Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARED BY
J.PREETHA ROSELYN
(AP/Sr.G/EEE)
1. Syllabus
2. Mapping of Program Outcomes with Instructional Objectives
3. Mapping of Program Educational Objectives with Program Outcomes
4. Session plan
5. Laboratory policies & Report format.
6. Evaluation sheet
7. Each experiment should be prefixed with prelab questions
with answer key and suffixed with post lab questions with
answer key.
Syllabus
INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES
At the end of course the students will be able to:
1. Acquire skills of using computer packages MATLAB coding and SIMULINK in power
electronics and power system studies.
2. Acquire skills of using ETAP software for power system studies.
LIST OF EXPERIMENTS
TOTAL
REFERENCE
Laboratory Manual
Program Outcomes Acquire skills Acquire skills of using computer Acquire skills of
of using packages MATLAB /SIMULINK using ETAP software
computer in Power Electronics studies. for Power System
packages studies
MATLAB
coding in
Power
System
studies
a)An ability to apply X X X
knowledge of
mathematics, science,
and engineering.
b) An ability to design X X X
and conduct
experiments, as well as
to analyze and interpret
results.
c)An ability to design a X X
system, component, or
process to meet desired
needs within realistic
constraints such as
economic,environment
al,social, political,
ethical, health and
safety,
manufacturability, and
sustainability.
e)An ability to identify, X X
formulate, and solve
engineering problems
h)The broad education X X X
necessary to understand
the impact of
engineering solutions
in a global perspective
Mapping of Program
Educational Objectives with
Program Outcomes
1 2 3 4
COURSE : EE0405
CREDIT : 02
Outcomes
Students who have successfully completed this course
Instructional Objective Program outcome
The students will be able to: a)An ability to apply knowledge of
mathematics, science, and engineering
1. Acquire skills of using computer packages b) An ability to design and conduct
MATLAB coding and SIMULINK in experiments, as well as to analyze and
Power Electronics and Power System interpret results.
studies. c)An ability to design a system,
2. Acquire skills of using ETAP software for component, or process to meet desired
Power System Studies. needs within realistic constraints such
as economic,environmental,social,
political, ethical, health and safety,
manufacturability, and sustainability.
e)An ability to identify, formulate, and
solve engineering problems
h)The broad education necessary to
understand the impact of engineering
solutions in a global perspective
www.power-analysis.com
www.4shared.com/power system analysis
www.power-electronics.com
Professional component:
General - 0%
Basic Sciences - 0%
Engineering sciences & Technical arts - 0%
Professional subject - 100%
Session Plan:
EVALUATION METHOD:
Prelab Test - 5%
Inlab Performance - 35%
Postlab Test - 5%
Attendance - 5%
Record - 10%
Model Exam - 15%
Final Exam - 25%
Total - 100%
Prelab Questions - 5%
Preparation of observation/Record 10%
Model Calculation - 10%
Execution - 15%
Postlab Questions - 5%
Attendance - 5%
Model Exam - 25%
University Exam - 25%
Total - 100%
5. Reports Due Dates: Reports should be submitted immediately after next week of the
experiment. A late lab report will have 20% of the points deducted for being one day late.
If a report is 3 days late, a grade of 0 will be assigned.
6. Systems of Tests: Regular laboratory class work over the full semester will carry a
weightage of 75%. The remaining 25% weightage will be given by conducting an end
semester practical examination for every individual student. Prelab questions will be
asked at the beginning of each cycle as a viva-voce and the post lab questions should be
available in the observation and record after the completion of the experiment.
Register Number :
Date of Experiment :
Date of submission :
Aim:
To simulate the 1 half controlled rectifier circuit with R & RL load and obtain the
corresponding waveforms using MATLAB/SIMULINK.
Formulae used:
Circuit Diagram:
Model Graph:
Resistive Load
Inductive load:
Result:
Thus the Single Phase half controlled Rectifier with R & RL Load circuit is simulated using
MATLAB/SIMULINK and the corresponding waveforms are obtained.
S.NO.2
Single Phase Full Wave Rectifier with R & RL Load
Aim:
To simulate the 1 fully Controlled rectifier circuit with R & RL load and obtain the
corresponding waveforms using MATLAB/SIMULINK.
Formulae used:
Average dc voltage, Vdc=Vm(1+cos) (volts)
Rms output voltage,Vrms=Vm ((-)+sin2/2)1/2 (volts)
2
Average output current, Idc=Vdc/R (Amps)
RMS output current, Irms=Vrms/R (Amps)
Where,
Vm is the maximum input voltage
is the firing angle of the SCR.
Operation:
The phase controlled rectifiers using SCRs are used to obtain controlled dc output voltages from
the fixed ac mains input voltage. The circuit diagram of a fully controlled converter is shown in
Figure 2. The output voltage is varied by controlling the firing angle of SCRs. The single phase
fully controlled converter consists of four SCRs. During positive half cycle, SCR1 and SCR 2
are forward biased. Current flows through the load when SCR1 and SCR2 is triggered into
conduction. During negative half cycle, SCR3 and SCR4 are forward biased. If the load is
resistive, the load voltage and load current are similar.
When the load is inductive, SCR1 and SCR2 conduct from to . The nature of the load
current depends on the values of R and L in the inductive load. Because of the inductance, the
load current keeps on increasing and becomes maximum at . At , the supply voltage reverses
but SCRs 1 and 2 does not turn off. This is because the load inductance does not allow the
current to go to zero instantly. Thus the energy stored in the inductance flows against the supply
mains. The output voltage is negative from to + since supply voltage is negative.
Circuit Diagram:
Model Graph:
Resistive load
Inductive load :
Result:
Thus the Single Phase fully controlled Rectifier with R & RL Load circuit is simulated using
MATLAB/SIMULINK and the corresponding waveforms are obtained.
