Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scenario B: Aktau does not win traffic back from the Odessa route, and Kuryk handles only
Kashagans exports. On this basis, Aktaus traffic would reach peaks of 18-19 million tonnes in
2011-2013, and then settle down in the range 8-9 million tonnes
Dry Cargo: For dry cargo the projected future volumes are well above the AISCP forecast. The
main reasons for the higher forecast are (i) the exports planned by the new fertiliser plant, (ii)
the additional grain exports likely to result from the new export strategy of JSC Ak Biday and
their investment in new coastal silos in Iran, Azerbaijabn and Georgia, and (iii) imports of
construction materials and later consumer goods from Dubai and Turkey for the New City.
Steel exports to Iran account for a large proportion of Aktaus dry cargo. Mittal and Castings
have forecast that future exports will rise to about 1.5 million tonnes via Aktau by 2010. This
may seems slightly high; as Mittal has no plans to increase production at present (its investment
programme is focussing on quality improvements). But Castings is planning an increase in
production of 0.4 million tonnes equivalent to a 10% increase in national production - and the
Iranian and Kazakhstan governments recently agreed to an Iranian company constructing a
modern steel plant in Kazakhstan. Given the strong growth of imports into Iran, and the fact that
the fast-growing Kazakh economy has a well-established steel in Kazakhstan dominated by
Mittal, it seems likely that the steel exports via Aktau will increase. However, in view of the
negligible growth in recent years it has been assumed that future growth will be modest, at
around 5% p.a.
In the longer term the Special Economic Zone should generate additional traffic, but it will take
time. None of the projects currently in the pipeline will generate significant port traffic, and no
distribution companies, which are the key players at other successful SEZs such as Jebel Ali,
have yet been set up in the SEZ. Also, additional traffic may be attracted away from their
overland overland current routes to Novorossiysk and Ukrainian ports on to Traceca routes via
Aktau - if key reforms are carried out, especially in rail pricing and cross border procedures. But
these reforms will take time. They have been under discussion for several years and there is
little sign of progress as yet.
Total Volumes: The following Table 4 summarizes the total projected volumes (oil volumes are
based on Scenario A):
11
Aktau Port Development, Masterplanning & Feasibility Study
1.7 Additional berths needed in Existing Port and North Port: 2008 to 2020
To handle the projected volumes additional facilities and berths will be needed in both the
existing and North port.
Existing Port: To a certain extent some of the projected volumes can be handled by increasing
the capacity of the existing port by relatively minor modifications to the existing berths. These
modifications would result in the following revised port capacity:
North Port: As can be seen in Figures 1, 2 and 3 below the upgrades to the existing port will
not be sufficient to meet all traffic requirements over the forecasting period. In addition to the
upgrading work in the existing port, additional berths will be required in the North Port. In the
case of oil however, the peak demand for new berths will be relatively short-lived under all three
Scenarios, A, B and C.
The peak will occur around 2012-2013, after which traffic will settle down to lower levels. It
should also be noted that, as mentioned above, the current total pipeline/rail throughput
capacity of oil is 14.1 to 14.3 mt/y. which is similar to the capacity of the existing port after
upgrading works. Therefore any further investment in berths, as in the North Port, will need to
be matched by investment in new pipelines or rail if the potential of the new berths is to be
realised.
In the case of dry cargo the situation is more straightforward and but may in the longer term,
after 2020, reach the situation where the three possible dry cargo berths are insufficient and a
reconfiguration of the North Port will then be required to provide space for additional berths.
As in the case of oil the capacity of the mainline rail will need to be increased in parallel with the
development of the North Port dry cargo berths.
12