You are on page 1of 9

2005 9 ( ) Sept.

2005
37 5 Foreign Language T eaching and Research ( bimonthly) Vol. 37 No. 5

: ,
,
,
- ,
:

[ ] H030 [ ] A [ ] 1000- 0429( 2005) 05-0343- 8

1. 2.

,
, ,

,
,
,
,
; ,
( 1996) ,
(

) , ,
, ;
, Rosch
,
( protot ype t heory ) ,
, , ,
,
,
, ,
,

, ,
, ,
, , / 0

X ( U CL) Deirdre Wilson / 0


( 2004 12 , ) ,
# 343 #
2005 5

/ 0 , ( pragm at ic triggers)
, ,

,
, ;
:
, , ( 1) , N BA

, , ( 2) ,
,

, / 0/ 0 ,
,

3. ,
( 1) / 0

( lex ical pragmatics) NBA
, / 0; ( 2) /
( Blut ner 1998) , 0,
(
,
)
,
,
,
;
,
,
, ,

,
Wilson( 2003; 2004a, b) ,
, ,


,
, , ,
,
,
, ,

,
( ) , , ,
, Carston


( 1996, 2002b) , Wilson ( 2003) ,
, ,

# 344 #

,
, ,
, , ( 4a) - ( 4d) / 0,
,
, 5 6 ( 2002:
, , 802) / 0: a.
( 2005) ; b. ; c.

; d. ; e.
4.
, ( 4a) -
( 4d) , ( 4a)
, / 0 ( a) , ( 4b)
- ( 4d) / 0 ,
, , ( 4b)
/ 0 ( prag mat ic enrich- ( 4d) , ( 4c)
ment ) ,

,
:
4. 1
( 5) a. ,

b.
,
,
c. ,
, ( 6) a.
, b. ,
,
, c.

/ 0 ( 7) a. ,

/ 0( 56, 2002: b.
c. , !
215) , , ,
, , / 0
( 5) - ( 7) / 0 / 0
,

:

( 3) a. ,
,
b. , ( 5a) ( 6a) ( 7a) /
c. / 0
0 / 0,
( 4) a. , ,
b.
c. ,
d. ,
, ,
( 3a) - ( 3c) / 0 , , ( 8a)
, , / 0/ 0,
# 345 #
2005 5

, :

( 8) a.

b.

, :

? 4. 2
? ? ,
:

? , ,
, ,
,

,
,
, ( 10- 11)
( Cruse 2000) ( 12- 13) ,
,
, L evinson( 2000) ,
,
( 10) T hey all like to play wit h the bald man.
, Wilson( 2003) Levinson ( 11) F rance is hex agonal .

,
( 12) ,
( 13)
:

( 9) a. As I worked in the garden, a bird perched o n


/ bald0, / hexagonal0, / 0
my spade. / 0
b. Bir ds w heeled above the waves. ,
c. A bird , high in the sky, invisible, sang its pure ( ) ( 10) / bald0
song . ( 11) / hexagonal0
d. A t Christmas, the bird was delicious. 30 ,
, / bird0 ; ( 12) ,
,

( 9a) , ( 9b) , ( 9c) ,



; ( 13)

, ( 9d) ,
, , ,

,
,
:
,
( 14) ,
,
( 15) ,

( 14) / 0
# 346 #

; ( 15) / 0 ( 20) Rog er F ederer is the next Samp r as .