S.NO.3
To simulate the 3 fully Controlled rectifier circuit with R & RL load and obtain the
corresponding waveforms using MATLAB/SIMULINK
Theory:
The three phase full bridge converter works as three phase AC-DC converter for firing angle
delay 00<900 and as three phase line commutated inverter for 900<<1800. The numbering of
SCRs 1, 3, 5 for the positive group and 2, 4, 6 for negative group. This numbering scheme is
adopted here as it agrees with the sequence of gating of six thyristors in a 3-phase full converter.
Here each SCR is conduct for 1200. At any time two SCRs, one from positive group and
other from negative group must conduct together and this combination must conduct for 600.this
means commutation occurs for every 600. For ABC phase sequence of three phase supply
thyristors conduct in pairs: T1 and T2, T2 and T3, T3 and T4, T4 and T5, T5 and T6, T6 and T1.
Period, range of 2 SCR Pair in conduction
+ 30 to + 90 S1 and S6
+ 90 to + 150 S1 and S2
+ 150 to + 210 S2 and S3
+ 210 to + 270 S3 and S4
+ 270 to + 330 S4 and S5
+ 330 to + 360 and + 0 to + 30 S5 and S6
Formulae used:
Circuit Diagram:
Model Graph:
Resistive load:
Inductive load:
Result:
Thus the three phase fully controlled Rectifier with R & RL Load circuit is simulated using
MATLAB/SIMULINK and the corresponding waveforms are obtained.
S.NO.4
Theory:
AC regulators are used to get variable AC voltage from the fixed mains voltage. Some of the
important applications of AC regulators are: domestic and industrial heating, induction heating in
metallurgical industries, induction motor speed control for fan and pump drives, transformer tap
changers in utility systems, static reactive power compensators, lighting control etc., Earlier, auto
transformers, transformers with taps and magnetic amplifiers were employed in these
applications because of high efficiency, compact size, flexibility in control etc. Two thyristors in
anti parallel are employed for full wave control. In this case, isolation between control and power
circuit is most essential because of the fact that the cathodes of the two thyristors are connected
to the common point. For low power applications, a triac may be used. In this case isolation
between control and power circuitry is not necessary.
Formulae Used:
The triggering pulse is generated at the point at which the associated cosine wave becomes
instantaneously equal to the control voltage.
In other words,
2V sin (-t) = VR
At this instant t= and hence
2V sin (-) = VR
= - sin- (VR/2V)
R max=22V/CVR
Where, VR- breakdown voltage of the Diac
- firing angle delay
V- Supply voltage
Circuit Diagram:
RL
R MT2
AC
line
RD MT1
G
MT1 MT2
C
Operation:
A triac control circuit for lamp dimmers is shown in Fig.1. A diac is a gateless triac designed to
breakdown at a low voltage. During the positive half cycle, the triac requires a positive gate
pulse for turning it on. This is provided by the capacitor C. When its voltage is above the
breakdown voltage of the diac, the capacitor C discharges through the triac gate. When the triac
turns on, the capacitor Voltage will be reset to zero. A similar operation takes place in the
negative half cycles, and a negative gate pulse will be applied when the diac breaks down in the
reverse direction. Adjustment of series resistance, R determines the charging rate of capacitor C
and hence the value of the phase angle delay. The output power and thus light intensity are
varied by controlling the phase of conduction of the triac.
Model
Graph:
VS
wt
V0
wt
Result:
Thus the 1 AC Voltage regulator with R load circuit is executed with the help of MATLAB
software and the graph is plotted.
S.NO.5
Aim:
To develop a computer program to form the bus admittance matrix, Ybus of a power system.
Theory:
The Ybus /Zbus matrix constitutes the models of the passive portions of the power network. Ybus
matrix is often used in solving load flow problems. It has gained widespread applications owing
to its simplicity of data preparation and the ease with which the bus admittance matrix can be
formed and modified for network changes. Of course, sparsity is one of its greatest advantages as
it heavily reduces computer memory and time requirements. In short circuit analysis, the
generator and transformer impedances must also be taken into account. In contingency analysis,
the shunt elements are neglected, while forming the Z-bus matrix, which is used to compute the
outage distribution factors.
This can be easily obtained by inverting the Y-bus matrix formed by inspection method or by
analytical method. The impedance matrix is a full matrix and is most useful for short circuit
studies. Initially, the Y-bus matrix is formed by inspection method by considering line data only.
After forming the Y-bus matrix, the modified Y-bus matrix is formed by adding the generator
and transformer admittances to the respective diagonal elements and is inverted to form the Z-
bus matrix.
The performance equation for a n-bus system in terms of admittance matrix can be
written as,
I
1 Y
11
Y .... Y V
12 In 1
I Y Y .... Y V
2
21 22 2 n
2
. . . .
. . . .
I
n
Y
n 1
Y .... Y V
n 2 nn n
(or)
I = Ybus.V
The admittances Y11, Y12, Y1n are called the self-admittances at the nodes and all other
admittances are called the mutual admittances of the nodes.
Formulae Used:
n
Main diagonal element in Y-bus matrix = Y
j 1
ij Bij
Flowchart:
START
Is i = n
STOP
Algorithm:
Step 1: Read the values of number of buses and the number of lines of the given
system.
Step 2: Read the self-admittance of each bus and the mutual admittance between the
buses.
Step 3: Calculate the diagonal element term called the bus driving point admittance, Yij
which is the sum of the admittance connected to bus i.
Step 4: The off-diagonal term called the transfer admittance, Yij which is the negative
of the admittance connected from bus i to bus j.
Step 5: Check for the end of bus count and print the computed Y-bus matrix.
Step 6: Compute the Z-bus matrix by inverting the Y-bus matrix.
Step 7: Stop the program and print the results.
Sample Problem:
The bus and branch datas for a 3 bus system is given in table below. Form Y bus matrix by
inspection method.
