Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tuning element (the pin) which is placed over the resonator, and ,..----i-- --i-----1 - - S2 1
is conductively connected with the top of an enclosed cavity. - - S ll
60 ':;----:",,----...lL:f;:-----;:':;----!:---:f;:---'---':-':----'
2.2 2.4
Frequency [GHz]
, ,
I
,T-----
I I
and insertion loss at the band edges is l.2 dB. The bandwidth
,I ,
, I
, I
, ,
, I
, ,
, I
, I
,
,I ,
, I
, I
, ,
, I
, ,
, I
, I
, of new structure at S 11 = -10 dB is 40 MHz (2.81 - 2.85 GHz)
.30 L-_L----'_---'_---'._---'._--'-_--"-_--'-_--'--_...J
2 U U U U U ~ II il and insertion loss at the band edges is 1.1 dB. A sufficient
Frequency [GHz] value of slope of the transmission characteristic is one of the
most important properties of the duplexer because provides
Figure 3. S-parameters of an optimized simulation model sufficient isolation between two independent frequency bands.
For this reason, the newly proposed structure it is left for the
With the aim of achieving a greater slope of transmission proposal of partial bandpass filters.
characteristics S21, a more sensible tuning of resonance
frequency the second structure of a cavity resonator was TABLE T. DIMENSIONS OF A NEWLY DESIGNED AND A PREVIOUS
designed. This structure has larger dimensions than the STRUCTURE
previous model. The height of the resonator is approximately
half of the wavelength. Compared to the previous model this New structure Initial structure
resonator is partially hollow (Fig. 4), thus increasing the Parameter Value [mm] Value [mm
sensitivity of the mechanical tuning of a resonance frequency. Diameter of a cavity 66,1 41
The diameter of the resonator was experimentally chosen 2.5
times smaller than the diameter of the cavity. The value of Height of a structure 72 40
insertion loss of the newly proposed structure is, on the central Height of a resonator 58 20
frequency, equal to 0.016 dB and the value of the reflection Height of a pin 12,1 8
coefficient SII is equal to -25.78 dB (Fig. 5). Diameter of a pin 5,6 8
S2 1
Frequency [GHz]
Figure 4. Simulation model of the newly designed coaxial cavity resonator Figure 6. Comparison of the transmission characteristics
- - 521
- - 5 11
-10
-20
~
-30
~ ~
~ w
>
W -40 .3 -80
>
III
...J
-50
-100
-60
, , , , , ,
-70 -120 ---- ~ - ---- --- ---:-- ------ ---:- ------ - -+ ---- ---- ~ ----- ---~-- ----- --
-80
-140 ---- --------------------------------- --------- ---------- ---------
~~ v ~~ ~ ~~ u ~~
Frequency [GHz]
Frequency [GHz]
Figure 8. S-parameters of an optimized simulation model of bandpass filter Figure 10. S-parameters ot the tmal model ot trequency duplexer
REFERENCES