RRR RIDEAF HEN, AIX SBARBRS = WR. UWHLHET ERAT RARE RPRBEXMASMAEAHE, BEEK EKEDERKEAGRBRBD, WEREXEMERMRRER, UTAH 48 (performance data) HAAR, AWE THE, ARNT, PAPI HEEL. 34, SHFRMRRERPBREXRERM-FMS, BHA AQP GALE, Rt SETERARLES HRS HTA A EMSS. RE RHRABTERBERA, THRONES, HG RET ERR HK ARE, PEAKS: 10-06 SRARIR: A BAFHRALATARAG FERNS AHP. ELEXMSWEXLELTRNA ABEQM, SHAK ARRAEMR WSPARAR ALOMOULEAYM ERRSPHBREXSBHENASH, Ht RULLORAD ES RARA SPH RY 2S. HUBS FURARHRMRBS. 1 cowamamuamexinn HLRAAFR ROAM, LR AUROM, HERE IRRAROET Bah EELF RASS RL SARFAB OO 2X08, TEESE, FEST. SMW: SHEL, SHEX, PARTE SHAMS: 1672-9382 (2010) 04-0090-08 RENESAS, MOLERRSA ORAXRSRAMS HED ES 0M SRR LAR, Wik —AR REE R. R= ANYAAMMT LEA AME. NERA, HARTA 32 ( peech community ) FFSt FIA. BRN. FRMFRAREA, RAK MSERHTARERARR, ATBETE WA FVRIATENR (Saussure, 1966) . 28 i, RAR, BAMARRRMKA RAM. HEM, CARER FER, BRORRKRE AM ABS RRR AKRARHSSSLAKL SHAE, RE EEBSLRERSAANAE ALE.EX M9? VSMARW—RATHN AR, 20 A He TN B— AM—F PORES NERA READ RERMRRRE, THOR RR AVAL Wik, {MONTREAL ( phrase structure rules), #244 8998i83% ( universal grammar, UG) BHR, WHAT 852 RES DRT RNEN. WRB Rud, BAPEFAMHABZL RSESPLATRARAA TRADES SHAKE, HEAMUAER AS ETE (intuition ) #2794 ( introspection } #938HE% SERB MEI (Chomsky, 1965; 20) . NEFRUHRRARBRAAKES, BH AQERERCABE, AER ER ( MAlien & Seidenberg, 1999) Mia AWARD Fo TAMBOR. USES AOUBHARERIS. DEIBER A HET, BANE TERE", RERRRSSRRMBRE. AHTEX AERAADER TPES DRS 8, BAR PREM R Chet Tas WEAHS. FALL, Vilem Mathesius ( 1882—1946 ) FiJohn R. Firth ( 1890— 1960) BER AESE AAAI (HE H, 1909), MALREEMR RAIL. SRA EE AE S, RAUBAES HERS HOTA IEE SHER T RAUS | WH, 2004), WAREMERA, FSUIA RE BATA, BLI-PR-TARH MM A, 1959%, fe%A#Randolf Quirk RRB T “KGB XAR" (The Survey of English, SEU) GE, Ait MHRA MI EN, 1964, MERRE MAME Bl, *BAX% ( Brown University ) S—its RMT BBA F10077 A MBrown Corpus. Et#270%#, &G. Leech, S. Johansson AIH, Hofland=Awpe), RH MLancasterz 5 WaLNOsloxRMBorgonAXA rR 7 -SBrown Corpus SMRHLOBERE, ARR ERB OE. 1975% DW. Svartvikh MHS ERATE OSH, AF RAT S-+REOBBNE London-Lund Corpus (LLC). AB bite 90442, Leech ( 1991; 9) HMR, BE BOBARABARH A, LLCESHES fete". Zit, AREAS SOE RR, MSRM HRS ( British National Corpus) . 2i83ci ( Bank of English) #HSERACBHBHBIEN, A AAMT A, ABZL, BRT 20S AHL —REAMG ESRB, B OREN EROEH, AM RIB AHA R. RABSFR, ASME ENES: FRARAPARAENT ME, ROME SHASHLEAS. Ni, BARBS AMERSEEERET EA, LBRA NA MAEHK+EEARMORRE ADR BREA TR" (RET, 2002). SSH FUME ALBA, SE HERP ARBRE TUN ROA AMPARFARFR HARA. BAB EPMA LAE — AMARA (Leech, 1991), RE-BEARNRKA LER ‘PRR MBAR. Svartvik (1996) HH, 1B NGLERAER, CHLA—HAM, HA HE-PMHGFERAL. SLRARRR Michael