Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Firms create manufacturing capacities for production for goods; some provide
services to customers. They sell their goods or services to earn profits. They raise funds to
acquired manufacturing and other facilities. Thus, the three most important activities of a
business firm are:
1. Production
2. Marketing
3. Finance
Page 1
FUNCTION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Functions are broadly classified into three groups. Those relating to resource allocation,
those covering the financing of these investments and these determining how much cash are
taken out and how much reinvested.
1) Investment decision
2) Financing decision
3) Dividend decision
Investment decision
Firms have scarce resources that must be allocated among competitive uses. The
financial management provides a frame work for firms to take these decisions wisely. The
investment decisions include not only those that create revenues and profits (e.g. introducing
a new product line) but also those that save money.
So, the investment decisions are the decisions relating to assets composition of the
firm. Assets can be classified into fixed assets and current assets, and the4refore the
investment decisions can also be bifurcated into Capital Budgeting decisions and the
Working Capital Management.
The Capital Budgeting decisions are more crucial for any firm. A finance manager
may be asked to decide about.
a) Which asset should be purchased out of different alternative options? To buy an asset
or to get it on lease.
b) To produce a part of the final product or to procured it from some other supplier.
Working Capital management, on the other hand, deals with the Management of current
assets off the firm. Though the current assets do not contribute directly to the earnings, yet
their existence is necessitated for the proper, efficient and optimum utilization of fixed assets.
Page 2
There are dangers of both the excessive working capital as well as the shortage of working
capital. A finance manager has to ensure sufficient and adequate working capital to the firm.
Financing Decisions
As firms make decisions concerning where to invest these resources, they have also to
decide two they should raise resources. There are two main sources of finance for nay firm,
the shareholders funds and the borrowed funds. The borrowed funds are always repayable
and require payment of a committed cost in the form of interest on a periodic basis. The
borrowed funds are relatively cheaper but always entail risk.
The risk is known as the financial risk i.e., the risk of insolvency due to non-payment
of interest or non-repayment of capital amount. The shareholders fund is the main source of
funds to any firm. This may comprise of the equity share capital, preference share capital and
the accumulated profits.
Firms usually adopt a policy of employing both the borrowed funds as well as the
shareholders funds to finance their activities. The employment of these sources in
combination is also known as financial management.
Dividend Decisions
Another major area of the decision marking by a finance manager is known as the
Dividend decisions which deal with the appropriation of after tax profits. These profits are
available to be distributing among the shareholders or can be retained by the firm for
reinvestment within the firm.
The profits which are not distributed are impliedly retained in the firm. A firms
whether small or big, have to decide how much of the profits should be reinvested back in the
business and how much should be taken out in form of dividends i.e., return on capital. On
one hand, paying out more to the owners may help satisfying their expectations; on the other
hand, doing so has other implications as a business that reinvests less will tend to grow
slower.
Page 3
IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY
Capital investments, representing the growing edge of a business, are deemed to be
very important THREE inter related factors.
The influence firm growth in the long term consequences capital investment
decisions have considerable impact on what the firm can do in future.
They affect the risk of the firm; it is difficult to reverse capital investment
decisions because the market for used capital investment in ill organized or most of the
capital equipments bought by a firm to meet its specific requirements.
Page 4
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The study of capital structure in JOCIL Limited includes analyzing the investment decision of
the firm. As substantial amounts are tied up in such decision, it needs careful analysis and proper
management in order to minimize the manufacturing costs and maximize its profits. As the
information available is limited and the subject is vast the study is combined to overall capital
structure techniques followed at the firm.
As firms make decisions concerning where to invest these resources, they have also to
decide two they should raise resources. There are two main sources of finance for nay firm,
the shareholders funds and the borrowed funds. The borrowed funds are always repayable
and require payment of a committed cost in the form of interest on a periodic basis. The
borrowed funds are relatively cheaper but always entail risk.
The risk is known as the financial risk i.e., the risk of insolvency due to non-payment of
interest or non-repayment of capital amount. The shareholders fund is the main source of
funds to any firm. This may comprise of the equity share capital, preference share capital and
the accumulated profits.
Firms usually adopt a policy of employing both the borrowed funds as well as the
shareholders funds to finance their activities. The employment of these sources in
combination is also known as financial management.
Page 5
NEED FOR THE STUDY
A project is an activity sufficiently self-contained to permit financial and
commercial analysis. In most cases projects represent expenditure of capital funds by pre-
existing which want to expand or improve their operation.
The rationale underlying the capital structure decisions efficiency. Thus, a firm
must replace worn and obsolete plant and machinery, acquire fixed assets for current and new
products and make strategic investment decisions. The quality of these decisions is improved
by capital structure. Capital structure decision can be of two types:
Page 6
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
To study the industry profile in general and Jocil limited profile in particular
To measure the long term stability and structure of the firm to use the capital structure
To understand the relation between capital structures, cost of capital value of the firm
using net income approach, net operating income approach.
To summaries and offer suggestions for the better investment proposals in Jocil limited.
Page 7
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Methodology is a systematic process of collecting
information in order to analyze and verifies a phenomenon. The collection of data is two
principle sources. They are discussed as
Primary data
Secondary data
PRIMARY DATA
The primary data needed for the study is gathered through interview with
concerned officers and staff, either individually or collectively, sum of the information has
been verified or supplemented with personal observation conducting personal interviews with
concerned officers of finance department of JOCIL LIMITED
SECONDARY DATA
The secondary data needed for the study was collected from published
sources such as, pamphlets of annual reports, returns and internal records, reference from text
books and journal management.
Page 8
Diagrammatic Representation of Research Methodology
DATA
SOURCES
Primary Secondary
Sources sources
Page 9
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The following the limitations of the study:
The project has to be completed with the available data given to us.
The period of study that is 6 weeks is not enough to conduct study of the project
The study is carried based on the information and documents provided by the
organization
There was no scope of gathering current information, as the auditing has not been
done by time of project work.
The procedure has to be completed with the available data with us.
The collected information is mainly through secondary data.
Page 10
INDUSTRY PROFILE
Introduction:
After expanding at a snails pace, the market for personal wash products
appears to have come to grinding halt in 2001. After posting modest single digit
growth in 1997-2000 figures for the first seven months suggest that market for
detergent soaps has actually shrunk.
Estimates about the extent of declines in market size vary, Hindustan liver, which
straddles. The category with 60% market share by value, say the market shrunk by
4.5% in value terms in the first half of 2001.
The Indian Soap and Detergent Manufactures Association, puts the decline at 1%.
Other industry sources suggest that the extent of De-growth in the first eight months
of 2005 could be as high as 7%.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE DETERGENT INDUSTRY;
Although the start of the synthetic detergent industry is not shrouded in the veils of
history as were the beginnings of the soap industry, it is nevertheless not easy to
pinpoint exactly when the detergent industry, as such, came into being. The
primary problem is to decide exactly what is being referred to as a synthetic
detergent. The term itself leads to confusion. In INDIA the words surfactant or
syndet are being used, whilst in Europe the term 'tenside' (for tensio-active
material) is coming into fashion.
But if the shrinking market size suggest that Indian consumers are actually been
cutting back on their use of detergent soaps, this is not really the case. In volume
terms, the market for detergent soaps has continued to show a growth of 10% in
the first eight months of 2005
The major players have certainly managed to sell more detergent soaps by volume
but price competition in the segment and slew of promotional campaigns have
reduced the effective realization per unit sold. This has probably neutralized the
gains from volume expansion.
