ALDO FUNARO

AVOCAT LA COUR DAPPEL DE PARIS

MATRE EN DROIT (1962)
DIPLM DELINSTITUT DTUDE POLITIQUE DE PARIS (1961)

To:

NYSD Chief Judge Hon. Coleen McMahon

NYSD Chief Magistrate Judge Hon. Debra Freeman

NYSD Clerk of Court, Ruby J. Krajick,

NYSD District Executive Officer, Edward Anthony Friedland, Esq.

500 Pearl Street, NYC 10007 Certified USPO Mail

3. July 2017 af/hk

Dear Hon. McMahon, Hon. Freeman, Clerk Krajick, Dr. Friedland,

I am of counsel to Mr. Christian Viertel, who acts pro se in these judicial proceedings and on whose
behalf the instant administrative CORRECTION request is hereby RESUBMITTED for thorough analysis of
the evidence, and former MJ Dolingers calendar and recordings on 6/14/2001. Alternative Facts belong into
Branch IIs Oval Office and not into Branch IIIs Federal Courthouses.

For you convenience, a secure link to our Resubmission is at:

https://www.scribd.com/document/353072736/Motion-to-Vacate-for-Lack-of-Jurisdiction-ab-OVO-and-
RECUSAL

We must insist the CORRECTIONS are now due to reestablish lost integrity of judicial proceedings in
these two INDEX numbers, 01-571 and 08-7512 while adverse inference must be drawn from Koeltls blockage
for an Investigation into Pitmans trespass, and several highly dubitable creations of bogus Court Records.
Time is of the Essence.

"The Courts are what the judges make them, and the District Court in New York, from the time of
[District Judge] James Duane, [POTUS] Washingtons first appointment, has had a special distinction by
reason of the outstanding abilities of the men who have been called to its service."- Former Chief Justice
Hughes

In that spirit, I refer you to the submission in 01-571 and 08-7512 dated July 3, 2017 by Mr. Viertel that
appears to demonstrate that some abilities of the men [and also: women] were less than outstanding and
should not have been called to its service.

The ORDER issued 11-9-2016 by John Koeltl must be stricken, as well as D.E.#2 in 01-571 on simple
but undisputable grounds, that neither had jurisdiction. Jurisdiction arises in a criminal case pursuant to FRCrP
set by Congress, and this Court has no authority to create exemptions for failures in criminal procedure, or

Page 1 of 2
waive the Statute of Limitations for untimely process under the direct Control of the Court inside the Grand
Jury room that was crafted to favor Branch 2 of the government.

In 446 U.S. 147, 152 Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown (1984) SCOTUS ruled as follows:
[p]rocedural requirements established by Congress for gaining access to the federal Courts are not to be
disregarded by courts out of a vague sympathy for particular litigants.

This DEMAND is a CLAIM for "prejudicial extra-jurisdictional docket correction of false entries and
invalid documents", upon which relief must be granted.

It should be understood that we must consider using compulsory process and international treaty means
to ensure a satisfactory response because FAKE FUGITIVES who were made into a defendants have rights to
demand a zero tolerance policy for misconduct in the Federal Courts. The National Association of Criminal Defense
Lawyers stated in support of Judge Pauleys ruling at the CA2: misconduct by prosecutors and law enforcement officers is far
too common.

Lao-Tse taught us more than a millennium ago that we are not only responsible for what we do, but
also for what you did not do.

You may contact (914)-352-1839 for information, or may respond directly to Prof. Viertel or me.

I remain, sincerely

M. Aldo Funaro, of counsel

Copy: FBA, UIAnet.org, ABA

Mail: 9858 GLADES ROAD, SUITE D-3 #239, BOCA RATON, FL 33434 PB
33, CHEMIN DES PETIT PLAN 06800 CAGNES SUR MER - FRANCE +33 4 92 08 10 83)
funaro.juris@fondapio.org

Page 2 of 2