Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229277275
CITATIONS READS
10 986
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Joaqun Anbal Orejas on 11 March 2016.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 513}522
Abstract
An industrial process for the direct chlorination of ethylene at low temperatures to yield 1,2-dichloroethane has been considered.
The reactor, whose con"guration corresponds to a bubble column with external recirculation loop, has a working capacity of 19 m
and a production capacity of 54 000 tons of 1,2-dichloroethane per year. In order to describe its operation, the predictions from
a model developed in a previous work were evaluated using a special analysis of experimental data. This enables to obtain both
a model and a numerical simulation program which not only predict various performance variables with satisfactory relative errors
but also have the capacity of representing the in#uence of changes in operating conditions adequately within the entire technically
feasible operating range. 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ethylene chlorination; 1, 2-Dichloroethane production; Bubble-column loop reactor; Airlift reactor; Chemical reactor
0009-2509/01/$ - see front matter 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 0 9 - 2 5 0 9 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 2 5 5 - 4
514 J. A. Orejas / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 513}522
model structure and the numerical simulation program ing numerical simulation program to represent how
are described. In this way, an accurate model and a trust- changes in operating conditions a!ect the predictions
worthy numerical simulation program could "nally be of the reactor's performance. The eight operating
accomplished. In addition to predicting di!erent perfor- conditions described in Table 1 were chosen for this
mance variables with satisfactory relative errors, these purpose.
tools have the capacity of representing the in#uence of The selected sets of conditions comprise the complete
the variations in the operating conditions adequately for variation range which is technically feasible for the vari-
all the technically feasible operative range. ables that de"ne reactor's operation (Fig. 1). Experiment
6, in particular, was the one that had been considered in
detail in a previous paper (Orejas, 1999).
2. Process description The numerical simulation program was employed for
each set of operating conditions so as to describe the
Fig. 1 shows the con"guration of the industrial reactor. reactor's operation and the resulting predictions
Ethylene and chlorine, both in gaseous state, are fed to the were compared with the experimental data obtained
reactor through di!erent distributors. These substances from the industrial reactor. The following performance
are dissolved and di!used, reacting in liquid phase (EDC variables were considered in the analysis: EDC in the
'98% ww) to yield more EDC. The existing di!erence in liquid product, EDC and O in the gaseous e%uent, ETC
density between heterogeneous and thermal-exchange production, chlorine and ethylene conversions, amount
zones enables the recirculation of the liquid phase in the of heat exchanged and recirculation rate.
direction shown in the "gure, thus making it possible to By way of illustration, the accuracy of the predictions
control the reaction temperature (50}703C) by means of can be visualised in Figs. 2}4, where the estimated values
the heat exchanger located in the right branch. Under were plotted against experimental results for ETC pro-
industrial operating conditions, the main reaction is the duction, Cl and C H conversions, respectively. The
addition of chlorine to ethylene's double bond. The impor- numbers 1}8 assigned to each estimated value refer to the
tant secondary products are 1,1,2-trichloroethane (ETC) corresponding experiment in Table 1.
and hydrogen chloride (HCl). The presence of ferric chlor- In terms of relative errors, it is clear from Figs. 2}4 that
ide (FeCl ), which is soluble in the reaction medium, the program's predictions are extremely satisfactory. Re-
favours the selectivity in EDC. sults of similar quality were obtained for all the other
performance variables that were analysed.
In Fig. 4, however, it can be observed that the simula-
3. Model evaluation tion program is unable to represent the in#uence of
changes in the operating conditions on the ethylene con-
Several experiments were carried out in order to assess version, because it predicts 100% conversion for all the
the capacity of the proposed model and the correspond- experiments, which is in total disagreement with the
corresponding experimental values.
In the next section it is described how this limitation
can be analysed in order to overcome it, thus improving
the proposed model.
Table 1
Operating conditions employed in eight experiences
Experiment P (k Pa) (K) Chlorine (kg s\) Ethylene (kg s\) Inert (kg s\);10
-. -.
