Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topics
Flow Rate: First, a simple point worth noting. Under a given set of HPLC conditions
(column, temperature, eluent etc) sample components elute in a fixed volume not a fixed
time. If we can assume a constant flow rate, then this equates to a retention time. So if the
retention times of all the peaks change, the first place to look is the flow rate.
To be sure of the flow rate, measure the solvent flow to waste using a small measuring
cylinder (eg 5ml). Also watch the system back pressure. A given flow of the solvent through
the column at a given temperature generates a constant backpressure, therefore if the
backpressure changes so does the flow. Another check of the flow rate is the void volume
peak. If its position has not changed the flow rate is OK. If it has changed, the flow rate has
definitely changed. Low flow rate = longer retention times. Suspect a leak or an air bubble
first.
%B: The concentration of organic modifier in the eluent (%B) has a marked effect on the
retention time. So if the retention times change, check the %B (eg for an eluent of
water:methanol 50:50, %B = methanol concentration ie 50%). This could change because
of the method of mixing (see January 2005 Technical Tip or call give us a call on 01634 294
001) or because the ratio has changed since the eluent was made up. Things to avoid are
old eluents, bottles stood on window sills in the sun and vacuum degassing of premixed
eluents. If in doubt about the eluent, make up fresh eluent, measuring each solvent
separately before mixing.
pH: Changing the pH of a buffer solution may affect retention times. Checking this is part of
method validation, but in some cases retention times vary with pH. Bear in mind that the pH
range for most columns is pH 2-7.
Stationary Phase Degradation: If the pH drops below 2 the bonded phase can be
stripped off the stationary phase. This applies to most columns using the Si-O-Si siloxane
bond to covalently attach the bonded phase. The bond is hydrolised below pH 2, turning
the column, gradually, to a silica column. In this situation you will see a gradual but
irreversible change in retention times.
Air Bubbles: If there is air in the piston chamber or the check valve of the pump the flow
rate is reduced, often in an unreproducible way. This leads to longer and variable retention
times. If this is the situation check for fluctuating back pressure (to confirm the presence of
air bubbles) and purge the system.
Leaks: If a leak develops part of the flow is diverted out of the system and the flow rate
through the column is reduced. Hence the retention times become longer. Leaks generally
occur around piston seals, tubing connectors, injection valves or from PEEK tubing if it is
kinked.
Check Valve Problems: Check valves consist of a ruby ball that allows liquid to flow
through a tube in only one direction. When the flow is in the opposite direction the ball is
pushed back into its seat where it makes a perfect seal and stops the flow. In order for this
to happen the ruby ball must be clean. Over time a surface coating can build up on the ruby
ball which prevents a good seal leading to reduced and variable flow rates. The check
valve can either be cleaned or replaced.
Temperature: Most separations are temperature dependent. Some are simply faster and
more reproducible at elevated temperatures, but for some the peak resolution is
temperature specific. So if the retention times change, check that the column heater is set
to the correct temperature.
Problems Storing HPLC Water?
The use of water in HPLC mobile phases can be a source of many problems. In this blog post we look
at the effects of storage and how to prevent storage related problems.
When you make up fresh mobile phase you probably assign an expiry date based on the fact that you
know the solvent mixture will be subject to change over time but what you may not consider is the
storage of the solvents prior to mobile phase preparation.
In the case of water, this can have significant detrimental effects on your chromatography. The
primary reason is that water is a great solvent. It can absorb contaminants via leaching from the
container in which it is stored, and it can also absorb contaminants, such as airborne bacteria, from
exposure to the atmosphere. These contaminants are likely to increase the total organic carbon
(TOC) in the water which in turn can lead to chromatographic problems such as: noisy and drifting
baselines; extra (unexpected) peaks, often referred to as 'ghost' peaks, and in extreme cases problems
with retention times and peak shapes.
The extent and impact of these effects will depend on the nature of the HPLC method that you are
using. For some methods you may not see any detrimental effects and for others it can be absolutely
critical. Contaminants are much more likely to show up, and thus create problems, if you are using
UV detection at low wavelengths, in the area of ~ 210nm, or sensitive mass spectrometry. In these
cases it would be worth investigating the effects of water storage and source (e.g., lab purification
system vs. bought in bottled water) as part of robustness in method development so that the problem
and issues are understood fully before the method is in routine use.
