Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Give such a definition of Int Law which could cover all the modern trends in it?
3. Discuss the concept of Neutralization. How is it done? Explain the Rights, Duties and
Guarantees given to a Neutralized state.
5. What is meant by 'Subjects of Int Law'? Justify Individuals as the subject of Int Law
by giving appropriate examples.
International Law
Note: Attempt only four questions from part-2.All questions carry equal marks.
Q.1 Define International personality and discuss various entities as International Legal
person.
Q.2 How far do you think that International Law is based on common consent of States?
Evaluate importance of customary law and treaty law as binding in this regard
Q.3 Territory is undoubtedly the basic character of a state as well as widely accepted
elaborate with reference to exclusive rights of states on Land and Air territory.
Q.4 How far has the United Nation succeeded in developing a comprehensive system of
Human Rights protection? Can emphasis on social justice and Human rights lead to a
stable International Order?
Q.5 Define State jurisdiction and explain how domestic jurisdiction can be limited by and
reduced by principles of International Law?
Q.6 keeping in view the objectives of the charter seeking to establish a mechanism of
peace and security how far has United Nations succeeded in confronting changes in
Global society?
Q.7 Describe Importance of diplomacy in interstate relations and discuss the concept of
diplomacy and immunity?
2008
PART-2
Note: Attempt only four questions from part-2.All questions carry equal marks. Extra
attempt of any question or any part of the attempted question will not be considered.
Q.2. John Austin says International Law is not a real Law, but a positive International
Morality. Do you agree with him? Give arguments in support of your answer.
Q.3. Briefly and precisely define SUBJECTS International Law. Do you agree that
INDIVIDUALS can be considered as subjects of International Law? Give appropriate
examples in this regard.
Q.6. Define High Seas. Explain the concept of Freedom of High Seas along-with
restrictions over it.
Q.7. Discuss Recognition. Differentiate between de-jure and de-facto recognition. What
are the disabilities of an unrecognized state?
2007
Q.2 "In the absence of any form of international legislature of democratic states,
international law was said to be based upon the consent of the states upon their
individual acceptance of its principles and rules." Discuss.
Q.6 Coercion against a state renders a Treaty invalid.Discuss main features of the
principles. Also elaborate TWO other methods of rendering invalid the consent of a State
to be bound by a treaty.
Q.7 Explain the various modes of acquiring and losing NATIONALITY. What is DOUBLE
NATIONALITY and STATELESSNESS?
Q.1. International Law is a Law regulating the rights and duties of states and creating
no rights and imposing no duties on individuals. Do u agree with this statement? Why or
why not? Argue.
Q.3. Describe the functions of a Prize Court. What law does it administer?
Q.4. What is the duty of other states in case of internal revolt in an independent state?
Can they help the rebels? Under what circumstances recognition may be accorded to the
rebels?
Q.5. Discuss the extent to which a state can claim jurisdiction over the high seas in war
and peace. Is an appropriation by a state of the underwater soil allowed in International
Law?
Q.6. A Pakistani citizen working in the embassy of a foreign country in Islamabad, has
committed an offence against another Pakistani citizen. The Pakistani police want to
arrest such person. However, the ambassador is refusing to handover the accused to the
police with the plea that the accused has a diplomatic immunity. Do you agree with the
pleas of the ambassador? Why or why not?
Q.7. Whatever the morality of intervention, states have no right under International
Law to intervene on the territory of other states in order to prevent alleged crimes
against humanity or to uphold human rights norms. Discuss.
Q1.Define International Law. Do you agree with John Austins concept International Law
is not a true law, but a positive international morality? Elaborate your answer with
appropriate arguments.
Q2.What are the sources of International Law? Discuss any two of them in detail.
Q3. Discuss the concept of extradition. Explain main principles of extradition. Discuss
also the crimes exempted from extradition.
Q4. What does Subjects of international law mean? Discuss individuals as subjects of
International Law. Elaborate your answer with the appropriate examples.
Q1. Fully explain the duties of a Sovereign State with special reference to:
Q2. Explain how the problem of Hijacking has been dealt with under the International
Law?
Q3. Define Blockade. What are the essentials of real and binding Blockade? What does it
terminate? Refer to leading cases
Q5.How are Prisoners of war to be treated under International Law? Explain with
reference to various conventions.
Q6. The frequent Interventions have challenged the validity of some of fundamental
principles of International Law. What are those principles? Discuss in the light of
interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq by the super-powers.
NOTE: Attempt five questions in all, including question no. 8 which is compulsory. All
questions carry equal marks.
Q1. State the various kinds and classes of diplomatic agents and mention their privileges
and immunities.
Q4. Describe the legal nature of recognition of states, with particular reference to
difference between defacto and Dejure recognition.
Q5. Describe international rivers. State the principles of law, regulating the use of water
and navigation in international rivers.
Q7. State and discuss in brief the various steps mentioned by starke in the creation of
legal obligation by a treaty.
NOTE: Attempt five questions in all, including question no. 8 which is compulsory. All
questions carry equal marks.
Q1. Explain the various modes of acquiring and losing nationality. What is double
Nationality and Statelessness?
Q3. Coercion against a state renders a treaty invalid. Discuss main features of the
principle. Also elaborate two other methods of rendering invalid the consent of a state to
be bound by a treaty.
Q4. State immunity has become a mere fiction which the law can do with out. The
principle is gradually withering away, a process already under way and constantly
gaining momentum. Do you agree? Give reasons in support of your answer.
Q5. Write short note on any four.
(a) Territorial waters
(b) Monroes doctrine
(c) Equality of states
(d) Doctrine of Postliminium
(e) Prize courts
(f) Continuous voyage
Q6. What do you understand by international institutions? Discuss their status and
functions as subject of international law.
NOTE: Attempt five questions in all, including question no. 8 which is compulsory. All
questions carry equal marks.
Q1. Explain in detail the object, purpose and basis of international law.
Q2. Enumerates with short explanation the main principles discussed in any two of the
following cases.
1. Lotus case
2. Clarence Thomas and Anita hill case
3. American diplomat case
Q3. The jurisdiction of international court of justice depends on the consent of the
parties concerned. Discuss.
Q5. Write short notes on any three of the following in the light of convention on the law
of sea 1982 and our maritime zone act of 1976. You must discuss the nature of
jurisdiction, right and duties.
(a) Internal Waters
(b) Continental Shelf
(c) Territorial Waters
(d) Land-locked State
(e) EEZ