NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.

Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information

Designation: D 427 98

Standard Test Method for

Shrinkage Factors of Soils by the Mercury Method1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 427; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.

1. Scope Particle-Size Analysis and Analysis and Determination of

1.1 This test method provides a procedure for obtaining the
data which are used to calculate the shrinkage limit and the
shrinkage ratio.
1.2 This test method uses mercury which is a hazardous
substance. Test Method D 4943 does not use mercury and is an
acceptable alternate to this procedure.
1.3 The liquid limit, plastic limit, and shrinkage limit are
often collectively referred to as the Atterberg Limits in recog-
nition of their formation by Swedish soil scientist, A. Atter-
berg. These water contents distinguish the boundaries of the
several consistency states of cohesive soils.
1.4 This test method is performed only on that portion of a
soil which passes the 425-m (No. 40) sieve. The relative
contribution of this portion of the soil must be considered when
using this test method to evaluate the properties of the soil as
a whole.
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
standard. The values stated in inch-pound units are approxi-
mate and given for guidance only. Reporting of test results in
units other than SI shall not be regarded as nonconformance
with this standard.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. This test method
involves the use of the hazardous material mercury, see Section
7.
NOTE 1Warning: Mercury is a definite health hazard in use and
disposal.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
C 670 Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements
for Test Methods for Construction Materials2
D 421 Practice for Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D-18 on Soil
and Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.03 on Texture,
Plasticity, and Density Characteristics of Soils.
Current edition approved Dec. 10, 1998. Published March 1999. Originally
published as D 427 35. Last previous edition D 427 93 (1998).
2 4
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.02.
Soil Constants3
D 653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained
Fluids3
D 2216 Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water
(Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock3
D 2488 Practice for Description and Identification of Soils
(Visual-Manual Procedure)3
D 3740 Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies
Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock
as Used in Engineering Design and Construction3
D 4318 Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and
Plasticity Index of Soils3
D 4753 Specification for Evaluating, Selecting, and Speci-
fying Balances and Scales for Use in Testing Soil, Rock,
and Related Construction Materials3
D 4943 Test Method for Shrinkage Factors of Soils by the
Wax Method4
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 The definitions used in this test method shall be in
accordance with Terminology D 653.
3.1.2 dry strengtha descriptive measure of the effort
required to crush an air-dried 12-mm (12-in.) diameter ball of
soil in accordance with Practice D 2488.
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 A sample of fine-grained soil is thoroughly remolded
with water to approximate the liquid limit consistency. The
saturated paste is placed into a container of known volume and
slowly dried. The final mass and volume of the solid soil pat
are determined. These measurements are used to compute the
soil constants.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 The shrinkage factors covered in this test method can
only be determined on basically fine-grained (cohesive) soils
which exhibit a dry strength when air dried.
5.2 The term shrinkage limit, expressed as a water content
in percent, is typically assumed to represent the amount of
3
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.08.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.09.

Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

1
 D 427
water required to fill the voids of a given cohesive soil at its
minimum void ratio obtained by drying (usually oven). Thus,
the concept shrinkage limit can be used to evaluate the
shrinkage potential or possibility of development, or both, of
cracks in earthworks involving cohesive soils.
5.3 Data obtained from this test method may be used to
compute the volumetric shrinkage and linear shrinkage.
NOTE 2Notwithstanding the statements on precision and bias con-
tained in this test method, the precision of this test method is dependent on
the competence of the personnel performing it and the suitability of the
equipment and facilities used. Agencies which meet the criteria of Practice
D 3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective
testing. Users of this test method are cautioned that compliance with
Practice D 3740 does not in itself ensure reliable testing. Reliable testing
depends on several factors; Practice D 3740 provides a means of evalu-
ating some of those factors.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Evaporating Dish, porcelain, about 140 mm (512 in.) in
diameter.
6.2 Spatula, or pill knife having a blade about 76 mm (3 in.)
in length and about 19.0 mm (34 in.) in width.
6.3 Shrinkage DishA circular porcelain or monel metal
milk dish having a flat bottom and being about 44 mm (134 in.)
in diameter and about 12 mm (12 in.) in height.
6.4 Straightedge, steel, about 150 mm (6 in.) in length.
6.5 Glass Cup, about 57 mm (214) in.) in diameter and
about 31 mm (114 in.) in height, the top rim of which is ground
smooth and is in a plane essentially parallel with the bottom of
the cup.
6.6 Glass Plate, with three metal prongs for immersing the
soil pat in mercury, as shown in Fig. 1.
6.7 Glass Plate, a plane glass plate large enough to cover
the glass cup.
6.8 Graduate, glass, having a capacity of 25 mL and
graduated to 0.2 mL.
6.9 Balance, sensitive to 0.1 g and conforming to the
requirements of Class GP2 balances in Specification D 4753.
Metric Equivalents
in.
1 32
1 16
18
mm 0.8 1.6 3.2
FIG. 1 Apparatus for Determining the Volumetric Change of Subgrade Soils
2
6.10 Mercury, sufficient to fill the glass cup to overflowing.
6.11 Shallow Pan, about 20 by 20 by 5-cm (8 by 8 by 2-in.)
deep nonmetallic (preferably glass) pan used to contain acci-
dental mercury spills.
7. Hazards
7.1 WarningMercury is a hazardous substance that can
cause illness and death. Inhalation of mercury vapor is a
serious health hazard. Mercury can also be absorbed through
the skin. The effects of mercury are cumulative.
7.2 PrecautionIn addition to other precautions, store
mercury in sealed shatter-proof containers to control evapora-
tion, work in a well-ventilated area (preferably under a fume
hood), and avoid contact with skin. Rubber gloves should be
worn at all times.
7.3 Minimize uncontrolled spills by performing those parts
of the procedure (9.3 and 9.6) in a large shallow pan which can
act as a catchment.
7.4 Clean up spills immediately using a recommended
procedure explicitly for mercury.
7.5 Dispose of contaminated waste materials including the
dry soil pat in a safe and environmentally acceptable manner.
8. Sampling
8.1 Select about 30 g of soil from the thoroughly mixed
portion of the material passing the No. 40 (425-m) sieve
which has been obtained in accordance with Practice D 421.
9. Procedure
9.1 Place the soil in the evaporating dish and thoroughly
mix with distilled water. The amount of water added should
produce a soil of the consistency somewhat above the liquid
limit (Test Method D 4318) based on visual inspection. In
physical terms, this is a consistency that is not a slurry but one
that will flow sufficiently to expel air bubbles when using
gentle tapping action. It is desirable to use the minimum
732 716 1516 3
5.6 11.1 23.8 76.2
 D 427
possible water content. This is of some importance with very
plastic soils so that they do not crack during the drying process.
9.2 Coat the inside of the shrinkage dish with a thin layer of
petroleum jelly, silicone grease, or similar lubricant to prevent
the adhesion of the soil to the dish. Determine and record the
mass in grams (pounds/mass) of the empty dish, MT.
9.3 Place the shrinkage dish in the shallow pan in order to
catch any mercury overflow. Fill the shrinkage dish to over-
flowing with mercury. Remove the excess mercury by pressing
the glass plate firmly over the top of the shrinkage dish.
Observe that there is no air trapped between the plate and
mercury and if there is, refill the dish and repeat the process.
Determine the volume of mercury held in the shrinkage dish
either by means of the glass graduate or by dividing the
measured mass of mercury by the mass density of mercury
(equal to 13.55 Mg/m3). Record this volume in cubic centime-
tres (cubic feet) of the wet soil pat, V.
NOTE 3Caution: Mercury is a hazardous substance which can cause
serious health effects from prolonged inhalation of the vapor or contact
with the skin, see Section 7.
NOTE 4It is not necessary to measure the volume of the shrinkage
dish (wet soil pat) during each test. The value of a previous measurement
may be used provided that it was obtained as specified in 9.3 and the
shrinkage dish is properly identified and in good physical condition.
9.4 Place an amount of the wetted soil equal to about one
third the volume of the dish in the center of the dish, and cause
the soil to flow to the edges by taping the dish on a firm surface
cushioned by several layers of blotting paper or similar
