You are on page 1of 7

MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS 50:136142 (2011)

Circulating MicroRNAs, miR-21, miR-122, and


miR-223, in Patients With Hepatocellular
Carcinoma or Chronic Hepatitis
Jian Xu,1 Chen Wu,1 Xu Che,2 Li Wang,3 Dianke Yu,1 Tongwen Zhang,1 Liming Huang,1 Hui Li,3 Wen Tan,1
Chengfeng Wang,2** and Dongxin Lin1*
1
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and
Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
2
Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and
Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
3
Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and
Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

Numerous studies have shown that aberrant microRNA (miRNA) expression is associated with the development and
progression of various types of human cancer and serum miRNAs are potential biomarkers. This study examined
whether some commonly deregulated miRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are presented in serum of patients
with HCC and can serve as diagnostic markers. Serum miRNAs (miR-21, miR-122, and miR-223) were quantified by
real-time quantitative RT-PCR in 101 patients with HCC and 89 healthy controls. In addition, 48 patients with chronic
type B hepatitis were also analyzed for comparison. We found that the median levels of miR-21, miR-122, and miR-
223 were significantly higher in patients with HCC than those in healthy controls (P 7.48  1013, P 6.93  109,
and P 3.90  1012, respectively). However, these elevated serum miRNAs were also detected in patients with
chronic hepatitis (P 2.05  1012, P 4.52  1016, and P 1.65  1011, respectively). Moreover, serum miR-21
and miR-122 in patients with chronic hepatitis were higher than in patients with HCC (P 3.99  104 and
P 4.97  108), although no such significant difference was found for miR-223. Receiver-operator characteristic
(ROC) curve analyses suggest that these serum miRNAs may be useful markers for discriminating patients with HCC
or chronic hepatitis from healthy controls, but not patients with HCC from patients with chronic hepatitis. Our
results indicate that serum miR-21, miR-122 and miR-223 are elevated in patients with HCC or chronic hepatitis
and these miRNAs have strong potential to serve as novel biomarkers for liver injury but not specifically for HCC.
2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Key words: miRNA; hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatitis; serum

INTRODUCTION great research interest. Numerous studies have


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most shown that aberrant miRNA expression is associated
common cancer worldwide in terms of numbers of with the development and progression of various
cases and the third most common cause of cancer types of human cancer [37]. The published studies
death because of its poor prognosis [1]. It has been demonstrated an alteration of miRNAs expression
well known that infection with hepatitis B and C profiles in primary HCC compared with normal liver
virus (HBV and HCV) is the major etiological factor tissue. It has been shown that among the deregulated
for the development of HCC. Currently, there are no miRNAs in HBV-related HCC, miR-10b, miR-18,
reliable biomarkers for early detection of primary
HCC and most patients with primary HCC are Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online
diagnosed at advanced stages, which is associated version of this article.
Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HBV, hepatitis B
with poor prognosis and low survival rate of the virus; miRNA, microRNA; Ct, cycle threshold; ROC, receiver-operator
disease. a-Fetoprotein (a-AFP) has mainly been used characteristic.
in clinic for diagnosis of primary HCC; however, its *Correspondence to: Department of Etiology & Carcinogenesis,
sensitivity and specificity are not satisfying [2]. Thus, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,
Beijing 100021, China.
the identification of more effective and reliable **Correspondence to: Department of Abdominal Surgery,
markers for early detection of primary HCC is Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,
extremely important and numerous efforts have Beijing 100021, China
been made during the past decades. Received 1 August 2010; Revised 18 October 2010; Accepted
27 October 2010
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small RNAs that DOI 10.1002/mc.20712
regulate mRNA translation and function as onco- Published online 10 December 2010 in Wiley Online Library
genes or tumor suppressor genes, have attracted (wileyonlinelibrary.com).

