7 views

Uploaded by pedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com

welding dissimilar tube

- ANALYSIS OF MANUAL WELDING PROCESSES ADOPTED IN FABRICATION OF SEATING BENCHES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SOLAPUR CITY
- The Prediction of the Temperature Distribution and Weld Pool Geometry in the Gas Metal Arc Welding Process
- 5332-0
- IRB 1600
- pqr
- HeatSourceGeometry En
- Fm-ti-020_rev.0 Inspection Report Ultrasonic Examination (Aws d1.1).Eff.161028
- resume1
- thermo1(20162)
- or assignment 5
- NB-T 47003.1-2009 钢制焊接常压容器
- He Attemp Unit
- Heat Definition
- Quali Met
- PBL - Heat Energy
- mass vs temperature lab template es
- CT Calculations
- Term Odin a Mica
- Tools and Consumables Welder Qualification Test
- Nicrofer6030 Alloy 690 e

You are on page 1of 7

of Dissimilar Tubes

A reduced thermal model is developed that accurately captures joint temperatures

and provides guidance in weld parameter development

ABSTRACT. The transient thermal re- and the temperature profile in the region model is, however, sufficiently accurate

sponse in inertia welding is difficult to near the weld can have a significant im- to be used as a reduced-order thermal

capture analytically. Heat is generally pact on flash formation, heat-affected model for process optimization and pa-

dissipated over time scales of less than zones, and joint strength. Cooling rates rameter development in the inertia weld-

one second, an order of magnitude faster are closely related to joint temperature ing of tubes. A more accurate truth

than direct-drive friction welding. The profiles and they directly influence the model, such as a finite element model,

present work critically examines the na- residual stress state developed in the can then be used to further examine a

ture of the heat generation term through joint. The issue of residual stress becomes more limited set of interesting parameters

an analysis of experimental data. The more significant in dissimilar material and quantify flash evolution and residual

method presented here determines the joints. It is therefore desirable to have a stress formation.

heat generation term for the inertia weld- means of rapidly and accurately estimat- The first published analytical solution

ing of dissimilar tubes (tube thickness ing peak joint temperatures and cooling to the transient thermal history during fric-

small in comparison to radius so that ra- rates based on input parameters and rou- tion welding is generally attributed to

dial effects are neglected) solely based on tinely gathered inertia welding machine Rykalin, et al. (Ref. 1), although several of

m a ch i n e - g e n e rated data, namely the performance data. the same era researchers from the former

curve of angular speed vs. time and the The present model offers such esti- Soviet Union also discussed heat input

magnitude of material burnoff. A simple mates based on an analytical solution during friction welding (Refs. 24). The

approach to determining the heat alloca- and two proposed parametric represen- mathematics upon which this analytical

tion to both sides of the dissimilar joint is tations of the heat generation term. The solution is based appears, among other

proposed, and the resulting thermal model presented here is specifically for places, in the work of Carlslaw and Jaeger

problem is solved using an analytical tubular cross sections, and the analytical (Ref. 5). The model assumptions are semi-

method. The predictions are compared to models assume constant, but tempera- infinite solid; constant flux at the free sur-

actual thermocouple data from welds ture-averaged, material properties. The face for time th, then flux is turned off;

conducted under identical conditions, only required inputs are the measured zero initial temperature; and constant ma-

and are shown to be in good agreement. decay of the rotational speed, the mo- terial properties. The solution is given by

Although the method proposed in this ment of inertia of the flywheel, the total the following equation (Refs. 1, 5):

work does not replace more accurate nu- burnoff or reduction in length due to

merical analyses, it does provide guid- flash, and an assessment (or assumption) for 0 t th :

ance in weld parameter development. of how the burnoff is divided between the at x 2

This is demonstrated through the model- two tubes. p exp 4at

based scaling of weld parameters for dis- It is not the intent of this work to sup- 2q

T = o

similar tube welds over a range of tube plant more detailed numerical analyses k

diameters. of the inertia welding process, which are x erfc x

2 at

important in determining such mechani- 2

Introduction cal aspects of the process as residual

2q x

stress and flash formation. The present = o t ierfc

Previous Thermal Models of Friction

k 2 t

and Inertia Welding for x > t h :

In industrial friction and inertia weld-

ing production situations, it is not always t ierfc x

KEY WORDS 2 t

possible to conduct extensive instru-

2qo

(t th )

mented testing during which temperature

Inertia Welding T = (1)

data are gathered. Peak joint temperature

Friction Welding k

Thermal Models

ierfc x

V. R. DAV and M. J. COLA are with the Ma- Dissimilar Tubes

2 (t th )

terials Science and Technology Div., Los Reduced Order Model

Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, Weld Parameters

N.Mex. G. N. A. HUSSEN is with the Mate- where k is the thermal conductivity, is

rials Science and Engineering Dept., Stanford the thermal diffusivity, x is the distance

University, Palo Alto, Calif.