Page 11
THE HISTORY OF SOAP
A soap-like material found in clay cylinders during the excavation of ancient Babylon
is evidence that soap making was known as early as 2800 B.C
The History of Soap making
B. J. Johnson Company was making soap entirely of vegetable oils, palm and olive.
The soap they produced became so popular; they renamed their company after the
soap Palmolive.
Detergent Chemistry History
Although the start of the synthetic detergent industry is not shrouded in the veils of
history as were the beginnings of the soap industry, it is nevertheless not easy to
pinpoint exactly when the first were invented.
Formula 409
Formula 409 all-purpose cleaner was invented in 1957.
The History of Soap Making and Innovation
The first soap manufacturing plant was Marseilles. Its soil was
perfect for the cultivation of olive trees and the factory produced vegetable
sodas. However, in time the industry grew so large that it was necessary to
import oil and vegetable sodas from Spain and Italy. By the eighth century, it is
documented that there were soap factories in Italy and Spain. It was not until
the twelfth or thirteenth century that this industry was embraced by France.
France then passed on the tradition to England. The French made their soaps
almost exclusively from olive oil, while the English delved into many different
kinds of soap. Eventually the French added palm and cocoa oils and expanded
their product base.
The History of Soap Making
Anyone who has seen Fight Club knows that Tyler Darden said that soap
was the yardstick of civilization. Now whether that was an actual quote from someone
of historical importance or not, it is difficult to deny the influence soap has had on
human civilization
Page 12
When studying the history of soap, many theories emerge. Some claim that
soap was first used in prehistoric times while others claim that the Gauls
created it. There is even the possibility that soap may not have been used as a
means to clean at first. In fact, it may instead have been used as an antiseptic
to heal wounds.
Today, soap is made from of fats and an alkali. In the past however,
people made their own soap from animal fats and wood ashes. Regardless of
who first created the concoction, it was undoubtedly used in Rome. This is an
established fact because a soap makers shop was discovered within the rubble
of Pompeii after the eruption of Mount Vesuvius. The Romans often used soap
as a cosmetic. It was quite popular with the ladies, for they used it to dye their
hair red. Plant extracts were probably used to acquire this colour.
SOAPS DETERGENTS
The soap and detergent industry covers laundry and toilet soaps and
synthetic detergents in the form of liquids, powders and bars. These are consumer
products and their quality, price, marketing and distribution network determines the
success of the units in the sector. The industry has developed both in the small scale
sector and organized sector. The manufacture of detergents and toilet soaps has been
deli censed. The Indian personal care market is estimated to be worth US$ 4 Billion
(approx. Rs. 20,000 corer) this includes Bath and Shower products, Hair Care, Skin
Care, Cosmetics, Fragrances and Deodorants. Bar Soaps also has grown at a growth
rate of 5% per annul over the last 5 years and stands at market size of US$ 1.5 billion
(approx Rs. 7500 corers).The overall Indian personal care market has the potential to
grow at 15-16% per annum and thereby double to US$ 8 billion (approx 40,000
corers) by 2012.
Dust control
Volatile organic emissions
Dust present during production and transfer of the bulk powdered detergent (and
powdered raw materials) can be a serious problem. Dry and wet cyclones are used to separate
out most of the dust and all the emissions are carefully monitored. If the level of dust exceeds
the acceptable limits, suitable remedial action should be taken. Dust levels in emissions
should be kept below 50 mg m-3.
Page 14
color and brightening agents in minimal packaging will go a long way in assuring healthier
and cleaner environment.
Environmental/Health Sustainability
The Soap and Detergent manufacturers can contribute to the enhancement of human health
and quality of life by adopting responsible formulations and through the production and sale
of environment friendly cleaning products & ingredients. Some initiatives, which soap and
detergent manufacturers can take for environment / health sustainability, are -
To only market products, which have proved to be safe for humans and the
environment
While production, the manufacturers should carefully consider the potential health
and environmental effects, exposures and releases, which will be associated with the
production, transportation, use and disposal of different cleaning products
To encourage and promote transparent communication of safety and handling
information
To facilitate basic research to resolve uncertainties around human and environmental
safety when they arise
Page 15
INDIAN COMPETITIVENESS AND COMPARISON WITH THE WORLD
MARKETS
The following factors make India a competitive player in FMCG sector:
Availability of raw materials:-
Because of the diverse agro-climatic conditions in India, there is a large raw material
base suitable for food processing industries. India is the largest producer of livestock, milk,
sugarcane, coconut, spices and cashew and is the second largest producer of rice, wheat and
fruits &vegetables
India also produces caustic soda and soda ash, which are required for the production of soaps
Main Competitors
The largest current soap producer, Dial Corp, consistently achieves strong sales, and
has enjoyed strong market share in the commercial markets. Producing a wide variety
of soap products, Dial has maintained 18% in market share over the last decade. The
Page 16
other largest commercial soap providers include Kimberly Clark, Gojo, SoftSoap,
Provon and NXT.
1. Jocil limited
2. HLL (Surf)
4. Henkel (Henko)
6. Godrej soap
7. Aura Oil Industries
8. Hyderabad Chemicals
9. Jain Soap and Detergent
Page 17
MAJOR PROBLEMS IN SOAP INDUSTRY
Soap wont trace
Cause; insufficient lye, excesses of water wrong temperature not stirred enough or too
slow.
A high percentage of unsaturated fats in the base oils also cause slow tracing.
Solution; Double check water oil and lye measurements, if amounts and temperatures are
correct continue stirring up to 3 hours or until the solution traces. If possible switch to a stick
blender which will substantially speed pup tracing. Remember that you dont have to stir
constantly for the full 3 hours. stir 5 minutes and then wait 15 and repeat. after 3hours stirring
or 30 minutes blending, If it shows no signs of thickening, pour into molds regardless of trace
and let sit for 24 hours. If the mixture still does not harden, discard it.
Mixture curdles while stirring;
Cause; oil and or lye poured into mixing bowl at too high temperature. Sporadic or slow
stirring.
Solution; Switch to a stick blender and smooth out then pour into molds.
you can also bars. If there are irregularities discard the bars.
Mixture sets up too quickly in pan;
Cause; oil and lye water temperatures too high or low. Fats and oils are reacting to a
synthetic fragrance or other addititve.the percentage of saturated fats was excessive.
Solution; pour mix of the into the molds as quickly as possible. Smooth out with a spatula.
Air bubbles in soap in some cases
Cause; Stirred too long or whipped while stirring.
Solution; Using a stick blender can cause this. It is not really a problem. Only aesthetic in
some cases.
Various aesthetic problem, crackers warped soap, mottled look unwanted colors,etc..
Cause; Various Causes temperature changes bad molds poor recipe etc..
Solution; These bars should still be good as soap.rebatching is a good option for these
bars.
Page 18
GOVERNMENT POLICIES OF INDUSTRY
Fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) is the fourth largest sector in the Indian
economy The overall FMCG market is expected to increase at a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 14.7 per cent to touch US$ 110.4 billion during 2012-2020,
with the rural FMCG market anticipated to increase at a CAGR of 17.7 per cent to
reach US$ 100 billion during 2012-2025.
The FMCG sector has grown at an annual average of about 11 per cent over the
last decade. Food products is the leading segment, accounting for 43 per cent of the
overall market. Personal care (22 per cent) and fabric care (12 per cent) come next in
terms of market share. Growing awareness, easier access, and changing lifestyles
have been the key growth drivers for the sector.