2010 WILEY-LISS, INC.


SERUM miRNAs IN LIVER CANCER OR HEPATITIS 137
miR-20, miR-21, miR-221/222, and miR-224 are up- blood samples were taken at the time when the
regulated but miR-122, miR-145, miR-150, miR- disease was active. This study was approved by the
199a, miR-199b, miR-200b, miR-214, and miR-223 Institutional Review Board of the Chinese Academy
are down-regulated [8,9]. Many of these miRNAs are of Medical Sciences Cancer Institute and Hospital.
thought to play important role in hepatocarcino-
genesis and other types of human cancer. Among the RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription
deregulated miRNAs, miR-21 functions as an onco- Blood sample was centrifuged at 3000g for 10 min
gene and its up-regulation promotes malignant cell at 48C to completely remove cellular components,
proliferation, invasion and metastasis [10,11], and the supernatant (serum) was collected. RNA was
whereas miR-223 may function as tumor suppressor then extracted from 100 ml of serum using the
gene and is commonly repressed in HCC [12]. MiR- TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) accord-
122 is a liver-specific miRNA and loss of its expression ing to the protocol provided by the manufacturer.
contributes to the malignant phenotype of HCC cells Briefly, 1.0-ml TRIZOL reagent and 200-ml chloro-
[1315]. form were added to the serum sample and the
MiRNAs in serum or plasma have been considered mixture was vortexed for 15 s and stood at 258C for
as promising novel biomarkers for cancer diagnosis 3 min. After centrifugation at 12 000g for 15 min at
and prognosis [16]. For example, it has been reported 48C, the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube
that 3 miRNAs (miR-21, miR-155, and miR-210) are and 500-ml isopropanol was added. After incubation
elevated in serum of patients with diffuse large B-cell at 208C for 20 min, the mixture was centrifuged at
lymphoma compared with healthy individuals and 12 000g for 10 min at 48C to remove the supernatant
miR-21 elevation is also associated with relapse-free and the RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol.
survival [17]. Recently, more studies have been After removal of ethanol by centrifugation at 7500g
emerging to show that serum miRNAs are potential for 5 min at 48C, RNA was air-dried for 5 min and
diagnostic or prognostic markers for certain types of then dissolved in 30-ml RNase-free water. The purity
cancer including lung [18,19], prostate [20], color- of isolated RNA was determined by OD260/280 using
ectal [21], ovarian [22], and breast [23] cancers. a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Worcester,
However, no study has so far been reported on serum MA), with the value around 2.0 indicating high
miRNAs and HCC. On the basis of these findings, we purity. Each sample of 11.5-ml RNA was polyadeny-
hypothesized that some deregulated miRNAs in HCC lated and reversely transcribed to cDNA in a final
would also present in serum of patients with HCC volume of 30 ml using polyadenylation polymerase
and might serve as diagnostic markers. (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and First-Strand
To examine this hypothesis, we selected three cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) with
commonly deregulated miRNAs in HCC, miR-21, oligo-d(T) primer. The cDNA product was 1:5 diluted
miR-122, and miR-233, for analysis in patients with with water and stored at 808C for analysis.
primary HCC and healthy controls. Because the
expression levels of some miRNAs in liver tissue and/ Validation of Internal Reference for Serum miRNA
or serum are also elevated due to liver injury [2426] Quantification
and it is a common nature that primary HCC is often To detect the interest miRNAs in serum sample
accompanied with chronic hepatitis [27], in this by quantitative real-time PCR, it must have stable
study we also analyzed these three serum miRNAs in internal references. Because there are no universal
patients with chronic type B hepatitis. internal references that have been validated to use, 7
miRNAs that are presented in human serum, RNU48,
MATERIALS AND METHODS RNU6B, let-7a, miR-16, miR-142-3p, miR-181a, and
miR-181c [18,20,28], were empirically chosen for
Study Subjects examination in serum samples from seven healthy
This study consisted of 101 patients with advanced individuals, four patients with HCC, and four
primary HCC, 48 patients with chronic type B patients with chronic type B hepatitis. The stability
hepatitis, and 89 healthy controls. Patients with of these miRNAs was then tested with geNorm
HCC and patients with chronic type B hepatitis were software [29] and the most reliable miRNAs were
recruited at Cancer Hospital and Peking Union chosen as internal references.
Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
(Beijing), respectively. Healthy controls were ran- Quantification of Serum miRNAs
domly selected from a database consisting of 2500 Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) quantification
individuals based on a physical examination. Each of miRNAs was performed with ABI Prism 7900HT
participant donated 5-ml blood sample for serum sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems,
miRNA analysis. For HCC patients, blood samples Foster City, CA) using SYBR Green PCR Master
were taken at the time of initial consultation before Mixture (Takara). The miRNA-specific primers
definitive surgical intervention and/or adjuvant (Supplementary Table I) were designed on the basis
therapy. For patients with chronic type B hepatitis, of the miRNA sequences obtained from the miRBase