Rundell ( 2008) iA%, “ARRAS WAC AGES SF ab EM 7 hy OH, RABSPAROLARM’. Cermak (2003) 15, SEO S HERPRBAK". RAWMBRHRRAD Halliday (1993; 24) tak, “ARERR FORUM TEER AT eR", RINT WRHERRET 4 BROURESSERO HE, CE XS, PERATANRET SAP MIRRABAD. BR AUBRRE, WERT RR TE BRae sh A"; THAR, BRSAMEN GORY, SEAR, ANTE RAMBS ( MEHTA ) ABR Re. THOU ARMA A MARRS RATA ME, CHET ARR #8” ( McEnery & Wilson, 1996 ) A7HNF HAT, MAMBO UAI, REE Bu A TNA TAP RAMORUEIR” ( Teubert, 2005) BRMAAHHMRR. 2 serxsentxmon RIRSSSELAHRR, RARV A, BARHSH. MAH. RH, WH ADAM, FH. ARH, BERETS 2h, RHERAN- BMH, RRB A, HABAMAAROAATBD, 884 UBRAFATR, A-BOUSBARE Nk. HA, “SHRREBA HA” ( $23) AMES, 1999). XFPmBAOBZIT 91 Gesoiaeaio eal So WHR, RATA, RSH. ER (8, TBARS Arh, AHEM ( Saussure, 1996) . 82EMRHARAS CAE) , ABEL TERRRRT ( , feo), Sa RAZ AAT LNATAEL, BARRE ERLE MSNL CARER RE TIC SAR, LTA, RAROARRER HHS RA ARR, SRE MRSA RABAT EA ABM, VA-MESMRBART RE, 1B ERAGE AMES R MS OEE Ti, AURA MEADS AR 8. BTRANEA, ASHEN, AS EGRMA-BISEANEN, BRER HEFRERAAATA MAMAN T BRE RRR RADA. HRM SERED OTR MER, U8 “SU RIEEE AE — TEEN, BAN Fi AIEEE GEBIAR ( observed use of language ) "48-5958 2518 eat tk ( surely cannot constitute the subject-matter of linguistics)"; MiBCHVMAEH, “RIN RUMKRERARE, KARIM S HS HRB, TATRA (much of the actual speech observed consists of fragments ‘and deviant expressions of a variety of sorts )” (Chomsky, 1965; 4, 201). REZ, Aff ABA AAORIRA GORE, 8-860 SPB, SUM MRS AR 7 ASL TA Es Ti, RHA ASA Boe 1, RRR T RAE. PRELARIREARERT HE ft, SMMRAAC HER. HINA SERA AER. RARER 4, RATTAN HS BE HEU AE (Chomsky, 1965: 20). 7WRAM, RUBE PRACRT RARER EER O. RETMRBEN, BAHD AAA” (Chomsky, 1965; 4) BABA. fi FRAARUBLOA, MERA, FEAABPARANR, HAH, RETREAT, RACER Sb—KOF, HARE OT REL —BE RRNGRAOMM. ARR, HAE AR, THOR AMUN BEANE EAT #, A-AHRAS HBR STEBAZ CL, abit —H IAEA aA BARRO ABATE, FARIS ARADM. EfBeaugrande (2002) Frikiim 4, PERERA CRAMER ARORA RTE, RA RRITMB A FREE EAUA EA ONR EASA REA", Buk ei RAI eR HEARNE A. REE Cae aie, He FRENGAN- RAR, ATRL BWA ( Beaugrande, 2002) . REZ, BABAR ( Beaugrandelé ) 24 CRETHAMMRRAAS L, UMA CRE (BRU, MRCS, sas AERIS, BUSTS ARE LOATH, RRA. ADNSHAWARERGATB—B, As WEAWRRRAAR, RWHRUAARY Rie RAOES LAT RTREAS, 7 CERIO A I. 1, MURA RBIS SAMMI, WITT HEM, BARAT ARRAS SERNAME RR? WL, HER Ee REEL ETARAGERTANAS KAVAERR, OIRAR DOES EER R, MAARRA CRRA RYT SSB, SERENA HEE EES HE (empiricism) » EMRRESI RR i (1997, 145) AFIRESBRE, “HNO HUM RONG, ARH, RFR TESE 2". MMNSHE VERSE AH — 1 RARE IR, TA EMIT RAO. PMH YH ER BURSA, RR DERE RH RHA. MNFLAMGRERR, SHE SGA NSBR Ar BASE PTA BR, RANA ARETE, SHE LMERELABR PROT HIBREA. MBSR, VATMARE— HGMACSRDEARNARBAOEX NL, EFFI