There is a lot of scope for growth in the FMCG sector from rural markets with
consumption expected to grow in these areas as penetration of brands increases. Also,
with rising per capita income, which is projected to expand at a CAGR of 7.4 per cent
over the period 2013-19, the FMCG sector is anticipated to witness some major
growth.
Page 19
SUGGESTIONS
There should be more and more emphasis given by the company for
satisfying the customer up to a apex limit and by providing the utility of
every penny of his money.
There should be more use of information technology.
The company should be flexible to bend its rules and procedures in the
clients favour.
The company can communicate and develop stronger customer bonding
by providing social and financial benefits.
Page 20
COMPANY PROFILE
Page 21
Vision & mission
Vision:
The main vision of the company is to manufacture fatty acids and Toilet
soaps.
Consumer Safety
Mission:
Jocil Mission is to move up the levels of uncompromised customer care
and to be a valued supplier of high quality products and services.
Safety, Health and Environment
Company's Philosophy :
Page 22
PROMOTER OF THE COMPANY
P. Narendranath Chowdary
Chairman
Page 23
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Chairman
P. Narendranath Chowdary
Chairman
Managing Director
J. Murali Mohan
Directors
Mullapudi Thimmaraja
Y. Narayana Chowdary
V. S. Raju
K. Srinivasa Rao
M. Gopala Krishna
Subbarao V. Tipirneni
Page 24
BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Name Designation
M. Gopalakrishna Director
V S Raju Director
Page 25
PRODUCTS OF THE COMPANY
Coconut Oil
Products:-
Fatty Acids
Stearic Acid
Oleic Acid
Toilet Soaps
Refined Glycerin
Industrial Oxygen
Application of products:-
Page 26
Satiric Acid Rubber products like tires, tubes, thread, rubber and other rubber
mouldings, PVC Rigid Pipes, Cement Paints, Cosmetics, Pharmaceuticals, Syrups,
Metallic Strearate.
Electrolyser
Cell Room
Oxygen Plant
Faker section
Glycerin Distillation
Degumming plant
Soap plant
Page 27
Power plant
Page 28
Future Prospects:-
Separation and purification of fat and oils is an important aspect of this fatty
acid industry and modern development in these lines have expanded the field of
application of fatty acid to industries like plastics, fibers, surfactants, etc. The
development in the field of non-edible oils and their increasing availability put
pressure on the fatty acid industry for development.
1. Saturated:
Ex: Lauric Acid
Mysteric Acid
Palmitic Acid
Stearic Acid
Page 29
2. Unsaturated:
Ex: Oleic Acid
Linoleic Acid
2. Vegetable Oils:
Neem oil
Palm oil
Castor oil
Coconut oil
Rice Bran oil
Mostly in use in countries likes Japan, Burma and Thailand.
Page 30
PROCESS ARRANGEMENT
Batcher Tank
Feed Tank
Autoclave
Catalyst mixer
Discharge Vessel
Candle Filter
Page 31
FATTY ACID / STEARIC ACID MANUFACTURING:-
Raw material
FA Distillation
Residue
Flaking
Page 32
REFINED GLYCERINE MANUFACTURING
Raw material
Sweet water
Chemical Treatment
(To remove impurities)
Evaporation
(To remove water)
Crude Glycerin
Glycerin Distillation
Refined Glycerin
Page 33
MAKING OF SOAP NOODLES / SOAP
Neat soap
Spray drying
(To reduce moisture to desired level)
Soap Noodles
Amalgamation
(Adding up of color, perfume)
Milling (homogenate)
Finished Soap
Page 34
COMPETITORS OF THE COMPANY
JAY IMPEX
HIMANI DETERGENTS
Page 35
POLICIES
Investment Policies :-
The company has setup Rs.3.3. Crore fatty acid and soap project and
turnkey basis through M/S Ball Stra (India) Ltd, Bombay with technology and
equipment of G.M.B., Italy.
Industrial Licensing:-
As the value of fixed assets envisaged in the project is less than Rs.3.3.
Crores the industrial license is not required for setting of this project. The company
has been registered with Directorate General of Technological Development
(DGTD), Government of India, New Delhi bearing No.DGTD/HQ/D-S-S/R-4733/C-
26(N)SE/79 with their letter No. soap dated 21-5-1979 and soap 12(37)79 dated 31-
3-1990 for the manufacture of
2. Glycerin
Page 36
3. Toilet Soaps
31-3-2015
Promoters 55.02%
Public 30.63%
Page 37
Mile-stones and achievements:
manufactures soaps.
2. Jocil supplies different grades of Stearic Acid and other fatty acids to
etc.
Company.
The company has implemented this letter by increasing installation capacity of fatty
acids plant from 6,205 M.T. per annum to 15,510 M.T. with effect from February,
2015
Page 38
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Opportunities:
Threats :
Imports
Tax and regulatory structure
Slowdown in rural demand
Page 39
THEORETICAL FRAME WORK
The assets of a company can be financed either by increasing the owners claim or the
creditors claim. The owners claims increase when the form raises funds by issuing ordinary
shares or by retaining the earnings, the creditors claims increase by borrowing .The various
means of financing represents the financial structure of an enterprise .The financial
structure of an enterprise is shown by the left hand side (liabilities plus equity) of the balance
sheet. Traditionally, short-term borrowings are excluded from the list of methods of financing
the firms capital expenditure, and therefore, the long term claims are said to form the capital
structure of the enterprise .The capital structure is used to represent the proportionate
relationship between debt and equity .Equity includes paid-up share capital, share premium
and reserves and surplus.
LEVERAGE: The use of fixed charges of funds such as preference shares, debentures and
term-loans along with equity capital structure is described as financial leverage or trading
on.Equity. The term trading on equity is used because for raising debt.
DEBT /EQUITY RATIO-Financial institutions while sanctioning long-term loans insists that
companies should generally have a debt equity ratio of 2:1 for medium and large scale
industries and 3:1 indicates that for every unit of equity the company has, it can raise 2 units
of debt. The debt-equity ratio indicates the relative proportions of capital contribution by
creditors and shareholders.
The other factors that should be considered whenever a capital structure decision is
taken are
Page 40
Cost of capital
Cash flow projections of the company
Size of the company
Dilution of control
Floatation costs
FEATURES OF AN OPTIMAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE:
2. FLEXIBILITY: - The capital structure should be flexible to be able to meet the changing
conditions .The company should be able to raise funds whenever the need arises and costly to
continue with particular sources.
3. CONTROL: - The capital structure should involve minimum dilution of control of the
company.
4. SOLVENCY: - The use of excessive debt threatens the solvency of the company. In a high
interest rate environment, Indian companies are beginning to realize the advantage of low
debt.
There are different views on how capital structure influences value. Some argue that
there is no relationship what so ever between capital structure and firm value; other believe
that financial leverage (i.e., the use of debt capital) has a positive effect on firm value up to a
point and negative effect thereafter; still others contend that, other things being equal, greater
the leverage, greater the value of the firm.
