Poultry Sector Survey 2007 2

CRESCENT 2007
Poultry
Sector
Survey
Cianjur & Bandung
Districts of West Java
Indonesia
Indonesian-Netherlands
Partnership Project on the
Control of HPAI
POULTRY SECTOR SURVEY IN BANDUNG AND CIANJUR DISTRICTS OF WEST JAVA PROVINCE
II | P A G E
PREFACE
The poultry sector survey in Cianjur and Bandung Districts was a joint activity
between the Netherlands Partnership Project on the Control of HPAI and Crescent.
This activity resulted in the comprehensive description of poultry production sector
and the map of poultry sector distribution; which was expected to become valid
reference in the surveillance implementation policy and vaccination strategy at field
level.
This activity was completed by the valuable support from local Dinas, farmers as
respondents, and other related parties. Allow us to convey our highest gratitude for
active participations from all parties, so that we could collect meaningful data and
fruitful information in order to complete this report.
We also would like to encourage all readers to convey their valuable critics in
order to improve this presentation.
III | P A G E
Contents
Preface ........................................................................................................iii
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1
A. Background....................................................................................................... 1
B. Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2
C. Outputs............................................................................................................. 2
D. Phase of Activity ............................................................................................... 2
2 METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................3
A. Time and Location ............................................................................................ 3
B. The General Approach of Survey...................................................................... 3
C. Survey Instrument ............................................................................................ 4
D. Data Collecting Technique................................................................................ 4
E. Method of Survey ............................................................................................. 7
1/ Sampling Technique .......................................................................................... 7
2/ Estimation of Sector 4 Population Number and Density................................... 9
3/ Biosecurity Condition ...................................................................................... 10
3 WORK PLAN..........................................................................................12
A. Work Stage ..................................................................................................... 12
B. Work Schedule................................................................................................ 14
4 ORGANIZATION ....................................................................................15
A. General ........................................................................................................... 15
B. Personnel........................................................................................................ 15
C. Mobilization of Expert Task and Responsibility ............................................. 15
D. Timeframe of Expert Deployment.................................................................. 17
5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION.....................................................................19

A. Survey Accomplishment ................................................................................. 19
B. Poultry Sector Location .................................................................................. 20
1/ Cianjur District ................................................................................................. 20
2/ Bandung District .............................................................................................. 30
IV | P A G E
C. Disease History ............................................................................................... 40

D. Vaccination Program ...................................................................................... 45
E. Production Input and Output Flow ................................................................ 48
1/ Sector 1 Farm .................................................................................................. 48
2/ Sector 2 Farm .................................................................................................. 49
3/ Sector 3 Farm .................................................................................................. 52
4/ Wet market, Slaughterhouse, and Poultry Collector ...................................... 59
F. Sector 4 Farm Profile ...................................................................................... 60
1/ Farm Location .................................................................................................. 60
2/ Farm Characteristics ........................................................................................ 61
3/ Biosecurity Condition ...................................................................................... 70
4/ Estimation of Population ................................................................................. 71
5/ Population Density .......................................................................................... 74
6/ Avian Influenza (AI) Vaccination Status........................................................... 76
7/ Production Input and Output Flow ................................................................. 77
G. Total Poultry Population Number and Density .............................................. 79
H. Poultry Sector Infrastructure.......................................................................... 83
1/ Cianjur District ................................................................................................. 83
2/ Bandung District .............................................................................................. 91
6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ..............................................95

A. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 95
B. Recommendations.......................................................................................... 96
7 Appendices.............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
V|P A G E
1 INTRODUCTION
A. Background
Avian influenza is still a serious threat to Asian countries; both to humans as well
as to animals. This disease is caused by a virus of H5N1 subtype of A type which has
been known to be very dangerous and had caused death to over 140 people and
millions of birds. The first case of H5N1 virus infection was detected in Hongkong in
1997 and reemerged around Asia throughout 2003.
Currently, the virus has spread to some areas in Indonesia and in other Asian
countries which drove serious concern over the possibility of a new virus by mutation
that could transfer among humans and has the potency to inflict worldwide pandemic.
This condition had spurred the Government of Indonesia, World Health Organization
(WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), other international bodies, and local
partners to collaborate in controlling the virus and to prevent it to turn into a
dangerous pandemic. The current strategy that has been developed to control the
avian influenza disease in Indonesia is 1). To increase biosecurity practices; 2). To
vaccinate all poultry in the infected as well as the suspected areas; 3). To do limited
depopulation and compensation; 4). To control poultry and its product movement
traffic; 5). To do surveillance and back-trace; 6). To do restocking; 7). To do stamping
out in the newly infected areas; 8). To encourage public awareness; 9). To perform
monitoring and evaluation to all the above practices.
In order to support the strategy of bird flu control, the Indonesian-Netherlands
Partnership Project on the Control of HPAI will collaborate with local institutions to
perform the surveillance and testing of intervention strategies for the control of avian
influenza in Indonesia. The objective of the field studies is to provide information for
the development of provincial and national vaccination, surveillance and other HPAI
control strategies.
To support the selection of suitable areas for the expansion of the field studies,
surveys of the poultry production sector in these sub-districts have to be made. In
these surveys information should be collected on poultry population, disease
prevalence, farm types, movement, marketing and slaughtering of poultry. The
selection on the new area where to implement the new field studies on surveillance
and vaccination strategies will be based on the results of this poultry sector survey. In
the frame of the above interest, there had been a work contract between Indonesia
and the Netherlands that constituted in an Indonesian-Netherlands Partnership Project
on the Control of HPAI and CRESCENT (contract no.: Pc07/WI0791) for poultry sector
1|P A G E
survey in three sub districts in Cianjur district and three sub districts in Bandung
district.
B. Objectives
The objectives of this poultry sector survey were to:
1. Provide a description of the entire poultry production sector, the poultry disease
situation, poultry marketing, (participatory) poultry organizations and
infrastructure.
2. Produce map(s) of the poultry distribution in the chosen six sub-districts.
C. Outputs
The outputs of this poultry sector survey were:
1. The description of the entire poultry production sector, the poultry disease
situation, poultry marketing, (participatory) poultry organizations and
infrastructure.
2. The map (s) of the distribution of poultry in the six sub-districts.
D. Phase of Activity
The phases of this poultry sector survey were to:
1. Perform internal coordination and socialization of poultry sector survey to Dinas
Peternakan and target respondents at survey area.
2. Prepare a draft for a questionnaire to collect information from sector 1, 2, and 3 of
the poultry sector, hatcheries, collecting points, slaughterhouses, and poultry wet
market (poultry population, types, disease situation, HPAI outbreaks, trading chain,
and sources of production input).
3. Survey (interviews) to collect the information on sector 1, 2, and 3 of the poultry
sector, hatcheries, poultry wet markets, collecting points and slaughterhouses.
4. Establish the exact location by GPS of the poultry farms, collector points and other
trading places of live poultry and transfer this to a map (scale: 1: 10,000)
5. Evaluate biosecurity condition and make an estimation of sector 4 poultry
population in villages (desa) and sub-villages (kampung) (poultry numbers, types,
GPS location) and any moving poultry/duck flocks.
6. Collect information through interviews and questionnaires on the existing
infrastructure for the poultry sector and transfer this information as much as
possible to a map.
7. Analysis of data from the questionnaires, estimates and other sources,
presentation of data in easy accessible excel tables and preparation of summary
tables.
8. Preparation of a draft report of the results of the survey (hard and soft copies)
9. Preparation of the final report after receiving comments from the project.
2|P A G E
2 METHODOLOGY
A. Time and Location
Data collection for the poultry sector survey was completed in the period of
August to September. The poultry sector survey location covered three sub districts in
each district; they were:
1. Mande, Cilaku, and Karangtengah in Cianjur District
2. Majalaya, Arjasari, and Rancaekek in Bandung District
B. The General Approach of Survey

The essence of this Poultry Sector Survey in Bandung and Cianjur Districts of
West Java Province was to approach the survey through three main activities; i.e.
survey, mapping, and data analysis. The survey and mapping aim for targets: 1)
Poultry farms in sector 1, 2, 3, and 4; 2) Wet market trading live poultry; 3) Collecting
points; 4) Slaughterhouses; 5) Public and private veterinary support services; 6) Poultry
association; and 7) suppliers for production input (feed, medicine, and vaccine). The
analysis was based on data and information obtained from the survey.
The results expected to come up through this survey are 1) Location of the farms,
wet markets trading live poultry, collecting points, and slaughterhouses; 2) Information
about owners of poultry business; 3) Number of poultry and type; 4) Number of
traders; 5) Poultry population; 6) Poultry disease situation (incl. AI outbreaks,
vaccination program); 7) product produced (number and type); 8) Marketing of
products; 9) Source, type, and number of poultry traded; and 10) Source of production
inputs (DOC, pullets, feed, vaccines, medicines, etc); and 11) any integration and
connection and poultry industry participation in disease control. The mapping activity
was to cover the exact locations of the poultry farms (sector 1, 2, 3, and 4), collecting
points, slaughterhouses, wet markets, Dinas Peternakan, suppliers and traders of
production input, and poultry population density of poultry sector 4 using the
geographical information system method. The analyzed data and information were to
describe the poultry population, types, disease situation, HPAI outbreaks, trading, and
source of DOC in charts and tables. Furthermore, the survey also covered sector 4 in
terms of number of population, population density, and biosecurity condition at village
and sub district level.
The outputs of these activities of survey, mapping, and data analysis were the
description of the entire poultry production sector (including the poultry disease
situation; poultry marketing; participatory poultry organizations, and infrastructure)
3|P A G E
and the map(s) of the poultry distribution in the six sub districts. Such outputs were
expected to serve as reference in the implementation of surveillance and vaccination
strategy in new areas performed by Indonesian-Netherlands Partnership Project on the
Control of HPAI
Schematically, the survey study approach can be seen in Figure 2-1.
C. Survey Instrument
Instruments used in this Poultry Sector Survey were questionnaires and
checklists structurally made for data coverage and survey efficacy (see the
attachment). Questionnaire and checklist are data collection tools that are directly
conveyed to respondents/target through statements.
The questionnaire used both open and closed questions; the closed ones
provided respondent with the answers to choose; while the open ones asked the
respondents view on certain subject in question.
D. Data Collecting Technique

Primary and secondary data were collected for the survey. Secondary data was
obtained from Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan Kabupaten Cianjur and Dinas
Peternakan and Perikanan Kabupaten Bandung.
Primary data was collected through survey by using questionnaires and in depth
interviews to respondents. The respondents were all parties related to the poultry
sector from upstream to downstream. This was to see the pattern and intensity of
flock movement which were very important in the context of AI disease control.
The tracing of source and type of primary and secondary data can be seen in
Table 2-1 and Table 2-2.
4|P A G E
Figure 2-1. The Approach in Poultry Sector Survey Study
5|P A G E
Table 2-1. Source and Type of Primary Data

Person in
No Sector Respondent Data Type
Charge
1 Sector 1, 2: Farm manager Farm location (address and GPS details) Supervisor
Grandparent stock, Information on owner, part of
parent stock, layer association/integration, etc.
farm, broiler farm Number of farm and type of poultry
Disease situation (including AI cases, vaccination
programs)
Product marketing
Production input source (DOC, pullets, feed, vaccine,
medicine, etc.)
2 Sector 3: broiler, Farm manager/ Farm location (address and GPS details) Enumerator
kampong chicken, owner Information on owner, part of
quail, pigeon, plasma association/integration, etc.
farms Number of farm and type of poultry
programs)
Product marketing
medicine, etc.)
3 Sector 4: kampung Owner Poultry number Enumerator
chicken, duck, muscovy Poultry type
duck, quail, goose GPS details
Poultry movement
4 Wet Markets (live Trader Market location (address and GPS details) Enumerator
poultry trading) Number of trader
Source, type, and number of poultry traded
Disease situation (including AI cases)
5 Collecting Points Trader Farm location (address and GPS details) Enumerator
Information on owner, part of
association/integration, etc.
Number of farm and type of poultry
programs)
Product marketing
medicine, etc.)
6 Slaughterhouses Owner/manager Farm location (address and GPS details) Enumerator
Information on owner, part of
association/integration, etc.
Number of farm and type of poultry
programs)
Product marketing
medicine, etc.)
7 Government support Animal Health Staff and facilities (including GPS details) of Dinas Enumerator
for veterinary service Section of District Peternakan
Dinas Peternakan AI disease surveillance and control program by Dinas
Peternakan (field implementation)
8 Private sector support Technical service Staff and facilities (including GPS details) of private Enumerator
for veterinary service sector
Employees of private sector working in the area in
term of AI disease surveillance and control measures
9 Poultry farm Administrator Active poultry associations, their members and Enumerator
association and activities
integration Poultry association/integration, plasma, and other
active commercial connection (members and
activities)
Participatory poultry disease control program
(groups and their activities)
10 Supplier and trader of Owner Supplier and trader (names, addresses, and GPS Enumerator
production input (DOC, details)
6|P A G E
Person in
No Sector Respondent Data Type
Charge
feed, medicines, and Product and quantity traded
vaccines) Customers
Table 2-2. Source and Type of Secondary Data
No Area Information Noted Person in Charge

1 District (Dinas Peternakan) Poultry population Supervisor
Poultry type
Disease history
Number of farmer and trader
Location and number poultry farms sector 1, 2, 3
Location and number of Hatchery
Location and number of wet market
Location and number of poultry slaughterhouse and poultry
slaughtering site
Location and number of farmer association and poultry trader
Location and number of collecting point
Location and number of plasma farmer
Location and number of production input company
2 Sub District Poultry population Enumerator
(Dinas Branch) Poultry type
Disease history
Number of farmer and trader
Location and number poultry farms sector 1, 2, 3
Location and number of Hatchery
Location and number of wet market
Location and number of poultry slaughterhouse and poultry
slaughtering site
Location and number of farmer association and poultry trader
Location and number of collecting point
Location and number of plasma farmer
Location and number of production input company
E. Method of Survey
The method used in this survey was quantitative-descriptive approach; i.e. the
population in this survey was of poultry sector 1, 2, 3, and 4, wet markets trading live
poultry, collecting points, slaughterhouses, Dinas Peternakan, suppliers and traders in
the chosen six sub districts (kecamatan).
1/ Sampling Technique
The data collection technique used for the collection of poultry sector 1, 2, and 3,
trader, collecting point, poultry slaughterhouse, and wet market was by census
approach; i.e. all member of population was taken as respondent.
The data of address and number of sector 1, 2, 3 farmers , collectors,
slaughterhouse, and wet market in Cianjur district was obtained from Dinas Perikanan
and Peternakan of Cianjur district; as for data of Bandung was from Dinas Peternakan
and Perikanan of Bandung district. The sector 3 poultry data was obtained from KCD
field operative and Balai Desa (Kelurahan office/village administration office) at each
surveyed sub district. Furthermore, in order to acquire the exact address of the
respondents, the enumerators were accompanied by KCD field operatives and local
villagers.
7|P A G E
Furthermore, the sampling technique for the estimation of poultry number and
density on sector 4; the team applied the procedure of multi stage random sampling.
The sample was chosen randomly with the first level of village selection at surveyed
each sub district. Afterwards, the RW was selected for each chosen village and finally
all poultry farmer in that RW was picked as respondents.
The sampling size taken was calculated by the following formula (at 95%
confidence level):
Note:
n = sample size
s2 = expected variance (with assumption of 10 poultry/RW)
L = desired absolute precision (with assumption of 5 poultry/RW)
Based on the above formula, the sample size taken was 16 RW/sub district and
the interview was to farmers in each selected RW.
The questionnaire for sector 4 farmers was of two types; i.e.:
1) The standard questionnaire (short interview); which covered the aspects
of: type and number of kept poultry, the source of poultry, and the
marketing target.
2) The complete questionnaire (long interview); which covered the aspects in
the standard questionnaire and completed with additional inquiries on:
purpose of poultry keeping, AI disease history, AI vaccination history,
poultry keeping system, handling of sick and dead poultry, cage and tools
sanitation, and flock movement control around the farm area.
The sampling technique for the sector 4 respondents could be described as
follows:
1) Four villages were picked out at sub district level. The village profile of
every sub district was acquired from sub district office.
2) At every chosen village, four RWs were randomly picked out. The RW
profile was acquired from the village administration office.
3) Every household with poultry in the selected RW was then chosen as
respondent and was interviewed with standard questionnaire (short
interview). The household with poultry location data was acquired from
RW administrator. When enumerators visited the farmer, they were
accompanied by RW administrator. For Bandung district, due to several
technical difficulties in the field (the number of sector 3 farm was too many
to cover in such a short timeframe because of the relatively far distance
from one farm to another and the road condition was quite hard) then the
selection of sector 4 respondent was through purposive sampling at each
chosen RW; i.e. 20 farmers/RW. Random sampling in this case was difficult
since there was no data of poultry farmer at village level.
8|P A G E
4) The interview with complete questionnaire (long interview) was to 5

farmers/RW that were randomly and systematically picked out by
enumerator; i.e. enumerator randomized the first 10 farmers interviewed
(for example: the n farmer, and the next is the 10+n, 20+n, 30+n, and 40+n
farmers; with the assumption of 50 farmers/RW minimum). As for the
Bandung case, the enumerator randomized the 20 selected farmers; for
example: the n farmer, and the next is the 4+n, 8+n, 12+n, and 16+n
farmers to be interviewed with complete questionnaire.
2/ Estimation of Sector 4 Population Number and Density

The poultry population size estimation on sector 4 farm was carried out by three
approaches; they were: (1) determination of average poultry ownership per
household, (2) determination of proportion of household keeping poultry, and (3)
calculation of number of household existed in sub district and sampled village.
The estimation of sector-4 poultry population was then calculated by the
following formula:
Population number estimation = Average number of ownership/household x
proportion of household keeping poultry x
number of household
Notes:
The average number of poultry ownership at the sampled village was estimated by
the data of poultry ownership in the four surveyed RWs in the respective village.
Furthermore, the average number of poultry ownership at sampled sub district was
estimated by the data of average number of poultry ownership in the four
surveyed villages of the respective sub district and this number was used as the
estimation factor for the other villages that did not belong to the sampled ones.
The proportion of household owning poultry at sampled village was estimated by
the data of proportion of household keeping poultry in the four RWs at the
respective surveyed villages. Furthermore, the proportion of household owning
poultry at the sampled sub district was estimated by the proportion of household
owning poultry in the four surveyed villages of the respective sub district; and this
number was used as the estimator for household owning poultry at the other non-
sampled villages.
For Bandung district; the difficulties faced in the field had forced the team to do
sampling at every RW which resulted in the unknown proportion of household
keeping poultry at each sampled RW. Therefore, the estimation of proportion of
household keeping poultry was done by random sampling as many as 50
respondents in three RWs of one sampled village at each sampled sub district; by
this the team obtained the proportion of household keeping poultry from 150
respondents for each sampled sub district. This data was then used as the
estimator for proportion of household keeping poultry at the other surveyed sub
districts.
9|P A G E
The data of number of household per RW was obtained by a later survey; and the
number of household per village was acquired by demographic notes on each sub
district.
The calculated population number estimation was the estimation at the surveyed
sub district and sampled village level. In order to calculate the population number
estimation at surveyed sub district or village in the surveyed sub district that did not
belong to the sampled village, the used average number of poultry ownership was the
average number of ownership for sub district surveyed level. Furthermore, in order to
calculate the estimation of population number at sampled village level, the used
average number of ownership per household was the average number of ownership
for the respective village.
The proportion of household keeping poultry was used for sub district level; i.e.
for the calculation of population number estimation both at surveyed sub district as
well as at sampled village.
The poultry population density was calculated by the following formula:
The population density was calculated for surveyed sub district level and village
in the respective sub district.
3/ Biosecurity Condition
In order to know the biosecurity condition around poultry sector 4; the team
sampled five farmers of sector 4 as respondents from each of the selected RW as
previously described in the above sampling technique. The biosecurity aspect
observed included 7 variables; they were (1) poultry keeping system, (2) hygiene
(including the sanitation around cage, feed bowls, drinking bowls, and cage yard), (3)
sick bird handling, (4) dead bird handling, (5) poultry feces handling, (6) quarantine
measure, and (7) movement control around the farm area.
The type of biosecurity questions and their value can be seen in the next Table
2-3.
Table 2-3. Type of Question and Value for Biosecurity Aspect
No. Type of Question Value Range Remarks

1 Handling of sick poultry 0-1 0=Sick poultry is not separated from the healthy ones
1=Sick poultry is separated from the healthy ones
2 Handling of dead poultry 0-1 0=Dead poultry is not buried/burned down
1= Dead poultry is buried/burned down
3 Quarantine measure for new poultry 0-1 0=New poultry is not separated from the old ones in
one week minimum
1= New poultry is separated from the old ones in one
week minimum
4 Poultry keeping system 1-4 1=Poultry is kept by freely roaming inside and outside
the house yard
2=Poultry is kept by freely roaming inside the fenced
house yard
3=Poultry is caged with fenced cage yard
4=Poultry is kept within the closed cage always
10 | P A G E
No. Type of Question Value Range Remarks

