Standing upon the Land

John Joseph, Randy Lee, and Richard Anthony

For those that have never been able to possess a piece of land due
to the restraints of the natural man's commercial world order, and
have been led thereby to believe that the Lord does not provide for
His children at all times, we offer the following revelations to those
children who are in the world but not of it, and therefore will not be
seeking to make merchandise of our loving Father's Creation and
Providence.

The alternative to purchasing a "title" or "deed" to land and paying a

yearly rent to Caesar (taxes) because of the commercial status
thereof, is to "stand upon the land." The more specific phrase to
use is "standing upon land that's sitting in waste," and your purpose
is to be a caretaker of it and to cultivate it, as mandated in Holy
Scripture. If you are moved by the Holy Spirit to proceed in this
manner, it is extremely important that you make it clear to others
that you are not standing upon the land to acquire title, deed, or
ownership to itfor the land belongs to God, and He commanded
that it not be sold forever:

Leviticus 25:23, "The land shall not be sold for

ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and
sojourners with me."

Leviticus 25:34, "But the field of the suburbs of their

cities may not be sold; for it is their perpetual
possession."

Psalms 24:1, "The earth is the LORD'S, and the

fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell
therein."

1 Corinthians 10:26,28 "For the earth is the Lord's,

and the fulness thereof."

In order to find a piece of land upon which you can stand, the first
step is to go to the County Tax Assessor's Office or Recorder of
Deeds, i.e., where land records are kept within each county
(sometimes located at the courthouse). Therein, locate the
alphabetical list of land owners. Do a search for "Unknown owner,"
"Unclaimed land," or other similar words. This will list pieces of land
that have never been registered with the county, i.e., they have
never entered commerce. Each piece of land will have a
corresponding ten digit "Assessor's ID Number." Use this Assessor
ID Number to get the section number of the Plat Map that this land
is located on. The section number will look similar to the following
"POR. SEC.14 T.4.N. R.17W." Once you look at this Plat Map (also
called a "Licensed Surveyor's Map," or a "Parcel Map"), then you
will know the location of this land within the county. There will be
names of roads and possibly an address, etc.

Once you find the location of the parcels of unclaimed land, the
next step is to physically go to each location and see if it is being
used. If there are any signs of it being currently possessed
(enclosures, structures, or cultivation), you cannot stand on that
land. If, however, this land appears to have never been used, or it
appears that it was once used (by having old enclosures and
structures on it) but is now abandoned, you may proceed to Stand
upon the Land.

Maxims of Law dealing with Possession and Land

What belongs to no one, naturally belong to the

first occupant.
Possession is a good title, where no better title
appears.
Long possession produces the right of
possession, and takes away from the true
owner his action.
Possessor has right against all men but him
who has the very right.
When a man has the possession as well as the
right of property, he is said to have jus
duplicatum - a double right, forming a complete
title.
A person in possession is not bound to prove
that the possessions belong to him.
Rights of dominion are transferred without title
or delivery, by prescription, to wit, long and
quiet possession.
Enjoy your own property in such a manner as
not to injure that of another person.
He who owns the soil, owns up to the sky.
 The owner of a piece of land owns everything
above and below it to an indefinite extent.
Of whom is the land, of him is it also to the sky
and to the deepest depths; he who owns the
land owns all above and all below the surface.
Every man's house is his castle.
A man cannot be taken by force from his house
to be conducted before a judge or to prison.
The habitation of each one is an inviolable
asylum for him.
Whatever is affixed to the soil belongs to it.
With the land goes whatever is on the land
planted.
What is built upon the land, goes with the land:
a building follows the ownership of the land.
Rivers and ports are public, therefore the right
of fishing there is common to all.
Land comprehends any ground soil, or earth
whatsoever; as meadows, pastures, woods,
moors, waters, and marshes.

Pedis possessio: Possession of the foot: an actual foothold; actual

possession of land.
Since standing upon land is a natural symbol of possessing it, the
phrase has come to mean actual possession of any particular piece
of land, as evidenced by occupation, inclosure, etc. Pedis positio:
Placing of the foot; a foothold. A Dictionary of Law, by William C.
Anderson (1893), page 789.

Potior est conditio possidentis: The stronger is the condition of

the party in possession. A Dictionary of Law, by William C.
Anderson (1893), page 790.

Possessor: He who holds, detains, or enjoys a thing as his own.

A bona fide possessor of land is one who not only supposes himself
to be the true proprietor, but who is ignorant that his title is
contested by another person claiming a better right to the land. 2
Bl. Com. 198, 190.

Court Decisions and Definitions

Actual possession: Exists when a thing is in ones immediate

occupancy. Constructive possession: Possession in
contemplation of the law. Brown v. volkening, 64 N.Y. 80 (1876),
Allen J.; Lillianskyoldt v. Goss, 2 Utah, 297 (1878).