Page 41
CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND PLANNING:
Capital structure refers to the mix of long-term sources of funds. Such as debentures,
long-term debt, preference share capital including reserves and surplus (i.e., retained
earnings) The board of directors or the chief financial officer (CEO) of a company should
develop an appropriate capital structure, which are most factors to the company. This can be
done only when all those factors which are relevant to the companys capital structure
decision are properly analyzed and balanced. The capital structure should be planned
generally keeping in view the interests of the equity shareholders, being the owners of the
company and the providers of risk capital (equity) would be concerned about the ways of
financing a companys operations. However, the interests of other groups, such as employees,
customers, creditors, society and government, should also be given reasonable consideration.
When the company lays down its objective in terms of the shareholders wealth
maximization (SWM), it is generally compatible with the interests of other groups. Thus
while developing an appropriate capital structure for its company, the financial manager
should inter alia aim at maximizing the long-term market price per share. Theoretically, there
may be a precise point or range within an industry there may be a range of an appropriate
capital structure with in which there would not be great differences in the market value per
share.
One way to get an idea of this range is to observe the capital structure patterns of
companies vis--vis their market prices of shares. It may be found empirically that there are
not significant differences in the share values within a given range. The management of a
company may fix its capital structure near the top of this range in order to make maximum
use of favorable leverage, subject to other requirements such as flexibility, solvency, control
and norms set by the financial institutions, the security exchange Board of India (SEBI) and
stock exchanges.
The board of Director or the chief financial officer (CEO) of a company should
develop an appropriate capital structure, which is most advantageous to the company. This
can be done only when all those factors, which are relevant to the companys capital structure
decision, are properly analyzed and balanced. The capital structure should be planned
Page 42
generally keeping in view the interest of the equity shareholders and financial requirements
of the company. The equity shareholders being the shareholders of the company and the
providers of the risk capital (equity) would be concerned about the ways of financing a
companys operation. However, the interests of the other groups, such as employees,
customer, creditors, and government, should also be given reasonable consideration.
RETURN: the capital structure of the company should be most advantageous, subject to the
other considerations; it should generate maximum returns to the shareholders without adding
additional cost to them.
RISK: the use of excessive debt threatens the solvency of the company. To the point debt
does not add significant risk it should be used otherwise it uses should be avoided.
CAPACITY: - The capital structure should be determined within the debt capacity of the
company and this capacity should not be exceeded. The debt capacity of the company
depends on its ability to generate future cash flows. It should have enough cash flows to pay
creditors, fixed charges and principal sum.
CONTROL: The capital structure should involve minimum risk of loss of control of the
company. The owner of the closely held companys of particularly concerned about dilution
of the control.
The capital structure will be planned initially when a company is incorporated .The
initial capital structure should be designed very carefully. The management of the company
should set a target capital structure and the subsequent financing decision should be made
Page 43
with the a view to achieve the target capital structure .The financial manager has also to deal
with an existing capital structure .The company needs funds to finance its activities
continuously. Every time when fund shave to be procured, the financial manager weighs the
pros and cons of various sources of finance and selects the most advantageous sources
keeping in the view the target capital structure. Thus, the capital structure decision is a
continues one and has to be taken whenever a firm needs additional Finances.
The following are the three most important approaches to decide about a firms
capital structure.
We shall emphasize some of the main conclusions here .The use of fixed cost sources
of finance, such as debt and preference share capital to finance the assets of the company, is
known as financial leverage or trading on equity. If the assets financed with the use of debt
yield a return greater than the cost of debt, the earnings per share also increases without an
increase in the owners investment.
The earnings per share also increase when the preference share capital is used to acquire
the assets. But the leverage impact is more pronounced in case of debt because
The cost of debt is usually lower than the cost of performance share capital
The interest paired on debt is tax deductible
Because of its effect on the earnings per share, financial leverage is an important
consideration in planning the capital structure of a company. The companies with high level
of the earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) can make profitable use of the high degree of
leverage to increase return on the shareholders equity. One common method of examining
the impact of leverage is to analyze the relationship between EPS and various possible levels
of EBIT under alternative methods of financing.
Page 44
The EBIT-EPS analysis is an important tool in the hands of financial manager to get
an insight into the firms capital structure management .He can considered the possible
fluctuations in EBIT and examine their impact on EPS under different financial plans of the
probability of earning a rate of return on the firms assets less than the cost of debt is
insignificant, a large amount of debt can be used by the firm to increase the earning for share.
This may have a favorable effect on the market value per share. On the other hand, if the
probability of earning a rate of return on the firms assets less than the cost of debt is very
high, the firm should refrain from employing debt capital .it may, thus, be concluded that the
greater the level of EBIT and lower the probability of down word fluctuation, the more
beneficial it is to employ debt in the capital structure However, it should be realized that the
EBIT EPS is a first step in deciding about a firms capital structure .It suffers from certain
limitations and doesnt provide unambiguous guide in determining the capital structure of a
firm in practice.
RATIO ANALYSIS:
The primary user of financial statements are evaluating part performance and
predicting future performance and both of these are facilitated by comparison. Therefore the
focus of financial analysis is always on the crucial information contained in the financial
statements. This depends on the objectives and purpose of such analysis. The purpose of
evaluating such financial statement is different form person to person depending on its
relationship. In other words even though the business unit itself and shareholders, debenture
holders, investors etc. all under take the financial analysis differs. For example, trade
creditors may be interested primarily in the liquidity of a firm because the ability of the
business unit to play their claims is best judged by means of a thorough analysis of its
l9iquidity. The shareholders and the potential investors may be interested in the present and
the future earnings per share, the stability of such earnings and comparison of these earnings
with other units in thee industry. Similarly the debenture holders and financial institutions
lending long-term loans maybe concerned with the cash flow ability of the business unit to
pay back the debts in the long run. The management of business unit, it contrast, looks to the
financial statements from various angles. These statements are required not only for the
managements own evaluation and decision making but also for internal control and overall
performance of the firm. Thus the scope extent and means of any financial analysis vary as
Page 45
per the specific needs of the analyst. Financial statement analysis is a part of the larger
information processing system, which forms the very basis of any decision making process.
The financial analyst always needs certain yardsticks to evaluate the efficiency and
performance of business unit. The one of the most frequently used yardsticks is ratio analysis.
Ratio analysis involves the use of various methods for calculating and interpreting financial
ratios to assess the performance and status of the business unit.
However, it must be noted that ratio analysis merely highlights the potential areas of
concern or areas needing immediate attention but it does not come out with the conclusion as
regards causes of such deviations from the norms. For instance, ABC Ltd. Introduced the
concept of ratio analysis by calculating the variety of ratios and comparing the same with
norms based on industry averages. While comparing the inventory ratio was 22.6 as
compared to industry average turnover ratio of 11.2. However on closer sell tiny due to large
variation from the norms, it was found that the business units inventory level during the year
was kept at extremely low level. This resulted in numerous production held sales and lower
profits. In other words, what was initially looking like an extremely efficient inventory
management, turned out to be a problem area with the help of ratio analysis? As a matter of
caution, it must however be added that a single ration or two cannot generally provide that
necessary details so as to analyze the overall performance of the business unit.
Page 46
Similarly, while doing the inter-firm comparison, the variations may be due to
different technologies or degree of risk in those units or items to be examined are in fact the
comparable only. It must be mentioned here that if ratios are used to evaluate operating
performance, these should exclude extra ordinary items because there are regarded as non-
recurring items that do not reflect normal performance.
Ratio analysis is the systematic process of determining and interpreting the numerical
relationship various pairs of items derived form the financial statements of a business.
Absolute figures do not convey much tangible meaning and is not meaningful while
comparing the performance of one business with the other.
