Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ByCarloLini,PE
ThepryingcheckprocedurepresentedinPart9ofthe14thEditionoftheAISCSteelConstructionManual
canbeintimidatingforfirsttimeorinfrequentusers.Therearemanyvariablesandequations,andthe
controllinglimitstatemaynotalwaysbeobvious.Forthosewhohavestruggledwiththisprocedure,this
paperpresentsadifferentwaytothinkaboutpryingandwillhopefullyprovideabetterunderstanding
ofthepryingchecksinPart9.
SettingtheGroundRules
First,theassumptionsmustbedefined.Thispaperadopts Fatigue
themodeldescribedinPart9oftheManual.Thismeans Tensilefatigueinboltsisbestavoidedby
thatthepaperconsidersonlytheultimatestrengthofthe configuringjointssuchthattheboltsresist
connectionandassumesfatigueisnotaconsideration.The onlyshear.
modelrepresentsalowerboundsolution,whichby ThoughAppendix3oftheSpecification
definitionpredictsastrengththatislessthanoratmost addressessnugtightconditions,
equaltotheactualstrengthoftheconnectionatultimate pretensioningisencouragedandgreatly
loads.Itisbasedonasetofforcesthatsatisfies enhancesfatiguebehavior.
equilibrium.Allapplicablelimitstatesaresatisfiedforthe Beamendshearconnectionsshouldbe
flexibletoallowrotationandprevent
forcesassumedinthemodel,andweknowbasedontests
prying(Wilson,1940).
thatitcansafelybeassumedthattheconnectionhas
TheAISCandRCSCSpecificationsaddress
sufficientductilitytoaccommodatemodel.
tensilefatigueinboltssomewhat
Themodeldoesnotconsiderthebehaviorofthe differently,butbothrequireaccounting
forprying.
connectionasitreachestheforcedistributionassumedto
AASTOprovidesasimplifiedand
existatultimateloads;itisnotanelasticmodel.Pryingcan
conservativecalculationtoestimate
increasethestressrangethatmustbeconsideredunder
prying.
fatigueloading,aconsiderationthatisbeyondthescopeof Thecalculationofthepryingforce,q,in
thispaper. theManualisnotappropriatefor
evaluatingfatigue.
Theboltforceisshownasbeingappliedattheedgeofthe
bolthole(Figure1).Thisadjustmentbringsthetheoreticalandexperimentalresultsclosertogether
(Kulaketal.,1987).
PryingforStrength
Pryingmaymistakenlybeviewedasaflawinaconnectionalimitstatethatweakenstheconnection
buttheoppositeisactuallytrue.Asstatedonpage911ofthe14thEditionManual:Alternatively,itis
usuallypossibletodeterminealesserrequiredthicknessbydesigningtheconnectingelementand
boltedjointfortheactualeffectsofpryingactionwithqgreaterthanzero.Onecanviewpryingasa
waytoincreasethestrengthofaconnectioni.e.,athinnerpartwithpryingcanhavethesame
strengthasathickerpartwithoutprying.
TheStren
ngthofthePlatewithoutP
Prying
Beforege
ettingintohow
wpryingincreeasesthestre
engthofthecconnection,leetsexaminethecondition
n
withoutp
pryingandhowwitishandle
edintheMannual.
Manualcalculaatestheminimumthickneessrequiredttoeliminatep
Equation920intheM pryingaction:
(ManualEq.920)
eLRFDformulation,andth
Thisisthe hecheckassuresthatthefflexuralstrengthoftheangleleg(Figurre1)
isnotexceeded.Wecaanalsothinkofthiscondittionasacant ileveredbeam
mwithalenggthbasideallized
2.
inFigure2
TheMomeentArm
Figure1sshowsamomeentarmmeasu uredfromtheccenter
oflegtottheedgeoftheebolthole.Thisisconsistenttwith
themodeelassumedforanglesintheM Manual.
