Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
IMPACT OF MICRO FINANCE INSTITUTIONS ON WOMEN
EMPOWERMENT IN ZAMBIA
By Mutale Tricia Bwalya
BackgroundInformation
MicroFinanceInstitutions(MFIs)areorganizationswhich
wereoriginallysetupinordertohelpfinancethosesmall
scalemicroenterprisesandlocaleconomicactivitieswhich
werelargelyexcludedfromformalfinanceandmainstream
bankingpractice.However,inSubSaharanAfrica,micro
financeisnotyetwidespreadandmostlowincomeearners,
includingmanyofthepoor,cannotaccessfinancialservices
(CGAP, 2009; Spencer & Wood, 2005) while poverty is
officiallywidespreadandacute(WorldBank,2009).
1.2StatementoftheProblem
IthasbeenhypothisedthatmicroFinanceInstitutionsare
ineffectiveinempoweringwomeninZambia.
LITERATUREREVIEW
The roles that men and women play in society are not
biologically determined they are socially determined,
changingandchangeable.Althoughtheymaybejustifiedas
beingrequiredbycultureorreligion,theserolesvarywidely
bylocalityandchangeovertime.GirlGuideAssociationhas
foundthatapplyingculturallysensitiveapproachescanbe
keytoadvancingwomensrightswhilerespectingdifferent
formsofsocialorganization.
Empowermentofwomenhasbeenidentifiedasavaluable
attribute,onethatisessentialtotheeffectivefunctioningof
an organization (Palmier, 1998). Theoretical discussions
about structural power and its relationship to the
developmentofempowermentinemployeesareabundantin
theliterature(Kanter,1993;Kluska,LaschingerSpence&
Kerr, 2004; Sui, Laschinger & Vingilis, 2006).
Empowerment has also been shown to be essential to the
goalsandoutcomesofsharedgovernancemodels(Anthony,
2004; Erickson, Hamilton, Jones & Ditomassi, 2003).
Empowermentisevidencedbyorganizationalmemberswho
are inspired and motivated to make meaningful
contributions and who have the confidence that their
contributionswillberecognizedandvalued.
ImpactoflackofwomenEmpowermentinZambia
ThethirdMillenniumDevelopmentGoal(MDG),promoting
genderequalityandtheempowermentofwomen,hasgiven
prominencetorecenteffortstotargetgenderedpoverty.
Genderedpovertyistherecognitionthatwomenandmen
facepovertyfordifferentreasonsandbothexperienceand
respondtoitdifferently.
Studieshaverevealedthattheindicatorsofeducationand
literacy,themetricsusedtomeasureprogresstowardsMDG
3, do not sufficiently capture gendered poverty or gender
disparities.Therearemanyotherfactorsthatinfluencethe
statusofwomen,suchasincome,reproductivehealthand
environmental and socio cultural constraints. Bradshaw
andLingerer(2003,inChant,2003)listthreefactorsthat
contribute to the relative poverty of women: (1) women
generallyhavefeweropportunitiestotransformworkinto
income, (2) women still have limited decisionmaking
authority,and(3)whenwomenactuallydomakedecisions,
theytendtoactforthebenefitofothersfirst.
MicrofinanceinaZambianContext
Zambian MFIs donor dependence (Bateman,2010) has
potentially serious implications. For example, Musona
(2002),Chiumya(2006),andDixonetal(2007)revealhow
relativelyhighoperatingcosts,delinquencyanddefault,low
client intake/retention, potential fraud, and high staff
turnoverimpedesustainability,andmuchvauntedoutreach
levels have been lagging behind East Africa for example.
Thishighdependenceondonorfundsthatcanbefoundin
many sectors in Zambia is particularly damaging in
microfinance, where financial sustainability is of
fundamentalimportance.
ZambianMFIsmightpotentiallyprovidemuchneeded,but
hithertoscarce,financialservicesinacountrywhere,even
by prevailing standards, access remains extremely low
(FinScope,2010;MattooandPayton,2007).TheAssociation
of Microfinance Institutions of Zambia (AMIZ) has
estimated that the industrys outreach is in the region of
250,000to300,000activeborrowers(largelyduetoaninflux
of new consumption based MFIs). 19 out of 25 licensed
MFIsfoundedinthelast5yearshaveindeedbeenexpressly
consumerlendingbased.SincetheseMFIsdonotemphasize
small scale enterprise development they simply require
formal employment before making a loan. However, an
estimated60,000borrowersoccupythesameenterpriseloan
marketnicheinwhichPZoperated.Additionally,thescope
of services has also been particularly limited, with little
savings mobilization to date (Dixon, Ritchie, & Siwale,
2006).
Thelawhoweverhaschangedfollowingthe2006Banking
and Financial Services (microfinance) Regulations Act
whichhasenabledMFIstomobilizefurtherpublicdeposits
and savings. According to BOZ out of 25 licensed
institutionshavebeengranteddeposittakinglicenses.More
importantly,theActhasestablishedgovernancerulesand
formalaccountabilitychannelswiththecentralbank,sothat
MFIsmightevolveintolimitedcompanieswithidentifiable
shareholders(AMIZmagazine,June2010).However,there
is as yet little serious empirical study of Zambian
microfinance, where institutional performance data is still
considered proprietary, and remains difficult to access
MicroFinance.Enhanceddisclosuremightrevealmorebut,
so far, the few impact studies have concentrated upon
CETZAM (Cheston, et al., 2000; Copestake et al. 2001;
Copestake, 2002), except for Copestake, Bhalotra and
Johnsons (1998) study of the PeriUrban Lusaka Small
Enterprise (PULSE). No similar impact studies have been
conductedonMicroFinanceinstitutions.