5 Cage hygiene in general 15 1=Very dirty
2=Dirty
3=Relatively clean
4=Clean
5=Very clean
6 Feed bowl hygiene 15 1=Very dirty
2=Dirty
3=Relatively clean
4=Clean
5=Very clean
7 Drinking bowl hygiene 15 1=Very dirty
2=Dirty
3=Relatively clean
4=Clean
5=Very clean
8 Cage yard cleanliness 15 1=Very dirty
2=Dirty
3=Relatively clean
4=Clean
5=Very clean
9 Handling of poultry manure 0-1 0=Stacked on the ground surface (open dumping)
1=Buried in hole in the ground/put in closed sack
10 Poultry movement control around the farm 0-1 0=No control
area 1=There is control measures
Total 5 - 29
The biosecurity condition was then categorized into three groups: good,
intermediate, and poor according to the total value of the seven variables observed.
This biosecurity grouping and the total of the seven values of variables observed can
be seen in Table 2-4.
Table 2-4. Group of Biosecurity Condition
Total Value of the Seven Observed Variables Biosecurity Category
< 17 Poor
17 - < 22 Intermediate
22 Good
11 | P A G E
3 WORK PLAN
A. Work Stage
Sequentially, the stages of this poultry sector survey covered the activity
preparation, desk study and secondary data collection, questionnaire formation,
questionnaire try-out and revision, pre-survey activity, survey implementation, data
recapitulation and input to computer, data processing and analysis, mapping, report
drafting, internal discussion and report revisions, and final report submission.
Those are elaborated as follows:
1. Activity Preparation
Internal coordination
Proposal revision
Expert team discussion
Expected result: activity implementation details
2. Desk Study and Secondary Data Collection
Gathering secondary data and information of both qualitative and quantitative
through the internet or related sources.
Studying and doing analysis information from other sources.
Expected result: collected important data and information that could support
the construction of study instrument and reporting.
3. Questionnaire Formation
Building up questionnaire to be used in interview to selected respondent.
Expected result: formulized items of question to be used as primary data
collection tool.
4. Questionnaire Try-out and Revision
Performing test of questionnaire on to selected volunteers whose
characteristics resemble the actual field respondent.
Obtaining comments from Wageningen International on the proposed
questionnaires
Expected result: formulated reliable questionnaires to be used as primary data
collection tool.
12 | P A G E
5. Pre-survey Activity
Performing internal coordination for field data collection based on the
formulized research method, enumerator selection, and permit preparation for
data collection at district/municipal (kabupaten/kota) and sub-district
(kecamatan) levels.
Performing training to equip enumerators with basic knowledge and
comprehension over poultry sector survey.
Expected result: the prepared site target and trained enumerator in primary
data collection.
6. Survey Implementation
Performing the collection of primary data and other supportive data in the field
through formulized questionnaire.
Resuming daily activity in a log consisting of important events during field
survey.
The district/municipal coordinator performs periodical supervision to observe
the survey implementation and help out enumerators with problems faced in
the field.
Expected result: gathered valid and reliable primary data from the survey.
7. Data Recapitulation and Computer Input
Performing primary data recapitulation from each questionnaire by certain
coding used for further data analysis.
Performing data input to computer.
Expected result: gathered comprehensive and ready-to-analyze data.
8. Data Processing and Analysis
Performing data processing according to the selected method.
Expected result: accurate and reliable data analysis.
9. Mapping
Performing mapping based on the GPS data acquired from the field.
Expected result: map of the distribution of poultry in the 4 sub-districts
10. Report Drafting
The elaboration of the whole study activity implemented including results and
discussions, conclusions, and recommendations.
Expected result: report substance that will need further revisions.
11. Internal discussions and report revisions.
Discussion between expert team and Netherlands Partnership Project on The
Control of HPAI for the report substance revision.
Expected result: final report substance revision.
13 | P A G E
12. Final Reporting

The final report of the whole poultry sector survey was the revised version of draft
report that had been amended through comments from and discussion with the
employer.
B. Work Schedule
Table 3-1. Schedule of Activity
Timeline
No Activity August September October November December
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
I Preparation
1.1 Planning and
Activity Schedule
Development in
Accordance to TOR
1.2 Internal
coordination;
aiming for the
same
comprehension
and perception on
the substance
under study and to
develop activity
planning
1.3 External
coordination
1.4 Gathering study
material (desk
study) related to
substance under
study
1.5 Questionnaire

revision
1.6 Questionnaire try-
out and revision
1.7 Pre-survey
II Implementation
2.1 Survey in Cianjur
2.2 Survey in Bandung
2.3 Data Retracing
2.4 Data recapitulation
and input
2.5 Data processing
and analysis
2.6 Mapping
III Reporting
3.1 Draft report
3.2 Submission of draft
report
3.4 Internal discussion

and report revision
3.5 Final reporting
3.6 Submission of draft
final report
3.7 Submission of final

report
14 | P A G E
4 ORGANIZATION
A. General
CRESCENT had formed a team that consists of two groups of expert; i.e. main
expert team and supporting assistant who have solid experience in their respective
field. Considering the inter-related work, the working team must collaborate
effectively and efficiently under the coordination of the Team Leader.
B. Personnel
To be able to perform the study appropriately in an effective and efficient
manner, this study would need performers with high integrity organized in a compact
and systematic manner. The organization for the poultry sector survey is shown in the
following diagram.
C. Mobilization of Expert Task and Responsibility

1. Team Leader
To coordinate and execute the whole technical aspect and administration of the
activity.
To give out technical instruction to all team member, to conduct supervision on
the activity implementation, and to maintain fulfilling collaboration among team
members in work completion.
To directly involve in activity implementation together with all team member.
To conduct technical consultation together with all team member to employer.
To specifically take responsibility for every step of activity implementation; from
coordination to reporting.
15 | P A G E
2. Epidemiology Expert
To coordinate intensively with all team member.
To involve in and take responsibility in the development of study instrument as
guideline to primary data and information collection, especially from the bird flu
epidemiology point of view at target site.
To identify the bird flu movement in the target site.
To involve in and take responsibility in data and information analysis to
comprehend the whole target poultry production sectors, any condition of
disease at target site, patterns of poultry marketing, organization, and
infrastructure.
To involve in and take responsibility in draft and final reporting.
3. Animal Health Expert
guideline to primary data and information collection, especially from the animal
health point of view at target site.
To identify diseases attacking poultry at target site and their handling.
infrastructure.
4. Bio-statistics Expert
To develop appropriate survey method as guidance for data and information
collection, especially in the determination of sample size and analysis method
used.
guidance in the primary data and information collection.
To take responsibility in data and information recapitulation acquired from the
field survey.
To involve in and take responsibility in data processing and analysis in order to
acquire complete description on the whole poultry production sector, disease
condition, patterns of poultry marketing, organization, and infrastructure at
target site, and to estimate the size of poultry in sector 4.
5. Animal Farming Expert
16 | P A G E

guidance in the primary data and information collection, especially in the aspect
of animal production.
To identify input source of poultry production, production type, and condition of
the poultry production organization and infrastructure.
infrastructure.
6. Geographical Information System (GIS) Expert
To perform desk study on GIS mapping applications.
guidance in the primary data and information collection, especially in the aspect
of GPS information processing.
To perform analysis on primary and secondary data and other information in the
mapping of poultry distribution at 4 target sub-districts (kecamatan).
To develop concept/formula for GIS mapping application.
To develop poultry distribution map on target sites using GIS.
7. Administration Support
To perform activity implementation administration.
8. Computer Operator Support
To input data and information into computer for further analysis.
To assist team in data analysis.
9. Enumerator
To take responsibility in field data and information collection using the designed
questionnaire.
To compose daily field log according to the developed format.
D. Timeframe of Expert Deployment

Timeline
No Team Position August September October November December
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 Drh. Deni Noviana, PhD Team Leader
17 | P A G E
Timeline
No Team Position August September October November December
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Animal Health Expert
2 Drh. Abdul Zahid Ilyas, MSi Epidemiology Expert
3 Agus Setiyono, DVM, Ph.D Animal Health Expert
4 Ir. Etih Sudarnika, MSi Bio-statistics expert
5 Rina Andriani Animal Farming Expert
6 Delon Marthinus GIS expert
18 | P A G E
5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

This chapter will cover results of the field survey from various aspects that had
been completed through the poultry survey activity. Systematically, these aspects
cover (i) survey accomplishments; especially on covered target, poultry population
and number of respondents of poultry sector at survey sites, (ii) geographic features of
poultry sector; including spatial distribution and the amount and density of poultry
population (of sector 1, 2, and 3) at every survey site, (iii) the disease history for the
last three years suffered by the poultry sectors at survey sites; especially the disease
history of avian influenza (AI), Newcastle (ND), and gumboro (IBD), (iv) the existing
vaccination program done by sector 1, 2, and 3; especially for avian influenza,
Newcastle, and gumboro diseases, and (v) the input and output flow of production on
all poultry sectors at survey sites.
The sector 4 poultry profile; which includes farm location, farm characteristics,
biosecurity conditions, estimation of poultry population, population density,
vaccination status, and production input and output flow; will be specifically discussed
within this chapter. The end part of this chapter will cover the population number and
density at the whole sectors (1, 2, 3, and 4) and the existing infrastructure conditions
that support the poultry sector at survey sites.
A. Survey Accomplishment
The poultry sector survey had been completed within the following time frame:
1. The period of 28 August 2007 until 1 September 2007 was for survey of three sub
districts in Cianjur district; i.e. Cilaku, Karangtengah, and Mande sub districts
2. The period of 4 September until 8 September 2007 was for survey of three sub
districts in Bandung district; i.e. Arjasari, Rancaekek, and Majalaya dub districts
3. The period of 24 September until 28 September 2007 was for a quick retracing the
two survey districts to complete any missing data and information gained on the
first survey.
4. The period of 19 November until 23 November 2007: additional data collection on
the number of household/RW at surveyed sites in order to accurately calculate the
poultry owner proportion number in sampled village.
The below two tables; Table 5-1 and Table 5-12; show the complete target list
and number of respondent of poultry sector surveyed at each sub district on the
respective Cianjur and Bandung districts.
19 | P A G E
Table 5-1. Survey Target and Number of Respondent at Three Sub Districts in Cianjur District
Number of Respondent per Sub District
Respondent Total
Cilaku Mande Karangtengah
Sector 1 - 1 - 1
Sector 2 3* 2* 1 6
Sector 3 28 10 7 45
Sector 4 551 516 410 1,477
Poultry Infrastructure 1 1
Poultry Slaughterhouse (TPA) - - - -
Collecting Point (TPnA) 2 - 4 6
Wet Market 2 2
Note: * Two sector 2 farmers; one in Cilaku and one in Mande refused to be interviewed
Table 5-2. Survey Target and Number of Respondent at Three Sub Districts in Bandung District
Number of Respondent per Sub District
Respondent Total
Rancaekek Arjasari Majalaya
Sector 1 - - - 1
Sector 2 - 2 - 2
Sector 3 60 62 8 130
Sector 4 234 280 186 674
Hatchery 1 - - 1
Poultry Infrastructure 1 1
Poultry Slaughterhouse (TPA) 8 - 4 12
Collecting Point (TPnA) - - 6 6
Wet Market 2 - 2 4
As for the sector 4 average number of poultry ownership for each household, the
proportion of household keeping poultry, and the number of household in the six
surveyed sub districts will be conveyed in the sub chapter of sector 4 poultry profile.
B. Poultry Sector Location

1/ Cianjur District
a. Geographical Condition
In general, the three surveyed sub districts in Cianjur (Mande, Cilaku, and
Karangtengah) were located on the same expanse with relatively medium elevation;
i.e. about 380 m asl. The elevation data can be seen in the next Table 5-3.
Table 5-3. Elevation of Three Sampled Sub Districts in Cianjur District
Elevation (m asl)
Sub District
Minimum Maximum Average
Mande 211 794 382
Cilaku 345 497 416
Karangtengah 285 413 342
Average 380
Figure 5-1 shows the geographic position of all poultry sector components that
had been surveyed at the three sub districts including sector 1, 2, 3, 4 farms,
slaughterhouse (TPA), collecting point (TPnA), wet market, and regional office for
animal and fish farming (Dinas) which was the component for poultry infrastructure.
All locations of poultry sector components were connected one another by the road
facility. The roads varied in condition; from asphalt road, rocky road, to dirt road; all
were fit for large four-wheeled vehicle (truck) cruising that adequately support the
process of production input-output, marketing of output/yield, and Dinas access for
surveillance and service. Furthermore; in Karangtengah and Cilaku; there were two
20 | P A G E
lines of provincial street which were the main inter-provincial connecting highway road
of West Java and DKI Jakarta provinces. These conditions were very advantageous for
poultry sector activities on the three sub districts.
In Mande there was one farm of sector 1, two farms of sector 2, and ten farms of
sector 3. In Cilaku there were two farms of sector 2 and 28 farms of sector 3. While in
Karangtengah there was one farm of sector 2 and 6 of sector 3.
The geographic distribution of sector 3 poultry farms in the three sub districts
(Mande, Cilaku, and Karangtengah) in Cianjur can be seen in Figure 5-2 to Figure 5-4.
Figure 5-2 tells us the sector 3 farms of Mande sub district were focused on the central
part of the whole sub district region and there were no farm to find in the western and
eastern part of this sub district. On the other two sub districts; Cilaku (Figure 5-3) and
Karangtengah (Figure 5-4); the sector 3 farms were relatively distributed equally to the
whole sub districts area.
In Mande, Cilaku, and Karangtengah, the average distance of one commercial
farm to the other nearest farm estimated by the farmers was 704477 m, 9791231 m,
and 19001614 m respectively. In Karangtengah, that distance was already according
to the technical minimum requirement and the regional law. But in Mande and Cilaku,
those distances were less than 1,000 meter; which means that they did not exactly
play it by the book. Especially in Mande where it had one parent stock farm (sector 1)
which should require high biosecurity requirements, then the minimum distance
should be taken seriously into account.
b. Population Number, Density, and Composition

Sector 1
In Cianjur district survey area there was only one farm of sector 1; i.e. in Mande
sub district. The poultry population in this farm was 226,377 birds with the
composition of 77,716 layers and 148,661 broilers (see Figure 5-5). By the total area of
7,707.2 ha, then the poultry population density of sector 1 in Mande was up to 29.4
poultry/ha (Figure 5-6).
21 | P A G E
Figure 5-1. Poultry Sector Geographical Distribution in Cianjur District
22 | P A G E
Figure 5-2. Geographical Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farm in Mande Sub District
23 | P A G E
Figure 5-3. Geographical Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farm in Cilaku Sub District
24 | P A G E
Figure 5-4. Geographical Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farm in Karangtengah Sub District
25 | P A G E
Figure 5-5. Poultry Population of Sector 1 in Mande Sub District
Figure 5-6. Poultry Population Density of Sector 1 in Mande Sub District
Sector 2
Most of the poultry in sector 2 farms in the surveyed area was of layer type. The
layer population in Mande and Karangtengah was 200,000 birds and 42,000 birds
respectively. And the broiler type in Cilaku sub district recorded the number of 85,000
birds. In the whole sense, the total number of sector 2 poultry in the three sub
districts was lower than the actual condition since there were two sector 2 farmers
who refused to be interviewed; i.e. one farmer in Mande and one in Cilaku. The
highest number of poultry population density of sector 2 was found in Mande sub
district which was 26.0 poultry/ha and the lowest was found Karangtengah sub district
which was 7.4 poultry/ha (the area of Karangtengah sub district was 5,670.6 ha).
The population and poultry population density of sector 2 farms in the three sub
districts surveyed can be seen in Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8.
26 | P A G E
Figure 5-7. Poultry Population Density of Sector 2 Farm in Cianjur District
Figure 5-8. Poultry Population Density of Sector 2 Farm in Three Sub Districts of Cianjur
Sector 3
In the case for sector 3 farms; the poultry population in Cilaku sub district was
relatively higher than in the other sub districts which was 484,616 birds. The lowest
number of population was found in Karangtengah sub district, i.e. 177,800 birds.
Poultry population density of sector 3 farms in Cilaku sub district was 96.1 poultry/ha
(by the total Cilaku area of 5,041.8 ha) that was higher than in Mande sub district
(53.9 poultry/ha) and Karangtengah sub district (31.4 poultry/ha).
There were two farms in Cilaku sub district that refused to be interviewed. Even
so, this condition did not affect the total number of sector 3 poultry around the sub
district since both farms had been inoperative.
The poultry population and density data of sector 3 farms in the three sub
districts surveyed can be seen in Figure 5-9 and Figure 5-10.
27 | P A G E
Figure 5-9. Total Poultry Population of Sector 3 Farms in Three Sub Districts of Cianjur
Figure 5-10. Poultry Density of Sector 3 Farms in Three Sub Districts of Cianjur
Based on the poultry type; it seems that most of the sector 3 farms in the three
sub districts surveyed chose broiler for the core business. The percentage of broiler in
the three sub districts was much higher than the layer which was 63% in Mande sub
district, 97% in Cilaku sub district, and 88% in Karangtengah sub district respectively.
The composition of poultry population of sector 3 farms in the three sub districts
can be seen in the following Figure 5-11 to Figure 5-13.
28 | P A G E
Figure 5-11. Poultry Composition of Sector 3 Farms by Poultry Type in Mande Sub District
Figure 5-12. Poultry Composition of Sector 3 Farms by Poultry Type in Cilaku Sub District
Figure 5-13. Poultry Composition of Sector 3 Farms by Poultry Type in Karangtengah Sub District
The number and poultry population density for the three sector farms (1, 2, and
3) in each sub district can be seen in Table 5-4 and Figure 5-14. The highest number of
poultry population among the three sector farms was found in Mande sub district; i.e.
834,377 birds and the lowest was in Karangtengah sub district with 218,000 birds.
29 | P A G E
While for the poultry population density of Mande and Cilaku was relatively the same;
i.e. 108.3 poultry/ha and 113.0 birds /ha respectively.
According to the geographical distribution characteristics, the above poultry
population number and density show that Cilaku and Mande sub districts were the
main poultry industry center in Cianjur district.
Table 5-4. Area, Poultry Population Number and Density in the Three Sub District of Cianjur
Population Total of Population Density per Total
per Sector (bird) Population Sector (bird/ha) Population
Sub District Area (ha) Sector 1,2 & Density
Sector Sector Sector Sector Sector Sector
3 (bird) Sector 1,2 &
1 2 3 1 2 3
3 (bird/ha)
Mande 7,707 226,377 200,000 408,000 834,377 29.4 26 52.9 108.3
Cilaku 5,041 - 85,000 484,616 569,616 - 16.9 96.1 113
Karangtengah 5,670 - 42,000 177,800 219,800 - 7.4 31.4 38.8
Figure 5-14. The Poultry Density in the Three Surveyed Sub Districts of Cianjur
2/ Bandung District
a. Geographical Condition
In general, the two surveyed sub districts in Bandung; Majalaya and Rancaekek;
were located on the same expanse with relatively low to medium elevation; i.e. 672 m
asl (see Table 5-5). Besides being used as poultry business, Majalaya Rancaekek sub
districts were also packed with communitys housing and the center for textile and
garment industries of Bandung district. Geographically, these two sub districts directly
bordered one another; while the Arjasari sub district was located more to the west and
was separated by Ciparay and Pacet sub districts. The Arjasari geographical condition
was more characterized by hilly feature with relatively higher elevation (966 m asl)
than the other two sub districts.
Table 5-5. Elevation of Three Sampled Sub Districts in Bandung District
Elevation (m asl)
Sub District
Minimum Maximum Average
Arjasari 672 1278 966
Majalaya 664 722 677
Rancaekek 661 681 667
Average 770
30 | P A G E
Figure 5-15 shows the geographical position of all components of poultry sector
that had been surveyed including farms of sector 2, 3, 4, TPA, TPnA, wet market, and
Dinas office which acted as poultry infrastructure component. Each location of such
poultry sector supporting components had been well-connected to one another by
mean of road facility. The roads varied in condition; from asphalt road, rocky road, to
dirt road; all were fit for large four-wheeled vehicle (truck) cruising that adequately
support the process of production input-output, marketing of output/yield, and Dinas
access for surveillance and service. But in some locations of sector 3 farms located
around Arjasari; there was a connecting access road which was very rocky and narrow.
This inflicted certain difficulties in the process of production input flow, marketing of
output/yield, as well as Dinas access for surveillance and service.
31 | P A G E
Figure 5-15. Geographical Distribution of Poultry Sector in Bandung District
32 | P A G E
In Arjasari sub district, there were two farms of sector 2 and 62 farms of sector 3.
In Rancaekek sub district, there was one farm of sector 1 (hatchery) and 60 farms of
sector 3. While in Majalaya sub district, there were eight farms of sector 3.
The geographical distribution of sector 3 poultry in the three sub districts
surveyed in Bandung can be seen in Figure 5-17 to Figure 5-19. Figure 5-17 indicates
the location of sector 3 poultry farms in Arjasari sub district that was relatively
distributed throughout the sub district area. This was also the case for sector 3 poultry
farms in Rancaekek sub district (see Figure 5-18). While the sector 3 farms distribution
in Majalaya sub district was more concentrated in the southern areas that bordered
with Ibun sub district (see Figure 5-19).
In Arjasari, Rancaekek, and Majalaya; the average distance of one commercial
farm to the other nearest farm estimated by farmers was 508529 m, 359593 m, and
682802 m respectively. They were technically not idealistic for farm management
and had disregarded the law of minimum distance requirement for farm management
(i.e. minimum of 1,000 meter to one another).
b. Population Number, Density, and Composition