Forteesaandwideflanggeshapes,themomentarmiis
generally
ymeasuredfromthefaceofttheweb.
TheFebruuary2015SteeelInterchange(availableat
www.mo dernsteel.com m)providesfurttherdiscussion n.
Angleloadedintensionwithoutpryingg.
Figure1:A
TheEffecctiveWidth
Figure2:W
Withoutpryin
ng,viewedassacantileverbeam. Theeffeectivewidth,p
p,canbe
conservvativelytakenaas3.5bbutcannnot
exceedthespacingbeetweenthebo olts.
Largereeffectivewidth
hscanbejustiffied
throughhrationalanalyysis.TheManu ual
provideesfurtherguidaance.
Theavailableflexuralstrengthoftheanglelegneartheheeloftheangleisequalto
(Eq.1)
wherepisequaltothetributarywidthandtisequaltheanglethickness.
Themomentatthislocationisequalto
(Eq.2)
SettingMuequaltoMwoandsolvingforTworesultsin
(Eq.3)
Tworeferstotheamountofloadthatcanbeappliedtotheanglebeforecreatingaplastichingenearthe
heeloftheangle.NotethatonecansubstituteEq.2intoEq.1andsolvefortherequiredthickness,t,
whichwouldresultinthesameexpressionasManualEq.920presentedearlier.Thiscanbeviewedas
theminimumthicknessrequiredtoprovidesufficientstrengthwithouthavingtoaccountforpryingand
theadditionalstrengththatresultfromprying.Forcaseswheretheappliedload,T,islessthanTwo,the
calculatedinManualEq.929islessthan0.Thisisequivalenttotbeinglessthantmin.
AdditionalStrengthofthePlatewithPrying
Itmightbepossibletosqueezemorestrengthfromtheconnectionifamorecomplexmodelischosen.
Pryingactioncanbeaccountedfor.Asmentionedpreviously,thecasewithoutpryingcanbeenvisioned
asacantileverbeam.Toaccountfortheadditionalstrengthfromprying,amodel,asshowninFigure3,
canbeused.Theadditionofahingeattheboltlineincreasestheflexuralstrengthoftheflange(which
mightbeintuitivelysurmised).Recognizingadditionalrestraintthatwaspreviouslyignoredcannot
weakenthesystem.Thisisinfactacorollarytothelowerboundtheorem.
CantileverModeel
Nootethatthestrrengthgainshoownfromconssideringpryingg
isssuperimposed ontothestren ngthwithoutp
pryingcase(seee
Eq.11).Thatisw
whynomomen ntisshownatthecantilever
endinFigure3a nd4.Sinceth
hecasewithouttprying
deevelopstheflexxuralstrengthneartheangleeheel,no
additionalmomeentcanbetakeenatthislocattion.
Figure3:Pryingcontrributionview
wedasacantilleverresultin gfromthefo
orcesattheb
boltandangleetoe
lo
ocations,form
mingamomeentcouple.
Thisaddittionalcantilevversupportwwouldpreventtthefailurem
modedepicteedinFigure1and2i.e.,w we
aregoingfromamode elthatallowsonlyoneplasstichingetooonethatallow
wstwoplastichingestofo orm.
Anadditioonalflexurecchecknearthe eboltlinecan
nbemadetoodeterminethestrengthin ncreaseduettothe
presenceofthesecond dplastichinge(Figure4a)..Thisnewmoodelrequiresanadditionaalforce,q,to
maintainequilibrium.TTheTpryingtermcansimplyybevieweda stheaddition nalstrengthggainedfromttaking
pryingintoaccount.Th hatis,thetotalstrengthofftheconnecttion,T,woulddbeT=Two+TTprying.
a.) Tprying_flexure
p limiitedbyflexurralyieldinglim
mitstateatbooltholelocation.b.)Tpryinng_boltlimitedb
by
bolttensionru upturelimitsttate.
Figuure4:Pryingcontribution limitstates.
