VLF EM-16 Survey / Interpretation Report

Over the
Middle-Wolf-Fisher Zones
White River, Ontario

Prepared For

Harte Gold Corporation

By

Shaun Parent

Superior Exploration, Adventure & Climbing Co. Ltd.

July 12, 2017

Table Of Contents

List of Tables, Maps & Appendix ............................................................................ 2

Table List............................................................................................................. 2
Map List .............................................................................................................. 2
Appendix List ...................................................................................................... 2
Preamble ............................................................................................................... 4
Executive Summary: .............................................................................................. 4
Property Access ..................................................................................................... 5
Deposit Types ........................................................................................................ 5
Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5
Personnel ............................................................................................................... 5
Work Performed................................................................................................... 8
Fieldwork .......................................................................................................... 8
VLF Data Collection Process .......................................................................... 8
Interpretation & Modelling ................................................................................. 9
VLF2DMF Data Processing ............................................................................... 9
Discussion of Results ............................................................................................ 10
VLF Anomalies................................................................................................. 12
TX NAA........................................................................................................... 12
TX NML .......................................................................................................... 16
Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 21
Recommendations ............................................................................................... 21
List of References................................................................................................. 23
Certificate of Qualifications ................................................................................. 24

1
List of Tables, Maps & Appendix

Table List
Table 1 Example of VLF Data Collection........................................................................................................ 8

Map List
Map 1 General Location Map .......................................................................................................... 6
Map 2 Location Map of VLF Grid ..................................................................................................... 7
Map 3 VLF Grid Elevation Map ...................................................................................................... 11
Map 4 TX NAA In-Phase Fraser Contours....................................................................................... 13
Map 5 TX NAA Quadrature Fraser Contours.................................................................................. 14
Map 6 TX NAA Resistivity Contours ............................................................................................... 15
Map 7 TX NML In-Phase Fraser Contours ...................................................................................... 16
Map 8 TX NML Quadrature Fraser Contours ................................................................................. 19
Map 9 TX NML Resistivity Contours ............................................................................................... 20

Appendix List
APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................................... 25
NAA Figure 1 Line 135N Raw Data Profile .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 2 Line 135N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 3 Line 137N Raw Data Profile .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 4 Line 137N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 5 Line 139N Raw Data Profile .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 6 Line 139N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 7 Line 141N Raw Data Profile .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 8 Line 141N Model 2000 with Fraser Picks ..................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 9 Line 143N Raw Data Profile .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 10 Line 143N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 11 Line 144N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 12 Line 144N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 13 Line 145N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 14 Line 145N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 15 Line 146N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 16 Line 146N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 17 Line 147N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 18 Line 147N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 19 Line 148N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 20 Line 148N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 21 Line 149N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 22 Line 149N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 23 Line 150N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 24 Line 150N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 25 Line 151N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 26 Line 151N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 27 Line 152N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 28 Line 152N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 29 Line 153N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 30 Line 153N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 31 Line 154N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 32 Line 154N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2
 NAA Figure 33 Line 155N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 34 Line 155N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 35 Line 157N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 36 Line 157N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 37 Line 159N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 38 Line 159N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 39 Line 161N Raw Data Profile ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NAA Figure 40 Line 161N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

APPENDIX B ...................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

NML Figure 1 Line 135N Raw Data Profile ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 2 Line 135N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 3 Line 137N Raw Data Profile ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 4 Line 137N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 5 Line 139N Raw Data Profile ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 6 Line 139N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 7 Line 141N Raw Data Profile ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 8 Line 141N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 9 Line 143N Raw Data Profile ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 10 Line 143N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 11 Line 144N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 12 Line 144N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 13 Line 145N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 14 Line 145N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 15 Line 146N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 16 Line 146N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 17 Line 147N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 18 Line 147N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 19 Line 148N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 20 Line 148N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 21 Line 149N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 22 Line 149N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 23 Line 150N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 24 Line 150N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 25 Line 151N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 26 Line 151N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 27 Line 152N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 28 Line 152N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 29 Line 153N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 30 Line 153N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 31 Line 154N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 32 Line 154N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 33 Line 155N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 34 Line 155N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 35 Line 157N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 36 Line 157N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 37 Line 159N Raw Data Profie ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 38 Line 159N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 39 Line 161N Raw Data Profile ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
NML Figure 40 Line 161N Model 2000 Ohm with Fraser Picks .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3
Preamble
Superior Exploration, Adventure & Climbing Co. Ltd. is an Incorporated Company specializing in
Mining Exploration and Geophysics as well as Professional climbing.