Actual possession, which means a subjection to the will and

dominion of the claimant, is usually evidenced by occupation, by a
substantial enclosure, by cultivation, or by appropriate use,
according to the particular locality and quality of the property.
Coryell v. Cain, 16 Cal. 573 (1860), Field, C.J. See also 71 Ala.265;
1 Cal.263; 16 id. 109; 4 Nev. 68; 59 N.Y. 136.

Constructive possession, where there is no actual possession, is

in him who has the legal and rightful title. Norris's Appeal, 64 Pa.
282 (1870).

Naked possession: Actual occupation of an estate, without

apparent right, or shadow or pretense of right, to hold or continue
such possession. Called also bare possession. Gillett v. Gaffney, 3
Col. 360 (1877).

Thus, where one man invades the possession of another, and by

force or surprise turns him out of his occupation, till some act be
done by the rightful owner to divest this possession is prima facie
evidence of a legal title, which, by length of time, may ripen into an
indefeasible title. A man out of possession has remaining the right
of possession, which is an apparent right of possession, defensible
by proof of a better right, and an actual right of possession, which
will stand the test against all opponents. 2 Bl. Com. 195-96; 8 id.
177, 179.

Statutory Terms

To establish your dominion through possession, you will need to

avoid using all the terms hereafter. For example, "Adverse
Possession" is a statutory term, just as "squatter" is a statutory
term. Do not use these terms or answer to them:

Owner or Ownership.
Settler or settle.
Squatter or Squatters Rights.
Adverse Possession or Preemption.
Custody or Custodian.
Personal Property
Estate, Realty or Real Estate

These are not the same as "standing upon the land." The "rights of
squatters" are greater than those who hold a legal title, but
"standing upon land" is greater than the rights of squatters and
adverse possessions. Adverse possession (or pre-emption) is a
method of gaining legal title to land by openly occupying the land
continuously for a number of years (as set by State law) while
claiming "ownership" of the land. "Standing upon the land" has
nothing to do with a legal title to and personal ownership of an
"estate" or "realty," which are commercial in nature.

Adverse possession: Possession of realty avowedly opposed to

some claim of title in another. A Dictionary of Law, by William C.
Anderson (1893), page 790.

A possession not under the legal proprietor [owner], but entered

into without his consent, directly or indirectly given; a possession by
which he is disseised [unlawful dispossession from real property]
and ousted. French v. Pierce, 8 Conn. 442-46 (1831), Hosmer,
Chief Justice.

An adverse and hostile possession is one held for the possessor,

as distinguished from one held in subordination to the right of
another; a possession inconsistent with the possession or right of
possession by another. Such is an exclusive possession of one
who is not in privity with the true owner. "Visible" and "notorious"
are terms employed to denote that the possession must be more
than secret, and unknown to the disseised owner. Since
acquiescence implies knowledge, a possession that he permits
must be "notorious" or known to him. Sheaffer v. Eakman, 56 Pa.
153 (1867), Strong J.; Ewing v. Burnet, 11 Pet. 53 (1837).

If under claim of right, and uninterrupted, open, visible, and

notorious for twenty years, such possession is evidence of title in
the possessor, and a good defense in ejectment. Hogan v. Kurtz,
94 U.S. 776 (1876), cases.

Independently of positive statute law, such a possession affords a

presumption that all the claimants to the land acquiesce in the claim
of the possessor, or that they forbear for some substantial reason to
controvert his claim or to disturb him in his quiet enjoyment. Secret
possession will not do, as publicity and notoriety are necessary as
evidence of notice and to put adverse claimants upon inquiry. Mere
occupation is not sufficient, but adverse and continuous possession
is. Armstrong v. Morrill, 14 Wall. 145-46 (1871), cases, Clifford J.;
Hughes v. United States, 4 id. 232 (1866).

The weight of authority is that, where one has had the peaceable,
undisturbed, open possession of real or personal property, with an
assertion of his ownership, for the period which, under the law,
would bar an action for its recovery by the real owner, the former
has acquired a good title - a title superior to that of the latter, whose
neglect to avail himself of his legal rights has lost him his title.
Campell v. Holy, 115 U.S. 623 (1885), cases, Miller, J.; Gilbert v.
Decker, 53 Conn. 401-5 (1865), cases; Hollingsworth v. Sherman,
81 Va. 671, 674 (1886), cases.

Adverse possession of vacant lands, under color of title, includes

as much as is within the boundaries of the title, and to that extent
the true owner is disseised. But if the latter be in actual possession
of any part, his constructive seizure extends to not all in fact
occupied by the intruder. The reason is, the intruder's acts give
notice only to the extent of actual occupancy. Hunnicutt v. Peyton,
102 U.S. 368-69 (1880), cases, Strong, J.

