(

H0-05 A 1672-9382(2008) 06-0020-05

1
121







500
1050

1898

53



Vol.5 No.6 (General Serial No.26)

20
()

Nov. 2008

E - m a i l :
jgwgq@pku.edu. 2 19
cn
L C

20

4

(C h i n e s e p h i l o l o g y )

5 6 26
200811
(general linguistics)
( )




(
1985/194316)

() ()









()
(
1983/189813)(
)(
)






()

(1) ()
(2 ) (

)

[] (193693)




2

(1996264)

21

(1962126)
() (19871)
1979
()





(19835-6)

1982




1979



(1979: 53)
(1982: 23-32)


(2003: 126)(2003)


1 9 8 0

3




(1983/1980: 1)
(1985: iii-iv)


(: 2)
1985


Vol.5 No.6 (General Serial No.26)

(1985: 4)


Nov. 2008

(
1986 : 74)
L C

22


(Beyond sentence
grammar: Studies in Chinese discourse)

5 6 26
200811
(preliminaries)

(234-244)

1982


(20083) van Dijk

(186)Longacre
()
7

(189)


/
(36) ()5

5

(20085)
()

(16)
S1

S2

(4)

S3
()(18)

S4 S5

1978 20



B e a u g r a n d eD r e s s l e r
BrownYule
HallidayHasan
van Dijk(macrostructure)
Longacre 4

(1992201)

23


discourse,
,
Halliday
Complementarities in Language( ,
) , ,


, ,
,


Halliday , ,

,
, ,
Complementarities,


21
[1] Halliday, M. A. K . Complementarities in
Language () [M]. :
, 2008.
[2] . [J ].
, 1997(3): 1-11.
[3] . [M]. :
, , 1987.
[4] . [ M ] . : ,
, , 1962.
[5] . [J ].
, 2003(3): 12-18.
[6] . [J]. ,
, 2007(5): 20-27.
(, 1995 [1981/2]: 72) [7] . [A].
, , () . : ,
(, 2006: 473) 1936.
, , , [8] . [M]. :
, , 1996.
, [9] . [M]. :
, , 1992.
[10] . ()[M]. :
Vol.5 No.6 (General Serial No.26)

, 1962.
[11] , . [M]. :
, 1995 [1981/2].
[12] . [M]. :
Nov. 2008

, , 1979.
(1997), , (2003) [13] . [A]. :
, 1983.
L C

, (32)
F

24
 [22] . and Integrating these two fields often discussed in
[M]. : the academic circles are of dialectical unity, with the
, 2007b. former as the basis and the latter as its development.
[23] . We, the scholars in the foreign language circles
[J]. , 2006, (1): 4-5 should not only introduce advanced theories abroad,
[24] . but also combine them with the Chinese situation
[ J ] . , and linguistic theories, thus advancing along the
2007, (1). road of nativizational and integrated originaltiy.
[25] . [A]. The comparison and contrast between Chinese
. [C]. : and English should be made both at the level of
, 2006. language facts and at the level of linguistic theories,
[26] . [J]. especially the semantic theory, which may be a new
, 2008(1): 23-26. growth of linguistic studies as well. This paper also
[27] . takes Linguistic Embodiment and Metaphorical
[J]. , 2007(1): 45-50. Cognitive Theory as examples for the exhibition
[28] . [M]. : of our ancestors theories many years ago. So we
, 2000. should fix our attention not only to the western,
but also to our ancestors contributions. It is highly
The Fifth Paper on New Growth of necessary for us to strengthen our cooperation with
Linguistics: Originality of Nativization and the scholars from the Chinese circles with a view to
Integration broaden our research scope.
Linguistic Embodiment and Metaphorical Key Words: Cognitive Linguistics; Embodied
Cognitive Theories as Examples Philosophy; integrating Western and Chinese; new
Abstract: Making the western serve the Chinese growth

(24) [24] . [ M ] . : ,
[14] . [ A ] . 1985.
. : ,
1987. The Integration Perspective and Chinese
[15] . [M]. : , 1986. Linguistics
[16] . [ M ] . : , Abstract: This paper addresses the relation between
1983 [1898]. the integration perspective and the linguistic
[17] . [M]. : , research in China. The author first argues that the
1985 [1943]. linguistic research in China has been characterized
[18] . [A]. by the integration perspective. Then he goes on to
() discuss in some detail the integration endeavor as
[C]. 2003: 138-154. seen in Mas Grammar. The third section is devoted
[19] . [M]. : to three latest attempts to integrate the Chinese
, 2008. tradition and the Western tradition, namely, the
[20] . [C]. phrase-based theory, the sinogram-based theory,
: , 2003. and discourse studies. The author believes that
Vol.5 No.6 (General Serial No.26)

[21] . () [M]. integration and subdivision are two complementary

: , 2006. perspectives, each has its strong points and
[22] . 1982[J ]. weaknesses, and both are indispensable.
, 1998(1): 28-32. Key Words: integration; Chinese linguistics;
Nov. 2008

[23] . [A]. phrase-based theory; sinogram-based theory;

. : , 1983. discourse studies
L C
F

32