Our ground VLF surveys (YVLF) have proven themselves as a very effective way to complete
geophysics on the ground in a non-invasive way. No cut lines are needed and a permit is not
required.

We have worked in many countries and have experience working in a wide variety of
environments such as VMS, Breccia Pipes, Epithermal Veins and Shear Hosted Gold Deposits.

Shaun Parent, BSc. P. Geo is a member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of

Ontario as well as the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada. He has over 30 years
experience working in the Geological and Geophysical Field, specializing in VLF, however, has
also worked with I.P., Max Min , Surface & Borehole Pulse EM, Airborne Magnetics and
Magnetometer.

Sandra Slater is a member of the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada. She has
been working in the Geological/Geophysical field for over 8 years, specializing in data analysis
and VLF2DMF software.

Shaun began working with the developer of the VLF2DMF software since its inception in 2008
and he and Sandra continue to do so. Throughout the process, many test surveys have been
completed with proven, successful results.

Executive Summary:
This Ground VLF test survey was completed in the area known as the Middle-Wolf-Fisher Zones.
The property is located approximately 28 kilometers Northeast of White River, Ontario. (Map 1)

The survey was carried out in May & June 2017, using a VLF EM-16 unit and a handheld Garmin
GPS-60CSX. Two transmitters were read at each station: NAA 24.0 KHz Cutler, Maine and
NML 25.2 KHz- La Moure, North Dakota. A total of 33.84 Km of VLF was carried out on 20
previously cut grid lines. (Map 2)

The main objective of the survey was to determine if the VLF Survey could delineate zones
carrying mineralization and or structures in the area of the Middle-Wolf and Fisher Zones. No
geological information was known prior to the completion of the VLF survey. The location of
the Wolf zone and the approximate location of the Middle zone were known prior to the
survey. No location was known for the Fisher zone.

4
Property Access
Access is by the following:
- Cutting Road 100 from highway 17 for 24 kilometers to the junction of road 300
- Road 300 to the east until kilometer 4 at junction of road 305
- Road 305 east and then south for 11.3 kilometers to junction of road 306
- Follow road 306 for 7 kilometers to a large open trench with outcrop where there is
a parking area. This is approximately at Line 145N, Station 12+60E

Deposit Types
The Sugar Zone is an epithermal deposit located in the Sugar Deformation Zone, or SDZ, which
is an area of high strain. The Sugar Zone, along with the Wolf Zone, make up the only two
known gold deposits within the relatively small SDZ, and the only two currently known gold
deposits within the Dayohessarah Greenstone Belt. (Kociumbas,M.W; Fardy,D.P 2012)

Introduction
A VLF-EM16 survey is a relatively simple and economic geophysical survey that is used to better
understand shallow, vertical and sub vertical bedrock conductors.

This report describes the findings and results of the VLF EM-16 survey utilizing the VLF2DMF
processing software of which the author of this report has assisted in its development since
2007. It enables the processing and inversion of electromagnetic (EM) induction data acquired
along a survey area using a Very Low Frequency (VLF) (Santos 2013)

The software generates profiles of Raw Data, Fraser Filtered Data, KH, Resistivity and (2-D)
Modelled Inversions.

VLF data collected in the surveyed area was also compiled onto plan maps of contoured Fraser
Filter data and contours of Resistivity data.