METHODOLOGY
StudyDesign
Samplesize
Thesamplesizewillcompriseof50respondentsthatwill
comprise of 40 Women running micro finance businesses,
FINCAfieldOfficersandManagementmembers.
TargetPopulation
TheresearchintendstocoverWomenwhowillbecurrently
beneficiaries of FINCA Loans, FINCA Field Officers and
StaffmembersinKabwe,Zambia.
DataCollection
Bothprimaryandsecondarydatawillbeusedincollecting
information.
DataCollectionInstruments
InterviewGuide
This will cover a wide range of questions on women
empowermentandmicroFinance.Itwillbedesignedand
administeredtothosewhowillbewillingtobeinterviewed
attheirownconvenienttime.
Questionnaires
Itwillbeusedindatacollectionwhereitwillnotbepossible
tomeetalltherespondentsatonepoint.
SamplingProcedures
Thesimplerandomsamplingprocedureswillbeusedinthis
research for its high degree of representatives. In this
particularcase,arotarymethodofsamplingwillsapplies.In
an attempt to choose 40 women from different groups
withoutbias.
DataAnalysis
Analysisofdatawillbedonebyusinggraphs,barcharts
andpiechartsshowingresponsesfromparticipants.
References
Basu,A.,Blavy,R.,&Yulek,M.(2004).Microfinancein
Africa:ExperienceandlessonsfromselectedAfrican
Countries.IMFWorkingPaper.AfricanDepartment,
WP/04/174.
CGAPBrief,December2009.TheRise,Fall,andRecovery
oftheMicrofinanceSectorinMorocco
ChiumyaC,(2006)TheRegulationofMicrofinance
Institutions:AZambianCaseStudy,Universityof
Manchester,UnpublishedPhD
Copestake,J.(2002).Inequalityandthepolarizingimpactof
microcredit:EvidencefromZambiasCopperbelt.Journal
ofInternationalDevelopment,14(6),743755.
Copestake,J.,Bhalotra,S.,&Johnson,S.(2001).Assessing
theimpactofmicrofinance:AZambiancasestudy,Journal
ofDevelopmentStudies,37(4),81100.
Dixon,R.,Ritchie,J.andSiwaleJ.(2007)Loanofficersand
loan delinquency in microfinance: A Zambian case,
AccountingForum31:4771.
Dixon,R.,Ritchie,J.andSiwale,J.(2006)Microfinance:
Accountability from the grassroots, Accounting, Auditing
andAccountabilityJournal19(3):405427.
Eisenhardt,K.(1989),Buildingtheoriesfromcasestudy
research,AcademyofManagementReview,Vol.14No.4,
pp.53250.
Hartaska,V.(2005)GovernanceandPerformanceof
MicrofinanceInstitutionsinCentralandEasternEurope
andtheNewlyIndependentStatesWorldDevelopment,
Vol.33,No.10,pp.16271643
Labie,M.(2001).Corporategovernanceinmicrofinance
organizations:alongandwindingroad.Management
Decision39(4),296301
Law,John(2004).AfterMethod:MessinSocialScience
Research.London,Routledge
McGahan,A.M.andPorter,M.E.(1997).Howmuchdoes
industrymatter,really?StrategicManagementJournal,18,
1530
Mellahi,K(2005)ThedynamicsofBoardsofDirectorsin
FailingOrganizationsLongRangePlanning(38):261279
Mellahi,KandWilkinson,A(2010)ManagingandCoping
withOrganizationalFailure:IntroductiontotheSpecial
IssueGroupandOrganizationManagement,35(5)531541
Mellahi,K.,andWilkinson,A.(2004).Organizational
failure:Acritiqueofrecentresearchandaproposed
integrativeframework.InternationalJournalof
ManagementReviews,5/6(1),2141
Mersland,RandStrom,R(2009)Performanceand
governanceinmicrofinanceinstitutionsJournalofBanking
andFinance33,pp662669
Power,M.(2007).OrganizedUncertainty:Designingaworld
ofriskmanagement.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Pugliese,G,M.(2010).Samegame,differentleague?What
microfinanceinstitutionscanlearnfromthelargebanks
corporategovernancedebateGenevaPaperson
inclusivenessNo.11,October,2010.
PRIDEZambiasNarrativeReport(04Aug1009Mar05)
toSIDA(2004)
Rumelt,R.P.(1991).Howmuchdoesindustrymatter?
StrategicManagementJournal,12,167185
Siwale,J.(2006).Theroleofloanofficersandclientsinthe
diffusionofmicrofinance:AstudyofPRIDEZambiaand
CETZAMinZambia.UniversityofDurham:Unpublished
Ph.D.Thesis.
Spencer,S.,&Wood,A.(2005)Makingthefinancialsector
workforthepoor.JournalofDevelopmentStudies, 41(4),
657675.
Tedlow,R.S.(2008).Leadersindenial.HarvardBusiness
Review,86(7/8),1819
Vaughan,D.(1996),TheChallengerLaunchDecision.
Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress
Yin,R.K.(2003).CaseStudyResearch:DesignandMethods
(3rdEd.).Sagepublication
APPENDIXSECTION
AmastudentattheWomensUniversityinAfrica,Harare,
Zimbabwedoingmyfinalyearproject.Iamconductinga
studyinKabweontheimpactofmicrofinanceinstitutions
onwomenempowermentinKabwe,Zambia.
Youhavebeenrandomlyselectedtoanswerafewquestions
on this topic. Be assured that all responses given will be
treated with utmost confidentiality and privacy. This
exerciseispurelyforacademicpurposes.