Dave Supplement for 10/01 9/27/01 9:33 AM Page 247

from the weld interface, and qo is the dicted temperature distribution on the have produced a series of finite differ-

magnitude of the surface heat flux. total welding time. This total welding ence models. Weiss (Ref. 19) has also in-

The next significant contribution was time is a function of all the main process vestigated the residual stresses after

made by Cheng (Refs. 6, 7), who analyzed variables: initial rotational speed, thrust welding using the FEA approach. Fu and

both similar and dissimilar tubular joint pressure, moment of inertia, etc. Their Duan (Ref. 20) have more recently used

configurations. Cheng numerically solved model has good qualitative agreement the FEA approach to model the axial

the differential equation of heat conduc- with measured temperature values. pressure distribution in addition to the

tion (see Equation 2, which follows) with Johnson, et al. (Ref. 11), have also temperature field.

appropriate boundary conditions, and also noted the power dissipation curve for in- As mentioned earlier, this work is a re-

allowed the material properties to vary ertia welding is very different than that for duced order model of the inertia welding

with temperature (Ref. 6): friction welding. They have suggested a process. It is motivated by the need to

two-part curve: Stage I, corresponding to have simple, yet realistic, models that can

T T 1 T a more concentrated initial contact and be used for in-situ process monitoring and

+ U(t ) = k Stage II, a slower (relatively slower) control and for rapid parameter develop-

t x CP x x decay. They proposed the following func- ment and validation. It differs from previ-

P

CpA ( )

T4 To4

hP

Cp A

(T To ) (2) tional forms: ous works in that it attempts to more ac-

curately capture heat generation during

Stage I :q (t ) = qmax sin( t ) welding as a function of time by using

where A is the cross-sectional area, T o is data routinely gathered by the inertia

the ambient temperature surrounding the k Cp welding machine. This data is directly

tube, P is the outer perimeter of the tube, Stage II :q (t ) = Tmax (3) used as an input to the thermal simula-

t

Cp is the specific heat, is the density, h tion, which in this case is a reduced-order

is the film coefficient of heat transfer where qmax is the maximum power dissi- analytical model of heat conduction. As

(convective cooling), U(t) is the velocity pation and Tmax is the maximum interface such, this approach could also be used

of the melt front, is the emissivity, and temperature attained Fig. 1. A more re- with more sophisticated models for heat

is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. cent multistage thermal model for direct- transfer, and would provide a reasonable

Cheng allowed for the existence of a melt drive friction welding was developed by estimate of heat generation without hav-

layer by incorporating a moving bound- Midling and Grong (Ref. 12), who pro- ing to explicitly model the combined

ary term. Several experimental studies posed various analytical forms for the thermomechanical problem. Also, this

have refuted the notion of melting during heating stage, steady-state condition, and approach is amenable to an on-line mon-

friction welding, such as the work of cooling stage based on continuous pla- itoring strategy that flags potentially de-

Weiss and Hazlett (Ref. 8), and this topic nar disc sources at the weld interface. fective welds in critical components and

will be revisited later in the present work. There are numerous finite element has the potential to alleviate the inspec-

As Wang (Ref. 9) pointed out, it is quite and finite difference models on both con- tion burden by reducing it to inspection

likely that softened material at tempera- ventional friction and inertia welding. for cause as opposed to inspecting every

tures near the melting point will be ex- These modeling efforts account for the component.

pelled as flash before melting can occur. heat generation term by examining the

Wang and Nagappan (Ref. 10) per- coupled thermomechanical problem to- Equipment and

formed a thermal analysis similar to that gether with an interfacial friction law. Experimental Procedure

of Cheng but for the inertia welding of This interfacial friction law or constitutive

steel bars. Their predictions showed the relation must account for frictional heat- The commercially pure niobium and

peak temperature to be less than the ing. Sluzalec (Refs. 13, 14) was one of the 316L stainless steel utilized in this study

melting point and that for inertia weld- first to use the finite element analysis were in the form of 1 in.-diameter tubes.

ing, the peak temperatures are achieved (FEA) approach for friction welding, and The Nb tube wall thickness was slightly

very quickly as compared to conven- Moal, et al. (Refs. 15, 16), have devel- thicker (0.125-in.) than the 316L tube

tional friction welding. Additionally, they oped an FEA model specifically for iner- wall (0.08 in.) to provide for greater forg-

noted a strong dependence of the pre- tia welding. Sahin, et al. (Refs. 17, 18), ing action during the upset stage. Prior to

al. (Ref. 11).

Fig. 2 Schematic showing thermocouple placement.