Prescription: Title by prescription is a right which a possessor of

land acquires by reason of his diverse possession during a period
of time fixed by law, and where it does not originate in fraud, and is
under a claim of right. What the primary owner has lost by his
laches the other party has gained by continued possession, without
question of his right. This is the foundation of the doctrine, which, in
the English law, is mainly applied to incorporeal hereditaments, but
which in the Roman law, and the codes founded on it, is applied to
property of all kinds. A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson
(1893), page 804.

Settler: Within the meaning of pre-emption laws, one who actually

resides upon the land in question. A Dictionary of Law, William C.
Anderson (1893), page 944.

Pre-emptor: He who holds such prior right of purchase. One who

by settlement on the public land or by cultivating a portion of it has
obtained the right to purchase a portion of such land, to the
exclusion of all other persons. A Dictionary of Law, William C.
Anderson (1893), page 800.

Squatter's right: The "right" to ownership of land merely because

you have occupied it for a long time. This is different than adverse
possession and is not recognized as a right in most places. Oran's
Dictionary of the Law.

Squatter: A person who settles or locates on land without obtaining

legal title. n.
1. a person or thing that squats.
2. a person who occupies property without permission, lease, or
payment of rent.
3. a person who settles on land under government regulation, in
order to acquire title.
A Dictionary of Law, William C. Anderson (1893), page 963.

Squatter:
1. One who squats; specifically, one who settles unlawfully upon
land without a title. In the United States and Australia the term is
sometimes applied also to a person who settles lawfully upon
government land under permission and restrictions, before
acquiring title. In such a tract, squatters and trespassers were
tolerated to an extent now unknown. Macaulay.
2. (Zol.) See Squat snipe, under Squat. Squatter sovereignty, the
right claimed by the squatters, or actual residents, of a Territory of
the United States to make their own laws. [Local, U.S.] Bartlett.
Webster Dictionary (1913), Page: 1397.

Squat: v.
1. To sit down upon the hams or heels; as, the savages squatted
near the fire.
2. To sit close to the ground; to cower; to stoop, or lie close, to
escape observation, as a partridge or rabbit.
3. To settle on another's land without title; also, to settle on common
or public lands.
Webster Dictionary (1913), Page: 1397.

Miscellaneous Terms

Support: The right in an owner to rely upon the support afforded

his land by the ground adjoining, in its natural state. Spoken of as
lateral, when the support is thought of as contiguous or adjacent,
rather than as subjacent.

The right to support for land in its natural condition is ex jure

naturae, not dependent on grant and not acquirable by prescription.
The right to support for artificial burdens is an easement acquirable
only by grant, express or implied.

Subject to any express grant, reservation, covenant, or inconsistent

right gained by prescription, it is well established that when the
surface of land belongs to one person and the subjacent earth and
minerals to another, the latter is burdened with a natural servitude
to support the former, and also that the owner of land is entitled to
the performance of a similar servitude of lateral support by adjacent
land; but these easements only extend to the land in its natural and
unencumbered state, and not with the additional weight of buildings
upon it.

Every land-owner has a right to have his land preserved unbroken.

An adjacent owner excavating on his land is subject to the
restriction that he must not remove the earth so near his neighbor's
land that his soil will crumble under its own weight and fall. But this
right to lateral support extends only to soil in its natural condition. It
does not protect whatever is placed upon the soil increasing the
downward and lateral pressure. If it did, it would be in the power of
a lot-owner, by erecting heavy buildings, to greatly abridge the right
of his neighbor to use his lot. A Dictionary of Law, William C.
Anderson (1893), Pages 994-995.

Title: A person may have a title to property although he is not the

absolute owner. If he has the actual or constructive possession, or
the right of possession, he has a title. A Dictionary of Law, William
C. Anderson (1893), Page 1034.

The Government cannot Tax Land, only Patents to Land

The following evidences that the government can only tax the
patent to the land, and not the land itself. This is a message from
the Governor of Minnesota, which would introduce a Bill for the
incorporation of the town of Marmata. The Private Secretary of His
Excellency the Governor appeared and presented a message and
accompanying documents from the Governor. On motion, the
message was read by the Clerk as follows:

Executive Office,
St. Paul, Minn., June 15th, 1858

To the Senate and House of Representatives:

I feel it to be my duty to transmit to you, information

relative to the affairs of the State, and to recommend
such action as, in my judgment, will be most
conducive to the public interests.

Owing to the delay attendant upon the induction into

office of the State Officers elect, the assessment of
property required to be made under the direction
of the Auditor, has not yet been commenced. The
rolls have been printed and are ready for distribution
to the Register of Deeds of the several counties, but
some weeks must elapse before they can be placed
in the hands of the township assessors. I therefore
suggest for your consideration, that the time for the
assessment of property be extended to the 15th of
August.