Molecular Carcinogenesis
138 XU ET AL.

database (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk/). Melting Validation of miR-181a and miR-181c as Internal


curve analysis was performed at the end of PCR References for Quantification
cycles in order to validate the specificity of the In order to select internal references for quantifi-
expected PCR product. All samples were run in cation of serum miRNAs, we examined the levels of
duplicate, including blank controls without cDNA. RNU6B, RNU48, let-7a, miR-16, miR-142-3p, miR-
The cycle threshold (Ct) is defined as the number of 181a, and miR-181c by using quantitative RT-PCR in
cycles required for the fluorescent signal to cross the 15 serum samples (seven healthy individuals, four
threshold in qPCR. The formula 2DCt was used to HCC patients, and four chronic type B hepatitis
calculate the levels of miRNAs in serum, where patients). Data analysis with geNorm showed that
DCt mean (Ct of internal references)Ct of target combined use of both miR-181a and miR-181c as
miRNA. internal references had an M value of 0.154, indicat-
ing that these two miRNAs are stably expressed in
Statistical Analysis
serum and are optimal references for the PCR
MannWhitney test was performed to compare quantification of other serum miRNAs [29].
the differences in serum miRNA levels between
patients and healthy controls. All tests were two-
sided test and P < 0.05 was considered statistically Increased Levels of Serum miRNAs in Patients With HCC
significant. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) We first analyzed the profiles of serum miR-21,
curves were established to evaluate the value of miR-122, and miR-223 in a training set consisting of
serum miRNA levels for discriminating patients with 10 healthy controls and 10 HCC patients. The
HCC or chronic hepatitis from healthy controls, and median levels of these serum miRNAs were signifi-
patients with HCC from patients with chronic cantly higher in patients with HCC than in healthy
hepatitis. Statistical analyses were performed with controls (0.68 vs. 0.12, P 0.028; 0.67 vs. 0.22,
SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). P 0.007; and 3.13 vs. 0.24, P 0.005; respectively).
Similar trend of the results were obtained in the
RESULTS validation set of 79 healthy controls and 91 HCC
patients, with the levels of serum miR-21, miR-122,
Characteristics of Study Subjects and miR-223 being significantly elevated in patients
Select characteristics of study subjects are sum- than in controls (3.85 vs. 0.14, P 6.90  1012; 1.40
marized in Table I. There were no significant differ- vs. 0.40, P 9.19  108; and 27.81 vs. 0.46,
ences in sex distribution among the three groups of P 1.01  1010; respectively). Pooled analysis of
study subjects. However, although there was no the training and validation sets showed that differ-
significant difference between patients with HCC ences in the levels of these serum miRNAs between
and healthy controls in terms of age distribution, HCC patients and healthy controls were more
patients with chronic hepatitis were younger than significant (3.36 vs. 0.14, P 7.48  1013; 1.19 vs.
healthy controls and patients with HCC (both 0.34, P 6.93  109; and 17.20 vs. 0.35,
P < 0.001). Seventy-six patients (75.2%) with HCC P 3.90  1012; respectively; Figure 1). However,
were HBsAg positive, whereas none of healthy we noted that although HCC patients had signifi-
controls carried HBV. cantly higher levels of these three serum miRNAs

Table I. Distribution of Select Characteristics of Healthy Controls, Patients With Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and
Patients With Chronic Type B Hepatitis

