboratory students equipment status
per (All the
setup courses
(batch for which
size) the lab is
utilized)
SS&OS Lab Computer

(Odd sem) Systems with
1 Lab1 20 required 9 hours Chandana Instructor B.E
Softwares ,
Project Lab with
(Even Sem) additional 10
Systems
NW/ Computer
M.TechI Systems with
2 Lab2 Sem Lab 20 required 12 hours Shivukumar Instructor B.E
(Odd Sem) Softwares ,
with
additional 10
USP Lab/ Systems
M.Tech II
Sem Lab
(Even Sem)
DBMS Lab Computer

(odd sem) Systems with
20 required 3 hours Ankita Instructor B.E
3 Lab3 Softwares.
MP Lab
(Even Sem)

DS Lab
(odd sem) Computer
4 Lab4 22 Systems with 3 hours Ramesh Instructor B.Sc
CG Lab required Babu
(Even Sem) Softwares
WP Lab
(Odd Sem) Computer
22 Systems with 3 hours Kavya Programm M.Tech
5 Lab5 required er
DAA Lab Softwares
(Even Sem)
Computer
6 Lab6 R&D Lab 3 Systems with 15 hours Janardhan Instructor B.Sc
required
Softwares
Computer
7 Lab7 CPL 30 Systems with 27 hours Rajalakshmi Instructor B.Sc
(B.E required
I/II Softwares
Sem)
8 Lab8 Language 30 Computer

Lab Systems with 27 hours Janardhan Instructor B.Sc
required
Softwares
CRO, Power
supply ,
9 ADE Lab 22 Signal 3 hours Shivakumar Instructor B.E
generator,
Trainer kit
ICs
Transistors

6.2 Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in
laboratories(25)
Sl. Facility Details Reasons for Utilizations Areas in which Relevance

no Name creating students are to
facility expected to have Pos/PSOs
enhanced
learning
1 Computer Using Scrap To provide 5 hours per Real time PO1,
Peripheral /Unused complete week experience of PO4,
Assembly computers picture of dissembling, PO7,
Lab hardware locating the
devices for devices,
better assembling the
understanding system
of the subjects
2 Smart class Fully equipped To enhancing Per Better
facility shared Smart Teaching Semester understanding PO5,
Class room with Learning 15 hours PO10,
LCD projector P12
and software's
with the seating
capacity of 80.
Comfortable
desks, chairs and
teaching aids.
Glass board,
Fan, Tube light,
chalk board
3 E-journal IEEE, For research Complete Research activity, PO1,

Facility IGate, and project semester is Recent trends in PO2,
Springer, activities. To opened to engineering, PO3,
know about utilize PO5,
Project activity
recent trends in P12
science and
technology
4 Common Ethernet/WiFi Facility to staff Complete More knowledge PO1,
Internet and students semester is apart from PO3,
Facility for enhancing opened to curriculum, PO4,
Teaching utilize 247 access to PO5,
Learning , learning resorces P12

5 MAT Lab Control system , In addition Complete Modeling PO2,

Facility Simulink to the VTU semester is the equation PO3,
curriculum, opened to for the PO4,
students can utilize Design
verify engineering
theoretical problems
concepts in .
a practical
environment
It is helpful for
the analysis of
problems
6 Dept. Having collection To meet the Complete Students and staff PO1,
Library ofText Books, needs of the semester is can refer text PO2,
Reference Books , students, opened to book and have a PO12
Journals,Project / To provide utilize better
seminar report. reference understanding ,
facilities, preparing notes,
To refer
advanced
information for
seminar,
laboratory,
projects,
To know about
the past
research
activities
undertaken by
the students

6.3 Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambience (10)
Maintenance of Laboratory Equipments
1. Regular checkup of equipment is carried out at the end of every semester.
2. Breakdown register is maintained in the laboratories.
3. As per the requirement minor repairs are carried out by the lab technical staff
4. Major repairs are outsourced by following the procedure of the institute.
Overall Ambience
1. Department has enough labs which are used for all the years on timetable basis to meet the
curriculum requirements
2. The courses which have practical work will be provided labs every week.
3. Conditions of chairs/benches are in good condition. Chairs are provided for individual
students in Labs.
4. Labs are equipped with sufficient hardware and licensed software to run program specific
curriculum and off program curriculum.
5. Sufficient laboratory manual are distributed to students.
6. Sufficient number of windows is available for ventilation and natural light and every lab has
one exit.
7. Lighting system is very effective, along with the natural light in every corner of the rooms.
8. Emergency light connections available in Lab in case of power failure.
9. Cup-boards are available in each lab for students to place their belongings.
10. Each Lab is equipped with white/black board, computer, Internet, and such other amenities.
11. Research laboratory is available 24X7 for all faculties and students to carry research work

6.4 Project Laboratory (5)
S.N Name of the Facilities Utilization

o.
Turbo C 3.0, 6th semester students Computer
1.
Graphics Lab, PG students, Research
th
2. Fedora , 7scholars and Faculty
, 8th semester members.
students, PG students,
Red Hat Linux Research scholars and Faculty
3. Java SE Development Kit members.
7th, 8th semester students, PG students,
Microsoft Visual Studio , Research scholars and Faculty
members.
4. My Eclipse, Net beans IDE 7th, 8th semester students, PG students,

Research scholars and Faculty
5. Apache Tomcat 7th, 8th semester students, PG students,
members,
Research scholars and Faculty
6. Microsoft Office professional , 6th ,7th, 8th semester students, PG
Adobe Reader students, Research scholars and
Faculty
7 My Sql, 6th ,7th, 8th semester students, PG
students, Research scholars and
Faculty

6.5 Safety measures in laboratories (10)
Sl.No Name of the Safety Measures

Laboratory
1 Lab1 General Rules of Conduct in Laboratories are displayed.

Specific Safety Rules for students displayed.
SS&OS/
Project First aid box, Fire extinguisher are kept in the laboratory.
Lab
Well trained technical supporting staff.
Avoiding the use of damaged equipments and provides
needful equipments and components.
Periodical servicing of the lab equipments.
Maintain a clean and organized laboratory,
Avoiding the use of cell phones.
Appropriate storage areas.
2 Lab 2 General Rules of Conduct in Laboratories are displayed.

Specific Safety Rules for students displayed.
NW/USP/
M Tech First aid box, Fire extinguisher are kept in the laboratory.
Lab
Appropriate storage areas

General Rules of Conduct in Laboratories are displayed.
3 Lab 3 Specific Safety Rules for students displayed.

First aid box, Fire extinguisher are kept in the laboratory.
DBMS/MP
Lab Well trained technical supporting staff.

DS/CG

WP/DAA



R & D Lab

Computer
Programming Well trained technical supporting staff.
Lab

Language Laboratory



CRITERIA 7
CONTINUOUS
IMPROVEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

NEW FORMAT OF SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)
Criterion 7 Continuous Improvement 50
7. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20)
POs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2015-16) CAY
POs Target Attainment Observations

level level
PO1:Statement as mentioned in Annexure I
PO1 79.43% 85.64% Attainment is improved in the following subjects
10CS35,10CS45,10CS32
Observations :
1.Atainement level still it is 85% we need to improve
2. Students are not exposed to basic of data structures
concepts(10CS35)
3. Students find it difficult to solve assembly language
programming(10CS45)
4. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well understood(10CS45)
5. Solving dynamic problem found to be difficult(10CS35)
6.solving problems found to be difficult(10CS32)
Actions
1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts (10CS35)
2. More assembly level programming to be taught in tutorial classes(1010CS45)
3. Practical approach of teaching programming to be adapted.(10CS35)
4. More problems will be given for practice(10CS35,10CS45,10CS32)
PO2 80% 85.27% Attainment can be improved in the following subjects
10CS35,10CS45,10CS32,10CS56
Observations :
2. Students are not exposed to basic of data structures
concepts(10CS35)
3. Students find it difficult to solve assembly language
programming(10CS45)
6.solving problems found to be difficult(10CS32)

Actions
PO3 81.78% 75.72% Attainment is low in the following subjects
10CS45,10CS32,10CS56
Observations :
2 Students find it difficult to solve assembly language
programming(10CS45)
6.solving problems found to be difficult in automata(10CS56)
Actions
PO4 69% 55.78% Attainment is low in the following subjects
10CS35,10CS45,10CS32,10CS56,
Observations :
2 Students find it difficult to solve assembly language
programming(10CS45)
6.solving problems found to be difficult in automata(10CS56)
7. Students find it difficult to solve Turing machine concepts &
PDA(10CS56)
Actions
10CS35, 10CS45, 10CS32.
Observations :