Solution:
Formation of Y bus:
1 1 1 1
j0.05
0.06 j0.18 0.02 j 0.06 0.06 j0.18 0.02 j0.06
1 1 1 1
Ybus j 0.06
0.06 j0.18 0.06 j0.18 0.04 j0.12 0.04 j0.12
1 1 1 1
j0.05
0.02 j0.06
0.04 j0.12 0.04 j0.12 0.02 j0.06
Theoretical output:
Result:
The Y bus matrix was formed for the given system by direct inspection method and the results
were verified using MATLAB program.
S.NO.6
Aim:
To develop a computer program to obtain the building algorithm for bus impedance matrix of the
given power system.
Theory:
The Ybus /Zbus matrix constitutes the models of the passive portions of the power network. The
impedance matrix is a full matrix and is most useful for short circuit studies. An algorithm for
formulating [Zbus] is described in terms of modifying an existing bus impedance matrix
designated as [Zbus]old. The modified matrix is designated as [Zbus]new. The network consists of a
reference bus and a number of other buses. When a new element having self impedance Zb is
added, a new bus may be created (if the new element is a tree branch) or a new bus may not be
created (if the new element is a link). Each of these two cases can be subdivided into two cases
so that Zb may be added in the following ways:
1. Adding Zb from a new bus to reference bus.
2. Adding Zb from a new bus to an existing bus.
3. Adding Zb from an existing bus to reference bus.
4. Adding Zb between two existing buses.
Type 1 modification:
In type 1 modification, an impedance Zb is added between a new bus p and the reference bus as
shown in Figure 1
Network p
Zb Vp
Ref. Bus
Let the current through bus p be Ip, then the voltage across the bus p is given by,
Vp = Ip Zb
The potential at other buses remains unaltered and the system equations can be written as,
V1 0 I1
V2 0 I 2
Z bus old 0
0
V 0 I n
n
0 0 0 0 0 Z
V p b I p
Type 2 modification:
In type 2 modification, an impedance Zb is added between a new bus p and an existing bus k as
shown in Figure 2. The voltages across the bus k and p can be expressed as,
Vk(new) = Vk + Ip Zkk
Vp = Vk(new) + Ip Zp
= Vk + Ip(Zb + Zkk)
where, Vk is the voltage across bus k before the addition of impedance Zb
Zkk is the sum of all impedance connected to bus k.
1
n
Ik + Ip
Network k
Z Ip
b
p
Ref. Bus
In this modification, an impedance Zb is added between a existing bus k and a reference bus.
Then the following steps are to be followed:
1. Add Zb between a new bus p and the existing bus k and the modifications are done as in
type 2.
2. Connect bus p to the reference bus by letting Vp = 0.
To retain the symmetry of the Bus Impedance Matrix, network reduction technique can be
used to remove the excess row or column.
Type 4 Modification:
In this type of modification, an impedance Zb is added between two existing buses j and k as
shown in Figure 3. From Figure 3, the relation between the voltages of bus k and j can be written
as,
Vk Vj = IbZb (3)
1
n
Ij + Ib
Network j
Z Ib
b
k
Ik - Ib
Ref. Bus
The voltages across all the buses connected to the network changes due to the addition of
impedance Zb and they can be expressed as,
V1 = Z11I1 + Z12I2 + - - - - - - - - + Z1j(Ij + Ib) + Z1k(Ik Ib)+- - -
V2 = Z21I1 + Z22I2 + - - - - - - - - + Z2j(Ij + Ib) + Z2k(Ik Ib)+ - - -
Vj = Zj1I1 + Zj2I2 + - - - - - - - - + Zjj(Ij + Ib) + Zjk(Ik Ib) + - - - (4)
On solving the Equations (3) and (4), the system of equations can be rewritten as,
V1 ( Z 1 j Z 1k ) I1
V2 I 2
Z bus old
(5)
V ( Z kj Z kk ) I
n n
V I
p ( Z j1 Z k 1 ) ( Z jk Z kk ) Z bb p
where,
Zbb = Zjj + Zkk 2 Zjk + Zb
Step1: Number the nodes of the given network, starting with those nodes at the ends
of branches connected to the reference node.
Step2: Start with a network composed of all those branches connected to the
reference node.
Step3: Add a new node to the ith node of the existing network.
Step4: Add a branch between ith and jth nodes. Continue until all the remaining
branches are connected.
Sample problem:
Form bus impedance matrix using building algorithm:
Solution:
Step1: Add an element between ref (0) bus and a new bus (1).
Z = [j0.2]
Step2: Add an element between existing bus (1) to a new bus (2).
j 0.2 j 0.2
Z= j 0.2
j 0.6
Step3: Add an element between existing (2) Bus to a ref (0) Bus.
j 0.2 j 0.2 j 0.2
Z= j 0.2 j 0.6 j 0.6
j 0.2 j 0.6 j 0.8
New Z Bus:
Z11 = Z11-(Z31*Z13)/Z33
= j0.2 (j0.2*j0.2)/j0.8
Z11 = j0.05
Z12 =Z21= Z12-(Z32*Z13)/Z33
= j0.2 - (j0.6*j0.2)/j0.8
= j0.05
Z22 =Z22-(Z32*Z23)/Z33
=J0.6-(j0.6*j0.6)/j0.8
Z22 =j0.15
j 0.05 j 0.05
Z Bus = j 0.05
j 0.15
Result:
The bus impedance matrix using building algorithm for the given system was formed and the
results were verified using MATLAB program.
S.NO.7
Aim:
To develop a computer program to solve the set of non linear load flow equations using Gauss-
seidal load flow algorithm.