The late decision of the Supreme Court of the United

States, by which lands owned by individuals for
which the patents have not issued, are declared
free from taxation, has not been received here in an
official form, but there seems to be little doubt that
such a decision has been made. In that case a very
great diminuation will be the result in the
anticipated revenue of the State for taxes the
coming year, as in most of the new, and in some of
the older counties, large tracts of land have been
entered by pre-emption, but no patents have yet
been issued. Therefore, I recommend that a
memorial be passed as soon as practical, by you, to
the President, asking that patents be issued for all
such lands by the General Land Office, with the
utmost possible expedition, so that they may be
included in the assessments for the coming year.

It will probably be found necessary, likewise, to

provide more specifically by statute for separate
assessments upon the improvements made on these
lands, so that in case the patent cannot be issued
at a sufficiently early period to enable the
assessors to place the land itself on the rolls of
the present year, the burden of taxation may be as
nearly equalized throughout the State, as
circumstances will permit. The man who holds the
duplicate of the Land Office is really as much the
owner of his land as his neighbor who has
received his patent, and a mere technicality should
not shield him from sharing equally with that neighbor,
in supporting the government which protects both
alike in the possession of their property. In the
memorial to the President, he might properly be
petitioned to instruct the Commissioner of the General
Land Office to cause to be transmitted to the
Governor, to be filed in the office of the State
Auditor, a list of the patents issued, with a
description of the lands therein contained, in this
State, at the expiration of each three months. If this
could be done, the Auditor would have the means in
his power to afford correct information to the
assessors in the different counties, which they could
not readily obtain in any other manner.

In consequence of the depreciated value of real

estate everywhere caused by the financial
derangements in the country, together with the
exemption from taxation of so much land under
the decision of the Supreme Court referred to, it
would not be safe to base an estimate upon the
taxable property of the State, of more than
$35,000,000 or $40,000,000. Should the next regular
session of the Legislature not take place before the
middle of the year 1859, I trust that by exercise of
strict economy, the expenses of the intervening period
may be met, even upon that reduced basis of
calculation. To effect this, however, it will be
necessary for you to pass a stringent law, to compel
the collecting officers in the different counties to pay
into the State Treasury, within a fixed period in each
year, the amount for which such counties are liable,
for it is evident that the tax system tolerated under
the Territorial Government cannot be permitted to
continue with safety to the State. There is already
due of unpaid taxes from many of the counties
between $25,000 and $30,000, which should also be
collected during the current year. It does not appear
from the books of the late Auditor and Treasurer, that
any money remains in the Treasury, and as the report
of the latter officer lately made to you, shows that
nearly all of the $250,000 has already been
appropriated to meet Territorial and State liabilities,
leaving a small amount only wherewith to meet the
expenses of your session, and other necessary
demands, the appropriations for the support of the
State Government, etc., must necessarily be in
anticipation of the revenue to be derived from
taxation. The Constitution limits the State debt to
$250,000 so that no further issue of Scrip or other
evidences of indebtedness by the State is allowable.

As the law authorizing the loan of $250,000, imposed

upon the Government and Treasurer the duty of
 negotiating it, upon consultation we deemed it most
advantageous to receive bids therefore, in the city of
New York, and measures have been taken to
advertise for proposals there until the first of July next,
in the papers of that and other commercial cities.

I propose to meet the Treasurer in New York on the

25th inst., it being advisable for us to have personal
interviews with leading capitalists before the
expiration of the time specified for receiving
proposals, that we may give such verbal explanations
with regard to the resources of the State, and
particulars connected with the contemplated loan, as
may be required. It is my intention, also, to visit
Washington before my return to urge upon the
President the necessity of causing all the patents
for lands in this State, which have not yet been
prepared, to be issued without delay.

Buying Land

If someone buys land, or a part of someone else's land, one can

just stand on the land. There need not be any "price" recorded for
the so-called "purchase," because "...freely ye have received, freely
give" (Matthew 10:8). And as far as the government is concerned,
the "previous owner" can just inform them that the land is no longer
his.

The government might want to contact you and tell you they want
their yearly "rent" from you for living on "their" land. If you do not
receive free mail delivery, they won't be able to contact you through
mail. So, they may try to call you on the phone. When you answer
the phone, you should say, "Greetings in the name of Christ Jesus.
Do you greet me in the same name?" If they do not understand the
question, you may say, "God's Law is the Law I am using, so you
must find your answers in there." And if they say they are calling in
the name of another besides Christ (i.e. Caesar), you can tell them,
"Well, the only purpose for which the Lord brought us together is for
us to speak the truth to one another. Therefore, that is what I will
discuss, for I am to obey God rather than man."