2. Solving dynamic problem and greedy techniques found to be

difficult(10CS35)
3. Students find it difficult to solve mathematical derivation concepts
&problems(10CS32)
Actions
1Practical approach of teaching programming to be adapted.(10CS35)
10CS35, 10CS45, 10CS32.10CS56
Observations :
difficult(10CS35)
3. Students find it difficult to solve mathematical derivation concepts &
problems(10CS32)
4.Students find it difficult to solve Turing machine concepts &
PDA(10CS56)
Actions
1Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts (10CS45)
10CS35, 10CS45, 10CS32.10CS56
Observations :
difficult(10CS35)
problems(10CS32)
PDA(10CS56)
Actions
10CS35, 10CS45, 10CS32.10CS56
Observations :

1.Atainement level still it is 47.06% we need to improve

difficult(10CS35)
problems(10CS32)
PDA(10CS56)
Actions
10CS35, 10CS45, 10CS32.10CS56
Observations :
1.Atainement level still it is 44.95% we need to improve
difficult(10CS35)
problems(10CS32)
PDA(10CS56)
Actions
PO10 67.74% 75.76% Attainment can be improved in following subjects
10CS56,10CS35
Observations :
PDA(10CS56)
2.Solving dynamic problem and greedy techniques found to be
difficult(10CS35)
Actions:
2. More problems will be given for practice(10CS56)
10CS32,
Observations :

1.Solving circuits problems found to be lengthy(10CS32)

2.Students find it difficult to solve mathematical derivation concepts &
problems(10CS32)
Actions:
1. More problems will be given for practice(10CS32)
10CS32,10CS45
Observations :
1 Students find it difficult to solve mathematical derivation concepts &
problems(10CS32)
Actions:
1.Solving circuits problems found to be lengthy(10CS32)
2.Students find it difficult to solve mathematical derivation concepts & problems(10CS32)
3.More assembly level programming to be taught in tutorial classes(10CS45)
PSOs Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2015-16) CAYm2
PSO Target Attainment Observations

s level level
PSO1: Statement as mentioned in Annexure II
PSO1 1.89 2.26 Attainment is low in the following subjects
10EC61,10ES42,10EC65
Observations :
1. Students are not exposed to basic of Random process(10EC61)
2. Subject involves both ALP & C programming which confuses
students.(10EC42)
3.Students find difficult to understand conceptual virtual
memory(10EC65)
Actions
1.Additional classes to be conducted to introduce random process and refresh probability
basics(10EC61)
2.Practical approach of teaching programming to be adapted.(10EC42)
3.More examples on virtual memory to be practiced by students in extra classes(10EC65)
PSO2 1.66 2 Attainment is low in the following subjects
10EC36,10EC63
Observations :
1.Subject involves vector mathematics which is difficult for

students.(10EC36)
2.Basic knowledge of MOSFET is not well understood(10EC63)
Actions
1. Variety of problems to be solved , to make students understand better.(10EC36)
2. More emphasis on MOSFET basic to be given in the previous course(10EC63)
PSO3 2 2 Attainment is low in the following subjects
Attainment is low in the following subjects
10EC36,10EC63
Observations :
1.Subject involves vector mathematics which is difficult for students.(10EC36)
2.Basic knowledge of MOSFET is not well understood(10EC63)
Actions
1. Variety of problems to be solved , to make students understand better.(10EC36)
2. More emphasis on MOSFET basic to be given in the previous course(10EC63)


PSO ATTAINMENT LEVELS
7.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
ACADEMIC AUDITING
The process of Academic Auditing intends to monitor and enhance the quality of
technical education through proper guidelines for both teaching faculty and students, so as to
ensure qualified engineers/researchers passing out from Engineering Institutions, affiliated to
the A C S College Of engineering
OBJECTIVES OF ACADEMIC AUDITING:
(i) To ensure academic accountability.
(ii) To define quality of each component of the functionalities and to ensure quality of
technical education throughout the system.
(iii) To safeguard functionalities of technical education.
CSE Self Assessment Report 150 |

Page
(iv) To define effectiveness of teaching learning process and to devise methodology to

confirm maximum output from faculty members as well as students.
DOCUMENTS TO B E PRODUCED FOR AUDIT COURSE DIARY AND COURSE
FILE
Each affiliated institution has to maintain the details of various academic c activities in
the form of documents given below. These documents shall be made available to the
external auditor as and when required.
1. Class Time Table& Faculty Time Table
2. Students Roll List
3. Students Batch List ( for practical courses, projects)
4. Course Diary for all the courses including practical, seminar, project etc.
5. Course File
6. Equipment Log register used in Laboratories
7. Consolidated Attendance statement of students
8. Consolidated statement of marks of internal tests
9. Seminar presentation details
10. Project (Mini project/Design project/Final semester project) progress review

reports
11. Register of internal evaluation marks
12. Register of Remedial/Bridge/Language Lab classes
13. Result Analysis

A course diary is to be maintained by each staff of the department for each course handled by
him/her. Course Diary becomes a part of the course file
A sample of course diary is given

Page

Page
Observation by LIC of VTU Academic year 2015-16
Local inspection committee (LIC) External Auditor appointed by the University

Following observation given below

7.3 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship
Item 2012-16 2011-15 2010-14
Total No. of Final Year Students (N)

22 25 38
No. of students placed in companies or

Government Sector (x)
4 6 12
No. of students admitted to higher

studies with valid qualifying scores
(GATE or equivalent State or National
Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y) 0 3 5
No. of students turned entrepreneur in

engineering/technology (z) 0 0 0

7.4 Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program
Academic Year: 2015-2016
SL. Admission Category I Year

Total
No. NUMBER OF CET SNQ COMEDK MANAGEMENT
STUDENTS
1 ADMITTED 37 3 5 14 59
TOP RANK : 22672
LOW RANK : 103501
Admission Category II Year [Lateral]

SL. No. Total
CET
NUMBER OF
1 STUDENTS ADMITTED 02 02

Total
STUDENTS
1 ADMITTED 31 3 1 05 40

TOP RANK : 28834
LOW RANK : 122338

Total
STUDENTS
1 ADMITTED 34 3 0 08 44
TOP RANK : 44728
LOW RANK : 112050
Admission Category II Year [Lateral]

SL. No. Total
CET
NUMBER OF
1 STUDENTS ADMITTED 01 01

CRITERIA 8
FIRST YEAR
ACADEMICS

CRITERION 8 FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS 50
8.1 First year student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (5)
Assessment = (5 x 15)/average FYSFR (Limited to Max. 5)
Number of Branches Approved for Academic Year 203-14 = 7.
1. Aeronautical Engineering (60)

2. Biomedical Engineering (60)
3. Civil Engineering (60)
4. Computer science Engineering (60)
5. Electronics and Communication Engineering (60)
6. Electrical Engineering (60)
7. Mechanical Engineering (60)
Total intake 7 x 60 = 420.
Year Number of Students Number of Faculty Members FYSFR
( Approved Intake (Considering fractional load)

Strength)
2015-16 420 26 1:15
2014-15 420 22 1:15
2013-14 420 22 1:15
Average 420 23.33 1:15
Assessment= (5 x 3.2
15)/Average FYSFR
(Limited to Max. 5)
8.2 Qualification of Faculty teaching first year common courses (5)

Year X y(No. of Regular RF ( Number Assessment of

Faculty with P.G faculty members Faculty
(No. of Regular Qualification) as per SFR of qualification (5X
Faculty with 15:1) + 3Y)/RF
Ph.D)
2015-16 6 20 26 3.46
2014-15 6 16 22 3.54
2013-14 4 18 22 3.36
Average Assessment 3.45
8.3. First year Academic Performance (10)
Academic Year Branch Appeared for No. Successful Academic Performance

Examination Students
2015-16 AE
BME
CSE
Results yet to be announced. Once it is declared academic
Civil
performance will be calculated.
ECE
EEE
Mech
2014-15 AE 49 39 4.19
BME 37 29 3.99
CSE 39 21 2.79
Civil 48 27 2.65
ECE 35 26 3.96
EEE 14 6 2.09
Mech 52 36 3.22

2013-14 AE 52 52 5.71
BME 24 24 5.43
CSE 41 41 5.45
Civil 49 45 4.86
ECE 40 40 5.66
EEE 11 10 5.02
Mech 45 45 5.34
Academic Performance: (Mean of the percentage of marks in first year of all successful students/10) *
number of successful students/ number of students appeared for Examination)

8.4. Attainment of course outcomes of first year courses (10)
8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of course
outcomes of first year is done. (5)
2015-16 Three Internal tests for a maximum mark of 20 are conducted and best
of two internals is considered. The average of it is considered for final
internal assessment mark.
The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to the
COs is recorded.
End semester University exam performance of students for the
maximum mark of 80 is considered for external exam performance.
The summation of these two performances is considered as cumulative
assessment for a prescribed course out come.
For laboratory assessment, the performance of a student in conduction
of each experiment (10 marks), final lab internal test (10 marks) and
external lab exam(80 marks) is considered.