It is very important that the base (or denominator) selected for each ratio is relevant
with the numerator. The two must be such that one is closely connected and is influenced by
the other.
Capital structure or leverage ratios are used to analyze the long-term solvency or
stability of a particular business unit. The short-term creditors are interested in current
financial position and use liquidity ratios. The long-term creditors world judge the soundness
of a business on the basis of the long-term financial strength measured in terms of its ability
to pay the interest regularly as well as repay the installment on due dates. This long-term
solvency can be judged by using leverage or structural ratios.
2. Regular payment of interest, there are thus two different but mutually dependent and
interrelated types of leverage ratio such as:
The value of the firm depends upon its expected earnings stream and the rate used to
discount this stream. The rate used to discount earnings stream its the firms required rate of
return or the cost of capital. Thus, the capital structure decision can affect the value of the
firm either by changing the expected earnings of the firm, but it can affect the reside earnings
Page 47
of the shareholders. The effect of leverage on the cost of capital is not very clear. Conflicting
opinions have been expressed on this issue. In fact, this issue is one of the most continuous
areas in the theory of finance, and perhaps more theoretical and empirical work has been
done on this subject than any other.
If leverage affects the cost of capital and the value of the firm, an optimum capital
structure would be obtained at that combination of debt and equity that maximizes the total
value of the firm or minimizes the weighted average cost of capital. The question of the
existence of optimum use of leverage has been put very succinctly by Ezra Solomon in the
following words.
Given that a firm has certain structure of assets, which offers net operating earnings of
given size and quality, and given a certain structure of rates in the capital markets, is there
some specific degree of financial leverage at which the market value of the firms securities
will be higher than at other degrees of leverage?
The existence of an optimum capital structure is not accepted by all. These exist two
extreme views and middle position. David Durand identified the two extreme views the net
income and net operating approaches.
Under the net income approach (NI), the cost of debt and cost of equity are assumed
to be independent to the capital structure. The weighted average cost of capital declines and
the total value of the firm rise with increased use of leverage.
Under the net operating income (NOI) approach, the cost of equity is assumed to
increase linearly with average. As a result, the weighted average cost of capital remains
constant and the total value of the firm also remains constant as leverage is changed.
3. Traditional Approach:
According to this approach, the cost of capital declines and the value of the firm
increases with leverage up to a prudent debt level and after reaching the optimum point,
coverage cause the cost of capital to increase and the value of the firm to decline.
Page 48
Thus, if NI approach is valid, leverage is significant variable and financing decisions
have an important effect on the value of the firm. On the other hand, if the NOI approach is
correct then the financing decisions should not be a great concern to the financing manager,
as it does not matter in the valuation of the firm.
Modigliani and Miller (MM) support the NOI approach by providing logically
consistent behavioral justifications in its favor. They deny the existence of an optimum
capital structure between the two extreme views; we have the middle position or intermediate
version advocated by the traditional writers.
Thus these exists an optimum capital structure at which the cost of capital is
minimum. The logic of this view is not very sound. The MM position changes when
corporate taxes are assumed. The interest tax shield resulting from the use of debt adds to the
value of the firm. This advantage reduces the when personal income taxes are considered.
The essence of the net income (NI) approach is that the firm can increase its value or
lower the overall cost of capital by increasing the proportion of debt in the capital structure.
The crucial assumptions of this approach are:
1. The use of debt does not change the risk perception of investors; as a result, the equity
capitalization rate, kc and the debt capitalization rate, kd, remain constant with changes in
leverage.
2. The debt capitalization rate is less than the equity capitalization rate (i.e. kd<ke)
The first assumption implies that, if ke and kd are constant increased use by debt by
magnifying the shareholders earnings will result in higher value of the firm via higher value
of equity consequently the overall or the weighted average cost of capital ko, will decrease.
The overall cost of capital is measured by equation: (1)
It is obvious from equation 1 that, with constant annual net operating income (NOI),
the overall cost of capital would decrease as the value of the firm v increases. The overall
cost of capital ko can also be measured by
Page 49
KO = Ke - (Ke - Kd) D/V
As per the assumptions of the NI approach Ke and Kd are constant and Kd is less than
Ke. Therefore, Ko will decrease as D/V increases. Equation 2 also implies that the overall
cost of capital Ko will be equal to Ke if the form does not employ any debt (i.e. D/V =0), and
that Ko will approach Kd as D/V approaches one.
According to the met operating income approach the overall capitalization rate and
the cost of debt remain constant for all degree of leverage .rA and rD are constant for all
degree of leverage. Given this, the cost of equity can be expressed as.
The critical premise of this approach is that the market capitalizes the firm as a whole
at discount rate, which is independent of the firms debt-equity ratio. As a consequence, the
decision between debt and equity is irrelevant. An increase in the use of debt funds which are
apparently cheaper or offset by an increase in the equity capitalization rate. This happens
because equity investors seek higher compensation as they are exposed to greater risk arising
from increase in the degree of leverages. They raise the capitalization rate rE (lower the price
earnings ratio, as the degree of leverage increase.
The net operating income position has been \advocated eloquently by David Durand.
He argued that the market value of a firm depends on its net operating income and business
risk. The change in the financial leverage employed by a firm cannot change these underlying
factors. It merely changes the distribution of income and risk between debt and equity,
without affecting the total income and risk which influence the market value (or equivalently
the average cost of capital) of the firm. Arguing in a similar vein, Modigliani and Miller, in a
seminal contribution made in 1958, forcefully advanced the proposition that the cost of
capital of a firm is independent of its capital structure.
The cost of a source of finance is the minimum return expected by its suppliers. The
expected return depends on the degree of risk assumed by investors. A high degree of risk is
assumed by shareholders than debt-holders. In the case of debt-holders, the rate of interest is
fixed and the company is legally bound to pay dividends even if the profits are made by the
Page 50
company. The loan of debt-holders is returned within a prescribed period, while shareholders
will have to share the residue only when the company is wound up.
This leads one to conclude that debt is cheaper source of funds than equity. This is
generally the case even when taxes are not considered. The tax deductibility of interest
charges further reduces the cost of debt. The preference share capital is also cheaper than
equity capital, but not as cheap as debt. Thus, using the component, or specific, cost of capital
as criterion for financing decisions and ignoring risk, a firm would always like to employ
debt since it is the cheapest source of funds.
One of the features of a sound capital structure is conservatism does not mean
employing no debt or small amount of debt. Conservatism is related to the fixed charges
created by the use of debt or preference capital in the capital structure and the firms ability to
generate cash to meet these fixed charges. In practice, the question of the optimum
(appropriate) debt equity mix boils down to the firs ability to service debt without any
threat of insolvency and operating inflexibility. A firm is considered prudently financed if it
is able to service its fixed charges under any reasonably predictable adverse conditions.
The fixed charges of a company include payment of interest, preference dividend and
principal, and they depend on both the amount of loan securities and the terms of payment.
The amount of fixed charges will be high if the company employs a large amount of debt or
preference capital with short-term maturity. Whenever a company thinks of raising additional
debt, it should analyze its expected future cash flows to meet the fixed charges. It is
mandatory to pay interest and return the principal amount of debt of a company not able to
generate enough cash to meet its fixed obligation; it may have to face financial insolvency.
The companies expecting larger and stable cash inflows in to employ fixed charge sources of
finance by those companies whose cash inflows are unstable and unpredictable.