1 215.35 341.41 1.121 0.439 2.778
2 196.96 335.41 1.657 0.687 2.222
3 260.72 330.44 1.676 0.674 1.389
4 199.41 341.26 1.657 0.677 1.389
5 261.94 342.31 1.114 0.428 1.389
6 260.72 341.30 1.704 0.659 2.778
7 261.94 327.16 1.102 0.428 2.778
8 199.41 327.16 1.102 0.425 1.389
bars) for di!erent parameters of the model. The predic- X
!X
X
!X
X(k , k )" ? ? # @ @
tions were obtained for $50% deviations in the initial X
X
bubble-size estimation (d );$30%, in the total gaseous ? @
TQ
volumetric fraction (1e 2);$20%, in the liquid-phase P
!P
% # 2!# 2!# (1)
mass transfer coe$cient prediction (k );#130 and P
* 2!#
#280%, in the gas-phase mass transfer coe$cient pre-
for each one of the operating conditions considered
diction (k ) and $30%, in the mass axial dispersion
% above, supposing that the heterogeneous zone operates
coe$cient evaluation (D ). Finally, the results obtained
+X isothermally.
by increasing the activation energy of the main reaction
The following expressions for the reaction rate con-
(E ) in 5% (shaded column at the far right of the "gure)
stants were obtained as a result of the adjustment:
and 7% (blank column at the far right of the "gure) have
been included in this "gure. The main conclusion of the k "11493.0 exp(!2156.58/) m kmol\ s\, (2)
analysis is that the kinetic parameters are the only ones
k "8.517;10 exp(!7282.21/) m kmol\ s\. (3)
that a!ect the predicted ethylene conversion signi"cantly.
At this point it is important to remark that the kinetics Figs. 6 and 7 show Arrhenius plots where the predic-
employed in the simulation program was the one, deter- tions from Eqs. (2) and (3) (continuous lines) are com-
mined by SzeH pvoK lgyi and Ujhidy (1978). It was chosen for pared with the best values obtained for each operating
this work because it is the only one published up to now condition (squares). Apart from the results that corres-
that quanti"es the temperature, the secondary reaction pond to the experiments reported in Table 1, the estima-
and the catalyst e!ects. However, the temperatures for tions for four additional operating conditions were also
which it was developed range from 287 to 313 K, while included so as to have more information about the in#u-
the industrial reactor of interest in this paper operates ence of the temperature. The straight lines that corres-
between 327 and 342 K. Therefore, it is reasonable to pond to the extrapolation of the kinetics reported by
expect certain deviations when using those parameters SzeH pvoK lgyi and Ujhidy (1978) were also plotted in these
outside the original temperature range. Taking into "gures.
account the fact that they also proved to be sensitive It can be noticed that globally, the dispersion of the
variables, i.e. those that most signi"cantly a!ected ethy- values of the adjusted constants around the regression
lene-conversion predictions, the kinetic parameters were straight lines (Eqs. (2) and (3)) is somewhat important.
selected as adjustment variables. This is to be expected because in this interpretation the
errors from all sources, such as those introduced by the
other model parameters and even the experimental er-
5. Adjustment of the kinetic parameters rors, are being attributed solely to these two constants.
Nevertheless, the magnitude of these deviations is not
Within the entire operating range, the di!erences in signi"cant when the straight lines given by Eqs. (2) and
temperature between the gas-phase distributors level and (3) are compared with the extrapolation of the kinetics by
J. A. Orejas / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 513}522 517
1P 2>c o w n " j "
N ""k R ? * ! * ? " ?V B
? B , (4) unavailable.
?V *? H PM PM PM The sole adjustment of these two parameters led to
C? ? ? ?
a better model with a simpler numerical simulation pro-
1P 2>c o w n " j "
N ""k R @ * ! * @ " @V B
@ B , (5) gram, which was not only capable of predicting the
@V *@ H PM PM PM
C@ @ @ @ values of various performance variables with good ap-
1P 2>c o w n " j " proximations in terms of relative errors, but also suc-
N ""k R F * ! * F " FV B
F B , (6) ceeded in representing the in#uence of changes in the
FV *F H PM PM PM
CF F F F variables that de"ne the reactor's operation adequately
n " j " for the entire technically feasible range.