A ALS RA A BORA RRMA (Cermak, 2003), iF SPER L SSE NOMBRE #, Beaugrande ( 2002) ASHE*RE HALA ARBRE (field linguists ) HBABSFR (homework linguists) , ToFilimore ( 1992) bis Reba is AER ( armchair linguists ) FABER ( field linguists ) REAR MALIA REE EI. Lager (1995) S)310.5BR ia Rae AR CRRPR MER ARE ER, FENN BPP T TEE (REN)1 BERSERK S BARE SFRSENM ( 318 Lager, 1995) BASBSER HBAFR FRAR A NEATH ARMA BS WHATS EEK PR WE AB LEP OI BA Am | DLA a AO BO BA FRAENRERD, SERARK OA ARGH HDR WAT MRAMRTR, BARAT AEH BARRERA, HGR RR RH EY KBRE (noise) SME RHE, SAR MRRA, se BURR, MBAR SRD RARER RIE IE RBM E LHe REE Xe XA MEP CXR SECGRE SHEER bi Ayat 38 183 (Universal Grammar) 3H) RAB EBR FRB ABR PRBRX RRA, BRK RXAW AME, UK H so m2 e FRGR ERIK (FERPA) ha Pt (Ra) SORE GM FABRE RT HE RARER (BOR, BERR, STH 8) ame RHEE EAR READ ASRRIH BEADIP REN KR IER Hk, RAAT IEA” PBALE, DADREREHT HAA BRIE RE SE A RILM (Discovery procedures) HAAN KORE ENA ERSTE FRX SRS Oh, ET ALA Tie PRAM MAL, BATH Ba, BE HARA AHR IT A RRS it NALA MPASCALR.CE DT SMBH KA PrologRLispis T GR, FARFERFRRBRHMAE RMA o FRR, BHEXMBHERH RE, REFRBARHRELHA ROR RAAAHURTT RM, FAT SHEE SSLOARRBAA SHIRA RR matt. KK, PPK NEMA SUTIN HEAR ART, BEX, ALBA MABRLABSY PRKEHTR. LPRSPREMRAA) SABRE NARA RHE. BHAA SMR REBRAILIE MK, BE GERAD) WEE ES 5h) OGRA EAIA, ANE RR, BRPRRHM REL OBA (i Bt) WEB ( BERGA) AtAM. EM Leech (1992) Aria, “MALLE, A NRE REA SES A 2 le Ie 8, HAMSATRL— EM. BETWE MH-HLBRR, LTABRATERAS HESSD, CRARHRM AA, doi AAS LSBEZA IRAE ERROR SR". Bll, DMRS R A, RAF RONPRURESEOAK. BSYRRE BEHBEY, HTREAEOBES, TE ARSZOREMRAMEIME (HR, 2000), MAMMA DHER TA, 3] Fidohansson (1992; 334) fi8, “WHiA# RRA DARIAN BRE, TE AE HBAERMEAAORR, BSHAA RAM ML DAI". BER BASSE", BARBRR, ORNS BARRUEARTSH, HEAR L, ERAERRARBS HEM (PH, 2002) » BR, RtAAHAASRAHAH, WRBRTEAONA, HA, RTT SAME BTA MP URMH LE. KF EMARMELARAA, Bunge ( 1995) w (ERE RA, EMOTES I HAARE, MHZLWAEMRAD TAME. BRRTORRAR— ROAM, SLRS 93,BR. Ail, AVRO, RETR.” TR, HBRELHERAMBEERHE HOMBSR, HEANFESEHRR, RE, PARANA Mat MRS TE ARNRE, BAPSRRPALORAM, FH SHAPFRAARCAHSASRAAR. 3 stexsenexnms SAMEHE, HTRRMRR, BH MAC RHLELEFARANF HALE X, AHALEHRREABE, RKB ALE SRSRAHENSS SHARAN 9 (RAMA, 2003). BIE KRM P HS WSLOReSeHAREE LSE, AT 20, BREXSHLELHAOMANR Ai AS (AB, 2003). RAPBABEHKM, R. ARMS Mt UFSMBSADTF AROSE? US W, CRUSH, CANRRBEEXLABH AM, EFHELATERRALRBSRH, FERA BERRA A HBF 8, UAE-SHAA, WRR—M, UE SRCMRAEH. MA, MMSE THREE RAAGAES. Grishman (1986) kA, BARBS H—TA RA DREAMER FRR HSER. SSR ASRS. Aarts ( 1992) WHE AFABS FR NMERAOREA, EK BSFRATARAR-RBAMM, HED SRPARMEL- BARN, BURA RACK ANTMSABALERASTR RHRHBA. BR, LLAMA PRHRRSRASSRRHARRBES: Ro MEPHMRS, RAHAT EE X5SBE2XHME. Beaugrande (2002) RESASUARL, LARUE ARE REAR, BT 2a WOHAR, SRUEAFSSABSLA =A. Fillmore (1992) kA, DRAB BFRSRMBRSERAEMKIMG, BAR RELRLGSERHAMMSEM AR, McEnery & Wilson ( 1996) *i\2, FH HRAARSRT RAAB SH 2 HTH R, ARRRO HIME. EMA AEH, RA (1997) BB RIARERAMABS EC SBSBK (OK 1, HSB" A RETO HRI AA. WAAR OREO HE, FABL RACER, WARBLER) f" R, RARLELT LP HERO HRA, EKERFRCSRSRERELRS, HER (2003 ) A MBWABICR—P Bah Ath HR, POREM—TARER RANE RH (2000) BBAMBAEE WARCHEARKARP HEM, TKEE Kk. SHARARLGTAAS, HE ERGS, ARRERFHRR. SLAB, BAMHREFRERED UREEEE RABRSE LAT DRAFT WAFHRR, ALAA HARRRALA HHUELARERS, RERATHEAN HRMROMBSHATAR, RARBK HOES AMR GRE ALAM ( Cermak, 2003), boa ate. MFRELD RSBREXARHEAKAAS ( Klavans & Resnik, 1996), HHEXMBHE NHR BORTRHSSTANERAS, 4 avnenazan ENREASRRABASHAHEE Aik, HPEPARAHTLMSHEX, BEG. EXBBHEXLMBRENS AR AHAM, AAAKLHHBHKEOHRR. BHEELMSREXHHRBAD APOE S. ERAMHESH, HNEAFHREH HPERAMEM. AORN, (1) BARBS SHRRB BRR URESSH-LRATM, HUBBERS ZORRO SHE XBSROBSS A BZNK RBA, FORA DMRS HAR SHRM RMRL TBR SREZARROM B (HEHE, 2004) , Aitchison WHEE AMES RD TRIER, AL MUAPRARA SA MRS ARM HR @; BREDA, EAARBRRE-* AR, HABA TAR, BRTEIT ( H SIBHERH, 2004). 0S, MEY PENS SEHR, 1B SASSI AMMAR TR, AEM WMVURHESWSBRRE— TERR. RR tH A HB AO TEI HORM, MARLEE BRR SE FRAMERS. BRERA BHBARFRE: (STR) RRR (ASB BRH ) MER - aK - ©, REERECORMEL ALAR,LATED, L-RTOM ARE HELMBRE LHD, (2) SARTRE LAER MABNEM Ew OM, ST RHAAREE LANE. MERE ORREM LE, RAE ART DUNS 2, RBA SERA ( corpus-driven approach) , &:FiGNsEI7% (corpus- based approach) MBM MLH MAI (corpus-supported approach) » ia /#3E ARETE, HE REMMFLOUAACTRR. RENE irks ( MURA STNNBD ) HLA CARR, PRGA AB IO MoE GE. ENELAM ARERR EAE %, GERRBOH MENS a RHE Ho FA IRAN AH A EE 2, URAL, MENERHOT RAR HMR, MRNSHAMS HER, f ORR, Bit, ADLER, RF BAER SMARA ROTI. (3) SORA AR RA ARR RERAP HTML ARES RABBEL OBS, LAM RFE AE RR. DAHER (POS tagger) HB. KEGRAATS, DARGIS ART. Ath (rule-based ) HUE FLEHIS ( statistically- based ) AAA ( Juratsky & Martin, 2000 ) SEF AUR ES STI IR THRE Bh RNS SAUCM OUR, RA RE ALM S H— RAR RM MAH A BEM ATR ARRRT SR EXMSU, HADI AL BERG, AER SDLEREBARR PHAR. ERT ARM BRALABEADHALHBAAR, HE PEATE, VARIA attIRES. AMREARBRES, MEST CRHFRAEXHKTAMASHAES RHF SVEXHRT RMP RAS 32% (Cermak, 2003) . Hein, BrillisteRt BBAA—TRF ARMM (Brill, 1992) , MISHRA T AF ER SI ES (Brill & Wu, 1998) , HAVRE ( 1999) HUA, HRMS RRM RT R URE TR, BRR RTA “STRIP AES, RMLTBHE NRE RAMS. ROBSRE ROR, BS RERMELTRHARAA, Brill & Mooney (1997) thiA%, SSA MALES ME NUH AE HE NE 2 AES BK, WANES HARE, RATAN (2002 ) thik, SRAERAE—1 a CERES ERT NB RI A BRSSBE RR SBA SORTA BAS BS, “RBREXAARMAELT RAR