It is possible for high growth, profitable company to suffer from cash shortage if the
liquidity (working capital) management is poor. We have examples of companies like BHEL,
NTPC, etc., whose debtors are very sticky and they continuously face liquidity problem in
spite of being profitability servicing debt is very burdensome for them.
Page 51
One important ratio which should be examined at the time of planning the capital
structure is the ration of net cash inflows to fixed changes (debt saving ratio). It indicates the
number of times the fixed financial obligation are covered by the net cash inflows generated
by the company.
EPS is one of the mostly widely used measures of the companys performance in
practice. As a result of this, in choosing between debt and equity in practice, sometimes too
much attention is paid on EPS, which however, has serious limitations as a financing-
decision criterion.
The major short coming of the EPS as a financing-decision criterion is that it does not
consider risk; it ignores variability about the expected value of EPS. The belief that investors
would be just concerned with the expected EPS is not well founded. Investors in valuing the
shares of the company consider both expected value and variability.
The EPS variability resulting form the use of leverage is called financial risk.
Financial risk is added with the use of debt because of
(b) The threat of insolvency. A firm can avid financial risk altogether if it does not employ
any debt in its capital structure. But then the shareholders will be deprived of the benefit of
the financial risk perceived by the shareholders, which does not exceed the benefit of increase
EPS. As we have seen, if a company increase its debt beyond a point the expected EPS will
continue to increase but the value of the company increases its debt beyond a point, the
expected EPS will continue to increase, but the value of the company will fall because of the
greater exposure of shareholders to financial risk in the form of financial distress. The EPS
criterion does not consider the long-term perspectives of financing decisions. It fails to deal
with the risk return trade-off. A long term view of the effects of the financing decisions, will
lead one to a criterion of the wealth maximization rather that EPS maximization. The EPS
criterion is an important performance measure but not a decision criterion.
Page 52
Given limitations, should the EPS criterion be ignored in making financing decision?
Remember that it is an important index of the firms performance and that investors rely
heavily on it for their investment decisions. Investors do not have information in the
projected earnings and cash flows and base their evaluation and historical data. In choosing
between alternative financial plans, management should start with the evaluation of the
impact of each alternative on near-term EPS. But managements ultimate decision making
should be guided by the best interests of shareholders.
Therefore, a long-term view of the effect of the alternative financial plans on the
value of the shares should be taken, o management opts for a financial plan which will
maximize value in the long run but has an adverse impact in near-term EPS, and the reasons
must be communicated to investors. A careful communication to market will be helpful in
reducing the misunderstanding between management and Investors.
The board of Director or the chief financial officer (CEO) of a company should
develop an appropriate capital structure, which is most advantageous to the company. This
can be done only when all those factors, which are relevant to the companys capital structure
decision, are properly analyzed and balanced. The capital structure should be planned
generally keeping in view the interest of the equity shareholders and financial requirements
of the company. The equity shareholders being the shareholders of the company and the
providers of the risk capital (equity) would be concerned about the ways of financing a
companys operation. However, the interests of the other groups, such as employees,
customer, creditors, and government, should also be given reasonable consideration. When
the company lay down its objectives in terms of the shareholders wealth maximizing (SWM),
it is generally compatible with the interest of the other groups. Thus, while developing an
appropriate capital structure for it company, the financial manager should inter alia aim at
maximizing the long-term market price per share. Theoretically there may be a precise point
of range with in which the market value per share is maximum. In practice for most
companies with in an industry there may be a range of appropriate capital structure with in
which there would not be great differences in the market value per share. One way to get an
Page 53
idea of this range is to observe the capital structure patterns of companies Vis-a Vis their
market prices of shares. It may be found empirically that there is no significance in the
differences in the share value within a given range. The management of the company may fit
its capital structure near the top of its range in order to make of maximum use of favorable
leverage, subject to other requirement (SEBI) and stock exchanges.
Capital Structure Matters: The Net Income Approach:
The essence of the net income (NI) approach is that the firm can increase its value or
lower the overall cost of capital by increasing the proportion of debt in the capital structure.
The crucial assumptions of this approach are:
1. The use of debt does not change the risk perception of investors; as a result, the equity
capitalization rate, kc and the debt capitalization rate, kd, remain constant with changes in
leverage.
2. The debt capitalization rate is less than the equity capitalization rate (i.e. kd<ke)
The first assumption implies that, if ke and kd are constant increased use by debt by
magnifying the shareholders earnings will result in higher value of the firm via higher value
of equity consequently the overall or the weighted average cost of capital ko, will decrease.
The overall cost of capital is measured by equation: (1)
It is obvious from equation 1 that, with constant annual net operating income (NOI), the
overall cost of capital would decrease as the value of the firm v increases. The overall cost of
capital ko can also be measured by
Page 54
overall cost of capital Ko will be equal to Ke if the form does not employ any debt (i.e. D/V
=0), and that Ko will approach Kd as D/V approaches one.
NET OPERATING INCOME APPROACH
According to the met operating income approach the overall capitalization rate and the cost of
debt remain constant for all degree of leverage.
rA and rD are constant for all degree of leverage. Given this, the cost of equity can be
expressed as.
The critical premise of this approach is that the market capitalizes the firm as a whole
at discount rate, which is independent of the firms debt-equity ratio. As a consequence, the
decision between debt and equity is irrelevant. An increase in the use of debt funds which are
apparently cheaper or offset by an increase in the equity capitalization rate. This happens
because equity investors seek higher compensation as they are exposed to greater risk arising
from increase in the degree of leverages. They raise the capitalization rate rE (lower the price
earnings ratio, as the degree of leverage increases.
Page 55
The net operating income position has been \advocated eloquently by David
Durand. He argued that the market value of a firm depends on its net operating income and
business risk. The change in the financial leverage employed by a firm cannot change these
underlying factors. It merely changes the distribution of income and risk between debt and
equity, without affecting the total income and risk which influence the market value (or
equivalently the average cost of capital) of the firm. Arguing in a similar vein, Modigliani
and Miller, in a seminal contribution made in 1958, forcefully advanced the proposition that
the cost of capital of a firm is independent of its capital structure.
The cost of a source of finance is the minimum return expected by its suppliers. The
expected return depends on the degree of risk assumed by investors. A high degree of risk is
assumed by shareholders than debt-holders. In the case of debt-holders, the rate of interest is
fixed and the company is legally bound to pay dividends even if the profits are made by the
company. The loan of debt-holders is returned within a prescribed period, while shareholders
will have to share the residue only when the company is wound up.
This leads one to conclude that debt is cheaper source of funds than equity. This is
generally the case even when taxes are not considered. The tax deductibility of interest
charges further reduces the cost of debt. The preference share capital is also cheaper than
equity capital, but not as cheap as debt. Thus, using the component, or specific, cost of capital
as criterion for financing decisions and ignoring risk, a firm would always like to employ
debt since it is the cheapest source of funds.
One of the features of a sound capital structure is conservatism does not mean
employing no debt or small amount of debt. Conservatism is related to the fixed charges
created by the use of debt or preference capital in the capital structure and the firms ability to
generate cash to meet these fixed charges. In practice, the question of the optimum
(appropriate) debt equity mix boils down to the firms ability to service debt without any
threat of insolvency and operating inflexibility. A firm is considered prudently financed if it
is able to service its fixed charges under any reasonably predictable adverse conditions.