Personnel
The VLF EM-16 operator and GPS field navigator responsible for the collection of all raw data
was Shaun Parent assisted by Sandra Slater.
Processing and Interpretation of the VLF data using the VLF2DMF Software was completed by
Sandra Slater and Shaun Parent.

5
Map 1 General Location Map

6
Map 2 Location Map of VLF Grid

7
Work Performed
Fieldwork
The VLF EM-16 survey consisted of running the survey along 20 previously cut lines. Some lines
were 200 meters apart and others were 100 meters apart. Basic prospecting was completed
during the survey, mapping pertinent findings such as outcrops and historical sample sites and
drill holes.

The following parameters were used throughout the survey

Equipment Used: VLF EM-16 unit and a handheld Garmin 60-CSX PS

VLF Transmitters Used: NAA - 24.0 KHz. Cutler, Maine (East)

NML - 25.2 KHz. La Moure, North Dakota (West)

VLF survey direction: The VLF Em-16 receiver faced a direction of 47 degrees true azimuth for
each reading taken. Lines began with station 0+00 located at the west end of each line.
Previously cut grid line numbers were used.

VLF survey stations: All VLF readings were taken at approximately 20 meter stations along the
survey line.

Parameters of Measurement: In-phase and Quad-phase components of a vertical magnetic

field is measured as a percentage of horizontal primary fields. (Tangent of tilt angle and
ellipticity). VLF transmitter NAA was to the east while transmitter NML was to the west. The
transmitters are chosen so that the direction to the transmitting station is as close to the
orientation of the bedrock strike.
VLF Data Collection Process
Field data was collected as follows on each surveyed line.

Each station was saved onto the Handheld Garmin 60CSX GPS Unit (including local
features such as power lines, fences and geological structures)
VLF readings for each station were recorded in a notebook as In-Phase and Quadrature
corresponding to the line number and station number. (See example in Table 1)
Field information was transferred to a Garmin map source program where line and
station information could be viewed.
Garmin and VLF data were compiled onto an excel spreadsheet and then inputted into
the VLF2DMF processing software. For this test survey all UTM Values are NAD 83.
Table 1 Example of VLF Data Collection

NAA NAA NML NML

Notes
Line 137N In phase Quadrature In phase Quadrature
0+00 10 6 4 5 swamp

8
Interpretation & Modelling
VLF2DMF Data Processing
All VLF data collected was processed and interpreted separately for TX NAA and TX NML.
Although all profiles/filters were used in the interpretation process, Raw Data and 2D Modelled
Inversion are included in the appendix at the end of this report.

Raw and Filtered Data Profiles

The raw data for each frequency was plotted for each line surveyed. No filtering
or smoothing of the raw data was done. (Appendix A & B)

Fraser Filter Profile with Fraser Peaks

Raw data was run through the Fraser filter. This filter transforms In-Phase cross
overs and inflections into positive peak anomalies. (Fraser 1969) In-Phase
inflections and cross overs are usually plus to minus, while Quadrature responses
are negative to positive giving a negative peak anomaly when the Fraser Filter is
applied. Fraser filter data from the 20 lines was compiled to produce plan maps
of Contoured Fraser Filter (In-phase and Quadrature) values. (TX NAA Maps 4 &
5) & (TX NML Maps 7 & 8)

K-H Profiles
Raw Data was run through the Karous-Hjelt (K-H) filter. The filter is applied to
obtain a section of current density. The higher values are generally associated
with conductive structures. (Karous, Hjelt 1983) If there is depth extent, this is
shown on the In-phase profile as dark blue.