BeHTETR. (4) SHARMERARARAHRRD ADEA ROME RAE RELATES RK SHERARBR, RANAGERESRE DH, MERHBRE XMS ORE RAK HRS RES ABE BAFRERARHRENEORE ( 0 SA) FOr ( BOREAS Shas ), FRET EARS AR (Beaugrande, 2002) . StH SET aE) AMEMRMBARES AB, EMA] DEMIR MEA ECWIRE EA. i, ERARARA EMA RET B ORLA RLAAATK, MARR ie, TSA MUA SES aT ONL 5. ERARAARHRERABERRHE BE, HELFRUMSRA ABTS ROMERO, MARTA AMMAR. EDR FR, PREIS A, MENS. LBA. RF. Wa YE, PERREMRALHS HMA. UFRHBAERS, SHARAD ERATH AEKAHORAANG, ARRAS SH AP, BEENSSEE MBA BREE PRALMEMART ARABS PRRHAS PRATER A NBER (BK @[35)) . RADNER ARE EXSBRERHABSHBRE (5) OHSS ERA HOME ANE aRRE, DET PERAK, WEMBHEAMAERR BFR, CHAR, CRAFTS M, WABALWESHRES RHODE i, REDRAT OAD AAA Me i. ERRNER HAIRS, HESERO ‘BEN, ENOBMARSEMAsRRO MWA. BH, ABD ASSEN ( in RAGAREAA, RGLH, SSRN =) $2ROST OREN, CAT OBEN ACREERTROBN, AABN O PRAGA FRR, IMRT 95Ra Ga Sta NO) RANTS HARPER. (6) PHERRARBHEBRSOESS SPAPAR 2a AFRAL-ORRHLS EM, CBR AALFMAHUSAMZS, ALBA RH AMES LNMAS, BRABUS ARE PRRAASAMREMNCBAMRAT fe, MBBS TAREE AOA SHR HRAA, EEE, EASRRHREBRSY SEND HL ACSA ARENAS, BNEEUMBS* ( MBarnden et al., 2001% ) . #2iBE% ( tnkjellmer, 1986; Holmes, 194%) . ii ( iStenstom, 1986% ) . (4818S ( iGarnham et al. 40} ) SRA BAR ARLE. Mil, RR (2009) HRARHRMLBSRAS LRBORMATOAMRBERR, St 60.2%HRBELERF ARRAS, ARF EAP AD LEMS STE REROHTRAA. TL, BARAK SPHREPLSN SHABBAT Z. 4 ax tLABSFRRLABEEX SSE EXSHHHL, SOHERAM MESH BA, BASRA SSARAAAMTSS FRAEAAR. BASS RRMA Shah ABS HERFARAK arene. O ae O AEE RIESAL RS — MOTE (Hae S: O9BYVOSI)ITEH, BNE Sate [1] Aarts, J. Intuition-based and observation-based grammars [A]. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik {C]. London: Longman, 1992: 44-62 (2) Alien, 1 & M. 8, Seidenberg. The emergence of ‘grammaticality in connectionist networks [A]. B. MacWhinney(ed). The Emergence of Language [C]. Ni: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1999: 115-152. [3] Barnden, J., M. Lee, & K. Markert (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on corpus: based and processing approaches to figurative language [C]. University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language technical papers; ¥. 14, special isue. Lancaster: UCREL, 2001 [4] Beaugrande, R. Descriptive Linguistics at the Millennium: Corpus Data as Authentic Language (J). Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2002, Vol 1): 91-131. [5] Brill, E. A simple rule-based partofspeech tagger [A]. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (C]. ‘Trento, Italy, 1992: 152-155, (6) Brill, E. and J. Wu, Classifier combination for improved lexical disambiguation [A], Proceedings of the 17th international ‘conference on Computational linguistics, Vol 1 [Cl] Associaton for Computational Linguistic, 1998: 191-195. (7) Brill, B. and R. Mooney. An overview of empirical natural enguage processing - Natural Language Processing [J]. AT Magazine, Winter 1997, 184: 13-24 (8) Bunge, M. Quality, quantity, pseudoquantity and measurement in social science (J). Journal of. Quantitative Linguistics, 1995, Vol 2(1) 1-10 [2] Cermak, F. Today’s Corpus Linguistics: Some Open Questions [J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2008, Vol 12): 265-282. [U0] Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (iM). Cambridge: MIT, 1965. [11] Fillmore, C. J. “Corpus linguistics” or “Computer-aided armchair linguistics” [A]. J Svartvik(ed). Directions in Corpus Linguistics {C}. Bern: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992: 35-60. [12] Garnham, A., R. Shllock, G. Brown, A. Mill & A. Cutler, Slips of the tongue inthe London Lund Corpus of spontaneous conversation [1 Linguistics, 1981, (19: 805-817. [13] Grishmen, R. Computational Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1986 [14] Halliday, M. A. K, Quantitative Studies and Probabilities in Grammar [A]. In M. Hoey(ed) Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on English Language in Honour of John Sinclair(on his sttieth birthday){C). London: Harper Collin, 1993: 1-25 {15} Holmes, J, Inferring language change from Computer Corpora: Some methodological problems 0}. ICAME fora, 194, 18, pe}: 27-40 {16} Johansson, S. Comments on & paper by StaffanHellberg {Al In J. Svartvik(ed). Directions in Corpus Linguistics (C). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992: 332-334, [17] Jurafsky, D. & J. Martin. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to ‘Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics and Speech Recognition (MJ, NI: Prentice Hall, 2000. [18] Kjellmer, G."The lesser man"; observations ‘on the role of women in modern English ings(A]. In J. Aarts & W. Meijs (eds). Corpus Linguistics It (C}. Amsterdam: Rosopi, 1986: 163-176 [19] Klavans, J. & P. Resnik. The Balancing Act [M) ‘Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996. (20) Lager, T. A Logical Approach to Computational Corpus Linguistics (D]. Gothenburg Monograph in Linguistics 14. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Gothenburg, 1995. [21] Leech, G. The state ofthe art in corpus inguisties [A]. K. Aijmer & B, Altenberg (eds). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartik [C), London: Longman, 1991: 8-29, {22] Leech G. Corpora and theories of linguistic performance (Al. In J. Svartvik(ed). Directions in Corpus Linguistics (C). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992: 105-122. (23) MeEnery, 7: & A. Wilson. Corpus Linguistics [MI Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1996. (24) Rundell, M. The corpus ofthe future and the future of the corpus [OL]. Paper delivered at special conference on*New Trends in Reference Science”, University of Exeter (ip: www rut rice edu/-bariowfuterp.html, 2008412 2041 iD) {25} Saussure, F. de. Course in General Linguistics (M), Translated by Wade Baskin, New York: McGraw-Hill, 196. {26] Stenstém, A. Discourse tags [A]. In J. Aarts. & W. Meijs (eds). Corpus linguisties 1! (C). ‘Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1986: 203-218. [27 Svartvik, J. Corpora are becoming mainstream [Al 5. Thomas. & M. Short (eds). Using Corpora for Language Research (C]. London: Longman, 1996: 3-13. [28] Teubert, W. My version of corpus linguistics (U). Imternational Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2005, 10(1: 1-13 (29) PH. iA AUR SE 2 3 Pa POA OIRIC U]. NBER, 2003, (3): $7.62, (30) eh. Dum aan BOESDIR, 2004, (1):3-9. BI RAS, Sei. GAB Ashe RS ELD [0]. INERE SHR, 2002, (3): 180-187. [32] Sin. + tomo Fee UO). EARTHED, 1999, (1) 83-85. (33) RBS, oct SUOMI? 1) 1-FEELELFEA 2002, 24): 7-8. 4] FOR. BeHOUTR PIE ERE AOBEAE [J]. ORAL, 2002, (5): 126-131 (35) Seem. AERA SOM), HRT. 4k FR: PL SAF HA, 1997. (36) cee RS AMORA [Bethe SS PNEPBPIR, 2001, (2): 1-5. (37) Amba. APRA FOIE AEE JETER ABET (J). ALATICIA, 2003, 2): 89-92. (38) re, ik ARE SHAE (1). 7h 1B, 2000, (3):2.9 D9) FAH. ASTER RH. HE 4 PERERA P AAS [0 hiBWIAE SEF, 2009 (4). [40] GePUOL, BAe RIC SHAH [I]. SACI 1B, 1997, (3): 27-32. [61] WER. RIDA PRUNE Ae ‘8, 2005, (6) 45-55. ASL (0). SME Rationalism, Empiricism and Corpus Linguistics Abstract: The history of linguistics in the 20° century witnessed the opposition and convergence of Rationalism and Empiricism. While Ratonalsts draw on their introspection to interpret linguistic phenomenon, Empiricists advocate that language be described and theories be formulated on the basis of performance data drawn from the language in actual use. Today, Rationalism and Empiricism in linguistics are converging to an ever ‘more intense extent, and research methodology in linguistics is inevitably to be dominated by a mixed approach combining empirical methods and ingiss? introspection. Language corpora have become testbeds for linguists’ intuitions and important resources to improve theories with. This tendency ‘will ead to a series of changes in linguistics. Key Words: Rationalism; Empiricism; corpus linguistics 97,