Dave Supplement for 10/01 9/27/01 9:34 AM Page 248

the tube and extending along its axis to ification of Wang and Nagappans treat-

0.120 in. Fig. 2. The data acquisition ment, and a second approach based

system was a National Instruments Board purely on energy considerations. The first

Model AT-MIO-16-10 connected to a approach starts with Equation 5 and ig-

Pentium-class computer running Lab- nores radial variations on account of the

view SCXI 1120 software set at a gain of thin-walled nature of the tubular sections

20. A 10-kHz filter was used to record being joined. Furthermore, heat genera-

seven channels of thermocouple data at tion at the interface is apportioned to

200 Hz and store it for off-line analysis. each material according to the expres-

Based on a thermocouple rise time analy- sion that applies to heat generation in an

sis conducted by Sawada and Nishiwaki infinite composite solid (Ref. 5):

(Ref. 21), it is expected the thermocouple

rise time could range from 10 to 50 ms, Q1 + Q 2 = Q total

but is certainly expected to be less than

100 ms. The total bond time was less than Q1 k 1 2 k1 1 C1

0.25 s for the welds made in this study, so = = (6)

Q 2 k2 1 k 2 2 C 2

the thermocouple may underestimate the

peak temperature by, at most, 6% (as- The speed curve was modeled by the

suming 50-ms rise time and peak tem- following empirical relationship:

perature of ~1000C occurring 0.1 s after t

Fig. 3 Macrosection of the as-welded nio- n

the start of the bond). Data was sampled (t ) = o exp m

bium-to-stainless steel joint. (7)

from the start of the weld cycle until the

weld had cooled below 260C. A macro-

section of a completed weld between where m and n are constants, and the

inertia welding, the tubes were sectioned niobium and stainless is shown in Fig. 3. characteristic time is defined as the time

into 3-in. lengths and the faying surfaces required for the rotational speed to decay

were machined while flood cooled in The Heat Generation Term to 10% of its original value at the start of

isopropyl alcohol. Derived Directly from the weld. The data in Fig. 4 shows the ac-

Inertia welds were produced using an Machine Measurements tual speed curve from a weld and the em-

MTI Model 90B inertia welding system. pirical form chosen to represent it. For the

Initial emphasis was placed on determin- Rykalin, et al. (Ref. 1), have deter- case shown here, normalized speed

ing parameters capable of producing joints mined the heat input during friction [(t)/o] is shown vs. time. The weld con-

that could sustain bending through 90 deg. welding is given by the following: ditions were o = 1488 rpm; Io = 5.19

Once suitable starting parameters were de- q(t ) = const. p r (t ) (4) lbm-ft2; P = 8330 lbf. The nonlinear, least-

veloped, welds were made at a surface ve- squares-fit parameters are m = 2.931 and

locity of 393 ft/min and axial force of Wang and Nagappan (Ref. 10) as- n = 1.718. The heat input is then assumed

8330 lbf while maintaining a constant mo- sumed the product of the friction coeffi- to have the following form:

ment of inertia of 5.19 lbm-ft2. After weld- cient and the normal pressure p re- Q( t) = A o (t ) (8)

ing, and prior to testing, each joint was He mains a constant. By using this

leak checked, achieving a minimum leak assumption an empirical fit to the an- where Q is the total heat input in watts,

rate of 1x1010 atm.-cc/s. gular speed curve and a heat balance is the speed curve as represented by

Thermal cycle data were recorded by they were able to derive an expression for Equation 7, and Ao is a constant. The con-

attaching 0.010-in.-diameter Type K the heat generation of the following form: stant is evaluated based on conservation

(Chromel-Alumel) thermocouples to the

q(t ) = const.r (t ) (5) of energy. Before this can be done, it is

outside of the stainless steel tube. Seven recognized that some of the energy avail-

thermocouples were attached in 0.020- The present work takes two ap- able to the joint from the flywheel will be

in. increments starting at the joint end of proaches to modeling heat input: a mod- used to heat and expel flash. Therefore,

Fig. 4 The angular speed curve as modeled empirically by Equa- Fig. 5 Comparison between predicted and actual thermal pro-

tion 7. files on the stainless side of the weld.

Dave Supplement for 10/01 9/27/01 9:34 AM Page 249

Fig. 6 Error as defined by Equation 14 shown as a function of Fig. 7 The effect of variations in thermomechanical properties

time for Models 1 and 2. on model predictions.

the effective energy conducted into the The second method of determining The thermal profiles can now be eval-

workpiece will be less than the initial en- the heat flux involves direct considera- uated with the aid of Duhamels theorem,

ergy of the flywheel. The approach taken tion of the dissipation of rotational ki- as applied to the case of 1-D heat con-

in this work was to examine the joint after netic energy by the weld. For any given duction in a semi-infinite solid with a

the weld and make a determination as to time during the weld, it can be generally time-varying flux at the free surface, as

the amount of material expelled from said the following expression relates the follows:

1 t

T(x,t ) = q(t )

each side. For example, in the case of dis- energy dissipated by the weld to the loss

similar welds between Nb and 316L in kinetic energy of the flywheel: k 0

stainless, the flash was expelled almost

E weld (t ) =

1

[ ]

I I (t )

1 2

entirely in the Nb. The inertia welding

2

1(1) x 2 d

2O O 2O exp (15)

machine tracks the reduction in length 4

during the weld, and, therefore, it is pos- Therefore, it is immediately observed that

sible to know the burnoff directly from the power dissipation in the weld is given where q(t) is the time-varying surface

machine measurements. Then it is as- by the following: flux.

sumed the flash carries off an amount of The heat flux q is easily derived from

Q( t) = IO(t )

d

energy equal to (12) the expressions for total power shown in

dt Equations 8 and 13 by considering the

E flash = B AC C TMAX (9)