N "" RV B
R B "0, (7)
RV PM PM The kinetic expressions obtained as a result of this
R R study are surely far from representing the intrinsic
k 1P 2 P n " chemical kinetics for the reactions involved in this pro-
N "" %A R >! A " AV B , (8)
AV R12 A 1P 2 PM cess. Nevertheless, they have at least allowed a highly
R A
J. A. Orejas / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 513}522 521
satisfactory description of the complex relationship x coordinate inside the di!usion "lms, m
among the various physical, chemical, thermodynamic, > gas-phase molar fraction for the ith species
G
#uid dynamic and transport phenomena that exist in this X ,X ethylene and chlorine conversion, respec-
? @
kind of reactors. Finally, it is important to remark that tively
the improvements achieved in the estimation of the recir- w weight fraction for the ith compound
G
culation rate, which is an experimental variable that is
determined in a totally independent way, provide phys- Greek letters
ical consistency to the parameter adjustment carried out
in the present work. 1e 2 total volumetric fraction in the gas phase
%
U ,U total mass #ow for the gaseous and liquid
+% +*
phases, respectively, kg s\
Notation U ,U mass #ow for the liquid phase at z"0 and
+* +**
z", respectively, kg s\
C molar composition for the ith species, U liquid mass #ow produced by the reactor,
G +*.
kmol m\ kg s\
c molar concentration of the liquid phase, o density in the liquid phase, kg m\
* *
kmol m\ X objective function de"ned in Eq. (1)
D mass axial dispersion coe$cient, m s\
+X Subscripts
d Sauter mean bubble diameter, m
TQ
H Henry's law constant for the ith species,
AG a ethylene
Pa mol-frac\
j interfacial mass #ow density for the ith b chlorine
G c 1,2-dichloroethane
species with respect to the average mass
velocity, kg i m\ s\ h hydrogen chloride
k chemical reaction rate constant, t 1,1,2-trichloroethane
m kmol\ s\
Superscripts
k chemical reaction rate constant,
m kmol\ s\
A gas stream initially rich in ethylene
k gas-phase mass transfer coe$cient for the
%G est., exp. estimated and experimental value, respec-
ith species, m s\
tively
k liquid-phase mass transfer coe$cient for
*G
the ith species, m s\ Other symbols
N interfacial molar #ow density for the ith
GV
species, kmol m\ s\ 1t2 t", t" mean value for variable t in a given cross-
n interfacial mass #ow density for the ith B
GV section variable t evaluated at the liquid
species, kg m\ s\ di!usion "lm for gas A, at x"0 and d,
PM molecular weight of the ith species,
G respectively
kmol kg\
P total pressure, kPa
R Acknowledgements
R gas constant
R reaction rate of the ith chemical reaction,
G The author wishes to thank the support given by the
kmol m\ s\ Science and Technology Secretary of National Univer-
temperature, K sity of RmH o Cuarto (UNRC) and by the Council of Scient-
, cooling water temperatures at the input
!5 !5* i"c and Technological Research of the Province of
and output, respectively, K CoH rdoba (CONICOR) } Argentina.
temperature of the gas phase at the reac-
%
tor's feed, K
References
, liquid-phase temperature at z"0 and
* **
, K Balasubramanian, S. N., Rihani, D. N., & Doraiswamy, L. K. (1966).
operating temperature (temperature at the
-. Film model for ethylene dichloride formation: Absorption and
top of the reactor), K reaction of two gases in a liquid. Industrial and Engineering Chem-
P saturation pressure for EDC, kPa istry, Fundamentals, 5(2), 184}188.
A Chua, Y. H., & Ratcli!e, R. J. (1971). Chlorination of ethylene. Part 1.
P operating pressure (pressure at the top of
-. A reaction model for the simultaneous absorption of two gases
the reactor), accompanied by addition/displacement reactions. Mechanical and
kPa Chemical Engineering Transactions of the Institution of Engineers in
P ETC production, kg s\ Australia, MC7(1), 5}10.
2!#
522 J. A. Orejas / Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 513}522
Hydrocarbon Processing. (1997). Wachi, S., & Morikawa, H. (1986). Liquid-phase chlorination of ethy-
Orejas, J. A. (1999). Modelling and simulation of a bubble- lene and 1,2-dichloroethane. Journal of Chemical Engineers in Japan,
column reactor with external loop: Application to the direct 19(5), 437}443.
chlorination of ethylene. Chemical Engineering Science, 54(21), Wachi, S., & Morikawa, H. (1987). Chlorination of ethylene in a boiling
5299}5309. bubble column reactor. Journal of Chemical Engineers in Japan,
SzeH pvoK lgyi, J., & Ujhidy, A. (1978). Studies on ethylene dichloride 20(3), 238}245.
formation in a rotary "lm reactor. I. Kinetic investigations. Hungar- Westerterp, K. R., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Beenackers, A. A. C. M. (1984).
ian Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 6, 187. Chemical reactor design and operation New York, USA: Wiley.