Sector 1
In the three surveyed sub districts of Bandung district; there was no sector 1
farm found. The hatchery farm found in this area had activity in only in hatchery and
did not have its own farm with the capacity of 15,000 eggs per hatchery cycle. This
makes the population data of number, density, and composition unavailable to be
presented in this report.
Sector 2
In the survey areas, there were only two sector 2 poultry farms located in
Arjasari sub district. The poultry type ventured was layer with the total number of
population up to 120,000 birds (see Figure 5-16). The Arjasari sub district was about
5,217 ha, this makes the sector 2 poultry density to be 23 poultry/ha (see Figure 5-20).
Figure 5-16. The Sector 2 Poultry Population in Three Sub Districts of Bandung District
33 | P A G E
Figure 5-17. Geographic Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farms in Arjasari Sub District
34 | P A G E
Figure 5-18. Geographic Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farms in Majalaya Sub District
35 | P A G E
Figure 5-19. Geographic Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farms in Rancaekek Sub District
36 | P A G E
Figure 5-20. The Sector 2 Poultry Density in Three Sub Districts of Bandung District
P oultry D ens ity of S ec tor 2
50
40
Birds/Hectare 23.0
30
20
0.0 0.0
10
0
Arjasari Majalaya Rancaekek
Sector 3
In the survey area, the highest number of poultry population for sector 3 was in
Arjasari sub district; which amounted to 589,000 birds and the lowest number of
population was found in Majalaya sub district, 44,222 birds. The high number of
population in Arjasari was related to the number of operating sector 3 farms that was
actually higher than the other two surveyed sub districts. The sector 3 poultry
population density in this sub district was 112.9 poultry/ha; which was also higher than
the density number in Majalaya (17.7 poultry/ha) and Rancaekek (15.8 poultry/ha).
During the survey, there were several farms that could not be interviewed; i.e.
11 farms in Arjasari sub district and 7 farms in Rancaekek sub district. Even so, this
condition did not affect the total number of sector 3 poultry in the area since those
farms had been inoperative.
The population number and density of sector 3 farm in the three sub districts
under survey can be seen in Figure 5-21 and Figure 5-22.
Figure 5-21. Sector 3 Poultry Population in Three Sub Districts in Bandung District
37 | P A G E
Figure 5-22. Sector 3 Poultry Density in Three Sub Districts in Bandung District
P oultry D ens ity of S ec tor 3

112.90
110
100
90
Birds/Hectare 80
70
60
50
40 17.70
15.80
30
20
10
0
A rjasari Majalaya Rancaekek
According to the ventured poultry type, it indicates the sector 3 poultry

population in Arjasari sub district was dominated by broiler; i.e. 98% of total poultry
population. On the other hand, the layer type dominated in Majalaya and Rancaekek
sub districts with respectively 73% and 56% of total poultry population. Beside those
two types of poultry, Rancaekek sub district also had many farmers who ventured on
other kind of poultry intensively such as laying duck, meat duck, kampong (native)
chicken and laying arabian chicken.
The sector 3 poultry population composition data at three sub districts surveyed
can be seen in Figure 5-23 to Figure 5-25.
Figure 5-23. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Arjasari Sub District
38 | P A G E
Figure 5-24. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Majalaya Sub District
Figure 5-25. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Rancaekek Sub District
The poultry population number and density of the three sectors (1, 2, and 3) at
each surveyed sub district can be seen in
Table 5-6 and Figure 5-26.

Such a table indicates that the highest poultry population number for the three
sectors was found in Arjasari sub district; i.e. 709,000 birds with the density of
135.9 poultry/ha. While in Majalaya and Rancaekek, the poultry population was
44,222 birds and 78,319 birds respectively, with the density of 17.7 birds and 15.8
birds.
The poultry number and density in Arjasari show that this sub district had
become one of poultry industry centers for broiler around Bandung district. And
Rancaekek sub district was characterized by more of sector 3 farms with a more
diversified type of poultry.
39 | P A G E
Table 5-6. Area and Poultry Population Density at Three Sub Districts in Bandung District
Total of Total
Population Population Population Density per Population
per Sector (bird) Sector 1,2 Sector (bird/ha) Density
Sub District Area (ha)
& 3 (bird) Sector 1,2
Sector Sector Sector Sector Sector Sector &3
1 2 3 1 2 3 (bird/ha)
Arjasari 5,217 - 120,000 589,000 709,000 - 23 112.9 135.9
Majalaya 2,494 - - 44,222 44,222 - - 17.7 17.7
Rancaekek 4,947 - - 78,319 78,319 - - 15.8 15.8
Figure 5-26. Poultry Population Density at Three Sub Districts in Bandung District
Poultry Density in Bandung District

135.9
140
120
Birds/Hectare
100 Sector 1
80 Sector 2
Sector 3
60
Total
40
17.7 15.8
20
0
Arjasari Majalaya Rancaekek
C. Disease History
The cases of Avian Influenza (AI), ND, and Gumboro (IBD); within the last three
years at three sub districts of Cianjur and Bandung; can be seen on Table 5-7. For the
last three years, there had been no case of the above diseases found in the sector 1
poultry farm; both in Cianjur district as well as in Bandung district.
There was no case of AI and ND found during the last three years in poultry of
sector 2 at both districts. As for the case of Gumboro; according to the farmers; it
occurred at two farms in Cilaku sub district. These cases were only confirmed by
clinical symptoms observed by farmers.
For sector 3 poultry; there was a difference in AI case condition between the two
districts. Within the last three years, Mande sub district (of Cianjur) had only suffered
from AI at one broiler farm which was confirmed by private veterinarian; while in
Rancaekek (of Bandung) the AI cases were found in five layer farms; four of which
were confirmed by local private and dinas veterinarian and one case only by clinical
symptoms observed by farmers.
The ND disease; for the last three years; occurred in poultry farms of sector 3 at
Mande (2 farms), at Cilaku (1 farm), Rancaekek (7 farms), and Arjasari (5 farms). The
gumboro disease; which had caused rather high mortality; occurred at several farms of
sector 3 in the whole surveyed sub districts in Cianjur and Bandung; i.e. in Mande (2
farms), Karangtengah (4 farms), Cilaku (10 farms), Rancaekek (10 farms), Majalaya (4
farms), and Arjasari (18 farms).
40 | P A G E
Disease cases with symptoms similar to AI; within the last three years also
happened in two collecting points (TPnA), two slaughterhouses (TPA), and two wet
markets; all were in Majalaya sub district of Bandung.
Table 5-7. Last-Three-Year Disease History of Poultry Sector in Cianjur and Bandung
Collecting
Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Slaughterhouse Wet Market
District Sub District Point
AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD
Karangtengah - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - -
Cianjur Mande - - - - - - 1 2 2 - - - - - - - - -
Cilaku - - - - - 2 - 1 10 - - - - - - - - -
Arjasari - - - - - - - 5 18 - - - - - - - - -
Bandung Rancaekek - - - - - - 5 7 10 - - - - - - - - -
Majalaya - - - - - - - - 4 2 - - 2 - - 2 - -
Notes:
AI : Avian Influenza
ND : Newcastle Disease
IBD : Infectious Bursal Disease
The percentage of poultry sector 3 suffering from AI, ND, and IBD for the last
three years is presented in Table 5-8. The table shows that the average number of
sector 3 farms suffered from AI in the last three years around the three surveyed sub
districts of Bandung district was relatively higher than of Cianjur district; i.e. 4.5% and
2.3% respectively. The case was also the same for ND disease. On the other hand, for
IBD, the average number of sector 3 farms in Cianjur which suffered from it was 37.2%
that was higher than in Bandung district (28.6%).
Table 5-8. Percentage of AI, ND, and IBD Occurrence at Sector 3 Farm in the Last Three Years
Number of Farm AI ND IBD

Sub District
Answered Not Total No. of No. of No. of
%* %* %*
Answered Case Case Case
Cianjur District
Karangtengah 7 - 7 - - - - 4 57.1
Mande 10 - 10 1 10.0 2 20.0 2 20.0
Cilaku 26 2 28 - - 1 3.8 10 38.5
Total 43 2 45 1 2.3 3 7.0 16 37.2
Bandung District
Arjasari 51 11 62 - - 5 9.8 18 35.3
Rancaekek 53 7 60 5 9.4 7 13.2 10 18.9
Majalaya 8 - 8 - - - - 4 50.0
Total 112 18 130 5 4.5 12 10.7 32 28.6
Note: *Percentage was calculated by the number of farmer who answered the questionnaire
The disease map of AI, ND, and IBD which attacked sector 3 farms within the last
three years in areas of Cianjur and Bandung districts can be seen in Figure 5-27 and
Figure 5-28.
41 | P A G E
Table 5-9. Distribution of AI, ND, and IBD Diseases by Poultry Type at Sector Farm in The Last Three Years
AI ND IBD
No.
District Sub District Farm No. No. No.
Farm % % %
Case Case Case
Karangtengah Broiler 6 3 42.86
Layer 1 1 14.29
Total 7 4 57.14
Mande Broiler 6 1 10 1 10 2 20
Layer 3 1 10
Unknown 1
Cianjur
Total 10 1 10 2 20 2 20
Cilaku Broiler 24 1 3.57 10 35.71
Layer 1
Quail 1
Unknown 2
Total 28 1 3.57 10 35.71
Arjasari Broiler 49 5 8.06 18 29.03
Layer 2
Laying Duck 1
Unknown 10
Total 62 5 8.06 18 29.03
Rancaekek Broiler 8 1 1.67
Layer 10 3 5 4 6.67 5 8.33
Laying Duck 20
Kampong chicken 3 1 1.67 1 1.67
Bandung Arabian chicken 6 1 1.67 1 1.67
Kampong and
arabian chicken 1
Meat duck 2
Unknown 10 2 3.33 1 1.67 2 3.33
Total 60 5 8.33 7 11.67 10 16.67
Majalaya Broiler 1 1 12.5
Layer 6 3 37.5
Laying duck 1
Total 8 4 50
Total 175 6 3.43 15 8.57 48 27.43
42 | P A G E
Figure 5-27. Map of AI, ND, and IBD Disease Attacking Sector 3 Farms in the Last Three Years in Cianjur District
43 | P A G E
Figure 5-28. Map of AI, ND, and IBD Disease Attacking Sector 3 Farms in the Last Three Years in Bandung District
44 | P A G E
D. Vaccination Program
Poultry immunization against diseases is done through vaccination. The AI, ND,
and IBD vaccination program information on sector 1 farm was not available during the
survey; neither in Cianjur nor in Bandung. Two farms of sector 2 in Arjasari sub district
(Bandung district) had applied regular vaccination program to work against AI, ND, and
IBD. This makes the vaccination in the sector 2 for such diseases had been fully
covered (100%) in this sub district. Meanwhile for Cianjur district, the average
vaccination coverage in sector 2 toward AI, ND, and IBD in the three surveyed sub
districts was about 75%, 100%, and 50% respectively.
Data of vaccination program for sector 2 in Cianjur and Bandung districts against
AI, ND, and IBD can be seen in Table 5-10.
Table 5-10. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD on Sector 2 Farm in Cianjur and Bandung Districts
Number of Farm AI Vaccination ND Vaccination IBD Vaccination

Sub District
Not Number Number Number
Answered
Answered
Total % % %
of Farm of Farm of Farm
Cianjur District
Karangtengah 1 0 1 1 100.0 1 100.0 - -
Mande 1 1 2 1 100.0 1 100.0 - -
Cilaku 2 1 3 1 50.0 2 100.0 2 100.0
Total 4 2 6 3 75.0 4 100.0 2 50.0
Bandung District
Arjasari 2 0 2 2 100.0 2 100.0 2 100.0
Rancaekek 0 0 - - - - - -
Majalaya 0 0 - - - - - -
Total 0 0 2 100.0 2 100.0 2 100.0
Vaccination program for AI, ND, and IBD was also applied to most of the farms of
sector 3 around the surveyed areas. Table 5-11 indicates that the average vaccination
coverage over ND in sector 3 around the three surveyed sub districts in Cianjur was
relatively higher than in Bandung; i.e. 95.3% and 72.3% respectively. This is also the
case for IBD vaccination; the average vaccination coverage for that disease in Cianjur
(88.4%) was relatively higher than in Bandung (70.5%). As for AI, the average rata-rata
vaccination coverage in the three surveyed sub districts in Bandung district (40.2%)
was a little higher than in Cianjur district (32.6%).
Table 5-11. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD for Sector 3 Farm in Cianjur and Bandung
Number of Farm AI Vaccination ND Vaccination IBD Vaccination

Sub District
Not Number Number Number
Answered
Answered
Total % % %
of Farm of Farm of Farm
Cianjur District
Karangtengah 7 0 7 1 14.3 7 100.0 7 100.0
Mande 10 0 10 5 50.0 10 100.0 9 90.0
Cilaku 26 2 28 8 30.8 24 92.3 22 84.6
Total 43 2 45 14 32.6 41 95.3 38 88.4
Bandung District
Arjasari 51 11 68 14 27.4 46 90.2 48 94.1
Rancaekek 53 7 60 25 47.2 28 52.8 24 45.1
Majalaya 8 0 8 6 75.0 7 87.5 7 87.5
Total 112 18 130 45 40.2 81 72.3 79 70.5
45 | P A G E
Figure 5-29. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD for Sector 3 in Cianjur
46 | P A G E
Figure 5-30. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD for Sector 3 in Bandung
47 | P A G E
E. Production Input and Output Flow

1/ Sector 1 Farm
There were 2 enterprises of sector 1 in the surveyed areas; i.e. PT. Peternakan
Ayam Manggis in Mande sub district of Cianjur district which was a parent stock farm
and PT. Ciung Wanara in Rancaekek sub district of Bandung district which was a
hatchery.
a. Production Input Procurement

PT. Peternakan Ayam Manggis got its DOC from PT Hybro Indonesia; located in
Warung Kondang, Cianjur; and its feed from PT. Mega Prajasa Sentosa located at
Cikupa, Tangerang. As for vaccine, vitamin, and medicine needs they were supplied by
pharmacies like PT. Ceva, PT. Romindo, PT. SHS, PT. Swadesi, PT. Agro, and PT. Sanbe
Farma. Sources of eggs for the hatchery PT Ciung Wanara are not known.
b. Production Output Marketing

The yield of this company were broiler DOC, layer DOC, male layer DOC, rejected
egg, and spent hen. Broiler DOC and male layer was marketed to areas of Jabotabek
(Jakarta, and surrounding cities Bogor, Tangerang and Bekasi) and West Java, and layer
DOC was sold to Sulawesi, Kalimantan, Sumatera, Java, and Bali. The DOC marketing
was directly to commercial poultry farms or through poultry shops. The company
currently has regular customers; i.e. nine commercial poultry farms and six poultry
shops for its DOC product; seven commercial poultry farms and four poultry shops for
its layer DOC, and four commercial poultry farms and two poultry shops for male layer
DOC. Rejected eggs were marketed only around Cianjur district and spent hen was
sold to Jabotabek and West Java. The rejected egg consumers were bakeries,
restaurants, caterers, and some were directly sold in markets. Spent hen product was
directly fetched to eight distributors in the market.
The sector 1 marketing and poultry product volume in the surveyed areas of
Cianjur can be seen in Table 5-12.
Table 5-12. The Marketing and Poultry Product Volume of Sector 1 around Cianjur District
Customer
No. Product Marketing Area Volume
Type Total
1 DOC broiler Commercial farm 9 Jabotabek 81,600 poultry/week
Poultry shop 6 West Java
2 DOC layer Commercial farm 7 Sulawesi 39,168 poultry/week
Poultry shop 4 Kalimantan
Java
Bali
3 Male Layer DOC Commercial farm 4 Jabotabek 41,000 poultry/week
Poultry shop 2 West Java
4 Rejected egg Bakeries, restaurants, Cianjur 1,296 eggs/week
caterers, and households
5 Spent hen Distributors at market 8 Jabotabek 5,125 poultry/month
West Java
PT. Ciung Wanara hatchery farm marketed its DOC product to Tasikmalaya,
Ciamis, and Bandung. Hatchery was done in Mondays and Thursdays with the volume
48 | P A G E
production volume around 15,00030,000 poultry/hatchery cycle. It was done by 10

hatchery machine with the capacity of 15,000 eggs/machine.
The product marketing flow of sector 1 poultry farm can be seen in the following
figure.
Figure 5-31. Product Marketing Flow of Sector 1 Poultry Farm
Grand Parent Stock
Parent Stock
DOC (broiler, layer,

Rejected Egg Spent Hen
male layer)
Commercial Bakeries
Farms Poultry Restaurants Market
(sector 2 and Shop Caterers
sector 3)
End Consumers Small Traders
The map of sector 1 poultry production input and output in the surveyed areas of
Cianjur and Bandung districts can be seen in the Figure 5-32.
2/ Sector 2 Farm
In the surveyed area, there were seven sector 2 farms; five in Cianjur district and
two in Bandung district. In Cianjur, the sector 2 farms included two broiler farms and
three layer farms. As for the sector 2 farms in Bandung, they were all layer farms.

The broiler farm in Cianjur survey area obtained DOC input through self-seedling
by its mother company located in the same area or outside Cianjur district; whereas
the layer farm obtained pullet supply from areas of Jakarta and Cianjur. The layer farm
in Bandung surveyed area obtained the pullet from PT. Japfa Comfeed in Tangerang.
All broiler and layer farms in both survey area obtained the poultry feed directly
from the factory; i.e. PT. Charoen Pokphand in Tangerang, PT. Sierad Produce Tbk., and
PT. Japfa Indonesia Tbk. The vaccine need was supplied by PT. SHS, PT. CEVA, PT.
Vaccinedo, and PT. Sierad Produce Tbk. As for the vitamin and medicine needs, the
farms of Cianjur obtained them from PT SHS, PT. Romindo, PT. Ima, PT. Sanbe; while
the two farms in Bandung applied herbal medicines for medication.
49 | P A G E
Figure 5-32. Map of Sector 1 Poultry Production Input-Output Flow in Cianjur and Bandung Districts
50 | P A G E

In Cianjur district, the broiler farm marketed their live poultry to the surrounding
market, and to Bandung, Jakarta, Bogor, and Sukabumi with the average marketing
volume about 212,500 poultry/year. The consumers were poultry collectors,
agents/distributors in wet market, slaughterhouses (TPA); some directly did the
slaughtering at their own slaughterhouses and stored them into cold storage and sell
them in carcass form. The layer farms marketed their product to the surrounding
markets, Bandung, and Jakarta with the average production volume about 1,637.5
ton/year.
Layer farms in Bandung district marketed their egg product to the surrounding
market, Banjar, and Ciparay with the average production volume about 730 ton/year.
Spent hens from layer farms in Cianjur district were usually sold directly to
agents in wet markets in Jakarta and Lampung areas with the average product volume
about 35,500 poultry/cycle. The live poultry from broiler farms in Cianjur, Bandung,
Jakarta, Bogor, and Sukabumi with the average marketing rata volume about 212,500
poultry/year. The consumers were collectors, agents in wet markets, slaughterhouse
(TPA), and poultry slaughterhouse (RPA), and some directly cut them in their own
slaughterhouse and put them in cold storage and sold them in carcass form.
The flow of production marketing in sector 2 layer farms can be seen in Figure
5-33; while the Figure 5-34 shows the flow of production marketing of sector 2 broiler
farms.
Figure 5-33. Sector 2 Layer Farms Flow of Production Marketing
51 | P A G E
Figure 5-34. Sector 2 Broiler Farms Flow of Production Marketing
The map of sector 2 farm production input and output flow in Cianjur and
Bandung districts can be seen in Figure 5-35.
3/ Sector 3 Farm
There were 175 sector 3 farms throughout the surveyed areas; i.e. 45 farms in
three sub districts of Cianjur district and 130 farms in three sub districts of Bandung
district.