Theory:
Load flow analysis is the most frequently performed system study by electric utilities. This
analysis is performed on a symmetrical steady-state operating condition of a power system under
normal mode of operation and aims at obtaining bus voltages and line/transformer flows for a
given load condition. This information is essential both for long term planning and next day
operational planning. In long term planning, load flow analysis helps in investigating the
effectiveness of alternative plans and choosing the best plan for system expansion to meet the
projected operating state. In operational planning, it helps in choosing the best unit
commitment plan and generation schedules to run the system efficiently for them next days load
condition without violating the bus voltage and line flow operating limits.
The Gauss seidal method is an iterative algorithm for solving a set of non- linear
algebraic equations. The relationship between network bus voltages and currents may be
represented by either loop equations or node equations. Node equations are normally preferred
because the number of independent node equation is smaller than the number of independent
loop equations.
The network equations in terms of the bus admittance matrix can be written as,
For a n bus system, the above performance equation can be expanded as,
(2)
I Y p1 Y p 2 Y pp Y pn V p
p
I n Yn1 Yn 2 Ynp Ynn Vn
where n is the total number of nodes.
Vp is the phasor voltage to ground at node p.
Ip is the phasor current flowing into the network at node p.
At the pth bus, current injection:
( Pp jQ p )
Ip ( for any bus p except slack bus s) (5)
V p
Substituting for Ip in Equation (4),
1 P jQ n
Y pqVq ; p 2, .....n
p p
Vp (6)
Y pp V p* q 1
q p
Ip has been substituted by the real and reactive powers because normally in a power system these
quantities are specified.
Algorithm:
Flowchart:
Start
Y
Yes
E
Check for
slack bus
No
It is a load bus
No calculate
Check for 1 Pi jQi j 1 n
Gen bus V p 1
ical *
Yik V k Yik V k
Yii Vi k 1 j 1
Yes
Calculate
* i 1
Q Im Vip Y V Y V
n
p1 p1 p
i ik k ik k
k 1 k i
C
Yes
Check Set
p 1 Qi=Qi min
Qi Qmin
No
Yes
Check Set
p 1 Qi=Qi max
Qi Qmax
No
B
B
No
Check
D
i n
A
Yes
No
Check Increment
Vi p 1 iteration count
P = P+1
Yes
Stop
Sample Problem:
The load flow data for a 3 bus system is given in tables below. The voltage magnitude at bus 2
is to be maintained at 1.04 p.u. The maximum and minimum reactive power limits for bus 2 are
0.5 to 0.2 respectively. Taking bus 1 as slack bus, determine voltages of the various buses at
the end of first iteration starting with flat voltage profile for all buses except slack bus using
Gauss-Seidal method with acceleration factor of 1.6.
Bus Code Impedance Bus Number Admittance
12 0.06 + j0.18 1 j0.05
13 0.02 + j0.06 2 j0.06
23 0.04 + j0.12 3 j0.05
Solution:
Formation of Ybus:
Calculation of Q2:
* n
Q2 = Im V2 YpqVq
q 1
= Im1.04(1.66 j 5)(1.06) (4.16 j12.5)1.04 (2.5 j 7.5)
= Im1.04(1.763 j 5.30) (4.16 j12.5)1.04 (2.5 j 7.5)
= Im0.07 j 0.14
Q2 = 0.14, it violates the limits of the reactive power.
(1) 0 .2 j 0 .2
V2 = 0.075 71.63 ((1.66 j 5)(1.06) (2.5 j 7.5)(10)) Volts
1.04
= 0.075 71.634.452 j12.99
(1)
V2 = 1.047+j 0.007 volts
Accelerated voltage,
(1)
V2 = 1.04+ 1.6(1.047+j0.007 -1.04)
= 1+0.048-j0.048
(1)
V2 =1.0512+j0.0112 Volts
(1)
V3 = 1.041 j 0.017 Volts
Accelerated voltage,
(1)
V3 = 1+1.6(1.041 j 0.17- 1 )
V 3(1) = 1.0656-j0.272 Volts
Theoretical Output:
(1)
V1=1.06+j0 Volts, V2 =1.0512+j0.0112 Volts, V 3(1) = 1.0656-j0.272 Volts
Result:
The given set of load flow equations for a given power system were solved using Gauss-Seidal
method.
S.NO.8
Aim:
To develop a software program to obtain real and reactive power flows, bus voltage magnitude
and angles by using N R method.
Theory:
Load flow study in power system parlance is the steady state solution of the power system
network. The main information obtained from this study comprises the magnitudes and phase
angles of load bus voltages, reactive powers at generator buses, real and reactive power flow on
transmission lines, other variables being specified. This information is essential for the
continuous monitoring of current state of the system and for analyzing the effectiveness of
alternative plans for future system expansion to meet increased load demand.
Newton-Raphson method is an iterative method that approximates the set of non linear
simultaneous equations to a set of linear simultaneous equations using Taylors series expansion
and the terms are limited to first approximation. The rate of convergence is fast as compared to
the FDLF program and also it is suitable for large size system. So we go for N-R method.
The non-linear equations governing the power system network are,
I p Y pqV p for all p
pq
Let , V p V p e jp
V q V q e j q
pq p q and
Y pq Y pq e jpq
n
S p Pp jQ p V p Vq e j p q | Y pq | e jpq (2)
q 1
Separating the Real and Imaginary parts we get,
n
Pp V p Vq Y pq cos( p pq q )
q 1
n
Qp V p Vq Y pq sin( p pq q ) (3)
q 1
The Newton Raphson method requires that a set of linear equations be formed expressing the
relationship between the changes in real and reactive powers and the components of the bus
voltages as follows:
P2( r ) P2
(r )
P2
(r )
P2
(r )
P2
(r)
( r )
| 2
V V
2 n 2 n
|
Pn
(r ) (r ) (r ) (r)
Pn P2 Pn
|
P ( r )
V
V
(r )
n 2 n 2 n
n
| (4)
(r)
Q2 Q2
(r )
Q2
(r )
Q2
(r )
Q2
(r )
V ( r )
| 2
V V
2 n 2 n
|
Qn Qn
(r ) (r ) (r ) (r )
Q2 Qn
|
Qn
( r )
n V2
Vn Vn( r )
2
where, the coefficient matrix is known as Jacobian matrix.