This ignores stored elastic energy in the cross-sectional area and the fraction of

where B is the total reduction in length, tooling or inertia welding machine and energy entering into a particular side of

or burnoff; A C is the cross-sectional area also ignores other energy losses such as the joint, as follows:

of the tube; is the density; C is the av- machine friction and grip slippage, i.e.,

erage specific heat over the temperature energy loss at the workpiece/tool inter- Q total (t )

q1(t ) =

1

range TMAX; and TMAX is the maximum face. It turns out this method was inde- (16)

temperature rise. pendently discovered by Dr. H. A. Nied,

AC k 2 2 C2

1+

Since the maximum temperature at- Sr., of General Electric Co., and was k 1 1 C1

tained is not known a priori, an iterative brought to the authors attention through

procedure must be used. The peak joint Ref. 22. Using the same model for the ro- For the two proposed heat inputs, the

temperature is first estimated, the energy tational speed as shown in Equation 7, thermal profiles will now be compared

lost to flash is then evaluated, the result- the total power dissipation in the weld is for a stainless steel-to-niobium weld. The

ing thermal profile is calculated, and the assumed to be the following: weld parameter data and assumed ther-

m n

Q(t ) = CO

process is repeated until the maximum mal properties of the materials are shown

predicted temperature matches the esti- in Table 1. The resulting thermal profiles

mate. The constant AO can now be eval- are shown in Figure 5 and are compared

t t

n n 1

uated: to the actual data at the position of the

exp 2 m (13)

weld interface, i.e., x = 0. Model 1 refers

Q( t) = A O (t ) to the heat flux as specified by Equation

As before, the constant Co takes into 8, whereas Model 2 refers to the heat flux

0 Q(t )dt = (EO Eflash ) account the fact that some of the energy as given by Equation 13.

dissipated in the weld must go into heat- A measure of how well the two mod-

so

ing and expelling the flash. Co is calcu- els represent the data can be deduced by

AO =

(EO E flash ) lated in an entirely analogous manner to considering the error as a function of

Ao and is given by the following: time:

0 (t )dt Error(t) M(t) Y(t) (17)

1 E

where EO = IO 2O (10) CO = 1 flash (14) where M(t) is the predicted temperature at

2 EO

t and Y(t) is the measured temperature at t.

Dave Supplement for 10/01 9/27/01 9:34 AM Page 250

Table 1 Weld Parameter Data and Assumed Thermal Properties Table 2 Comparison Between Subscale

and Fullscale Inertia Weld Parameters

Quantity Value

(all thermophysical data from Ref. 20) Parameter Value

Initial Rotational Speed 1487 rpm (1500 nominal) Full-scale Inertia 5.19 lb-ft2

Moment of Inertia 5.19 lb-ft2 Subscale Inertia 3.32 lb-ft2

Axial Welding Force 8330 lb Full-scale Initial Speed 1570 rpm

Average Specific Heat for Nb over 2731273 K 0.29 J/g/K Subscale Initial Speed 1675 rpm

Average Thermal Conductivity for Nb over 2731273 K 0.59 W/cm/K Full-scale Area 0.231 in.2

Average Specific Heat for 316 SS over 2731273 K 0.56 J/g/K Subscale Area 0.168 in.2

Average Thermal Conductivity for 316 SS over temperature 0.21 W/cm/K Bond Pressure (held constant 25854 lb/in.2

range 2731200 K as area changes)

Fraction of total power going to 316 SS side (equation 16) 0.445

Fraction of total power going to Nb side 0.555

The nominal bond as the part size changes, then this sug-

pressure is usually not gests an additional scaling law (in addi-

altered as the size is in- tion to Equation 18):

creased, although the

bond force is adjusted to rpPq = (const.) (21)

make the bond pressure

constant. In the present In the present work, it was assumed

treatment, the effect of that p = q = 1 in Equation 21 for purposes

pressure is considered of testing the newly proposed scaling

and modifications to the law. First, welds were produced between

bond pressure with size titanium and niobium using only Equa-

are proposed. The effect tion 18, i.e., keeping the initial bond en-

of increasing pressure is ergy per unit area a constant. The inter-

tracked by a close ex- facial bond pressure was also held

amination of the power constant. The subscale tube diameter

Fig. 8 A comparison between the power dissipation during the dissipation curves, and was 0.75 in., and the full scale was 1 in.

bond for the full-scale bond and the subscale bond conducted at joints made in compo- The bond parameters for both bonds

various bond forces. nents of different sizes based purely on Equation 18 and con-

are considered equiva- stant interfacial bond pressure are shown

lent when their respec- in Table 2.