The sector 3 farms in the surveyed sub districts of Cianjur district consisted of
five layer farms, 39 broiler farms, and one quail farm. Most of the layer and broiler
farms got the DOC from Sukabumi district (40%) and Cianjur district (35%); while the
rest got it from Purwakarta district (7.5%), Jakarta (7.5%), Wonokoyo district of East
Java (2.5%), Bogor (2.5%), Karawang (2.5%) and Tangerang (2.5%). As for the pullet
needs; the layer farms got them from local resource (60%) and Jakarta (40%). The
quail seedling was obtained from Sukabumi district.
For the feed requirement; most of the farms directly acquired it from the factory
in Bogor, Cirebon, Wonokoyo (East Java), Serang (Banten), Bekasi, Jakarta, and
Tangerang. Only the quail farm got feed from poultry shop in Cianjur.
Most of the layer and broiler farmer in Cianjur obtained vaccine directly from PT.
Medion, PT. Mensana, PT. SHS, PT. Satwa Java Jaya, PT. HIPFA, and PT. Vaccinedo. The
vitamin and medicine were also obtained directly from pharmacies like PT. Medion, PT.
Mensana, PT. SHS, PT. Swadesi, PT. Sanbe, PT. Romindo, PT. Multi Satwa Medika, PT.
Radivit, PT. Avindo, PT. Agro Makmur Sentosa, PT. Satwa Java Jaya, PT. Male, and
Dugok RI Chung Chen Nam, Korea. All the mentioned companies were located in
Jakarta, Bogor, Tangerang, and Bandung. There was only one broiler farm and one
quail farm that obtained the medication needs through local poultry shop.
52 | P A G E
Figure 5-35. Map of Sector 2 Farm Production Input and Output Flow in Cianjur and Bandung Districts
53 | P A G E
The sector 3 farm type in the surveyed sub districts of Bandung district was more
diversified; i.e. besides broiler farms (55%) and layer farms (16%), there were also
laying duck farms (18%), meat duck farms (2%), kampong chicken farm (3%), and laying
arabian chicken farm (6%).
In Arjasari sub district, the broiler farmers procured DOC from Bandung,
Purwakarta, Subang, Jakarta, Tangerang, Cianjur, Bogor, Sukabumi, and Wonokoyo
(Malang, East Java). Layer farmers obtained pullet from Purwakarta, and laying duck
farmers purchased pullet from farmers around local sub district.
In Majalaya sub district, broiler farmers secured their DOC from areas of Subang.
Layer farmers and laying duck farmers had their pullet from the local core farmers and
other farmers.
In Rancaekek, the types of poultry were even more diversified than the other
two sub districts. Besides broiler and layer, farmers in the area also ventured on laying
arabian chicken, kampong chicken, laying duck, and meat duck. Laying arabian chicken
(of Hyland type) was obtained from Kediri (East Java) and Garut. Kampong chicken
(super type) farmers produced their own DOC. Laying duck farmers got their DOC
from farmers of other sub district in Bandung district; i.e. from Sukamanah, Majalaya,
Lembang, and from Tasikmalaya district. Meat duck farmers were supplied with DOC
from Cianjur and Magelang (Central Java). As for broiler farmers, they obtained DOC
from Sukabumi and Bandung; and layer farmers got their pullet from Tangerang,
Serang, and Bandung.
Self-supporting broiler and layer farmers got their feed from feed factories in
Bogor, Cirebon, Wonokoyo (East Java), Serang (Banten), Bekasi, Jakarta and Tangerang
or from poultry shop around Bandung district. On the other hand, plasma farmers
obtained feed from the core farmer in Bandung, Tangerang, and Serang. As for laying
arabian chicken, the feed was obtained from poultry shop located in Garut and
Sumedang. Kampong chicken farmers got the feed from poultry shops in Bandung and
feed factories in Cianjur. The laying duck farmers obtained the feed (dedak) from the
local paddy milling factory.
For the vaccine needs, the self-supporting layer and broiler farmers directly
fetched them from pharmacies like PT. Medion, PT. Mensana, PT. SHS, and PT.
Vaccinedo, or from the poultry shop in Bandung area. The laying arabian chicken
farmers had their vaccine fulfilled from the distributor of PT. Medion and local Dinas
Peternakan. Kampong chicken farmers obtained the vaccine from Dinas Peternakan
and agent in Cianjur; while laying and meat duck farmers did not apply vaccination to
their flock.
The vitamins and medicines for self-supporting layer and broiler farmers were
generally supplied by pharmacies like PT. Medion, PT. Mensana, PT. SHS, PT. Sanbe, PT.
Romindo, PT. APE Bandung, PT. Biotek Indonesia, PT. Agrinusa Unggul Jaya, PT.
Univetama Dinamika, and PT. Intravet. These companies were located in Jakarta,
Bogor, Tangerang, Bekasi, and Bandung. Furthermore, besides directly from those
companies, farmers also obtained them from poultry shops and agents around
Bandung. The laying arabian chicken farmers got the vitamins and medicines from the
distributor of PT. Medion and local Dinas Peternakan; while kampong chicken farmers
had them from the Dinas Peternakan and agents in Cianjur and Tasikmalaya. Most
54 | P A G E
duck farmers did not supply their flock with vitamins and medicines and some farmers
who used vitamins and medicines obtained them from the local poultry shops.

In the three surveyed sub districts of Cianjur district, broiler farmers marketed
their live poultry to collectors, agents in wet market, poultry slaughterhouse (TPA and
RPA). There were also farmers who sold poultry in carcass form by doing the
slaughtering in their own slaughterhouse. The marketing target location included
areas of Cianjur, Bandung, Jakarta, Sukabumi, and Bogor. The average production
volume per year was up to 163,000 poultry per farmer in Mande sub district; 46,100
poultry per farmer in Karangtengah sub district; and 42,409 poultry per farmer in
Cilaku sub district.
The layer farmers marketed their egg yield to wet markets and restaurants in
Cianjur and Jakarta with the average production volume per year about 489,750 ton
per farmer in Mande sub district; 2,372.5 ton per farmer in Karangtengah sub district;
and 6,043.35 ton per farmer in Cilaku sub district. The spent hens from the farm were
sold to agents or to traders in wet market around Cianjur, Jakarta, Bogor, and
Sukabumi with the average selling volume per year of 20,000 poultry per farmer in
Mande sub district and 2,000 poultry per farmer in Karangtengah sub district. While
the male layer poultry from the layer farms in Mande sub district were sold to RPA
around Cianjur with the average selling volume of 170 poultry per farmer per year.
In the surveyed areas of Bandung district, the self-supporting broiler farmers sold
their live poultry to collectors, agents in wet market, and slaughterhouses (TPA and
RPA), while the plasma farmers sold them to core farmers located in Bandung,
Tangerang, and Serang. The target marketing sites included Bandung, Jakarta,
Majalengka, Cianjur, Garut and Depok with the average production volume per year
about 64,790 poultry per farmer in Arjasari sub district; 262,800 poultry per farmer in
Majalaya sub district; and 4,333 poultry per farmer Rancaekek sub district.
The layer farms marketed their egg yield to wet markets and restaurants around
the local area, to Sumedang, and to Majalengka with the average production volume
per year about 50,000 ton per farmer in Arjasari sub district; 46.7 ton per farmer in
Majalaya sub district; and 55.96 ton per farmer in Rancaekek sub district. The spent
hens from the farms were sold to agents and traders in wet market around areas of
Bandung, Cianjur, Garut, and Tasikmalaya with the average selling volume per year
about 7,900 poultry per farmer in Majalaya sub district and 690 poultry per farmer in
Rancaekek sub district. The male layer poultry were sold to agents or trader in wet
market around Bandung with the average selling volume per year about 1,000 poultry
per farmer in Majalaya sub district and 325 poultry per farmer in Rancaekek sub
district.
The marketing flow of layer and broiler in sector 3 farms was the same with the
one in sector 2 farms; see the above Figure 5-33 and Figure 5-34.
The farmers of laying arabian and kampong chicken in Rancaekek sub district
sold their live poultry (meat and spent laying poultry) to collectors in wet market
around Bandung with the average selling volume per year about 22,500 meat arabian
chicken, 50 spent arabian hen, 51,120 meat super kampong chicken, 33 spent
55 | P A G E
kampong hens, and 3,180 spent laying ducks. The egg yield from laying arabian
chicken farms was sold to Bandung areas with the average selling volume of 6.9 ton
per farm per year. While duck eggs were sold to areas of Bandung and Majalengka
with the average selling volume about 4 ton per farm per year.
The flow of arabian kampong chicken yield marketing can be seen in the
following Figure 5-36.
Figure 5-36. Flow of Sector 3 Arabian and Kampong Chicken Farm Yield Marketing
The flow of sector 3 duck farm yield marketing can be seen in the following
Figure 5-37.
Figure 5-37. Flow of Sector 3 Duck Farm Yield Marketing
The map of production input and output flow of the sector 3 farms around the
surveyed area of Cianjur and Bandung districts can be seen in the following Figure 5-38
and Figure 5-39.
56 | P A G E
Figure 5-38. Map of Production Input and Output Flow of Sector 3 Farms in Cianjur District
57 | P A G E
Figure 5-39. Map of Production Input and Output Flow of Sector 3 Farms in Bandung District
58 | P A G E
4/ Wet market, Slaughterhouse, and Poultry Collector

In the surveyed areas of Bandung district, there were four wet markets; they
were Rancaekek Market and Wahana Karya Market in Rancaekek sub district and Pasar
Baru Market and Pasar Stasiun Market in Majalaya sub district. In Cianjur district there
were two wet markets; they were Terminal Lama Market and Mardiyuana Market.
In the wet market of Rancaekek sub district, there was no live poultry trader
since the application of the local governments law on banning live poultry trading in
wet markets. Traders in wet market of Majalaya sub district, besides selling live
poultry they also provided the slaughtering service. Therefore, the poultry buying
from the collecting site, the slaughtering process, and the selling in carcass form were
done at relatively the same spot (market). The types of poultry sold in the market
were kampong chicken, duck, and broiler.
Kampong chicken and duck poultry in the wet market of Majalaya sub district
were collected from Bandung (Majalaya, Ibun, and Cibeureum sub districts), Garut,
and Tasikmalaya districts. The selling volume of kampong chicken per day in average
was about 37 poultry per trader and duck was 30 poultry per trader. Broiler chicken
were obtained from farms around Majalaya sub district with the average daily selling
volume about 80 poultry per trader. The consumers of this market were restaurants,
caterers, retail/small eatery, processed food trader (chicken porridge, chicken noodle,
etc.), and households around Majalaya area.
There were also poultry collector traders in Majalaya sub district wet market,
selling broiler or kampong chicken. These broiler collector obtained live poultry from
the surrounding farms or poultry shop in Majalaya and Lampegan sub districts (of
Bandung district) with the range of selling volume per trader about 100 kg 800 kg per
day. The consumers were carcass traders in the wet market of Majalaya sub district,
restaurants, caterers, and slaughterhouse (TPA) venturers. These kampong chicken
collectors got the poultry from the community around Majalaya sub district. The
consumers of these traders were retail traders, slaughterhouse (TPA) venturers, and
households with the range of selling volume about 50 150 poultry per day per trader.
The slaughterhouse (TPA) companies existed in Rancaekek sub district were
generally small-scale industries (household) and they directly marketed their
commodity to Rancaekek and Pasar Wahana Karya markets. The slaughterhouse
obtained broiler from broiler farm or poultry shop around Bandung district (sub
districts of Majalaya, Banjar, Ciparay, Lembang, and Rancaekek), and Cianjur and
Tasikmalaya districts. The consumers of these slaughterhouse (TPA) were restaurants,
caterers, retail traders/small eateries, processed food traders (chicken porridge,
chicken noodle, etc.), and households around Rancaekek areas with the selling volume
ranging from 80 to 1,000 poultry per day per trader.
The type of live poultry sold in wet markets in the surveyed areas of Cianjur
district were kampong chicken, duck, muscovy duck and spent hens. Those poultry
were directly obtained by the traders from farmers around local areas such as from
Cibalagung, Mande, Cibeber, Cianjur Selatan, Warung Kondang, and Cilaku sub
districts. Besides the mentioned areas, some traders also got the merchandise from
Sukabumi district. The consumers of this market were households, restaurants, and
59 | P A G E
caterers from areas around the market with the average selling volume of kampong
chicken per day about 16 poultry per trader, duck about 17 poultry per trader,
muscovy duck about 13 poultry per trader, and spent hens 20 poultry per trader.
The collector traders in the surveyed areas were broiler traders. Live poultry was
obtained from broiler farms around Cianjur and Sukabumi districts with the average
buying volume about 880 poultry/day/trader. In general, those collector traders own
TPA that they also offered slaughtering service and sold in carcass form. Consumers of
these traders were restaurants, caterers, other traders and TPA venturers in the
surrounding areas with the average carcass selling volume about 463
poultry/day/trader and live poultry about rata 760 poultry/day/trader.
F. Sector 4 Farm Profile

1/ Farm Location
The information of sector 4 farmers in the three sub districts of Cianjur and
Bandung districts was collected from each of four sampled village for every sub
districts.
The data of the sampled four villages for each sub district and the number of
farmer respondents for every village can be seen in Table 5-13. The map of farm
location distribution on the four sampled villages sample at each surveyed sub district
can be seen in Figure 5-40 to Figure 5-45.
These maps show that most of the distribution of sector 4 farms at each point of
sampling location (RW) in every village was equally dispersed, in both surveyed Cianjur
and Bandung district. This sector 4 distribution condition at least shows us about the
general condition that applied at village level and local sub districts.
The poultry in sector 4 are dispersed throughout the whole village and this
makes providing animal health services, movement control and implementing
biosecurity measures very difficult.
Table 5-13. Sampled Villages and number of Respondent Per Village in Surveyed Sub District
Number of Sampling Number of
Sub District Sampled Village
Point (RW) Respondent
Karangtengah (1) Maleber 4 115
(2) Subandar 4 94
(3) Bojong 4 109
(4) Sukamanah 4 92
Mande (1) Bobojong 4 128
(2) Cikidang Bayabang 4 120
(3) Jamali 4 133
(4) Kademangan 4 135
Cilaku (1) Sirnagalih 4 139
(2) Rahong 4 123
(3) Ciharahas 4 159
(4) Sukasari 4 118
Total 48 1,465
Arjasari (1) Pinggir sari 4 57
(2) Rancakole 4 106
(3) Arjasari 4 45
(4) Patrol Sari 4 61
Majalaya (1) Bojong Loa 4 46
(2) Tegal Sumedang 4 63
(3) Haur Pugur 4 51
60 | P A G E
Number of Sampling Number of

Sub District Sampled Village
Point (RW) Respondent
(4) Jelegong 4 58
Rancaekek (1) Majasetra 4 57
(2) Neglasari 4 47
(3) Majalaya 4 27
(4) Wangi Sagara 4 56
Total 48 674
2/ Farm Characteristics
Poultry farming system in sector 4 farms were divided into four ways of poultry
keeping (1) poultry were kept in closed cages; (2) poultry were kept in cages with
fenced free-ranging area; (3) poultry were kept in fenced backyards of farmers house;
(4) poultry were allowed to roam freely (free-ranging) in backyards and to other areas
(refer to Table 5-14).
In the three sub districts that were surveyed in Cianjur District, most of the
poultry farming was by way of (1) and (2) farming system, 73.6 % in Cilaku sub district,
65.7% in Mande sub district and 63% in Karangtengah sub district. Whereas in
Bandung District, poultry farming by implementing those 2 ways were done in 53% of
the farms in Arjasari sub district, 38.4% in Rancaekek sub district and 36.6% in
Majalaya sub district. However, the number of farmer that kept their poultry freely in
house backyard (way no. 4) were still considered relatively high, especially in Arjasari
sub district (41.2%), Majalaya sub district (39.0%) and Karangtengah sub district
(32.5%).
In general, the farmers considered sector 4 poultry farming as side job, on which the
farmers dependency as a main income is less than 30% of their total living cost. In the
three sub districts surveyed in Cianjur District 80.9% sector 4 farms were categorized as
side job, whereas in three sub districts surveyed in Bandung District were 89.1%
(refer to Note: The data were based on the number of respondent who actually answered to the asked question
Table 5-15).
This side job paradigm in poultry farming was surely related to the low number
of poultry population in their farms. This condition is indicated by the average number
of sector 4 poultry kept per family in sampled village or in the surveyed sub districts of
both districts (refer to Table 5-17).
The number and type of poultry kept by sector 4 farmers at sampled village in
each surveyed sub district can be seen in detail at Table 5-16.
Biosecurity aspects implemented in most of the sector 4 farms were relatively
poor, in the three sub districts in Cianjur District as well as Bandung District (refer to
Table 5-17).
61 | P A G E
Figure 5-40. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Karangtengah of Cianjur District
62 | P A G E
Figure 5-41. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Cilaku of Cianjur District
63 | P A G E
Figure 5-42. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Mande of Cianjur District
64 | P A G E
Figure 5-43. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Arjasari of Bandung District
65 | P A G E
Figure 5-44. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Rancaekek of Bandung District
66 | P A G E
Figure 5-45. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Majalaya of Bandung District
67 | P A G E
Table 5-14. Sector 4 Poultry Farming System in Cianjur District and Bandung District
Cianjur District Bandung District
Karangtengah Sub Arjasari Rancaekek Majalaya
Farming System Cilaku Sub district Mande Sub district
district Sub district Sub district Sub district
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
- In closed cages 19 26.4 14 18.2 16 21.9 8 15.7 5 12.8 5 12.2
- In cages with free-ranging area completed
34 47.2 36 46.8 32 43.8 19 37.3 10 25.6 10 24.4
with fence
- In fenced backyard of farmers house 2 2.8 2 2.6 3 4.1 3 5.9 12 30.8 10 24.4
- Freely roams (free-ranging) in the backyard
17 23.6 25 32.5 22 30.1 21 41.2 12 30.0 16 39.0
and other areas outside the house
TOTAL 72 100.0 77 100.0 73 100.0 51 100.0 39 100.0 41 100.0
Note: The data were based on the number of respondent who actually answered to the asked question
Table 5-15. Purpose of Sector 4 Poultry Farming in Cianjur District and Bandung District
Karangtengah Sub Arjasari Rancaekek Majalaya
Main Purpose of Farming Cilaku Sub district Mande Sub district
district Sub district Sub district Sub district
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
- Main job 17 15.5 3 4.7 1 1.3 5 12.5 3 9.7 2 5.1
- Side job 84 76.4 58 90.6 71 91.0 34 85.0 23 74.2 34 87.2
- Self consumption 7 6.4 3 4.7 6 7.7 1 2.5 1 3.2 3 7.7
- Hobby 2 1.8 - - - - - - 4 12.9 - -
TOTAL 110 100.0 64 100.0 78 100.0 40 100.0 31 100.0 39 100.0
Note: The data were based on the number of respondent who actually answered to the asked question
68 | P A G E
Table 5-16. Households with poultry and types of poultry kept by Sector 4 Farmer at Sampled Villages
Number of Owner
Kampong
District Sub District Sampled Village Kampong Total
Chicken Duck Goose Muscovy Broiler Layer Chicken & Other
Bird Only Chicken &
Only Only Only Duck Only Only Only Muscovy Duck Combination
Duck Only
Only
Bandung Majalaya Majasentra 23 6 2 7 5 0 0 2 1 8 54
Neglasari 24 1 0 3 2 0 0 1 7 8 46
Majalaya 12 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 4 27
Wangisagara 27 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 3 16 55
Rancaekek Bojongloa 20 1 0 7 4 0 0 0 5 10 47
Tegal Sumedang 25 0 0 4 16 0 0 1 11 4 61
Haur Rugur 20 2 0 3 9 0 0 0 5 11 50
Jelegong 18 1 1 19 5 0 0 0 5 9 58
Arjasari Pinggirsari 45 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 6 57
Rancakole 70 2 0 2 3 0 0 1 12 9 99
Arjasari 25 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 9 42
Patrolsari 44 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 10 59
Total Bandung 353 14 4 62 49 1 1 9 58 104 655
Cianjur Cilaku Sirnagalih 78 10 2 13 5 0 0 2 13 19 142
Pasir Leutik 9 2 0 3 13 0 0 1 10 4 42
Rahong 75 2 0 3 14 0 0 3 12 19 128
Ciharashas 59 0 0 0 25 0 0 2 25 6 117
Sukasari 85 0 1 5 12 0 0 1 8 6 118
Karangtengah Maleber 73 7 12 7 4 0 0 5 1 4 113
Sabandar 55 5 0 12 0 0 4 0 0 18 94
Bojong 64 1 0 11 2 0 1 9 5 18 111
Sukamanah 71 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 9 9 94
Mande Bobojong 76 3 1 2 11 1 0 8 11 16 129
Cikidang 67 4 1 4 16 0 0 5 9 13 119
Jamali 74 1 0 2 3 0 0 4 10 18 112
Kademangan 75 5 1 7 19 1 0 3 8 18 137
Total Cianjur 861 41 18 70 125 2 5 45 121 168 1456
Overall total 1214 55 22 132 174 3 6 54 179 272 2111
69 | P A G E
3/ Biosecurity Condition
Observations were done to determine biosecurity level in sector 4 farms in the
three surveyed sub districts in each district (Cilaku, Karangtengah and Mande sub
districts in Cianjur District and Majalaya, Arjasari and Rancaekek sub districts in
Bandung District). The aspects observed were farming system, sanitation (cage,
backyard, and feed and drink container), handling of poultry feces, movement control
in the farm area, handling of sick/dead poultry and quarantine measures done in each
farm.
Observation on those six aspects indicated that the biosecurity level in most of
the sector 4 farms in the six surveyed sub districts were categorized as relatively
poor, with the highest percentage in Karangtengah sub district (83.1%) and the
lowest in Arjasari sub district (60.9%). In contrary, farms that were categorized as
medium to good were relatively high in Arjasari sub district (39.1%) and lowest in
Karangtengah sub district (16.9%)
Biosecurity is the first line of defense to diseases (Cardona 2005). If farmer
implements good biosecurity, it will keep microbes away from the poultry and the
poultry away from microbes (Jeffrey 2006). The relatively poor biosecurity condition in
both study areas may act as a trigger for the entry and spread of infectious agents.
Farm with poor biosecurity condition may promote AI virus infection in poultry (FAO
2005), and may cause the spread of H5N1 virus to other farms (Songserm et al. 2006).
Poultry kept in farms with poor biosecurity level has 5x higher risk of being exposed to
AI virus compared to poultry in farms with good biosecurity condition (Sinarjaya,
2007).
Detail description of biosecurity condition in sector 4 poultry farms in Cianjur
District and Bandung District is shown in Table 5-17.
Table 5-17. Condition of Biosecurity Level in Sector 4 Poultry Farms in Cianjur District and Bandung District
Category of Biosecurity Number of
District Sub district %
Level Respondent
Good 2 2.9
Medium 12 17.7
Cilaku
Poor 54 79.4
Total 68 100.0
Good 1 1.3
Medium 12 15.6
Cianjur Karangtengah
Poor 64 83.1
Total 77 100.0
Good 0 0.0
Medium 16 21.9
Mande
Poor 57 78.1
Total 73 100.0
Bandung Good 0 0.0

