Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2009
30 4 Fore ign Language E du cation V o.l 30 No. 4
2009 1
( 200433)
: J. M artin ,
, M. A. K. H a lliday ,
, ;
, ,
, , ,
,
: ; ; ;
: H 030 : A : 1000-5544( 2009) 04-0001-05
Abstrac t: Ever since the A ppra isa l Theory w as pu t forw ard by J. M artin, there have been a lo t o f pub lications about the func-
tion and rea liza tion o f eva luation in language. T hese pub lications have ex tended the study o f interpersonalm eaning from g ram-
m ar to lex is w ith in the theo retical fram ewo rk o f H alliday. s system ic- func tiona l lingu istics. H ow eve r, they seem to have two
lim itations. F irst they look at evalua tion m a in ly from the interpe rsonal perspective w ithout g iv ing adequate consideration to o th-
e r perspectives such as the idea tiona .l A nd second, they fo cus their attention on explicit eva luation w ith im p licit eva luation
larg ely igno red. T his paper attem pts to ex am ine the sign ificance and realization o f im p lic it evalua tion from the idea tiona l per-
spective, .i e. how the speake rs express their attitude, make the ir judgment and show the ir apprec iation through the use o f
seem ing ly purely descriptive wo rds and sem antic structures in transitiv ity, so as to prove the im portance o f im p lic it eva luation
in the further deve lopm ent of the A ppraisa l Theory.
K ey word s: appra isal theory; lim itation; im p licit eva luation; trans itiv ity
[ C ]. Cam bridge: Cam bridge S cholars Pub lish ing, 2008: 27-54.
, ,
: , ,
: ,
, ,
,
,
2009-01-01
,
# 5#