To prevent these problems (or reduce them as much as possible) the following is advised:
Question:
I assess assay results for imported pharmaceutical products performed by a third party lab. The
methods we use do not always specify an "allowed" retention time range. What would a reasonable
guide be when assessing this plus or minus 10%? Basically, what I should like to know is when
should we ask the laboratory to investigate/explain a retention time shift from one assay to the next?
Put another way, when should the laboratory make system adjustments like the temperature of the
column, flow rate etc. in order for the retention time to conform? Often the method will say the
active elutes at say 10 minutes. Does this mean that 9 to 11 minutes is also OK, or are there justifiable
limits that we can impose?
Answer:
The reasons for variation of retention time from analysis to analysis includes small differences in
the following: the composition of the mobile phase (in terms of the aqueous and organic solvent
portions); the pH of the mobile phase (particularly important for ionisable molecules like acids and
bases); HPLC columns (column to column variation), and HPLC systems (particularly the system
volume). As a result of these variables it is expected that the retention time will vary and usually
small variations do not cause any problems. The potential problems associated with retention time
variation from run to run (not injection to injection in the same run, that is a more serious problem
which may indicate a problem) includes:
The change in runtime means that a peak is not fully collected by the end of the run and thus
the analysis has to be repeated.
For analysis of mixtures, such as impurity analysis, peaks may be difficult to assign if the
retention time varies.
Automatic integration events may have problems relating to identifying peaks correctly, thus
requiring extra time for reprocessing.
To answer your question, it is difficult to set an allowable retention time range without a good
understanding of the individual method. Ideally the person who develops the method should
investigate its robustness and thus gain information on the range of retention times which might be
expected due to normal variation and where the method still performs as required. Of course, it is
not an ideal world and often you will be presented with data from methods where this has not been
done, or if it has, it is not written into the method. From experience I would say that about 10 to 20%
of the time quoted in the method is a reasonable guide but be careful not to apply it too restrictively.
If you have an analysis where the retention time is on the limits, the best way to assess if there is a
problem is to look at the chromatograms for the analysis and compare to a previous satisfactory
analysis (preferably an example chromatogram should be included in the method). If there arent any
differences except for retention time, and the system suitability testing is all fine, then the results
should be satisfactory to use. If the retention time is very different to that expected and well outside
of this approximate range then I would suspect that something has been changed in the way the
method was applied and would want the analyst to investigate further.
Although pharmacopoeia sometimes include adjustments to temperature, flow rate etc. to make sure
that a peak is at a particular retention time these changes are actually deviations to the method and
unless you are following a pharmacopoeia method or have validated your method to show that these
alterations are valid then it is not a good idea to change the method parameters.
Im sure we have all experienced it that sinking feeling when you realize your analyte retention times have drifted
outside the software window and you have a pile of chromatograms with no quantitative results. Or you are trying to
get that system suitability result to begin your batch of analyses as you really need to get out of the door fast but your
retention times just wont settle down. Or you are trying to reproduce Bob from the R&D centers method and his
retention times (or chromatogram..!) look nothing like yours. Or you are trying to validate your method and the three
column lots you are trying give different retention behavior to the column that you just developed your method on. Or
every time you do an injection the retention time of the analyte changes just a little doesnt cause anything to fall
over, but you just dont understand why.
Yes there are a whole bunch of retention time issues that cause problems in HPLC. A lot of the underlying causes
we can do something about others we just need to be aware of the cause and put our minds to rest. The remainder
of this technical tip will outline how to overcome, or better control, all of the situations outlined above.
Overarching rules on retention time variability:
If the void (hold-up) time (t0) and analyte retention time (tR) vary together, suspect a flow rate change. In this
scenario the analyte capacity factor (k) will remain constant
If only the analyte retention time varies, with the void (hold-up) time remaining constant, then k will also
change. In this scenario suspect a change in the selectivity or retentivity of the separation system
This is typically due to a change in mobile phase composition, which can be caused when pre-mixed mobile phases
lose some of the organic solvent through evaporation as the run progresses. Ever noticed this seems to happen
more towards the end of a run? Well of course the organic solvent is being continually lost to the atmosphere or as
the eluent in the sealed bottle depletes there is more headspace for the more volatile component to evaporate into -
and of course a small amount of evaporation makes a bigger overall composition change in the ever diminishing
volume of liquid. This is typically why we see elution times becoming longer rather than shorter. What to do? Mix
eluents (even isocratic ones) online or at the very least ensure the reservoir you are using is capped. We may also
experience a change in the pH of the aqueous component of the eluent over time which is caused by ingress of CO 2;
lowering the eluent pH and changing the retention and perhaps even the selectivity of the separation.so again, cap
your bottle. Do not use lab film to cover eluent reservoirs especially when using MS detection (watch out for ions at