Resistivity Profiles: 2000 Ohms

The apparent resistivity was calculated. The resistivity can be calculated if the
mean environmental resistivity is known at the beginning of the VLF profile. A
mean resistivity of 2000 ohms was used for all lines. Resistivity data from each
profile was combined to produce plans maps. (TX NAA Map 6) (TX NML Map 9)

Model 2000 Ohms

A resistivity of 2000 Ohms was used to build an initial model used in the
inversion to obtain a realistic cross section of the line surveyed. Conductive
zones are red/yellow while resistive zones are blue. A depth scale is found on
the left side of model profiles. Surface conductive zones show little depth
extent, have a horizontal display and are limited in depth.
The maximum depth slice with a bedrock resistivity of 2000 Ohms is 144.0
meters for transmitter NAA (24.0 KHz.) and 139.0 meters for TX NML (25.2 KhZ).
All Inversion models have the same color scaling using a minimum resistivity of
10 and a maximum of 10000. The vertical exaggeration of all models is 1.0.
Fraser Filter anomaly picks are found across the top of the profile. (TX NAA -
Appendix A) & (TX NML - Appendix B)
9
Discussion of Results
Lines: 135N, 137N, 139N, 141N, 143N, 44N, 145N, 46N, 147N, 148N, 149N, 150N, 151N, 152N,
153N, 54N, 155N, 157N, 159N, 161N

Map 3 Shows the layout of the VLF lines on an elevation contour map.

The stronger anomalies were interpreted into main trends, however, there are more, weaker
ones that could not be followed due to the 200 meter spacing between lines as well as a lack of
knowledge of the geological strike prior to interpretation. A more accurate result could be
achieved with additional fill in lines being completed in order to verify responses.

During the VLF survey, VLF conductors were found in outcrop. The UTM location of the Middle
Zone was given. The UTM of the Fisher zone was unknown at the time of this survey.??? IS THIS
NECESSARY? If so, explain the relevance???. Take all of this out

Many rusty outcrops were found during the VLF Field survey and can be viewed on the models
included in Appendix A & B at the end of this report.

The following are recommended for ground follow-up:

1. 137N 8+00E Middle Zone

2. 139N 3+60E rust
5+40E rust
3. 146N 6+40E rust
7+60E rust
4. 147N 5+20E rust
9+80E Wolf Zone
5. 148N 5+00E rust
6. 151N 9+60E rust
12+60E rusty boulder
7. 152N 11+80E rust
14+50E rust
8. 153N 4+90N rust
9. 154N 0+20E rust
10. 155N 1+20E rust
9+40E rusty boulder
11+60E rust

10
Map 3 VLF Grid Elevation Map

11
VLF Anomalies
VLF Trends were identified from the Fraser Filter Picks for TX NAA and TX NML
TX NAA
Maps 4 & 5 Fraser Filters Contours
Map-6 Resistivity Contours
Several of the NAA trends follow along the edge of a resistivity high
Several of the NAA trends follow the resistivity low in the middle of
the grid

The Middle-Wolf-Fisher Zone VLF Grid has 25 anomalous TX NAA trends. Are these trends
recommended for ground follow-up?- No

1. 151A-152A-153A
2. 152B-153C
3. 151E-152D-153E-154A-155A-157A-159A-161A
4. 152G-153H-154E-155D-157D-159E-161D
5. 135E-137C-139G-141B-143A-144A-145A-146B-147B-148C
6. 146B-147B-148C
7. 135H-137G-139J-141E-143D-144F-145D-146C-147C-148D-149D-150C-151H-153I-154F-
155E
8. 135H-137G-139K-141G-143E-144F-145E-146E-147E-148F-149E-150E-151J-152I-153J-
154G-155F-157F-159G-157G-159H-161F
9. 147F-148G-149F-150G-151K-152J-153H-154I-155H-157H-159J-161H
10. 144G-145H-146H-147H-148I-149H-150J-151N-152L-153L-154K-155J
11. 135L-137M-139M-141I-143G-144H
12. 139N-141J-143H-144I
13. 145K-146J-147J-148J-149J-150L-1510
14. 151P-152M-153M-154M-155K-157J-159L-161I
15. 150M-151Q
16. 147J-148K-1500-151R-1520-1530-155M-157K-159M-161J
17. 1520-153P-1540-155N
18. 150R-151T-152Q
19. 150S-151U-152R-154R
20. 146N-147M-148M-150P-151R
21. 144K HOW CAN YOU HAVE A TREND WITH ONLY ONE ANOMALY? You can
22. 141M-143J-144M-145M
23. 144N-145N-146P-147N-1480-149N-150Q-151S-152P-143Q-154P-1550-157M-1590-
161M
24. 139T-1410
25. 135I-137H
12
Map 4 TX NAA In-Phase Fraser Contours