Healthy controls (n 89) Patients with HCC (n 101) Patients with chronic hepatitisa (n 48)

No. % No. % No. %

Sex
Male 68 76.4 78 77.2 31 64.6
Female 21 23.6 23 22.8 17 35.4
Age (yr)
50 36 40.5 39 38.6 38 79.2
5160 26 29.2 30 29.7 7 14.6
6170 18 20.2 21 20.8 2 4.1
>70 9 10.1 11 10.9 1 2.1
HBV status
HBsAg 0 0.0 76 75.2 48 100.0
HBsAg 100 100.0 25 24.8 0 0.0
a
P < 0.001, compared with healthy controls or patients with HCC in terms of age.

Molecular Carcinogenesis
SERUM miRNAs IN LIVER CANCER OR HEPATITIS 139
levels of miR-21 (22.86 vs. 0.14, P 2.05  1012),
miR-122 (11.02 vs. 0.34, P 4.52  1016), and miR-
223 (11.44 vs. 0.35, P 1.65  1011) were also
elevated in these patients than in healthy controls
(Figure 1). Interestingly, the levels of miR-21 and
miR-122 in serum of patients with chronic hepatitis
were significantly higher than those in patients with
HCC (22.86 vs. 3.36, P 3.99  104 and 11.02 vs.
1.19, P 4.97  108; Figure 1a and b), whereas no
significant difference was observed for miR-223
between the two groups of study subjects (11.44 vs.
17.20, P 0.955; Figure 1c).

Evaluation of miRNAs as Potential Diagnostic Markers


To evaluate whether these serum miRNAs can be
used as potential diagnostic markers for HCC or
hepatitis, ROC curve analyses were performed. It was
revealed that the levels of serum miR-21, miR-122,
and miR-223 were potential markers for discriminat-
ing HCC patients from healthy controls, with ROC
curve areas of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.810.93), 0.79 (95%
CI: 0.710.86), and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.800.92),
respectively (Figure 2a). At the cut-off values of 0.46
(for miR-21), 0.70 (for miR-122), and 1.91 (for miR-
223), the sensitivity and specificity for these markers
were 84% and 73.5%, 70.7% and 69.1%, and 80.0%
and 76.5%, respectively. Similarly, ROC curve anal-
yses revealed that these three miRNAs were useful
markers for discriminating patients with chronic
hepatitis from healthy controls. ROC curve areas for
miR-21, miR-122, and miR-223 were 0.91 (95% CI:
0.840.97), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.880.98), and 0.88 (95%
CI: 0.810.942), respectively (Figure 2b). At the cut-
off values of 3.48 for miR-21, 1.50 for miR-122, and
1.73 for miR-223, sensitivity and specificity were
80.0% and 95.6%, 80.0% and 91.2%, and 80.0% and
75.0%, respectively. However, ROC curve analyses
revealed that these three miRNAs were unable to
differentiate patients with HCC from patients with
chronic hepatitis (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
Figure 1. Serum levels of miR-21 (a), miR-122 (b), and miR-233 (c) In this study, we found that serum miR-21, miR-
in healthy controls (n 89), patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC, n 101), and patients with chronic type B hepatitis (n 48). 122, and miR-223 were significantly elevated in
Values shown (log10 scale at Y-axis) are normalized to miR-181a and patients with HCC or patients with chronic type B
miR-181c. The median levels of the three serum miRNAs in patients hepatitis compared with healthy controls. In addi-
with HCC or chronic hepatitis are significantly higher than that in
healthy controls (all P < 0.0001). The median levels of serum miR-21 tion, the levels of serum miR-21 and miR-122 were
and miR-122 in patients with chronic hepatitis are significantly higher significantly higher in patients with chronic type B
than that in patients with HCC (both P < 0.0001), whereas the
median levels of serum miR-223 are not significantly different
hepatitis than in patients with HCC. All these three
between these two groups of subjects (P 0.957). miRNAs showed potential diagnostic values for HCC
or chronic hepatitis. However, since the significantly
higher levels of serum miR-21 and miR-223 have
than healthy controls, overlap to a certain extent been reported in patients with other types of human
occurred between these two groups of study subjects. cancer compared with healthy controls [17,22], they
may not be specific markers for HCC or chronic
Increased Levels of Serum miRNAs in Patients With hepatitis. Nevertheless, because miR-122 has been
Type B Hepatitis shown to be liver-specific [30] and our ROC analyses
We examined 48 serum samples of patients with yielded a curve area of 0.93 for chronic hepatitis and
chronic type B hepatitis and found that the median 0.79 for HCC, this miRNA could serve as a potential