So, they may try to contact you by coming to your land "in person."
Remember, they do not tax the land, they only tax the commercial
"title" to the land. If they show you a piece of paper that claims
jurisdiction for them, you can tell them, "That piece of paper does
not represent or attach to this land." Then point out all the
abbreviations on that paper, and show them how it is only an
"image," a creation of man.

Posting a Close over the Land, not a No Trespassing Sign

In reading the notice at the bottom of this article, you might think it
says the same thing your commercial "NO TRESPASSING" sign
says, and this is just so difficult to understand. I am here to tell you
there is a universe of difference between the twoa great chasm
separating them if you will. Chaff is not wheat, and wheat is not
chaff.

We are to enter into that Righteous Relationship with God, through

our Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus, by the Grace God gives to men
called for His righteous Purposes. It is this relationship which is
evidenced to the world by the outward acts (James 2:14-26).

"Outward acts indicate inward intent." Bouvier's Law

Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2124.

"Acts indicate the intention." Bouvier's Law Dictionary

(1914), "Maxim," p. 2124.

The Intent of a bondservant of Christ is twofold: One, to walk

meekly before God our Father doing all things for His Glory and
Majesty to the end of revealing to the world Him and the Superiority
of His Ways as you walk in them; and, Two, to Lawfully execute the
Duties and Powers appertaining to the Noble and Sacred Office of
the Christ, for the Glory of His only Begotten Son.

God, through His Son, bestows conditional Authority, Powers,

Privileges and Immunities to those called by Him. The conditional
nature is that those who are called must answer that call by
ministering for Him, not for themselves. Let us make no mistake
about thisno one has any inherent Lawful "right" to adoption by
God. Thus, it is not a matter of "self-will" or "personal choice." It is
solely a matter of the Grace of Him Who calls you to repentance.
And with it, men find that eternal life in Him Who called them.
Having once been called and regenerated by the Power of the Holy
Spirit, a new creature is born in a Venue separate from the will of
men; and are not subordinate to the will of men, but submissive or
meek (praus) only to the voice of their only Master and Shepherd
Christ Jesus, the Author of the call. To be born of the Spirit of God
is not to be born of the spirit of codes, rules, and regulations.
Therefore, the stranger is one who comes in the name or warrant of
such things, which are not general laws emanating from the Body
of Christ, His ekklesia. This may seem harsh, but stranger is the
appropriate word. Because Christ Jesus is the Only Door, then
those who do not have that relationship with Him are strangers, not
being His several Ministerial Officers executing His Testament.

God, through His Son Christ Jesus, bestows conditionally Rights,

Powers, Privileges and Immunities to those called by Him. Let us
make no mistake about thisno one has any inherent Lawful right
to adoption by God. Thus, it is not a matter of "self-will" or "choice."
This is solely a matter of Grace of Him Who calls you to
repentance. In this sense, you are under the Grace of God, for
without it all would perish. But with it, men find that eternal life in
Him Who called. Having once been called and regenerated by the
Power of the Holy Spirit, a new creature is born in a Venue
separate from the will of men; and are not subordinate to the will of
men, but submissive or meek (praus) only to the voice of the
Shepherd Christ Jesus, the Author of the call. To be born of the
Spirit of God is not to be born of the spirit of codes, rules, and
regulations. Therefore, the stranger is one who comes in the name
or warrant of such things, which are not general laws emanating
from the Body of Christ, the church. This may seem harsh at first,
but because Christ Jesus is the Door then those who do not have
that relationship with Him, or His several Ministerial Officers
executing His Testament, stranger is the appropriate word:

"STRANGERS. By this term is intended third persons generally.

Thus the persons bound by a fine are parties, privies, and
strangers; the parties are either cognizors or cognizees; the privies
are such as are in any way related to those who levy the fine, and
claim under them by any right of blood, or other right of
representation [*Christ Jesus is our Mediator]; the strangers are all
other persons in the world, except only the parties and privies. In its
general legal signification the term is opposed to the word 'privy.'
Those who are in no way parties to a covenant [*establishing the
Inheritance and adoption], nor bound by it [*Lawless, anomian and
antinomians] are also said to be strangers to the covenant. Brown.
See Robbins v. Chicago, 4 Wall. 672, 18 L.Ed. 427; Wilson v.
Smith, 213 Ky. 836, 281 S.W. 1008, 1010; State v. Mills, 23 N.M.
549, 169 P. 1171, 1173; Gronewold v. Gronewold, 304 Ill. 11, 136
N.E. 489, 490. See, also, STRANGER." Black's Law Dictionary (4th
ed., 1968), p. 1590. [Emphasis and insertions added.]
Beware then, of those who come in sheep's clothing but inwardly
are ravening wolves, seeking whom they may devour:
"PERSONATE. In criminal law. To assume the person (character) of
another, without his consent or knowledge, in order to deceive
others, and, in such feigned character, to fraudulently do some act
or gain some advantage, to the harm or prejudice of the person
counterfeited. 2 East, P.C. 1010. To pass one's self off as another
having a certain identity. Lane v. U.S., C.C.A.Ohio, 17 F.2d 923."
Black's Law Dictionary (4th ed., 1957 & 1968), p. 1301. The
stranger is of the will of man, for the Ways of God are not the ways
of man:

Isaiah 55:8-9, "For my thoughts are not your thoughts,

neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For
as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my
ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than
your thoughts."