Theflexurelimitstatelooksatbendingalongtheboltline.Thischeckcanbeexpressedasfollows:
(Eq.4)
Where 1
16
Equation4issimilartoEquation1excepttheplatewidththatischeckedisadjustedtoaccountforthe
materialremovedtoaccountforthebolthole.SimilartoEquation3,wecansaythatthemaximum
additionalpryingforcebasedontheflexurelimitstate,Tprying_flexure,isequalto
_ (Eq.5)
BoltTensionRuptureLimitState
Whetherornotpryingisaccountedfor,theforceontheboltcannotexceedtheavailabletensilerupture
strengthofthebolt.Fortheconditionwithoutprying,theforceontheboltissimplytheappliedtension
perbolt.Fortheconditionwithprying,theforceontheboltistheappliedtensionperboltplusthe
pryingforce,q.
FromFigure4b,basedonsumoftheforcesequalingzerointheydirection,wecansaytheadditional
forceontheboltduetopryingisequaltoTprying_bolt+qb.Bysolvingforthesumofthemomentsaboutthe
holelocation,wecandeterminethevalueforqb:
_
(Eq.6)
Fromthecasewithoutprying,wealreadyhavealoadontheboltequaltoTwo(Figure1).Asshownin
Figure4,themaximumadditionalloadthatcanbeplacedontheboltwouldhavetobelessthanthe
boltcapacity,B,minustheexistingloadontheboltwithoutprying,Two.
_ (Eq.7)
CombiningEquations6and7resultsinthefollowingexpression:
_
_ (Eq.8)
SimplifyingEquation8yields
_ 1 (Eq.9)
SolvingforTprying_bolt,themaximumadditionalforcethatcanbeaddedtotheanglebasedonthebolt
limitstateisequalto
_ (Eq.10)
OverallCo
onnectionStrengthwithP Prying
(Eq.11)
_
(Eq
q.12)
_
SimilartoEquation(928)intheMa
anual,ifonew
wantstosolvvefortheactu
ualpryingforrceintheboltt,q,
thefollow
wingequationncanbeused:
(Eq.13
3)
Exampless
Thefollow
wingexample
escompareth heresultsfrom
mtheproceddureinPart9tothoseobtainedusingthe
approachdiscussedinthisarticle.
Example11
Given:
p=3in
B=27.5kips
Usethee equationsinPPart9ofthe14thEditionM
Manualto
solveforthefollowinggvariables:
b=17/116in
a=23/88in
d=13/116in
ArticleApproach ManualProcedure
WithoutPryingCheck
CheckBoltTensileStrengthwithoutPrying CheckBoltTensileStrengthwithoutPrying
Tu=5kips<B=27.5kips Tu=5kips<B=27.5kips
CalculateTwo Calculatetmintoeliminateprying
Eq.1: 0.9 58 ManualEq.920a: =0.43in>3/8in
5.51 ConsiderPrying
.
Eq.3: 3.83kips<5kips
ConsiderPrying
ArticleAp pproach MannualProcedurre
ConsiderPryying
Eq.4: 0.9 58 MannualEq.924:=0.73
4.01 MannualEq.926:=0.61
.
Eq.5: _ 2.79kips MannualEq.935:=5.28
CheckBolltTensileStre
engthforPrying >1.UseEquation934
. .
Eq.10: _
14.7 MannualEq.934:Q=0.24
2.79
Eq.12: MannualEq.931:Tavail=6.62
2kips
14.7
>5kips.Conn
6.62kips> nectionisadeequate.
Note:When>1,the eManualstattesthatthefiittinghasinsuufficientstren
ngthtodevelopthefullboolt.
Thismakeessensesinceethepryingccontributionisslimitedbyt heflexurelim
mitstateatth
heboltholes.
