Professional Documents
Culture Documents
72. A borrowed from B 1 Million Pesos. C guaranteed and paid the obligation of A even
against the latter's will. Can C recover from A what he has paid to B?
a. Yes, a guarantor can recover from the debtor what the former had to pay the
creditor, even if the guaranty was against the debtor's will.
b. No, a person who pays the obligation of another without the knowledge and
consent of the debtor shall not be entitled to recover what he has paid to the
creditor. His recourse is to demand from the creditor what he has paid.
c. Yes, even a person not interested in the fulfillment of the obligation may pay the
obligation to the creditor for as long as the creditor gives his consent. Otherwise,
this would be a case of unjust enrichment on the part of the debtor.
d. No, a guarantor who pays the obligation of the debtor against the will of the debt
cannot recover the amount he paid because he is only subsidiarily liable and should
wait for the debtor to pay first and in the event of his failure to pay, the guarantor
may cause the payment of the obligation.
A guarantor can recover from the debtor what the former had to pay the creditor, even if the guaranty was
without the debtors consent or against his will, but the recovery will only be to the extent that the debtor
had been benefi ted. (See Arts. 1236 and 1237 and De Guzman v. Santos, 68 Phil. 371).
Art. 2054. A guarantor may bind himself for less, but not for more than the principal debtor, both as regards
the amount and the onerous nature of the conditions. Should he have bound himself for more, his
obligations shall be reduced to the limits of that of the debtor.
75. A borrowed PI Million from B. C guaranteed the obligation. Without C's knowledge,
the obligation was increased to P5Million. What is the effect of this increased as to the
obligation of C?
a. If the indebtedness is increased without the guarantors consent, he is liable only
to the amount he originally guaranteed.
b. When C guaranteed the obligation of the debtor without qualification he is
bound to pay the amount not only agreed upon at the time of the constitution of
the contract of guaranty but the obligation at the time of its maturity.
c. C would be liable for the increased amount if the debtor cannot pay the
obligation. A guarantor is an original promisor to the principal contract and thus
commits to pay if the principal debtor cannot pay whatever the amount is at the
time of the maturity of the obligation.
d. If the indebtedness is increased without the guarantor's consent, he is
completely released from the obligation as guarantor or surety.
Rule if Debt is Increased
If the indebtedness is increased without the guarantors consent, he is completely released from the
obligation as guarantor or surety. (Nat. Bank v. Veraguth, 50 Phil. 253).
Art. 2056. One who is obliged to furnish a guarantor shall present a person who possesses integrity,
capacity to bind himself, and sufficient property to answer for the obligation which he guarantees. The
guarantor shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the court of the place where this obligation is to be complied
with.
77. At what time must a guarantor possess the requirement for integrity?
a. The qualification of integrity in the guarantor or surety is required to be present
only at the time of the perfection of the contract of guaranty.
b. The qualification of integrity must be present during the entire time that the
contract of guaranty subsists.
c. The qualification of integrity must be present at the time of the perfection of the
contract of guaranty and for a reasonable time thereafter.
d. The qualification of integrity must be present at the time that the gurantor is
called upon to answer the obligation of the debtor.
The qualifications need only be present at the time of perfection of the contract
78. The benefit of division against the co-guarantors ceases in the same cases and for the
same reasons as the:
a. Benefit of exclusion
b. Benefit of excussion
c. Benefit of subrogation
d. Benefit of exemption
Art. 2065. Should there be several guarantors of only one debtor and for the same debt, the
obligation to answer for the same is divided among all. The creditor cannot claim from the guarantors
except the shares which they are respectively bound to pay, unless solidarity has been expressly stipulated.
The benefit of division against the co-guarantors ceases in the same cases and for the same reasons
as the benefit of excussion against the principal debtor.
79. Should there be several guarantors of only one debtor and for the same debt, the
obligation to answer for the same is:
a. Given to any of the guarantors
b. Divided among all of them equally (Art. 2065)
c. Extinguished
d. SolidaryH