Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How long have you known the applicant and in what capacity?
I have known the applicant since 2006, as his undergraduate degree capstone project
and master degree thesis advisor, and also as his supervisor at Accenture. Philip has
demonstrated his exceptional attributes in academic as well as professional arena. As a
student, he excelled in my Valuation course. His capstone project on estimating the
Catholic Church market value and his master degree thesis on the Brazilian short-term
interest rate were original, effective and impactful. Certainly, he belongs to the top five
percentile among all the students and employees I have already supervised. As a
consultant at XXX ( name of company), he demonstrates excellent analytical capabilities
and strong leadership skills. Also, he has been responsible for several initiatives under
my direct supervision.
I have known Catherine for 1.5 years now. She worked for me for about a year first as an
intern and then as a Junior Analyst. This was full time employment. I was her direct
superior in the Eurasia Area of Responsibulity (AOR)
3. What observations are you able to make with regard to the applicant's
work ethic, intellect, degree of motivation for professional achievement, and
potential for professional growth?
Work ethic is extraordinary, as is motivation. She has a lot of room to grow, especially in
leadership capacity. Her intellect is definitely there, but she can sometimes be reserved
and not let it come out as much as she could.
4. What can you tell us about the applicant's character and personal
qualities? Are there special strengths and weaknesses that we should consider?
Nothing to really say about her character other than she is extremely hard working and
committed to professional advancement. A very warm and decent person. Can be
reserved and shy.
She is a great team player, but rarely does she take the leadership role. I think she is
fine working either in a team or independently. Independently she can focus on a task
and excel without problems, but in a team she can play the role of the facilitator, so she
is really good either way.
STRATFOR is a global intelligence organization that works for a number of Fortune 500
clients and handles a lot of confidential information, much more than most private/legal
businesses. If Catherine was unable to handle confidential information, she would not
have passed our thorough background checks, or earned the trust of analysts at the
company.
7. Please rank the following on a scale of 1 to 5, one being below average and five
being excellent:
8. If the applicant were eligible for rehire, would you rehire him or her?
YES
9. Please indicate below any additional thoughts, comments, or observations that you
believe to be relevant for LEGALSOURCE when evaluating the applicant for
employment:
How long and in what capacity have you known the applicant?
I have already known her for three years since she entered into Capital Medical University. As her
undergraduate tutor, I talked to her with the goal of gaining a better understand the young girl sometimes
and make friends with her, as I did with other students in my group. She enrolled in two of my classes
Chemistry of Chinese Medical Pharmacy and Specialized English from September 2013 to January
2014.
(2)What is your assessment of the applicant's intellectual ability?
Although she is not the most intelligent girl in the class, she has intellectual sophistication on the basis of
world-class education she can undertake. As far as I have observed, Ms. Zhao performed to her capacity
for independent thinking in my class. Since I ve known Zhao in her freshman year, I witnessed exactly
how this talented young lady grew in both academic and research fields.
(3)What is your opinion of the applicant's motivation towards and suitability for a career in the chosen field
of study?
She demonstrated her intense interest in biotechnology on my experiment classes which was developed
in basic medical and chemistry courses. With great enthusiastic in biology and chemistry, talents and
abilities, she is suitable to receive biotechnology education, which made her decide to contribute to the
further development and evolution.
(4)What do you consider the most outstanding characteristics of the applicant?
The course I taught was made up of two parts: theory and experiments. Ms. Zhao showed more interest
for the experimental classes than the theoretical courses. When I asked a question during the experiment
classes, especially when the question was related to how to conduct the entire experiment in an
appropriate and efficient way, she was always the one who could face it down and choose the best
methodology. She really applied the knowledge she gained from the literature and put it into practice.
After finishing an experiment, I could easily see her attitude related to the subject and her participation in
discussion after class of the results and analysis in experiment reports.
(5)What are the major weaknesses of the applicant?
She is stiffness, sensitive and shows her self-consciousness in the process of communicate with people.
So the expression in writing or orally was out of her league sometime. Besides, she is stubborn and not
easily change her mind.
(6)Any additional statements you may wish to make concerning the applicant's capacity for pursuing the
program indicated above.
Ms. Zhao pays attention, has a unique sense of responsibility and cooperates with other members; she
can also do a good job independently. I believe Ms. Zhao possesses all the knowledge, skills, and
abilities needed to become an excellent graduate student in her chosen field; I feel sure she could
become a fine addition to your campus.
Recommendation Letter for Marcus Kee Woon Tan
My replies:
a. How long and in what capacity have you known the applicant?
b. How does the applicant stand out from others in a similar capacity?
Marcus is brilliant, articulate, and a born leader. I put him under star category for his
ability to solve problems and to inspire others. I rate him as one of the top three young
adults I know in his cohort.
In NUS, Marcus was placed in the Accelerated Masters Programme, a highly selective
program that is only offered to the most outstanding undergraduate students. Marcus
produced a thesis that was truly first-rate. His research in microwave technology
involved complex mathematical analysis of novel microwave transmission lines. Using
the conformal mapping technique, he was able to derive simple mathematical equations
of key characteristics of the asymmetric coplanar waveguide. Previously, the
asymmetric coplanar waveguide can only be analysed by using long polynomial
equations (developed by Prof Yamashita) that have to be solved by a computer.
d. Please provide a representative example of how the applicant interacts with other
people.
Marcus has the rare gift of inspiring others. He is a team-player and an asset in any
group task. He knows how to get people going without making them feel pushed.
I see his major weakness as lack of patience. When Marcus was younger, his
impatience could come across as arrogance. Marcus was aware of this problem and
has been making good progress towards correcting this. He is now very sensitive
towards others needs.
f. Please tell us anything else you think we should know about this applicant.
Marcus wants to be a high-tech entrepreneur. This purpose fuels his drive, passion,
and motivation for work. He is so well-read in high-tech businesses that I sometimes
consult him about happenings in the industry (when preparing for my MBA classes). I
believe his determination will make his dream come true.
Marcus is a great leader and communicator. I have no doubt he will assume a senior
management position in the years to come.
Yours truly,
Teck-Hua Ho
William Halford, Jr. Family Professor of Marketing
University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business