In the above equation, bus 1 is assumed to be the slack bus. The Jacobian matrix gives
the linearized relationship between small changes in voltage angle i(r ) and voltage magnitude
Vi r with the small changes in real and reactive power Pi r and Qir . Elements of the
Jacobian matrix are the partial derivatives of (2) and (3) evaluated at ir and Vi r .
The above relationship can be written in a compact form as,
P J11 J12
Q J (5)
21 J 22 V
Pp n
Q
V p V q Y pq sin( p p2Vpqp Ypp sin
n
q ) pp V q Y pq sin( p pq q ) (7 ) (9 )
p q 1 Vp q 1
q p q p
J 12 :
Pp
V p Y pq cos( p pq q ) q p (10) All
Vq quantit
ies in
Pp n
2 V p Y pp cos pp V q Y pq cos( p pq q ) (11) the
Vp q 1 linear
q p
Equati
on (4)
J 21 :
pertai
Q p n to
V p V q Y pq cos( p pq q ) q p (12 )
q iterati
Q p n on r.
p
V p V q Y pq cos( p pq q ) (13 ) The
q 1
q p linear
equati
on when solved for , V gives the correction to be applied to |V| and , i.e.
Iter = Iter +1
V V V
new old account
at
new old
Yes
Solve the equation
1 2 P Calculate real & reactive
V Q line flows in all the lines
3 4
Algorithm:
The computational procedure for Newton-Raphson method using polar coordinate is as follows:
Q kp Q p sp Q kp cal p 2,3.....n
For PV buses, the exact value of Q p is not specified, but its limits are known. If
the calculated value of Q p is within limits, only Pp is calculated. If the
calculated value of Q p is beyond the limits, then an appropriate limit is imposed
and Q p is also calculated by subtracting the calculated value of Q p from the
appropriate limit. The bus under consideration is now treated as a load on
(PQ) bus.
Step 5: Compute the elements of the Jacobian matrix using the estimated V p and p
from step2.
Step 6: Obtain and V p from Equations (4) and (5).
Step 7: Using the values of p and V p calculated in step 6, modify the voltage
magnitude and phase angle at all loads by the Equations (14) and (15). Start the
next iteration cycle at step 2 with these modified V p and p .
Step 8: Continue until scheduled errors Ppk and Q kp for all load buses are within a
Sample Problem:
The load flow data for a 3-bus system is given in tables 1 and 2. The voltage magnitude at bus 2
is to be maintained at 1.0 p.u. The maximum and minimum reactive power limits for bus 2 are
0.3 and 0 p.u. respectively. Taking bus 1 as slack bus, determine the voltages of the various
buses at the end of first iteration starting with a flat voltage profile for all buses except slack bus
using N-R method.
Solution:
Formation of Ybus :
1
Y13 = - =-(5-j15)
0.02 j 0.06
= 15.81 108.4 0
1
Y23 = - =-(2.5-j7.5)
0.04 j 0.12
= 7.906 108.4 0
1 1
Y11 = + + j0.05+j0.06 =6.667-j19.89
0.06 j 0.18 0.02 j 0.06
=21.97 71.50
1 1
Y22 = + + j0.05+j0.05 =4.167-j12.4
0.06 j 0.18 0.04 j 0.12
=13.08 71.50
1 1
Y33 = + + j0.06+j0.05=7.5-j22.39
0.02 j 0.06 0.04 j 0.12
=23.61 71.50
Given V1 = 1.06+ j0 ; 1 = 00 ; V3 = 1 0 0
Pp = Pp(specified) Pp(calculated)
Qp = Qp(specified) Qp(calculated)
n
Pp V p Vq Y pq cos( p pq q )
q 1
n
Q p V p Vq Y pq sin( p pq q )
q 1
Elements of J1:
P2
2 |V2||Y22|cos 22 +|V1||Y21|cos(2 + 21 - 1) + |V3||Y23|cos(3 + 23 2)
V2
P2
|V2||Y23|cos(2 + 23 3)
V3
= 1 7.906 cos(108.4)
= -2.5
P3
|V3||Y32|cos( 32 + 2 - 3 )
V2
= 1 7.906 cos(108.4)
= -2.5
P3
2|V3||Y33|cos 33 +|V1||Y31|cos(1 + 31 3) + |V2||Y32|cos( 32 + 2 - 3 )
V3
= 2 1 23.61 cos(-71.5) + 1.06 15.81cos(108.4) + 1 7.906cos(108.4)
= 7.2
Elements of J2:
P2
|V2||V1||Y21|sin(2 + 21 1) - |V2||V3||Y23|sin(3 + 23 2)
2
= 1 1.06 5.27sin(108.4) 1 1 7.906 sin(108.4)
= -12.8
P2
- |V2||V3||Y23|sin(2 + 23 3)
3
= - 1 1 7.906 sin (108.4)
= -7.5
P3
- |V3| |V2||Y32|sin(3 + 32 2)
2
= - 1 1 7.906 sin (108.4)
= -7.5
P3
-|V3||V1||Y31|sin(3 + 31 1) - |V3||V2||Y32|sin(3 + 32 2)
3
= - 1 1.06 15.81sin(108.4)-1 1 7.906sin(108.4)
= - 23.4
Elements of J3:
Q2
{2|V2||Y22|sin 22 + |V1||Y21|sin(2 + 21 1) +|V3||Y23|sin(2 + 23 3 ) }
V2
= {2 1 13.08 sin(-71.5) + 1.06 5.27sin(108.4) + 1 7.906sin(108.4)}
= - 12.01
Q2
{ |V2||Y23|sin(2 + 23 3) }
V3
={ 1 7.906sin(108.4)}
= 7.5
Q3
{ |V3||Y32|sin(2 + 32 3)}
V2
= { 1 7.906sin(108.4)}
= 7.5
Q3
{ 2|V3||Y33|sin 33 - |V1||Y31|sin(3 + 31 1) - |V2||Y32|sin(3 + 32 2)
V3
= {2 1 23.61 sin(-71.5) +1 1.06 15.81sin(108.4) + 1 7.906 sin (108.4)}
= 21.4
Elements of J4:
Q2
{ |V2||V1||Y21|cos(2 + 21 - 1)+ |V2||V3||Y23|cos(2 + 23 3) }
2
= 1 1.06 5.27cos(108.4) + 1 7.906cos(108.4)
= -4.26
Q2
{ |V2||V3||Y23|cos(2 + 23 3) }
3
= - { 1 7.906cos(108.4)}
= 2.5
Q3
{ |V3||V1||Y31|cos(3 + 31 1) + |V3||V2||Y32|cos(3 + 32 2)
3
= 1 1.06 15.81cos(108.4) + 1 7.906cos(108.4)
= - 7.8
P J 11 J 12 V
Q J J 22
21
Result:
The load flow study of the given power system using Newton-Raphson method was conducted
using MATLAB and results was verified.
