Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005
37 5 Foreign Language T eaching and Research ( bimonthly) Vol. 37 No. 5
: ,
,
,
- ,
:
[ ] H030 [ ] A [ ] 1000- 0429( 2005) 05-0343- 8
1. 2.
,
, ,
,
,
,
,
; ,
( 1996) ,
(
) , ,
, ;
, Rosch
,
( protot ype t heory ) ,
, , ,
,
,
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
, , / 0
/ 0 , ( pragm at ic triggers)
, ,
,
, ;
:
, , ( 1) , N BA
, , ( 2) ,
,
, / 0/ 0 ,
,
3. ,
( 1) / 0
( lex ical pragmatics) NBA
, / 0; ( 2) /
( Blut ner 1998) , 0,
(
,
)
,
,
,
;
,
,
, ,
,
Wilson( 2003; 2004a, b) ,
, ,
,
, , ,
,
,
, ,
,
( ) , , ,
, Carston
( 1996, 2002b) , Wilson ( 2003) ,
, ,
# 344 #
,
, ,
, , ( 4a) - ( 4d) / 0,
,
, 5 6 ( 2002:
, , 802) / 0: a.
( 2005) ; b. ; c.
; d. ; e.
4.
, ( 4a) -
( 4d) , ( 4a)
, / 0 ( a) , ( 4b)
- ( 4d) / 0 ,
, , ( 4b)
/ 0 ( prag mat ic enrich- ( 4d) , ( 4c)
ment ) ,
,
:
4. 1
( 5) a. ,
b.
,
,
c. ,
, ( 6) a.
, b. ,
,
, c.
/ 0 ( 7) a. ,
/ 0( 56, 2002: b.
c. , !
215) , , ,
, , / 0
( 5) - ( 7) / 0 / 0
,
:
( 3) a. ,
,
b. , ( 5a) ( 6a) ( 7a) /
c. / 0
0 / 0,
( 4) a. , ,
b.
c. ,
d. ,
, ,
( 3a) - ( 3c) / 0 , , ( 8a)
, , / 0/ 0,
# 345 #
2005 5
, :
( 8) a.
b.
, :
? 4. 2
? ? ,
:
? , ,
, ,
,
,
,
, ( 10- 11)
( Cruse 2000) ( 12- 13) ,
,
, L evinson( 2000) ,
,
( 10) T hey all like to play wit h the bald man.
, Wilson( 2003) Levinson ( 11) F rance is hex agonal .
,
( 12) ,
( 13)
:
,
,
:
,
( 14) ,
,
( 15) ,
( 14) / 0
# 346 #
, , ( 21)
( 22) ,
, ,
, ( 19) / Vietnam0 6070
, , ; ( 20)
; / Roger F ederer0 Peter
, / 120/ 0, Sampras , Sampras
, ; , ( 21) / 0
, / 120, , ;
( 22) / 0 ,
, , / Viet-
/ Sampras0
nam0 / 0/ 0
,
,
,
:
( 16) 2000 ,
( 17) , 8
!
( 18) , /
( 16) , / 2000 0 2000 0,
2000 , ; ( 17) /
,
0 , , ,
; ( 18) / 0, :
,
,
,
,
5.
,
,
, ,
,
, ,
/ 0, : , ,
( 19 ) I raq didnpt become V ietnam during the G ulf
,
w ar . ,
# 347 #
2005 5
,
( ) , ,
, ; , ,
,
, ,
, ,
- ,
( Sperber & Wilson 1995; ,
Carst on 2002b; Wilson & Sperber 2004) , ,
:
, Grice
, ,
, ( 23a) ,
( 23b) , ( 23b) ,
( 23c) , Grice , ( 23b) ,
, Sperber & Wilson Carst on , ,
( 23b) , ,
( 23c) ,
, ,
( 23) a.
b.
c.
,
, , ,
,
, ; ,
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
, ,
Carston ( 1996, 2002a, 2002b) Wilson ,
( 2003, 2004b) ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
, ,
; , , /
# 348 #
0/ 0 , ,
,
, ,
,
, / 0 , ,
, ,
/ 0, ,
, , , ,
/ 0 ,
, ,
,
, Grice 6.
:
, , , , ,
,
, ,
,
, ( )
,
, ,
,
; ,
Blutner, R. 1998. Lex ical Pr ag matics [ J] . Jour nal of
,
Semantics 15: 115- 162.
, Carston, R. 1996. Enrichment and loosening: Comple-
: mentary pr ocesses in deriving the proposit ion ex-
2006 10 ,
,
( 1. ; 2.
; 3. ; 4. ; 5.
; 6. ; 7. ; 8.
[
] )
( 1. ; 2. ; 3.
; 4. ; 5. ; 6.
)
( 1. ; 2. ; 3.
; 4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7.
; 8. ; 9. )
, ( A 4 , 5 , 1. 5) 5 2006 4 10
: ( 264005, 0535) 6902006( O ) , 6902956( h) ,
13791246110) , ( 0535- 6902716, E- mail: g race- 725@ 163. com) 2006 5
# 350 #
2005 9 ( ) Sept. 2005
37 5 For eign L anguage T eaching and Research ( bimonthly) Vol. 37 No. 5
Native and nonnative judgements of Chinese learnersp English public speaking ability, by Wen Qiuf ang , L iu X iang-
dong & Jin Limin, p. 337
T his paper r eports a study on the differences in nativ e and nonnative judg ements of Chinese co ntestantsp performances
in an English speaking contest. T he data for analysis w as from the Semi_final of 2004 / CCT V Cup0 Eng lish Speaking
Contest in w hich there were 96 contestants and 11 judges, including five nat ive speakers and six nonnat ive speakers. T he
native judges ar e expatr iates teaching Eng lish in Chinese tertiary institut ions while the nonnative judges are English profes-
sors whose mother tongue is Chinese. T he results show that native and nonnative judges did sho w significant differ ences in
t heir average scores for the 96 contestants. However, such differences did not affect the outcome of the contest concerning
75% of the semi_final w inners. F or the remaining 25% o f the semi_final w inners upon w hom native and nonnative judg es
disagr eed, nat ive judgments w eighed more than nonnative ones. T he interview ing data indicated that nativ e and nonnative
judg es differed principally in how they r ated t he linguistic fo rms and the content of the contestantsp performance.
Lexical pragmatics and pragmatic enrichment of word meaning, by Ran Yongp ing , p. 343
As a subdivision of pragmatics, lexical pragmatics aims at giv ing a systematic account of phenomena that are connect-
ed w ith t he semantic underspecificat ion of wor ds or ex pressio ns. T heir linguistically_encoded or prototypical meanings are
found inadequate in utterance interpretation, thus such meanings need to be narrow ed in a mo re restr icted sense or broad-
ened approx imately as well as metaphorically in a more general sense unt il their optimal relevance is satisfied in contex t.
The principle of goal and analysis of discourse coherence ) A new approach to the study of discourse coherence, by
L iao Meiz hen, p. 351
T he literatur e on co hesion and coher ence is imposing both at home and abr oad, w hich is character ized by persistent
pursuit of new cohesive devices to explain co herence. T he present paper is ex clusively devoted to coherence. Guided by the
principle o f goal_directio n in human act ion, the paper takes the goal as the only criterion for coherence of texts or discourse
and proposes goal analysis as a fr esh approach to the study of coherence.