, , ( 21)
( 22) ,


, ,
, ( 19) / Vietnam0 6070
, , ; ( 20)
; / Roger F ederer0 Peter
, / 120/ 0, Sampras , Sampras
, ; , ( 21) / 0
, / 120, , ;
( 22) / 0 ,
, , / Viet-
/ Sampras0
nam0 / 0/ 0
,
,
,
:
( 16) 2000 ,
( 17) , 8
!
( 18) , /
( 16) , / 2000 0 2000 0,
2000 , ; ( 17) /
,
0 , , ,

; ( 18) / 0, :
,

,

,

,

5.
,


,
, ,

,

, ,
/ 0, : , ,
( 19 ) I raq didnpt become V ietnam during the G ulf
,
w ar . ,
# 347 #
2005 5

,
( ) , ,
, ; , ,

,
, ,
, ,
- ,
( Sperber & Wilson 1995; ,
Carst on 2002b; Wilson & Sperber 2004) , ,
:
, Grice

, ,
, ( 23a) ,
( 23b) , ( 23b) ,
( 23c) , Grice , ( 23b) ,
, Sperber & Wilson Carst on , ,
( 23b) , ,
( 23c) ,
, ,
( 23) a.

b.

c.
,
, , ,
,

, ; ,

, ,
,

, ,
, ,
, ,
Carston ( 1996, 2002a, 2002b) Wilson ,
( 2003, 2004b) ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
,

,
, ,


; , , /
# 348 #

0/ 0 , ,
,
, ,

,
, / 0 , ,
, ,
/ 0, ,
, , , ,
/ 0 ,
, ,
,
, Grice 6.
:
, , , , ,
,
, ,
,
, ( )
,

, ,

,
; ,
Blutner, R. 1998. Lex ical Pr ag matics [ J] . Jour nal of
,
Semantics 15: 115- 162.
, Carston, R. 1996. Enrichment and loosening: Comple-
: mentary pr ocesses in deriving the proposit ion ex-

( 24) ! pressed? [ J] . UCL Wor king Pap ers in Linguistics


8: 205- 232.
/ 0, Carston, R . 2002a. L inguistic meaning, communicated
, , meaning and cognitive pragmatics [ J] . M ind and
, L anguage 17/ 1 & 2: 127- 148.
, / 0 Carston, R . 2002b. T houghts and Utter ances [ M ] . Ox-
ford: Blackw ell.

, , Cruse, D. A. 2000. M eaning in L anguage [ M ] . Ox-


ford: Oxford U niv ersity Pr ess.
, / 0
Horn, L . R . & G . Ward. 2004. H and book of Pr agmat-
/
, / 0
ics [ C] . Ox ford: Blackw ell.
/ 0
0 / L ev inson, S. 2000. Pr esump tive M eanings : T he T heor y
0 of Gener aliz ed Conver sational I mp licatur e [ M ] .
, Cambridg e, M A. : M IT P ress.
, Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance : Co mmu-
# 349 #
2005 5

nication and Cognition [ M ] . Ox ford: Blackw ell. , 2002b, [ J] , 5 6 4


Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance and lexical pragmatics [ J] .
I talian Jour nal of L inguistics/ Rivis ta di Linguisti- , 2004, 5 :
ca 15/ 2: 273- 291. 6( Semantics and Pr agmatics: M eaning in Lan-
Wilson, D. 2004a. N ew dir ections f or r esear ch on p r ag- guage and D iscour se) [ A ] :
matics and modularity [ C] . Proceedings of t he A-
thens confer ence on Review ing L inguistic T hought: , 2005, [ J] ,5 6
Perspectives into the 21st Centur y.
Wilson, D. 2004b. Relev ance, w ord meaning and com- , 1996, 5 6 ( ) [ M ]
munication: T he past, present and futur e of lexical :
pragmatics [ J] . M oder n For eign L anguages 103/ 1:
1- 13. : 2004 ) 11 ) 10;
Wilson, D. & D. Sper ber. 2004. Relevance theory , 2005) 6 ) 11;
[A ] . In L . R. Horn & G. Ward ( eds. ) . T he : 2005) 7 ) 11
H andbook of Pr agmatics [ C] . Ox ford: Blackw ell. : 510420
, 2002a, [ J] , 5
6 1

2006 10 ,
,
( 1. ; 2.
; 3. ; 4. ; 5.
; 6. ; 7. ; 8.
[



] )
( 1. ; 2. ; 3.
; 4. ; 5. ; 6.
)
( 1. ; 2. ; 3.
; 4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7.
; 8. ; 9. )