Medium 8 21.0
Majalaya
Poor 30 79.0
Total 38 100.0
Good 8 17.4
Medium 10 21.7
Arjasari
Poor 28 60.9
Total 46 100.0
70 | P A G E
Category of Biosecurity Number of

District Sub district %
Level Respondent
Good 2 5.3
Medium 9 23.7
Rancaekek
Poor 27 71.0
Total 38 100.0
4/ Estimation of Population
Estimation of poultry population in sector 4 farms in the study areas were done
by three approach methods, (1) determining average number of poultry owned by
each farmer (head of family) in sampled village level and sub district level, (2)
determining proportion of farmer (head of family) who owns poultry in each sub
district, and (3) determining the number of farmer (head of family) in each sub district
(secondary data).
The result from surveys done in three sub districts in Cianjur District and
Bandung District revealed that the average numbers of poultry owned by each farmer
were relatively similar, with the highest rate in Mande Sub district (11 poultry/farmer)
and the lowest in Cilaku Sub district (9.2 poultry/farmer). While in sampled village
level, the average number of poultry owned by each farmer was highest in Pasir Leutik
village (Cilaku sub district) which was 15.1 poultry/farmer and the lowest were in
Sukasari village (Cilaku sub district) and Subandar village (Karang Tengah sub district)
which was 7.9 poultry/farmer.
The detailed data of sector 4 poultry ownership per farmer in sampled village
level and sub district level is shown in Table 5-18.
Table 5-18. Average Number of Poultry Owned by Each Farmer in Sampled Villages and Surveyed Sub
Districts
Average number of poultry owned per farmer
Sub district/District Name of Sampled Village Sampled village (number of Sub district level (number of
poultry) poultry)
Karangtengah/Cianjur (1) Maleber 10.7
(2) Subandar 7.9
10.2
(3) Bojong 12.2
(4) Sukamanah 9.4
Mande/Cianjur (1) Bobojong 8.5
(2) Cikidang Bayabang 8.2
11
(3) Jamali 13.6
(4) Kademangan 13.7
Cilaku/Cianjur (1) Sirnagalih 8.4
(2) Rahong 9.3
(3) Ciharashas 9.4 9.2
(4) Sukasari 7.9
(5) Pasir Leutik 15.1
Arjasari/Bandung (1) Pinggis Sari 8.5
(2) Rancakole 10.9
9.8
(3) Arjasari 8.1
(4) Patrolsari 10.2
Rancaekek/Bandung (1) Bojongloa 12.1
(2) Tegal Sumedang 9.2
10.6
(3) Haur Pugur 9.1
(4) Jelegong 11.4
Majalaya/Bandung (1) Maja Setra 8.9 9.6
(2) Neglasari 11.6
(3) Majalaya 8.8
71 | P A G E
Average number of poultry owned per farmer

(4) Wangi Sagara 8.9
The highest proportion of farmer (head of family) who owned sector 4 poultry
from the 6 sub districts surveyed was in Arjasari Sub district (0.61) and the lowest was
in Karangtengah Sub district (0.2). In detail, the proportion of farmer who owns sector
4 poultry is shown in Table 5-19.
Table 5-19. Proportion of Farmer Owning Sector 4 Poultry in Cianjur District and Bandung District
Proportion
No. of
District Sub District Village No. Poultry Owner Sampled Sampled Sub
Respondent
Village District
Cianjur Cilaku Sirnagalih 338 142 0.42
Rahong 298 128 0.43
Ciharashas 324 120 0.37
0.41
Pasir Leutik (Ciharashas) 114 42 0.37
Sukasari 264 119 0.45
Total 1,338 551
Karangtengah Maleber 595 115 0.19
Sabandar 448 94 0.21
Bojong 488 108 0.22 0.20
Sukamanah 479 92 0.19
Total 2,010 409
Mande Bobojong 277 128 0.46
Cikidang 303 120 0.40
Jamali 267 133 0.50 0.44
Kademangan 331 135 0.41
Total 1,178 516
Bandung Arjasari 150 92 0.61 0.61
Rancaekek 150 51 0.34 0.34
Majalaya 150 78 0.52 0.52
The estimation of sector 4 poultry population in each sub district can be

determined based on the average number of poultry owned per farmer or per family,
proportion of farmer who owns poultry and the number of family per sub district.
The survey result shows that the highest poultry population of sector 4 farm in
the three surveyed sub districts of Cianjur was found in Cilaku Sub districts with 87,100
birds and the lowest was in Karangtengah Sub district with 68,050 birds. As for the
sampled village, the highest number of poultry population was found in Jamali Village
with 17,775 birds and the lowest was in Sukamanah Village with 3,309 birds.
For the three sub districts in Bandung, the highest sector 4 poultry population
was found in Majalaya sub district; i.e. 183,753 birds. The other two sub districts had
128,759 birds (Arjasari sub district) and 136,298 birds (Rancaekek sub district). In the
sampled village level, two villages in Rancaekek sub district have the highest and the
lowest number of poultry population, Bojong Loa Village (15,259) and Tegal Sumedang
Village (3,166) respectively.
In detail, the data of sector 4 poultry population in Cianjur district and Bandung
district is shown in Table 5-20 and Table 5-21.
72 | P A G E
Table 5-20. Estimation of Sector 4 Poultry Population in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Cianjur District
Average Estimation of
Number of number of Proportion of Population
Sub district Village family/ poultry Family that owns (Number of
village owned per Poultry Poultry/
family Village)
*)
1. Sukamanah 1,853 9.4 0.19 3,309
2. Cikarang 2,135 10.2 0.20 4,355
3. Sukamantri 1,317 10.2 0.20 2,687
4. Sukasarana 1,082 10.2 0.20 2,207
5. Sukasari 1,664 10.2 0.20 3,395
*)
6. Bojong 4,115 12.2 0.22 11,045
7. Bbk. Caringin 1,698 10.2 0.20 3,464
*)
8. Subandar 3,011 7.9 0.21 4,995
Karangtengah 9. Sindangsari 2,360 10.2 0.20 4,814
10. Sukataris 2,194 10.2 0.20 4,476
11. Sidanglaka 1,526 10.2 0.20 3,113
12. Langensari 1,587 10.2 0.20 3,237
13. Hegarmanah 3,042 10.2 0.20 6,206
14. Sukajadi 1,386 10.2 0.20 2,827
15. Sukamulya 1,204 10.2 0.20 2,456
*)
16. Maleber 2,687 10.7 0.19 5,463
Total 32,861 68,050
*)
1. Kademangan 2,134 13.7 0.41 11,987
*)
2. Bobojong 3,829 8.5 0.46 14,971
*)
3. Cikidang Bayabang 1,688 8.2 0.40 5,537
4. Mande 946 11 0.44 4,579
5. Mulyasari 1,052 11 0.44 5,092
*)
6. Jamali 2,614 13.6 0.50 17,775
Mande 7. Ciandan 1,430 11 0.44 6,921
8. Sukamanah 1,035 11 0.44 5,009
9. Leuwikoja 472 11 0.44 2,284
10. Mekarjaya 894 11 0.44 4,327
11. Kutawaringin 883 11 0.44 4,274
12. Murnisari 820 11 0.44 3,969
Total 17,797 86,725
*)
1. Sukasari 2,741 7.9 0.45 9,744
*)
2. Sirnagalih 3,694 8.4 0.42 13,032
3. Sukakerta 2,088 9.2 0.41 7,876
4. Cibinonghilir 1,658 9.2 0.41 6,254
*)
5. Rahong 1,889 9.3 0.43 7,554
6. Munjul 1,636 9.2 0.41 6,171
Cilaku
7. Rancagoong 1,801 9.2 0.41 6,793
8. Sindangsari 2,067 9.2 0.41 7,797
*)
9. Ciharahas 2,115 9.4 0.37 7,356
10. Mulyasari 1,612 9.2 0.41 6,080
11. Pasir Leutik*) 1,511 15.1 0.37 8,442
Total 22,812 87,100
Note : Estimation of Population = Number of family/Village x Average Number of Poultry Owned/family x Proportion of Family
that owns poultry
*= Sampled Village
73 | P A G E
Table 5-21. Estimation of Sector 4 Poultry Population in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Bandung District
Average Proportion Estimation of
Number of
number of of Family Population
Sub district Village family/
poultry owned that owns (Number of
village
per family Poultry Poultry/ Village)
1. Arjasari*) 2,276 8.1 11,246
2. Pinggir Sari*) 2,181 8.5 11,308
3. Lebak Wangi 2,653 9.8 15,860
4. Batu Karut 2,474 9.8 14,790
5. Mangunjaya 1,681 9.8 10,049
6. Warga Luyu 1,894 9.8 11,322
Arjasari 0.61
7. Baros 2,108 9.8 12,602
8. Mekar Jaya 1,384 9.8 8,274
9. Patrol Sari*) 1,851 10.2 11,517
10. Rancakole*) 2,110 10.9 14,029
11. Andol Mekar 1,315 9.8 7,861
Total 21,927 128,857
1. Sukamanah 1,753 10.6 6,318
2. Tegal Sumedang*) 1,012 9.2 3,166
3. Rancaekek Kulon 3,090 10.6 11,136
4. Rancaekek Wetan 9,224 10.6 33,243
5. Bojong Loa*) 4,234 10.6 15,259
6. Jelegong*) 3,534 10.6 12,737
7. Suka Mulya 2,405 10.6 8,668
Rancaekek 0.34
8. Linggar 2,448 10.6 8,823
9. Cangkuang 2,795 10.6 10,073
10. Haur Pugur*) 2,224 9.1 6,881
11. Nanjung Mekar 2,583 10.6 9,309
12. Bojong Salam 1,579 10.6 5,691
13. Sangiang 1,386 10.6 4,995
Total 38,267 136,298
1. Biru 4,266 9.6 21,296
2. Bojong 3,722 9.6 18,580
3. Pada Mulya 3,427 9.6 17,108
4. Pada Ulun 3,850 9.6 19,219
5. Majalaya*) 2,916 8.8 13,344
6. Maja Setra*) 2,320 8.9 10,737
Majalaya 0.52
7. Maja Kerta 2,744 9.6 13,698
8. Neglasari*) 2,193 11.6 13,228
9. Sukamaju 5,258 9.6 26,248
10. Sukamukti 3,194 9.6 15,944
11. Wangi Sagara*) 3,101 8.9 14,351
Total 36,991 183,753
Note: Estimation of Population = Number of family/Village x Average Number of Poultry Owned/family x Proportion of Family that
owns poultry
*= Sampled Village
5/ Population Density
Density of sector 4 poultry population per ha in an area is strongly influenced by
the number of poultry population and the size of the area.
Table 5-22 shows the poultry population density for the three surveyed sub
districts in Cianjur; Karangtengah was 12..0 poultry/ha, Cilaku was 17.3 poultry/ha, and
Mande was 11.3 poultry/ha. As for the sampled village, the highest density was found
in Pasir Leutik village with 57.5 poultry/ha and the lowest was in Sukamanah village
with 5.5 poultry/ha.
In Bandung District, the highest number of poultry population density was in
Majalaya Sub district which was 74 poultry/ha. The sector 4 poultry population
densities in the other two sub districts were relatively similar, 25 poultry/ha in Arjasari
Sub district and 28 poultry/ha in Rancaekek Sub district (see Table 5-23).
74 | P A G E
Table 5-22. Sector 4 Poultry Population Density in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Cianjur District
Estimated Population Population Density
Sub district Village Area (Ha) (Number of (Number of
Poultry/Village) Poultry/Ha)
*)
1. Sukamanah 603.6 3,309 5.5
2. Cikarang 251.8 4,355 17.3
3. Sukamantri 202.0 2,687 13.3
4. Sukasarana 266.2 2,207 8.3
5. Sukasari 295.8 3,395 11.5
*)
6. Bojong 568.2 11,045 19.4
7. Bbk. Caringin 584.5 3,464 5.9
*)
8. Subandar 478.4 4,995 10.4
Karangtengah 9. Sindangsari 388.3 4,814 12.4
10. Sukataris 299.5 4,476 14.9
11. Sidanglaka 335.9 3,113 9.3
12. Langensari 330.1 3,237 9.8
13. Hegarmanah 370.1 6,206 16.8
14. Sukajadi 301.4 2,827 9.4
15. Sukamulya 159.0 2,456 15.4
*)
16. Maleber 235.7 5,463 23.0
Total 5,670.6 68,050 12.0
*)
1. Kademangan 432.5 11,987 27.7
*)
2. Bobojong 925.6 14,971 16.2
*)
3. Cikidang Bayabang 565.2 5,537 9.8
4. Mande 257.6 4,579 17.8
5. Mulyasari 451.4 5,092 11.3
*)
6. Jamali 777.0 17,775 22.9
Mande 7. Ciandan 757.2 6,921 9.1
8. Sukamanah 868.9 5,009 5.8
9. Leuwikoja --- 2,284 ---
10. Mekarjaya 1,388.4 4,327 3.1
11. Kutawaringin 724.1 4,274 5.9
12. Murnisari 559.2 3,969 7.1
Total 7,707.2 86,725 11.3
*)
1. Sukasari 947.5 9,744 10.3
*)
2. Sirnagalih 539.6 13,032 24.2
3. Sukakerta 737.9 7,876 10.7
4. Cibinonghilir 121.4 6,254 51.5
*)
5. Rahong 345.2 7,554 21.9
6. Munjul 294.1 6,171 21.0
Cilaku
7. Rancagoong 335.7 6,793 20.2
8. Sindangsari 681.8 7,797 11.4
*)
9. Ciharahas 334.6 7,356 22.0
10. Mulyasari 557.2 6,080 10.9
11. Pasir Leutik*) 146.7 8,442 57.5
Total 5,041.8 87,100 17.3
Note *) = Sampled Village
75 | P A G E
Table 5-23. Sector 4 Poultry Population Density in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Bandung District
Estimated
Population Density
Population
Sub district Village Area (hectare) (Number of
(Number of
Poultry/ha)
Poultry/Village)
1. Arjasari 745.2 11,246 15
2. Pinggir Sari 1,599.0 11,308 7
3. Lebak Wangi 412.3 15,860 38
4. Batu Karut 217.0 14,790 68
5. Mangunjaya 586.7 10,049 17
6. Warga Luyu 518.7 11,322 22
Arjasari
7. Baros 264.5 12,602 48
8. Mekar Jaya 189.3 8,274 44
9. Patrol Sari 314.9 11,517 37
10. Rancakole 206.6 14,029 68
11. Andol Mekar 162.8 7,861 48
Total 5,217.1 128,857 25
1. Sukamanah 347.8 6,318 18
2. Tegal Sumedang 299.9 3,166 11
3. Rancaekek Kulon 364.3 11,136 31
4. Rancaekek Wetan 456.9 33,243 73
5. Bojong Loa 567.7 15,259 27
6. Jelegong 454.0 12,737 28
7. Suka Mulya 250.9 8,668 35
Rancaekek
8. Linggar 664.4 8,823 13
9. Cangkuang 295.7 10,073 34
10. Haur Pugur 511.4 6,881 13
11. Nanjung Mekar 328.9 9,309 28
12. Bojong Salam 154.4 5,691 37
13. Sangiang 250.9 4,995 20
Total 4,947.2 136,298 28
1. Biru 517.2 21,296 41
2. Bojong 182.1 18,580 102
3. Pada Mulya 162.8 17,108 105
4. Pada Ulun 404.8 19,219 47
5. Majalaya 86.1 13,344 155
6. Maja Setra 213.5 10,737 50
Majalaya
7. Maja Kerta 141.6 13,698 97
8. Neglasari 233.6 13,228 57
9. Sukamaju 293.3 26,248 89
10. Sukamukti 153.2 15,944 104
11. Wangi Sagara 106.4 14,351 135
Total 2,494.6 183,753 74
Note *) = Sampled village
6/ Avian Influenza (AI) Vaccination Status

In general, most of the sector 4 farms in the surveyed sub districts in Cianjur
District and Bandung District had never been introduced to AI vaccination. In other
words, the coverage of AI vaccination program in both surveyed districts did not cover
the sector 4 farms well. Table 5-24 shows that the highest level of AI vaccination
coverage in three surveyed sub districts in Cianjur district only reached 22.9%, which is
in Cilaku sub district. In Bandung district, the highest percentage of AI vaccination
coverage was in Majalaya Sub district which was 11.7%.
76 | P A G E
Table 5-24. Avian Influenza Vaccination Status in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Cianjur District and Bandung
District
Number of farm AI vaccination status
District Sub district
respondent Vaccinated (%) Not vaccinated (%)
- Karangtengah 62 7 (11.3) 55 (88.7)
Cianjur - Mande 74 16 (21.6) 58 (78.4)
- Cilaku 105 24 (22.9) 81 (77.1)
- Arjasari 40 1 (2.5) 39 (97.5)
Bandung - Rancaekek 26 1 (3.8) 25 (96.2)
- Majalaya 34 4 (11.8) 30 (88.2)
In addition, frequency of vaccination in some of the sector 4 farms that had been
vaccinated with AI vaccine is also considered low. Generally, AI vaccination in sector 4
farms in both districts had only been done once. The low level of AI vaccination
coverage and irregularity in vaccination program would cause ineffectiveness in AI
disease control in sector 4 farms in both districts.
7/ Production Input and Output Flow

Species of poultry that can be found kept in sector 4 farms are kampong
chickens, ducks, geese and muscovy ducks. Seed sources for kampong chicken in
surveyed area in Bandung District and Cianjur District are shown in Table 5-25.
Table 5-25. Sources of Kampong Chicken Seed for Sector 4 Farms
Source of Chicken Seed Number of Number of
% %
Farmer Farmer
- Farmers within the same/local sub district 564 48.9 126 25.8
- Markets within the local sub district 67 5.8 14 2.9
- Self-breeding (natural hatching on the farm) 361 31.3 313 64.1
- Farmers from other sub districts 66 5.7 22 4.5
- Markets in the local district 47 4.1 1 0.2
- Poultry broker (tengkulak) 10 0.9 - -
- Poultry collectors 4 0.3 - -
- Combination of 2 or more sources mentioned above 34 3.0 12 2.5
Total 1,153 100.0 488 100.0
Most of the farmers in the surveyed area in Bandung District obtained the
kampong chicken through hatching own farm eggs (64.1%) and from farmers within
the same sub district (26%). While in general, farmers in Cianjur District obtained the
kampong chicken breeding material from farmers within the same sub district (48.9%)
and by self breeding (31.3%).
As for the source for duck breeding material, most of the farmers in the surveyed
area of Bandung district obtained their duck seeds through self breeding (59.5%) and
from farmers within the same sub district (29.7%). Majority of farmers in Cianjur
District obtained their duck seeds from farmers within the same sub district (39.1%)
and by self breeding (30.8%).
Sources of duck seed in the surveyed area in Bandung and Cianjur District are
described in detail in Table 5-26.
77 | P A G E
Table 5-26. Sources of Duck Seed for Sector 4 Farms