COs is recorded.
of each experiment(10 marks), final lab internal test(15 marks) and
COs is recorded.
of each experiment(10 marks), final lab internal test(15 marks) and
8.4.2. Record the attainment of course outcomes of all first year courses (5)

Academic year 2014-15
AE Engineering Physics
BME Engineering Physics

CSE Engineering Physics
Civil Engineering Physics

ECE Engineering Physics
EEE Engineering Physics

Mech Engineering Physics
8.5 Attainment of Programme outcomes from first year courses(20)
2014-15 (Engineering Physics)
1. Aeronautical Engineering

2. Biomedical Engineering
3. Computer Science & Engineering

4. Civil Engineering
5. Electronics and communication Engineering

6. Electrical and Electronics Engineering
7. Mechanical Engineering

8.5.1. Indicate result of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15)
Academic Year 2014-15
Aeronautical Engineering
Courses Subject PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C101 Engg. Maths1 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086 7.086
C102 Engg Maths2 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08
C103 Engg. Physics 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14
C104 Engg. Chemistry 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18 4.18
C105 Basic Electricals 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36 5.36
C106 Basic Electronics 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14
C107 Elements of Mechanical Engg 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066 5.066
Computer Concepts and
C108 Programming 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86
Direct
Attainment 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739 5.739
Biomedical Engineering
C101 Engg. Maths1 7.086 6.292 6.292 0 7.022 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.91
C102 Engg Maths2 8.41 0 6.34 0 7.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.65
C103 Engg. Physics 7.69 3.14 7.1 1.48 4.12 8.56 4.45 0 0 0 0 3.73
C104 Engg. Chemistry 4.58 5.88 7.33 0 0 6.59 5.74 0 0 0 0 4.91
C105 Basic Electricals 3.538 2.662 2.548 1.162 0 3.464 1.242 0 0 0 0.888 1.878
C106 Basic Electronics 7.14 5.45 5.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.47
C107 Elements of Mechanical Engg 5.066 4.528 4.528 0 5.042 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.77
C108 Computer Concepts and Programming 2.86 3.1 2.52 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1.12

Direct Attainment 5.796 3.882 5.216 0.330 2.913 2.327 1.429 0.041 0.000 0.041 0.111 3.055
Computer Science Engineering
C101 Engg. Maths1 7.086 6.292 6.292 0 7.022 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.91
C102 Engg Maths2 5.15 5.88 3.82 0 4.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.79
C103 Engg. Physics 6.152 2.522 5.65 1.148 3.244 6.916 3.546 0 0 0 0 2.972
C104 Engg. Chemistry 2.63 3.34 4.32 0 0 3.91 3.43 0 0 0 0 2.89
Direct Attainment 4.987 4.252 4.377 0.299 2.4398 1.83175 1.034 0.041 0 0.0413 0.13 2.4948
Civil Engineering
C101 Engg. Maths1 7.086 6.292 6.292 0 7.022 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.91
C102 Engg Maths2 4.918 4.42 4.42 0 4.982 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.67
C103 Engg. Physics 5.54 2.56 4.892 0.912 2.776 6.656 3.12 0 0 0 0 2.972
C104 Engg. Chemistry 3.35 4.32 5.32 0 0 4.75 4.16 0 0 0 0 3.53
C105 Basic Electricals 3.25 2.55 2.22 1.13 0 3 1 0 0 0 0.77 1.8
C108 Programming 2.86 3.1 2.52 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1.12

Electronics and communication Engineering
C101 Engg. Maths1 4.918 4.42 4.42 0 4.982 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.67
C102 Engg Maths2 6.17 7 4.53 0 4.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3
C103 Engg. Physics 8.388 3.174 7.89 1.484 4.4 9.3 5.018 0 0 0 0 3.896
C104 Engg. Chemistry 3.06 3.96 4.92 0 0 4.29 3.76 0 0 0 0 3.28
C108 Programming 2.86 3.1 2.52 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1.12
Electrical and
Electronics Engineering
C101 Engg. Maths1 4.918 4.42 4.42 0 4.982 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.67
C102 Engg Maths2 4.59 4.116 4.116 0 4.634 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.49
C103 Engg. Physics 8.12 3.248 7.412 1.48 4.472 8.888 4.724 0 0 0 0 3.816
C104 Engg. Chemistry 4.19 1.38 2.24 1.2 0 2.3 2.3 0 0 0 0 2.3
C105 Basic Electricals 4.325 4.985 3.255 0 3.54 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.39
C108 Computer Concepts and 2.86 3.1 2.52 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1.12

Programming
Direct Attainment 5.151 3.903 4.1951 0.335 2.8338 1.3985 0.878 0.041 0 0.0413 0 2.3783
Mechanical Engineering
C101 Engg. Maths1 4.918 4.42 4.42 0 4.982 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.67
C102 Engg Maths2 6.81 7.7 4.98 0 5.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.61
C103 Engg. Physics 6.228 2.396 5.668 0.92 3.264 6.988 3.716 0 0 0 0 2.872
C104 Engg. Chemistry 3.95 5.07 6.39 0 0 5.66 4.95 0 0 0 0 4.26

CRITERIA 9
STUDENT SUPPORT
SYSTEMS

CRITERION 9 STUDENT SUPPORT

SYSTEMS
STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM
9.1 Mentoring System
An effective Student mentoring system (SMS) has already been implemented in

our college.
All the students of the college are coming under this system from the date of
joining the college.
A complete track of the student activities like Academic, Curricular, Co curricular
Extra Curricular achievements, Social activities and the details of Parent Meetings
are registered in the system.
A Mentoring Register has been distributed to all the staffs of the college .Each
staff is allocated with 10- 15 students under the mentoring system.
Faculties will have a meeting with the students periodically and their Academic
progress and all his activities are discussed and noted in the register
Any discrepancies in the student behaviour like Attendance , etc will be
questioned and will be counseled with care
Staff will be submitting the register to the high level Mentoring /Counselling
committee with members like Head of the institution ,HOD
The committees will scrutinize case by case and suggest corrective measures
If necessary the committee will have discussions with the Parents and Medical
Counselor
9.2. Feedback analysis and Rewards and Corrective Measures
Three types of Feedback system is followed
1. Direct Feedback from the Students

Every department have constituted Class Committees for Each semester with Staffs and
student Members .Student members are invited to express their view on Subjects on the
Academic Environment of the department and the feedback is collected by the chairman
of the Committee and submitted to the HOD for further actions.
2. Interactive Feedback
Principal will be conducting interactive meeting only with the section of students regarding
the Academic activities and collect the feedback from the students directly.
3. Consolidate Feedback
Feedback forms are circulated and collected from all students of the class collected
Various awards for the students based on the performance of the awards

Rewards
College Toppers based on the academic performance

Best outgoing Student award
Department Toppers
Certificate to Students having 100% Attendance
Certificate to students securing topper in each subject
9.3. Feedback on Faculties
9.3.1 INTRODUCTION
Staff appraisal report consists of the appraisal PERCENTAGE for the different entities of the
College like Student, Staff and Vice Principals and the following feedback has been carried out
1) Student on Staffs
2) Staffs self appraisal (Department wise )
3) Staffs on HOD (Department wise )
4) Staffs on VPs Department wise on VP ADMIN VP ACADEMIC
5) HOD on staffs (Department wise )
6) HOD on VPs (Department wise )
7) VPs on HOD ( VP ADMIN,VPACADAMIC)
9.3.2.0 Methodology of Appraisal
Based on the feedback forms carried out following methodology is adapted
Table-WEIGHTAGE MATRIX
CATAGE SUB STUDENT HOD CO- EXTRA TOT
ORY PASS FEEDBAC CURRICUL CURRICU AL
% K AR LAR
ACTIVITIE ACTIVITI
S ES
STAFF 35 30 15 10 10 100
CATAGE SUB STUDENT STAFF VP FEED CO- EXTRA
ORY PASS FEEDBAC FEEDB BACK CURRICU CURRICU
% K ACK LAR LAR
ACTIVITIE ACTIVITI
S ES
HOD 30 20 20 10 10 10 100
CATAGE SUB MANAGE STAFF HOD COLLEGE GROUP
ORY PASS MENT

% FEEDBAC
K
VP 30 25 25 10 10 100


9.4. Self Learning
Wi-Fi enabled campus

Internet access to all the computers for the benefit of students.
Edusat Program from the university.
Projects, Internship Modeling Webinar, Video conferring Edusat, NPTEL materials
Accession of Journals
Newspaper of major languages
Open Book Test
e-notes for all subjects of all Department
Digital Library
9.5 Carrier Guidance, training and Placement