The evolution of the error is shown in tive power dissipation curves resemble The full-scale bonds made under

Fig. 6 for the two models under consid- one another. these conditions easily passed a destruc-

eration. It is clear Model 2 better repre- The behavior of the hot, highly tive bend test (samples were bent after

sents the data at short times, whereas worked interfacial layer that forms during flash was removed and a bend angle of

Model 1 seems to be more suitable at the inertia weld can generally be mod- greater than 45 deg was achieved before

long times. Another important factor that eled using the following phenomenolog- failure at the joint), whereas the subscale

has been ignored in the treatment thus far ical form (Ref. 15): samples failed immediately upon being

is the effect of temperature-dependent subjected to bending loads (essentially

material properties. This effect is shown = (const.)(V)pPq (19) zero bend angle). Clearly the assumed

in Fig. 7 by changing the assumed mate- scaling law based purely on Equation 18

rial properties for conduction through the where is the shear stress, V is the rel- and a constant interfacial bond pressure

stainless steel. ative slip velocity, and P is the interfacial did not work. The bond pressure was

bond pressure. then modified based on Equation 21 with

Heat Input Model as a Basis The slip velocity for thin-walled tubes exponents p and q equal to 1. The origi-

for Selection of Weld Parameters is given by v = r, where r is the average nal bond pressure based on constant

radius. The expression for the tangential bond pressure was 5978 lbf. The bond

It will now be shown that the pro- shear (radial shear effects ignored) stress pressure predicted by Equation 21 with p

posed heat generation term can be used then becomes the following: = q = 1 is 7963 lbf. The full-scale bond

to select weld parameters as part size is was conducted at a bond pressure of

[ ]

(t ) = (const.) (t ) r P q

p

changed, i.e., the parameter-scaling 5978 lbf. Based on the data in Fig. 8, as

problem. The basic assumption in inertia the subscale and full-scale power curves

welding is that the energy per unit area of or start to resemble one another, the result-

the joint must be kept constant as the (t ) ing bonds are expected to have compa-

weld parameters are scaled for larger or = (const.) r p P q (20) rable bond quality. The sample bend tests

[ ] ()

p

smaller diameters. This means the fol- t also suggest this is the case. This means

lowing, with E specified by the initial fly- the power dissipation curve can provide

wheel kinetic energy: The quantities on the left-hand side of valuable guidance in the selection of

Equation 20 are directly related to the bond parameters as the size of the joint

E1 E heat input and power dissipation during changes. The assumption of p = q = 1 is

= 2 (18)

A1 A 2 the weld. Therefore, if it is assumed the somewhat arbitrary, but importance

power dissipation is to be held constant should not be attached to the specific

Dave Supplement for 10/01 9/27/01 9:34 AM Page 251

values of these parameters. The central 0.2 m. Therefore, the Reynolds Number possible to establish a process window

message of this study is that the power of this flow is the following: based solely on in-situ measurements,

dissipation characteristic as a function of which would be the first step toward a

time is a good means of transferring weld U x (0.93 m / s) (0.2 m) 100% quality-assured methodology for

Re =

( )

parameters from one part size to a inertia welding (no postprocess inspection

smaller or larger size.

v 1 106 m 2 / s required). Accounting for temperature-de-

5 pendent material properties can enhance

= 1.86 10 (23) the thermal predictions in this work, and

Inertia Welding Heat Generation

which is within the laminar regime. The such simulations are in progress.

and the Possible Existence

corresponding film thickness then be-

of a Liquid Interlayer

comes Acknowledgments

There has been and continues to be v x

some debate about the possible exis- This research was funded under DOE

U

tence of a liquid layer during inertia or contract No. W-7405-ENG-36. The au-

friction welding. Cheng (Refs. 6, 7) al-

lowed for the existence of such a molten =

(1 10 6

)

m 2 / s (0.2 m )

thors also wish to thank Ann M. Kelly for

her valuable assistance in metallography,

layer in his modeling work. Several ex- (0.93 m / s) Dr. David F. Teter for his valuable sug-

gestions and electron microscopy work,

perimental studies by Squires (Ref. 23),

Weiss, and Hazlett (Ref. 8), and Hasui, et = 464m (24) and Dr. R. D. Dixon for his critical review

al. (Ref. 24), did not find evidence of of the manuscript.

From microstructural investigation,

melting. Wang and Nagappan (Ref. 10)

there is no evidence of a 400+ micron-

predicted the peak temperatures would References

wide melt layer that, if it did exist, would

be below the melting point based on their

be most conspicuous and easily de-

modeling work of inertia-welded steel 1. Rykalin, N. N., Pugin, A. I., and

tectable. Furthermore, even on submi-

bars. Wang (Ref. 9) points out available Vasileva, V. A. 1959. The heating and cooling

cron-length scales, no evidence of melt -

metallurgical investigation does not sup- of rods butt-welded by the friction process.

ing was detected. At the interface, there

port the existence of a liquid film at the Svarochnoe Proizvodstvo (Welding Produc-

was an intermetallic reaction layer con-

interface, and torque measurements do tion): 4252.

sisting of a Nb-Fe-Cr intermetallic com-

not show a disruption or sudden drop 2. Vill, V. I. 1959. Energy distribution in

pound that was approximately 200 nm

that may be expected on account of a liq- the friction welding of steel bars. Svarochnoe

thick. If we assume this layer was formed

uid interlayer. Proizvodstvo (Welding Production): 3151.

by liquid-phase reaction, we can ap-

To further analyze the possibility of 3. Geldman, A. S., and Sander, M. P. 1959.

proximate the thickness of the laminar

melting during the inertia bonds made in Power and heating in the friction welding of

boundary layer to be the width of this re-

this work, the possibility of a fluid layer t h i ck - walled steel pipes. S va ro c h n o e

action zone. In that case, using Equation

subjected to shear is considered. A pre- Proizvodstvo (Welding Production): 5361.