Source of Duck Seed Number or Number of
% %
farmer farmer
- Markets within the local sub district 8 6.0 1 2.7
- Self breeding 41 30.8 22 59.5
- Markets in the local district 12 9.0 - -
- Combination of 2 or more sources mentioned above 3 2.3 - -
Total 133 100.0 37 100.0
As for the goose seed source (see Table 5-27), the majority of farmers in the
surveyed area in Bandung District obtained their goose seeds through self breeding
(52.6%) and from farmers within the same sub district (42.1%). Whereas farmers in
the Cianjur District obtained their goose seeds from farmers within the same sub
district (28.1%), self breeding (15.6%), and from markets within the local district
(15.6%).
For the sources of bird seed, most farmers in Bandung District obtained their bird
seed through self breeding (40.5%) and from farmers within the same sub district
(20.7%), while farmers in Cianjur District obtained bird seed from farmers within the
same sub district (43.5%) and from markets within the local district (16.8%). Sources
of bird seed supply in the surveyed area in Bandung and Cianjur Districts are shown in
Table 5-28.
Table 5-27. Sources of Goose Seed for sector 4 farms
Source of Goose Seed Number of Number of
% %
farmer farmer
- Self breeding 10 15.6 10 52.6
- Markets within the local sub district 10 15.6 - -
- Farmers from other sub districts 5 7.8 - -
- Markets in the local district 8 12.5 - -
- Profit sharing system 8 12.5 - -
Total 64 100.0 19 100.0
Table 5-28. Sources of Bird Seed for Sector 4 farms

Sources of Bird Seed Number of Number of
% %
farmer farmer
- Markets in the local sub district 22 16.8 19 16.4
- Self breeding 12 9.2 47 40.5
- Farmers within the local sub district 57 43.5 24 20.7
- Profit sharing system 6 4.6 6 5.2
- Others 2 1.5 - -
Total 131 100.0 116 100.0
For the supply of muscovy duck seed, most farmers in Bandung District obtained
the seed through self breeding (55.6%) and from farmers within the same sub district
(40.3%), whereas farmers in Cianjur District obtained the seed from farmers within the
same sub district (48.1%) and through self breeding (25%). Sources for muscovy duck
78 | P A G E
seed supply in the surveyed areas in Bandung District and Cianjur District are shown in
Table 5-29.
Table 5-29. Sources of Muscovy Duck Seed for Sector 4 Farms
Sources of Muscovy Duck Seed Number of Number of
% %
farmer farmer
- Farmers within the local sub district 127 48.1 50 40.3
- Self breeding 66 25.0 69 55.6
- Markets in the local sub district 28 10.6 - -
Total 264 100.0 124 100.0
Supply of poultry seed sources (kampong chickens, ducks, geese, birds and
muscovy ducks) for sector 4 farmers as mentioned above, indicated that the mobility
of poultry sources input in both surveyed districts were carried out within the local sub
district. The marketing of sector 4 farm products in Bandung District and Cianjur
District are shown in Table 5-30.
Table 5-30. Poultry and Egg Marketing in Sector 4
Live Poultry/Egg Marketing Live Poultry Egg Live Poultry Egg
Farmer % Farmer % Farmer % Farmer %
- Through collectors 813 62.4 46 22.8 417 75.5 3 25.0
- To local sub district market 29 3.2 5 2.5 17 3.1 1 8.3
- To local district market 16 1.2 2 1.0 2 0.4 - -
- For self consumption 408 31.0 142 70.3 97 17.6 8 66.7
- Combination of 2 or more marketing
42 3.2 7 3.4 19 3.4 - -
type above
Total 1,318 100.0 202 100.0 552 100.0 12 100.0
In the surveyed areas in Bandung District, most of the live poultry in sector 4
farms were sold as products through collectors (75.5%) and others were used for self
consumption purpose (17.6%). In Cianjur District, most of the farmers sold their live
poultry through collectors (62.4%) and others used them for self consumption purpose
(31.0%). As for sector 4 farm egg products, most farmers in Bandung District (66.7%)
and Cianjur District (70.3%) consumed them for self sustenance.
G. Total Poultry Population Number and Density

The total poultry population number and density for the whole sector (1, 2, 3,
and 4) for each surveyed sub district can be seen in Table 5-31 and Table 5-32.
In Cianjur district, the highest poultry population number for sub district level
was in Mande (921,102 birds) and the lowest was in Karangtengah (287,850 birds).
The highest density for sub district level was in Cilaku (130.2 poultry/ha) and the
lowest was in Karangtengah (50.8 poultry/ha). For sampled village level, the highest
population number was in Jamali village with 464,152 birds and the lowest was in
Sukamanah village with 3,309 birds. And the highest population density was found in
Jamali village with 597.3 poultry/ha and the lowest was in Sukamanah village (5.5
poultry/ha).
79 | P A G E
Table 5-31. Total Poultry Population Number and Density in Cianjur District
Population per Sector Sector 4 Total
Population Population
Total Sector Population Population Population
Sub District Village Area (ha) Density Density of
Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 1,2,3 of Sector 4 Density of Sector
(poultry/ha) Sector 1,2,3,4
(poultry/ha) 1,2,3,4
*)
1. Sukamanah 603.6 3,309 5.5 3,309 5.5
2. Cikarang 251.8 4,355 17.3 4,355 17.3
3. Sukamantri 202.0 2,687 13.3 2,687 13.3
4. Sukasarana 266.2 2,207 8.3 2,207 8.3
5. Sukasari 295.8 3,395 11.5 3,395 11.5
*)
6. Bojong 568.2 9,300 9,300 16.4 11,045 19.4 20,345 35.8
7. Bbk. Caringin 584.5 20,000 20,000 34.2 3,464 5.9 23,464 40.1
*)
8. Subandar 478.4 4,995 10.4 4,995 10.4
Karangtengah 9. Sindangsari 388.3 4,814 12.4 4,814 12.4
10. Sukataris 299.5 6,000 6,000 20.0 4,476 14.9 10,476 35.0
11. Sidanglaka 335.9 3,113 9.3 3,113 9.3
12. Langensari 330.1 5,500 5,500 16.7 3,237 9.8 8,737 26.5
13. Hegarmanah 370.1 42,000 137,000 179,000 483.6 6,206 16.8 185,206 500.4
14. Sukajadi 301.4 2,827 9.4 2,827 9.4
15. Sukamulya 159.0 2,456 15.5 2,456 15.5
*)
16. Maleber 235.7 5,463 23.2 5,463 23.2
Total 5670.6 0 42,000 177,800 219,800 38.8 68,050 12.0 287,850 50.8
*)
1. Kademangan 432.5 11,987 27.7 11,987 27.7
*)
2. Bobojong 925.6 178,000 178,000 192.3 14,971 16.2 192,971 208.5
*)
3. Cikidang Bayabang 565.2 5,537 9.8 5,537 9.8
4. Mande 257.6 120,000 120,000 465.8 4,579 17.8 124,579 483.6
5. Mulyasari 451.4 5,092 11.3 5,092 11.3
*)
6. Jamali 777.0 226,377 200,000 20,000 446,377 574.5 17,775 22.9 464,152 597.3
Mande 7. Ciandam 757.2 40,000 40,000 52.8 6,921 9.1 46,921 62.0
8. Sukamanah 868.9 5,009 5.8 5,009 5.8
9. Leuwikoja --- 2,284 2,284
10. Mekarjaya 1,388.4 50,000 50,000 36.0 4,327 3.1 54,327 39.1
11. Kutawaringin 724.1 4,274 5.9 4,274 5.9
12. Murnisari 559.2 3,969 7.1 3,969 7.1
Total 7,707.2 226,377 200,000 408,000 834,377 108.3 86,725 11.3 921,102 119.5
*)
Cilaku 1. Sukasari 947.5 9,744 10.3 9,744 10.3
*)
2. Sirnagalih 539.6 37,500 37,500 69.5 13,032 24.2 50,532 93.6
3. Sukakerta 737.9 25,000 202,800 227,800 308.7 7,876 10.7 235,676 319.4
4. Cibinonghilir 121.4 12,500 12,500 103.0 6,254 51.5 18,754 154.5
80 | P A G E

*)
5. Rahong 345.2 87,000 87,000 252.0 7,554 21.9 94,554 273.9
6. Munjul 294.1 18,000 18,000 61.2 6,171 21.0 24,171 82.2
7. Rancagoong 335.7 10,000 10,000 29.8 6,793 20.2 16,793 50.0
8. Sindangsari 681.8 103,000 103,000 151.1 7,797 11.4 110,797 162.5
*)
9. Ciharahas 334.6 60,000 13,816 73,816 220.6 7,356 22.0 81,172 242.6
10. Mulyasari 557.2 6,080 10.9 6,080 10.9
11. Pasir Leutik 146.7 8,442 57.6 8,442 57.6
Total 5,041.8 0 85,000 484,616 569,616 113.0 87,100 17.3 656,716 130.3
Table 5-32. Total Poultry Population Number and Density in Bandung District
*)
1. Arjasari 745.2 60,000 328,500 388,500 521.3 11,232 15.1 399,732 536.4
*)
2. Pinggir Sari 1,599.0 95,000 95,000 59.4 11,362 7.1 106,362 66.5
3. Lebak Wangi 412.3 32,200 32,200 78.1 15,827 38.4 48,027 116.5
4. Batu Karut 217.0 14,300 14,300 65.9 14,759 68.0 29,059 133.9
5. Mangunjaya 586.7 10,029 17.1 10,029 17.1
6. Warga Luyu 518.7 17,000 17,000 32.8 11,299 21.8 28,299 54.6
Arjasari
7. Baros 264.5 73,000 73,000 276.0 12,576 47.5 85,576 323.5
8. Mekar Jaya 189.3 9,000 9,000 47.5 8,257 43.6 17,257 91.1
*)
9. Patrol Sari 314.9 60,000 20,000 80,000 254.1 11,517 36.6 91,517 290.6
*)
10. Rancakole 206.6 14,055 68.0 14,055 68.0
11. Andol Mekar 162.8 7,845 48.2 7,845 48.2
Total 5217.1 0 120,000 589,000 709,000 135.9 128,758 24.7 837,758 160.6
Rancaekek 1. Sukamanah 347.8 2,835 2,835 8.2 6,306 18.1 9,141 26.3
*)
2. Tegal Sumedang 299.9 700 700 2.3 3,179 10.6 3,879 12.9
3. Rancaekek Kulon 364.3 11,115 30.5 11,115 30.5
4. Rancaekek Wetan 456.9 920 920 2.0 33,181 72.6 34,101 74.6
*)
5. Bojong Loa 567.7 16,500 16,500 29.1 17,462 30.8 33,962 59.8
*)
6. Jelegong 454.0 6,190 6,190 13.6 13,734 30.3 19,924 43.9
7. Suka Mulya 250.9 1,300 1,300 5.2 8,651 34.5 9,951 39.7
8. Linggar 664.4 400 400 0.6 8,806 13.3 9,206 13.9
9. Cangkuang 295.7 9,970 9,970 33.7 10,054 34.0 20,024 67.7
*)
10. Haur Pugur 511.4 30,445 30,445 59.5 6,896 13.5 37,341 73.0
81 | P A G E

11. Nanjung Mekar 328.9 1,149 1,149 3.5 9,292 28.3 10,441 31.7
12. Bojong Salam 154.4 5,800 5,800 37.6 5,680 36.8 11,480 74.3
13. Sangiang 250.9 2,110 2,110 8.4 4,986 19.9 7,096 28.3
Total 4,947.2 0 0 78,319 78,319 15.8 139,342 28.2 217,661 44.0
1. Biru 517.2 21,252 41.1 21,252 41.1
2. Bojong 182.1 18,542 101.8 18,542 101.8
3. Pada Mulya 162.8 11,500 11,500 70.6 17,072 104.9 28,572 175.5
4. Pada Ulun 404.8 19,179 47.4 19,179 47.4
*)
5. Majalaya 86.1 1,500 1,500 17.4 13,359 155.2 14,859 172.7
*)
6. Maja Setra 213.5 10,749 50.4 10,749 50.4
Majalaya
7. Maja Kerta 141.6 12,000 12,000 84.7 13,670 96.5 25,670 181.2
*)
8. Neglasari 233.6 90 90 0.4 13,194 56.5 13,284 56.9
9. Sukamaju 293.3 26,193 89.3 26,193 89.3
10. Sukamukti 153.2 15,911 103.8 15,911 103.8
*)
11. Wangi Sagara 106.4 19,132 19,132 179.8 14,400 135.3 33,532 315.2
Total 2,494.6 0 0 44,222 44,222 17.7 183,520 73.6 227,742 91.3
82 | P A G E
In Bandung district, the highest population number for sub district level was
found in Arjasari sub district with 837,758 birds and the lowest was in Rancaekek sub
district with 217,661 birds. The highest poultry population density was found in
Arjasari sub district with 160.6 poultry/ha and the lowest density was in Rancaekek
with 44.0 poultry/ha. For sampled village level, the highest poultry population number
was found in Arjasari village with 399,732 birds and the lowest was in Tegal Sumedang
village with 3,879 birds. The highest poultry population density for sampled village
level was found in Arjasari village with 536.4 poultry/ha and the lowest was in Tegal
Sumedang village with 12.9 poultry/ha.
The total poultry population density in villages of surveyed sub districts in Cianjur
and Bandung can be seen in Figure 5-46 to Figure 5-51.
H. Poultry Sector Infrastructure

1/ Cianjur District
Cianjur district has a good potential for animal farming. The cattle population
data in 2006 indicated that the number of cow was 1,905, cattle was 23,320, buffalo
was 14,107, sheep was 264,530, goat was 87,690 and horse was 1,397. As for the
population of birds on the same year included layer 1,108,537 chicken, broiler
4,977,315 chicken, kampong chicken 2,941,234 chicken, and duck 367,487 birds.
Especially for current poultry sector; the numbers of active farms in Cianjur
district were six breeding farms, 96 broiler farms (of sector 2 and sector 3), and 28
layer farms (of sector 2 and sector 3). The patterns of poultry farming venture in
sector 2 and sector 3 in this area were the pattern of self-supporting farming and core-
plasma farming system. In order to support such poultry business activities; in Cianjur
there were seven 7 poultry shops that took a role in supplying production means.
The data of breeding farm and poultry shops in Cianjur area can be seen in Table
5-33 and Table 5-34.
Table 5-33. The List of Breeding Farm in Cianjur District - 2006
No. Company Type Strain Address
1. PT. Hybro Indonesia (GPS) Broiler Hybro Cikalong Kulon sub
Layer Hysex district
2. PT. Manggis (PS) Broiler Hybro Mande sub district
Layer Hysex
3. PT. Cipendawa (GPS and PS) Broiler Hubbard Pacet sub district
Layer Golden Commet
Layer Isa Brown
4. PT. Nuyan Farm (PS) Broiler Hubbard Cianjur sub district
5. PT. Penta Farm (PS) Broiler Hubbard Sukaresmi sub district
6. PT. Surya Tegal sari (PS) Broiler Cobb Pacet sub district
Table 5-34. The List of Poultry Shop in Cianjur District - 2006

No. Poultry Shop (PS) Address
1. Cahaya PS Jl. Pasar Baru No. 31, Cianjur
2. Subur Tani PS Jl. Pasar Baru No. 127-128, Cianjur
3. Irwan PS Jl. Pasar Baru No. 182, Cianjur
4. Berkat PS Jl. Otista No. 3, Cianjur
5. Dannas Farm PS Ds. Warung Dadas, Kec. Mande, Cianjur
6. Cikalong PS Cikalong, Cianjur
83 | P A G E
Figure 5-46. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Karangtengah Sub District in Cianjur District
84 | P A G E
Figure 5-47. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Mande Sub District in Cianjur District
85 | P A G E
Figure 5-48. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Cilaku Sub District in Cianjur District
86 | P A G E
Figure 5-49. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Arjasari Sub District in Bandung District
87 | P A G E
Figure 5-50. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Rancaekek Sub District in Bandung District
88 | P A G E
Figure 5-51. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Majalaya Sub District in Bandung District
89 | P A G E
The government body that rendered the service in animal farming sector in
Cianjur district was Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan which was address at Jl. Arif
Rahman Hakim No. 26 Kabupaten Cianjur. The facilities owned by this body were one
animal market for sheep and goat, one type-C slaughterhouse (RPH) which was still
under-equipped, and three animal health posts (Poskeswan). Out of the three posts,
only one functioned fully as service posts giving out animal health services; i.e. the one
located in Cugenang sub district. The other two posts; located in KUD Cipanas and
Agrabinta; functioned more as integrated animal service center which activities
included artificial insemination, reproduction check (PKB), Assistance Technique
Reproduction (ATR) and animal health service. The diagnostic equipment owned by
Dinas of Cianjur were testing kit for avian influenza (AI) for rapid test, pH meter,
thermometer, minor surgery equipment, microscope and formalin test for food
originated from animal and fish.
The number of human resource; with civil servant status (PNS); in this body was
141 persons. But the number of human resource that directly related to the animal
farming; in aspects of policy and operational; was only 27 persons with level of
education/expertise included veterinarian (3 persons), animal farming graduates (4
persons), veterinary medicine graduates (1 person), paramedic (9 persons), economy
graduates (1 person), high-school graduates (9 persons).
Having seen the area to cover and the poultry potency in Cianjur district; it is
certainly obvious that the current number of human resource would not suffice all the
medical expertise, paramedic expertise, and general animal farming needs.
The disease control program for avian influenza (AI) had been done in the area
since 2004; which included:
1. Socialization of AI disease; annual program.
2. Vaccination for AI on poultry of sector 4 since the end of 2004 using H5N1 vaccine,
and in the early 2006 using H5N2 vaccine.
3. Spraying disinfectant around sector 4 farms which became annual program.
The surveillance program for AI was initiated in 2005 which covered the activities
of post-vaccination antibody titer check, monitoring, and sample drawing to detect AI.
These programs were very much helped by the activity of participatory disease
surveillance/PDS team and participatory disease response/PDR team since 2006.
Besides by the government, the AI disease control was also done by private
sector; i.e. Community-based Avian Influenza Control Project (CBAIC) addressed at
Gedung BRI II Suite 2807, Jl. Jendral Sudirman no. 44-46 Jakarta. This institution was
built on the collaboration among the National Committee on AI Control (Komite
Nasional Pengendalian Flu Burung) in order to raise awareness against AI pandemic
(Komnas FBPI), USAID, and Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Cianjur district. The
activity was to help local government to socialize the mitigation and prevention of AI
disease, formed up team of volunteers to control AI and performed disinfectant at sub
district level.
This program had trained 30 volunteers across sub districts in Cianjur district
who actively participated in the socialization of AI disease, reported AI cases, and
90 | P A G E
performed disinfection in their own territory. It seemed effective to help overcoming

the shortage on medical and paramedic human resource in the area.
Furthermore, Cianjur district also had poultry associations involved in the AI
control. One of the associations was Tri Mitra group that focused in broiler farming
with 20 members. The activity of this group against AI included improving the
biosecurity on their pens.
Other poultry group in the area of Cianjur district can be seen in Table 5-35.
Table 5-35. Poultry Groups in Cianjur District
No. Group Name Address