Molecular Carcinogenesis
140 XU ET AL.

Figure 2. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves of the miR-21, miR-122, and miR-233 for discriminating
hepatocellular carcinoma (a) or chronic type B hepatitis (b).

marker for chronic hepatitis and perhaps HCC if liver patients with HCC than in healthy controls, which is
injury caused by other factors can be excluded. consistent with the previous studies and suggests
It has been shown that miR-122 and miR-223 are that miR-21 may be a universal serum marker for
frequently down-regulated in HCC compared with several cancers. However, we also detected a signifi-
adjacent benign liver [12,14,15,3133]. Thus, it cantly higher miR-21 levels in serum of patients with
appears contrary and unexpected that the levels of chronic type B hepatitis; furthermore, the median
miR-122 and miR-223 are elevated in serum of HCC level of serum miR-21 in patients with chronic
patients. Our results showed that the elevated serum hepatitis was much higher than that in patients with
miR-122 and miR-223 are presented not only in HCC (22.86 vs. 3.36, P < 0.001). This finding points
patients with HCC but also in patients with chronic out that elevated serum miR-21 could also come
hepatitis, suggesting that the elevated miR-122 and from tissue injury such as hepatitis. Since patients
miR-223 in the serum of patients may reflect liver with chronic hepatitis may have more serious
injury but not tumor itself. Hepatocytes contain damage of hepatocytes than patients with HCC, it
abundant miR-122 and miR-223 and damage of is reasonable to see much higher level of serum miR-
hepatocytes caused by inflammation due to virus 21 and miR-122 in patients with chronic hepatitis
infection or cancer would be expected to release than in patients with HCC. Elevation of certain
significant amount of these miRNAs into the circu- miRNAs in serum or plasma has been proven to come
lation. Because serum miRNAs have been shown to from corresponding tissue damage. For example,
be very stable [30], miRNAs leaked from damaged elevated plasma miR-208 and miR-1 have been
hepatocytes would accumulate in blood to a high shown to come from damaged cells due to myocar-
level. This might explain why miR-122 and miR-223 dial injury [39] and acute myocardial infarction [40].
are down-regulated in HCC tissues but elevated in An important issue in detection of serum miRNAs
serum of HCC patients. These findings suggest that is that there are no widely accepted universal internal
the two miRNAs might be markers of liver damage references for quantification. RNU6B, RNU48, let-7a,
rather than HCC. Similar results have been obtained miR-16, miR-142-3p, miR-181a, and miR-181c have
in the previous studies using animal model, showing been used as internal references in tissue samples but
that drug-induced liver injury elevated plasma miR- not all in serum samples [18,20,28]. In the present
122 levels [24,26]. study, these candidate miRNAs were therefore
MiR-21 is expressed in various human tissues initially tested as internal references in a set of serum
including the liver and over-expression of this samples. Analysis of the resultant Ct values with
miRNA has been observed in many types of cancer geNorm software usually used for selection of most
such as breast cancer [34], lung cancer [35], colon reliable reference genes [29] showed that miR-181a
cancer [36], and HCC [10,11,37,38]. Recent studies and miR-181c are the most stable and optimal as
have shown that serum miR-21 levels are signifi- internal references under our experimental condi-
cantly increased in patients with defused large B-cell tions. With this couple of serum miRNAs as internal
lymphoma or ovarian cancer [17,22]. In the present references for quantification, our results in the
study, we found higher levels of serum miR-21 in present study should be reliable. However, to