22, the equivalent metal viscosity would

dicted melt layer thickness will now be 4. Zadegson, R. I., and Voznessenskii, V. D.

have been approximately 2 x 10-10 cP,

derived for such a layer by invoking sim- 1959. Power and heat parameters of friction

which is a physically unrealistic number

ple hydrodynamic reasoning. The lami- welding. Svarochnoe Proizvodstvo (Welding

for molten metals. It is, therefore, rea-

nar boundary layer thickness is specified Production): 6370.

sonable to assume there was no melting

by the following: 5. Carlslaw, H. S., and Jaeger, J. C. 1959. Con-

during the welding process.

duction of Heat in Solids. Oxford, U.K.:

v x Clarendon Press.

(22) Conclusions and Future Work

U 6. Cheng, C. J. 1962. Transient temperature

distribution during friction welding of two

where x is the position along the wall in In this study of the heat generation similar materials in tubular form. Welding

the direction of flow, v is the kinematic term during inertia welding of dissimilar Journal 41(12): 542-s to 550-s.

viscosity, and U is the free-stream tubes, the following was demonstrated: 7. Cheng, C. J. 1963. Transient temperature

velocity. 1) The temperature profile during in- distribution during friction welding of two dis-

The average velocity during the speed ertia welding can be well represented by similar materials in tubular form. Welding

curve decay is obtained by finding the av- simple analytical solutions that directly Journal 42(5): 233-s to 240-s.

erage value of the speed curve shown in use machine-generated data. 8. Weiss, H. D., and Hazlett, T. H. 1966.

Equation 7 using fit parameters as de- 2) The proposed forms of the heat gen- The role of material properties and interface

scribed in Fig. 4. This results in an aver- eration term can be used to provide guid- temperatures in friction welding dissimilar

age velocity of 0.93 m/s. The dynamic ance for parameter development when metals. ASME Paper 66-MET-8.

viscosity of molten iron ranges from 5 to attempting to transfer successful weld pa- 9. Wang, K. K. 1975. Friction welding.

10 centipoise (a centipoise, cP, is equal rameters to varying part diameters. WRC Bulletin no. 204.

to 103 kgm1s1) over a range of temper- 3) It is unlikely a fluid layer was gen- 10. Wang, K. K., and Nagappan, P. 1970.

atures (Ref. 25), and this equates to a erated during the inertia welds discussed Transient temperature distribution in inertia

kinematic viscosity of 6 X 107 1.2 x 106 in this work. welding of steels. Welding Journal 49(9): 419-s

m2/s. The distance x is the maximum dis- The heat generation terms represented to 426-s.

tance the part may rotate during the iner- by Equations 8 and 13 could also be used 11. Johnson, P. C., Stein, B. A., and Davis,

tia weld, which in this case is the total cir- as part of an in-situ process monitoring R. S. 1966. Inertia Welding. Unpublished

cumferential travel during the decay in methodology. If the heat generation term, technical report, Caterpillar Tractor Co.

rotational velocity. Again using Equation the effective bond time (time required for 12. Midling, O. T., and Grong, O. 1994. A

7 for the conditions described in Fig. 3, angular speed to drop to 10% of its initial process model for friction welding of Al-Mg-

the part makes a total of 2.5 rotations, so value), the material burnoff, and the Si alloys and Al-SiC metal matrix composites

the maximum possible travel distance is burnoff rate are all monitored, it may be I: HAZ temperature and strain rate distrib-

Dave Supplement for 10/01 9/27/01 9:34 AM Page 252

ution. Acta Metallugica et Materialia 42(5): A. Z. 1996. Friction welding of Al-Al, Al-steel, Report SR9821, Inertia Welding of IN718 and

15951609. and steel-steel samples. J. of Mat Eng. and Per. 1045 Steel: Numerical Modeling and Experi-

13. Sluzalec, A. 1985. Thermoplastic effects 5(1): 8999. ments.

in friction welding analyzed by finite element 18. Sahin, A. Z., Yilbas, B. S., Ahmed, M., 23. Squires, I. F. 1966. Thermal and me-

method. The Effects of Fabrication Related and Nickel, J. 1998. Analysis of the friction chanical characteristics of friction welding

Stresses on Product Manufacture and Perfor- welding process in relation to the welding of mild steel. British Welding Journal 13(11):

mance, TWI Conference Proceedings. The copper and steel bars. J. of Mat. Proc. And 652657.

Welding Institute, Abington, U.K. Paper 8. Tech. 82: 127136. 24. Hasui, et al. 1968. Experimental stud-

14. Sluzalec, A. 1990. Thermal effects in 19. Weiss, R. 1998. Residual stresses and ies on friction welding phenomena. Trans.

friction welding. Int. J. of Mech. Sci. 32(6): strength of friction welded ceramic/metal Nat. Res. Inst. Metals Japan 10(4): 5371.