material. Add an amount of soil approximately equal to the first
portion, and tap the dish until the soil is thoroughly compacted
and all included air has been brought to the surface. Add more
soil and continue the tapping until the dish is completely filled
and excess soil stands out above its edge. Strike off the excess
soil with a straightedge, and wipe off all soil adhering to the
outside of the dish. Immediately after it is filled and struck off,
determine and record the mass in grams (pounds/mass) of the
dish and wet soil, Mw.
9.5 Allow the soil pat to dry in air until the color of the soil
turns from dark to light. Oven-dry the soil pat to constant mass
at 110 6 5C (230 6 9F). If the soil pat is cracked or has
broken in pieces, return to 9.1 and prepare another soil pat
using a lower water content. Determine and record the mass in
g (lbm) of the dish and dry soil, MD.
9.6 Determine the volume of the dry soil pat by removing
the pat from the shrinkage dish and immersing it in the glass
cup full of mercury in the following manner.
9.6.1 Place the glass cup in the shallow pan in order to catch
any mercury overflow. Fill the glass cup to overflowing with
mercury. Remove the excess mercury by pressing the glass
plate with the three prongs (Fig. 1) firmly over the top of the
cup. Observe that there is no air trapped between the plate and
mercury and if there is, refill the dish and repeat the process.
Carefully wipe off any mercury that may be adhering to the
outside of the cup.
9.6.2 Place the evaporating dish in the shallow pan in order
to catch any mercury overflow. Place the cup filled with
mercury in the evaporating dish and rest the soil pat on the
surface of the mercury (it will float). Using the glass plate with
3
the three prongs gently press the pat under the mercury and
press the plate firmly over the top of the cup to expel any
excess mercury. Observe that there is no air trapped between
the plate and mercury, and, if there is, repeat the process
starting from 9.6.1. Measure the volume of the mercury
displaced into the evaporating dish either by means of the glass
graduate or by dividing the measured mass of mercury by the
mass density of mercury. Record the volume in cubic centime-
tres (cubic feet) of the dry soil pat, Vo.
10. Calculation
10.1 Calculate the initial wet soil mass as:
M 5 Mw 2 M T (1)
10.2 Calculate the dry soil mass as:
Mo 5 M D 2 M T (2)
10.3 Calculate the initial water content of the soil as a
percentage of the dry mass as:
w 5 @~M 2 M o!/Mo# 3 100 (3)
10.4 Calculate the shrinkage limit as a water content of the
soil as a percentage of the dry mass as:
SL 5 w 2 $@~V 2 V o!rw/Mo# 3 100% (4)
where:
rw 5 approximate density of water equal to 1.0 g/cm3(62.4
lb/ft 3)
V, Voare defined in the procedures section.
10.5 Calculate the shrinkage ratio, R from the data obtained
in the volumetric shrinkage determination by the following
equation:
R 5 M o/~Vo 3 rw! (5)
11. Report
11.1 Report the following information:
11.1.1 Identification data and visual description of sample.
11.1.2 Value of initial water content to the nearest whole
number and omitting the percentage designation.
11.1.3 Value of shrinkage limit to the nearest whole number
and omitting the percentage designation.
11.1.4 Value of shrinkage ratio to the nearest 0.01.
12. Precision and Bias
12.1 BiasThere is no acceptable reference value for this
test method, therefore, bias cannot be determined.
12.2 Precision5Table 1 presents estimates of precision
based on results from the AASHTO Materials Reference
Laboratory (AMRL) Proficiency Sample Program of testing
conducted on Samples 103 and 104. These samples were found
to be a CL material having 59.4 % fines, a liquid limit of 33 and
a plastic limit of 18.
12.2.1 The column labeled Acceptable Range of Two
Results quantifies the maximum difference expected between
two measurements on samples of the same material under the
5
Research Report RR:D18-1002 contains the data used to establish this precision
statement and is available from ASTM Headquarters.
 D 427
TABLE 1 Table of Precision Estimates conditions listed in the first column. These values only apply to
Material and Average Standard
Acceptable soils which are similar to Proficiency Samples 103 and 104.
Range of Two
Type Index Value DeviationA
ResultsA NOTE 5The figures given in Column 3 are the standard deviations that
Single-Operator: have been found to be appropriate for the test results described in Column
Shrinkage limit 16 0.6 1.8 1. The figures given in Column 4 are the limits that should not be exceeded
Shrinkage 1.90 0.04 0.13 by the difference between two properly conducted tests.
ratio
Multilaboratory: NOTE 6Criteria for assigning standard deviation values for highly
Shrinkage limit 16 1.7 4.8 plastic or noncohesive soils are not available at the present time.
Shrinkage 1.90 0.07 0.19
ratio 13. Keywords
A
These numbers represent, respectively, the (1s) and (d2s) limits as described
in Practice C 670. 13.1 Atterberg limits; cohesive soils; dry strength; linear
shrinkage; mercury; shrinkage ratio; volumetric shrinkage

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Committee D-18 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue (D 427
93 (1998)) that may impact the use of this test method.

1. Added Note 2 referencing Practice D 3740. Subsequently 2. In 9.3, changed ... mg/m3 to Mg/m3.
renumbered notes affected by adding Note 2. 3. Moved location of Table 1 to be follow 12.2.1.

The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.