+F D E G J IEK L I F H G K

.
-
+

.
*
,

9?@8<:> =5>:C5:8A 5>7 B;8<@ B856;<>:

( 100089)

ESP EGP
ESP EGP ESP EGP

H319 A 1004 6038 2014 01 0001 08

1
1 2011
2013
2002 2007





2012 2011


2012 2
ESP 2 1
EGP


2011 615


2013

2006



1 2013

2




3

+235



04,.035 7-4135
2 3 :

6*35 2/35
2012 49 62

042/35 7-2/35

1 ( 2013: 2)

*.02


-102 4102

3/02 .,02 .+02


2 ( 2013: 16)

4

2013



2 2
2013

2
 +F D E G J IEK L I F H G K
.

-

+
.
*
,
2013
9?@8<:> =5>:C5:8A 5>7 B;8<@ B856;<>:

2010 9 10

3
3

3


20 90








1992 21 22 1992
1

( )



( )

3




( )
2008
survival ; A1 A2 B1
B2 C1 C2 24
(
)



New York Times China Daily
1992
20 48
A1 A2 4
1 B1B2



1
2008 25
25




B2








B1

4









2009
2012
4 1 :






2013

4
 +F D E G J IEK L I F H G K
.

-

2008 6
+
.
*
,
4 2 :
9?@8<:> =5>:C5:8A 5>7 B;8<@ B856;<>:

2

2

5















2013 12 30




4 3 :
13



2013
5 English for academ-
ic purposes EAP
1
2 3
4
2013 6

2009

17 5 630


Foong
2005
Vallance
6 7 26

700
6 150 Hu
2007

3 5

4 4 :

6
 +F D E G J IEK L I F H G K
.

-

+
.
*
, 2000 2002
2005 2005 3
9?@8<:> =5>:C5:8A 5>7 B;8<@ B856;<>:

telling testing




4 5 :









7 3

+ + +
+ +

+
+ + +

+
8
9

4

4


C1

2008

4
2012
2013
+ + 17
+ 2009
+

2013



8
6 2002 J
4
1 78 80

7 1992 J
1 21 22
8 2008

2013 M
9 2005 J
6 105 108
5
10 2012
J 3 69 74
11 2013
5 13 18
J

12 2013
M

13 2009

J 6 23 29
14 2011
J 5 1 5
15 2013 J

6 9 13
16 2013 J

5 4 10
17 2008
J 3 3 5
18 2012
J 2 283 292
19 2013

J 6 14 21

20 2010

J 5 9 13

21 2013

2013 12 31

OL http / / news xinhuanet com / poli-

tics /2013 12 /31 / c_118788013 htm accessed 12 /31 /2013

22 2011

J 1 9 14

Abstract One of the most controversial debate topics in
current College English teaching is w hether EGP should
be replaced by ESP This paper focuses on the major
1FoongK M Vallance 2005 Teaching English to Chinese difference betw een tw o contrasting view s i e ESP only
ESL Students Classroom PracticesM Singapore Pearson vs EGP plus ESP in this debate It consists of three sec-
Education tions Section One analyzes the major misunderstanding
2HuG2007 Developing an EAP w riting course for Chinese
in the view of ESP onlyi e EGP being regarded as basic
ESL studentsJ ELC Journal 38 67 86
English Section Tw o explains w hy EGP and ESP should
3 2009 J
be provided at the same time by all universities for
3 82 85
students to select according to their needs Section Three
4 2011
illustrates how to provide EGP and ESP together in Col-
J 4
609 617 lege English teaching in terms of principles and practice
5 2012 M Key Words College English EGP ESP EAP