13
Map 5 TX NAA Quadrature Fraser Contours

14
Map 6 TX NAA Resistivity Contours

15
TX NML
Maps 7 & 8 Fraser Filters Contours
Map 9 Resistivity contours
Several VLF tends follow the edge of a resistivity high on west edge of
grid
Several VLF trends follow the resistivity low in middle of grid
There is a strong resistivity low in the area of the following VLF Picks
between lines 150N and 151N to 155N
150-M 150-N 150-0 150-P 150-Q
151-Q 151-R 151-S 151-T
152-O 152-Q 152-R
153-0 153-P 153-Q 153-R
154154-P 154-Q
155-0

The Middle-Wolf-Fisher Zone VLF Grid has 26 anomalous TX NML trends. Are these
recommended for follow-up? NO

1. 151B-152A-153A
2. 151C-152D-153D-154A-157A-159A-161A
3. 153E-154C
4. 137A-139F
5. 135D-137B-139G-141B-143A-144A-145A-146A-147A-148A-149A-150A
6. 149B-150B-151I-152F-153H-154E-155D-157F-159E-161D
7. 146B-147C
8. 146C-147D-148D-149C-150C-151J-152G
9. 135H-137F-139K-141E-143E-144D-145D
10. 135J-137H
11. 135I-137G-139L-141G-143F-144E-145E-146E-147F-148F-149E-150E-151K-152H-
153H-154G-155F-157G-159G-161E
12. 157H-159H-161G
13. 144F-145F-146F-147G-148G-149G-150F-151L-152J-153J-154I-155H
14. 150G-151M-152J
15. 150G-151M-152J
16. 148I-149I-150H
17. 143I-144G-145H-146H-147I
18. 135L-137J-139N-141I-143J-144H-145I
19. 146I-147K-148J-149J-150J
20. 135M-137K-1390-141J-143L-144I-146J-147L-148K-149K-150L-151P-152O-153O
21. 153P-154P-155N-157M-159M-161L
22. 150N-151R-152P-153Q-154Q-1550-1570-1590-161N

16
23. 139T-141N-143M
24. 141N-143N-144K-145K-146K-147N-149M-1500-151S-152Q-153R
25. 147Q-148Q-150P-151T-152R-153S-154S
26. 148R-150Q-151U-152S

17
Map 7 TX NML In-Phase Fraser Contours

18
Map 8 TX NML Quadrature Fraser Contours

19
Map 9 TX NML Resistivity Contours

20
Conclusions
This TEST Ground VLF EM-16 survey over the Middle-Wolf-Fisher Zones was successful in:
Defining Several VLF bedrock conductors including a trend over the Wolf Zone and the
Middle Zone.
Several VLF trends from the Wolf Zone were identified heading north from line 147N.
Since the UTM location of the Fisher zone was not disclosed at the time of the VLF
survey, the VLF Picks and trends covering this zone could not be identified by the
author.
Discovery of new rusty outcrops during the course of the survey identified by VLF
anomalies.
Using a bedrock background resistivity of 2000 ohms gave us modelled sections to 144.0
meters in depth and outlined several highly resistive and minimally resistive rock units.
Without geological information or geological strike information, it was difficult to match
the many VLF picks between the 200 meter lines and in some cases the 100 meter lines.