467478. joints. Welding Journal 77(3): 115-s to 122-s. 25. Geiger, G. H., and Poirier, D. R. 1973.

15. Moal, A., Massoni, E., and Chenot, J-L. 20. Fu, L., and Duan, L. 1998. The coupled Transport Phenomena in Metallurgy. Reading,

1990. A finite element modeling for the iner- deformation and heat flow analysis by finite Mass.: Addison Wesley Publishing Co.

tia welding process. Conference on Computa- element method during friction welding.

tional Plasticity: Fundamentals and Applica- Welding Journal 77(5): 202-s to 207-s.

tions I, pp. 289300. Swansea, U. K.: 21. Sawada, T., and Nishiwaki, N. 1991.

Pineridge Press. Response of a thermocouple to transient tem-

16. Moal, A., and Massoni, E. 1995. Finite perature changes in a metal to which it is at-

element modeling of the inertia welding of tached. Int. J. Mech. Sci 33(7): 551561.

two similar parts. Engineering Computations 22. Communication with Tom McGaughy

12(6): 497512. of the Edison Welding Institute (EWI),

17. Sahin, A. Z., Yilbas, B. S., and Al-Garni, 10/20/99, who distributed a copy of EWI CRP

to the Welding Journal Research Supplement

All authors should address themselves to the and symbols are important considerations in processing

following questions when writing papers for submission a manuscript for publication. For welding terminology,

to the Welding Research Supplement: the Welding Journal adheres to ANSI/AWS A3.0-94,

Why was the work done? Standard Welding Terms and Definitions.

What was done? Papers submitted for consideration in the Welding

What was found? Research Supplement are required to undergo Peer

What is the significance of your results? Review before acceptance for publication. Submit an

original and one copy (double-spaced, with 1-in. margins

What are your most important conclusions?

on 8 12 x 11-in. or A4 paper) of the manuscript. Submit

With those questions in mind, most authors can the abstract only on a computer disk. The preferred

logically organize their material along the following format is from any Macintosh word processor on a 3.5-

lines, using suitable headings and subheadings to in. double- or high-density disk. Other acceptable

divide the paper. formats include ASCII text, Windows or DOS. A

1) Abstract. A concise summary of the major manuscript submission form should accompany the

elements of the presentation, not exceeding 200 words, to manuscript.

help the reader decide if the information is for him or her. Tables and figures should be separate from the

2) Introduction. A short statement giving relevant manuscript copy and only high-quality figures will be

background, purpose and scope to help orient the published. Figures should be original line art or glossy

reader. Do not duplicate the abstract. photos. Special instructions are required if figures are

3) Experimental Procedure, Materials, Equipment. submitted by electronic means. To receive complete

4) Results, Discussion. The facts or data obtained instructions and the manuscript submission form,

and their evaluation. please contact the Peer Review Coordinator, Doreen

5) Conclusion. An evaluation and interpretation of Kubish, at (305) 443-9353, ext. 275; FAX 305-443-

your results. Most often, this is what the readers 7404; or write to the American Welding Society, 550 NW

remember. LeJeune Rd., Miami, FL 33126.

6) Acknowledgment, References, and Appendix.

Keep in mind that proper use of terms, abbreviations

- ANALYSIS OF MANUAL WELDING PROCESSES ADOPTED IN FABRICATION OF SEATING BENCHES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SOLAPUR CITYUploaded byIJIERT-International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology
- The Prediction of the Temperature Distribution and Weld Pool Geometry in the Gas Metal Arc Welding ProcessUploaded byAlejandra Hernandez
- 5332-0Uploaded byEsakkiraja
- IRB 1600Uploaded byJosé Eduardo Vivian Madero
- pqrUploaded bynaseema1
- HeatSourceGeometry EnUploaded byMiiss Pooja
- Fm-ti-020_rev.0 Inspection Report Ultrasonic Examination (Aws d1.1).Eff.161028Uploaded byJindarat Kasemsooksakul
- resume1Uploaded byapi-326370650
- thermo1(20162)Uploaded byhillary
- or assignment 5Uploaded byapi-323462816
- NB-T 47003.1-2009 钢制焊接常压容器Uploaded byYu Chen
- He Attemp UnitUploaded byFebri Tri Rezky
- Heat DefinitionUploaded bypepe.books
- Quali MetUploaded bycute
- PBL - Heat EnergyUploaded byDoug Smith
- mass vs temperature lab template esUploaded byapi-420198655
- CT CalculationsUploaded byhbitho
- Term Odin a MicaUploaded byWil Sa
- Tools and Consumables Welder Qualification TestUploaded byTaufikWibowo
- Nicrofer6030 Alloy 690 eUploaded byRizqi D. Kurnianto
- InterviewUploaded byrajmohapatra
- Asme Seccion Viii Div 1 - Apartado Uw-2 Restricciones de ServicioUploaded byAlexander Corvin
- story.docxUploaded byTarun Kumar
- ESAB FILLED UP DATA - 71 Tech Specs of Orbital TIG Pipe Welding MachineUploaded byDeepak Kumar
- homeworkUploaded byVamshi Krishna
- AE QuestionsUploaded byHimanshu Vasistha
- 1Uploaded byHoiver Duas
- Learning to Arc WeldUploaded byKrishnaAhuja
- S3LUploaded bygowrishpadiyar
- AWS D1.8Uploaded bymhmgola