S.NO.9
Aim:
To become proficient in the usage of software in solving load flow problems using Fast
decoupled load flow method.
Theory:
Load flow study is useful in planning the expansion of power system as well as determining best
operation of the system. The principle obtained from load flow study is the magnitude and phase
angle of the voltage at each bus and real and reactive power flowing in each line. Load flow
analysis may be performed using A.C. network analyzer and also by digital computer. But now-
a-days digital computer oriented load flow analysis is a standard practice.
The fast decoupled load flow method is a very fast method of obtaining load flow
solutions. This method requires less number of arithmetic operations to complete an iteration
consequently. This method requires less time per iterations. In N-R method, the elements of
Jacobian are to be computed in each iteration .So the time per iteration is considerably more in
N-R method than in FDLF. The rate of convergence in FDLF method is slow requiring
considerably more number of iterations to obtain a solution than in the case of N-R method.
However accuracy is same in both the cases. In this method both the speeds as well as the
sparsity are exploited. This is an extension of N-R method formulated in polar co-ordinates with
certain approximation which results into a fast algorithm for load flow solution.
In practice, transmission system operating under steady state possesses strong
interdependence between active powers and bus voltages, angles, similarly there is strong
interdependence between bus voltage and reactive power
Pk Pk E m
H km ; N km
m E m
Qk Qk E m
J km ; Lkm
m E m
Pp QP E q
H pq ; L pq
q E q
The equation for power flow are again expressed below for calculating elements of Jacobian (ie
H & L)
E q Y pq cos pq p q
n
Pp E p E qY pp cos pp E
q 1, p
p
Q p E p E q Y pp sin pp E p E q Y pq sin pq p q
Therefore the elements of Jacobian (ie H & L) can be calculated as from the equations above of
power. OFF diagonal element of H is
Pp
H PQ sin pq p q
q
Flowchart:
Start
Calculate
P Q P H M
, Q N L V
V V
No
Are
P Q Find & V by solving the
, equations:
V V
1 2 V
V
3 4 Q
Yes
V V V
new old
Stop
C
Algorithm:
Step 1: Read the slack bus voltages, real bus powers and reactive bus powers, bus
voltage magnitudes and reactive power limits.
Step 2: Form the Y bus matrix without line charging admittance and shunt admittance.
Step 4: Form Y bus matrix with double the line charging admittance.
Step 9: If P/ |V| & Q/|V| are less than or equal to tolerance limit, solution has convergence
and go to step 12 otherwise increase iteration count and go to step 10.
[|V|] = [B]-1[Q/|V|]
Step 11: Update [] & [|V|] for all buses except slack bus.
Step 12: Compute slack bus power, line flows, real power loss, reactive power loss etc.
Sample Problem:
For the system shown in Figure 4.4 determine the voltage at the end of the 1st iteration by FDLF
method. The line reactances are marked in the figure.
1 j 0.1 2
j 0.2
3
j 0.2
Figure 4.4
Bus specifications:
Solution:
V10 1 j 0 1.00 0
V20 1.1 j 0 1.10 0
V30 1 j 0 1.00 0
Calculation of P and Q:
n
Pp V p Vq Y pq cos( p pq q )
q 1
P20,cal 0
P30,cal 0
n
Q p V p Vq Y pq sin( p pq q )
q 1
As 0QG25.5
Q2= QG2-QD2
QG2=-1.65+0.1
= -1.55
Hence it is not within the specified limits.
Find and V :
B ' 1 P
V
Q
V B '' 1
V
1
5
B
' 1 15
10
5
0.08 0.04
=
0.04 0.12
B
'' 1
1 / 10 0.1
0.04 P
0.08
0.04 0.12 V
2 0.08 0.04 4.38
0.04 0.12 3.65
3
2=0.2045
3=-0.2627
V 0.1 Q
V
V3 0.103
Find the new values of phase angle and magnitude of the voltage:
i p 1 i p i p
p 1 p p
Vi Vi Vi
p =0; i=2,3
21 20 20 0.2045 rad 11.710
31 30 30 0.2627 rad 15.05 0
p =0; i=3
1 0 0
V3 V3 V3 1 0.103 0.897
Result:
The load flow study on the given power system using Fast decoupled method was conducted
using MATLAB and results was verified.
S.NO.10
Aim:
To develop a computer program to carry out simulation study of a symmetrical three phase short
circuit on a given power system.
Theory:
Short circuits and other abnormal conditions often occur on a power system. Short circuits are
usually called faults by power system engineers. Some defects, other than short circuits are
also termed as faults.