Page 56
The fixed charges of a company include payment of interest, preference dividend and
principal, and they depend on both the amount of loan securities and the terms of payment.
The amount of fixed charges will be high if the company employs a large amount of debt or
preference capital with short-term maturity. Whenever a company thinks of raising additional
debt, it should analyze its expected future cash flows to meet the fixed charges. It is
mandatory to pay interest and return the principal amount of debt of a company not able to
generate enough cash to meet its fixed obligation; it may have to face financial insolvency.
The companies expecting larger and stable cash inflows in to employ fixed charge sources of
finance by those companies whose cash inflows are unstable and unpredictable.
It is possible for high growth, profitable company to suffer from cash shortage if the
liquidity (working capital) management is poor. We have examples of companies like BHEL,
NTPC, etc., whose debtors are very sticky and they continuously face liquidity problem in
spite of being profitability servicing debt is very burdensome for them.
One important ratio which should be examined at the time of planning the capital
structure is the ration of net cash inflows to fixed changes (debt saving ratio). It indicates the
number of times the fixed financial obligation are covered by the net cash inflows generated
by the company.
The major short coming of the EPS as a financing-decision criterion is that it does not
consider risk; it ignores variability about the expected value of EPS. The belief that investors
would be just concerned with the expected EPS is not well founded. Investors in valuing the
shares of the company consider both expected value and variability.
The EPS variability resulting form the use of leverage is called financial risk.
Financial risk is added with the use of debt because of
Page 57
(a) The increased variability in the shareholders earnings and
A firm can avid financial risk altogether if it does not employ any debt in its capital
structure. But then the shareholders will be deprived of the benefit of the financial risk
perceived by the shareholders, which does not exceed the benefit of increase EPS. As we
have seen, if a company increase its debt beyond a point the expected EPS will continue to
increase but the value of the company increases its debt beyond a point, the expected EPS
will continue to increase, but the value of the company will fall because of the greater
exposure of shareholders to financial risk in the form of financial distress. The EPS criterion
does not consider the long-term perspectives of financing decisions. It fails to deal with the
risk return trade-off. A long term view of the effects of the financing decisions, will lead one
to a criterion of the wealth maximization rather that EPS maximization. The EPS criterion is
an important performance measure but not a decision criterion.
Given limitations, should the EPS criterion be ignored in making financing decision?
Remember that it is an important index of the firms performance and that investors rely
heavily on it for their investment decisions. Investors do not have information in the
projected earnings and cash flows and base their evaluation and historical data. In choosing
between alternative financial plans, management should start with the evaluation of the
impact of each alternative on near-term EPS. But managements ultimate decision making
should be guided by the best interests of shareholders.
Therefore, a long-term view of the effect of the alternative financial plans on the
value of the shares should be taken, o management opts for a financial plan which will
maximize value in the long run but has an adverse impact in near-term EPS, and the reasons
must be communicated to investors. A careful communication to market will be helpful in
reducing the misunderstanding between management and Investors.
Page 58
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
GRAPH NO -1
Total debt
Debt Ratio =
Capital employed
INTERPRETATION
The equity of Jocil limited., in 2011was 443686 thousand rupees, in 2012 was
608914 thousand rupees, it was increased to 862832 thousand rupees in 2013 and in 2014it
was decreased to 315765 thousand rupees. And again it was increased to 488100 thousand
rupees in 2015. Increased equity will increase the risk of share holders.
Page 59
Equity of JOCIL LIMITED.
TABLE NO-2
Year Equity (Rs in thousands)
2011-12 596209
2012-13 524719
2013-14 734342
2014-15 1004935
2015-16 1364328
GRAPH NO-2
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Page 60
Debt equity ratio of JOCIL LIMITED.,
TABLE NO -3
Year Debt Equity ratio (in %)
2011-12 0.74
2012-13 1.16
2013-14 0.52
2014-15 0.31
2015-16 0.36
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
INTERPRETATION
In debt equity ratio of Jocil limited.In 2011 was 0.74, in 2012 was increased to 1.16, in 2013
was decreased to 0.52 in 2014 was again decreased to 0.31 and it 2015 it was increased to
0.36.
Page 61
Operating Leverage
Operating leverage may be defined as the employment of an asset with a fixed cost in the
hope that sufficient revenue will be generated to our all the fixed and variable costs. The use
of assets for which a company phase a fixed cost is called operating leverage.
Contribution
Operating leverage =
EBIT
OPERATING LEVERAGE
TABLE NO -4
S. no Year Contribution (Rs) EBIT (Rs) O. L
1 2011-12 803382000 741385204 1.08
2 2012-13 1055524000 975054011 1.08
3 2013-14 500054000 399904461 1.25
4 2014-15 228074000 122136440 1.87
5 2015-16 327026000 218491015 1.50
Mean 1.36
GRAPH NO4.4
100
90
80 East
70 West
60 North
50
40
30
20
10
0
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
Page 62
INTERPRETATION
Page 63
DEGREE OF OPERATING LEVERAGE
The degree of operating leverage is equal to the percentage increase in the
net operating income to the percentage increase in the output.
% in EBIT
Degree of operating leverage =
% in sales
TABLE NO 5
% change in % change in
S. no Year DOL
EBIT sales
Mean 4.41
Page 64
Degree of operating leverage
GRAPH NO 5
12
10
8
Year
6 % change in EBIT
4 % change in sales
DOL
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 Mean
-2
INTERPRETATION
The degree of operating leverage (DOL) of Jocil limited. The Degree of Operating
Leverage measure the relationship between earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and sales.
The mean value of calculated 4.41 in 2014-15 the degree of operating leverage is higher
(9.85) and in 2013-14 the degree of operating leverage is low (1.36). The higher degree of
operating leverage prefers more earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) from sales, on the
other and low degree of operating leverage refers less earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)
from sales. By comparing previous year 2015-16 the degree of operating leverage is rapidly
decline.
Page 65
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE
The financial leverage may be defined as the use of funds with a fixed cost in order
to increase earnings per share in other words, it is the use of company funds on which it pays
a limited return.
EBIT
Financial leverage =
EAT
Financial Leverage
TABLE NO 6
Mean 1.22
Page 66
GRAPH NO.6
2.5E+09
2E+09
1.5E+09 F. L
EBIT (Rs)
EBIT (Rs)
1E+09
Year
500000000
0
1 2 3 4 5 Mean
INTERPRETATION
a. RETURN ON ASSETS
In this case profits are related to assets as follows
Total assets
Page 67
TABLE NO7
Particulars 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
TABLE NO.8
PAT
17 12 .14 15 21
Total Capital Emp 193 177 206 212 232
ROCE
0.088 0.0676 0.0685 0.07077 0.09058
Page 68
CAPITAL STRUCTURE/LEVERAGE RATIOS
The capital structure/ leverage ratios may be defined as those financial ratios
which measures the long term stability and structure of the firm.