- CorrosionResistantAlloysintheOilandGasIndustrySelectionGuidelinesUpdate_10073Uploaded bydigeca
- Affordable-Quasi-Three-Dimensional-Inverse-Design-Method-for-Pump-Impellers.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- CSA W59 2013Uploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- P16139-151Uploaded byjinggascribd
- DIN EN ISO 2553.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- DIN EN ISO 2553.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- DIN EN ISO 2553.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Technical Reference Guide Fastenal K Factor and MoreUploaded bydlight0
- Welding 9%Ni steelsUploaded bypmoino
- Flow-Field-Investigation-for-a-series-of-Right-Angle-Minium-Axial-Depth-Pump-Intakes.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Key Changes for the 2017 Edition of the ASME BPVC.pdf[1]Uploaded byCarlos Sanders
- Asme Viii Div 1 BpvcUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- A-Cavitation-Resistant-Hydrostatic-Seal-for-High-Pressure-Breakdown.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- ANSI EIA 748 B earned value management systems.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Nondestructive Test MethodsUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- High energy in centrifugal pupms.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Evaluation-of-Coatings-for-Resistance-to-Abrasive-and-Adhesive-Wear-in-Pump-Components.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Vertical Froth Pump.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Vane-Pass-Vibration-Source-Assessment-and-Correction-A-Practical-Guide-for-Centrifugal-Pumps.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Experience-in-the-use-of-Flexure-Pivot-Tilt-Pad-Bearings-in-Boiler-Feedwater-Pumps.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- The-Suction-Performance-of-Centrifugal-Pumps-Possibilities-and-Limits-of-Improvements.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- The-Use-of-Basic-Hydraulics-to-Solve-Field-Problems-Three-Cases.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Twenty-Three-Years-Operating-Experience-with-the-Worlds-Largest-Boiler-Feedwater-Pump.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Two Phase PumpingUploaded byzugabere
- Temperature Measurement at Low Flow on Typical Ansi Chemical Process PumpsUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- Coupled vibration analysis for pumpUploaded byilmu2
- P1247-59Uploaded bygeorgadam1983
- Tutorial-on-Composite-Pumps.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- The-Effects-of-Valve-Dynamics-on-Reciprocating-Pump-Reliability.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com
- ASME-B73.1M-Pump-Reliability-Program-Formation-A-Data-Based-Approach.pdfUploaded bypedro heraclitoromanhotmail.com

- MemcachedUploaded byZoth Bernstein
- steam turbine q&s.docxUploaded bydevaraj
- POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS IN SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF AN EXTERIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMUploaded byRoscii Rulez
- GSM Multi-sector Solution Guide(GSM BSS Draft a)Uploaded byDavid Istur
- mfc9Uploaded byEzzaki Saadia
- ARTIGO 12B_A Review of Buildability Performancein Hong KongUploaded bydelciogarcia
- Density MethodUploaded bygrtuna
- 2013_Series_100_RMST_Car_10-19-12Uploaded byAnonymous Jk6qaXw
- 2005-01 January Domson Digest - Load Sharing in Multi-Crane LiftsUploaded bydomsoneng
- Copy of Motor Feeder Cable & Cable Tray Sizing and DataUploaded byabdkha8644
- Anurag Jain Resume DBAUploaded byAnurag Jain
- Successful Offshore IT OutsourcingUploaded bysolovat
- Global Smart Meter Market- Insights, Market Size, Share, Growth, Trends Analysis and Forecast to 2021Uploaded bytufail attar
- Chapter 7 - Site Investigation and GeophysicsUploaded byZulaikha Kamal
- Kaizen - The Many Ways for Getting BetterUploaded byfahrie_man
- smch06_ra.docxUploaded byKeith
- Java J2EE Training ReportUploaded bymansha99
- Manual Kit Akron FlowUploaded byTomas Gaviria Martinez
- 10.1016@j.compchemeng.2019.03.038Uploaded byPrathamesh
- Scaffold Checklist 11-6-13 PvUploaded byLAL SANKAR
- T.LUploaded byShankha Shubhro Shome
- Ampeg B15N ManualUploaded byBenjamin Debosnigs Saint Fort
- 93138392-AmplifierUploaded bysuper_lativo
- netapp-data-ontap-simulator-cookbookUploaded byjaycyborg
- Slip Ring PresentationUploaded byMynampati Sai Srinivas
- 2N7002DWA.pdfUploaded byaranjessyzat4134
- 1.NDip Eng ElectricalUploaded bysmprabu24317
- GL2200+Parts+Identification 3Uploaded bytjwuthee
- ANSYS Tutorial Seismic AnalysisUploaded byArut MV
- Customer (Marketing ) RequirementsUploaded byGolden Globe