1 Kelompok Ternak Puyuh Bina Satwa Kademangan Mande sub district
2 Kelompok Ayam Buras Pasir Lama Cibinonghilir Cilaku sub district
3 Kelompok Ayam Buras Laksana Mulya Sirnagalih Cilaku sub district
4 Kelompok Itik Mekartani I Rahong Cilaku sub district
5 Kelompok Itik Mekartani I Rahong Cilaku sub district
6 Kelompok Itik Mandiri Sindangjaya Karangtengah sub district
7 Kelompok Itik Papit Babakan Caringin Karangtengah sub district
The map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Cianjur district location and
poultry shop can be seen in Figure 5-52.
2/ Bandung District
Bandung district is one of animal farming centers in West Java province, both for
large ruminant as well as poultry. Data of large ruminant in 2006 showed that the
population of cow was 53,202, cattle was 8,582, buffalo was 6,742, horse was 4,924,
goat was 60,145 and sheep was 421,142. As for the poultry population data in the
same year showed that broiler amounted to 4,574,250 birds, layer amounted to
572,329 birds, kampong chicken was 4,177,909 birds, and duck was 576,967 birds.
In order to support the poultry business in this area; there were four poultry
shops that took the role in supplying the poultry production means; i.e. Haji Ade in
Ranca Panjang village of Majalaya sub district, Cikaro Poultry Shop in Mojokerta of
Majalaya sub district, Sukamanah Poultry Shop in Banjaran sub district, and PD. Rahayu
located in Rancaekek sub district.
The government body that rendered the service in animal farming sector in
Bandung district was Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan which was address at Komplek
Pemda Kabupaten Bandung Jl. Raya Soreang Km. 17 Soreang Sub district Soreang. The
main task of this body; according to the regional law no. 9 of year 2002 is to formulize
the technical policy and to implement technical operational activity in sector of animal
farming and fishery that covered production, resource management, business
promotion, development, dissemination and implementation of Dinas administration.
To answer the responsibility of performing the development in animal farming and
fishery on 45 sub districts of Bandung then Dinas Peternakan and Perikanan developed
its organization structure which included Head of Dinas, administration section, sub
Dinas for production, sub Dinas for resource management, sub Dinas for business
promotion, sub Dinas for development and dissemination, and a regional technical unit
implementer (UPTD) covering animal slaughterhouse, fish seedling, and cattle
breeding.
91 | P A G E
Figure 5-52. Map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Cianjur District Location and Existing Poultry Shop
92 | P A G E
The facilities this body owned were slaughterhouse (RPH) and poskeswan which
were located in Kampung Pasir Jambu of Ciwidey sub district. Unfortunately the
condition of this poskeswan was already not functional as expected and it would be
moved to Katapang sub district. The available diagnostic equipment included testing
kit of avian influenza (AI) for rapid test, microscope, milk quality tester, formalin test
for food originated from animal and fish, personal protection equipment (mask, gloves,
workwear, goggles, hard head, and boots), disinfectant spraying tool, and automatic
syringe (socorex).
The number of human resource with civil servant status was 133 persons. But
the number of human resource that directly related to the animal farming; in aspects
of policy and operational; was only 52 persons.
The AI control program had been implemented in phase since 2004; this covered
(1) socialization on AI disease to all farmers and broad community regularly since 2004,
and (2) vaccination, disinfection by spraying, depopulation, and improvement in
biosecurity. The vaccination and disinfection program were implemented especially on
sector 4 farms; as for sector 1 and other commercial farms that programs were for the
owner of respected farms to take control.
The AI disease surveillance was also initiated in 2004; i.e. through activities of
monitoring and sample drawing for regular testing. This surveillance program was very
much helped by the activity of participatory disease surveillance/PDS team and
participatory disease response/PDR team since 2006.
The involvement of private sector in the control and surveillance of AI was also
found in Bandung district. In Cipatat sub district, the breeding farm company
performed the AI control through regular vaccination to the flock in sector 4 farms in
the surrounding area of the company. Also in BBH Ciparay, PT. Medion gave in AI
vaccination aid for as many as 10,000 dosages through province Dinas Peternakan.
This company also performed socialization to all farmers and broad community and
held special short course to team up volunteers as vaccinator for sector 4 farms.
Besides the above facts, there were poultry associations found in this area that
had taken active participation in AI disease control such as poultry farmer group and
PPUI of Bandung district. This group actively involved in socialization and extension
activities on AI disease to local community. This involvement of private sector and
community in the program of AI control surely helped out Dinas to overcome the
shortage in human resource for medic and paramedic personnel.
The map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Bandung district location and
existing poultry shops can be seen in Figure 5-53.
93 | P A G E
Figure 5-53. Map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Bandung District Location and Existing Poultry Shop
94 | P A G E
6 CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATION
A. Conclusion
In short, there are some points to take into account as the result of this poultry
sector survey activity; they are:
1. In general, the locations of sector 1, 2, and 3 farms in the three sub districts
surveyed in Cianjur and Bandung districts were quite strategic and adequately
supported by road infrastructure. In average for most of the sub-districts (except for
farms in Karangtengah sub district of Cianjur district) the estimated distance among
poultry farms was less than the officially required 1 kilometer.
2. The poultry population numbers of sector 1, 2, 3, and 4 farms in the three surveyed
sub districts of Cianjur district were 1,865,668 poultry, with the poultry population
density across sub districts varied from 50.8 poultry/ha to 130.3 poultry/ha. This
numbers were higher than the ones in Bandung district; i.e. the population was
1,283,161 poultry and the density varied from 44.0 poultry/ha to 160.0 poultry/ha.
For the sampled village level in Cianjur, the highest poultry population number was
found in Jamali village with 464,152 birds and the population density of 597.3
poultry/ha and the lowest was in Sukamanah village with 3,309 birds and the
population density of 5.5 poultry/ha. As for Bandung, the highest poultry population
was found in Arjasari village with 399,732 birds and the population density of 536.4
poultry/ha, and the lowest was in Tegal Sumedang village with 3,879 birds and the
population density of 12.9 poultry/ha.
3. In general, the respondents interviewed were quite cooperative; except for some
farmers who refused to be interviewed on the condition that their farms were
inoperative.
4. The poultry composition in sector 1 and 3 farms in the three surveyed sub districts
of Cianjur district was dominated by broiler; while for sector 2 farms, it was by layer
type. On the other hand; in Bandung, the poultry composition between broiler and
layer on sector 3 in the three surveyed sub districts was relatively balanced.
5. For the last three years the average of sector 3 farms suffering from IBD was
relatively higher than the other two diseases (AI and ND), both in Cianjur district as
95 | P A G E
well as in Bandung district. IBD was suffered by the whole sub districts surveyed in
both districts with various distribution levels.
6. For sector 2 farm in Cianjur, the AI vaccination coverage (75%) was relatively higher
than of IBD (50%); although it was still lower than of ND (100%). While in Bandung,
the vacination coverage was the same for all diseases (100%). As for sector 3 farm,
the AI vaccination coverage (32.6% in Cianjur and 40.2% in Bandung) was far lower
than of ND (95.3% in Cianjur and 72.3% in Bandung) and IBD (88.4% in Cianjur and
70.5% in Bandung).
7. The production input on poultry sector 1, 2 and 3 farms in the surveyed areas was
generally obtained from relatively the same location; primarily from West Java
province, Banten, and DKI Jakarta.
8. The product marketing coverage of poultry sector 1 farms was far broader than the
other sectors. The sector 1 farms poultry product was marketed to other islands in
Indonesia while the sector 2 and sector 3 poultry product covered only to West Java
and DKI Jakarta.
9. The slaughterhouse ventures, live poultry traders in wet markets and poultry
collectors obtained the poultry product from local district and from other nearby
districts; while the consumers were from local sub districts.
10. Most of the sector 4 farm business in the surveyed areas was considered as side job
for the household resulting in the relatively low biosecurity level, low AI vaccination
coverage, and irregular AI vaccination activity.
11. Most of poultry input/seedlings around sector 4 farms in the surveyed areas were
from local sub districts. While the live poultry marketing products were mostly sold
to poultry collectors.
12. In general, the poultry population and density on sector 4 farms at each surveyed
sub district in Bandung was relatively higher than at each sub district in Cianjur
district.
13. The availability of facility and human resource in both districts were generally still
inadequate to cover their vast working area and to manage livestock potencies on
both districts.
B. Recommendations
1. An advanced and further integrated study is necessary in order to support the effort
of the improvement of biosecurity quality around sector 4 farms in both surveyed
areas. This study can be implemented in the following steps:
First step is to assess the initial/actual condition of biosecurity around sector 4
farm in a more comprehensive way and broader area coverage in both districts
(baseline survey).
96 | P A G E
Second step is to give treatment to target with an extension program covering

the improvement in knowledge, skill, and understanding (awareness) around
sector 4 farmers in the implementation of proper biosecurity practices.
Third step is to re-assess the biosecurity condition around sector 4 farm (post
treatment survey).
2. In order to implement a similar survey in other areas, we would suggest to secure
and confirm and reconfirm the baseline data from the local Dinas Peternakan to
ensure the valid data for further process. Furthermore, an intensive socialization on
the objective and benefit of the survey to target respondents is also crucial to
ensure their participation in the survey.
97 | P A G E
7 APPENDICES
1. Questionnaire for Grand Parent Stock
2. Questionnaire for Parent Stock
3. Questionnaire for Sector 2 and Sector 3 Farm
4. Questionnaire for Poultry Collector/Trader
5. Questionnaire for Slaughterhouse
6. Questionnaire for Wet Market
7. Questionnaire for Poultry Sector Infrastructure
8. Questionnaire for Sector 4 Farm
98 | P A G E
A. Questionnaire for Grand Parent Stock
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
GRAND PARENT STOCK
District : Bandung/Cianjur *)
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
99 | P A G E
1. Owner : .....................................................................................................
2. Company Name: .....................................................................................................
3. Address of the farm:

.....................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
4. GPS Details: .....................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
5. Number of poultry employee :
Owner/family ..............................................................person
Employee ..............................................................person
6. Number of poultry :
Layer .............................................................chicken
Broiler .............................................................chicken
7. Please state the others poultry in the farm (if any) :
8. Species 9. Type 10. Number
11. Distance between poultry commercial farms : ................... meter
100 | P A G E
12. Disease History The Last 3 Years

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last three
years.
FREQUENCY OF POPULATION
LAST CONTROL BY
NO DISEASE 3 LAST YEAR MORBIDITY MORTALITY WHEN DIAGNOSED BY HANDLING
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
What diseases How many the last When was the last How many How many What was the Who confirmed What kind Action taken
did the poultry 3 years disease disease chicken were chicken were population the disease? of handling by Dinas
suffer from occurance? occurrence infected (by dead (by when the did the Peternakan
within the last (disease)? disease)? disease)? disease struck? company ?
three years? (month and year) apply?
1 Avian Influenza month year Official from
.................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
chicken chicken chicken Private ....
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
101 | P A G E
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
2 Newcastle month year Official from
Disease .................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
102 | P A G E
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
3 Gumboro month year Official from
.................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
13. Applied Vaccination Program
103 | P A G E
We would like to know about your vaccination program:

14. Vaccination program for chicken
Vaccination Vaccination Schedule (regular/irregular)
No Disease Does company apply Is the vaccination Vaccination Vaccination Vaccination
vaccination? program regular? Schedule Type Company
1 Avian Influenza Yes None Yes No
1 2 1 2
2 ND Yes None Yes No
1 2 1 2
3 Gumboro Yes None Yes No
1 2 1 2
15. Vaccination program for DOC

No Vaccine Type Vaccination Schedule
104 | P A G E
16. Production Input Procurement

We would like to know about production input procurement at your company.
Volume Strain Source Notes
What is the input volume What strain (type of Where does your Please state any
No Type of Production Input of each cycle (please production input) does company get such input related important
explain)? your company use? (type of production information, if any.
input)?
1 DOC
Broiler Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
Layer Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
2 Pullet
Broiler Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
Layer Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
105 | P A G E
x
3 Feed Factory
.............. Ton Distributor
Poultry shop
Cooperative
Core Farmer
Other, ...............
4 Vaccine Medicine company

.............. dosage/............ ...................................... Distributor
Poultry shop
......................................
Dinas Peternakan
...................................... Other, ...............
5 Vitamins and other Medicine company
medicines .............. dosage/............ Distributor
x
Poultry shop
Dinas Peternakan
Other, ...............
106 | P A G E
17. Product Marketing (you may want to contact companys marketing manager)
We would like to know your companys marketing information.
Volume Marketing Area Consumer Remarks
What is the product Where does your company market the Who are the consumers? Please state
Type of Production volume of each products? (Please state the company any related
No
Input marketing cycle address) important
(please explain)? information, if
any.
1 DOC
Broiler ............................................................... PS Farm, The number
.............. chicken .............................................................. of PS ..................
..............................................................
Other, ............... The
...............................................................
number
.............................................................. .................................
..............................................................
...............................................................
..............................................................
..............................................................
Layer ............................................................... PS Farm, The number

.............. chicken ............................................................... of PS ..................
...............................................................
Other, ............... The
...............................................................
number
............................................................... .................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
107 | P A G E

...............................................................
Excess Male ............................................................... Direct to comercial

Layer/Broiler .............. chicken ............................................................... farm
Agent/Poultry shop
...............................................................
Farmer Group
............................................................... Others, ...............
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
2 Rejected eggs Wet Market

.............. egg .................................................. Restaurant/catering
Directly to end-user
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
2 Rejected chicken Wet Market
.............. .................................................. Restaurant/catering
chicken/............... Directly to end-user
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
108 | P A G E
B. Questionnaire for Parent Stock
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
PARENT STOCK
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
109 | P A G E
1. Owner : .....................................................................................................
2. Company Name: .....................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
4. GPS Details: .....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................
5. Number of poultry employee:
Owner/family ..............................................................person
Employee ..............................................................person
6. Number of poultry:
Layer .............................................................chicken
Broiler .............................................................chicken
7. Please state the others poultry in the farm (if any) :
Species Type Number
110 | P A G E

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last three
years.
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
.................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
111 | P A G E
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
Disease .................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
112 | P A G E
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
.................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....

113 | P A G E
(i) Vaccination program for chicken

1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2
(ii) Vaccination program for DOC

No Vaccine Type Vaccination Schedule
114 | P A G E

input)?
1 DOC
Broiler Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
Layer Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
2 Pullet
Broiler Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
Layer Cobb
.............. chicken ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
115 | P A G E
x
3 Feed Factory
.............. Ton Distributor
Poultry shop
Cooperative
Core Farmer
Other, ...............

Poultry shop
......................................
Dinas Peternakan
...................................... Other, ...............
5 Vitamins and other Medicine company
x
Poultry shop
Dinas Peternakan
Other, ...............
116 | P A G E
What is the product Where does your company market the Who are the consumers? Please state
Type of Production volume of each products? (Please state the company any related
No
Input marketing cycle address) important
(please explain)? information, if
any.
1 DOC
Broiler ............................................................... Direct to commercial
.............. chicken .............................................................. farm, the number
.........
..............................................................
Agent/Poultry shop,
............................................................... the
.............................................................. number........................
.............................................................. ..
Farmer Group, the
...............................................................
number
.............................................................. ..........................
.............................................................. Other, ............... The
number
.................................
Layer ............................................................... Direct to commercial
.............. chicken ............................................................... farm, the number
.........
...............................................................
Agent/Poultry shop,
............................................................... the
............................................................... number........................
............................................................... ..
Farmer Group, the
...............................................................
number
............................................................... ..........................
117 | P A G E

............................................................... Other, ............... The
............................................................... number
.................................
Male Layer ............................................................... Direct to commercial

.............. chicken ............................................................... farm, the number
.........
...............................................................
Agent/Poultry shop,
............................................................... the
............................................................... number........................
............................................................... ..
Farmer Group, the
...............................................................
number
............................................................... ..........................
Other, ............... The
number
.................................
2 Rejected eggs Wet Market
.............. egg .................................................. Restaurant/catering
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
2 Rejected chicken Wet Market
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
118 | P A G E
C. Questionnaire for Sector 2 and Sector 3 Farm
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SEC
SECTOR 2 AND 3
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
119 | P A G E
1. Sector : 2 / 3 /*
2. Owner : ..................................................................................................
3. Company Name: .....................................................................................................
4. Venture Type : Self-support/Partnership/Plasma
5. Name of the partnership : .
of plasma the farm belongs to

.....................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
7. GPS Details: .....................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
8. Number of poultry*:
Layer ............................................................ chicken
Broiler ............................................................ chicken
9. Please state species, type and number of poultry
Species Type Number
120 | P A G E

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last three years.
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
.................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
121 | P A G E
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
Disease .................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....
122 | P A G E
LAST CONTROL BY
OCCURRENCE DINAS
OCCURANCE OCCURRED
.................... .................... .................... Dinas .....................
veterinarian .....................
Other: ....
................ .....................
....

123 | P A G E

1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2
4 Cholera Yes None Yes No
1 2 1 2
124 | P A G E

input)?
1 DOC
Broiler/Layer* Cobb
.............. chicken/............. ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
*) please choose
2 Pullet (for layer farm only) Cobb
.............. chicken/............. ROSS ......................................
Isa Brown
......................................
Lohmann
Other, ............... ......................................
x
3 Feed Factory
.............. kg/............... Distributor
Poultry shop
Cooperative
Core Farmer
Other, ...............

Poultry shop
......................................
Dinas Peternakan
...................................... Other, ...............
5 Vitamins and other x Medicine company
Poultry shop
Dinas Peternakan
Other, ...............
125 | P A G E

What is the product Where does your company Who are the consumers? Please state
Type of Production volume of each market the products? any related
No
Input marketing cycle (please (Please state the company important
explain)? address) information, if
any.
1 Egg Wet Market
.............. kg/................... .................................................. Restaurant/catering
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
2 Spent hen Wet Market
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
3 Broiler Wet Market
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
4 Rooster layer Wet Market
..................................................
Other,
.................................................. .....................................
126 | P A G E
D. Questionnaire for Poultry Collector/Trader
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
COLLECTOR-
COLLECTOR-TRADER
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
127 | P A G E
1. Company Name:.......................................................................................
2. Core Company Name:.......................................................................................
3. Owner /Traders Name:....................................................................................
4. Address (of location of the poultry):
....................................................................................
.........................................................................................
5. GPS details:
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
6. Do you own a poultry slaughter site: Yes/No*
7. Company Profile
We would like to know about your company:
STOCKPEN CAPACITY SLAUGHTER AREA*)

EXPERIENCE
VENTURE TYPE
(YEAR) Slaughter
Capacity
Area (m2) Area (m2) Volume
(chicken)
(chicken/day)
What sort of legal How long has How many m2 What is the total What is the How many
status does your your venture does your capacity of your area (m2) of chicken in
venture belong been establishment stockpen? your average do you
to? established? manage? slaughter regularly
site? slaughter per
day?
PT <1 year .......................... Chicken. ........................
CV 1-3 years m2 Ducks.. .. Chicken.
No legal status >3 years m2
The
Ducks..
others
The
others
*)for traders with poultry-slaughter site only
8. Poultry Profile
We would like to know about the types of poultry you trade daily.
POULTRY TYPE VOLUME (CHICKEN/DAY) SOURCE
NO How many chicken in From where (sub-district or
What sort of poultry
average do you trade village) do you generally get
do you venture?
daily (per poultry type)? the poultry (type)?
1 Broiler chicken/day
2 Spent layer chicken/day
3 Kampong chicken chicken/day
4 Duck duck/day
5. Other poultry: ..
6. Other poultry.
128 | P A G E

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last 3 years.
FREQUENCY OF 3
TYPE OF POULTRY CLINICAL
NO DISEASE LAST YEAR LAST OCCURENCE MORBIDITY MORTALITY DIAGNOSED BY HANDLING
SUFFERRED SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
What diseases How many the When was the last What types of How many (poultry) were How many (poultry) Please Who confirmed What was
did the poultry last 3 years disease occurrence poultry were infected (by disease)? were dead (by elaborate the the disease? the
suffer from within disease (disease)? affected by (the disease)? symptoms of handling
the last 3 years? occurance? (month and year) disease)? such disease on such
disease?
1 Avian Influenza month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from
Spent layer ..........chicken ..........chicken Dinas
Kampong Spent layer: Spent layer: Private
chicken chicken ................chicken veterinarian
Duck Kampong chicken Kampong
: chicken chicken: Other:
Duck: .................chicken ................
.................duck Duck:
.................duck
2 ND/tetelo month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

129 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
chicken ........chicken ..........chicken veterinarian
Duck Kampong Kampong Other:
chicken:.........chicken chicken:..chicke ................
Duck: n
.................duck Duck:
.................duck
3 Gumboro month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

chicken ........chicken .......chicken veterinarian
Duck Kampong Kampong
Other:
130 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
chicken:....chicken chicken:.chicken ................
Duck: Duck:
.................duck .................duck
4 The others month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

chicken:....chicken chicken:.chicken Other:
Duck: Duck: ................
.................duck .................duck
131 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE

chicken:....chicken chicken:.chicken Other:
Duck: Duck: ................
.................duck .................duck
132 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
10. Product Marketing

We would like to know about your product marketing.
VOLUME (PRODUCT/DAY) TRADING SERVICE
NO POULTRY TYPE CONSUMER TYPE
LIVE POULTRY CARCASS DIRECT DELIVERED
What types of How many live poultry How much carcass in Do your customers Who are your customers?
poultry do you in average do you average do you trade come to you for
trade? trade (poultry type) (poultry type) daily? products or do you
daily? deliver them to your
customers?
133 | P A G E

LIVE POULTRY CARCASS DIRECT DELIVERED
1 Broiler Yes No Yes No 1. Catering
chicken/day chicken/day
2. Trader
1 2 1 2 3. Restaurant
4. Slaughterhouse
5. ...............................
2 Spent layer Yes No Yes No 1. Catering
chicken/day chicken/day
2. Trader
4. Slaughterhouse
5. ...............................
Yes No Yes No 1. Catering
3 Other (please poultry/day poultry/day
2. Trader
name) 1 2 1 2 3. Restaurant
4. Slaughterhouse
5. ...............................
134 | P A G E
11. Facility
We would like to know about the existing facilities at your establishment.
NO. FACILITY CATEGORY REMARKS
1 What is the source for your water? Tap water
Artesian/drilled well
Well
River
Irrigation
Pond
Lake
Other: .......................................
2 What kind of waste processing system do you a. Solid waste:
apply? Buried
Burned
Processed for compost
Other............................................
b. Liquid waste:
Dump pool
Canalled into river/open water
Other.............................................
c. Combination of solid and liquid waste
system:
Dump pool
Buried
Other.............................................
3 Is the stockpen well-ventilated? Yes
No
4 Is the stockpen equipped with fan? Yes
No
5 Is there a place for treating sick poultry? Yes
No
135 | P A G E

6 How do you deal with dead poultry? Buried
Burned
Other..................................................................
7. Do you desinfect the stock pens Yes, desinfection type :
.........................frequency of
desinfection.................times/........
No
8. Do you have facilities for disinfection of poultry Yes, Type of facilities :................................
crates No
9. Do you have facilites for desinfection of vehicles Yes, Type of facilities :................................
transporting poultry No
10 Please name any other facilities, if any:
...........................................................................
...........................................................................
136 | P A G E
E. Questionnaire for Slaughterhouse
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
POULTRY SLAUGHTER PLACE
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
137 | P A G E
1. Company Name: ........................................................................................