Branch/In
stitution Company
Date Sl. no Activity Remarks
Name
The seminar was very
informative to the
students, as the students
Purvankar Seminar 1st year had access to get in touch
4/9/2015 1 Sherphify
a students with the top employers
and various study
materials about the
employable skills.
informative to the
Communication Seminar 2nd students, as we have
10/9/2015 2
Skills year students explained the importance
of Communication skills
MGIRD in the industries.
informative to the
students, as the students
Seminar 3rd & had access to get in touch
11/9/2015 3 Sherphify
4th year students with the top employers
and various study
NASSCO materials about the
M-iPrimed employable skills.
Seminar on
Industries Good and students were
12/9/2015 4 NIIT
prerequisite eager to take up the
MGIRD skills aptitude test.
Introduction on
Prototyping and Students were happy and
Apple wanted to take up further
IOS Creative application test on Prototyping as its
15/09/2015 5
Infotech development a basic requirements
programe demanded the companies
Larsen&T affiliated with to build/work on a
oubro VTU. project.
Bhagya:-Deployed soft
16/092015 6 - Soft Skills skills program on
Importance of
KPTCL Communication skills

Certificate
program
IOS Finishing conducted by This certification
22/09/2015 7
School IOS Finishing program was informative
School/VTU on also; added more value to
KPTCL Prototyping the profile.
Seminar on
informative to the
Industries
ICFAI Business students, as the students
29/09/2015 8 prerequisite
School were able to get an idea
skills &
of the industries
Aptitude test
KPTCL requirements.
Conducted 2
hours seminar
on Soft skills
Importance of
23/09/2015 Soft Skills
Communication
to 9 Training
skills/ Time
3/10/2015 Program
Management/Cri The students were very
tical thinking/ happy and wanted more
Larsen & Creativity/ classes on soft skills
Toubro Documentation. regularly.
Importance of
Soft Skills Time
12/10/2015 10 Training Management for
Larsen & Program 1st year and 2nd
Toubro year students
Critical
Soft Skills
Thinking for
13/10/2015 11 Training
final year
Program
KPTCL students
Toonmedi
a-Free-
Soft Skills Creativity for
Japanese
15/10/2015 12 Training 2nd year
Language
Program students
training
program
Group
Soft Skills Discussion on
16/10/2015 13 Training Current Affairs
Reddonatu Program for final year
ra students

Points to be
Soft Skills discussed during
20/10/2015 14 IBS(ICFAI Training the HR rounds
Business Program for Final Year
School) students
Met Mr. Ramesh Rao,
requested for an invite
Yellamma our students for campus
Dassapa Campus drive, said that the next
6/11/2015 15
Institution of Recruitment drive will happen only in
Aseuro Technology the month of Jan 2016,
Technolog he'll keep us posted on
ies the same.
Conducted 1
hour seminar on
importance of
7/11/2015 16 Seven Sense knowing the Students were happy and
Aseuro bridge between wanted to take up more
Technolog the institutions sessions on this aptitude
ies and industries test etc.
Rajeev from
Seven Sense:
Conducted 1
Seven Sense hour Aptitude
7/11/2015 17
Aptitude Test test at CS lab
with 40 students Students were happy and
Larsen & were present for wanted to take up more
Toubro the test of aptitude test etc.
Soft Skills
Training
Program on
9/11/2015 18 T&P Initiative
Communication Students were happy and
skills for 1st wanted to take up more
KPTCL Year students of aptitude test etc.
Ind Expo
(Karnataka
CNC Tech
Pvt Ltd- Off Campus
13/11/2015 19 T&P Initiative
Rajajinaga Recruitment
r-
Bangalore-
10) SJBIT

Soft Skills
Training
ATS ELGI Program on
13/11/2015 20 Industrial T&P Initiative Effective Students were happy and
Sales communication wanted to take up more
Corporatio skills for 3rd of sessions based on the
n Year students market rquirements.
Informed that
ARK they will inform
Industries about the
Singasandr number of
Ashwini(HR &
14/11/2015 21 a Village, candidates list in
marketing)
Begur another 15days
Hobli, for their new
Bangalore project starting Students required from
South up shortly. CV, ECE & EEE
Informed that
they will inform
Comtron about the
Electric(In number of
dia) candidates list in
14/11/2015 22 Sunil
Jayanthi 4days for the
Nagar internships and
post, MoU's will be
Bangalore- signed Students required from
43 accordingly. CV.
Sri
Vigneshwa
ra
Enterprises
23 Rajajinaga Was OK with
r Industrial the MoU draft
town, Dr.Shobha and agreed to
Bangalore- Anand Reddy/ sign the MoU on
30/11/2015 44 Senior Faculty 4th Dec 2015
Prithvi Mr. Mukund Requested to run
Chemical Jhunjhunwala, the Aricent
Manufactu Business Head, Employability
ring Co. Operations, program at ACS
24
Pvt Ltd iPRIMED College of
KSSIDC Educations Engineering In collaboration with
Industrial Solutions,/ Mr. from Feb 2016 NASSCOM and NSDC
1/12/2015 Area, Santosh till Mar 2016 and NO's

Tumkur Abraham, followed with

Dist- Associate VP, On Campus
572168 NASSCOM Drive in the
Foundation, month of April
Bangalore, 2016 for ECE,
NAVIN BME and CSE
KUMAR-CEO departments.
iprimed
KASSIA
Magadi
Chord
Road,
Vijayanag
ar,
25
Bangalore-
40
Small Executive
scale Director-
industries Dr.Shobha Signed MoU for
4/12/2015 association Anand Reddy 1 year
QUALIDE
LS
Andhrahall
i Main
Road, Redirected to
26
Near Head office
Peenya Kumarakrupa
2nd stage, Road Bangalore
Bangalore- GE. Vasanth for further
8/12/2015 91 Kumar Approval.
SECO Recommended
Smart to meet AE
Technolog maintenance
ies Rajajinagar
Authorised
Distributer
27 s for
SECO
Make
Cutting
Tools & Mr. Girish
Accessorie Rajarajeshwari
10/12/2015 s Nagar

JAYALA Recommended
KSHMI to meet the chief
POLY Engineer at
PACKS Anand Rao
PVT LTD Circle
Manufactu
28 rers of
Plastic
Speciality
Polyfilms
& Allied Mr. Girish
Packaging Rajarajeshwari
14/12/2015 Products Nagar
Submitted the
written
application at
TIDE the dispatch and
29 Technolog gave the
y acknowledgeme
Informatic nt and asked to
s Design revisit after
15/12/2015 Endeavour Mr. Raghupathi. 4days.
KSIC Requested to
A meet the HR
30 Governme head directly at
nt of India Kumarakrupa
17/12/2015 Enterprise Sujitha Road
Accepted the
letter and
informed to
follow-up on
31
Friday, since the
HR head
Shiva Kumar- Mr.Vikasranjan
18/12/2015 MSME Asst HR is on vacation.
Advised to
Informed the
number of
students
32
CE-transmission attending the
Zone/ Mrs. industrial tour
Mythili along with the
18/12/2015 EE specified date,

also; asked to
contact the
HRD-Training
at Hoody for
guest lecture.
Proposed for
Japan Desk,
need to speak to
33 the management
about the same
Mr.B.G.Sreedha to take further
19/12/2015 ra decision.
Interested in
EEE branch
students, and
34
would let us
know in the near
28/12/2015 Aayush Gupta future.
Requested to
deploy industry
specific training
35
program, would
be scheduled
30/12/2015 Lima Sadhukhan shortly.
Requested to
organize a
36 campus drive at
ACS College of
8/1/2016 Sandeep.C Engineering
Conducted
Campus drive a
ACS College of
Engineering.
3students got
selected for final
round of
37
interview and 1
got selected for
the HR round,
which is shortly
to be scheduled
Sandeep.C and at the clients
13/01/2016 team site.

Informed that
they have listed
college on
which they
choose to permit
for project
38
works as well as
campus drives
and will get
back if our
college is been
14/01/2016 Sujisha (HR) shortlisted.
Submitted the
Xerox of the
written
application and
requested to do
the needful at
the earliest.
39 permitted to
visit the station
on 10th Feb
2016, got the
confirmation
letter to visit the
Mr.Balachandra Somanahalli
18/01/2016 PS industry visit.
40
Venkatesh R Invited for
20/01/2016 Campus drive
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering
(Company is
41
interested to hire
ME &
Automobile
20/01/2016 Umesh B A students)

Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering
42 (Company is
interested to hire
ME students in
20/01/2016 Shashikiran KR future)
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering and
43
requested to
come for
20/01/2016 Suhail Ahmed.S campus drive.
J.S Babu Introduced the
SS Fabrication, ACS College of
Boilers, Tig Engineering
44 Welding, (Company is
Railings, SS & interested to hire
Aluminium 3D CVE students in
21/01/2016 Letters future)
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering
(Company is
interested to hire
45
All the
branches)Dropp
ed and email
Ashwin requesting for a
21/01/2016 D.Acharya campus drive
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering
(Company is
interested to hire
46
All the
branches)Dropp
ed and email
Praveen.B requesting for a
21/01/2016 Chair man campus drive

Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering
47
Ravikiran (Company is
Kulkarni interested to hire
21/01/2016 CEO ME students)
Introduced the
ACS College of
48 Engineering
(Company is
interested to hire
21/01/2016 Suresh.S AE students)
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering
49
Vinod Kumar (Company is
S.B interested to hire
25/01/2016 Marketing Head ME students)
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering and
50
requested to
Malleswaram come for
25/01/2016 Bangalore-03 campus drive.
Introduced the
ACS College of
Engineering and
51
requested to
Ravi Oran come kfor
28/01/2016 Asst.Manager campus drive.
Devaraj.K Introduced the
MSME ACS College of
Development Engineering and
Institute requested to
Ministry of provide the data
52
Micro, Small& of the SME,
Medium need to visit to
Enterprises. collect the data
Rajajinagar- in 2nd week of
28/01/2016 bangalore-10 Feb 2016.