Molecular Carcinogenesis
SERUM miRNAs IN LIVER CANCER OR HEPATITIS 141
validate whether these elevated serum miRNAs can potentiates expression of Stathmin1. Gastroenterology
serve as biomarkers for hepatitis or HCC, further 2008;135:257269.
13. Bai S, Nasser MW, Wang B, et al. MicroRNA-122 inhibits
studies with larger sample size are needed. In
tumorigenic properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and
addition, further studies should also include patients sensitizes these cells to sorafenib. J Biol Chem 2009;284:
with type C hepatitis and patients with liver injury 3201532027.
induced by other factors such as chemicals and drugs 14. Tsai WC, Hsu PW, Lai TC, et al. MicroRNA-122, a tumor
for comparison. suppressor microRNA that regulates intrahepatic metastasis
of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2009;49:1571
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that three 1582.
miRNAs commonly deregulated in primary HCC, 15. Coulouarn C, Factor VM, Andersen JB, Durkin ME, Thor-
miR-21, miR-122, and miR-223, are presented at geirsson SS. Loss of miR-122 expression in liver cancer
higher levels in serum of patients with HCC correlates with suppression of the hepatic phenotype and
compared with healthy individuals, suggesting that gain of metastatic properties. Oncogene 2009;28:35263536.
16. Cortez MA, Calin GA. MicroRNA identification in plasma and
these serum miRNAs, especially miR-122 known to serum: A new tool to diagnose and monitor diseases. Expert
be liver specific, might serve as potential markers of Opin Biol Ther 2009;9:703711.
the cancer. However, because these miRNAs are also 17. Lawrie CH, Gal S, Dunlop HM, et al. Detection of elevated
presented at significantly higher levels in serum of levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum of patients
with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2008;
patients with chronic hepatitis, they are more likely 141:672675.
to reflect liver injury caused by inflammation. 18. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in
Therefore, caution should be taken when one serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer
intends to use these miRNAs as markers of HCC or and other diseases. Cell Res 2008;18:9971006.
other types of human cancer. 19. Hu Z, Chen X, Zhao Y, et al. Serum microRNA signatures
identified in a genome-wide serum microRNA expression
profiling predict survival of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Oncol 2010;28:17211726.
This study was supported by the State Key Basic 20. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, et al. Circulating microRNAs
Research Program (2004CB518701). as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 2008;105:1051310518.
21. Huang Z, Huang D, Ni S, Peng Z, Sheng W, Du X. Plasma
REFERENCES microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for early
1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2010;127:118
2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74108. 126.
2. Zinkin NT, Grall F, Bhaskar K, et al. Serum proteomics and 22. Resnick KE, Alder H, Hagan JP, Richardson DL, Croce CM,
biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver Cohn DE. The detection of differentially expressed micro-
disease. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:470477. RNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel
3. Zhang HH, Wang XJ, Li GX, Yang E, Yang NM. Detection of real-time PCR platform. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:5559.
let-7a microRNA by real-time PCR in gastric carcinoma. 23. Heneghan HM, Miller N, Lowery AJ, Sweeney KJ, Newell J,
World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:28832888. Kerin MJ. Circulating microRNAs as novel minimally invasive
4. Wu W, Sun M, Zou GM, Chen J. MicroRNA and cancer: biomarkers for breast cancer. Ann Surg 2010;251:499505.
Current status and prospective. Int J Cancer 2007;120:953 24. Wang K, Zhang S, Marzolf B, et al. Circulating microRNAs,
960. potential biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury. Proc Natl
5. Visone R, Petrocca F, Croce CM. Micro-RNAs in gastro- Acad Sci USA 2009;106:44024407.
intestinal and liver disease. Gastroenterology 2008;135: 25. Yu CH, Xu CF, Li YM. Association of MicroRNA-223
18661869. expression with hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice.
6. Iorio MV, Casalini P, Piovan C, et al. MicroRNA-205 regulates Dig Dis Sci 2009;54:23622366.
HER3 in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2009;69:2195 26. Laterza OF, Lim L, Garrett-Engele PW, et al. Plasma micro-
2200. RNA as sensitive and specific biomarkers of tissue injury. Clin
7. Garzon R, Heaphy CE, Havelange V, et al. MicroRNA 29b Chem 2009;55:19771983.
functions in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2009;114: 27. Nguyen VT, Law MG, Dore GJ. Hepatitis B-related hepato-
53315341. cellular carcinoma: Epidemiological characteristics and dis-
8. Varnholt H, Drebber U, Schulze F, et al. MicroRNA gene ease burden. J Viral Hepat 2009;16:453463.
expression profile of hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocel- 28. Ng EK, Chong WW, Jin H, et al. Differential expression of
lular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008;47:12231232. microRNAs in plasma of patients with colorectal cancer:
9. Ladeiro Y, Couchy G, Balabaud C, et al. MicroRNA profiling in A potential marker for colorectal cancer screening. Gut
hepatocellular tumors is associated with clinical features and 2009;58:13751381.
oncogene/tumor suppressor gene mutations. Hepatology 29. Ahn K, Huh JW, Park SJ, et al. Selection of internal reference
2008;47:19551963. genes for SYBR green qRT-PCR studies of rhesus monkey
10. Connolly E, Melegari M, Landgraf P, et al. Elevated (Macaca mulatta) tissues. BMC Mol Biol 2008;9:78.
expression of the miR-17-92 polycistron and miR-21 in 30. Chang J, Nicolas E, Marks D, et al. MiR-122, a mammalian
hepadnavirus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma contrib- liver-specific microRNA, is processed from hcr mRNA and
utes to the malignant phenotype. Am J Pathol 2008;173: may downregulate the high affinity cationic amino acid
856864. transporter CAT-1. RNA Biol 2004;1:106113.
11. Meng F, Henson R, Wehbe-Janek H, Ghoshal K, Jacob ST, 31. Kutay H, Bai S, Datta J, et al. Downregulation of miR-122 in
Patel T. MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN the rodent and human hepatocellular carcinomas. J Cell
tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Biochem 2006;99:671678.
Gastroenterology 2007;133:647658. 32. Girard M, Jacquemin E, Munnich A, Lyonnet S, Henrion-
12. Wong QW, Lung RW, Law PT, et al. MicroRNA-223 Caude A. MiR-122, a paradigm for the role of microRNAs in
is commonly repressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and the liver. J Hepatol 2008;48:648656.