Faults are caused either by insulation failures or by conducting path failures. The failure
of insulation results in short circuits which are very harmful as they may damage some
equipment of the power system. Most of the faults in transmission and distribution lines are
caused by over voltages due to lightning or switching surges, or by external conducting objects
falling on overhead lines. Overvoltages due to lightning or switching surges cause flashover on
the surface of insulators resulting in short circuits. Short circuits are also caused by tree branches
or other conducting objects falling on the overhead lines.
The fault impedance being low, the fault currents are relatively high. The fault currents
being excessive, they damage the faulty equipment and the supply installation. Also, the system
voltage may reduce to a low level, windings and busbars may suffer mechanical damage due to
high magnetic forces during faults and the individual generators in a power station or group of
generators in different power stations may loose synchronism
The symmetrical fault occurs when all the three conductors of a three-phase line
are brought together simultaneously into a shortcircuit condition as shown in Figure 1.
A
B
C
IA IB IC
Short circuit
Flowchart:
Start
I=0
Is
No
I < nb
Yes
Stop
Formula Used:
V
i) Fault Current, If =
Z f Z pp
Z bus
ii) Fault Voltage, Vf = V (1 )
Z f Z pp
where Zf Fault impedance
Zpp Line impedance
Algorithm:
Step 1: Read line data, machine data, transformer data, fault impedance etc.
Step 6: Compute fault current at faulted bus and bus voltage at all buses.
Sample problem:
For a simple power system as shown in figure, find with the help of bus-impedance matrix
method the post fault currents in all the branches and post-fault voltages at all buses, if a three
phase dead short circuit occurs at bus-3. The pre- fault currents are neglected.
E1=1.0 E2=1.0
j0.25 j0.2
1 j0.13
2
j0.08 j0.03
3
S
If=0
Solution:
1 1 1
Y22 = j 46.02
j 0.20 j 0.13 j 0.03
1 1
Y33 = j 45.83
j 0.03 j 0.08
1
Y12=Y21== j 7.69
j 0.13
1
Y13=Y31== j12.5
j 0.08
1
Y23=Y32== j 33.33
j 0.03
Vk0 f 1.0
Fault current, I = j 7.462 p.u.
Z 33 j 0.1343
f V1 f V3 f 0.2114 0
I13 = j1.999 p.u.
Z 13 j 0.1059
V f V3 f 0.143 0
I23f = 2 j1.2434 p.u.
Z 23 j 0.115
Result:
The program to carry out the simulation study of a symmetrical three phase short circuit on a
given power system was developed and the results were verified.
S.NO.11
Aim:
To develop a program for solving economic dispatch problem without transmission losses for a
given load condition using direct method and Lambda-iteration method.
Theory:
A modern power system is invariably fed from a number of power plants. Research and
development has led to efficient power plant equipment. A generating unit added to the system
today is likely to be more efficient than the one added some time back. With a very large number
of generating units at hand, it is the job of the operating engineers to allocate the loads between
the units such that the operating costs are the minimum. The optimal load allocation is by
considering a system with any number of units. The loads should be so allocated among the
different units that every unit operates at the same incremental cost. This criterion can be
developed mathematically by the method of lagrangian multiplier.
In a power system, with negligible transmission losses and with N number of spinning thermal
generating units the total system load PD at a particular interval can be met by different sets of
generation schedules.
PG1(K), PG2(K). PGN(K) ; k =1,2,.NS
Out of these NS sets of generation schedules, the system operator has to choose that set
of schedule which minimizes the system operating cost which is essentially the sum of the
production costs of all the generating units. This economic dispatch problem is mathematically
stated as an optimization problem. Given the number of available generating units Ns their
production cost function, their operating limits and the system load PD.
To determine the set of generating schedule PG,
F .P
N
Min FT = i Gi
(1)
i 1
N
PGi PD =0 (2)
i 1
i Gi i Gi i Gi i
i=1,2N (4)
where ai, bi and ci are constants.
The ED problem is given by the equations (1) to (4). By omitting the inequality constraint the
reduced ED problem may be restated as an unconstrained optimization problem by augmenting
the objective function with the constraint function multiplied by Lagrange multiplier to
obtain the Lagrange function L as,
F P P P
N N
Min: L(PG1,..PGN, )= i Gi Gi D
(5)
i 1 i 1
The necessary conditions for the existence of solution to (5) are given by,
L dF P
0 i Gi ; i=1,2..N (6)
PGi dPGi
L N
0 PGi PD (7)
i 1
The solution to ED problem can be obtained by solving simultaneously the necessary conditions
(6) and (7) which state that the economic generation schedules not only satisfy the system power
balance equation (8) but also demand that the incremental cost rates of all the units be equal to
which can be interpreted as incremental cost of received power when the inequality constraints
(3) are included in the ED problem the necessary condition (6) gets modified as
dFi PGi
= for PGi,min PGi PGi, max
dPGi
for PGi = PGi,max
for PGi = PGi, min (8)
The solution to the ED problem with the production cost function assumed to be a quadratic
function, equation (4), can be obtained by simultaneously solving (6) and (7) using a direct
method as given below,
dFi ( PGi )
= 2aiPGi + bi = ; i = 1,2, .......... N (9)
dPGi
From Equation (9) we obtain
PGi = ( bi) /2ai ; i = 1,2,............N (10)
Substituting Equation (10) in Equation (7) we obtain
N
( b ) / 2ai = PD
i 1
i
N N
(1 / 2ai ) (b1 / 2a1 ) PD
i 1 i 1
N N
( PD (bi / 2ai )) / (1 / 2ai ) (11)
i 1 i 1
Flowchart:
Start
Is PGi<
PD No
Yes
Assume 2< 1 Value
Assume 2 > 1 Value
Yes
Check
Pgi = Pd
No
2 1
Calculate 3 = 2 + Pd PG2
PG2 PG1
Stop
The method of solution involves computing using equation (11) and than computing the
economic schedules PGi; i=1,2,........N using equation (10). In order to satisfy the operating limits
(3) the following iterative algorithm is to be used.