Introduced and
Purushotham.B requested to
53 V started the
Fully Loaded training since
1/2/2016 Training Faculty 2nd Feb 2016.
Deployed soft
skills programs
based on
Lokesh.S Industry specific
3/2/2016 54 Soft Skill trainer knowledge.
9.6 Entrepreneurship Cell
Entrepreneurship cell is established at ACS College of Mechanical Engineering and various

events was organized to know the importance of being an entrepreneur and ways to get financial
assistance to become an entrepreneur and at present Entrepreneurship Awareness programme
is going to be organized between 18-20th February 2016 to create awareness to the faculty and
students
9.7. Co-Curricular and Extra-Curricular Activities
Extra-Curriculum Activities
Sl.No Events
1. Rangoli
2. Poetry Writing
3. Sudoku
4. Mehendi
5. Essay Writing (English/Kannada)
6. Debate(English/Kannada)
7. Quiz
8. Pick N Speak(English/Kannada)
9. Pot Painting
10. Sketching
11. Cookingwithout fire
12. Painting
13. Dumb Charades
14. Anthakshari
15. Collage

Sports Facilities:
Sports Club
International Cricket Ground
Gymnasium
Foot Ball Ground
Basket Ball Ground
Volley Ball Court
Recreation Room
1. Chess
2. Carom
3. Table Tennis
Swimming Pool

CRITERIA 10
GOVERANCE,
INSTITUTIONAL
SUPPORT &
FINANCIAL
RESOURCES

CRITERION 10 GOVERANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT &

FINANCIAL RESOURCES
10.1.2 GOVERNING BODY

10.1.2.1 List of Governing Council Members for the year 2013-2014
Sl.N
Name Qualification Designation
o
Chairman & Managing
Sri. A. C. Shanumugam B. A., Trustee
1
Founder, MCET, Former MLA & MP L L.B.,
Sri. A.C.S Arun Kumar B.Tech (Hons)

2 Vice Chairman & Member
President, Dr. M.G.R University MBA
Dr. P.T. Manoharan
3 Vice-Chancellor, University of Madras, Ph. D Advisor & Member
Chennai
Prof. Venkatachalappa .M
4 Former Prof & Head, Dept of Maths, Ph. D Advisor & Member
Central College, Bangalore
Dr. K. Ramachandra
5 Ph. D Advisor & Member
Former Director, GTRE, Bangalore
Dr. H.B Paniraj,
6 Principal, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Ph. D VTU Nominated Member
Bangalore
Prof. A.M Prasanna Kumar
7 ME Member
Prof & HOD of ECE, ACSCE, Bangalore
Sri. Ramesh. C
8 Assoc Prof, Dept of Mech Engg, ACSCE, ME Member
Bangalore
Dr. Krishna Kumar

9 Regional Officer, AICTE, South West Region, Ph. D Member
Bangalore
Prof. H.U. Talwar
10 ME Member
DTE, Govt. of Karnataka, Bangalore
11 Dr. M.R. Shivakumar Ph. D Ex-Officio Member

Principal, ACSCE, Bangalore Secretary & Principal
10.2.1.2List of Governing Council Members List of Governing

Council Members for the year 2014-2015
Sl.N
o
Sri. A. C. Shanumugam B. A., Chairman
1
Founder, MCET L L.B.,
Dr. P.T. Manoharan
2 Former Vice-Chancellor, University of Madras, Ph. D Advisor & Member
Chennai
Sri A.C.S ArunKumar,
Vice chairman, B.Tech(Honors)
3 Member
MBA
Rajarajeswari Group of Institutions
Prof R.M Vasagam
5 Former Vice Chancellor,AnnaUniversity, Ph. D Advisor & Member
Chennai
6 V.T.U Nominee Ph. D VTU Nominated Member
Dr.RaviKumar B N
7 Ph.D Member
Prof & HOD of Civil Engg, ACSCE, Bangalore
Prof R.Elangovan
8 Prof & HOD of Aeronautical Engg, ACSCE, ME Member
Bangalore, Bangalore
Dr M.sunderasan
9 Regional Officer& Director, AICTE, South West Ph. D Member
Region, Bangalore
Prof. H.U. Talwar
10 ME Member
Dr. H.B Phani Raju Ex-Officio Member
11 Ph. D
Principal, ACSCE, Bangalore Secretary & Principal

10.2.1.3List of Governing Council Members List of Governing

Council Members for the year 2015-2016
List of Governing Council Members
Sl.N
o
Sri. A. C. Shanumugam B. A., Chairman
1
Founder, MCET L L.B.,
Dr. P.T. Manoharan
2 Former Vice-Chancellor, University of Madras, Ph. D Advisor & Member
Chennai
Sri A.C.S ArunKumar,
Vice chairman, B.Tech(Honors)
3 Member
MBA
Rajarajeswari Group of Institutions
Prof R.M Vasagam
5 Former Vice Chancellor,AnnaUniversity, Ph. D Advisor & Member
Chennai
V.T.U Nominee VTU Nominated

6 Ph. D
Member
Mr. Sundramoorthy
7 Former Scientist ISRO & Mission Director Indian Member
Commn Satellite System, Bangalore
Prof R.Elangovan
8 Prof & HOD of Aeronautical Engg, ACSCE, ME Member
Bangalore, Bangalore
Dr Ramesh Unni Krishnan
Director cum Regional Officer,AICTE, South AICTE Nominee &
9 Ph. D
Member
Western Region, Bangalore
Prof. H.U. Talwar
10 ME Member
Dr. Dr. Punal M Arabi
Professor & Head, Dept. of Bio-Medical Engg., Ex-Officio Member
11 ACS College of Engineering, Bangalore. Ph. D
Secretary & Principal
M.S.Murali, Principal Faculty Nominee &

12 Ph. D
Principal, ACSCE, Bangalore Member

10.1.2 Administrative Set-up:

We at ACSCE believe in FAMILY KIND of work culture. Basically it aims at love and affection
to each and every stake-holder of the institute. In particular, the concept of process owners,
which facilitates a perfect decentralization of activities and delegation of authorities, has proven
itself to be a key concept in the success achieved by the institute on different counts. The
working methodology basically a student centric, which is the dearest and highly responsible
element of the system.
Involvement of each and everyone in the decision-making at their respective levels is ensured
through decentralization and delegation of powers. Hence there are various institutional
committees consisting of faculty and staff members. Transparency associated therein also forms
an important feature of the work culture. This is done through an institutional rule book and
code of conduct document which is easily accessible by any one as the copies are available in the
library, with the HODs and the Principal.
The institute functions with perfect decentralized administration as depicted in Figure 1 that has
complete transparency in the decision making process.
Functions of Key Administrative Positions:
The functions of various key positions are depicted in Table below.
Position Functions
Frame directive principles and policies
Governing
Amend and approve policies from time to time
Council
Approve budgets
Chairman/Chairma To look after the overall development of the institute
n Rep i.e., Executive Mobilize external resources to strengthen the institute
Director Plan & provide for necessary facilities / equipments for development
Instill confidence and devotion in every member of the institute
Design & define organization structure
Principal
Define & delegate responsibilities of various positions in the organization
Ensure periodic monitoring & evaluation, of various processes & sub-

processes
Ensure effective purchase procedure
Define quality policy and objectives
Prepare annual budget
Conduct periodic meeting of various bodies such as Governing Council,
LMC, Standing Committee and Grievances Redressal Committee etc
Manage accounts and finance
Employee recruitment process
Office Administration
Compliance with AICTE, DTE & University
Admission
Resource Generation
Internal and External examinations
Library Up gradation
To discharge routine duty of Principal during absence of Principal
Annual Magazine
Resource Provision
Transport
Alumni interaction
Housekeeping including hostels
Prepare and execute academic calendar
Vice- Principal
Oversee the teaching-learning process
Carry out result analysis and submit corrective measures to Principal
Initiate supplementary teaching measures
Co-curricular activities
Formation of student council
Cultural activities
Sports activities