If you are an heir, then you must manifest such by bearing the fruits
of repentanceobedience and meeknessand claim that
Inheritance of God given you through Christ Jesus, "for the meek
shall inherit the earth." See Mt 5:5 and Ps 37:11. Such is the
foregoing noticebut it is not the earth you Inheritit is the Close
you Inherit, that Righteous Warrant in the Law which establishes
the Power to claim the land in His Name and not your own. We
cannot, and, in deed must not, use any commercial counterfeits.
Why? Because of the following maxims of Law:

"The cause and origin is the substance of the thing;

the cause and origin of a thing are a material part of
it." Black's Law Dictionary (4th ed., 1957 & 1968), p.
278; Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p.
2127. "That which is the principal part of a thing is the
thing itself." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914),
"Maxim," p. 2166.

If you use a commercial counterfeit, then the source is not God's

Lawit is the lex mercatoria. Thus, there is no sanctification or
separation from and between yourself and the commercial world.
You will have ignorantly imported the fiction over the Truth in Christ
Jesus, thereby marring the Seal of, and grieving, the Holy Spirit of
God our Father. You must declare the Law written on your heart
having the Seal of the Spirit of God which evidences and witnesses
your adoption by God our Father in and through Christ Jesus. It is
the adoption and evidence or witness of the Holy Spirit which gives
evidence or witness of interest in the Close declared by the Law.
The two are like a hand in a glove. If you use a commercial
counterfeit, the foot does not fit a glove made for the hand; neither
does a sock properly fit a hand. You must use the law fit for the
purpose and God's Law is the only law that governs the Close
given you by Him through Christ Jesus:

Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth." [This is the original act bringing the estate into being. All
other derivative estates are necessarily dependent upon and
governed by the Intent and Will of God, our Creator.]

"The law is the highest inheritance that the king possesses; for by
the law both he and all his subjects are ruled; and if there were no
law, there would be neither king nor inheritance." Bouvier's Law
Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2142.

"The law of God and the law of the land are all one; and both
preserve and favor the common good of the land." Bouvier's Law
Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2142.

"But one who is prevented from doing a contemplated illegal act

cannot maintain an action for damages for the interference with his
illegal purpose." Bangor, etc., R. Co. v. Smith, 49 Me. 9, 77 Am.D.
246.

"Trespass distinguished. Waste is an injury to the inheritance by

one rightfully in possession of the property. Trespass is an injury to
the estate or the use thereof by one who is a stranger to the title,
with no right whatever in the property." Stephenson v. National
Bank of Winter Haven, 109 So. 424, 425, 92 Fla. 347; Brigham v.
Overstreet, 57 S.E. 484, 128 Ga. 447, 10 L.R.A.N.S. 452, 11
Ann.Cas. 75; Dahlquist v. Mattson, 233 P. 883, 886, 40 Idaho 378;
Duvall v. Waters, 1 Bland 569, 18 Am.D. 350; Price v. Ward, 58 P.
849, 25 Nev. 203, 46 L.R.A. 459; Roots v. Boring Junction Lumber
Co., 92 P. 811, 94 P. 182, 50 Or. 298; Walker v. Fox, 2 S.W. 98, 85
Tenn. 154; Lander v. Hall, 34 N.W. 80, 69 Wisc. 326; Lowndes v.
Bettle (English), 33 L.J.Ch. 451.

The Close

Posted
Notice to All Breaking the Close over this land:
Obedient sons of God our Father solely by His Grace
through our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus the
Christ, to all breaking this Close of and over this land,
greetings from God our Father, and His Son Christ
Jesus:

In the Blessed Name and Authority of our Lord and

Saviour Jesus the Christ, by His Direction and
Mandate and under His Warrant in His Testament, we
hereby post the following at the gates to this Close of
and over this land and on the door posts of the
dwelling-house thereof: Whereas, the earth is the
Lord's and the fullness thereof, and His Intent
manifested in His original Act in His Testament of
bringing into being His Estate governs all derived from
it; therefore when God our Father sent His Son to
execute His Testament according to His Will, so His
Son sent into the world those called by Him from the
foundation of the world for His Dignity, Glory, Majesty
and Purposes; and,

Whereas, all Power in heaven and in earth hath been

committed to Christ Jesus by God our Father, Who
bestows the same upon those Whom He hath called
and sent into the world in execution of, and to
execute, the Righteous Judgments in His Holy Writ in
His Name and under His Warrants contained therein;
and,