142 Da as you leach the plasticizer from the film!)
Another related note on eluents here if we de-gas pre-mixed mobile phases using vacuum, the very act of sucking
the mobile phase through the filter under vacuum can cause loss of the more volatile component which will lead to
irreproducible changes in eluent composition from batch to batch of eluent. The same is also true when degassing
pre-mixed phases using ultrasonic baths; the warming of the eluent in the sonic bath can lead to loss of the organic
modifier and, hence, change retention characteristics.
Temperature is another variable that can alter retention time, changing not only the viscosity of the eluent but the
kinetics of the retention mechanism. Ionizable compounds tend to be affected by temperature more than non-
ionogenic compounds; therefore, selectivity may also change. Most systems come with column heaters / chillers
these days, but if yours doesnt, and you get large temperature variations in the lab, this can cause retention time
variability (especially when the system is placed directly below your air-con). Even systems which do have column
heaters work in different ways some pre-warm the eluent prior to entry into the column for example and these
systems may well give different retention times to those which heat the column only.
In this category we must also consider the more esoteric issue of the sample diluent. For reasons that are too
detailed to enter into here, the eluotropic strength and ionic strength of the sample diluent can sometimes have a big
effect on analyte retention time and peak shape yes thats the sample diluent, the thing you dissolve the sample in
not the HPLC eluent. You should always strive to match the aqueous / organic ratio of the eluent (at the start of the
gradient if doing gradient elution) as well as the buffer strength of the eluent. If the diluent is more highly organic than
the eluent (for solubility reasons) try to restrict your injection volume to 10 L or less.
For more information see this article:
3.1.2: Theory/Principle:
3.1.3: Mobile Phase:
Most commonly used mobile phase for HPLC analysis are petroleum ether, cyclohexane,
toluene, benzene, esters, chloroform, ethyl ether, methyl ethyl ketone, alcohols, water,
organic acids. These mobile phases along with their polarity and retention time are shown in
table below:[2]
High polarity
Fluoroalkanes
Petroleum ether
Carbon tetrachloride
Cyclohexane
Toluene
Benzene
Esters
Chloroform
Ethyl ether
Dichloromethane
Alcohols
Water
Organic acids
Normally, the mobile phase consist of mixture of polar and non- polar solvents such as
water and ethanol.[3]
In gradient elution HPLC, the polarity of the mobile phase is continuously changed by
changing the ratio of the solvents in the mobile phase. It is most useful way to control the
retention volume or retention time of the sample component.[2]
Mobile phase must be chosen that would not interfere with the measurements by the
detector. For example, in case of ultraviolet absorption detector, the solvent cannot absorb
ultraviolet radiations. Mixture of methanol, ethanol and propanol with heptanes and
chloroform with heptanes are popular choices as HPLC mobile phases. Mixture of methanol
with water is used in reverse phase HPLC as mobile phase.[2]
Some of the stationary phases used in HPLC are listed in table below: [2]
Low polarity
Alumina
Magnesium oxide
Charcoal
Silica gel
Calcium oxide
Magnesium carbonate
Potassium carbonate
Sodium carbonate
Starch
cellulose
High adsorption
Least adsorption
Mostly used solid adsorbent is silica gel. The SiOH groups on silica gel make the gel weakly
acidic and attract basic compounds. Generally silica gel attracts bases in order of their
strength; i.e; strong bases are retained on silica gel columns longer than weak bases. Silica
gel is used as packing material in the form of pure particles and as a pellicle on the solid
support. A pellicle is a thin layer of coating on a surface. The pellicles used in HPLC are
chemically bonded to the surface of the support material. HPLC pellicular materials are
larger and more easily packed into the column than the micro particulate pure adsorbents
and the resulting columns are more efficient.[2]
Alumina is another solid adsorbent which is widely used in column packing material.