These ratios indicate the mix of funds provided by owners and lenders and
a) Equity ratio
The high ratio here means less protection for creditors. A low
Page 69
THE FORMS OF FUNDS MOBILIZATION IS ILLUSTRATED BY A CHART
CONVENTION NON-
EQUITY RETAINED PREFERENCE AL CONVENTIONAL
CAPITL EARNINS CAPITAL SOURCES SOURCES
SUPPLIERS
FINANCIAL CREDIT
INSTITUTION SHORT TERM
BANK
BANK BORROWINGS
CASH CREDIT HIRE PURCHASE
DEBENTURES
FIXED DEPOSITS
ICD
Page 70
YEAR 2011-12
PERFORMANCE OF COMPANY (AMOUNT IN RS. CRS)
TABLE NO :9
Page 71
YEAR 2013-14
PERFORMANCE OF COMPANY (AMOUNT IN RS. CRS S)
TABLE NO 11
Page 72
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF 2014-15
In 2014-15 the company has performed well in all decisions because of high demand
and realizations. The Gross Profit Increased considerably and the interest payments have
Increased at about 23 because of loans taken from the bank at a lesser rate of interest and
payment of loan funds for which the company is paying higher rate of interest.
In the previous year, the cash credit granted by UCO bank to the tune of Rs29 crs and
losing of loan funds borrowed from Vijaya Bank and Canara Bank factors, which can tribute
to increase in the Profit before Tax to the tune of Rs.15crs the company declared a dividend
of 10% on its equity to its shareholders when compared to 7.5% in the previous year. The
EPS of the company also increased considerably which investors in coming period. The
company has taken up a plant expansion program during the year to increase the production
activity and to meet the increase in the demand.
YEAR 2015-16
PERFORMANCE OF COMPANY (AMOUNT IN RS.CRS)
TABLE NO 4.13
Shareholders funds 12 Work in progress 1.74
Page 73
FINDINGS
The debt of company less than EQUITY of the company in all the three years as
against the ideal ratio of 1:1, which implies existence of ideal current assets.
Majority of the funds for the company are financed by long term barrowings.
Page 74
SUGGESTIONS
The basic of above findings the following suggestions are made which are worthy of
consideration by the policy makers of Jocil limited.
The company should give more preference to debt than equity. Debt is a cheaper
source of finance. It reduces the financial risk of shareholders and also increases the
value of firms.
Management tries to increase the EPS value as for the increasing number of shares.
The company should increase capital reserve amount for the future benefits.
The company has to maintain the optimal capital structure and leverage so that in
coming years it can contribute to the wealth of the shareholders.
He mining loyalty contracts should be revised so that it will decrease the direct in the
production
The company has to exercise control over its outside purchases and overheads which
have effect on the profitability of the company.
As the interest rates in pubic Financial institutions are in a decreasing trend after
globalization the company going on searching for loan funds at a less rate of interest
as in the case of UCO Bank.
Efficiency and competency in managing the affairs of the company should be
maintained.
Page 75
CONCLUSION
The above findings are extracted from the analysis and interpretation of the
project that had been done in the Jocil limited. we conclude following things, which are
discussed below.
The company capital structure is placed a major role in the business activities. By
observing the above charts and tables, we conclude that the company debt and equity position
is very good. The company trying for wealth maximization along with the property
maximization.
Therefore the company is in well flourishing stage. That means in the growth stage.
Now the company can go for the expansion plans in order to increase its profit and market.
The PAT (Profit After Tax) in 2014-15 is at 340. The PAT has increased in prices in
Whole cotton industry during the above period. The profit has increased almost 15% during
The period 2013-14.
Debentures were redeemed by transfers to D.R.R. in 2013-14.
A steady transfer for dividend during 2012-13 from P&L appropriation but in
2012-13 there is no adequate dividend equity Shareholders.
The share capital of the company remained in charge during the three-year period
because of no public issues made by the company.
The secured loans have decreased consistently from 2012-13 and slight increase
in 2015-16.
Page 76
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Prasanna Chandra (2006), Financial Management, Tata Mc, Graw Hills, New Delhi,
5th Edition.
I.M. Pandey (2006), Financial Management, Vikas publishing House, New Delhi, 9th
Edition.
My Khan and P.K. Jain (2006), Financial Management, Tata Mc, Graw Hill
publishing company, New Delhi, 6th Edition.
V.K. Bhalla (2006), Financial Management and policy, Anoml Publication pvt
limited, 4th Edition.
Journals
o The management accountant by ICWAI.
Web sites
www.moneycontrol.com
www.wikipedia.com
www.hindujaleylandfinance.com
Page 77
ANNEXURE
BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH 2012
Schedule As at 31st March As at 31st March
2012 2011
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Shareholders funds
Share capital A 11,33,85,050 11,33,85,050
Reserves and surplus B 1,27,84,18,716 90,12,44,947
1,39,18,03,766 1,01,46,29,997
Loan funds
Secured loans C 28,15,50,102 29,64,92,947
Unsecured loans D 21,96,22,000 24,46,95,000
50,11,72,102 54,11,87,947
Page 78
BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH2013
Schedule As at 31st March As at 31st March
2013 2012
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Shareholders funds
Share capital A 11,33,85,050 11,33,85,050
Reserves and surplus B 1,44,75,96,744 1,27,84,18,716
1,56,09,81,794 1,39,18,03,766
Loan funds
Secured loans C 19,36,77,300 28,15,50,102
Unsecured loans D 17,99,22,000 21,96,22,000
37,35,99,300 50,11,72,102
Page 79
BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH 2014
Schedule As at 31st March As at 31st March
2014 2013
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Shareholders funds
Share capital A 11,33,85,050 11,33,85,050
Reserves and surplus B 65,54,81,537 49,62,80,973
76,88,66,587 60,96,66,023
Loan funds
Secured loans C 82,67,28,433 1,03,97,20,204
Unsecured loans D 18,88,33,000 18,75,70,830
1,01,55,61,433 1,22,72,91,034
Page 80
BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH 2015
Schedule As at 31st March As at 31st March
2015 2014
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Shareholders funds
Share capital A 11,33,85,050 11,33,85,050
Reserves and surplus B 1,45,46,89,267 1,43,42,19,329
1,56,80,34,317 1,54,76,04,442
Loan funds
Secured loans C 27,46,77,379 43,88,86,979
Unsecured loans D 23,97,59,000 18,40,00,000
51,44,36,379 62,28,86,979
Deferred tax liability
Deferred tax liability 28,78,93,073 30,13,40,523
Less:- Deferred tax Assets 34,18,50,93 4,74,62,323
25,37,07,980 25,38,78,200
TOTAL 233,61,78,676 242,43,69,621
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
Fixed assets
Gross block E 217,85,03,874 2,16,25,26,621
Less: Depreciation 79,66,49,926 70,11,93,785
Net block 138,18,53,948 146,13,32,836
Capital working progress 1,40,65,017 1,44,95,59,4
139,59,18,965 147,58,28,430
Investments 5,38,45,587
F 5,36,53,134
Current assets, loan and advances
Inventories G 128,45,84,247 126,77,78,839
Sundry debtors H 3,62,65,260 6,09,19,4285
Cash and bank balance I 57,86,88,27 20,84,05,389
Other current assets J 18,15,538 23,12,881
Loans and advances K 21,44,20,338 20,23,86,069
159,49,54,210 1,74,18,02,606
Less: current liabilities
Current liabilities 59,53,89,436 73,47,84,951
Provisions 11,31,50,650 11,21,29,598
Page 81
BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH 2016
Schedule As at 31st March As at 31st March
2016 2015
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Shareholders funds
Share capital A 11,33,85,050 11,33,85,050
Reserves and surplus B 159,25,95,072 145,46,49,267
170,59,80,122 156,80,34,317
Loan funds
Secured loans C 15,08,00,5833 27,46,77,379
Unsecured loans D 27,0,75,000 22,97,59,,000
42,38,75,583 51,44,36,379
Page 82