2. Core Company Name: .......................................................................................
3. Owner/Trader: .......................................................................................
4. Address : .......................................................................................
.......................................................................................
5. GPS details: .......................................................................................
.......................................................................................
6. Company Profile
We would like to know about your establishment.
STOCKPEN CAPACITY SLAUGHTER AREA*)

EXPERIENCE
VENTURE TYPE Slaughter
(YEAR)
Capacity Volume
Area (m2) Area (m2)
(chicken) (chicken/da
y)
What sort of legal How long has How many What is the What is How many
status does your your venture m2 does your total the area chicken in
venture belong been establishmen capacity (m2) of average do
to? established? t manage? of your your you regularly
stockpen? slaughter slaughter per
site? day?
PT <1 year ....................... .................... .................. .......................
CV 1-3 years ... ..... chicken ..... m2 ...
No legal status >3 years m2 .......................
...
chicken
7. Poultry Profile
We would like to know about the types of poultry you trade daily.
POULTRY TYPE VOLUME (CHICKEN/DAY) SOURCE
From where (sub-
NO How many chicken in
What sort of poultry district or village) do
average do you trade
do you venture? you generally get the
daily (per poultry type)?
poultry (type)?
1 Broiler chicken/day ..
2 Spent layer chicken/day ..
3 Kampong chicken chicken/day ..
4 Duck duck/day ..
5. Other poultry; ..
6. Other poultry: .
138 | P A G E

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of last three years.
FREQUENCY OF 3
NO DISEASE LAST YEAR LAST OCCURENCE
SUFFERRED
MORBIDITY MORTALITY
SYMPTOMS
DIAGNOSED BY HANDLING
OCCURANCE
What diseases How many the last 3 When was the last What types of How many (poultry) How many (poultry) Please Who confirmed What was the
did the poultry years disease disease occurrence poultry were were infected (by were dead (by elaborate the the disease? handling on
suffer from within occurance? (disease)? affected by (the disease)? disease)? symptoms of such disease?
the last year? (month and year) disease)? such disease
1 Avian Influenza month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

chicken ................chicken ................chicken veterinarian
Duck Kampong chicken: Kampong chicken:
.................chicken .................chicken Other:
................
Duck: Duck:
.................duck .................duck
2 ND/tetelo month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

Kampong Spent layer: Spent layer:
139 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED
MORBIDITY MORTALITY
SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
chicken ................chicken ................chicken Private
Duck Kampong chicken: Kampong chicken: veterinarian
Duck: Duck: ................
.................duck .................duck
3 Gumboro month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

140 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED
MORBIDITY MORTALITY
SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
Duck: Duck: ................
.................duck .................duck
4 The Others month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: Official from

................
Duck: Duck:
141 | P A G E
FREQUENCY OF 3
SUFFERRED
MORBIDITY MORTALITY
SYMPTOMS
OCCURANCE
.................duck .................duck

................
Duck: Duck:
.................duck .................duck
142 | P A G E
9. Product Marketing
We would like to know about your product marketing.
CARCASS DIRECT DELIVERED
What types of poultry How much carcass in average Do your customers come to Who are your customers?
do you trade? do you trade (poultry type) you for products or do you
daily? deliver them to your
customers?
1 Broiler Yes No Yes No 1. Catering
chicken/day
2. Trader
4. ...............................
2 Spent layer Yes No Yes No 1. Catering
chicken/day
2. Trader
4. ...............................
Yes No Yes No 1. Catering
3 Other (please name) poultry/day
2. Trader
4. ...............................
143 | P A G E
Facility
We would like to know about the existing facilities at your establishment.
Well
River
Irrigation
Pond
Lake
Other: .......................................
2 What kind of waste processing system do you d. Solid waste:
apply? Buried
Burned
Other............................................
e. Liquid waste:
Dump pool
Other.............................................
f. Combination of solid and liquid waste
system:
Dump pool
Buried
Other.............................................
3 Is the stockpen well-ventilated? Yes
No
4 Is the stockpen equipped with fan? Yes
No
No
144 | P A G E

Burned
Other..................................................................
7. Do you desinfect the stock pens Yes, desinfection type :
.........................frequency of
desinfection.................times/........
No
8. Do you have facilities for disinfection of poultry Yes, Type of facilities :................................
crates No
9. Do you have facilites for desinfection of vehicles Yes, Type of facilities :................................
transporting poultry No
...........................................................................
...........................................................................
145 | P A G E
F. Questionnaire for Wet Market
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
WET MARKET
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
146 | P A G E
1. Market Name : .............................................................................

2. Address : .............................................................................
3. GPS Details : .............................................................................
4. Number of Poultry Trader : ........................ traders
We would like to know about names of active traders, poultry type they trade, daily
trading volume, and the source of poultry
NO. TRADER NAME POULTRY TYPE VOLUME/DAY SOURCE
Please state the name of What popultry type How many poultry in average do Where (district) do
the poultry trader. do you trade? you trade daily? you get the
poultry to trade?
1 Broiler Broiler: ..........chicken
Spent layer Spent layer: ................chicken
Kampong chicken Kampong chicken: .................
Duck chicken
Quails Duck: ................. ducks
other Quails....................quails
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
147 | P A G E

Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
148 | P A G E

Other..........................

Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
Duck chicken
Other..........................
149 | P A G E

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in the market within the period of the last 3 years.
FREQUENCY
OF 3 LAST TYPE OF
CLINICAL
NO DISEASE YEAR LAST OCCURRENCE POULTRY MORBIDITY MORTALITY
SYMPTOMS
OCCURANC SUFFERED
E
What How many When was the last What types of How many (poultry) How many (poultry) Please Who confirmed What was the
diseases did the last 3 disease occurrence poultry were were infected (by were dead (by elaborate the disease? handling on
the poultry years disease (disease)? affected by disease)? disease)? the such disease?
suffer from occurance? (month and year) (the disease)? symptoms of
within the such
last year? disease
1. Avian month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: ..........chicken Official from
Influenza Spent layer ..........chicken Spent layer: Dinas
Kampong Spent layer: ................chicken Private
chicken ................chicken Kampong chicken: veterinarian
Duck Kampong chicken: .................chicken
.................chicken Other:
Duck: ................
Duck: .................duck
.................duck
2 ND/tetelo month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: ..........chicken Official from

Spent layer ..........chicken Spent layer: Dinas
.................chicken Other:
Duck: ................
Duck: .................duck
.................duck
150 | P A G E
FREQUENCY
OF 3 LAST TYPE OF
CLINICAL
NO DISEASE YEAR LAST OCCURRENCE POULTRY MORBIDITY MORTALITY DIAGNOSED BY HANDLING
SYMPTOMS
OCCURANC SUFFERED
E
What How many When was the last What types of How many (poultry) How many (poultry) Please Who confirmed What was the
diseases did the last 3 disease occurrence poultry were were infected (by were dead (by elaborate the disease? handling on
the poultry years disease (disease)? affected by disease)? disease)? the such disease?
suffer from occurance? (month and year) (the disease)? symptoms of
within the such
last year? disease
3 Gumboro month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: ..........chicken Official from
Spent layer ..........chicken Spent layer: Dinas
.................chicken Other:
Duck: ................
Duck: .................duck
.................duck
4 Other month year Broiler Broiler: Broiler: ..........chicken Official from

....................... Spent layer ..........chicken Spent layer: Dinas
.................chicken Other:
Duck: ................
Duck: .................duck
.................duck
6. Do you run a slughter service? If Yes, proceed to the next form, if No the interview ends
7. Facility
We would like to know about the existing facilities at your market
151 | P A G E

Well
River
Irrigation
Pond
Lake
Other: .......................................
2 What kind of waste processing system do you g. Solid waste:
apply? Buried
Burned
Other............................................
h. Liquid waste:
Dump pool
Other.............................................
i. Combination of solid and liquid waste
system:
Dump pool
Buried
Other.............................................
3 Is the stockyard well-ventilated? Yes
No
4 Is the stockyard equipped with fan? Yes
No
No
Burned
Other..................................................................
152 | P A G E

7 The desinfect Yes, the type of disinfection: .
Frequency of disinfection
:times/..
No
...........................................................................
...........................................................................
153 | P A G E
G. Questionnaire for Poultry Sector Infrastructure
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
POULTRY SECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
154 | P A G E
A. Veterinary Service Support (by the Government and Private Sector)
GPS Details : .
.
(1). Please state the number and educational background/expertise of
human resource around Dinas/Sub Dinas Peternakan:
Please state the expertise/educational
background of human resource around your Person Remarks
establishment
Medical veterinary
Animal husbandry
Paramedic

(2). Please name the existing facilities owned by Dinas/Sub Dinas Peternakan:
Facility Type Number Address GPS Details

Laboratory
Diagnostic equipment x x
Animal Health Post
..
..
..
(3). Please name the AI control and surveillance program applied for your
area:
Program Activity Year Applied
AI Control Program
1) ____________________ ____________________
2) ____________________ ____________________
3) ____________________ ____________________
4) ____________________ ____________________
5) ____________________ ____________________
AI Surveillance
1) ____________________ ____________________
2) ____________________ ____________________
3) ____________________ ____________________
4) ____________________ ____________________
5) ____________________ ____________________
(4). Was there any involvement of private sector in such activities or program
of AI control and surveillance in your area?
Yes, there was.
155 | P A G E
None (continue to part B)
(5). If Yes, please name the involved institution (private sector) and its
detailed activity in the following table:
Involved Institution Activity Remarks

AI control program:
..
..

AI surveillance:

..

Other activity, if any:
.
..

AI control program:
..
..

AI surveillance:

..

.
..

AI control program:
..
..

AI surveillance:

..

.
..

156 | P A G E
Involved Institution Activity Remarks

AI control program:
..
..

AI surveillance:

..

.
..

B. Association, Integration, and Participatory Disease Control Program
(1). Please name the active poultry association around your area, its
membership and activities:
Activity Type/
Number of Member Form of
Nature of
Association (person/farmer) in Participation in
Membership
each association Disease Control
Program
..
..
..
..
(2). Please state the number of active core farmers, plasma/partners, and
independent farmers around your area:
Number of Number of Member
Groups
Farmer (for core farmer)
Within the local area: ............ farmers
Core farmer
Outside the local area: ............ farmers
Plasma/partner
Independent farmer
(3). Please name the participatory poultry disease control program actively
implemented around your area:
Activity in the Implemented Poultry Disease
Group Name
Control Program
.
157 | P A G E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
C. Supplier and Trader of Production Input (Feed, Medicines, and Vaccine) at

site:
(1). Please state the name and address of active suppliers/traders of

production input at site:
Supplier/Trader Address GPS Details

. .
. .
. .
. ..
. ..
(2). Please state the type and number of product traded by the above player:
Type of Product Volume/month Remarks

Feed
Medicine
Vitamin
Vaccine

(3). Please state the number of customers of each production input

supplier/trader:
Number of
Supplier/Trader Remarks
Customer at Site

158 | P A G E

159 | P A G E
H. Questionnaire for Sector 4 Farm
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SECTOR 4 POULTRY FARMER
(KAMPONG CHICKEN/DUCK)
Sub-district :
Enumerator :
Date of interview :
*) choose one
160 | P A G E
1. Owner: ...........................................................................................
2. Address: ...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
3. GPS details: ...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................
4. Please state the number and type of poultry you currently keep:
Poultry Type Number
Kampong Chicken
Duck
Swan
..................................
..................................
5. Please state the source of your seed:

Poultry Type Source
Kampong Chicken Local sub-district market
Local district market
Other farmer from the same sub-district
Other farmer from the other sub-district
Self-provision
Other source:
..............................
Duck Local sub-district market
Self-provision
Other source:
..............................
Swan Local sub-district market
Self-provision
Other source:
..............................
Local sub-district market
................................ Local district market
Self-provision
Other source:
..............................
161 | P A G E
6. Please state the poultry and poultry-product marketing you currently apply:
Product Type Marketing
Live poultry Sold directly to local sub-district market

Sold directly to local district market
Fetched by collector trader
Other: ..................................
Egg Sold directly to local sub-district market
Sold directly to local district market
Other: ..................................
Other: Sold directly to local sub-district market
............................................ Sold directly to local district market
Other: ..................................
7. Please state the objective of your poultry culture:

Main livelihood
Side venture
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
..........................
8. Have your poultry ever suffered from AI disease?
Yes, please state the time: month ..................................................... year
........................
Never (to question no. 11)
9. If Yes, how many of your poultry died at that time: .................. birds
10. How did you know that your poultry suffered from AI disease?
Dinas paramedic
Veterinarian from animal health post (poskeswan)
Fellow farmer
Other: ..............................................................................................
11. Is such a case still going on in your area?
Yes, please state the time: month .................................................... year
.........................
No
12. Have your poultry ever been vaccinated with AI/bird flu vaccine?
Yes
No, please state the
reason:.....................................................................................................................
..........
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
.............. (skip to no. 15)
13. If Yes, how many times have your poultry been vaccinated?
Once
Twice
162 | P A G E
Three times
More than three times
163 | P A G E
14. Who did the vaccination?

Dinas paramedic
Poskeswan veterinarian
By yourself
Other: ................................................................................................
15. Please state if any, the others AI vaccination that vaccinate for your poultry
(the answer can more than one) :
................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................
16. What poultry culture system do you apply?
Poultry is kept inside a closed pen.
Poultry is kept inside a fenced-yard with poultry pen
Poultry is kept inside fenced-yard around the house
Poultry is let loose around the house
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
........................
17. In order to prevent disease infection, do you apply particular actions to
people/thing that enters or leaves your poultry farm?
Yes
None (skip to no. 18)
18. IfYes, please state your actions:
(1)...................................................................................................................................
.................................
(2)...................................................................................................................................
.................................
(3)...................................................................................................................................
.................................
(4)...................................................................................................................................
.................................
(5)...................................................................................................................................
.................................
19. What is the usual way to keep your poultrys feeding pot clean?
Wash it daily
Wash it once every three days
Wash it once a week
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
....................
20. What is the usual way to keep your poultrys drinking pot clean?
Wash it daily
Wash it once every three days
Wash it once a week
164 | P A G E
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
....................
21. How do you keep clean the flock yard?
Sweep it daily
Sweep it once every three days
Sweep it once a week
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
....................
22. How do you deal with flock manure?
Pile it somewhere (open dumping)
Pile it in a hole (close/open*)
Store it in a sack
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
....................
* choose one
23. Do you usually report to local Dinas representative/KCD if you your flock
suffers from disease?
Yes
No, please state the reason:
............................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................
..................................................... (skip to no. 25)
24. If Yes, how do you think the response from Dinas representative/KCD
toward your report?
Very responsive
Responsive
Late
Very late
25. If No, how do you deal with the sick flock of yours?
Sell them
Slaughter them
Separate them from the healthy ones for treatment
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
...............................
26. Do you usually report to local Dinas representative/KCD/Poskeswan if you find
out that your poultry dies suddenly?
Yes (skip to no. 28)
No
27. If No, what do you do with the dead flock?
Bury them
Burn them
Throw them away to the nearest river
165 | P A G E
Other:
..................................................................................................................................
...............................
28. If you buy new poultry flock, what do you usually do?
Directly put them together with the existing flock
Separate them (no contact) with the existing flock for at least 2 weeks
Other :
..................................................................................................................................
...............................
166 | P A G E
CHECKLIST FOR OBSERVATION

THE BIOSECURITY CONDITION OF POULTRY CULTURE
No Condition Observation
1 Poultry Culture Poultry is kept inside a closed pen.
System Poultry is kept inside a fenced-yard with poultry pen
Poultry is kept inside fenced-yard around the house
Poultry is let loose around the house
Other:
...................................................................................................................
......
2 Type of Pen Elevated

On the ground
Other:
...................................................................................................................
......
3 The pen floor Bamboo/wooden

Wire
Land
Cement
Other:
...................................................................................................................
......
4 Pen Ventilation Well-ventilated

Poor-ventilated
5 Density < 8 chicken/m2

8-10 chicken/m2
> 10 chicken/m2
6 Pen Cleanliness Very clean

Clean
Fairly clean
Dirty
Very dirty
7 Feed pot cleanliness Very clean

Clean
Fairly clean
Dirty
Very dirty
8 Drinking pot Very clean

cleanliness Clean
Fairly clean
Dirty
Very dirty
167 | P A G E
No Condition Observation
9 Flock yard Very clean
cleanliness Clean
Fairly clean
Dirty
Very dirty
10 Flock manure Pile it somewhere (open dumping)

handling Pile it in a hole (close/open*)
Store it in a sack
Other:
..........................................................................................................
...............
11 Flock traffic control Yes.

around the farm None, the flock pen is open and there is no control on people or
other poultry traffic.
12 If Yes, state the The flock pen is isolated against people or other poultry traffic
form of control There is a place for washing/disinfection at the gate prior to
applied (answer entering the farm area
could be more than Other:
one) ...................................................................................................................
......
13 Other conditions .........................................................................

related to .........................................................................
biosecurity needed
.........................................................................
to be noted by
enumerator .........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
168 | P A G E

Poultry Sector Survey 2007 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Poultry Sector Survey 2007 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CRESCENT 2007

5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION.....................................................................19

C. Disease History ............................................................................................... 40

6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ..............................................95

7 Appendices.............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

B. The General Approach of Survey

D. Data Collecting Technique

Figure 2-1. The Approach in Poultry Sector Survey Study

Table 2-1. Source and Type of Primary Data

Table 2-2. Source and Type of Secondary Data

No Area Information Noted Person in Charge

4) The interview with complete questionnaire (long interview) was to 5

2/ Estimation of Sector 4 Population Number and Density

No. Type of Question Value Range Remarks

No. Type of Question Value Range Remarks

Total Value of the Seven Observed Variables Biosecurity Category

12. Final Reporting

C. Mobilization of Expert Task and Responsibility

To involve in and take responsibility in the development of study instrument as

D. Timeframe of Expert Deployment

5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

B. Poultry Sector Location

b. Population Number, Density, and Composition

Figure 5-1. Poultry Sector Geographical Distribution in Cianjur District

Figure 5-5. Poultry Population of Sector 1 in Mande Sub District

Figure 5-6. Poultry Population Density of Sector 1 in Mande Sub District

Figure 5-7. Poultry Population Density of Sector 2 Farm in Cianjur District

Figure 5-15. Geographical Distribution of Poultry Sector in Bandung District

b. Population Number, Density, and Composition

P oultry D ens ity of S ec tor 2

P oultry D ens ity of S ec tor 3

According to the ventured poultry type, it indicates the sector 3 poultry

Figure 5-24. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Majalaya Sub District

Figure 5-25. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Rancaekek Sub District

Table 5-6 and Figure 5-26.

Poultry Density in Bandung District

Number of Farm AI ND IBD

Number of Farm AI Vaccination ND Vaccination IBD Vaccination

Number of Farm AI Vaccination ND Vaccination IBD Vaccination

E. Production Input and Output Flow

a. Production Input Procurement

b. Production Output Marketing

production volume around 15,00030,000 poultry/hatchery cycle. It was done by 10

Grand Parent Stock

DOC (broiler, layer,

End Consumers Small Traders

a. Production Input Procurement

b. Production Output Marketing

Figure 5-34. Sector 2 Broiler Farms Flow of Production Marketing

a. Production Input Procurement

b. Production Output Marketing

4/ Wet market, Slaughterhouse, and Poultry Collector

F. Sector 4 Farm Profile

Number of Sampling Number of

Bandung Good 0 0.0

Category of Biosecurity Number of

Average number of poultry owned per farmer

The estimation of sector 4 poultry population in each sub district can be

6/ Avian Influenza (AI) Vaccination Status

7/ Production Input and Output Flow

Table 5-26. Sources of Duck Seed for Sector 4 Farms

Table 5-28. Sources of Bird Seed for Sector 4 farms

G. Total Poultry Population Number and Density

Population per Sector Sector 4 Total