Whereas, as many as believe in and on His Son He

gives the power to become the sons of God by and
through adoption, and a son hath Inheritance
common in all other sons through and in Christ Jesus,
therefore the Close of and over this land and all
Dominion in and of the Inheritance established by,
through and in Christ Jesus, have been Willed by God
our Father, through our Sovereign Lord and Saviour
Jesus the Christ, to His sons and his seed in
perpetuity; and,

Whereas, the Will of our King and Testator in His Law

and Testament instituting the Inheritance establishes
and governs the Dominion of those who Inherit the
Close of and over this land instituted by our King in
His Law and Testament, therefore those who act and
do contrary to the Will of our King and Testator are not
 His sons, but bastards, having no Close or Dominion
in and to any Inheritance established by the Will of
our Blessed King and Testator; and,

Whereas, the Law of God and the law of the land are
all one, and both favour and preserve the common
good of the land, therefore ignorance of God's Law is
no excuse, for all men know God, even His eternal
Power and Godhood, and are not presumed ignorant
of their eternal welfare; and,

Wherefore, any and all who enter here without

consent evidenced by Warrant in Law from God our
Father, through our Sovereign Lord and Saviour
Jesus the Christ, and His several appointed
Ministerial Officers having and being of one Mind in
the Christ, but enter either in their own name or by the
name of a stranger having no Dominion of and in the
Inheritance common among all bondservants of Jesus
the Christ: One, break this Close; Two, breach the
Peace of our King, by violating His Law establishing
this Close and all Powers appertaining to His Noble
and Sacred Ministerial Office; Three, disturb, and
thereby destroy the Domestic Tranquility of His sons;
Four, endanger His Inheritance in and of His sons by
adoption; and, Five, are, in His Law governing this
Close, trespassers, thieves, and robbers having not
entered through the Door; and,

Therefore, an action of trespass quare clausam fregit

will lie against all such who break this Close through
or under such pretenses or color of Law.

Junking the Title to Land

Many people have asked about how one can junk the registration to
land, similar to how one can junk the title to an automobile. One
brother we know of had a ten-acre plot of land. He sub-divided it
into two five-acre plots of land. He did the research on how to do
this himself, to avoid dividing his land through the usual means.
Anyway, once the land is divided, it erases the tax number
associated with that plot of land. Caesar then waits for the land to
be re-registered so it can assign two new tax numbers to the two
new pieces of land (which usually happens immediately when it's
done through the usual means). Our brother did not re-register his
land, and has never received a tax bill for his land in over ten years.

We also have two different laws from two different States,

explaining how to junk the title to the land. The first law is from
North Carolina which explains how one can junk the registration,
and it will be "as if such estate had never been so registered." The
second law is from New York and explains how to "withdrawal from
registration." These laws are duplicated here for your edification. To
find out the corresponding law in your state, you will have to do
some cross-referencing at the law library.

General Statutes of North Carolina

Chapter 43 Land Registration
Section 43-25 Release from registration

Whenever the record owner of any estate in lands the

title to which has been registered or attempted to be
registered in accordance with the provisions of this
Chapter, desires to have such estate released from
the provisions of said Chapter insofar as said Chapter
relates to the form of conveyance, so that such estate
may ever thereafter be conveyed, either absolutely or
upon condition or trust, by the use of any desired form
of conveyance other than the certificate of title
prescribed by said Chapter, such owner may present
his owner's certificate of title to such registered estate
to the register of deeds of the county wherein such
land lies, with a memorandum or statement written by
him on the margin thereof in the words following, or
words of similar import, to wit: "I (or we),
_____________, being the owner (or owners) of the
registered estate evidenced by this certificate of title,
do hereby release said estate from the provisions of
Chapter 43 of the General Statutes of North Carolina
insofar as said Chapter relates to the form of
conveyance, so that hereafter the said estate may,
and shall be forever until again hereafter registered in
accordance with the provisions of said Chapter and
acts amendatory thereof, conveyed either absolutely
or upon condition or trust by any form of conveyance
other than the certificate of title prescribed by said
Chapter, and in the same manner as if said estate
had never been registered." Which said
memorandum or statement shall further state that it is
made pursuant to the provisions of this section and
shall be signed by such record owner and attested by
the register of deeds under his hand and official seal,
and a like memorandum or statement so entered,
signed and attested upon the margin of the record of
the said owner's certificate of title in the consolidated
real property records in said register's office, with the
further notation made and signed by the register of
deeds on the margin of the certificate of title in the
consolidated real property records showing that such
entry has been made upon the owner's certificate of
title; and thereafter any conveyance of such
registered estate, or any part thereof, by such owner,
his heirs or assigns, by means of any desired form of
conveyance other than such certificate of title shall be
as valid and effectual to pass such estate of the
owner according to the tenor and purport of such
conveyance in the same manner and to the same
extent as if such estate had never been so
registered. (Ex. Sess. 1924. c. 40; 2000-140, s.
42(b).