Step 2: Compute using Equation (10) the economic schedules, PGi ; i = 1,2,........N
Step 4: Fix the schedule of the NV number of violating units whose generation PGi
violates the operating limits (12) at the respective limit, either PGi,max or PGi,min
Step 5: Distribute the remaining system load PD minus the sum of the fixed generation
schedules to the remaining units numbering NR (= N-NV) by computing using
Equation (11) and the PGi; i NR using equation (10) where NR is the set of
remaining units.
Step 6: Check whether optimality condition (8) is satisfied. If yes, stop the solution
Otherwise, release the generation schedule fixed at PGi,max or PGi,min of
those generators not satisfying optimality condition (8), include these units in the
remaining units, modify the sets NV , NR and the remaining load. Go to step 5.
Sample Problem:
Economic Dispatch without loss:
A power plant has three units with the following cost characteristics:
where Pis are the generating powers in MW. The maximum and minimum loads allowable on
each unit are 150 and 39 MW. Find the economic scheduling for a total load of i) 320 MW
ii) 200 MW
Solution:
P1 = 139.193 MW
P2 = 42.0965 MW
P3 = 138.7093 MW
Economic Dispatch without loss using Lamda Iteration method:
dF1
0.07(20) 15 16.4
dP1
dF2
0.08(80) 10 16.4
dP2
dF1 dF2
= 16.4
dP1 dP2
Solving the above Equations, we get
FT = F1 + F2 =1420 Rs / hr
Result:
The economic dispatch problem without transmission losses for a given load condition using
direct method and Lambda-iteration method was studied by developing a MATLAB program.
S.NO 12
Aim:
Theory:
ETAP power station is a fully graphical electrical transient analyzer program that can operate
under the Microsoft windows 98, NT4-0, 2000 and XP environments. The Windows 2000 and
XP Professional platforms provide the highest performance level for demanding applications,
such as large network analysis requiring intensive computation and online monitoring and
control applications. PowerStation allows us to work directly with graphical one-line diagrams,
underground cable raceway systems, ground grid systems and cable pulling systems. Power
station combines the electrical, logical, mechanical and physical attributes of system elements in
the same data base.
ETAP can simulate various power system problems like load flow analysis, short circuit
analysis, Harmonic analysis, Transient Stability analysis, Optimal power flow analysis, motor
acceleration analysis, Battery sizing discharge, DC load flow and DC short circuit analysis.
Power station organizers and accesses its database using Microsoft open database connectivity
(ODBC)
Under the project menu there are some options as follows to give or edit the properties. The
information and standard of the projects can be edited from this menu.
One line diagram menu bar contains a comprehensive collection of menu options. This menu bar
is displayed when a one line diagram is active. In the one line diagram presentation (OLV1), we
can graphically construct our electrical system by connecting the buses, branches motors etc.
from the one line diagram Edit tool bar.
Click on the required symbol on the edit tool bar which changes the cursor shape to the elements
picture.
Step 5: (Rotation)
For this right click to bring up the menu and select one of the orientation
To change or edit properties of an element right click and select the properties to get the editor.
Relocate elements:
Select an element and move the cursor on top of it, the cursor becomes a move symbol. Now
drag the element to a new position and release the left button.
The PowerStation Load Flow Analysis program calculates the bus voltages, branch power
factors, currents, and power flows throughout the electrical system. The program allows for
swing, voltage regulated, and unregulated power sources with multiple utility and generator
connections.
Select a study case from the Study Case Editor. Then click on the Run Load Flow Study icon to
perform a load flow study. A dialog box will appear to specify the output report name if the
output file name is set to Prompt. The study results will then appear on the one-line diagram and
in the output report.
Selecting the Update Cable Load Current icon will transfer cable load current data from the
previously run load flow study. The data is transferred to the Operating Load Current in the
Cable Editor for each cable associated with the load flow study.
The results from load flow studies are displayed on the one-line diagram. To edit how these
results look, click on the Load Flow Display Options icon.
Alert View:
After performing a load flow study, you can click on this button to open the Alert View, which
lists all equipment with critical and marginal violations based on the settings in the study case.
Load flow output reports are provided in two forms: ASCII text files and Crystal Reports. The
Report Manager provides four pages (Complete, Input, Result, and Summary) for viewing the
different parts of the output report for both text and Crystal Reports. Available formats for
Crystal Reports are displayed in each page of the Report Manager for load flow studies.
Choosing any format other than Text Report in the Report Manager activates the crystal reports.
Result:
The results obtained for load flow analysis using ETAP power station was verified.
S.NO 13
Fault analysis using MiPower Software
Aim:
To conduct fault analysis using Mipower software.
Theory:
POWERSCS module is designed to perform the short circuit study for the given system. Short
circuit studies are performed to determine the magnitude of the currents flowing throughout the
power system at various time intervals after a fault occurs. The magnitudes of current flowing
through the power system after a fault vary with time until they reach steady state condition. This
behavior is due to system characteristics and dynamics. The short circuit information is used to
select fuses, breakers and switchgear ratings in addition to setting protective relays. The short
circuit program computes the steady state fault current for the impedance considered.
Procedure to enter data for performing studies using Mipower:
1. Draw single line diagram and enter data simultaneously in database manager.
2. Open power system network editor. Select menu option Database-configure.
Configure database dialog box is popped up. Click browse button.
3. The elements can be selected from the power system tool bar.
4. The element ID can be selected by double click the element in the file. Enter the
details of the elements in detailed form.
5. Save and close the library screen.
6. To solve short circuit studies choose menu option solve-short circuit analysis.
7. Select the suitable fault in the fault type and select the bus no.
8. Click execute and short circuit study will be executed.
9. Click on report to view the report.
Result:
The results obtained for fault analysis using Mipower software was verified.