Student discipline
Student health care
Student orientation
QMS coordination as MR
Establish, implement and maintain quality management system
Arranging internal audits and MRM
I/C Quality
Maintain up-to-date master documents with history of revision.
Management System
Oversee Employee Attendance System & Maintain the monthly
and Estate
attendance report
Maintaining updated building plans
Overall building maintenance
Propose admission policy
Arrange campaign
Execute the admission process
Public Relations
Design and print admission brochure
Officer
Maintain and update college website
Maintain softcopy of photographs
Publicity of events
Formation of student council (SC)
Arrange periodic meetings of SC
I/C Alumni Ensure alumni registration
Association Prepare alumni news letter
Arrange Runanubandha meet
Proposing annual budget
Smooth running of college workshop
I/C Workshop Preparing Material Requirement
Oversee the routine work

Oversee the college bus service

Oversee the generator facility
I/C Employee Identifying training needs of employees
Development Cell, Notify the employees about various Employee Development programmes
Training Officer Arrange Employee Development Programmes
Maintain training records
Liasoning with AICTE, DTE and University
College roster
Service Books
Faculty personal files
Recruitment process
Administrative
Maintain minutes of meeting (all)
Officer
New proposals
Co ordinate day to day activities of office
Purchase process
AICTE, DTE, SU committee preparation
Annual College budget
Shikshan Shulka Samiti requirements
Liaison with industry
Student Training and Placement
Placement Officer Identify and provide for training needs of students
Arrange campus interviews
Proposing annual T & P budget
Plan and execute modus operandi of routine activity of the library
Plan and propose expansion / development
I/C Library
Maintain library discipline and culture
Prepare annual budget for library
I/C Counseling Cell Facilitate career guidance to students

Assist students suffering from psychological disorders

Arrange for professional counselors
Maintain record of counseling activities
Student academic counseling
Provide slow-pace programme for weaker students
Arrange remedial classes for weaker students
Central time table
Monitoring of lectures and practical
Conduction of internal examinations
I/C Monitoring Cell Students feedback
Collective attendance of students
Co-ordinate the activities of class teachers
Submission of term work and POE mark lists
Organize events through students professional societies / chapters
Organize paper and design contests
I/C Student Encourage student participation
Professional Publication of technical magazine and news letters
Activities Record of student participation and achievements in Co-curricular and
extra curricular activities
Maintain record of such events
Ensure smooth conduct of sports
Ensure proper use of gym
I/C Gymnasium/ Purchasing of sport items
Sports Encourage students to participate in zonal tournaments
Creation and upkeep of sports facilities
Proposing annual budget
Head of Plan and execute academic activities of the department
Departments Maintain discipline and culture in the department

Maintain the department neat and clean

Pick and promote strengths of students / faculty / staff
Monitor academic activities of the department
Propose Department Budget
Adhere to QMS Procedures
Maintain records of departmental activities and achievements
10.1.2.3 Define Rules, Procedures, Recruitment and Promotional Policies, etc..,

The rules and policies regarding recruitment and promotion are as per AICTE and
Moogambigai Charitable and Education Trust (MCET).
The AICTE pay scales are implemented periodically.
Additional increments are given to staff members who excel in academics and research.
Recruitment Procedure:
Advertisement: In leading News Papers requesting the eligible candidates as per AICTE
norms to apply within a given time to the Principal.
Applications: The applications along with the Resume and supporting documents will be
collected at the office of HR, RRGI, Bangalore.
Listing: After the applications are received, a list will be prepared highlighting the
eligibility, Qualification and experience.
Merit List: Will be prepared as per the requirements of the individual department.
Expert Body: An expert panel consisting of Special officer, Principal, HOD, subject
expert and a University nominee will be formed.
Call Letters: Eligible Candidates will be called for interview.
Interview: Discussions with the candidates to know their potentials, strengths, teaching
skills etc., will be conducted.
Selection: Based on the performance and requirement, selection list in the order of merit
will be prepared.
Orders: Appointment orders are issued to selected candidates.
Duty report: Selected Candidates should report to the duty on or before the given time.

10.1.3 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL SYSTEM

Grievance Redressal Cell headed by Dr. M.S. Murali shall meet within a week from the date of
receipt of any petition/complaint from anybody and take necessary action as deem fit and initiate
necessary action for solving problem.
Grievance Redressal Committee for the academic year 2013-14 & 2014-2015 at ACSCE is
reconstituted as under consequent on relocation of some of the faculty members.
GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC YEAR 2015-16
Sl No Name Designation
1. Dr. M.S. Murali Chairman
2. Prof. R.R. Elangovan Convener
3. Mrs. Vanishree Moji Representative of Faculty
4. Mr. Siddesha. H.S Student Welfare Officer
5. Respective Head of Departments Representative of Faculty
6. Mrs. Usha. M Representative of Staff
7. Ms. Dhanya G Student Representative
8. Mr. Riyaz Ali Durani Student representative

Sl. No. Name Designation

Prof R. Elangovan Chairman
1.
Vice-Principal, ACSCE, Bangalore-74
Dr. H. B. Phani Raju, Convener
2.
Principal, ACSCE, Bangalore-74
Mrs. Vanishree Moji Representative of Faculty
3.
Asst. Professor, Dept. of ECE, ACSCE,Bangalore-74
Mr. Siddesha. H.S Student Welfare Officer
4.
Dept of Mechanical, ACSCE,Bangalore-74
Respective Head of Departments Representative of Faculty
5.
ACSCE,Bangalore-74
Mrs. Usha. M Representative of Staff
6.
Instructor Dept of CSE, ACSCE,Bangalore-74
Mr. Tabrez Nadvi A Student Representative
7. Dept of AE,8th Sem BE, Department of AE
ACSCE, Bangalore-74
Ms. Gayathri A.V Student representative
8.
8th Sem BE, Dept of CSE, Bangalore

Sl. No. Name Designation

Prof. Dr. M. Murugesh Mudaliar Chairman
1.
Rector-RRGI, Bangalore
Prof. Dr. M.R. Shivakumar Convener
2.
Principal, ACSCE, Bangalore
Mrs. Vanishree Moji Representative of Faculty
3.
Dept of ECE, ACSCE, Bangalore
Mr. Siddesha. H.S Student Welfare Officer
4.
Dept of MECH, ACSCE, Bangalore
Respective Head of Departments Representative of Faculty
5.
ACSCE, Bangalore
Mrs. Usha. M Representative of Staff
6.
Asst Prof Dept of CSE, ACSCE, Bangalore
Mr. Pradeep M.S 6th Sem BE, Dept of MECH, Student Representative
7.
ACSCE, Bangalore
Ms. Deepika J 6nd Sem BE, Dept of ECE, ACSCE, Student representative
8.
Bangalore
Anti-Ragging Committees for the academic year 2013-14:

1. These groups are formed to prevent and to curb the menace of Ragging.
2. The following team members are informed to act members of Anti- ragging group from
1.8.2013
3. Group members are informed to make surprise visits as per the schedule given below and
one of the team members are requested to write a brief report after Inspection in the
register.

ANTI RAGGING COMMITTEE: (To Monitor in both in Morning & Evening)

Sl.
Name of the Member Designation Contact No
No.
1. Prof. A.M Prasanna Kumar Vice Principal 8867590052
2. Mr. Siva subramaniyam. R Asso Prof 9945535836
3. Prof. Ramesh C Asso. Prof 9035366043
ANTI RAGGING SQUADS (Lunch Break) Canteen, Campus, Classrooms, Library
Sl.
No.
1. DR. Selvarani Professor & HOD 9964144757
2. Dr. RaviKumar B.N Asst.Prof
8861331671
3. Mr. Vijay Mahantesh Asst.Prof 9845011148
DEDICATED CADRE OF WARDEN: Visit to Canteen, Campus, Classrooms, Hostel

Sl.
No.
1. Mr. Madesha J Hostel Warden 9945898247
2. Mrs. Chitrakala Hostel Warden 9900026015
PROFESSIONAL COUNSELOR: (Evening around 3 Pm) Visit to Canteen , Cam[pus,

Classrooms
Sl.
No.
1. Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar Professor 8867590052
2. Dr. Ravikumar B N Professor 8861331671
3. Dr. Raju B.R Professor 8884451258
4. Mrs. Selvarani Professor 09887150218

In addition to the committees or bodies presented above, the college has the following Non-
statutory committee
Sl. No Committee Headed By

1 Academic Dr. M.R Shivakumar
2 Sports Prof. Ramesh C
3 Cultural Mrs. Deepa
4 Placement Mr. Nabi
5 Library Dr. Selva Rani
6 Hostel and canteen Dr. C.S. Pillai
7 Transport Mr. M.S Shivakumar
8 College Day Mr. R Sivasubramanian
9 Student Welfare Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
10 Magazine All Department Heads
11 Drug Abuse Dr. Ravikumar B N
12 Co-operative Mr. Sanjeev kumar
13 Seminar Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
14 Workshop Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
15 Conference Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
16 Promotion of Brand image Dr. C.S. Pillai