Recommendations
Run additional 100 meter fill in lines between 156N, 158N, 160N in order to obtain
additional VLF Picks and trends northward from line 154N. This information will allow an
easier interpretation and outline trends across the survey area.
View the Reconnaissance VLF lines on Google Earth images in order to identify linear
structures.
Ground follow up of the VLF Picks and Trends outlined in this report. These include
areas where historical sampling was taken and where rusty outcrops were found during
the course of the VLF survey.
Ground follow-up of VLF Picks and Trends north of the Middle Zone. There were plenty
of outcrops north of line 143N and the small lake. Prospecting along these trends might
uncover outcropping of the Middle Zone trend.
Compare the VLF Survey trends with known geological mapping, as it appears that many
of the weaker VLF picks and trends represent geological contacts.
Produce plan maps of modelled data at various depths of -25, -50 & -100 in an attempt
to delineate the trends of the best conductive zones.
Produce plan maps of 3D Fraser filtered data to better follow weaker trends across the
grid.
Produce plan maps of KH filter data in order to delineate the best conductive zones
across the grid.
Overlay known drilling onto the VLF section models in order to better understand the
VLF responses.
Use a portable VLF transmitter in order to better energize the conductive horizons
between the Wolf Zone and the strong VLF Conductors from Lines 147N to 161N. This
will energize the conductive zones due to better coupling of energy. The Transmitter
21
wire should be laid out along Tie Line 9800E with VLF lines run to the east. The
strongest VLF conductors that require geophysical follow-up are located at the following
Picks:

NAA
150-0, 150-P, 150-Q
151-R, 151-S
152-0, 152-P
153-0, 153-P, 153-Q
154-0, 154-P
155-M, 155-N, 155-0

NML
150-M, 150-N, 150-0
151-Q, 151-R, 151-S
152-P, 152-Q
153-0, 153-P, 153-Q, 153-R
154-P, 154-Q
155-N, 155-0

22
List of References

Baker, H.A,. and J.O. Myers, 1979, VLF-EM model studies and some simple quantitative
applications to field results: Geoexploration 17, 55-63

Fraser, D.C., 1969. Contouring of VLF-EM data. Geophysics, 34 958-967

Geonics Ltd., 1997: Operating Manual for VLF Em-16

Karous, M. and Hjelt, S.E., 1983: Linear filtering of VLF dip-angle measurements, Geophysical
Prospecting 31, 782-794

Kociumbas, M.W. and Fardy, D.P. 2012: Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate
Update, for the Dayohessarah Greenstone Belt Lake Property, Ontario, For Harte Gold Corp. 37-
38

McNeil, J.D. and Labson; 1991: Geological Mapping using VLF radio fields. In Nabghian, M.N Ed,
Electrical Methods in Applied Geophysics 11. Soc. Expl. Geoph, 521-640

Sayden, A.S, Boniwell, J.B; 1989: VLF Electromagnetic Method, Canadian Institute of Mining and
Metalurgy, Special Volume 41, 111-125 of VLF-EM Data

Monteiro Santos, F.A; 2013: VLF 2D V1.3 A program for 2D inversion

23
Certificate of Qualifications

I, Shaun Parent, P. Geo . Residing at 282 B Whispering Pines Road, Batchawana Bay, Ontario do
certify that:

1. I am a consulting Geoscientist with Superior Exploration, Adventure & Climbing Co. Ltd.

2. I graduated with a Geological Technician Diploma from Sir Sandford Fleming College in
1986.

3. I graduated with a BSc. from the University of Toronto in 1986

4. I am a member in good standing with the Association of Professional Geoscientists of

Ontario #1955 and a member of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada.

5. I have been employed continuously as a Geoscientist for the past 26 years since my
graduation from University.

6. The nature of my involvement with this project was to carry out the interpretation of
the VLF data using the EMTOMO VLF2D Software of which I have been developing with
Dr. Fernando Santos of Lisbon, Portugal.

Dated this 13th day of July 2017

Shaun Parent, Diploma-Geo, BSc. P. Geo (Limited)

24
APPENDIX A
NAA Figures

25
26