New York State Consolidated Laws

ARTICLE 12 - Registering Title to Real Property

Section 404. Registered property to remain

registered. The bringing of property under this article
shall imply an agreement, running with the land and
binding upon the applicant and all his successors in
interest or title, that the property shall be subject to
the terms of this article, and all amendments and
alterations thereof, and all dealings with the property
so registered, or any estate, right or interest therein,
after the same has been brought under this article,
and all liens, incumbrances and charges upon the
same after the first registration thereof shall be
subject to the terms of this article.

Section 404-a. Withdrawal from registration in

certain instances. Notwithstanding the provisions of
section four hundred four of this chapter, a title to real
property which has been duly registered as provided
by article twelve thereof may be withdrawn from such
registration upon application to the supreme court by
the owner of the fee title to the property. An
application for such withdrawal from registration may
be filed with the registrar of the county in which the
title is then registered and shall be entitled "in the
matter of the application of (stating the name of the
registered owner) for the withdrawal from registration
of the title to certain lands." Such application, in such
form as may be approved by the registrar, must be
made by the registered owner of the fee of the real
property. It shall set forth and recite in detail the name
and postoffice address of the registered owner, the
number of the certificate of title last issued, the date of
the last registration of the title, a description of the
real property as stated in the certificate of title
together with a reference to the proper section, block
and lot numbers if any, a complete recital of all
memorials entered on the certificate of title, the
names and addresses of all persons owning any
incumbrance, charge, trust or lien on the premises, a
statement of all unpaid taxes, assessments and water
rates due and payable, a statement of the
circumstances existing which render continued
registration of the title impracticable and inexpedient,
and a prayer for the withdrawal from registration. The
application shall be duly verified and executed in
duplicate. The registrar shall file one copy as a
document in his office and enter the same as a
memorial on the certificate of title to which it relates.
The other copy shall be delivered to an official
examiner of title who shall forthwith proceed to
examine the title since the date of the first or initial
registration thereof and investigate the facts set forth
in the application. Thereafter he shall make a report in
writing to the supreme court of his findings and a
recommendation as to the proper disposition of the
application. The registrar shall set down a date for
hearing on the application in the "title part" of a
special term of the supreme court, which date shall be
not less than twenty days after the filing of the
application; and he shall notify by certified mail
demanding a personally signed return receipt card all
persons or parties who appear by the report of the
official examiner of title to have any interest in or
incumbrance, charge, trust, or lien upon the said real
property. At the hearing any of the parties in interest
may appear and consent or object to the granting of
the prayer of the application. Whether granted or
denied, the supreme court shall enter an order
disposing of the application and after such order is
filed with the clerk of the county a transcript or
certified copy of the same shall be filed with the
registrar and by him entered as a memorial on the
certificate of title. When the order of the supreme
court grants a withdrawal from registration of a title to
real property as herein provided, the registered owner
thereof shall forthwith deliver to the registrar and
surrender his owner`s duplicate certificate of title, or if
the same has been lost or destroyed a new owner`s
duplicate certificate of title obtained as provided in
section four hundred fourteen of this chapter. The
registrar shall then cause the owner`s duplicate
certificate of title to be recorded in the office of the
recording officer of the county in which the real
property is located, and thereafter permanently filed in
his own office. A certified copy of the record shall be
delivered to the registered owner as his future
evidence of title. The recording of the owner`s
duplicate certificate of title shall be notice of the
recitals and matters therein contained, and shall also
be notice of the fact that the title to the real property
therein described is no longer registered nor subject
to the provisions of article twelve of this chapter. From
the time of such recording and until any future or
further registration of the title thereof, said property
shall be and become as to all matters subsequent to
the time of such recording subject to all provisions of
law relating to real property the title to which has not
at any time been registered.

The final order and judgment of registration by the

court pursuant to which the aforesaid title to real
property was originally registered shall continue to be
binding and conclusive as a decree or judgment of the
supreme court in the same manner and to the same
extent and be of the same force and effect as if the
said title had not been withdrawn from registration in
accordance with the provisions of this section. The fee
of the registrar for all services rendered by him and by
the official examiner of title pursuant to this section
shall be the sum of one hundred dollars payable at
the time of filing of the application for withdrawal from
registration, and one-half of the said fee shall be
transferred by the registrar to the assurance fund
provided for by section four hundred and twenty-six of
this chapter. In addition thereto the applicant shall pay
to the registrar and the official examiner of title, their
necessary expenses and disbursements incurred in
connection with the withdrawal of the title from
registration.