17 Parent/Relation All Department Heads
18 Disciplinary All Department Heads
19 ISTE Dr. Suresh R
20 EDUSAT Programme Prof. A. M. Prasanna Kumar
21 Alumni Association Mr. Ramesh C
22 Media Co-ordinator Dr. Suresh R
23 NSS Co-ordinator Mr. M.S. Shivakumar

24 Mentoring of Student Welfare Respective Mentors

25 Counselling Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
26 Research Development Dr. Selvarani
27 Project Exhibition Dr. Raju. B R
28 Estate Officer Mr. Athipathiraj
29 NBA NIL
30 ISO Mr. R Sivasubramanian
31 Purchase Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
32 Journal Mr. Ravikumar .N
Chairmans Vision
Incubation Centre Vice Principal
33
Software Development Cell ( Academic,Admin)
Energy Park
34 LIC/AICTE Coordinators Mr. lLokanadham M
Industry Institution Interaction Mr. Yogi Adarsh
35
Cell
36 Red Cross Mr. Ramesh C
37 GD Cell Dr. C.S. Pillai
Attendance/ Class Teaching of Individual Faculties
38 Every Class/ Student Progress
Communication
a) Cultural Club Mrs. Deepa
b) Heritage Club Mr. M S Shivakumar
c) Sports Club Mr. R. Siva subramanian
39 d) Green Club Mr. Laxmi G Gandagi
e) Creative Club Mrs. Jyothi Metan
f) Innovation Club Mr. Mahantesh Matapath
g) Yoga Club Dr. C.S. Pillai

h) Cricket Club Mr. Ramesh C
10.1.4 Delegation of financial power

S.NO DESGNATION LIMIT TO SANCTION
1 PRINCIPAL 2,00,000
2 HODS 5,000
Sl. No. Name Position

1 Mr. S Vijay Anand Executive Director
2 Dr. M. R. Shivakumar Principal
3 Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar Vice Principal( Administration)
Head of Department Electronics &
4 Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar
Communication
Head of Department Computer Science &
5 Dr. Selvarani
Engineering
6 M.R. Shivakumar Head of Department Electrical Engineering
7 Dr. Neerajarani Head of Department Basic Sciences
8 Mr. Ramesh C In-Charge, Alumni Association
9 Mr. Ramesh C In-Charge, Workshop
In-Charge, Counseling Cell
10
Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar In-Charge, Student Professional Activities Cell
11 Mr. Venkata swamy Administrative Officer
12 Dr. Neerajarani Chairman, Central Library
13 Anti-Ragging Dr. M. R. Shivakumar

List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various assigned jobs:
1.8.2014

register.
2. ANTI RAGGING COMMITTEE: (To Monitor in both in Morning & Evening)
Sl.
No.
1. Prof. R. R. Elangovan Vice Principal 9176602009
2. Mr. Sivasubramaniyam. R Asso Prof 9945535836
3. Dr.Senthil Kumaran.T Asso. Prof 8884000900
4 Mrs. Vanishree Moji Asst. Prof

Sl.
No.
1. Dr. Pillai. C.S Professor & HOD 9964144757
2. Mr. Shashikiran C.R Asst. Prof 9663856954
3. Mr. Vijay Mahantesh Asst. Prof 9845011148
3. DEDICATED CADRE OF WARDEN: Visit to Canteen, Campus, Classrooms, Hostel

Sl.
No.
1. Mr. S.B. Verma Hostel Warden 9900030927
4. PROFESSIONAL COUNSELOR: (Evening around 3 Pm) Visit to Canteen , Cam[pus,

Classrooms

Sl.
No.
2. Prof. R.R. Elangovan Professor 9176602009
3. Dr. Selvanandham. S Professor 8884451258
4. Dr. M. Eshwaramoorthy Professor 09887150218
statutory committee
1 Academic Dr. H.B. Phaniraju
2 Sports Dr. M. Eshwaramoorthy
4 Placement Mr. Shivakumar
5 Library Dr. Selvanandham. S
11 Drug Abuse Dr. B.N Ravikumar
13 Seminar Prof. R.R. Elangovan
14 Workshop Prof. R.R. Elangovan
15 Conference Prof. R.R. Elangovan

19 ISTE Dr. Mukesh

21 Alumni Association Mr. Dhanya Prakash R Babu
22 Media Co-ordinator Dr. T. Senthil Kumaran
26 Research Development Dr. M. Eshwaramoorthy
27 Project Exhibition Prof. R. Elangovan
29 NBA Mr. R. Siva subramanian
30 ISO DR. Muruganandham
Chairmans Vision
33
Energy Park
34 LIC/AICTE Coordinators Mr. Krishnakumar. A
35 Industry Institution Interaction Cell Mr. Yogi Adarsh
36 Red Cross Mr. Chandrashekhar B
Attendance/ Class Teaching of Individual Faculties
38 Every Class/ Student Progress
Communication
i) Cultural Club Mrs. Deepa
39 j) Heritage Club Ms. Prathibha
k) Sports Club Mr. R. Siva subramanian

l) Green Club Mrs. Gayathri Joshi

m) Creative Club Mr. Munikrishna D
n) Innovation Club Mrs. Surekha Nigudgi
o) Yoga Club Dr. C.S. Pillai
p) Cricket Club Mr. Manjunath Prasad

2 HODS 5,000
Sl. Name Position

No.
2 Dr. H.B. Phaniraju Principal
3 Prof. R.R. Elangovan Vice Principal( Administration)
4 Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar Vice-Principal
5 Dr. A. Muruganandham Head of Department Electronics & Communication
6 Dr. C.S. Pillai
Engineering
7 Mr. Dinakar Head of Department Electrical Engineering
8 Dr. Selvanandham Head of Department Basic Sciences
Mr. Dhanya Prakash. R.
9 In-Charge, Alumni Association
Babu
In-Charge, Workshop
10 Prof. R.R. Elangovan
11 Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar In-Charge, Student Professional Activities Cell
12 Mr. C.S. Rajagopalan Administrative Officer
13 Dr. Selvanandham. S Chairman, Central Library
14 Anti-Ragging DR. H.B. Phaniraju

List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various assigned jobs

1.8.2015
register.
6. ANTI RAGGING COMMITTEE: (To Monitor in both in Morning & Evening)
Sl.
No.
1. Prof. R. R. Elangovan Vice Principal 9176602009
2. Mr. Siva subramaniyam. R Asso Prof 9945535836
3. Dr.Senthil Kumaran.T Asso. Prof 8884000900

Sl.
No.
1. Dr. Pillai. C.S Professor & HOD 9964144757
2. Mr. Shashikiran C.R Asst.Prof 9663856954
3. Mr. Vijay Mahantesh Asst.Prof 9845011148
7. DEDICATED CADRE OF WARDEN: Visit to Canteen, Campus, Classrooms, Hostel

Sl.
No.
1. Mr. S.B. Verma Hostel Warden 9900030927

8. PROFESSIONAL COUNSELOR: (Evening around 3 Pm) Visit to Canteen , Cam[pus,

Classrooms
Sl.
No.
2. Prof. R.R. Elangovan Professor 9176602009
3. Dr. Selvanandham. S Professor 8884451258
4. Dr. M. Eshwaramoorthy Professor 09887150218
statutory committee
1 Academic Dr. M.S. Murali
2 Sports Dr. M. Eshwaramoorthy
4 Placement Mrs. Bhagyalakshmi .L
5 Library Dr. Selvanandham. S
11 Drug Abuse Dr. W. Prema Kumar
13 Seminar Prof. R.R. Elangovan
14 Workshop Prof. R.R. Elangovan
15 Conference Prof. R.R. Elangovan


19 ISTE Dr. Mukesh
21 Alumni Association Mr. Dhanya Prakash
22 Media Co-ordinator Dr. T. Senthil Kumaran
26 Research Development Dr. M. Eshwaramoorthy
27 Project Exhibition Prof. R. Elangovan
29 NBA Mr. R. Siva subramanian
30 ISO DR. Muruganandham
Chairmans Vision
33
Energy Park
34 LIC/AICTE Coordinators Mr. Krishnakumar. A
35 Industry Institution Interaction Cell Mr. Yogi Adarsh
36 Red Cross Mr. Chandrashekhar B
Attendance/ Class Teaching of Every Individual Faculties
38 Class/ Student Progress
Communication
39 q) Cultural Club Mrs. Deepa

r) Heritage Club Ms. Prathibha

s) Sports Club Mr. R. Siva subramanian
t) Green Club Ms. Vamsha Deepa N
u) Creative Club Dr. M. Punal Arabi
v) Innovation Club Mrs. Surekha Nigudgi
w) Yoga Club Dr. C.S. Pillai
x) Cricket Club Mr. Manjunath Prasad