, ( A 4 , 5 , 1. 5) 5 2006 4 10
: ( 264005, 0535) 6902006( O ) , 6902956( h) ,
13791246110) , ( 0535- 6902716, E- mail: g race- 725@ 163. com) 2006 5


# 350 #
2005 9 ( ) Sept. 2005
37 5 For eign L anguage T eaching and Research ( bimonthly) Vol. 37 No. 5

Abstracts of major papers in this issue

On empirical research in intercultural communication, by H u Wenz hong, p. 323


Intercultural communication studies have scor ed gr eat prog ress in China since they w ere introduced in t he early eight-
ies of the last century . O ver 30 monographs and textbooks have been published and more than 2, 000 art icles hav e ap-
peared in academic journals. An increasing number of co lleges and universities now offer inter cultural communication as a
r equired or optional course. However, empir ical research has been fairly weak. A comparison is made between ar ticles
published in Chinese journals and those published in the I nter national Jour nal of I ntercultur al Relations for the period
1999- 2002. It is found that while articles based on empirical r esearch pr edominate in IJI R , only a very small percentage
of articles in Chinese journals are data_driven. It is urged that more empirical research should be done in the future.

Native and nonnative judgements of Chinese learnersp English public speaking ability, by Wen Qiuf ang , L iu X iang-
dong & Jin Limin, p. 337
T his paper r eports a study on the differences in nativ e and nonnative judg ements of Chinese co ntestantsp performances
in an English speaking contest. T he data for analysis w as from the Semi_final of 2004 / CCT V Cup0 Eng lish Speaking
Contest in w hich there were 96 contestants and 11 judges, including five nat ive speakers and six nonnat ive speakers. T he
native judges ar e expatr iates teaching Eng lish in Chinese tertiary institut ions while the nonnative judges are English profes-
sors whose mother tongue is Chinese. T he results show that native and nonnative judges did sho w significant differ ences in
t heir average scores for the 96 contestants. However, such differences did not affect the outcome of the contest concerning
75% of the semi_final w inners. F or the remaining 25% o f the semi_final w inners upon w hom native and nonnative judg es
disagr eed, nat ive judgments w eighed more than nonnative ones. T he interview ing data indicated that nativ e and nonnative
judg es differed principally in how they r ated t he linguistic fo rms and the content of the contestantsp performance.

Lexical pragmatics and pragmatic enrichment of word meaning, by Ran Yongp ing , p. 343
As a subdivision of pragmatics, lexical pragmatics aims at giv ing a systematic account of phenomena that are connect-
ed w ith t he semantic underspecificat ion of wor ds or ex pressio ns. T heir linguistically_encoded or prototypical meanings are
found inadequate in utterance interpretation, thus such meanings need to be narrow ed in a mo re restr icted sense or broad-
ened approx imately as well as metaphorically in a more general sense unt il their optimal relevance is satisfied in contex t.

The principle of goal and analysis of discourse coherence ) A new approach to the study of discourse coherence, by
L iao Meiz hen, p. 351
T he literatur e on co hesion and coher ence is imposing both at home and abr oad, w hich is character ized by persistent
pursuit of new cohesive devices to explain co herence. T he present paper is ex clusively devoted to coherence. Guided by the
principle o f goal_directio n in human act ion, the paper takes the goal as the only criterion for coherence of texts or discourse
and proposes goal analysis as a fr esh approach to the study of coherence.

van Dijkps perspective of discourse, by Xu Jiuj iu , p. 358


Based on his compr ehensive r esearch on discourse for more than several decades, van Dijk has conceptualized his sys-
tematic understanding of discourse in his wor ks, which ex erts a very impor tant impact in the field. T his paper summarizes
t he components of v an Dijkps concept of discourse fr om the following 7 aspects: 1) concept of discourse, 2) discourse
# 400 #

You might also like