Example22
Given:
p=3in
B=27.5kips
Usethee equationsinPPart9ofthe14thEditionM
Manualto
solveforthefollowinggvariables:
b=11/44in
a=23/88in
d=13/116in
ArticleApproach ManualProcedure
WithoutPryingCheck
CheckBoltTensileStrengthwithoutPrying CheckBoltTensileStrengthwithoutPrying
Tu=20kips<B=27.5kips Tu=20kips<B=27.5kips
CalculateTwo Calculatetmintoeliminateprying
Eq.1: 0.9 58 ManualEq.920a: =0.80in>3/4in
22.0 ConsiderPrying
.
Eq.3: 17.6kips<20kips
ConsiderPrying
ConsiderPrying
FlexureLimitStateatBoltHole ManualEq.930a:tc=0.94
Eq.4: 0.9 58 ManualEq.924:=0.73
16.1 ManualEq.926:=0.53
.
Eq.5: _ 12.9kips ManualEq.935:=0.5
CheckBoltTensileStrengthforPrying 0<1.UseEquation933
. .
Eq.10: _
6.49 ManualEq.933:Q=0.876
12.9
Eq.12: ManualEq.931:Tavail=24.1kips
6.49
24.1kips>20kips.Connectionisadequate.
Note:When01,themanualstatesthatthefittinghassufficientstrengthtodevelopthefullbolt,
butinsufficientstiffnesstopreventpryingaction.Thismakessensesincethepryingcontributionis
limitedbythebolttensionrupturelimit
Example1Revisited
ThisexamplelooksatExample1inthemoretraditionallimitstatechecksformat.
BoltTensileStrengthwithoutPrying
Tu=5kips<B=27.5kipsBoltCheckOK
CheckFlexuralYieldingatAngleLegNearHeel
Eq.2: 5 1 7 16 =7.19kipin
Pryingneedstobeconsidered.
Eq.3: 3.83
Anglecanonlytransfer3.83kipswithoutprying.Checktoseeifangleisadequatetotransferthe
remainingloadperthetwopryinglimitstates.Theremainingloadisequalto5kips3.83kips=1.17
kips.
CheckFlexuralYieldingatBoltHole
1.17 1 7 16 1.68
CheckBoltTensileStrengthwithPrying
.
Eq.13: 0.71kips
Forceonbolt=5kips+0.71kips=5.71kips<27.5kipsBoltCheckOK
Connectionisadequate.
ReferencedandUsefulDocuments
AISC(2010a),SpecificationforStructuralSteelBuildings,ANSI/AISC36010,AmericanInstituteof
SteelConstruction,Chicago,IL.
AISC(2010b),SteelConstructionManual,14thEd.,AmericanInstituteofSteelConstruction,
Chicago,IL.
AISC(2014),SteelInterchange,ModernSteelConstruction,February,AmericanInstituteof
SteelConstruction,Chicago,IL.
Fisher,J.W.,Kulak,G.L.andSmith,I.F.C.(1998),AFatiguePrimerforStructuralEngineers,
NSBA/AISC,Chicago,IL.
Kulak,G.L.,Fisher,J.W.andStruik,J.H.A.(1987),GuidetoDesignCriteriaforBoltedandRiveted
Joints,2ndEd.,JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,NewYork,NY.
RCSC(2009),SpecificationforStructuralJointsUsingHighStrengthBolts,ResearchCouncilon
StructuralConnections,AmericanInstituteofSteelConstruction,Chicago,IL.
Thornton,W.A.(1985),PryingActionaGeneralTreatment,EngineeringJournal,Second
Quarter,AmericanInstituteofSteelConstruction,Chicago,IL.
Wilson,W.M.(1940),DesignofConnectionAnglesforStringersofRailwayBridges.Proc.,
AREA,41,889903.
AnabbreviatedversionofthispaperappearsastheJuly2016SteelWisearticleAQuickLookatPrying,
availableatwww.modernsteel.com.
CarloLini(lini@aisc.org)isanadvisorinAISCsSteelSolutionsCenter.