2 HODS 5,000
List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various assigned jobs:
Sl. Name Position

No.
2 Dr. M.S. Murali Principal
3 Prof. R.R. Elangovan Vice Principal( Administration)
4 Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar Vice-Principal
5 Dr. A. Muruganandham Head of Department Electronics & Communication
6 Dr. C.S. Pillai
Engineering
7 Dr. S.S. Patil Head of Department Electrical Engineering
8 Dr. Selvanandham Head of Department Basic Sciences
9 Mr. Dhanya Prakash. R. Babu In-Charge, Alumni Association
In-Charge, Workshop
10 Prof. R.R. Elangovan

11 Mr. A.M. Prasanna Kumar In-Charge, Student Professional Activities Cell \

12 Mr. C.S. Rajagopalan Administrative Officer
13 Dr. Selvanandham. S Chairman, Central Library
14 Anti-Ragging Dr. M.S. Murali
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, & Public Accounting at Institute Level
For CFY
Total No. of
Total Income Actual expenditure (till 31/10/2015)
students:
Fee Govt. Grant(s) Other Recurring Non- Special Expenditure per
Sources including recurring projects/Any student (Oct -15)
(specify) Salaries other,
specify
710 NIL NIL 533.33 - 0.48
Note: Similar tables are to be prepared for CFYm1, CFm2 & CFYm3.

Actual Actual Actual

Actual
expenses Budgeted expenses Budgeted expenses
Budgeted expenses in Budgeted in
Items in CFY in in in in
in CFY CFYm2 CFYm3
(till Oct CFYm1 CFYm1 CFYm2 CFYm3
(13-14)
-15) (14-15) (12-13)
Infrastructure
Built-up 160.00 75.27 110.00 104.41 110.00 111.61 200.00 143.66
Library 10.00 5.33 25.00 22.16 5.00 2.99 25.00 21.88
Laboratory
equipment 25.00 13.59 70.00 67.75 40.00 39.90 80.00 70.50
Laboratory
consumables 5.00 1.13 50.00 46.08 5.00 2.71 4.00 1.16
Teaching and
non-teaching
staff salary 500.00 257.75 400.00 422.56 350.00 303.54 300.00 253.65
Maintenance
and spares
25.00 11.36 30.00 26.54 30.00 27.49 30.00 25.95
R&D 45.00 19.39 5.00 3.43 3.00 1.00 5.00 3.99
Training and
Travel 15.00 1.86 10.00 7.72 10.00 7.08 4.00 2.67
Miscellaneous
expenses* 2.00 0.6 2.00 1.15 2.00 0.42 2.00 0.60
Others, specify
400.00 147.05 400.00 320.42 400.00 343.51 400.00 312.94
Total
1187.00 533.33 1102.00 1022.22 955.00 840.25 1050.00 837.00

Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3
CFY: Current FinancialYear, CFYm1 (Current Financial Year minus 1, CFYm2 (Current Financial Year minus 2) and
CFYm3 (Current Financial Year minus 3)
For CFY
Total No. of
Total Income (14-15) Actual expenditure (14-15)
students:
Fee Govt. Grant(s) Other Sources (specify) Recurring including Non- Special Expenditure
Salaries recurring projects/Any per student
other,
specify
802.59 NIL NIL 1.06 827.18 - 0.81

For CFY
Total No. of
students:
other,
specify
651.65 NIL NIL 2.02 492.65 - 0.47
For CFY
Total No. of
students:
other,
specify
460.65 NIL NIL 4.72 388.20 - 0.57

ACS College of Engineering

Department of CSE
SUMMARY OF BUDGET ALLOCATION & UTILIZATION (2012-17)
S.No ITEM 2016-17 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14

Budget Expense Budget Expense Budget Expense Budget Expense
1 Lab equipments/Internet 705238.1 750000 732500 984500 891499.99 490000 350000
2 Software 500000 500000 496924.35 500000 496924.35 547000 496924.35

R & D / E-Journal/
3 Books 300000 175000 156128.1 275000 252127.28 100000 96736.57
4 Lab Consumables 10000 5500 5230 6000 5200 6000 5075
5 Maintenance and spares 25000 3000 2000 31750 28850 3350 3000
6 Training and Travel 200000 68035 64613 57975 53909 198525 184515
7 Miscellaneous Exp. 60000 51450 46738.7 64100 58253.1 45600 41448.5
TOTAL AMOUNT 1800238.1 1552985 1504134.2 1919325 1786763.7 1390475 1177699.42

10.4 Library and Internet:
Carpet area of library (in m2) 600 sq ft

Reading space (in m2) 600 sq ft
Number of seats in reading space 148
Number of users (issue book) per day 40
Number of users (reading space) per day 50
Timings: During working day, weekend, and

8:30am to 8:00 pm
Vacation
Number of library staff 03
Number of library staff with a degree in Library 01
Library Management 01
Computerization for search, indexing Yes
Issue/return records bar coding used Yes

Library services on Internet/Intranet INDEST or other similar
Yes
membership archives

10.5.2 Titles and volumes per title (4)

Number of titles: 6144
Number of volumes: 27984
Number of new Number of new Number of new

titles added editions added volumes added
2011-2012 498 94 14699
2012-2013 351 87 17553
2013-2014 161 38 18699
2014-15 314 104 2303
Scholarly journal (3)
Details 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11
As soft copy 7 - - - -
Engg. and Tech.
As hard copy 109 101 101 101 101
Digital Library (3)

Availability of digital library content:
If available, mention number of courses, number of e-books, etc. : 09
Availability of an exclusive server : Yes
Availability over Intranet/Internet : Yes

Availability of exclusive space/room : Yes

Number of users per day : 15
Library expenditure on books, magazines/journals, and miscellaneous content (5)
Expenditure
Magazines/journals Magazines/journals Comments
Year Misc.
Books ( for hard copy ( for soft copy if any
content
subscription) subscription )
2010-2011 232635 47013 323510 - -
2011-2012 692317 258201 386750 - -
2012-2013 504130 269670 1579032 - -
2013-2014 130693 261181 1579032
2014-2015 66575 273655 1308022

INTERNET (5)
Name of the Internet provider Railtel
Available bandwidth 60Mbps
Availability of Internet in an exclusive lab Yes
Availability in most computing lab Yes
Availability in Departments and other units Yes
Availability in Faculty rooms Yes
Institute own e-mail facility to faculty/students Yes
Security/privacy of e-mail/internet users Yes



Cse Sar

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cse Sar

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Part A: Institutional Information

1. Name and Address of the Institution:

ACS College of Engineering

207, Kambipura, Mysore Road,

2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:

Visvesvaraya Technological University,

3. Year of Establishment of the Institution:

Institute of national Importance

Any other (Please specify)

CSE Self Assessment Report

Any Other (Please specify)

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:

RajaRajeswari Medical College & Hospital 2004-05 MBBS, MD, MS Bangalore

RajaRajeswari Dental College & Hospital 1991-92 BDS, MDS Bangalore

RajaRajeswari College of Engineering 2006-07 BE, M.Tech, Ph.D Bangalore

Note: Add rows as needed.

CSE Self Assessment Report

1. B.E- Computer Applied

2. B.E-Civil 2009-10 F.No.06/06/KTK Applied

4. B.E-Mechanical 2009-10 Applied

5. B.E-Aeronautical 2010-11 60 No No F.No.South- Not Eligible

F.No.South- Not Eligible

CSE Self Assessment Report

M.Tech Digital 1-2017625631

* Write applicable one:

Applying first time

Granted accreditation for 5 years for the period (specify period)

Not accredited (specify visit dates, year)

Withdrawn (specify visit dates, year)

Not eligible for accreditation

Eligible but not applied

Note: Add rows as needed.

8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application

S. No. Program Name

1. B.E- Computer Science & Engineering

2. B.E- Civil Engineering

3. B.E- Electronics & Communication Engineering

4. B.E- Mechanical Engineering

CSE Self Assessment Report

9. Total number of employees:

A. Regular* Employees (Faculty and Staff):

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Faculty in Maths, Science & M 9 9 9 9 13 13

CAY: Current Assessment Year (July June: completed)

CAYm1: Current Assessment Year minus 1

CSE Self Assessment Report

CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Faculty in Maths, Science & M

10. Total number of Engineering Students:

Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Total no. of boys 211 170 178

Total no. of girls 87 110 87

Total no. of students 298 280 265

11. Vision of the Institution:

CSE Self Assessment Report

12. Mission of the Institution:

Mobile No: +91-9900028024

Email Id: principal@acsce.edu.in

NBA coordinator, if designated:

Name: R.Siva subramaniyam

Designation: Associate Professor

Mobile No: 9945535836