Alumina is basic, it retains acidic compounds. Alumina is mostly used in pellicular form.[2]
3.1.5: Instrumentation:
The basic components of HPLC are:
Columns
Detectors
Recording system
i: Analytical column:
Analytical columns used in HPLC are constructed from stainless steel material. There
length ranging from 30 mm to 300 mm and diameter between 2.1 mm to 4.6 mm. porous
silica particles are used to pack the column with the thickness of 3 - 10 m. The
efficiencies of these columns are 40,000 - 60,000 theoretical plates/m.[4]
Solutes binding to the stationary phase irreversibly which degrade the column efficiency by
decreasing the available stationary phase
With the sample, particulate material is injected which clog the analytical column
Before the analytical column, guard column is placed to overcome these problems.
Guard columns are less expensive; however, these are packed with the same packing
material and stationary phase as analytical column. Guard columns are replaced regularly
because they are intended to be sacrificial.
d: Detectors:
The detectors used in HPLC must have low dead volume to minimize extra column band
broadening. The detector should be small and suitable with liquid flow. The detector used in
HPLC depend on the nature of the sample.[4] [6]
Spectroscopic detector
Fluorescence detector
The sensitivity of ultraviolet - visible (UV) detector is about 10-8 g/ml (0.01 ppm). UV
detectors are not temperature sensitive. They are less expensive and can be used with
gradient elution.[7]
The most of the UV detectors have a simple interference filter which measures the
absorbance at few selected wavelengths. The expensive UV detectors have
monochromators that allows absorbance at particular wavelength.[6]
e: Recording system:
D:\hplc pik
3.1.6: Applications:
Purity of Samples:
Purity of samples can be determined by high performance liquid chromatography.[9]
Analysis of drugs:
HPLC is used for the analysis of drugs in biological fluids[9].
CHAPTER # 3
3.2: Gas Chromatography and Mass
Spectrometry: (GC-MS)
Introduction:
In gas chromatography and mass spectrometric technique (GC-MS) the components of
mixture are separated by the GC and these components are identified at molecular level by
MS.[7]
3.2.1: Principle:
In gas chromatography, when sample mixture is heated it separates into individual
components and converted into vapour states. These vapours are moved through column
along with carrier gas such as helium. The separated components emerge from the column
and enter into the ionization chamber of mass spectrometer.[7]
In mass spectrometer, molecules are ionized by using beam of highly energetic electrons.
The ionization of molecules depends upon the nature of the bonds in the molecules. The
molecular ions are broken up into many fragments. There are particular mass to charge
value for every ion. In most cases, ions have only one charge so that m/e value is the
molecular mass of the ion.[10] [11]
The most commonly used stationary phases are squalane, polydimethyl siloxane, 50%
methyl - 50 % phenyl polysiloxane, 50% cyanopropyl - 50% phenyl methyl polysiloxane,
polyethylene glycol.[4]
3.2.4: Instrumentation:
The instrument used for GC - MS consists of following basic components:
Gas chromatograph:
Inlet system
Oven
Column
Mass spectrometer
d: Ion source
f: Detector
Oven:
In order to control the column temperature, column is placed inside the thermostated
over.[4]
Isothermal analysis.
Temperature programming.
i: Isothermal analysis:
Isothermal analysis is used when constant temperature throughout the analysis is required
i.e. there is 100C or less difference in the boiling point of low and high boiling
components.[8]
Column:
The gas chromatographic columns are of many types such as U - shaped columns and
coiled tube columns.[7]
Capillary columns
i: Packed columns:
Packed columns are made of stainless steel, glass, aluminium or copper. The length of
packed column is 2 - 6 meters. Internal diameter is 2 - 4 mm.[4] The stationary phase is
packed in a column.[3] the solid support used in GC columns is diatomaceous earth. It
consist of hydrated silica gel.[4]
Ionization:
The molecules form GC column enter into ion source of MS and these sample molecules
are ionized. Ionization potential is the minimum energy required to ionize the sample
molecules.[10]
Electron Ionization
Chemical Ionization
i: Electron Ionization:
Electron ionization is the most common ionization technique used in MS. Molecules after
entering into MS bombarded with highly energetic electrons emitted from the hot filament.
After bombardment, fragments of molecules are produced. A very low pressure is required
for electron ionization process.[6] [8]
e: Mass Analyzer:
The ions from the ionization chamber enter into mass analyzer. The function of mass
analyzers is to resolve the different mass fragments.[6] [10]
The quadruple mass analyzer consists of four metal electrodes. Each electrode is
connected to its opposite electrode electrically. These electrodes are 10 - 15 cm long and 5
- 6 mm in diameter. When these electrodes are polarized, ions of particular mass to charge
ratio are allowed to pass through the space between electrodes.[14]