Molecular Carcinogenesis
142 XU ET AL.

33. Murakami Y, Yasuda T, Saigo K, et al. Comprehensive peutic outcome in colon adenocarcinoma. JAMA 2008;
analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular 299:425436.
carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues. Oncogene 2006;25: 37. Jiang J, Gusev Y, Aderca I, et al. Association of MicroRNA
25372545. expression in hepatocellular carcinomas with hepatitis infection,
34. Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu CG, et al. MicroRNA gene cirrhosis, and patient survival. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:419427.
expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer 38. Pineau P, Volinia S, McJunkin K, et al. miR-221 over-
Res 2005;65:70657070. expression contributes to liver tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad
35. Markou A, Tsaroucha EG, Kaklamanis L, Fotinou M, Sci USA 2010;107:264269.
Georgoulias V, Lianidou ES. Prognostic value of mature 39. Ji X, Takahashi R, Hiura Y, Hirokawa G, Fukushima Y, Iwai N.
microRNA-21 and microRNA-205 overexpression in non- Plasma miR-208 as a biomarker of myocardial injury. Clin
small cell lung cancer by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Clin Chem 2009;55:19441949.
Chem 2008;54:16961704. 40. Ai J, Zhang R, Li Y, et al. Circulating microRNA-1 as a
36. Schetter AJ, Leung SY, Sohn JJ, et al. MicroRNA potential novel biomarker for acute myocardial infarction.
expression profiles associated with prognosis and thera- Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010;391:7377.

Molecular Carcinogenesis

You might also like